![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Hillary’s Health Care RemodelPosted on Sep 18, 2007By E.J. Dionne WASHINGTON—The genius of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been her skill at turning liabilities into assets and weaknesses into strengths. By putting out a detailed health care plan on Monday, Clinton embarked on this year’s most daring act of political jujitsu. Compared with Barack Obama and John Edwards, who have already issued well-reviewed proposals of their own, Clinton comes late to the health care sweepstakes. But there is a message in that, too. Her approach, she says, has been “very deliberate.” That’s why she offered ideas on curbing health costs and improving the quality of care before she got around to her plan to cover everyone. She mixes self-deprecating laughter with meticulous analysis of interest-group politics to send one clear message: The Hillary Clinton of 2007 is a wiser, shrewder and more realistic politician than the first lady who tried and failed to pass her husband’s health plan in 1993 and 1994—which, because of her high-profile role, is now inevitably called “Hillarycare.” In a telephone interview Monday shortly before she gave her Iowa speech, Clinton listed the tips she picked up at the Health Care School of Hard Knocks. “I learned in 1993 that people who have coverage need reassurance that they can keep their current plan,” she said, noting that her new proposal offers exactly that. In her address, she repeatedly invoked the words “you choose”—with the emphasis on you—as a litany that could drive away the evil spirits of the past. “This is not a government-run system,” she went on in the interview, responding pre-emptively to the assaults she knows will come her way. “There will be no new bureaucracy, no mandatory alliances.” And then came the most telling moment in the interview. At the mere mention of the word “alliances,” she broke into laughter. The “alliances” were purchasing cooperatives that constituted a genuinely innovative part of Bill Clinton’s 1993 plan. But they were easy to parody as big government monstrosities. Hillary Clinton’s chuckle—there seemed to be real mirth in it—says she now knows the word “alliances” is political kryptonite. There’s another message: She knows a lot more than she used to about voters and how to persuade them—and about herself. Leaders who can laugh at their own failures are usually more trustworthy than those who can’t. Again and again, Clinton went back to what she knows now that she wished she had known then. “You can have a great plan on paper, as I have learned the hard way,” she says, and still fail. Individuals and interest groups will always ask, “What’s in it for me?” She brings up the question herself. Gone is the moralist who might once have bridled at such a query. This time, she insists it’s “a fair question in our system.” And so her new plan has incentives for small businesses, special help to companies with high “legacy” costs for retired employees, and a lot of assistance for the middle class. This time, she will coax and charm the country toward universal health coverage. Cold analysis has given way to warm persuasion. The next phase of the campaign, now that the health plans are on the table, will not hinge on the dueling details. It will instead be a bigger argument among front-runners Clinton, Obama and Edwards over how they would govern. Over the weekend, a campaign lieutenant argued that Obama was more likely to get health care reform passed because he has a fresh approach to Washington, an ability to bring parties together, and the tools to inspire the country. Implicit was a critique of the old Hillary, and her past failures. With Obama, the past would be the past. Edwards is the visionary who by sheer force of commitment will shake Washington up, and has set the pace for his opponents on issues ranging from poverty to health care. And then there is Clinton, who can say: Been there, done that, won’t be fooled again. The assumption behind her offensive on health care was nicely described by one her advisers on the eve of her speech: “In Washington, it’s: ‘You lost, you failed, goodbye.’ In the rest of the United States, it’s: ‘You fail, you learn from your mistakes, and you do it right the next time.’ ”
“It’s not just about health care,” said this adviser. “It’s about her.” So it is. It could turn out that Clinton’s strongest argument is that someone who is aware of her own shortcomings, laughs about them and works at them, has the character to be president.
Previous item: If It's Broke, Fix It Next item: Checkbook Imperialism: The Blackwater Fiasco Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By ec kostrubala, October 2, 2007 at 5:24 pm #
The links I provided below didn’t print off correctly. Hopefully these will:
http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 12968734_1_1_1_1,00.html
and
http://www.oecd.org/document/46/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 34971438_1_1_1_1,00.html
Report thisBy ec kostrubala, October 2, 2007 at 5:16 pm #
Corrected links:
http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 12968734_1_1_1_1,00.html
and
http://www.oecd.org/document/46/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 34971438_1_1_1_1,00.html
Report thisBy ec kostrubala, October 2, 2007 at 8:44 am #
For data comparison of America’s health care with other Western countries, please see:
http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 12968734_1_1_1_1,00.html
“The most comprehensive source of comparable statistics on health and health systems across OECD countries. It is an essential tool for health researchers and policy advisors in governments, the private sector and the academic community, to carry out comparative analyses and draw lessons from international comparisons of diverse health care systems.”
Specific highlights for each country, including America, are found here:
http://www.oecd.org/document/46/0,3343,en_2825_495642_ 34971438_1_1_1_1,00.html
Why should Americans continue to support private insurance? You get what you pay for. What has our money gotten us?
America ranks less in infant mortality, longevity, and disease prevention, to name just some health care markers, than other Western countries. Yet America alone spends more of our Gross Domestic Product on medical care than other countries do. Countries which not only outdo us, but do so with government run systems to boot.
For several years my late husband and I lived and worked in London. Our medical care came from the publicy funded health care system (NHS TRUST) of the United Kingdom, for which we paid taxes out of our salaries.
We never paid any money out of pocket for doctor’s visits. Nor money out of pocket for immunizations. Nor for vaccinations. And when my husband sustained an injury requiring ambulance service, ICU care, and extensive hospitalization, we never received any medical bill whatsoever. A 30 day prescription cost about 9 dollars.
‘Voice of Truth’ speaks like an apologist for the profiteering insurance industry and is another anonymous person making statements with no basis in fact. For more about the case for universal, publicly funded health care, please see New Hampshire Debates section:
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20070928_new_hamp shire_debate/
Report thisBy Leefeller, September 19, 2007 at 7:28 pm #
particle61
The same people that are taking away our other rights are the ones that disagree that health care should be a human right.
“Selfish and bigoted Americans will never agree that health care is a human right
And for those who either are paid by the insurance/pharma industry or scared by these same ‘it’s mine now’ brutes, your time is over...please join the makers of slide-rules and pony express riders and disappear as we make you and your horrible industry irrelevant.”
Great post by the way, the paragraph above about the insurance/pharma industry, going the way of the pony express hits home, just consider NAFTA and all the jobs out sourced and industry jobs that were forced out of the USA by the same people who are trying to keep status quo, their status quo. As usual just follow the money. The grand plan to eliminate our borders, and dismantle the middle class.
Report thisBy DennisD, September 19, 2007 at 5:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s been 40 plus years since this government of ours has actually done anything for we its tax slaves. I would like to know just which corporations Hillarious’ plan would benefit most and of course the ever popular question - where is the money coming from to fund it.
E.J. - Maybe next time you can dig a little deeper since I’d really like to hear in detail just what the “genius” proposes and how the “genius” intends to accomplish it instead of some obscure BS campaign promise to excite the true believers. With or without a health care plan she is unelectable.
Report thisBy particle61, September 19, 2007 at 4:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
hello moral americans-
as far as personal experience goes, here’s my story-
I lived in the UK for 2 years. While I was living there I traveled to Africa where I picked up a nasty abdominal bug. When I returned to the UK (Oxford) it became clear that I would need medicine to get rid of the illness
I called a local doctor’s office, got an appointment (for that same morning), got a complete examination, received a diagnosis, was prescribed medication, and received a bill for 7 pounds fifty.
I am an American citizen, I used my passport as my identification.
I ask any poster here to tell me what Ameican city I would have rec’d the same great, prompt and cheap medical care in (especially if I identified myself as a ‘foreigner’).
Still waiting for an answer…
Selfish and bigoted Americans will never agree that health care is a human right. Like those who display their small mindedness and selfishness on this page, the argument is always reduced to this horrible, immoral and myopic type of attacking argument; ‘i have mine-and if you can’t get yours, you must be stealing’. For those of you who feel more free by witholding humanity from others, here is a fact...we don’t need you.
And for those who either are paid by the insurance/pharma industry or scared by these same ‘it’s mine now’ brutes, your time is over...please join the makers of silde-rules and pony express riders and disappear as we make you and your horrible industry irrelavant.
Is it not true that the plans so far promoted by “Democrats” would require us Americans, force us Americans to become customers of the industry whose practices prompted the creation of the term “red-lining”? is that not the same industry whose job it is to refuse medical treatment to people because they are poor and/or sick?
I know that American is not a synonym for the word selfish, I know that America has the wealth and humanity to treat all citizens who need medical care.
Slurs and scare tactics work on specific types of audiences-but appeals to rationality, humanity, morality and community can release those held in bondage by fear mongers and ‘ownership society’ blowhards.
We can take care of our fellow humans, but only, just like John and Yoko said, “if you want it”
particle61
Report this“it is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society”
krishnamurti
By voice of truth, September 19, 2007 at 11:32 am #
Poor Jeanine, she sees the evil bogeyman everywhere. To set the record straight, I am not a corporate shill. I did, in fact, live in the UK from 2002-2006, as mentioned in one of the my other posts, and had extensive experience with the NHS there. Its awful, and anyone in the UK will tell you the same thing. Its funny that you state you only want to deal with facts, yet your entire argument on the merits of the European model is hearsay (that means second hand information). I, on the other hand, have actually lived through it. Who’s comments are more relevant??
And Louise, I am sorry to hear what you went through with your child, as well as your friend. I myself have 4 children, and one of them was born with a heart defect, necessitating open heart surgery at 8 weeks old. I consider us very lucky, not the least of which is that, living in Atlanta, we have access to Emory’s Children’s Hospital, one of the best in the world. I would never have hoped for my daughter to live had we been in the UK then.
I also agree with you (Louise) on much of what you state, but I don’t see how a single-payer national health system alleviates that. The drugs that kids are given today are really the result of parents not wanting to put up with unruly kids and be actual parents. Everyone wants the quick solution. Look at the rise in antibiotic resistant infectious diseases. Again, people want a quick fix to their cold, get anti-biotics over-prescribed, and then don’t follow the course of medication. Hence, the only virus / bacteria that live are the strong ones.
So you knew my great grandfather as well!
Report thisBy John Borowski, September 19, 2007 at 11:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Folks, when I want to know the identity of the right wing lackeys I wait for an article that is derogatory to the Clintons or any Liberal. Than I look at the comments and remember their names. I can affirm my assessment by looking at articles like Blackhawk that denigrates the evil in power in this country currently. Very few of the right-wing lackeys have any comment in these articles.
Report thisBy Louise, September 19, 2007 at 10:39 am #
#101280 by voice of truth on 9/19 at 5:37 am
“ ... infant mortality was at levels we see in today’s third world countries, and it was very common for families to have lost at least one child.”
You speak of an era that pre-dates my memory. Known as the “Gilded Era” when the robber barons ruled, and yes infant mortalities were high among the working class. Now, we see their descendents pushing us back more than a hundred years to that very unpleasant period in our nations history. The period that eventually led to the Great Depression.
And once again, infant mortality is on the rise.
It must be remembered the numbers that comprise infant mortality also include the numbers of children who die in the first year of life, and there is a disparity in those numbers between the races, and between the working poor and the shrinking middle class.
Interesting that you should mention Polio as rampant.
One of my children had polio.
It was out there, highly contagious, but rampant? The year my child had Polio was a bad year. About 350 cases in our area, with a population of about 75,000.
I was thrilled when the Salk vaccine came out, then went on to see a friends child get polio from the live vaccine 10 years later.
We were lucky. After two years of therapy my child was fully recovered, with no signs of paralysis left.
My friend wasn’t so lucky. Her daughter was condemned to a life-time in leg braces.
Lets look at today.
One in 94 male children are diagnosed with autism! Now THAT is rampant! We are talking about brain damage here! Finally scientists are starting to seriously study the link between autism and the measles vaccine!
What about asthma?
When my child had Polio asthma afflicted perhaps one child in a thousand. Today, asthma is affecting up to one in four urban children! Asthma can be triggered by allergens, including drugs. The treatment of choice is ... drugs!
Then there’s our “fat” epidemic. How much of that is the direct result of foods laced with drugs?
When we admitted our child to the hospital, no one asked, or cared whether or not we had insurance. The family doctor was there checking on him several times a day, even though his office was far away. He was given 24/7 care by a dedicated hospital staff, until finally, after two and a half weeks his fever broke.
When we took him home, again no one asked, or cared whether or not we had insurance. They were far to busy teaching us how to care for him in the following weeks, perhaps months until he was fully recovered. Arrangements were made to make monthly payments [we chose not to call on the Infantile Paralysis Association, feeling there were many who really did need financial help] Perhaps a choice that we would not have been allowed to make in today’s world of health care.
The hospital referred us to a pediatrician who was one of the best in treating children recovering from Polio. Again, he didn’t ask, or care whether or not we had insurance. He simply set about getting us on a regimen of diet and therapy for our child.
Somewhere along the way, we arranged to make monthly payments, and two years later my child was fully recovered.
And you know what? Not once in that whole period was my child prescribed a drug!
The total bill, hospital, doctor, and therapy came to less than $3000.00. [we had it paid in five years] Granted a whole years income, but in today’s world the yearly income can be exceeded in the first few days of emergency care! The insurance coverage wiped out in a week!
My Childs illness pre-dated $00.25 per gallon gas. I think that came quite some time after the Salk vaccine. We had an old man in town who coasted everywhere [maybe it was your great grandfather] only I think it was because he couldn’t see ten feet in front of him.
Report thisBy Passing the wind, September 19, 2007 at 10:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Voice of Truth,
I give you my name, for will it provide you with creditability.
Report thisBy felicity, September 19, 2007 at 10:16 am #
We’re 35th in the world in the quality of our health care - so much for the argument that our system provides tip-top medical care.
A huge study done a few years ago determined that France’s single-payer health care system - works like Social Security - provided the best care for the least amount of money per person.
For all on this site who argue that the insurance business doesn’t belong in the health care business I heartily agree. It was a mega-profit business prior to entering the health care business, it will be when it leaves.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 19, 2007 at 7:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
101280 by voice of truth on 9/19 at 5:37 am
Face it, this has never been about insurance companies, or access to health care. This issue has always been about people wanting SOMEONE ELSE TO PAY THEIR HEALTH BILLS
Ford (of Dearborn Michigan) was one of the first corporate entities to see the wisdom of a single-payer national health plan. Toyota of Japan has no health-care expenses, nor does BMW, or Volvo Truck. Because of the growing expense of health care, Ford was hoping our government would pick up that expense as does Japan, Sweden, and other countries which export motor vehicles to the US. Health care costs are killing companies like Caterpillar. Komatsu pays no such expense and is able to undercut prices considerably.
Eventually we will depart form health-care as a Republican vs Democrat, or conservative vs Liberal issue.
Additionally contending that National Health care is making you pay for someone else’s care is like me saying “National defense” or Local police costs is making me pay for someone else’s safety and security..
If you want to send out a “check-off tax bill” to working Americans, asking them to check services for which they are willing to pay, I’m on board that boat. Until then, guess we will just elect people who will provide the services all of us NEED, with a bare minimum of luxuries.
Report thisBy Jeanine Molloff, September 19, 2007 at 7:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear ‘voice of truth,’
Your voice speaks to anything BUT the truth. You claim to have lived in a country where single payer for all was available, and the care was either incompetent or non-existent. Well, you can claim anything, but you can’t prove said claim. I suspect that you’re sitting in an expensive office of a major PR firm, a hired gun paid to troll these sites and kill any voices of dissent.
I have a counter-claim. I have friends who lived in Europe, experienced the single payer system and NEVER want to go through our broken non-system. We can argue this point of credibility forever, but it will only delay substantive discussion of the issue. Since you seem to have one goal; namely to dissolve any factual discussion of single payer (other than to destroy the item), then we should ignore you and your falatious rants.
To those of you who still harbor doubts; I would advise you to consult PROJECT CENSORED. PROJECT CENSORED is a journalism group out of Sonoma State Univ. dedicated to reporting the news that was either underreported by the mainstream media lapdogs, or was omitted entirely. Not only CAN THEY CITE THEIR SOURCES---THEY DO CITE THEIR SOURCES. UNLIKE ‘VOICE OF TRUTH’--PROJECT CENSORED HAS RESTORED THE OLD TRADITION OF JOURNALISM BEING THE ‘FOURTH ESTATE’ IN SERVICE TO THE BEST DEMOCRACY CAN OFFER. DON’T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT; CONSULT PROJECT CENSORED AND THE ENORMOUS BIBIOGRAPHY AND FOOTNOTES PROVIDED IN EACH ARTICLE.
TO ‘VOICE OF TRUTH,’ I WOULD SAY THAT THOSE WHO CLAIM TO KNOW THE END-ALL, BE-ALL OF ‘TRUTH,’ THOSE WHO CLAIM TO BE THE FINAL ARBITER OF THE ‘RIGHT CHOICE,’ ARE TO BORROW ANOTHER TERM--MUCH LIKE ...’THE SOUND AND THE FURY,’ BLATHERING ON, AND SIGNIFYING...NOTHING.
SIGN ME
Report thisJEANINE MOLLOFF
(BORED WITH ‘VOICE OF TRUTH’ AND THE RABID CORPORATE RANT)
By voice of truth, September 19, 2007 at 5:37 am #
Oh, to pine for that long ago world.... When gas was $0.25 per gallon, and my great grandfather would turn off the car and coast down hills to save.
Oh yeah, and childhood diseases like polio were rampant, infant mortality was at levels we see in today’s third world countries, and it was very common for families to have lost at least one child.
I also remember the first HMO’s, which were expensive, but you could get everything done for free! Face it, this has never been about insurance companies, or access to health care. This issue has always been about people wanting SOMEONE ELSE TO PAY THEIR HEALTH BILLS.
Report thisBy voice of truth, September 19, 2007 at 5:33 am #
So, if 1 million people join the rolls of “uninsured” every year, you automatically assume that no one ever leaves that state? That’s pretty myopic.
Report thisBy Louise, September 18, 2007 at 9:27 pm #
Once upon a time, in a land far away, a parent could call the doctor and actually get the doctor on the phone. In that long gone fantasy land, the doctor would drop by the house on his way home, so you wouldn’t have to take a sick child into his office.
That far away place called health care for all was there if you could come up with twenty bucks. Or maybe a couple of hundred if your child was hospitalized with pneumonia. Or you had a baby.
Shots were a few bucks, not mandatory and didn’t give your kids autism, or other forms of brain damage.
Back then in the gone forever world of honest doctors dedicated to treating the sick and injured, they would try to diagnose the cause rather than get you or your kid hooked on drugs. And gosh you just loved ‘em, because if you didn’t have the money they would take payments, or yard work.
Cancer was so rare, it was a wonder, even though everybody smoked and pollution was everywhere.
Back in that long lost once upon a time world, cancer wasn’t the big profit making industry it is today.
But that world that I remember so well is gone forever. Kidnapped, assaulted, raped and destroyed!
By big pharma and their partner in crime, the insurance industry.
The day they took over the health care industry was the beginning of the end of decent health care for all.
You see, they exist to feed corporate power and prophet and the do-nothing investors who expect their piece of your pie.
How about that? Live or die, sick or well, They really don’t care, as long as your dollars line their pockets.
Of course Hillary cant know any of that. She’s to young.
Like most [don’t bother me with the facts] politicians she only knows the here and now and what rubs up with money.
And like Obama and Edwards, giving even more power to the power brokers appeals so much more than giving medicine back to the medical practitioners. That would require an honest accounting. And maybe the money would be cut off, and we cant have that.
You and I can get sick and die, but the money is eternal.
Report thisBy particle61, September 18, 2007 at 3:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
http://www.redstateupdate.net reports that the Kaiser Family Foundation announced the results of a survey that they recently performed that found the following--
the cost of employer based insurance has gone up over 6 percent since the beginning of this year
-over the past 7 years the cost of employer based health insurance rose 78 percent (during the same period, wages increased 19 percent and inflation increased 12 percent)
-one million Americans join the ranks of the uninsured every year (not, as alluded to above by a poster, who suggests that the ranks of the uninsured do not ever increase)
and,
-45 percent of companies plan to shift more of the cost of insurance on their workers over the next year.
Further, Consumer Reports recently did a poll that found that 29 percent of Americans who pay for employer based health care (yes, those folks who have had to pony-up and pay those yearly percentage increases) are “under-insured”...meaning, after paying through the nose, they are still not adequately covered by for-profit health insurance companies.
These facts are only possible in a world where a moral imperative is managed by an industry. Let me repeat for those readers who carry water for that industry: a moral imperative is managed by an industry.
I stand with the posters and all Americans who understand that selling off our well being to pad the profits of one of the most avaricious and wealthy industries in world history (insurance, and of course pharma) is immoral...National Health care must happen- and we can make it happen.
The article above is not about American Health Care, but rather a piece on a candidate’s effort to promote herself.
http://www.redstateupdate.net
Report thisfunny, frightening, free
and ‘it’s all true’
By voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 2:27 pm #
That wasn’t John Butterfield from RI, is it?
Report thisBy Max Shields, September 18, 2007 at 2:14 pm #
#101105 by Sharon Ash on 9/18 at 10:36 am
(Unregistered commenter)
So, of all the comments on here, how many of you have actually read Hillary’s plan? There was about 12 pages of it that I printed off and read, and just like the health care crisis we face in this country is complicated, so are the solutions. But the plan which Hillary has proposed, and which I have actually read, and I am guessing the writer of this article has also, actually read, is a very good start to addressing the problems without turning it into another big, inefficient, government program. I have started to worry about some of you on the left, as you are beginning to sound very, very shrill. As the old saying goes, “You’d bitch if you were hung with a new rope.”
===============================================
No, solutions do not need to be complicated. One of the biggest problems with the existing health care “system” is that it is too complex. It can and should be simplified. It is only complex when privatized with insurance plans who use complicated ways of gauging a return on your premium dollars.
I haven’t read Hillary’s plan. But from what she has said it requires that no one be exempt from getting insurance - that does not mean that people get the coverage needed. If you saw Sicko you’ll note that it focused not on the uninsured but the underinsured.
Private insurance is a fraud. There is no need to have a profit driving our health care. What’s more our delivery outcomes are some of the worst - Hillary’s insurance plan for all will not solve that critical issue.
Reading her “plan” is not a way to understanding the problem. It’s vital to first understand our health care system in its entirety, determine what we need and forget about the labels - you’ll find that a modified simple single payer system brings efficiencies and reduces costs while allowing for transparency and improved outcomes.
Report thisBy John F. Butterfield, September 18, 2007 at 2:00 pm #
Dennis Kucinich for president.
Why is anyone even talking about Hillary?
Dennis Kucinich for president.
Report thisBy thomas billis, September 18, 2007 at 1:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It is one thing to actually make a mistake and quite another to be right and have the country catch up with you.The one thing that has changed is that Hillary is the Number 1 recipient of HMO dollars on the democratic side.She has not learned from her mistakes she has been reducated by the HMO dollars.Some where in the comments I saw an analogy between health care and someone wanting a mercedes.This health care issue is about Pursuit of Happiness.The government should make all efforts to allow you to pursue happiness.Tell me what happiness you can pursue if you cannot afford healthcare to be able to treat an illness.The mercedes is what you are pursuing when you are healthy.
Report thisBy voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 1:55 pm #
by the way, those were direct quotes from Empress Hillary Rodham
Report thisBy voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 1:54 pm #
“At this point, we don’t have anything punitive that we have proposed,”
“you have to show proof to your employer that you’re insured as a part of the job interview — like when your kid goes to school and has to show proof of vaccination,” but said such details would be worked out through negotiations with Congress.
Holy crap, are you kidding me?!?!?!?!
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 18, 2007 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Its also funny that the 40 million number has not changed since the first go round of Hillarycare, in 1992. Therefore, though the population has increased from 220million to 300million (36%), the amount of uninsured people is flat. HELLO McFLY. Does that not tell you anything????
Actually the number is 48-50 million today. That does not count the millions of illegals who get health care we have to pay for.
Since the population of the US was 260 million in 1990, I am not sure what you are using for figures.
Have you a link?
Report thisBy voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 1:33 pm #
Well Sharon, I have read it also. Government mandate that I MUST have health insurance??? Why? And what happens if I don’t?? Will I go to jail because I don’t have / want it??
Many, many of the so-called 41 million people without health insurance today choose not to have it. Many make the economic decision that they would rather pay their own bills than pay for higher cost insurance.
Funny how libs are always wanting government to force people to do what they believe in, but go ballistic when they think government is forcing them to do something they don’t. What a bag of hypocrites.
Its also funny that the 40 million number has not changed since the first go round of Hillarycare, in 1992. Therefore, though the population has increased from 220million to 300million (36%), the amount of uninsured people is flat. HELLO McFLY. Does that not tell you anything????
Report thisBy Juba, September 18, 2007 at 1:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s bullshit, plain and simple. We need to get rid of the Insurance Industry. Anything else is just more corporate welfare, with more terrible HMO ‘managed care” that sucks. Basically her program will give tax dollars to the same greedy bastards that are running the terrible system we have now.
Voice of Truth is anything but. Vague tales of horror at the hands of the socialists and empty patriotic rhetoric aren’t going to work anymore my friend. The proof is in the pudding. Look at any statistical indicators (Lifespan, infant mortality etc) and America is at the bottom of the list. And we spend more to boot. Who in their right mind could defend our current health care system? Only those who have a political axe to grind, those who still live under the absurd notion that privatization will solve all of mankind’s problems.
This article is nothing more than a banal fluff piece celebrating Clinton’s (and the DLC’s) mediocrity. Dennis K. is the ONLT candidate that is for a Canadian type system, which is what we deserve. Anything less is just more of the same bad managed system we have now.
Report thisBy Juba, September 18, 2007 at 1:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s bullshit, plain and simple. We need to get rid of the Insurance Industry. Anything else is just more corporate welfare, with more terrible HMO ‘managed care” that sucks. Basically her program will give tax dollars to the same greedy bastards that are running the terrible system we have now.
Voice of Truth is anything but. Vague tales of horror at the hands of the socialists aren’t going to work anymore my friend. The proof is in the pudding. Look at any statistical indicators (Lifespan, infant mortality etc) and America is at the bottom of the list. And we spend more to boot. Who in their right mind could defend our current health care system? Only those who have a political axe to grind, those who still live under the absurd notion that privatization will solve all of mankind’s problems.
This article is nothing more than a banal fluff piece celebrating Clinton’s (and the DLC’s) mediocrity. Dennis K. is the ONLT candidate that is for a Canadian type system, which is what we deserve. Anything less is just more of the same bad managed system we have now.
Report thisBy middle.american, September 18, 2007 at 1:04 pm #
O.K. I’ll change my mind about insuring every American using the insurance companies as a go between the taxpayer and the health care provider. Hell, I’ll even allow you to go ahead and privatize (corporatize) the rest of Medicare so long as you can guarantee me one thing. The one stipulation I have is that a corporate program will not cost the taxpayers one dime more than a Government run expansion of Medicare to all citizens would cost to administer. Can you promise that or will it cost the taxpayers 30-40% more just so that insurance companies can act as a go between to manage the paperwork?
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 18, 2007 at 12:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
101105 by Sharon Ash on 9/18 at 10:36 am
“So, of all the comments on here, how many of you have actually read Hillary’s plan?”
Actually I did read it. and although it sounds somewhat like Obama’s and Edward’s, it is far similar to what Mitt Rommney pushed through in Massachusetts. It even has Mitt’s “Mandatory” component. Watching Hill-the-business-shill is like looking at a new movie when one has been around for many years and has seen lots of old movies. Movie writers and directors are continually stealing from Dickens, Poe, and Twain (Clemments) I don’t think the business shill ever had an idea of her own.
Report thisBy FFURKS, September 18, 2007 at 12:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
101112 by voice of truth on 9/18 at 10:54 am
“When I spoke the two magic words “private insurance”, I was scheduled for the next day.”
Hummm, then health-care in Great Britain IS better than US health care. My doctor told me I might have Prostrate cancer (Elevated PSA 15) and he ordered me a test at a urologist.
I waited two months for the scheduled appointment, then three days before the appointment, the office called and told me I was rescheduled for a date another two months in the future. The reason given was the Doctor had to attend a conference in Hawaii! (Maui I believe)
Nice feeling to know you MIGHT have cancer and the doctors don’t give a shit.
Thanks for asking, I don’t know, my new appointment with a new urologist is October 22. The old urologist is moving his office out-of-state (not a great deal of money in Maine)
Maybe health care can get worse.... for someone.
Report thisBy 1drees, September 18, 2007 at 11:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
There are atleast 41 million people in USA who are not covered by any healthcare insurance. And in a country where that is normal or mandatory it does become a serious drawback if one is not covered by one insurance. which could mean being denied what is called primary healthcare services which could result in loss of life or more.
Report thisOn one hand USA goes around claiming to be the best country in the world and then we see this part and these two things ( and some others) dont really go with the show. I man how could you be warring other people to export your GOOD when your good stinks?
It is true that each system has its problems and drawbacks, so it cannot be simply concluded that so and so system is good or discardable. it just needs to be realized that certain systems ned certain kind of tweaks, and if those can be given that is good otherwise we are in one crappy system or another.
IT WILL ONLY BE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC THAT WILL BE ABLE TO GUIDE THE SYSTEM INTO A OSITIVE LOGICAL DIRECTION, coz if youleave it up to the politicans ( who are so strongly unpeople-ish that i wouldnt expect zich from them) so Hillary or Zillary forget them, try and take the reigns and guide the system into a productive for all direction. one can even start by crossexamining the current systema nd then changing it to someting more firendlier to American Humans rather than the profiteers, already evident is the effect of the War profiteers. Do we need that all over America? i hardly think so.
By voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 10:54 am #
Leefeller
I lived in the UK for 5 years. Nationalized Healthcare, and it sucks. It is not called the National Health System for nothing. And it is not “free” as many would call it. The payroll taxes to pay for this “free” service are astronomical. Also, anyone who can (i.e., everyone with a job) pays for additional private insurance.
When I needed a test for a potentially very serious issue, the doctor gave me a date 2 months in the future. When I spoke the two magic words “private insurance”, I was scheduled for the next day.
Again I will say, everyone in the US already has health care as a “basic thing”. What they don’t have, and apparantly what you want them to have, is someone to pay their healthcare bills, which is not the same thing.
And I wish I had a convertible Mercedes!
I’d much rather have that than have to pay through the nose for someone else’s health bills.
Report thisBy Sharon Ash, September 18, 2007 at 10:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
So, of all the comments on here, how many of you have actually read Hillary’s plan? There was about 12 pages of it that I printed off and read, and just like the health care crisis we face in this country is complicated, so are the solutions. But the plan which Hillary has proposed, and which I have actually read, and I am guessing the writer of this article has also, actually read, is a very good start to addressing the problems without turning it into another big, inefficient, government program. I have started to worry about some of you on the left, as you are beginning to sound very, very shrill. As the old saying goes, “You’d bitch if you were hung with a new rope.”
Report thisBy Leefeller, September 18, 2007 at 10:22 am #
Voice of Truth,
Are you serious?
You mentioned that you had lived in a county with national health care, which country?
Comparing life and death of health care to as you said:
“Well guess what, I have a problem paying for a new Mercedes convertible.” you went on to say should the government pay for that too?
All people in our county should have some basic things, and one is health care. In your case it might be a Mercedes convertible.
Report thisBy voice of truth, September 18, 2007 at 9:21 am #
You are all missing the point. This is nothing more than Hillary’s latest attempt to gain even more control over what average Americans do.
There is NO PROBLEM with healthcare. We have the best health care in the world, and EVERYONE has access to it. There IS a problem with people wanting to pay for their healthcare. Well guess what, I have a problem paying for a new Mercedes convertible. Should the government get you to pay for my car as well?
And what is the difference between an insurance company making a profit on your healthcare or a doctor making a profit on your healthcare?? Both are providing a service. Why do most of the socialists on this site think profit is a four letter word (literaly and figuratively, I think).
Finally, to Jeanine, “we” are not “demanding single payer medicare for all”. Only a fool would do that. I have lived in a country with that, and the health CARE is horrible, expensive, and very hard to access. Hard, that is, for those who don’t have additional private insurance which, of course, is paid through those evil health insurance companies. Grow up and enter the world.
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, September 18, 2007 at 8:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
So Hill-the-business-shill is back once again attempting to enrich business at the expense of American people. Her membership on the india caucus isn’t enough, now she wants MANDATED health insurance which she compares to “auto insurance” Does even the most naive entrenched partisan Democrat believe this horse-hockey?
Single payer, Universal, paperless, health care for all US citizens rich or poor is the only way to make health care affordable for the average American. It has the added conservative appeal of being good for business // BUT \\ something our great congressional and presidential candidate thinkers seem to have missed.... Universal health care is a subsidy prohibited by NAFTA, and Canada received the only exemption before signing.
Report thisBy middle.american, September 18, 2007 at 8:16 am #
I will not support any candidate who proposes Universal coverage that sends even ONE DOLLAR to the Health Insurance industry. Tax payer dollars must go directly to the health care providers not the middlemen.
Report thisBy middle.american, September 18, 2007 at 7:51 am #
Health Care for all in the form of an individually FORCED expenditure to health insurance companies? To Hades with that you corporate shills. It is the uneccesary, unregulated expenditures to health insurance companies like HMOs that have kept American’s from getting affordeable healthcare to begin with. Her plan is to throw more money into this corrupt system? Her plan is to FORCE every citizen to buy unaffordeable insurance… to give their hard earned money to these companies who have made a killing from fleecing Amerians by denying to pay for services. Are you kidding? How dare you!? It’s time to cut out the middleman! Medicare for all. Government bargaining on behalf of the people is the only path to affordeable health care.
Report thisBy mary, September 18, 2007 at 7:20 am #
No plan will work until “profit” driven insurance companies are gone. Why can’t we have tax payer supported healthcare that is affordable for everyone and paid for by everyone. “For Profit” is the key problem here....
Report thisBy kelt65, September 18, 2007 at 7:11 am #
What a shilling crap article for Hillary, yet another imperialist, corporate swine who wants to siphon public funds to bloat the insurance and pharma industries.
“Political ju-jitsu”???
Pah .. lease .. that was really, really, bad.
Report thisBy Leefeller, September 18, 2007 at 6:01 am #
This article does not say anything new, nothing at all. It does provides insight into what we can expect from Hillary, absolutely nothing new. Hillary is Bush Lite, her political promises are carried in manure spreaders. Hillary offers us Business as usual, I say it again, we are doomed to status quo.
The Democrats have shown their hand, they have become Neocon lite?
Congress just like this article, provides no substance for the American people.
Report thisBy lodipete, September 18, 2007 at 5:33 am #
Over the weekend,Tiger Woods won over a million dollars for a few days of golf. Federal Express spent millions on an advertising gimmick sponsoring this “event” called the FedEx cup. Alex Rodriguez signed a contract for 250 million dollars because he’s good at a kid’s game. Britney Spears and other “divas” make millions because they can shake their rumps better than 42nd street hookers. This country seems to have no problem enriching mediocrities for meaningless trivialities. And yet, universal healthcare and public education catch hell because of their socialist tendencies? Has the USA gone mad?
Report thisBy Jeanine Molloff, September 18, 2007 at 5:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
E.J. Dione’s report is akin to a bad case of hemorhoids; irritating and uneeded. Indeed, it’s the gift that just keeps on giving. Does Hillary think everyone’s stupid but her? This ‘plan’ is nothing more than another patch on this old, worn out crazy quilt of inefficient con games. WE DON’T WANT PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES ANY MORE; WE DEMAND SINGLE PAYER, MEDICARE FOR ALL. To claim that this will be funded through a combination of repealing tax cuts to the wealthy and giving companies inducements to be less wasteful, translates into forced coverage/forced purchase of private insurance, less treatment options for sicker patients and increased gag rules on doctors. We need to fund this through our taxes. If we ended the Iraq War NOW; the money would go to this new single payer system, and NO FURTHER TAXES WOULD BE NEEDED. THINK ABOUT IT; WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE, HEALTH CARE FOR ALL OR CONTINUE THE OCCUPATION IN IRAQ WHICH IS KILLING OUR YOUNG? I DON’T SEE THE GOOD SENATOR SENDING CHELSEA TO FIGHT IN IRAQ. IN SUMMARY, THE RICH DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO SEPARATE HEALTH CARE; WE SHOULD ALL GET THE SAME KIND OF HEALTH CARE AS THE SENATOR, (which by the way--is RUN BY THE GOVERNMENT). This is nothing more than a con job disguised as ‘universal coverage.’ Again, we DEMAND SINGLE PAYER--MEDICARE FOR ALL. Nothing else is acceptable. FOR MY VOTE AND TAX DOLLAR--I’M SUPPORTING KUCCINICH. Hillary can go back to her insurance company executive friends and play in traffic for all I care.
Jeanine Molloff
Report thisBy adamjohn12, September 18, 2007 at 5:05 am #
What kind of slop article is this? I can’t believe this garbage is next to the most recent Chris Hedges article?
“this year’s most daring act of political jujitsu”
Is truthdig paying the author, or the Democratic Party? This is about the exciting Horse-race of the “Big 3!” Democratic candidates - it’s has no facts in it… I mean read it again… it actually has NO FACTS ABOUT HEALTHCARE IN IT…
This website is turning into a joke, zmag.org actually has some real content.
Report thisBy KISS, September 18, 2007 at 4:29 am #
I wonder if this will be cozy uniting the Insurance industry to another Plan D drug program to richen the coffers of Insurance treasuries?
Report this