LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Holiday Scheer! Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
 
December 2, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Afghanistan in Crisis

Report: WMD Terror Attack Likely

Confronting the Terrorist Within

Bush’s 11th-Hour Bid for Secrecy

They’re Here, They’re Queer, and They’re … Well-Organized

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

The Bigger Bathroom Picture

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Sep 5, 2007

By Ellen Goodman

BOSTON—Well, that didn’t take long. A mere five days from the Roll Call revelations to the presumed resignation. Thirty-three years of public service down the toilet, and that is the last bathroom joke I’ll make. 

When Larry Craig got caught in a sex sting in a Minneapolis airport restroom, Republican stalwarts broke the speed record turning him from the distinguished senator into the disgusting senator. Gay rights groups did not rise to the defense of their public enemy. The only politician expressing actual empathy for Craig was Jim McGreevey, the “outed” former governor of New Jersey who is now—you cannot make this stuff up—in divinity school.

By Tuesday, even Idahoans thought it was all over. The most popular news on the Idaho Statesman website was about a woman rock climber who got her long hair caught in the ropes while she rappelling.

Now what’s happening? It looks like Craig’s “intention to resign” left a loophole as wide as his stance. If he can fight off the charges to which he pleaded guilty, his spokesman and his lawyer now say, he may not resign.

I have no desire to throw myself between Craig and the madding crowd. He was never my kind of senator. I don’t want to send my grandson into a public restroom used for assignations. Nor do I enjoy watching another humiliated wife standing by her husband.

But I have to agree with Sen. Arlen Specter in separating the law from the lewd, the criminal from the yucky. What law did this sad sack of a 62-year-old senator with his ludicrous explanations actually break?

Craig was charged with violating privacy under what is essentially a peeping tom law. The charge was dropped because it would never have held up. He then pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct. But what exactly was the disorder or the conduct? Soliciting sex in a public place? In fact, all he actually did was tap his feet and put his hand under a stall. As Dale Carpenter at the University of Minnesota Law School notes, there was no specific sexual allegation, no indecent exposure, no money, no abuse, and the other man—the policeman—tapped back. “Can’t you send ambiguous signals in Minnesota without it being a crime?” asks Carpenter.

The stinger, lest you forget, was a 29-year-old police officer with a master’s degree. He must have been trained in gay codes before being assigned to sit in bathrooms waiting for a flirtatious shoe. Isn’t there a murder to be solved in Minneapolis? 

Sex stings to catch gays have been around for more than a century. Sodomy itself was illegal in Minnesota until 2001. It was a “crime against nature” in Idaho, punishable by five years to life in prison. Then in 2003, the Supreme Court finally overturned all the laws against sodomy.

Today, the same people who couldn’t legally have sex can get legally married in Massachusetts, and form civil unions or partnerships in six other states. In the midst of the Craig debacle, an Iowa court briefly allowed gay marriage. But last fall, Idaho joined the vast majority of states in voting to ban it. 

What a time of duality. Leading Democratic candidates for president flocked to a gay forum and pledged allegiance to civil unions—but not marriage. Many Republican pols split between private acceptance and public hostility, welcoming Mary Cheney’s baby and rousing the religious right. Even Craig’s son, while supporting his father’s denial, added, “Gay or straight, that part doesn’t matter.”

Yet the stings go on. Craig was only one of 40 arrested since May in Minneapolis. There were 45 arrested in the Atlanta airport this year. How many elsewhere? There must be saner ways to keep a restroom from becoming a meeting ground, better than using a dubious law that shames men into pleading guilty for the same reason Craig did: humiliation and the fear of exposure. “I don’t call media,” said the policeman. But exposure often follows. So too, the loss of a license or a lifetime of registering as a sex offender.

Craig is trapped in the time warp of same-sex relationships that now run from anonymity to marriage, from the closet to the altar. How much does it—“gay or straight”—matter to the man who grew up on a cattle ranch, studied in a one-room school, became student body president at the University of Idaho, and then a senator?

Whether he resigns or not, I hope Craig does fight the charge against him. “I am not gay,” he insists. Indeed, he’s fought gay rights at every turn. How perfect if his last public service is taking the anti-gay venom out of the sting?

Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at)globe.com.

© 2007, Washington Post Writers Group

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Bush's Baghdad Shell Game

Next item: Iraq Is Still a Failure

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Suzanne, September 26, 2007 at 12:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Come on, John. Would the cost of a sign be more than manning restrooms with police?  As to the violation of speed laws, Larry Craig would tell you the risk of ignoring a restroom sign wouldn’t be worth taking.  Also, responsible parents might accompany their children into restrooms.

Report this

By John Borowski, September 15, 2007 at 10:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

My dearest ProfessorVP: You’re not much on intelligence. I’m not talking about the Republicans that want to separate from a doggy pile. (The same Republicans that embraced him before the scandal and most likely knew about his orientation) I’m talking about the media (TV, newspaper, magazines, right wing talk shows) that the seventy-five per cent of the population that have dim bulbs and is exposed to this type of media and gobble it up. If I was a Republican, I would be ashamed of the intensive care of this country the Republicans have placed it.

While I’m at it, I’ll kill two birds with one stone. I’m talking about signs. They have sixty-five mph signs on the highway, how many obey them? Most lemmings believe if you are not doing at least fifteen mph over the speed limit you are not a good driver. Another example is drug free school zone signs. Let’s take a hypothetical situation. Two “druggos” are walking down the street and one sees the drug free school zone sign. The criminal says to the other”druggo” that we can’t sell the heroin to the 5 year olds here. The other “druggo” says why not? The other criminal say we don’t want to disobey the sign, let’s go down to the next block to sell the heroin to the 5 year olds. Can you imagine the cost to make the signs, install them, and maintain them? One could have a police officer standing in front of the school instead. Intelligent Americans (The twenty-five percent) should feel insulted by these signs. The politicians must have a good laugh at the puerile qualities of many Americans.

Report this

By John Borowski, September 15, 2007 at 4:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

What many people overlook is just because the toilet room folks are on the toilet bowl with their pants down and their legs wide open doesn’t mean they are soliciting.
There are two types of men. (The circumcised and the uncircumcised) The circumcised folks shoot a stream like an arrow straight into the toilet bowl. The folks that are uncircumcised will at times experience a phenomenon where the foreskin gets in the way of the stream. This will produce a “shot gun” like stream) When a toilet room folk has the latter condition he will have his pants down and legs wide open. This will successfully prevent his tie or his pants from being sprinkled. I won a court case based on this reasoning.
This is why many women put a verse in their bathroom that goes like this.
If you sprinkle when you tinkle, be a sweetee and wipe the seatee.

Report this

By shz, September 15, 2007 at 12:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The police don’t arrest “gays”.  They arrest perverts, gay or straight.

I agree with the idea of a sign in restrooms stating that the place is monitored.

Thanks to the police who arrest these guys.  Public restrooms, and other public places should be safe for our children.  For that matter, no adult should have to put up with such indignities.

Report this

By eltiburon, September 12, 2007 at 10:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This article was just so much drivel.
A law has been violated.
The policeman did not know that the person in the stall next to him was a senator.
A public restroom is for the use intended and not for sexual consignments.
Does this put Craig’s Senate seat in question?
Yes, as noted in his homophobic tirades while in office and his homosexual behavior in public, I would be suspect of any sense of judgement that Craig may have.

Report this

By Suzanne, September 12, 2007 at 7:53 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The answer to the question “Isn’t there a better way to secure an airport bathroom than the institutionalized entrapment and humiliation of gay men?” is absolutely yes.  All it would take is a sign at the entrance stating “This restroom may be monitored by law enforcement.”

Report this

By ProfessorVP, September 9, 2007 at 9:00 am #

Borrowski, you’re not much on reading.  McCain denounced Craig and Romney fired Craig’s ass off his campaign and trashed him.  The Republicans took away his positions on important committees.  Fellow right-wing gay Mitch McConnell said Craig would be investigated.  Only one Republican has come to the defense of Larry Craig- the moderate Arlen Spector.
Fearing Craig as a burden in next year’s elections, the Right Wing has abandoned Craig, rightfully so.

Report this

By John Borowski, September 8, 2007 at 1:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

When Democrat McGreevy announced in NJ that he is a homosexual the right in that state were foaming at the mouth demanding he resign immediately. When Democrat Clinton had a heterosexual doing, the right foamed at the mouth demanding an impeachment. When Republican Craig was caught, you hear nothing from the right.

Report this

By Paracelsus, September 8, 2007 at 10:59 am #

If Larry Craig wanted to have sex with a man, he should have gone to a pickup joint, not a men’s room.

Report this

By Frank Cajon, September 7, 2007 at 5:43 pm #

If I solicit a prostitute and it turns out to be a police sting, I am going to get arrested. I can understand the author’s concerns to a point, but gay or straight, the law is the law. As for police procedures, I support the cleanup of prostitution in my community and the gay restroom pickup cleanups as well, and I am no right-wing neocon by any stretch. I think there is a place for everything and what Craig had in mind should have been done in a private hotel room. He is, like most GOP figures, trying to be held to a double standard, to have a special re-do of the law because, basically, he is a hypocrite. He should just come out about his sexual preference, or say it is no one’s business, and resign, having confessed to one of the more sordid recent acts since the Congressional pages were being hit up for dates last year.

Report this

By ProfessorVP, September 7, 2007 at 10:57 am #

I’ve never seen it either, bestpix.  I’ve also never seen rape, murder, auto theft or other crimes.  Doesn’t mean they don’t happen.  This is the childish argument certain people used to defend OJ Simpson murdering his wife and her friend.  “Were you there?  Did you see it?” This sort of thing should never be said by anyone over the age of eight.

Larry Craig got busted playing footsie and handsie.  Not assigning a police detail in this complaint-ridden restroom, putting the cop elsewhere, would not increase national security, cure leukemia or end world hunger.  Can we all, as Joan Rivers says, grow up?

Report this

By bestpix, September 7, 2007 at 7:55 am #

PEOPLE Please!  How big a problem can this (sex in public rstrms) really be ?  Have YOU EVER walked in on sex in a restroom ? 

I’m 57 yrs old and have lived in LA, SF, Denver, Miami, and I have NEVER walked in on someone having sex in a restroom.  My 50yrs+ associate from work has lived in NY, & LA, and he also has NEVER walked in on sex. 

Oh Yeah, it’s a really good use of police !

Report this

By ProfessorVP, September 7, 2007 at 12:02 am #

Ellen, you are flat-out wrong.  I can’t claim to know what goes on in women’s public restrooms, but you wouldn’t like to see somebody’s hand cross between her partition and yours, would you? 

You also make your own verdict, Your Honor, why the peeping charge was dropped- because it wouldn’t stand.  That’s your take, Ms. Goodman.  I think it was an act of generosity.  But just watch: if Larry is able to take back his guilty plea and start over, the peeping charge will go right back.

“What law has Craig broken?” some folks bleat, as if this was some figment of people’s imagination.  Yes, Ellen, he broke two laws and pled guilty to one.  This particular column is the silliest on the topic, with the except of Arianna Huffington’s, which essentially claimed that what with the threat of terrorism, why are there cops in restroom stings?- as if that cop in the Minneapolis bathroom was taken off The Bin Laden Case.  Sheesh!

Report this

By tyler, September 6, 2007 at 3:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Isn’t it sad that most men that are gay have to live their ENTIRE lives in secret.  Can you even imagine having to do that for a just a week? 

Whats remarkable is that those who most vehemently oppose homosexuality probably do that to cover their own lives, eg. ted haskin.

Report this

By vet240, September 6, 2007 at 12:48 pm #

I think the police stated they had received complaints about this problem from persons using the facilities at this airport before they decided to do a sting (ouch! that’s gotta hurt!). I wouldn’t be surprised they picked the time and place on the basis of past complaints. They probably could pin-point the flight times etc. No doubt Larry was part of the problem as he “used” these seats many times on the way to and from The Seat in DC!

Report this

By Danielle Day, September 6, 2007 at 11:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The airport police received a complaint about Craig’s behavior and sent an officer to investigate. Thank you officer.

Report this

By vet240, September 6, 2007 at 10:45 am #

Regardless fo Larry and his efforts to turn this around, he is dead in the water.

On the one hand he is guilty of being a lying hipocrite, who has been lying to his constituentsy for 30 years.

On the other hand he is guilty of being a lying hipocrite, who has been lying to his constituentsy for 30 years!

So how many of you Idahoans are going to the poll and re-electing this piece of mountain goat dung?!!!

Report this

By farmertx, September 6, 2007 at 10:28 am #

If an innocent Congress Critter pled guilty to a lesser offense “to make it go away” he is too dumb to serve the people.
Any innocent person would have demanded a polygraph and a full fledged investigation rather than trying to sweep it under the rug.
What any pervert does that doesn’t involve kids is their business. Public areas of any kind is not the place for such business.
Arlen Spector was right in thinking that he might have beat the charge. There was no overt sexual act or request for one.
As an over the road driver for many years I have had to use public bathrooms. I too spread my kness to keep my pants off the floor while sitting. Never once have I found it necessary to place my foot under a partition to accomplish that.
Had I seen a foot or hand appear under the partition, it would have been stepped on or burned. A stall is a place for needed privacy and any intrusion is not to be welcomed nor condoned.
Maybe the Brown One can return and issue a ruling allowing Craig to retract his guilty plea.
Hopefully no one else will and this story will die along with Craigs’ career and reputation.

Report this

By C.P.T.L., September 6, 2007 at 10:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Once again Ellen Goodman gives us a kind of synopsis of what we were considering days ago, resubmitted to our re-consideration.

If it were just the commentary minus the questions maybe… but to ask the questions but NOT answer them… ANY of them… I find myself asking, ‘why am I being presented with someone else’s simple perplexity in the place where questions GET ANSWERED… a newspaper?

What is the opinion of experienced judges, law enforcement and legal scholars about how to stop public sex where it isn’t wanted, but not be draconian or retrograde?

Is it all so threatening? What is the general consensus of psychologists?

Since gay and bi men ‘cruising’ public restrooms isn’t going to stop or go away anytime soon, what have other more enlightened societies done about the phenomenon, or problem?

Report this

By Dr. M, September 6, 2007 at 8:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

So simple to design toilets to prevent improper use: stalls with dividers going all the way to the floor, for example. This sad man, now caught in a web that he has encouraged in his public homophobia activities is now himself a victim of the US hysteria about sexual orientation. Pathetic behaviour by both the victim and the victimizer who would do a better public service by writing parking tickets...or even by just eating doughnuts.

Report this

By dot kostriken, September 6, 2007 at 8:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Sympathy for Craig’s “wife & sons” is misplaced; he, in fact married in 1983 when fear of being caught in the DC pages scandal was going on; he married the perfect cover; a woman w/ three sons; he fathered none of them. He may never have had heterosexual sex. His hypocrisy is pathetic; I wish he’d had compassion for others.but his viscious comments about Clinton, are now coming home to roost. Hope his wife’s sons were not molested.

Report this

By Jacks, September 6, 2007 at 5:46 am #

The only problem I have with the Craig situation is having sex in public.  That was not borne out of homophobia, but simply the thrill of public sex.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, September 6, 2007 at 5:35 am #

Have sex in private, unless you’re an animal.  Mik 98859 is on the mark.  If you don’t have a partner, either do yourself or deny yourself, if you believe public venues are your only option.  Promiscuous gays who use public venues do the gay cause no good because straights link the public gay sex act with bad judgement/choices, among other negatives.  Do your brothers and sisters a service and do it at home.

Report this

By JaneDoe242, September 6, 2007 at 5:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s not an issue of homosexuality - its about hypocrisy. Here is a man who has done everything in his power to vote down any rights for homosexuals meanwhile he’s seeking gay anonymous sex in public bathrooms.

Yes, there are a billion more important things that need to be taken care of but do you really want to entrust those decisions to men such as Senator Craig who obviously have such imapired judgement?? Do you really want someone like this representing you in government? Congress and the White House are full of these types of people which is why we are where we are today.

Report this

By Frikken Kids, September 6, 2007 at 4:56 am #

This author seems to think that only major crimes should be investigated:  “Isn’t there a murder to be solved in Minneapolis?”

Should we stop arresting thieves because murderers are on the loose and haven’t yet been caught?  What about white collar criminals?  Should they be ignored by the police because they aren’t murderers? 

This is, of course, ridiculous.  Police departments have different units or divisions to deal with different types of crimes.  Some handle traffic, some handle robbery, some drugs, etc…

You can’t criticize an arrest because there are more serious criminals somewhere else.  And making this a gay issue doesn’t seem right either.  People soliciting or engaging in heterosexual sex in a public washroom would be arrested too.

Report this

By Groovesmoothly, September 6, 2007 at 3:32 am #

Thank you.

In the words of our forefathers, stop hunting witches you puritanical douche-bags. That goes double for the hypocrites, Larry Craig.

Unless the threat level has dropped to green, all of our constitutional rights have been restored and the executive branch has been put back in their place, there are are more pressing issues to attend to at our nation’s airports. This is the kind of crap that makes my blood boil every time my property taxes go up due a shortage of law enforcement.

Let’s get rid of bad congressmen for better reasons than being caught being “naughty boys”. Besides, soliciting for sex does not imply “barebacking” in front of children anymore than men hitting on women in airport bars does. If you catch him doing it in front of kids and people who don’t want to see that bust him, otherwise leave him (and the rest of us) alone. Please. While you’re at it, lose the cameras going up all over the place, too. Not cool.

Now, can we get back to how we’re not going to allow for the carpet bombing of Iran and how we’re going to get out of Iraq and Afghanistan?

Report this

By THOMAS BILLIS, September 6, 2007 at 2:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ms Goodman a thoughtful and relevant article in this era of we are all suspects until we prove ourselves innocent.Although I find Larry Craig to be a reprehensible human being I will fight to the death his right not to be railroaded.The key to freedom and due process is to fight for it even when the person is a human being whose political views you find despicable.

Report this

By Mik, September 5, 2007 at 9:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is a dumb article.  This guy is a creep, just like everyone else who does this sort of thing in a PUBLIC restroom.  There are children and people who don’t really want to see two guys barebacking each other.  This has nothing to do with gay, gay guys go to clubs etc.  Dumb article....

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.