LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Questioning 9/11 ... With Caution

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Aug 30, 2007
ground zero
AP Photo / Mark Lennihan

Aftermath:  Ground Zero in New York City.

By Robert Fisk

Originally posted in The Independent.

Each time I lecture abroad on the Middle East, there is always someone in the audience – just one – whom I call the “raver”. Apologies here to all the men and women who come to my talks with bright and pertinent questions – often quite humbling ones for me as a journalist – and which show that they understand the Middle East tragedy a lot better than the journalists who report it. But the “raver” is real. He has turned up in corporeal form in Stockholm and in Oxford, in Sao Paulo and in Yerevan, in Cairo, in Los Angeles and, in female form, in Barcelona. No matter the country, there will always be a “raver”.

His – or her – question goes like this. Why, if you believe you’re a free journalist, don’t you report what you really know about 9/11? Why don’t you tell the truth – that the Bush administration (or the CIA or Mossad, you name it) blew up the twin towers? Why don’t you reveal the secrets behind 9/11? The assumption in each case is that Fisk knows – that Fisk has an absolute concrete, copper-bottomed fact-filled desk containing final proof of what “all the world knows” (that usually is the phrase) – who destroyed the twin towers. Sometimes the “raver” is clearly distressed. One man in Cork screamed his question at me, and then – the moment I suggested that his version of the plot was a bit odd – left the hall, shouting abuse and kicking over chairs.

Usually, I have tried to tell the “truth”; that while there are unanswered questions about 9/11, I am the Middle East correspondent of The Independent, not the conspiracy correspondent; that I have quite enough real plots on my hands in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Iran, the Gulf, etc, to worry about imaginary ones in Manhattan. My final argument – a clincher, in my view – is that the Bush administration has screwed up everything – militarily, politically diplomatically – it has tried to do in the Middle East; so how on earth could it successfully bring off the international crimes against humanity in the United States on 11 September 2001?

Well, I still hold to that view. Any military which can claim – as the Americans did two days ago – that al-Qaida is on the run is not capable of carrying out anything on the scale of 9/11. “We disrupted al-Qaida, causing them to run,” Colonel David Sutherland said of the preposterously code-named “Operation Lightning Hammer” in Iraq’s Diyala province. “Their fear of facing our forces proves the terrorists know there is no safe haven for them.” And more of the same, all of it untrue.

Advertisement

Within hours, al-Qaida attacked Baquba in battalion strength and slaughtered all the local sheikhs who had thrown in their hand with the Americans. It reminds me of Vietnam, the war which George Bush watched from the skies over Texas – which may account for why he this week mixed up the end of the Vietnam war with the genocide in a different country called Cambodia, whose population was eventually rescued by the same Vietnamese whom Mr Bush’s more courageous colleagues had been fighting all along.

But – here we go. I am increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It’s not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93’s debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? Again, I’m not talking about the crazed “research” of David Icke’s Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster – which should send any sane man back to reading the telephone directory.

I am talking about scientific issues. If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September? Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it? The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings. They have not yet reported on WTC 7. Two prominent American professors of mechanical engineering – very definitely not in the “raver” bracket – are now legally challenging the terms of reference of this final report on the grounds that it could be “fraudulent or deceptive”.

Journalistically, there were many odd things about 9/11. Initial reports of reporters that they heard “explosions” in the towers – which could well have been the beams cracking – are easy to dismiss. Less so the report that the body of a female air crew member was found in a Manhattan street with her hands bound. OK, so let’s claim that was just hearsay reporting at the time, just as the CIA’s list of Arab suicide-hijackers, which included three men who were – and still are – very much alive and living in the Middle East, was an initial intelligence error.

But what about the weird letter allegedly written by Mohamed Atta, the Egyptian hijacker-murderer with the spooky face, whose “Islamic” advice to his gruesome comrades – released by the CIA – mystified every Muslim friend I know in the Middle East? Atta mentioned his family – which no Muslim, however ill-taught, would be likely to include in such a prayer. He reminds his comrades-in-murder to say the first Muslim prayer of the day and then goes on to quote from it. But no Muslim would need such a reminder – let alone expect the text of the “Fajr” prayer to be included in Atta’s letter.

Let me repeat. I am not a conspiracy theorist. Spare me the ravers. Spare me the plots. But like everyone else, I would like to know the full story of 9/11, not least because it was the trigger for the whole lunatic, meretricious “war on terror” which has led us to disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan and in much of the Middle East. Bush’s happily departed adviser Karl Rove once said that “we’re an empire now – we create our own reality”. True? At least tell us. It would stop people kicking over chairs.

     
     


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By D-F, August 31, 2007 at 9:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

in reference to #97802 by Frank on 8/30 at 7:11 pm,
simply put, if this was the case about the “Tons of debrief” How come no clear footage from the most secure military structure on the earth. Do you really wish that we should believe that there is no clear footage, and even if so, it was years ago, how come they cant release it ... I know your probally even questioning that? If not well…...... I also live 20 minutes form the pentagon, i have seen the cameras all around there, pre-9/11.

Report this

By Adam, August 31, 2007 at 9:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

you state that it’s improbable that the Bush admin carried out 9/11 because they’ve been so incompetent regarding the Iraq war, etc.  I think you’d been hoodwinked.  Incompetent?  Oil men in the White Office causing massive destabilization to the Mid-East, rising oil costs, and giving the Oil Companies the biggest profits ever attributed to any corporation - ever.  Either the administration has the best of luck, or they actually have smart people thinking all of this thru.  Dick Cheney said in 1994 that it would be a quagmire to invade Iraq proper.  Do you just think he forgot?  He’s not stupid.

9/11 has been used as a basic for reducing civil liberties, silencing opposition, giving justification for already planned wars, furthering conservative legislation, lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex, etc.  Wow, that’s some really good luck that came from some pretty bad luck.

Report this

By Ruttledge Moserby, August 31, 2007 at 9:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Popular Mechanics says their were no firefighters in building Seven. Silverstein clarified his statement by saying he meant “Pull the firefighters” from building seven. Don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 31, 2007 at 9:09 am Link to this comment

Frikken Kids:

Can you find your word ‘slaughter’ anywhere in my posts? NO! You can, however, find the word ‘MELT’ - it comes from the Torah! wink

‘Interesting’ name you’ve given yourself, Frikken Kids!

Do you that cursing (especially your opponents) is a Talmudic trademark? You’ll find cursing all over this Blog (by certain people) wink

Report this

By Ian, August 31, 2007 at 8:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m thinking the Bush did it theory has no merit. I’d be more inclined to believe he is being used and performing poorly. The Mossad seems the likely candidate, not cave dwelling people with box cutters. I’d also bet the government has already secretly reached this conclusion and doesn’t know how to handle the backlash that would result. People can’t often make the distinction between Jews and Zionists. No doubt most Jews are being used like the Ted Haggards of the world use Christians.

Report this

By Frikken Kids, August 31, 2007 at 8:53 am Link to this comment

Is this GodSend character actually saying that any day now Americans are going to rise up and slaughter all the Jewish people living in America unless they can prove they’re not Zionists? 

Six million people will be dialing 911?

I suppose threats are okay as long as they are followed by a wink emoticon.

Report this

By joe41704, August 31, 2007 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Webster G. Tarpley

Is his book “9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA” Fourth Edition (Paperback) worthwhile purchasing?

And is his video “9/11 Truth: Webster Tarpley Speaks in Seattle, April 1, 2006” worth the effort or is he making April fools of everyone?

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-609179074068244932&q=webster+tarpley

Report this

By nulldevice, August 31, 2007 at 8:44 am Link to this comment

Good lord.

I tend to automatically discount most conspiracy theories because they require a far too massive investment of resources in order to preserve secrecy. 

That said, I think a lot of ass-covering is being done to hide the incompetance of a LOT of different people with regards to the attacks.  I’m sure there are literally thousands of dirty little secrets that could’ve saved more lives, or prevented the whole thing in the first place, and in the end add up to look like one big secret spooky conspiracy. 

And, it’s not helped by the fact that the current administration was quick to try and profit from the tragedy, to use it to their advantage.  But correlation is not causation - that someone exploits a bad situation to their own ends is not proof they caused the situation - it just means that they’re jerks.

Sadly, the time has long passed for any real, sane debate on this or any other vaguely conspiratorial topic - the insular nature of conspiracy theories cause them to be self-affirming, so you cna’t ever really convince someone that there wasn’t a conspiracy, since by disagreeing you could in fact be a part of it.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 31, 2007 at 8:37 am Link to this comment

Very soon, about 6,000,000 folks will be dialing 911! wink

Report this

By Bryan, August 31, 2007 at 8:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush is not in charge so why do you think his idiotness would be the planning genius to have organized an inside job on 9-11. Sorry but the idea that he pulled it off is ludicrous if anything he’s a manchurian candidate puppet. The real puppet masters are Chenney and his masters in the MIC and fascist corporations who are profiting from the war in Iraq. Every intelligent person I know believes 9-11 was an inside job. Watch terror storm on google video and pay attention with an open mind.

Report this

By Marko51, August 31, 2007 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Follow the money before and after 911. You will find that those who gained were poised to gain.

Those who gained and countine to gain from the 911 incident are most likely the ones involved in this very complex plot. For sure Iran, Iraq or Afganistan did not benefit… if so you, tell me how!

The problem for the 911 truth seeker is the political movements that are trying highjack the issue… Like the socialists… All 911 truth seekers must steer clear of such movements to maintain credibility.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 31, 2007 at 7:59 am Link to this comment

Here’s an ‘interesting’ link and Blog about 9/11:

http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/?q=node/282#comment-2382

Report this

By NewLeft, August 31, 2007 at 7:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The only 2 things that should matter to any member of the 9/11 Truth community-

1) The failure of the world’s most expensive national defense system and the lack of punishments/accountability in relation to that failure

2) The widely acknowledged ties between the CIA, Pakistan’s ISI, and Islamic extremists in Afghanistan (1980s) and beyond.

Factor these two together and no sceptic has an answer. These are the only issues that really matter.

WTC implosions, missing Pentagon planes and scattered debris fields, while intriguing, are unprovable and won’t get us anywhere. Some are probably red herrings.

Wake up, or the Truth movement dies in 2009.

Report this

By Bonanzaman, August 31, 2007 at 7:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

One the biggest questions not asked often enough is who caused the us air force to stand down on 9-11? It’s standard policy is to intercept any commercial flight whose transponder is shut down or loses radio contact. And this doesn’t require any orders from anyone, its policy. 67 times in the previous 8 months they conducted standard intercepts in the US due to slight irregularities. Another major question goes unanswered is who bought all the put options on the airlines and insurance companies? This information is not being released by the SEC. Why and who?

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 31, 2007 at 7:48 am Link to this comment

To all those who are hoping and praying that the Truth about 9/11 will never SEE the light of day:

The Truth is already all over the Web! - and collective consciousness about the biggest hoax and crime in American history is growing every day. Soon it will reach Critical Mass and then….......if you’re a Jew, you had better be ready to explain the difference between a Jew and a Zionist! If you’re a Zionist, your ass will be grass - and 294,000,000 Americans all have lawnmowers and will come looking for you!

America’s Jewish population is said to be 2% of the total population. With a little Einstein math, that makes it approximately 6,000,000 Jews enjoying life in America - so far.

The Truth about 9/11 is already known by many people. Zionists pulled down the WTC towers, etc. - and they pulled many other strings as well (USS Liberty, JFK assassination, Paul Wellstone ‘accidenting’, ‘Israel Lobby’ shenanigans, etc. etc. etc.

9/11 is just the tip of the Zionist iceberg! Soon it (and they) will be MELTED (Ezekiel 22:12-22)

Report this

By Shandooga, August 31, 2007 at 7:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

filtering out comments is dishonest.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, August 31, 2007 at 7:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I do believe that if DogShit EVER faced a fact head-on that contradicted his weird, hateful tin-foil hate nonsense, his head would explode.

So he never does, pretending that the BS agit-prop of neo-nazi web sites is “evidence” and that the REAL evidence must be cooked.

What’s his latest? That the 19 Arabs on the planes are still alive? Go ahead: produce Mohammed Atta—and let’s do the DNA tests on him to prove it’s him.

But for people like DogShit, who have this whole imaginary universe in which the “Zionists”—code-word for Jews—are given magical powers by Satan to act against the best interests of Humanity and God, facts are meaningless.

See, DogShit is a self-proclaimed prophet, claiming God and Jesus talk to him and tell him what’s right and wrong (exactly like another lunatic flake, George W. Bush).  So DogShit doesn’t “need” facts.  He just makes ‘em up and says God told him they are true.

A rational society evaluates psycho-crazy people like DogShit and makes sure he can’t harm himself—or other people.

Unfortunately, the admin of that other tin-foil-hat lunatic, George W. Bush, is so big on secrecy I wonder why they haven’t classified the DC phone book (like Stalin classified the Moscow phone book).  Consequently, rather than open up the files on 9/11 and let air and sun in, they’ve allowed crack-pot ideas to flourish like algae and mold to the point that this thread shows just how quick people are to believe ANYTHING—but especially if it can be used to blame Jews and justify another holocaust.

Think not?  Just watch: DogShit keeps threatening that God will “melt Israel”.

Report this

By Morpheus-El, August 31, 2007 at 7:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is a perfect example of how manipulation of public opinion works. The people that control society have been studying the control of perception and public opinion for over 70 years, and they have it down to a science. In short, all they have to do (statistically speaking) is to make sure that the ‘Official Story’ is more than 2 standard deviations away from the ‘True Story’, and they can be 99.9% sure that 99% of people will never come anywhere close to the truth of the 911-WTC attack and their perpetrators.

It doesn’t matter how much or how many times the Government lies to the people because they are too lazy, mentally incompetent, undereducated, miseducated, brainwashed, mind-controlled, conditioned, servile, conformist to ask the serious questions about this incident. How can any reasonably intelligent person seriously believe anything that comes out of DC? Did OBL or Saddam export all of the manufacturing out of the country, or did the US Govt? Did OBL or Saddam destroy the US Dollar, or did the US Govt? Did OBL or Saddam stand down the entire NORAD and US Air Force or did the US Govt do it? Did OBL or Saddam destroy the US Constitution or did the US Govt do it?

The bottom line is that the majority of Americans are unwilling to face the truth about the evil of the US Govt, and this makes them all complicit in these treasonous activities performed by these govt. agents. But the real deal is that the AMERICAN PEOPLE will suffer the punishment, not the perpetrators of these, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. So when they’re instituting martial law with all the checkpoints and the concentration camps, don’t start complaining about it. Oh yeah. I forgot that I’m a wacko ‘conspiracy theorist’ because I ask questions that aren’t EVER mentioned in the ‘mainstream media’. And everybody knows that once you label somebody a ‘conspiracy theorist’, you don’t have to address ANY of their questions because if they are labelled a ‘conspiracy theorist’, that automatically invalidates and makes false EVERYTHING they’ve ever said or thought in life.  Now that’s intelligence in action…  (NOT)

Report this

By lilmamzer, August 31, 2007 at 7:21 am Link to this comment

Occam’s Razor, people. Occam’s Razor.

Report this

By Steve, August 31, 2007 at 7:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ok, let’s forget that there were people waiving out of those plane-holes that were so hot they melted the whole building. (I think the proper thing to say would be no high-rise EVER fell from fire or plane but 3 did, that day, including WTC 7 which BBC just happened to annnounce it’s collapse 20 min before it happened…THAT’S just a coincidence)Forget the footage of firefighters describing a SERIES of SEQUENTIAL EXPLOSIONS.
How about….WHERE was NORAD, whose sole purpose is to intercept planes. 60 some planes were intercepted, within 15 MINUTES for flying over Crawford, here in Texas, last year. Cheney was conducting 4 live “highjacking” drills, ina bunker, that day. It’s not my opinion, it’s proven fact…..a..ummm…yeah, that’s the ticket! Arabs, with BOXcutters! Coincidence. BUT, SOMEHOW, Norad COULDN’T DO ANYTHING FOR AN hour and a half, EVEN THOUGH everyone knew planes had been highjacked and that we were “under attack”.
Let’s not talk about the PUT OPTIONS, from someone, betting that AMERICAN and UNITED airlines stock would fall. “Someone” bought MILLIONS of $$$ worth of stock options in the days before 911. We’re told thye were bought anonymously…ANONYMOUSLY???? WHAT???
Go buy a cupla millions dolars worth of stock options and tell me how that works for you.
Doesn’t the Pentagon, actually have missle defense weapons? Why didn’t they shoot down the “airplane”, that can’t seem to be in any pictures, from the most camera heavy building in the country. Why not show us the film? At least, the plane was cordial enough to fly all the way around the building and hit and empty wing, under construction, when they could have coasted right in the through front door.
Anyhow, just food for thought.
Nero burned Rome and blamed the Christians, Hitler burned the Reichstag and blamed his enemies, Gulf of Tonkin…ummmm… do I see a pattern, here?
Regardless it allowed them to scare the bejeezus out of everyone long enough for them to lie us into this disasterous war, bourne of evil.
Incompetant?? No, just incompetent enough to get cought for this most treasonous act in history. And the media helped.

God Bless America. Please save my country.

Report this

By Sy Lentzenolonger, August 31, 2007 at 7:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Robert-

It has been 2179 days since 9/11.  The “ravers’ you speak of “rave” at you because they came to the conclusion you now appear to inching toward more than 2000 days ago themselves and are beyond frustrated that the very “news” organizations, reporters and self-purported deep thinkers maintain willful ignorance on this subject and worse: silence.  The “coverage” of 9/11 has been so lame, so superficial, so lacking in any sort of critical analysis either technical or otherwise and so accepting of the preposterous official report, that it seems to many to be conspiratorial.  I personally do not believe that this is conspiracy.  Rather I believe that modern journalism so values “access” that critical thought and disagreement of those “covered” has all but vanished.  The “ravers” are doing what you should have been doing - drawing attention to the truth.  The “ravers” do not have the access, time, and in most cases the writing ability you possess.  Each of them is a call both for the truth and a plea for you to do what they cannot.  Please forgive them their frustration…but look past their appearance to their message.  What if it’s true?

Even though you are several years too late to be leading any original thought on this, on behalf of all of us who want the truth on this subject into the light, I say “welcome aboard and Godspeed”.

You are to late to lead the movement toward truth, but maybe your contribution can be that you were one of the first that broke the dike of ignorance and self deception in the mainstream news.

Report this

By non-conned, August 31, 2007 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ask yourself THIS question; now years later, and following the revealing of the bitter partisanship, manipulative character, and outright duplicity of this administration, whether the anthrax that was sent to Tom Daschel, which was traced as originating in a US government lab, was merely an isolated incident of terrorist activity targeting a high level public servant, or whether it was another PR stunt to promote their war on terror (and while at send a strong message to the highest ranking Democrat)? 

The truth is, even if it is plain as day to me and many others, 9/11’s true story will NEVER be proven.  The damage it would do to this nation at home and around the world would be catastrophic.  I guess its better to just forget about it find out what Britney’s up to today.

Report this

By nonconned, August 31, 2007 at 6:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m sorry, if you can’t see the obvious truth that 9/11 was an inside job, you’re just aren’t seeing the whole picture.  Just like everything else this administration has screwed up, they were sloppy and incompetent in carrying out the operation.  Lucky for them, the one thing they got right was counting on the overall gullibility of the American people.

Report this

By ocjim, August 31, 2007 at 6:16 am Link to this comment

There is an element of truth when Robert Fisk speaks of the incompetence of George W. Bush. But there is another truth about Bush/Rove competence. When it comes to success in what really counts, getting elected (and using fraud, dirty tricks, disenfranchisment, etc), pushing through a flawed—for drug companies—Medicare drug pgm, pushing through a tax cut for the rich, and misleading us into war, Bush/Cheney/Rove excel. The things they fail at are of little interest to them: helping Katrina victims, providing armor for our troops, occupying Iraq effectively. Most of the things they fail at involve helping and caring about people.

Now I’m not saying it’s evidence of a conspiracy. The conspiracy theory is popular because the members of this administration and the neocon mentality have displayed such negative qualities: secrecy, deception, lying, etc.

Report this
Paolo's avatar

By Paolo, August 31, 2007 at 6:07 am Link to this comment

Clearly, there are some serious unanswered questions about 9-11. Unfortunately, there are also a lot of loony questions being asked. This is an ideal situation for the administration, which tries to paint all 9-11 truthers with the same broad brush.

For example, there are those who ask legitimate questions such as: 1) Why did WTC 7 collapse perfectly into its footprint, when it was not hit by an airplane? 2) Why did WTC 1 and 2 also collapse straight down, rather than toppling? 3) Why was there molten steel in the wreckage of WTC 1 and 2, weeks after 9-11?

Then, there are loopy “no airliners” theories, cruise missile theories, and nuclear device theories.

Administration defenders and their compliant media cheerleaders do not differentiate between these two types of questions, as they attempt to discredit all who question 9-11.

But of course, you don’t think the American government would actually lie, do you? Those paragons of virtue and truth? Nah….

Report this

By shines, August 31, 2007 at 6:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is huge.  Robert Fisk is one of the best journalists in the world.  He lends more credibility to seeking some explanation for legitimate inquiry with this one article than five years worth of Alex Jones.

Bravo Mr Robert

Report this

By SL, August 31, 2007 at 5:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

#97729 by M. Kimble on 8/30 at 1:43 pm, you claim the steel would be weakened, but the ACTUAL studies of the building materials PASSed a six hour test of 2,000 degrees F with 100% of it’s rated strength capacity intact.

Go lie somewhere else bud.

Report this

By Frikken Kids, August 31, 2007 at 5:32 am Link to this comment

The last time I posted this link here, I got called a bigot for some reason.  Still, I think the cartoons at the top and bottom of the page are just about the best comment on the conspiracy theories that I have seen.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Report this

By Some Guy, August 31, 2007 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I still don’t know what to make of Mr. Fisk. In this article, as usual with him, he plays it rather fast and loose with (recent) history: Vietnam “rescued” Cambodia? Let’s ask some tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of Cambodians about that. Oh wait, we can’t - they’re dead now, slaughtered by their Vietnamese “rescuers”.
If Fisk has so many suspicions concerning the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, then why does he so abhor the whole concept of alternative conspiracy theories, such as those promulgated by David Icke and so many others? In other words, Fisk seems to be getting the very real - very logiocal and common-sense - feeling that the US government is not telling the truth about what went down on that day (on those days). So why would he then refuse to follow that train of thought to its logical conclusion - that the US government, most likely in concert with a handful of foreign regimes (Israel, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia to name but a few of the most likely suspects) was in some way directly responsible for 9/11? What kind of journalist - investigator - negates the big picture questions of motive and opportunity, just scratches his head and says, “That doesn’t make sense”, and leaves it at that?
So I will just scratch my head and leave it at that. But then again, I’m not an “independent” investigative journalist.

Report this

By nemo, August 31, 2007 at 5:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ya, I think Robert Fisk is doing himself a big disservice with his ridiculous comments, pandering to the neocons and ignoring the scientific evidence of the scholars for 911 like prof Jones
and Fetzer, Griffin and now Margulis. He should read up on the subject before spouting off like an idiot.

To you Fisk, try google, 911, jones, thermate. Just for starters.

Report this

By Randy, August 31, 2007 at 1:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Anyone who equates the word “zionism” with a form
of racisim, is just one of those who cannot think.
They don’t know history,but think they do.
  I don’t care what they call me. Abe foxman
is not my friend. They torture and murder palestinians
every day. Men, women, children.
The jew has by his/her beliefs,declared me an enemy,
and when I oppose thier actions which show this,
they scream “antsemite”. Opposing my enemies actions?
 
50 million dead christians in the ussr?
Tortue? Genocide? Look who’s doing/done it, and the truthfull answer makes YOU an “antisemite”.
SO BE IT> Self survival, or P correctness?
Idiots.

Report this

By Scott, August 30, 2007 at 11:54 pm Link to this comment

I hate to sound like a broken record folks but if we really expect honest timely information from our governments we need to wire our politicians to the Internet and monitor them 24/7.

The technology to do this has been on the shelf for awhile now. The only thing we need to do is spread the idea, the notion, the possibility that the government is OUR’S to do with as we please.

We need politicians that are willing to wire themselves for total public awareness of everything they say and do in our name.

If enough of us demand it there will be a supply.

Report this

By Trevor, August 30, 2007 at 11:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I appreciate that the author notes the presence of a lunatic fringe which needs to be avoided (his “ravers”) and I would agree that official reports have perhaps left some questions.  But a number of organizations have reported on this, not just the gov official 9/11 commission, and many of the “lingering questions” he cites (missing parts, burn temperatures and steel failures) have very simple and logical answers. Moreover, many of the “questions” are simply common misunderstandings of the facts. 

I’d reccomend the 9/11 myths and “Screw Loose Change” sites, not just for thier answers but for their links to authoritative sources.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, August 30, 2007 at 10:56 pm Link to this comment

One thing is certain. The complete truth about 911 will never be known, nor will the many inconsistences ever be addressed.

Confusion and deceit will be used to obscure the picture, and disinformation to lead us astray.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 10:23 pm Link to this comment

And ask yourself this question: Who had the motive and the means to ‘pull off’ 9/11?

Was it 19 crazed Arabs who hated our freedom, are still alive and couldn’t fly a small Cessna, never mind execute extremely difficult (hypothetically) commercial airliner maneuvers? No way, Jose!

Was it the Mossad, a highly skilled, ruthless and deceptive organization with katsas and sayanim all over America, anxious to find an excuse for America to attack foes in the ME (Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon) that Israel has been dying to neutralize for a long time? And they have access to mini-nukes and all the thermate needed via their American Zionist stooges, planted in the Pentagon, MIC, NORAD, Congress and, hold onto your yarmulkes….....the WH!? You betcha they had the means and a motive! They still do! Oy, veh, America!

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 9:58 pm Link to this comment

Well, well - look what blew in with the wind, huffing and puffing foul air?! What else but the Windbag!

Well, Windbag, you’re part right. But it wasn’t just Jews who did it - although many would claim to be Jews or people would think of them as Jews. It was Zionists who did it. Israel-lovers who want America to squander its blood and treasure on Israel’s “Greater Israel” gory fantasy.

“NEVER AGAIN!” Let the Israelis waste their own blood and treasure!

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 9:39 pm Link to this comment

Frank, while you’re sleeping, dream about this: You haven’t answered the question “Why didn’t the FBI release the many videos which would prove that a plane hit the Pentagon?” You know why, Frank? Because it is self-evident that no commercial airliner hit the Pentagon! And Frank, that’s only 1 small piece of The Puzzle! There is the WTC#7 controlled demolition and a whole bunch of other pieces which clearly point the finger of guilt at Zionists, Mossad, Israel, the Pentagon and MIC, Dick Cheney, Larry Silverstein and, last but certainly not least…....our very own wannabe dictator Dubya! wink

You’re in for a VERY rude awakening, Frank! (sooner rather than later) - from a VERY bad nightmare smile

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 9:29 pm Link to this comment

Cichawoda:

Zionist crap? That Zionist crap happens to be THE explanation for most of the evil occurring today - especially in the ME and in America! Focused? - I am more focused on Truth than you can possibly imagine! smile

Here are some websites that are equally focused:

ZioPedia
What Really Happened
LastTrumpetMinistries
TexeMarrs
SmokingMirrors (Blog)
TheTruthSeeker
etc.

(just too many to list here - but it’s a good start!)

In your spare time, read Douglas Reed’s book “The Controversy of Zion” - it’s a real eye-opener on Zionism by someone who wrote from experience.

Report this

By Guy Baker, August 30, 2007 at 9:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Daniel Hopsicker has done a decent job of digging up info on Mohamed Atta.  Very colorful man, indeed.
http://www.madcowprod.com

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, August 30, 2007 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It takes an article like this to bring all the anti-semitic tin-foil hats out from under their rocks.  They don’t care about facts and physics—they just want everyone to say “THE DIRTY JEWS DID IT!”

As the fascists like to say, if you say it often enough, it becomes “the Truth”—even when it’s not.

(Just read DogShit’s last 100 or so posts)

Report this

By Philip, August 30, 2007 at 8:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

groan….not again.
Let me just say I am a Democrat and Bush hater. But please…for a journalist to publish this is just mind boggling.
Try this link too. http://www.theskepticsguide.org/skepticsguide/podcast-091405.html

Report this
Cichawoda's avatar

By Cichawoda, August 30, 2007 at 8:57 pm Link to this comment

Frank -

“No effort was made to preserve the evidence of the unprecedented and unexplained collapses of skyscrapers WTC 1, WTC 2, and Building 7 in lower Manhattan—easily the three largest and least understood structural failures in World history. Indeed the evidence was destroyed with remarkable speed and efficiency.”
http://911research.com/wtc/evidence/steel.html

Where’s the plane?
http://911research.com/pentagon/evidence/photos/bluehi.html

And Godsend - what is with all that Zionist crap? Focus - don’t let your fears get the better of you.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 8:10 pm Link to this comment

It’s 11:00 pm here , and I’m done with this thread for the day.  Godsend, make sure you put on your tin foil hat before you go to bed, to keep out the Zionist mind control radio waves.

Night night

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 8:08 pm Link to this comment

“The photos of the Pentagon after impact clearly show NO tons of anything! “

Then you either haven’t seen the hundreds of photos, both inside and out, or you need to have your eyes (or head) examined.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 8:04 pm Link to this comment

By the way, this is a silly question:

“Why did the FBI confiscate all videos surrounding the Pentagon, MINUTES after the cruise missile and drone hit? “

Just so I understand, you are asking why did the FBI,  the main anti-terrorism organization in the US, collect critical evidence of a (terrorist) crime scene as soon as possible,  during a period of ongoing threat from further attacks?

Seriously, are you actually asking that?  Wow…

Gee, maybe to examine the footage as soon as possible for critical intelligence that was needed ASAP during an ongoing national crises? Maybe because they need to see for themselves exactly what hit the building so the ongoing threat could be identified ?

You find that suspicious? What country are you from?  In your country, would the cops have shown up 4 hours later on camels and stood around smoking?  Is that what you think would be the norm? 

You sound less rational with every post.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 8:02 pm Link to this comment

Frank:

When you say “removed from the site”, do you mean like the WTC wreckage and criminal evidence was “removed from the site” under the direction of the Federal Gov’t and that Zionist ‘Mayor of America’, Rudy Giuliani, the Zionist pervert and close friend of ‘Lucky’ Larry Silverstein? How lucky can anyone get?! wink

PS The photos of the Pentagon after impact clearly show NO tons of anything! Why were they in such a hurry to remove what litle there was to remove, covered up (in more ways than one!). You, however, and the rest of the Zionists, are full of tons of you-know-what!

Report this

By Jay, August 30, 2007 at 7:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Total inside job.  But only intellectuals get it…thus the low percentage of “truthers”.

Report this

By Aditya, August 30, 2007 at 7:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yeah, you need to look out for those “ravers” like Robert Baer, CIA case officer, Ray McGovern CIA analyst who delivered presidential daily briefings to Ronald Reagan,FBI directer Louis Freeh, several senators and representatives, governors, etc. why do they hate America?

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Report this

By 911truthdotorg, August 30, 2007 at 7:56 pm Link to this comment

My God, how can ANYONE still believe the “official” story of 9/11?  The only reason I can think of is that the sheep simply don’t WANT to believe that they have mass murderers running their country.

bush’s next false flag attack is coming…but it will be so big that he’ll declare martial law, at which time, this country will cease to exist.

If you believe your own eyes, please watch these Google videos: 9/11 Press for Truth, Loose Change 2nd Edition, Terror Storm, Zeitgeist

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 7:53 pm Link to this comment

If you’re an American patriot, check out:

http://patriotsquestion911.com

for Truth about 9/11!

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment

Godsend, just curious, was it the “cruise missile” or the “drone” that was carrying the tons of aircraft debris later removed from the site, plus the charred bodies of passengers?

Was it the cruise missile or the drone that severed the light poles across the street on approach, yet had the huge mass and momentum to continue to the building without veering into the ground?

Was it the cruise missile or the drone who’s long wing struck the generator trailer and damaged it significantly before hitting the building?

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/i

Report this

By Enemy of State, August 30, 2007 at 7:33 pm Link to this comment

The somewhat shabby investigation from the 9-11 commission, and lack of detailed public explanations for the collaspse mode of the three towers (actually the recently released stuff on WTC7 is convincing to me),had lead to all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories. I think the conservatives may be deliberately allowing the poor job (of explaination) to go on, because the conspracy wacko-s make the liberals look foolish.

  So what is IMHO reasonably well explained, and what needs work:

(1) The run-up to the attack. How seriously did the administraion take the warnings? I think this was glossed over because it would have been highly embarassing for the administration. This is likely the reason for the sloopy job the 9-11 commision did on other parts of the report.

(2) The collapse of the towers:

  The explanation of the initiation of the collapse, is adequate, and convincing to structural engineers. (I am not a structural engineer, but I work for them).

  The speed of collapse: The film seems to show free-fall velocity. This should be expected, because the material that fell outside of the buildings (i.e. not interacting with the remaining part of the towers) would have fallen at the freefall velocity. The collapse of the core of the towers was obscured by the dust/smoke left by this material. The seismic evidence shows that the cores collapse was slower.

  The “miracle” that the towers essentially collapsed into their own footprints. I’ve never heard an explanation. It is probably a result of the tubular construction of the towers. But shouldn’t we be shown the results of a simulation of this. A lot of conspiracy theories could be refuted by this exercise. Why hasn’t it been done?

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 7:32 pm Link to this comment

Frank:

Calling me a moron identifies you as either (1) a Zionist Neocon or (2) a moron. Take your choice. You can opt for BOTH! smile

Why did the FBI confiscate all videos surrounding the Pentagon, MINUTES after the cruise missile and drone hit? Where are the wings, tail, fuselage, seats, engines (of the correct type) in the one video (a few frames) taken seconds before impact? Why is the lawn so beautiful and undisturbed?

Do you really think most Americans are idiots and can’t SEE the Truth for themselves by now? The Web is choking on 9/11 information which makes a mockery out of the ‘Official’ explanation!

Go back to you Zionists masters and tell them: “It’s time to renew your Israeli passport!”

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 7:20 pm Link to this comment

If you have a scientific mind, try:

http://physics911.net

for 9/11 Truth.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 7:11 pm Link to this comment

Godsend, yes, since I stated facts that discredit your version of things, I must be a zionist conspirator. That kind of thinking has just instantly identified you as a moron.

While I may still engage in discussions on this subject with rational people who have some knowledge of the subject, I no longer have patience for people who simply parrot other peoples unfounded claims and refuse to acknowledge facts to the contrary.

FYI, there were literally tons of aircraft debris removed from the Pentagon, which is 20 minutes from where I live, weighing thousands of times more than any missile and containing matching turbine engine parts, landing gear struts, wheels, tires, chunks of fuselage, and other parts.  Though there were not photos published of corpses, multiple first-responder eyewitness at the scene, including Capt. Jim Ingledue of the Virginia Beach Fire Dept,  reported seeing charred passenger bodies still strapped in seats.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment

If you don’t know where to start to get 9/11 Truth, start here:

http://www.911truth.org

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 6:27 pm Link to this comment

mackTN:

You are verging into Zionist shill territory when claiming that a Democratic president will reveal all about 9/11! The Zionists ‘did’ 9/11 and the next president (Democrat or Republican) is likely to be the Zionist candidate-of-choice (Giuliani), unless Bush emerges from the pre-election muck as Dictator-in-Chief.

Democrats and Republican leaders belong to the same Zionist American Party (ZAP - for ZAP America!).

Report this

By Michael Gass, August 30, 2007 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

9/11… ah yes…

First, there are many of us who aren’t buying the “official” story; that doesn’t mean we also believe aliens crashed at Roswell or JFK was assassinated by Martians.

I am a veteran of the first gulf war.  I am a bomb technician by specialty (military trained Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist).  I spent 6 years after the military in law enforcement.  I have been part of 4 Presidential VIP Protection missions working with the USSS Technical Services Division. 

There are just too many people, from too many professions, who have found “holes” in the official story. 
Was it total incompetence (Condi Rice stating, “who could have guessed”, only to recant that statement later in front of Congress)?  If that were the case, why did John Ashcroft stop flying commercial aircraft months prior to 9/11? 

Was it lack of leadership?  If that were the case, why did the United States Secret Service agents in the White House get Cheney to the secure basement, but, the USSS agents on the travel team with Bush DIDN’T hustle him out of the school? 

How did an airplane crash into the WTC tower in a fireball, the tower collapse, but on top of the rubble a passport of one of the hijackers was found pretty as you please?  Come on now… really.

To be clear here, these questions are not automatically claiming anything… they are legitimate questions concerning the worst terror attack on America that the “official” story just doesn’t cover.

The only question I pose that can be taken as “automatically claiming anything” is the collapse of the towers.  Towers 1 and 2 collapsed from the aircraft strikes.  Ok, implausible but I’ll buy it.  Tower 7?  No way that tower drops into its footprint because there were fires in the building (started by what again?) and some minor damage.  It isn’t happening.  Other buildings around the collapse suffered the same minor damage from the collapse of 1 and 2 and are still standing.  The ONLY explanation (that deals in reality) for WTC 7’s collapse was that it was brought down purposefully, ie, it was a controlled demolition.  As one poster already commented, it is on tape where the tower owner stated they “pulled” the building… and as that comment asks, rightfully, when DID the explosives get placed?

I can buy WTC 1 and 2 dropping from the aircraft strikes.  I can even buy that hijackers took over airplanes with box-cutters (its a stretch, but ok).  But buy that the USSS agents in Florida broke all protection protocol knowing that America was under attack, using hijacked aircraft as weapons?  No, I don’t buy that.  Buy that our government was unprepared for the attack when the Attorney General stopped flying commercial months before the attack?  No, I don’t buy that either.  Buy that a passport survives the disintegration of the aircraft, the fireball, AND the building collapse, and then, is sitting out on TOP of the rubble pretty as you please?  Nope, I do buy that either… it was planted.

The fact is, as long as the questions remain unanswered and the administration has zero interest in getting them answered, one cannot help but conclude there was a conspiracy.

Report this
mackTN's avatar

By mackTN, August 30, 2007 at 6:14 pm Link to this comment

I agree with author Fisk that the 9/11 story gets increasingly muddled over time, especially because it’s been hijacked by the Bush administration who’ve been desperate to justify our occupation of Iraq with it. 

I, too, have pondered the lack of information on the Pentagon attack.  But I attributed it to the fact that the Pentagon is after all a sensitive military institution.  discussing details of its mishap would only expose it even more, wouldn’t it? 

What I didn’t know about 9/11 aftermath was that so many people jumped to their deaths.  This info was never reported during real time and video was never shown in the U.S. either until much later in documentaries and films.  Other parts of the world saw these things. 

The Iraq and 9/11 stories will perhaps emerge once Bush is out of office and a Democratic president takes his place.  They know it, and that’s why key Bush people have quit—so that they can ensure a Republican presidential win in 2008.

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 6:11 pm Link to this comment

weather, Frank is not worthy of any kind of response. He is from the Zionist (Mossad) School of Deception, sometimes known as the Orwellian “Black is White” School. They think that large airplanes have no wings - or tails, for that matter! wink No seats, either, and especially no engines that match the airplane model that supposedly flew into the Pentagon - through several walls, just like a missile! wink

Report this
GodSend's avatar

By GodSend, August 30, 2007 at 6:01 pm Link to this comment

The Zionists and/or Zionist shills have arrived and identified themselves:

Frank, nf and M. Kimble. (notice that they are outnumbered by the sane people who KNOW the government is LYING!) smile

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 5:58 pm Link to this comment

Weather, I will gladly admit you are right if you can show a single inaccuracy in anything I wrote. Go for it.

Report this

By Dr. Paul Proteus, August 30, 2007 at 5:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I can do without a lot of the “wackier” theories and simply ask: “How can this happen?” Roughly half the taxes we pay go toward, we are told, “keeping us safe” in the form of the defense budget. We weren’t kept safe on 9/11. I want a refund.

How can the Pentagon, which should be one of the most defended buildings on the planet, get hit by ANYTHING almost an hour after the first attack and well after the second in New York? That’s the fishiest thing of all to me.

Report this

By weather, August 30, 2007 at 5:50 pm Link to this comment

Frank - prick yourself, your in full flight from reality.

Mr. Frisk thank you for writing this and thank you Truthdig for posting it.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment

-The attack maneuver required extreme piloting skill.

This is a fallacy that keeps getting repeated and people just accept it at face value. It is far easier to fly a plane into a huge building than to execute a controlled precision approach landing, which the 9/11 pilots had done many times.  Any low-time pilot can do the Pentagon maneuver at 100% flight realism in Flight Simulator with just a little practice.  I have done it several times and I am no world class fighter pilot, just a low-time private pilot.

-The alleged suicide pilots lacked the requisite piloting skills.

Another fallacy. The hijacker pilot of flight 77, Hani Hanjour,  had an FAA issued Commercial Pilots Certificate. This is not an entry level license like a Private Pilot (which I am). Commercial Pilot certificate candidates must already be Private Pilot certificate holders and must have flown a minimum of 250 hours flight time, plus minimum amounts of IFR (instrument flight) and complex multi-engine flight time. Then they must pass a written exam and take a flight test, where they must demonstrate proficiency at high performance maneuvers in complex aircraft, done to the satisfaction of an FAA flight examiner.  If they screw up in any way, they will not get passed by the examiner.

Report this

By David B. Benson, August 30, 2007 at 5:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Oh dear, oh dear. Still believing the stuff the wackos put out, I see.

(1) The ‘airplane part’ which landed ‘miles away’ in Pennsyvania was a bank cheque.

(2) WTC 7 took about 15—18 seconds to collapse, from the seismograph record.

(3) WTC 1 took about 18 seconds to collapse, WTC 2 took about 15 seconds.

There are two inactive threads and one still active thread on the PhysOrgForum board on which several quite knowledgable people post regarding the physics, chemistry and engineering involved in the events at the World Trade Center.  Note, nothing about the politics, etc.  Just science based information.

If you would like to understand these events, try there…

Report this

By slang, August 30, 2007 at 5:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m glad a “respected” journalist has put some of the more important questions forward. Your dispatches from Afghanistan were among the most compelling and informative.

The real problem here is the lunatic fringe has been given the task of answering these valid questions. As far as I can tell they are part of the conspiracy, whatever form it took. Kept everyone else from asking legitimate questions or coming forward with information.

Perhaps there’s a deeper reason why there has been no public demand for the whole truth. We don’t want to know. It would mean the powers that be have no credibility, are in fact criminals and that means anarchy. When I imagine the government being responsible for something as horrific as this I am more afraid than I am believing it was some angry terrorists. I understand Terrorism. It’s Treason i don’t get.

Report this
Cichawoda's avatar

By Cichawoda, August 30, 2007 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment

Why the secrecy?
“Not only has the government refused to release footage that would clearly show how the Pentagon was attacked, it has also seized footage not belonging to the military. The FBI confiscated video recordings from several private businesses near the Pentagon in the immediate aftermath of the attack. Those recordings, if they still exist, might provide decisive evidence about the attack.”

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/footage.html

What I don’t understand is why everybody who considers themselves an American is not fighting to find out the truth.

Report this

By Dale Headley, August 30, 2007 at 4:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t for a minute believe that the Bush Administration plotted to blow up those towers; however, I could be persuaded that they knew something big was about to happen and chose to let it play out in order to give themelves the rationale they were seeking to invade the oil fields of Iraq.

Report this
Cichawoda's avatar

By Cichawoda, August 30, 2007 at 4:32 pm Link to this comment

Never mind the no-plane pentagon theory but why can’t we answer these anomalies:

-The Pentagon was left undefended until after being hit at 9:38.

-The Pentagon should be the best-defended building in the world.

-The Pentagon was hit more than 80 minutes into the attack.

-It is 10 miles from Andrews Air Force Base.

-Cheney watched the attack plane approach from 50 miles out.

-The attack maneuver required extreme piloting skill.

-The alleged suicide pilots lacked the requisite piloting skills.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/topanomalies.html

Report this
Cichawoda's avatar

By Cichawoda, August 30, 2007 at 4:20 pm Link to this comment

Some of the theories are wacky but why is the press not asking the questions. Why aren’t all the videos shown, why isn’t the biggest breach of US security discussed or independently investigated? If there was nothing to hide couldn’t all the questions be answered to everybodys satisfaction. Here is an example:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/squibs.html

Report this

By Loonesta, August 30, 2007 at 3:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If people in the current administration were not so secretive and so obviously obfuscatory, if there were not so many other documented-on-video indicents of deceit, lying or “memory failure”, if there had not been other indications that life means nothing to this gang of crooks, I’d find the disputes regarding “9-11” (TM) incredible.  But I don’t.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment

I have questions too. WHY do people keep asking “where are the aircraft parts from the pentagon” when there are hundreds of photos of aircraft parts there, all of them identifiable as the right kind of aircraft? What kind of lazy journalist HASN’T spent five minutes of research to find these easily found photos, before posing a question about it?  I’m not even going to get into the idiocy about the snapping beams, which has been explained to death to the satisfaction of the vast majority of America’s structural engineers.

Need help, donkeys?  Click here and scroll down. THEN try asking where the airplane parts are.

http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

The truth is, people like Robert Fisk know these photos are out there, but pretend they don’t exist so they can pose questions with the intent of misleading people into thinking these questions have not already been adequately answered a thousand times. Fisk’s objective is not that of a journalist with integrity, but rather that of a journalist with an agenda, and he is not above deception to advance his agenda.

Report this

By DASM, August 30, 2007 at 3:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“We’re an empire now - we create our own reality” - Karl Rove.  Very creepy.  Anyone remember the Fall of the Roman Empire?  The USA is headed that way, thanks to Rove, Cheney, Bush, et al.  Empires crash, remember that.

Report this

By Frank, August 30, 2007 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment

I have questions too. WHY do people keep asking “where are the aircraft parts from the pentagon” when there are hundreds of photos of aircraft parts there, all of them identifiable as the right kind of aircraft? What kind of lazy journalist HASN’T spent five minutes of research to find these easily found photos, before posing a question about it?  I’m not only going to get into the idiocy about the snapping beams, which has been explained to death to the satisfaction of the vast majority of America’s structural engineers.

Need help, donkeys?  Click here and scroll down. THEN try asking where the airplane parts are.

http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

The truth is, people like Robert Fisk know these photos are out there, but pretend they don’t exist so they can pose questions with the intent of misleading people into thinking these questions have not already been adequately answered a thousand times. Fisk’s objective is not that of a journalist with integrity, but rather that of a journalist with an agenda, and he is not above deception to advance his agenda.

Report this

By Kathy, August 30, 2007 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You have your head in the sand along with everyone else.  If you can’t see that we’ve been had by the “official” 9/11 story, I give up.

Report this

By dsmith, August 30, 2007 at 2:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I can’t buy into the “inside job” theory for the twin towers, but I do find another aspect of this story very interesting. The story is about a group of Israeli art students arrested after the twin towers were hit.

According to police reports these Israeli students were reported by an alertcitizen who spotted young men standing on top of their vans applauding the destruction of the towers. This event and their eventual arrest was even reported by Carl Cameron of FOX NEWS but was shortly thereafter deleted from their website.

It seems these students, who sold art in places like the pentagon as a cover, were actually Israeli spies following the Saudis who took over the airplanes. They, the so-called art students, are thought to have known the attack was going to occur and wanted a grand view of the disaster. The thought of these Israeli men cheering as Americans jumped out of windows to their death is quite disturbing.

Read more about it at Antiwar.com. It’s in the left hand column labled Israeli Art Students. Now there is a story that needs to be investigated. If true it could shift American/Israeli relations and at least piss a lot of people off.

By the way, after several days of being questioned, the students were released and immediately fled the country, back to Israel.

Report this

By Akshay, August 30, 2007 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The NIST’s FAQ about the WTC collapse is at:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
They deal with “conspiracy-like” questions about the collapse.

Atta’s letter is definitely weird, but then so was Atta. Juan Cole’s analysis is here: http://www.juancole.com/essays/qaeda.htm

I think we can stick to the null hypothesis here. The “right-wing conspiracy” against Iraq and civil liberties got going *after* 9/11, in plain sight.

Report this

By mary, August 30, 2007 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment

I don’t believe anything that comes out of DC, no matter who says it.  I’m still hoping to see some journalist and people on the inside feel obligated to bring the truth to the public for the sake of our Constitution and Democracy.  There are a whole lot of dirty hands here…....

Report this

By Peter RV, August 30, 2007 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fisk asks
  “how on earth could it (i.e.the incompetent Bush Gang) bring off the international crimes against humanity in the U.S. on 11 September 2001”.
He then goes on to say that he continues to reject that hypothesis. Actually, I think I agree with him on that. However, he stops short too quickly from speculating who else might have done it. Someone far more competent than the clotsy CIA-FBI twins, someone much more secretive and with a ‘New Pearl Harbor’ on its agenda.
  Here is another “raver” for you, Mr. Fisk :
Why don’t you discuss the possibility Mossad did it?

Report this
Cichawoda's avatar

By Cichawoda, August 30, 2007 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment

The snowball that started with the Complete 911 Timeline by http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/ has finally gotten big enough to get “mainstream” press notice - what took you guys so long?

By 9/12 I saw that there was something fishy - from 8:21am (the latest when all agencies knew about the first hijacking) till 10:06am (when flight 93 crashes) - 1.5 hrs - there is virtually no response from the people that are responsible for the security of our air space. You have to conclude that it was either gross incompetence (so why wasn’t anybody held accountable) or it was an inside job.

In the end all we want is some answers that make sense.

Report this

By lurxst, August 30, 2007 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

United 93 was shot down. Burning debris was found 2 1/2 miles before the crash site. The 911 commission noted that the request to scramble interceptors happened 30 minutes before the crash at 10:05am. They then say that VP Cheney gave the order to shoot 93 down around 10:15am. So indeed, Cheney did give the order, although the fuzzing of the time frames persists in order to not have to deal with the awful fallout of having to shoot down one of our own airliners. Although the evidence is pretty explicit, the tale has been so purposely twisted and confused that people resort to saying “no one can ever really know”.  But when you look at it with plain eyes, its obvious.

So, right there is some truth, cloaked in a lie.

Report this

By nf, August 30, 2007 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment

To devote even one sentence anywhere to these conspiracy theories is an insult to any thinking individual.  The attention should be focused on the child abusing parents throughout the world that indoctrinate their children with the nonsense of any religion. THEY and THEY alone are responsible for the 911 atrocity and most of the atrocities that have occurred throughout history.  Until the dogmas of all religions are exposed for their lies the rest of us will be subject to the life threatening pursuits of their followers.

Report this

By M. Kimble, August 30, 2007 at 1:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Part of the problem with reporting, IMO, is that reporters and those that read their stories, don’t bother to do the hard work of actually fact checking their information. Ask a Pysicist what happens to steel when it heats up. It loses half its strength at only 650 degrees. At that temperature, the supporting members of the towers are sufficiently weakened to cause structural collapse. Almost every single arguement proposed by “conspiricists” have been answered, in some way or the other, by those knowledgeable in the fields of demolition, physics, engineering and others to preclude this idea of some vast, complicated conspiracy by a president, who at the time of being notified of the attack, was sitting in a classroom reading “My Pet Goat” with no clue on what to do or how to react.

An excellenct summary of the 9/11 Conspiracy questions can be found in the Vol. 12 No. 4 issue of Skeptic magazine.

Report this

By iamsancho, August 30, 2007 at 1:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

when you recall Bush’s curious remarks about conspiracy theories and his stubborn opposition to having a congressional inquiry at all; or the way the commission was set up- they didnt actually get to interview the witnesses but instead relied on accounts provided by the administration, the whole process begins to look like a cover up. Incompetence, malfeasance or something much worse is involved. Only three steel framed buildings in history collapsed from a fire, all three on the same day. How about the owner admitting on the air that they decided to “pull down” bldg seven due to fire damage. When did they plant the explosives?

Report this

Page 11 of 11 pages « First  <  9 10 11

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.