![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Free Market MadnessPosted on Aug 30, 2007By Marie Cocco WASHINGTON—With Labor Day approaching, it must not go unnoticed that Angelo Mozilo, chief executive of Countrywide Financial—the company that has helped drive world markets into turmoil with its lending—raked in $42.9 million last year. The Nobel laureate Harold Varmus, chief executive of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, was paid $2.5 million. Roughly speaking, here is what their relative compensation means: We now value the contributions of someone who has left homeowners frantic about whether they will be able to keep a roof over their heads about 18 times as much as we do those of a brilliant scientist whose groundbreaking research on the genetic basis for cancer could save millions of lives. Yet what new mother, dreamily rocking her infant, wishes that her child one day will grow up to invent a convoluted mortgage instrument? We’ve known for years that executive pay is obscenely out of whack with the earnings of today’s workers. The current ratio, according to public data analyzed by the Institute for Policy Studies, is that CEO pay among the chieftains of Fortune 500 companies is about 364 times the pay of an average worker. The data, drawn from an Associated Press survey of executive pay, do not reflect the latest Census Bureau finding that earnings of men and women who work full time dropped by about 1 percent last year. It’s the third consecutive year that earnings have dropped, the government says. Here is another way to measure the madness: If you count only the value of “perks”—private jets used for personal travel, reimbursement of country club fees and commuting expenses, even company payment of taxes owed on bonus income—a minimum-wage earner would have to work for 36 years to earn the equivalent of what corporate chiefs averaged just in perks last year, according to the IPS, a liberal-leaning economic research group. Whatever populist urge arises from these juxtapositions is lost, oddly, in what sometimes seems to be boredom with the truth. The level of inequality in our society is at a high point in contemporary American history, a new “Gilded Age” is upon us and, according to conventional thought, there just isn’t much to be done about it. The legislative fixes that from time to time arise—limiting egregious tax loopholes for hedge-fund managers, capping the amount that can be put away in increasingly robust, tax-deferred retirement accounts for top executives—are nip-and-tuck tactics. They won’t change the overall contour of a business culture run amok. It is not only that American business executives are doing far, far better now than before when compared with their own workers. They’re doing far, far better than business leaders in Europe—the very executives against whom American CEOs say they must compete in the global economic market. In 2006, according to the IPS, the 20 highest-paid European managers made a combined average of $12.5 million. That’s about a third as much as the top 20 American managers. And American business leaders are doing far, far better than American leaders in other professions. Scientists and doctors, university presidents and others who run large enterprises don’t come close to their compensation. Nor do U.S. military leaders now running two complex wars—they earn a tiny fraction of what the heads of major U.S. defense contractors take in. “How do we deal with the bigger drift here?” asks Chuck Collins, senior scholar for the IPS. “We tilted the rules so that asset owners became winners over wage earners. We lifted up capital and betrayed work.” There’s been a cultural shift of historic proportion. In the decades that followed the Great Depression and World War II, public policy was shaped to support creation of a mass middle class. Now, contemporary politics concentrates power in the hands of campaign donors. The public is fascinated with individual riches—even if they’re displayed in the debauchery of a Paris Hilton. Yet it seems we have reached this unacceptable extreme less by design than by dereliction of some communal duty. Politics has played a role, beginning with the Reagan-era delusion of trickle-down economics. But so, too, has a failure of heart. Even after the spectacular collapse of Enron, no fundamental change came about to prevent future corporate manipulations. Now we are in the midst of a mortgage meltdown. Rebalancing portfolios is the recommended short-term palliative. Rebalancing our culture is the only long-term hope. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com. © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: Abu Ghraib: One of Al's Claims to Fame Next item: Questioning 9/11 ... With Caution Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By FFURKS, September 10, 2007 at 4:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“...in a store one day I was looking at some dishes and looked at the bottom to see where it came from (hand-painted dish-ware is suspect in my book) and found a price-tag covering it’s maker’s name. Finally finding one that I was able to peel off, CHINA.”
Why do you tyhink they call plates, dishes, and such “china”
Report thisBy Zena, September 9, 2007 at 11:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Seems the only weapon the middle-class and poor have to fight with is what little money they have. And it IS a job trying to find out where and who our products come from so we can boycott the countries and people trying to kill us. For instance, in a store one day I was looking at some dishes and looked at the bottom to see where it came from (hand-painted dish-ware is suspect in my book) and found a price-tag covering it’s maker’s name. Finally finding one that I was able to peel off, CHINA. Why poison yourself? Didn’t they pass a law that they were supposed to at least start labeling our food? Well, they haven’t, hardly at all.
Report thisBy Dan Uu Noel, September 8, 2007 at 8:32 pm #
CEO pay may not remain a problem for much longer. As China gets its industry on par with ours, it will soon grow a crop of CEO’s as sharp as ours. Some day, one company will get a Chinese CEO on an H1 visa for a pay that will be very low by U.S. standards, yet very high by Chinese standards. And the trend can only snowball from there on…
Love,
Report thisBy cognitorex, September 5, 2007 at 7:33 am #
Major change in accounting proposed for CEO (embezzlement) salaries. Mo more accounting as corporate expense proposed!
Report this.
America’s Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chiefs are close to deciding that salary and perks exceeding five million dollars annually can not rationally be deemed pay for work expended. Payouts of five million to hundreds of millions would quite boggle the minds of both Adam Smith and Karl Marx, said one insider, “off, off, off the record.”
Going forward, the recommendation will be that executive remuneration exceeding five mil annually will be construed as a disbursement of corporate capital. Henceforth these deductions from a company’s capital account must be subject to a public vote and agreed to per amounts by boards, directors, trustees and not so trust-ees as the case may be.
The new accounting Pronouncement will reflect that mega salaries in excess of the maximum five mil will be considered as an allocation of corporate capital which will no longer qualify for accounting treatment as a corporate expense.
A number of CEO’s have formed a study committee particularly in response to the IRS position of “You can call it capital or you can call it Swiss cheese, we’re still taxing exec’ pay at the highest personal rate possible.”
“There’s a fundamental lack of fairness here,” whinged the corporate CEO’s.
They, the potentially afflicted CEOs, vociferously pointed out that, “This change is counterintuitive. Even embezzlement is treated as a deductible expense.”
Shareholders, mostly wearing Abu Ghraib style hooding to protect their identities, were cautiously pessimistic.
--cognitorex blogspot--
By farmertx, September 5, 2007 at 6:42 am #
I have no problem with a Bill Gates type who invents something that people really want and are willing to buy raking in billions.
Report thisI do have a problem with a CEO who is basically a caretaker, adding nothing to the net worth of the company (other than by manipulating the books) making that kind of money.
Finally, JCPenny shareholder’s said enough is too much and won the right to approve exec pay, bonuses and severance packages.
When are the other shareholder’s going to wake up? Can’t they see that their dividends would be greater were it not for these pay packages? Or are they all lock step Republican’s and blind to reality?
And the severance packages really took the cake.
A person who failed to do the job is fired and then rakes in millions? That goes beyond obscene.
By Jkoch, September 2, 2007 at 9:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The wealthy have nothing to fear. Everyone hates income taxes or estate taxes. Anyone who does their own 1040 acquires an indelible dislike of government. If voters reward politicians who attack these peeves, and if shareholders blithely confuse the pay of the executive with the performance of “their” company, then the top of the pyramid can expect to reap more and more.
Report thisBy DennisD, August 31, 2007 at 5:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Marie - I’m sure you mean freely manipulated market. There isn’t one aspect of life in America that isn’t controlled by the rich. They set the prices for what we buy and move the markets up or down as needed and if something goes wrong their paid for government employees are there to use taxpayer money to fix it.
Report thisCrapitalism at it’s best.
By FFURKS, August 31, 2007 at 10:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Even after the spectacular collapse of Enron, no fundamental change came about to prevent future corporate manipulations. Now we are in the midst of a mortgage meltdown.
Remember Drexel Burnham Lambert?
Mike Milliken
Kolbert, Kravis & Roberts
Remember
RJR Nabisco,
The Movie “Wall Street”
The book Barbarians at the Gates?
Remember the “Crash” of ‘87, the refinancing of Chrysler’s debt, the “New Rules” for home appraisers?
Remember when Japan and Saudi Arabia were financing our decadent lifestyle?
Probably not, that is why this Country-wide thingy is such a shocker to a country with a 15-minute-memory.
First time, shame on them
Report thissecond time shame on us!
By hippy pam, August 31, 2007 at 3:49 am #
OTHER COUNTRIES DON’T HAVE TO INVADE THE U.S.-ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS SEND US CONTAMINATED ITEMS THAT POISON US IN OUR HOMES.LET’S LAY THIS ON BUSH*Ts DOORSTEP.HE SHOULD BE CONVICTED OF “CRIMINAL RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT” IF THERE IS SUCH A CHARGE.AFTER ALL......HE ENGINEERED THIS B*****T WITH THESE COUNTRIES.NOW OUR KIDS ARE SUFFERING WHILE HIS “BUSH BUNCH” CRONIES GET TAX BREAKS AND BONUS BUCKS.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, August 30, 2007 at 12:52 pm #
Here’s a balm for ya. When you get pissed about CEO’S, their companies, and the perks, not to mention the US gov. rocketing to bail them out of their financial miseries they themselves bring on in one way or another, think about the poor, and I do mean poor, bastards in NO who after two years have yet to hear from good ole’ Uncle Sam and that you could have been one of them. Doesn’t this country make you sick and elated at the same time? There’s no way the Boys of 1789 could have scripted stuff like this. If this is what living in a free society is, then I think I’d consider trying something different.
Report thisBy dick, August 30, 2007 at 11:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We have the super rich power elite and the masses. The richest 400 have a total wealth greater than the total of over 50 million households, with the gap widening with each year.
Report thisBy P. T., August 30, 2007 at 11:13 am #
The market is NOT a free one. CEOs have their friends placed on the corporate boards and the compensation committees. And the owners (the shareholders) are not allowed a vote on the compensation of the CEOs. The system is rigged.
Report thisBy spidey, August 30, 2007 at 11:03 am #
If you look at the “gay” nineties and the “roaring” twenties, it seems like Deja Vu. It took a “Great Depression” to reshape political and economic thought in this country and I’m afraid that’s what it’s going to take again. Even the foibles of Paris Hilton can be found in the past what with the Fatty Arbuckle and Stanford White cases. Unfortunately, the Plutocracy never goes broke in these crashes and in fact gets even richer by snapping up all the bargains that the nouveau riche have to dump for cash. The very same nouveau riche that are the most concerned with socialism/communism and who will be the big losers in any future economic upheaval. As long as the Soviet Bear was on the prowl, the plutocrats were sufficiently scared enough to keep their rapacity at bay. Come on China. Come on Putin. Maybe it’s dirty skivvies from fear that brings the “aristos” into a more reasonable point of view instead of phony Social Darwinism.
Report thisBy felicity, August 30, 2007 at 10:20 am #
#97673
You hit on the buzz words, communism/socialism. It’s amazing how those words continue to strike fear in the very hearts of so many Americans. A CEO’s vulgar rate of pay is merely proof that we haven’t been taken over by communists - what a relief.
Of course, on close inspection what we find in America is a dual economic system - capitalism for the poor and socialism for the rich.
Report thisBy Mudwollow, August 30, 2007 at 9:29 am #
http://www.tarpley.net/29crash.htm
For a fun read.
Report thisBy dp, August 30, 2007 at 8:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
As long as the Republican party continues to play the “fear” card and the masses swallow it, this will be the way of life in America. There are still many who fear Communism and Socialism. The middle class votes on the abortion issue and refuses to see what the ruling class is doing to their way of life. The ruling class has enjoyed socialized medicine for years, yet the dumbed-down masses fear that if this country were to enact a universal healthcare plan we would instantly become a Socialist state. Evidently many would rather not have access to healthcare than to receive it equally with their “betters.” Evidently, many would rather always live in the slave quarters, while revering their masters in the big house.
Report thisBy ocjim, August 30, 2007 at 8:26 am #
This so-called free-mkt madness has only reamed the average taxpayer, especially with the dawn of Reaganomics (Voodoo Economics) according to Bush sr.
Too few of us remember the thievery and the fraud of the S&L;crisis under Reagan and it is repeating itself with the subprime fiasco mentioned.
Like they say if you forget history, you’re doomed to repeat it. Propaganda has since convinced Americans that the rich earn what they get.
Look at some of the facts below:
The S&L;crisis of the 1980s was a wave of American savings and loan association failures involving over 1,000 savings and loan institutions. It was the largest and costliest venture in public fraud, insider abuse, and just plain larceny of all time.
The ultimate cost is estimated to be over $150 billion, about $125 billion paid for by the U. S. taxpayers (Wikipedia). It constituted a large portion of the budget deficits of the early 1990s, and probably contributed to the 1990-91 economic recession.
Report thisBy mary, August 30, 2007 at 7:41 am #
This trend won’t change until Americans demand action from our leaders and when we stop supporting wall street with our investment dollars. Now that would get their attention! How quick would the CEO at Mattel, and WallStreet, react if Americans don’t buy those chinese mfg toys this Christmas…
Report thisBy KISS, August 30, 2007 at 7:32 am #
And the disparity of the groveling congress that suck-up to these CEO’s becomes even more appalling.
Report thisBenito’s idea of government has come full-force in Amerika. We now are The Fascist Republic of Amerika. Where votes are measured in dollars with a payback of about 10% to politicians and 90% to the corporations that have taken America as hostage. Check out Ted Stevens for every dollar he flim flams he returns 20 or more dollar to his masters. And these crooked politicians even have support from their constituents. Nothing like being led to the slaughter house with a happy face.