![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Looking Back at LebanonPosted on Aug 21, 2007By Robert Fisk Editor’s Note: This column originally appeared in The Independent. I don’t think war is addictive – for some, perhaps, but not for me. I was asked about this by a journalist in Beirut the other day and I responded in my usual, tired way. War is about history. Anyone who finds conflict addictive is sick. Yes, I agree with Winston Churchill who once said that there is nothing so satisfying as to be shot at without effect. A good dinner after a bad day is much to be enjoyed. But I hate wars. I was thinking this over as I pawed through Double Blind, from which these photographs are taken. Its terrible, rage-filled, blood-spattered pages are an awful memory to me of last year’s war in Lebanon. It began on my birthday – my 60th birthday – when a dear friend called me up and told me what a terrible birthday I was going to have and I asked why and she told me that two Israeli soldiers had been captured by the Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and I asked Abed, my driver, to head south, because I knew that the Israelis would bomb across Lebanon. And I was right. But sitting on my balcony, looking at these dreadful, brilliant pictures today, I am reminded of a journey back from Europe not many months after that war. I had been launching the French and Dutch editions of my book on the Middle East and had spent many hours in the boulevards of Paris and along the canals of Amsterdam. I had watched young couples – happy, safe – secure in so far as anyone can be in George Bush’s crazed world – walking with their children and laughing, and asked myself if I could have lived a happier life. Selfish, of course, to reflect on such thoughts when the pages in front of me spoke of such pain. Pain – and I do not use this word lightly – has a special integrity, not to be denied. But selfish, I fear we all are. And I did ask myself whether I should have spent the past 31 years of my life cataloguing this awfulness. True, it was Alfred Hitchcock’s wonderful, funny movie Foreign Correspondent that persuaded me to go into journalism. But did it have to be like this? Not long ago, another dear friend wrote of me that I was “witty” (she also wrote that I was twice her age, which was a bit of a killer) – but I’m not sure that’s always true. You can’t wind the movie back when you are 61 years old. Wars do not un-do themselves. Your experiences remain with you, and I fear I have developed a dark, sometimes sinister view of the world. When I first arrived in Lebanon, in 1976, I believed in life. Heroes don’t die. Like Humphrey Haverstock – the hero of Foreign Correspondent – I was safe (a hero, of course!), happy in my romantic job, untouched by tragedy. I had friends who had died – human beings every bit as much as those who feature in these pictures – but somehow they died in theatrical terms; they were characters who were switched off, deleted from my contacts book. “Died, 1976,” I would write. There was a girl, once, whom I cared about and who died in Beirut and whom I forgot because I couldn’t stand the thought of remembering her. And I carried on, jumping on Middle East Airlines jets to Dubai or Paris or Amman, for Iran-Iraq wars or for dinner with friends or with the Plucky Little King (King Hussain, no less) and I would return to bombed-out Beirut, to the smell of burning garbage tips, which was somehow more real than the order and security of France or Britain or anywhere else in Europe. In the end, I think I did understand something about the Middle East, about its terrible tragedy, about our betrayal of its people. I’ve been welcomed into homes full of bereavement, treated with immense kindness and respect by men and women whose husbands, sons, daughters, wives, lovers, have been torn to pieces by munitions made in America and Britain and in France and Russia. God knows why they were so kind to me. When I was badly beaten on the Afghan border in 2001, I wrote that had I been an Afghan I would have done the same to Robert Fisk. Those who were trying to kill me had just lost their loved ones under an American air attack – a fact that those who chose to condemn me for my words always omitted to mention – yet I have lived an almost charmed life. Today, I sit on my balcony overlooking the Mediterranean and riffle through the pages of Double Blind and I thank whatever God controls our lives that I have not died and I think of the good, loyal friends who have protected me and cared for me and I feel a most fortunate man. Few can say that. Previous item: The Real Iraq Progress Report Next item: Rifts Deepen Between Iraqi Communities Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Charles Barton, August 23, 2007 at 12:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Fisk, if you don’t like war, stay away from Beirut.
Report thisBy hazmaq, August 22, 2007 at 8:38 pm #
Graciously said Mr. Fisk. As a well traveled mother I often feel the same way.
How the U.S. and our paid for Congress could deliberately turn their backs on one ‘fledgling democracy’ while allowing another to have it’s blood lust satisfied, was a real political eye-opener to millions. Both here and abroad.
Bush and Cheney have earned every harsh word said of them. Not because people dislike their religions, but solely because of their actions.
So too is the case with Israel.
In their minds it’s ok for Westerners to kill in ‘good faith’, and on moral grounds. And they both quickly run behind the symbolism of their respective faiths when threatened.
Hizb’allah and Hamas each arose out of the ashes of Israeli greed and arrogance, fueled by the weaponry and fearmongering of the West.
Israelis now suffer more from a massive case of paranoia than by any real threats.
They were granted Western favors for a reason, and must pay the appropriate tithe.
Looking at last summer’s war, in spite of all the raging rhetoric about a big Middle Eastern conspiracy against Israel, Hizb’allah’s weaponry consisted of little more than ‘rockets on a stick’ carried on foot or in beat up vehicles by a small contingent of savvy street fighting nationalists.
But one little pathetic fact jumped out at me as I read of the damage done to virtually every inch of Lebanon.
Not long before the war Israel had just lost a UN dairy contract, to Lebanon and Palestine.
Although far from any Hizb’allah strongholds, Israel destroyed both dairies.
Report thisBy cyrena, August 22, 2007 at 7:42 pm #
Based on my reading of Fisk, he’s not the least bit naive. Kind of hard to be THAT, when you’ve seen what he has, and experienced what he has in real time.
I think the problem might be that some folks just don’t like what he has to say. And, there may be some envy there as well.
Seems to me like there are some folks who think he knows stuff he isn’t telling. That makes ‘em kinda crazy too. Especially if what he IS telling, just isn’t the sort of thing they want the rest of the world to know.
But, I understand where Mr. Fisk is coming from. For a journalist of his generation, he has had a fortunate life experience. Only a true journalist/ethnographer could fully appreciate the passion and the -dare I say- “drama” that it includes.
Report thisBy weather, August 22, 2007 at 6:45 pm #
Israel is a hand grenade of Bad Karma.
A country who’s arrogance is only exceeded by their remarkable capacity for deceit - all very carefully gift wrapped and all at our immense expense.
Report thisBy mishari, August 22, 2007 at 2:31 pm #
lilmamzer’s response is typical.Is the message disturbing.Is it unpalatable?Shoot the messenger.In Fisk’s case,the fanatical partisans of the Zionist project in Occupied Palestine and the slack-jawed votaries of the neo-con fantasy,have been trying to shoot Fisk,(metaphorically),for 30 years.As the true extent of the failure of the neo-con project is revealed,as more rats desert the sinking neo-con ship,the more journalists like Fisk are demonized.The neo-con cretins believe that those who described them and their repellent agenda are the cause of their failure.It’s always someone else’s fault,right fellas?
Report thisPlu ca change,plu ca la meme chose…
By mick mordell, August 22, 2007 at 9:19 am #
How is it possible that one with Mr. Fisk’s long experience can remain so naive, so unclear on the concept. Perhaps the clue lies in the last paragraph wherein he thanks “whatever God controls our lives”. One need only scan to the horizon to see endless battle lines, army upon army prepared to kill and die on behalf of the “God that controls our lives”.
Report thisBy mickey, August 22, 2007 at 9:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
How is it possible that someone with Mr. Fisk’s undoubted long experience, remain so naive, so unclear on the concept. Perhaps the clue lies in his last paragraph when he thanks “whatever God controls our lives”. One need only scan the horizon to see the endless battle lines, army upon army, all ready to kill and die on behalf of the “God who controls our lives”.
Report thisBy lilmamzer, August 22, 2007 at 5:08 am #
Fisk’s is a life wasted in service of barbarism and apologism to the irrational hatreds of Arab Muslim politics.
Report this