|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
Bush’s Baghdad Shell GamePosted on Sep 5, 2007By Joe Conason As the deadline approaches for official assessments of American policy in Iraq, the Bush administration is maintaining a steady barrage of diversions, obfuscations and manipulations. These great clouds of smoke, emanating from Washington’s think tanks and the mainstream media as well as the press offices of the White House and the Pentagon, have a single purpose: to blind us to objective realities so that the war can continue indefinitely. The arguments change but the underlying style remains the same. Since they’re losing the debate, they want to change the subject. When congressional leaders sought to schedule hearings on two important Iraq reports—one from the Government Accountability Office and another by an independent commission of military experts—they invited U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker and Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of American forces, to testify. The Pentagon flacks tried to schedule those appearances for Sept. 11—a ridiculous maneuver properly rejected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Changing the subject has been the primary theme of this misadventure from the beginning. In the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney wanted to shift the American response from al-Qaida and the Taliban to Iraq’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction.” When the U.S. ousted Saddam Hussein and those weapons could not be found, the grounds for war changed from U.S. security to the democratic and humanitarian transformation of “the new Mideast.” And now we are back to the “war on terror,” with our aims reduced to extirpating al-Qaida in Iraq (an organization that did not exist until the U.S. invasion) and preventing the spread of Iranian influence in the region (evidently by propping up Tehran’s allies in Baghdad). Looking back over this kaleidoscopic assortment of claims and theories, there is no logical pattern, no factual rigor, no acknowledgment of realities that don’t fit preconceived scripts. There is only and always the next evasion of responsibility for a disastrous foreign policy, based on a vacant-minded whim, that has cost many thousands of lives and squandered our treasure and prestige. The latest version of the same old game comes under the rubric of “benchmarks.” Rather than accept the judgment of the Iraq Study Group and start to wind down the war toward a negotiated peace and withdrawal, the president and his advisers insisted on a troop escalation, which they called “the surge.” The Republicans in Congress, fearful of their increasingly angry constituents, imposed a price for support of the surge. Within six months, Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker would be required to report on progress, or lack thereof, toward a list of major objectives in stabilizing and securing Iraq. Advertisement The first sign came weeks ago, when the Pentagon escorted certain defense analysts from Washington on a tour that highlighted the surge’s successes. Among those analysts were Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution, both longtime supporters of the war who now occasionally disguise themselves as critics. Pollack in particular has earned a perpetual place in obscurity for his prewar book touting the imminent nuclear threat from Saddam, which didn’t actually exist. With the help of The New York Times op-ed page, they launched the latest sophistry, which now turns up everywhere, often under the bylines of the same gang that helped to conceive the war and the surge. We are now making great strides in places such as Anbar province, they say, where Sunni insurgent sheiks have abandoned al-Qaida in favor of an alliance with us. If only we continue the surge, and expand it, then someday we will be able to wind down the occupation, and shrink it. What this argument neglects to address, of course, is the real situation on the ground in Iraq and the reasons why the Sunni sheiks might suddenly seek our assistance. Those warlords need our help because they are under constant assault by the Shiite-dominated army and police. Violence continues unabated and the trend toward civil war has not been halted. There is virtually no progress toward the benchmarks of stability and reconciliation, which were supposedly the original aims of the surge. Tomorrow we will be assured that those benchmarks never really mattered or can’t really be measured, or something like that. Don’t look there! Look over here! It is the traditional cry of the shell game, except that these bets are much too high. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By rbrooks, September 7, 2007 at 9:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hey! Look over here! It’s another video with the latest fake bin Laden!
The usual convenient timing - good for a couple of weeks of donder und blitzen on CNN while the real news happens, way over there.
What’s arguably scariest about this is that they apparently don’t even have to worry about how obvious this stuff is. Well, we have to get our jollies where we can. At least it will be entertaining to see if they can come up with a better bin Laden than the guy who confessed to 9/11.
Report thisBy Outraged, September 6, 2007 at 11:22 pm Link to this comment
Quote: “Looking back over this kaleidoscopic assortment of claims and theories, there is no logical pattern, no factual rigor, no acknowledgment of realities that dont fit preconceived scripts. There is only and always the next evasion of responsibility for a disastrous foreign policy, based on a vacant-minded whim, that has cost many thousands of lives and squandered our treasure and prestige.”
I disagree Joe, it’s been orchestrated quite artfully. The things that have transpired were willful and purposeful. Everyone worldwide with an ounce of sanity knows that something has run amok.
Chaos is always on your side as long as you are not in it. Let’s not forget we have many top neocons at home, in their leisure, constructing new and more credible ways to create confusion.
Suddenly W is running around the world “meeting” with this crooked Joe Shmoe and that one. Why…? Something is up. It reeks of something even more atrocious than attacking Iran.
All of it of course is about “trade”. What’s W’s sudden interest in trade. Remember, he’s the decider, the commander in chief, macho, macho man. Suddenly, he’s the shopper’s best buddy? We don’t know what transpired during the SSP “conferences” in Canada. What are these “trade” talks he’s having in Austraila…....and now he’s talking about “democracy” for Burma? And something is up in Haiti.
Quote from Yves Engler article, Haiti and the Responsibility to Protect.
“Once again the Haitian people and government are being forced along an economic path dictated by the world’s economic elite and I fear the result will be the same as before. Of the $1.2 billion in “aid” for Haiti announced at a Washington donors’ conference in July 2004, more than half was loans, which Haitians must repay. Haitians will have to repay this money even though they did not choose the Gerard Latortue regime that got most of the money, the US, France and Canada did.”
Somethings up and it isn’t Iran, at least not yet. Of course we’d believe he’d attack Iran, because he would….....if he had to, to attain his master plan. I think he qualifies it as “any port in a storm”.
Report thisBy purplewolf, September 6, 2007 at 8:17 pm Link to this comment
# 98972 scurvybro:
I,too,thought they needed to grow a backbone and considered steriods to help boost this. Upon further research,it was decided by the best medical experts, Dr. Who, who was called in from the future,recommended that a spinal transplant was the only hope in which to achieve this outcome.
Report thisBy PACRAT, September 6, 2007 at 6:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Petraeus or Betrayus Report
Did anyone (except democratic leadership) really believe that an objective evaluation of the Iraq situation would surface without White House editing? Are we all fools, or what?
Bush clearly intends to let his mistakes ride and US and Iraqi deaths to mount to the task of the next president. The House of Shame (formerly known as the White House) is doing its usual dirty propaganda routine about the great progress the so call surge is making - good news, the green zone is safe again! And we will have enough troops, helicopters, and snipers available for visiting republican congress persons to walk around Baghad and other centers freely.
When will congress get the guts to withstand neocon name calling and make the decisions most Americans want - bring our troops home - NOW!
Report thisBy scurvybro, September 6, 2007 at 12:24 pm Link to this comment
That Bush and his band of neocon enablers and apologists would engage in flim-flammery should be greeted with zero surprise. What’s tragically sad is that their brand of snake oil is finding eager buyers in the media and, unfortunately, among some Democrats.
Sadly, this, too, is becoming all too predictable. Is there any way to accelerate evolution so that Democrats can develop a spine?
Report thisBy ocjim, September 6, 2007 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment
Such shell games have been played by many politicians in the past but never with such high stakes and never accompanied with so much subterfuge and deception. The pity is that the corporate media now lends so much support, the public is mired in narcissistic materialism, and accordingly basks in apathy. Knowing this, after 9/11 Rove had Bush shush the public like children and tell them to shop. Leave the bogus war and the unplanned occupation in the Bush administration’s incompetent hands. But their attitude followed the philosophical precepts of Leo Strauss. The masses are to be led by the elite who know best what is good for them. Bush and Co considered themselves the elite…and in spite of gross incompetence, still do.
Report thisBy flotron9, September 6, 2007 at 10:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Gerald B. Helman writes along similar lines in today’s “Informed Comment.” http://www.juancole.com/2007/09/helman-bushs-stage-managed-photo-op.html
Just like before the invasion, there are voices out there speaking the truth, but the corporate/Pentagon powered media shout them down.
Report thisBy Marjorie L. Swanson, September 6, 2007 at 5:41 am Link to this comment
Benchmarks have outlived their Republican Talking Point shelf-life just like WMD, we’ll stand down when they stand up and other simplistic b.s.
And the Bush Administration can’t even play the shell game fairly. There really wasn’t a pea under any of the shells. Just hot air.
Report thisBy Lizzie, September 6, 2007 at 3:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Shades of 1984 George Orwell, continuous war between the regions is what drives the economy and keeps the people in servitude. Plus a whole lot more
“Who are we fighting this month and why?”
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, September 6, 2007 at 3:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Joe you can dance around it all you want but the democrats are ennablers in chief of this President.Hillary saying there have been successes in the recent surge.That congressman from Washington coming back from a trip to Iraq and claiming we should stay longer.It is like the debate between Intelligent design and evolution.With the war of course being Intelligent Design.When you lend credence to absurd propisitions the debate is not engaged properly.This is not a republican or democratic issue. It is who loves this country enough to step above party and start the discussion at which is the better of disasters.There is no good solution in Iraq and when the democrats wrap their message around that fact and start us down the path of the least worst we will all be better served.
Report thisBy purplewolf, September 6, 2007 at 1:44 am Link to this comment
When the day arrives and the reports are read,the prez,he will do as in the past when advise from the Iraq Study Group recommended the best options on the war, he chose to ignore commonsense and logic and go ahead with more mistakes.(My daughter told me that people today have no commonsense as they do not teach it in schools.) I remember when commonsense was a given.
Bush could do what was done to the Natives in America. Round them all up, keep them in their cement prison cities(we call them reservations) and turn them over to the Department of the Interior like they did over here. Assimilate them to the english language, preferred religion, they can wait for rations that never come and have every promise made(treaty) broken except for one.“WE will take your land” and they will.Just like over here.
Having traveled the red road for many years I sold items I made, but also sold books. I had a elder come into my powwow booth one day with a young oriental college student,this elder man picked up a copy of “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee,” and told this student him he needs to read this book,and to never ever let America come in his country because they will do to China everything they did to the first peoples of this land.
Report thisBy Harry Beard, September 5, 2007 at 11:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Our government here in Australia is just as stupid.To the point I’ve stopped referring to myself as Australian,now I just run with Earthing.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, September 5, 2007 at 10:37 pm Link to this comment
Joe Conason does sort of scratch the surface here. He might’ve continued the “shell game” metaphor a good deal further, however, by acknowledging that the “Iraq war” itself, and indeed the entire so-called “global war on terror,” are also only empty shells in “the great game” of establishing a worldwide dictatorship-of-the-plutoligarchy….with the other 99-plus % of tame Two-Leggeds “enjoying” the permanently degraded status of livestock.
Lucky for all-concerned, us surviving free wild natural peoples have already proven too tough a “nut” for the tormentors to crack. Time now for everyone to take their Medicine. We’re it, too.
HokaHey!
Report this