|
|||
|
The Terror America WroughtPosted on Aug 7, 2007
During a week of mayhem in Iraq, in which terrorists have rightly been condemned for targeting schoolchildren, it is sobering to recall that this week is also the 62nd anniversary of a U.S. attack that deliberately took the lives of thousands of children on their way to school in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As noted in the Strategic Bombing Survey conducted at President Harry Truman’s request, when the bomb hit Hiroshima on April 6, 1945, “nearly all the school children ... were at work in the open,” to be exploded, irradiated or incinerated in the perfect firestorm that the planners back at the University of California-run Los Alamos lab had envisioned for the bomb’s maximum psychological impact. The terror plot worked all too well, as Hiroshima’s Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba recalled this week: “That fateful summer, 8:15 a.m. The roar of a B-29 breaks the morning calm. A parachute opens in the blue sky. Then suddenly, a flash, an enormous blast—silence—hell on Earth. The eyes of young girls watching the parachute were melted. Their faces became giant charred blisters. The skin of people seeking help dangled from their fingernails. ... Others died when their eyeballs and internal organs burst from their bodies—Hiroshima was a hell where those who somehow survived envied the dead.” Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japan’s decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base whose antiaircraft fire posed a higher risk. The target preferred by U.S. atomic scientists—a patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrain—was rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic. The victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were available soft targets, much like the children playing in Iraq, suddenly caught in the crossfire of battles waged beyond their control. In “White Light/Black Rain,” a devastating HBO documentary released this week, there is an interview with the sole survivor of a Japanese elementary school of 620 students. The murder of the other 619, and the 370,000 overall deaths attributed to the bombings, 85 percent of which were civilian deaths, has never compelled a widespread examination of the “end justifies the means” morality of our own state-sanctioned acts of terror. Indeed, the horrifying footage taken by Japanese and American cameramen soon after the devastation, and shown in the HBO film, was long kept secret by the U.S. government for fear that an informed American public might question this nation’s incipient nuclear arms race. Just exactly what distinguishes the United States’ use of the ever-so-cutely-named “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” atomic bombs on cities in Japan from the car bombs of Baghdad or the planes that smashed into the World Trade Center? To even raise the question, as was found in one recent university case, can be a career-ending move. Advertisement The subsequent release of formerly secret documents makes a hash of Truman’s rationalization. His White House was fully informed that the Japanese were on the verge of collapse, and their surrender was made all the more likely by the Soviets’ imminent entry into the fight. At most, the Japanese were asking for the face-saving gesture of retaining their emperor, and even that modest demand would likely have been abandoned with the shift of massive numbers of Allied troops and firepower from the battlefront of a defeated Germany to a confrontation with its deeply wounded Asian ally. Instead, the U.S. played midwife to the birth of the nuclear monster, the ultimate terrorist weapon that presents a continuing and growing threat to the survival of human life on Earth. This is a lesson to be pondered at a time when President Bush plays power games with a nuclear-equipped Russia while coddling Pakistan, the main proliferator of nuclear weapons to rogue regimes, and Congress authorizes an expansion of the U.S. nuclear program to better fight the war on terror by “improving” the ultimate weapon of terror, which the U.S. alone stands guilty of using. More links: For a fuller explanation of the suppression of footage taken shortly after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks, follow this link. Click here to go to HBO’s site for “White Light/Black Rain.”
Previous item: Radio for the People Next item: Chris Hedges and the 'Other War' New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Elder Earl, August 9, 2007 at 11:18 am Link to this comment
#93381 by 127001 on 8/09 at 5:16 am
(55 comments total)
Re: comment by Inference Yup! A nice reminder of a quote by a wise man.
As for Elder Earl ... My gag reflex went into overdrive.
Hope you never did breed and dont!
Your ignorance does not determine how I should breed. As for your gag reflex I suggest you see a doctor or maybe it is your liberal diet you need to change.
I see our country moving under the Bush leadership as a good thing. It is sad for radicals of Islam to be willing to sacrifice their wives and children for heretical beliefs. And what is worse is the liberal bias taken by Robert Scheer in comparing the Truman act as those of a terrorist.
Report thisBy 1drees, August 9, 2007 at 10:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
yo, godsend lets be logical & safe, lets not suggest selling everything.
Report thisBy Brent Turner, August 9, 2007 at 10:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Good article, but you got the date wrong (it was in AUGUST, not APRIL, 1945):
As noted in the Strategic Bombing Survey conducted at President Harry Trumans request, when the bomb hit Hiroshima on April 6, 1945, nearly all the school children ... were at work in the open, to…
Report thisBy pete miller, August 9, 2007 at 10:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
although i agree with the effects of the bomb on the japanese it is quintessential hindsight to assume that surrender was ‘just around the corner’. conviently you don’t mention the civilians ground up by the japanese! ask the people in nanking and many other countries. do you also separate what the germans did to london or the jews!! also we only had 2 bombs to use to gain the advantage. there was some question as to whether these would work and what the effect would be. considering how fiercly the japanese had fought until then why would we assume they would stop if we blew up another fort ? and why wasn’t there an immediate surrender after the first bomb? no, you’re grasping at straws here but certainly iraq is the worst military action yet by this country!
Report thisBy RonPaulforPrez, August 9, 2007 at 10:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Some of the comments made about the facts behind the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are astounding.
1. Before the bombing of Hiroshima the Japanese Military was contemplating a coup to prevent any discussion of surrender. Even after the Bombing of Nagasaki some Japan’s Generals attempted a coup to prevent Hirohito from surrendering. I don’t think they were as close to surrender as people are making out.
2. During World War II Japan suffered 580,000 civilian casualites, by comparison they murdered over 25 Million civilians throught Asia. Forgive me if I don’t view them as the peace loving nation people are trying to portray here.
Report thisBy John, August 9, 2007 at 9:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Personally, I find the irony in liberal viewpoints completely hilarious. You are all about what terrorists the United States is when it comes to innocent civilians, children especially. However, you are all in favor of abortion on demand, all the way up to late term abortion occurring shortly before birth. I am surprised that given your stance you don’t consider incinerating 300,000 civilians a form of retroactive abortion. Of course, if you did see things that way, then everything would be just fine and the people holding your particular viewpoint would have nothing to whine and complain about. God forbid, a liberal without a complaint.
Report thisBy GodSend, August 9, 2007 at 9:20 am Link to this comment
Anyone interested in reading about The Terror Zionists (Greenspan & Bernanke - the Sorcerer and his Apprentice) Have Wrought in the American Economy? If not, you will experience the Terror (Grand Depression) on your own body VERY SOON! Better read about it NOW while there is still time to do something about it! (SELL your stocks, SELL your investments, SELL your house - Good Luck!)
Here’s the wake-up call:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18119.htm?ref=patrick.net
Report thisBy Andrew, August 9, 2007 at 8:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Re: #93299 by Douglas Chalmers
Thank you Doug for your comment to my posting. I will not argue with what you say since it is entirely accurate. I was merely thinking about the victims of Japanese aggression (who were not personally guilty of their countrys sins any more than you or I are for Bushs), and the fact that the Japanese did not demonstrate much pity when they had the upper hand. To put it in other words, the Japanese seem more sensitive to their pain than the pain they inflicted on others. Of course that applies equally to the USA remember Newsweeks cover story Charlie Company What Vietnam did to us (should read Charlie Company what WE DID TO VIETNAM).
All war is immoral. The thing is - don’t start one because as there are no rules in war, you cannot foresee how it will evolve or end, and you may not like the result. The Japanese gambled and lost.
As far as the USA is concerned, I think we have a long litany of sins to atone for, and that we persist in stupid and immoral wars of aggression. This merely serves to alienate the entire planet which I do not think is good thing in a moral sense or indeed beneficial to our long term interests in a practical sense. We have to clean out the outhouse and the best place to start is at home, but that is impossible given the complete sidelining of the populace in the selection and exercise of Power. Look at the Democrats winning on the wave of public discontent and not even slapping Bush on the wrist. I think the country is in thrall to a Jewish American lobby who seems more concerned about the fate of Israel than the USA - why else would they foist policies that are detrimental to the very USA? They are like a swarm of locusts picking at the carcass of the USA, or Clement Vallandingham in the Civil War. They certainly do not care about the country, nor the fact that it is universally loathed throughout the planet. The press refer to Israel as an ally an ally in my book is someone who helps you. I do not see how the State of Israels intransigent policies help the USA. Someone please explain this to me.
Any discussion of this leads to immediate accusations of being anti semitic, thereby conveniently short circuiting any intelligent examination of underlying issues (which is the goal of the accusation of course).
I unfortunately do not see any positive issue to this conundrum
Frankly, I think the money spent on Iraq would have been more efficiently spent on subsidizing Saddam to keep things quiet and the price of oil low whilst we invested in developing stable renewable alternative energy sources and a transport infrastructure suitable for a post Hubbard Peak scenario at home. It would also have been a less bloody option. But that alas, does not suit the agenda of the AIPAC community, the paid insects who scribble their poison in their subsidised Think Tanks, and the Halliburton / Brown and Root / Blackwater business elites who profit handsomely from the quagmire and looting of our public coffers in lucrative no bid contracts. For “Quagmire” in yours and my book = “several years of stable operating cash flows which optimise ROE and P/E ratios and improve our credit ratings” in their books. Major Smedley Butler, twice recipient of the Medal of Honor and a Marine hit the nail on the head with his treatise War is a Racket.
These issues, of course, are subsumed in a wave of patriotic hysteria. Our poor fellow Americans clutch the flag like Charlie Browns security blanket and fail to see that patiotism isn’t about waving a piece of cloth and shooting up a bunch of natives in Sand Creek, My Lai, or Haditha. It is about concern of the welfare of your fellow co-citizens which constitute the body politic and your home.
All we can do is sit on the hill and watch the terrible yet fascinating train wreck.
Report thisBy Don Knutsen, August 9, 2007 at 8:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Apparently Elder Earl considers the death of 3/4 of a million Iraqi’s, and the displacement of over 3 million as a clensing by the righteous Eagle of Iraq ? I hear all those carpet bombs and irradiated ordinance keep clensing long after the conflict is over too, what a bargain. Don’t you suppose all this “clensing” is going to drive more muslims to want to get over hear to do some “clensing” of their own ? Why is it that when we drop a 500 lb bomb in a neighborhood its justified and when an insurgent blows himself up in a market place its a terrorist act ? Its the same mentality, using religion to excuse death and destruction for power. How many times do we have to repeat this luunacy before we wake up ? Earl, in a former life were you up front with the conquistidors as they used the catholic religion to savage latin america decimating whole civilizations ? Perhaps you wouldv’e had a chair at the spanish inquisition ? Or the slaughter of Constanopal and Jerusalem during the crusades ? Sounds like just another one of the conservative religous boobs who helped elect this criminal administration.
Report thisBy Atlas Collins, August 9, 2007 at 7:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I thank God everyday for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as my father was on a troop transport in August of 1945 heading toward Japan. He would have been among the first waves of the projected invasion force of the Japanese home islands, and based upon past battles and island incursions against the Japs, his prospects for survival were not too good.
As far as I’m concerned, the saving of a single American life was well worth a couple hundred thousand nuclear fried Nips, and if the vile America-hating scumbag communist filthstain Robert Scheer doesn’t like that he can kiss my Red, White and Blue America-LOVING behind.
Atlas Collins
Report thisBy Sam Deakins, August 9, 2007 at 7:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What a moron this guy is. If only we could end the Islamic jihad with a couple of well placed nukes.
Report thisBy Skruff, August 9, 2007 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Elder Earl
“Since America is typically represented by an eagle.”
The Third Reich was also represented (typically) by an eagle. and they believed (as you)that they would be the “cleansing agent” in the middle east.
OOps, didn’t work.
I attempt to be civil in all my posts, but your reference to killing Japanese women and children because;
“Those same civilians breed new soldiers, engineers, scientist, factory workers,...”
sounde very similar to John Milton Chivington’s rationalization for killing Cheyenne women and children at Sand Creek, Colorado in 1864; He said;
“Nits breed lice”
I’m sorry, but this position is disgusting. and since I’m responsible for my employee’s behavior, I have to feel deep shame.
Report thisBy 127001, August 9, 2007 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
Re: comment by Inference… Yup! A nice reminder of a quote by a wise man.
As for Elder Earl ... My gag reflex went into overdrive.
Hope you never did “breed” and don’t!
Report thisBy vera, August 9, 2007 at 5:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
874356475
Hi Friends,
I Find Absolutely FREE PlayBoy & Penthouse:
http://www.oxpe.net/playboy/
If I find something else I’ll inform you.
Best Regards,
Report thisVera
By Guisseppe, August 9, 2007 at 4:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
ALL of you assholes ought to be worried about TODAY and the future, instead of squandering time about the past!!! america is dying and you worry about japs and jews! FOLLY!
Report thisBy larry, August 9, 2007 at 4:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Common excuses for justification of mass murder of innocents.
Report this1) They started it
2) They would not surrender
3) We behaved beneficently after the war.
None of this matters. You cannot commit mass murder of innocents for these or any reasons. Even this country itself will not last forever, at least in its present incarnation, and what should its legacy be to history? That we killed as many civilians as it took to WIN as war? That unconditional surrender as established as the gold standard for war was perhaps the most pernicious result to emerge from WWII.
By Elder Earl, August 9, 2007 at 4:25 am Link to this comment
You mean Michael Medved doesn’t know what he is talking about. Beside I personal think the only way to deal with radical Islam is by absolute authority. The British knew it and stayed in Ireland until they accomplished the task at hand.
It is amazing how radical reason with their sons and daughters lives and make out like it is our fault they are being killed. I think the solution is in what Golden said “The killing will stop when they love their children more than they hate us.” So we as a nation are in for the long haul just as the British were with Ireland Republic Army.
Report thisBy diogenes, August 9, 2007 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Given the history, and history is the key word here, of the behavior of the U.S. prior to WWII, it’s no wonder we were attacked…then as now.
The Devil may be in the details, but there is much to be learned from a broad overview of history (there’s that pesky word again). We are not different from our neighbors.
Report thisCulture is the cloth in which we wrap our humanity.
Given the size of the world…we are all neighbors. All governments are ruled by scoundrels, with rare exception, and we must, to the best of our abilities, cast off the blinders of ethnocentricity before we can truly consider ourselves to be liberated. Seeing is not possible with the eyes alone. The real history of our planet may yet be discovered and revealed in the far distant future. It will not be comforting and is not completely available to us now.
By Douglas Chalmers, August 9, 2007 at 3:15 am Link to this comment
#93346 by Elder Earl on 8/09 at 2:56 am: : “...Great Britain recently observed an historic milestone that sends a powerful message to the United States. After 27 years of conflict, the British officially ended their military presence in Northern Ireland. At one time, they maintained 106 bases and 27,000 troops in the embattled province…”
Lessons on Iraq From Northern Ireland, duh, you don’t know what you’re atlking about - sorry, Earl, if you want to be considered as an “elder”, then consider this…..
The British left N.Ireland because they couldn’t be bothered with the place any longer. They (Britain) had already been bought by the Saudi Arabs who now use the country as some kind of arms factory now anyway.
The arranged truce between Gerry Adams and that roaring numbskull, Ian Paisley (N.Ireland’s answer to Ariel Sharon), was about the same week that their former prime minister (what’s-his-name) announced that the british government would do nothing about the corruption which saw fighter aircraft manufacturer BAE provide Saudi sheikhs will $100’s millions (or pounds?) as kickbacks for the deal.
Its all a political farce. If you want to know what the Brits are really like, search “Irish plantations” and see how they practiced on each other before they invaded and colonised America and half of the rest of the world!
Quote: “Colonization and conquest of Ireland by English and Scottish settlers from 1556 to 1660. There were several rebellions against the plantation by the Irish and the Anglo-Irish aristocracy. Major plantations included the Munster plantation, from 1586, and the Ulster plantation, from 1609. The final stages of the conquest took place under Cromwell. See also Ireland: history 1603 to 1782, Protestant settlement and the rule of Strafford….” Also see http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/othelem/facets.htm
Report thisBy Elder Earl, August 9, 2007 at 2:56 am Link to this comment
Lessons on Iraq From Northern Ireland
Michael Medved
Great Britain recently observed an historic milestone that sends a powerful message to the United States. After 27 years of conflict, the British officially ended their military presence in Northern Ireland. At one time, they maintained 106 bases and 27,000 troops in the embattled province, but growing cooperation between Catholics and Protestants in the Northern Irish government, and the disarming of sectarian militias, now make British troops unnecessary.
A succession of prime ministers, both Tory and Labour, wisely defied calls for a premature pullout from those who insisted that Her Majesty’s forces had no business in the midst of a seemingly endless civil war. As with American troops in Korea, the decades-long British presence has been costly, dangerous and controversial, but ultimately allowed reconciliation and stability to take hold.
A similar outcome in Iraq is a distinct possibility, but only if the United States maintains a patient focus on the long-term horizon and our national interest.
Report thisBy Elder Earl, August 9, 2007 at 2:10 am Link to this comment
sungraffix
Thanks for the correction…However it does not change the liberal bias of the writer.
QU0TE: Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japans decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base whose antiaircraft fire posed a higher risk. The target preferred by U.S. atomic scientistsa patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrainwas rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic. end/quote
Those same civilians breed new soldiers, engineers, scientist, factory workers,...etc…who act upon the authority of those who rule.
Report thisBy Inference, August 8, 2007 at 11:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Where there is a stink of shit, there is a smell of being.Antonin Artaud
Report thisBy Giordan Smith, August 8, 2007 at 10:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
#93198 by Macko
As an historian who’s been working on a book about the end of the war for some years now, I’d have to go along with this interpretation. Macko, you’re 100% on the money.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, August 8, 2007 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment
#93173 by Billy Bob on 8/08 at 1:18 pm: “...Er. uh, when will the Japanese, as a people and as a nation, show contrition for actions in China and Korea well before the incident at Pearl Harbor? When will the Japanese show contrition for their treatment of Occidental prisoners of war…?”
Well, many have but their government is still rooted in refusal and denial. Before it was Koizumi and now it is Abe (same political party) but to a lesser extent. He and they might not be around in government much longer anyway.
The Yasakuni shrine in Tokyo is a center of controversy and visits to it by successive prime ministers has inevitably inflamed relations particularly with the Koreas and China. Much of the problem stems from the fact that there is a war museum next door. The shrine itself is only commemorating their own war dead.
*****************************************************
#93139 by Andrew on 8/08 at 9:48 am: “...On the anniversary of the Hiroshima Atomic Bombing, I always think about the multiple bayoneting and raping of Chinese civilians by the Japanese in Nanking, the Bataan Death March where thousands of American and Filipino POWs were summarily beheaded and perished, the summary seizure and execution of the entire French Colonial Administration in Hanoi (including civilians) on 9 March 1945, and the seizure of “comfort women” by the Japanese….... The Mayor of Hiroshima seems to forget to ask the central question of why the atomic bombing occurred….”
Umm, the French selfishly and malevolently re-invaded Vietnam and Cambodia (and Algeria, etc) after WW2. They couldn’t give a damn about human rights then and neither did the Dutch who did the same in Indonesia or the Belgians in Africa. Lets forget about them as far as this topic is concerned.
And don’t let us forget that the USA replaced the Spanish as colonial oppressors in the Philippines from 1898 until the Japanese arrived. Philipinos had suffered about 400 years of Western military domination by the time the USA returned - after abandoning them to the Japanese.
So much for MacArthur’s “I shall return” promise of a military aggressor. He then based himself in Brisbane Australia and had prepared to sacrifice two-thirds or more of that country to the Japanese if necessary. Australian POW’s and those fighting in New Guinea or N.Africa or W.Europe must have been really impressed.
Perhaps best now that we do “...compare somebody who started a war with somebody who ended one…”(#93102 by anonymous on 8/08 at 6:34 am) as it involves many things in many locations and a complex web of very chequered history going back to before the opium wars in China. Nothing the USA did was so wonderful in any way.
That is perhaps why the Mayor of Hiroshima should have begun asking questions of the USA, Andrew, as well as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. They have been too coy about the real situation and the events preceding the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the US military. Its now time that the real story was brought out into the open - before yet another nuclear victim is found by the US Neocon maniacal aggressors and exploiters - in Iran!
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, August 8, 2007 at 9:48 pm Link to this comment
#93175 by vet240 on 8/08 at 1:28 pmThe Atomic bomb was used to demonstrate to the Japanese the futility of continued resistance….”
Yes, and that is the ultimate racist statement from 1945. As it was a ‘demonstration’ set up for the Chinese and the Russians (USSR back then), it was the assertion of US imperiaist naked military aggression which had been worked up to since the Spanish-American war in 1898…..... then “the American Eagle’s wing span of 10,000 miles” from Cuba to China!!!
******************************************************
#93107 by Crimson Ghost on 8/08 at 7:15 am: “...The atomic bombing of Japan has often been cited as “payback” for the attack on Pearl Harbor. .....almost all of the 3000 or so American killed at Pearl Harbor were MILITARY personnel. ......most of the 300,000 or so JAPANESE killed by the atomic bombs were CIVILIANS. .......the US today is openly contemplating a Pearl Harbor type surprise attack on Iran. Apparently a sneak attack is the OK when we do but horrendous if somebody does it to us…..”.
Actually, Pearl Harbor came out of the previous 50 years and the US involvement in gunboat diplomacy and oppression of both China and Japan. That was why I mentioned the Spanish-American war in 1898 because it gave the USA a base in the Phillipines for its navy and it could then project power where it really wanted to on the West side of the Pacific.
Report thisBy Matt, August 8, 2007 at 9:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
No matter what we say or do to make ourselves feel better about the way we live as a species, we all will get what we deserve in the end. What it is, we will never know in life, but in death, you can bet your ass you’re going to find out, good or bad. Choose how you live, wisely…
Report thisBy GodSend, August 8, 2007 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment
This one is interesting! Read it all the way to the bottom.
http://zionismexplained.org/
Next, read this one:
http://www.ziopedia.org/
Now this one:
http://www.nowarforisrael.com/
Now ask yourself: Why would ANYONE in America in their right mind, give Billions in military aid each year (in addition to $3 Billion of non-military aid) to the Rogue State of Israel? It boggles the mind - UNLESS there is a hidden and VERY LARGE ‘Israel Lobby’ running America! - for all practical purposes
And let’s remember that ‘tiny and poor little Israel’ possesses 400+ illegal nukes and one of the most technologically advanced Militaries in the world! Did I mention deceptive and ruthless? Check out ‘Checkpoint’ (DVD) if you have any doubts.
Why won’t they fight their wars themselves? Could it be because they think that 1 drop of Zionist blood is worth rivers of goyim blood? And we’re talking mostly goyim American blood here!
Think about it!
Report thisBy ocjim, August 8, 2007 at 8:21 pm Link to this comment
One must admire Scheer for his willingness to say what needs to be said. For too long we have glossed over or rationalized our actions because of the belief that we are chosen to prosper by a supreme being. It takes a mediocre megalomaniac like Bush to wake us up to the truth. Our relationship with God is personal. He does not carte blanche favor one or the other. We must deal with the fact that we sacrifice innocent people and justify it in a Machiavellian way just like Rove justifies his many sins.
Report thisBy Howard, August 8, 2007 at 8:04 pm Link to this comment
Three big hurrahs for HARRY TRUMAN !
Report thisBy sungraffix, August 8, 2007 at 7:53 pm Link to this comment
Koran 9:11 Refers to the American Military Action in Iraq? - FICTION!
This is a hoax.
Report thisThe quote is not from anywhere in the Koran (or Quran).
Chapter 9 verse 11 actually says “But if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, they are your brethren in faith; and we make the communications clear for a people who know.” (M. H. Shakir translation)
By Paolo, August 8, 2007 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment
The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes, pure and simple. So was the fire-bombing of Dresden. All were deliberate targetings of defenseless civilians.
In a just world, Harry S Truman would have been tried and hanged for these crimes against humanity.
There is ample evidence Japan was ready to discuss terms of surrender. But America held out, in typical stupid, macho fashion, for the ridiculous idea of “unconditional surrender.”
Report thisBy Heather Dodge, August 8, 2007 at 7:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Most don’t know that Hiroshima and Nagasaki followed the relentless U.S. firebombing/napalming of 67 Japanese cities. If I can copy/paste the list from film, The Fog of War, I’ll do so here. If that doesn’t work, please see the film.
Name of Japanese city firebombed
Percentage of the city destroyed
Equivalent in size to the following American city
Yokohama 58 Cleveland
Report thisTokyo 51 New York
Toyama 99 Chattanooga
Nagoya 40 Los Angeles
Osaka 35.1 Chicago
Nishinomiya 11.9 Cambridge
Siumonoseki 37.6 San Diego
Kure 41.9 Toledo
Kobe 55.7 Baltimore
Omuta 35.8 Miami
Wakayama 50 Salt Lake City
Kawasaki 36.2 Portland
Okayama 68.9 Long Beach
Yawata 21.2 San Antonio
Kagoshima 63.4 Richmond
Amagasaki 18.9 Jacksonville
Sasebo 41.4 Nashville
Moh 23.3 Spokane
Miyakonoio 26.5 Greensboro
Nobeoka 25.2 Augusta
Miyazaki 26.1 Davenport
Hbe 20.7 Utica
Saga 44.2 Waterloo
Imabari 63.9 Stockton
Matsuyama 64 Duluth
Fukui 86 Evansville
Tokushima 85.2 Ft. Wayne
Sakai 48.2 Forth Worth
Hachioji 65 Galveston
Kumamoto 31.2 Grand Rapids
Isezaki 56.7 Sioux Falls
Takamatsu 67.5 Knoxville
Akashi 50.2 Lexington
Fukuyama 80.9 Macon
Aomori 30 Montgomery
Okazaki 32.2 Lincoln
Oita 28.2 Saint Joseph
Hiratsuka 48.4 Battle Creek
Tokuyama 48.3 Butte
Yokkichi 33.6 Charlotte
Uhyamada 41.3 Columbus
Ogaki 39.5 Corpus Christi
Gifu 63.6 Des Moines
Shizuoka 66.1 Oklahoma City
Himeji 49.4 Peoria
Fukuoka 24.1 Rochester
Kochi 55.2 Sacramento
Shimizu 42 San Jose
Omura 33.1 Sante Fe
Chiba 41 Savannah
Ichinomiya 56.3 Sprinfield
Nara 69.3 Boston
Tsu 69.3 Topeka
Kuwana 75 Tucson
Toyohashi 61.9 Tulsa
Numazu 42.3 Waco
Chosi 44.2 Wheeling
Kofu 78.6 South Bend
Utsunomiya 43.7 Sioux City
Mito 68.9 Pontiac
Sendai 21.9 Omaha
Tsuruga 65.1 Middleton
Nagaoka 64.9 Madison
Hitachi 72 Little Rock
Kumagaya 55.1 Kenosha
Hamamatsu 60.3 Hartford
Maebashi 64.2 Wheeling
By 911truthdotorg, August 8, 2007 at 7:07 pm Link to this comment
Stealing a Nation video-
another reason why the world hates us.
“This tells a story literally ‘hidden from history’. In the 1960s and 70s, British governments, conspiring with American officials, tricked into leaving, then expelled the entire population of the Chagos islands in the Indian Ocean. The aim was to give the principal island of this Crown Colony, Diego Garcia, to the Americans who wanted it as a major military base. Indeed, from Diego Garcia US planes have since bombed Afghanistan and Iraq. The story is told by islanders who were dumped in the slums of Mauritius and in the words of the British officials who left a ‘paper trail’ of what the International Criminal Court now describes as ‘a crime against humanity’
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/stealing_a_nation.htm
Google videos: 9/11 Press for Truth, Loose Change 2nd Edition, America: Freedom to Faacism
Report thisBy Elder Earl, August 8, 2007 at 6:48 pm Link to this comment
Read all of this one, it is interesting!! Read down to the very bottom see what the Koran has said.
I hope this will correct Robert Scheer liberal bias.
VERY INTERESTING-
1. The Garden of Eden was in Iraq .
2. Mesopotamia, which is now Iraq, was the cradle of civilization!
3. Noah built the ark in Iraq .
4 The Tower of Babel was in Iraq
5. Abraham was from Ur, which is in Southern Iraq !
6. Isaac’s wife Rebekah is from Nahor, which is in Iraq !
7. Jacob met Rachel in Iraq.
8. Jonah preached in Nineveh - which is in Iraq .
9. Assyria, which is in Iraq, conquered the ten tribes of Israel.
10 Amos cried out in Iraq !
11. Babylon, which is in Iraq, destroyed Jerusalem .
12. Daniel was in the lion’s den in Iraq !
13. The three Hebrew children were in the fire in Iraq (Jesus had been in Iraq also as the fourth person in the Fiery Furnace!)
14. Belshazzar, the King of Babylon saw the “writing on the wall” in Iraq .
15. Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, carried the Jews captive into Iraq .
16. Ezekiel preached in Iraq .
17. The wise men were from Iraq.
18. Peter preached in Iraq .
19. The “Empire of Man” described in Revelation is called Babylon, which was a city in Iraq !
And you have probably seen this one: Israel is the nation most often mentioned in the Bible. But do you know which nation is second? It is Iraq ! However, that is not the name that is used in the Bible. The names used in the Bible are Babylon , Land of Shinar , and Mesopotamia . The word Mesopotamia means between the two rivers, more exactly between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. The name Iraq , means country with deep roots.
Indeed Iraq is a country with deep roots and is a very significant country in the Bible.
No other nation, except Israel , has more history and prophecy associated with it than Iraq .
And also, This is something to think about: Since America is typically represented by an eagle. Saddam should have read up on his Muslim passages..
The following verse is from the Koran, (the Islamic Bible)
Koran (9:11 ) - For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle. The wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo, while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced; for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah;
and there was peace.
Report this(Note the verse number!) Hmmmmmmm?!
By GodSend, August 8, 2007 at 6:02 pm Link to this comment
And, if Russia won’t cooperate, Yahweh has other means at His disposal - Comets from the Outer Oort Cloud, for example ( it will be ‘history repeated’ )! It’s the Coma that can do the trick. What do you think, Mr. Sharon?
Report thisBy GodSend, August 8, 2007 at 5:44 pm Link to this comment
The terror in Iraq is master-minded (if not actually conducted, in part) by Israeli Zionist infiltrators (Mossad and IDF) who think things are going just great in Iraq. The more chaos and death (and more Iraqis head for the exits), the better the chances of Iraq being partitioned into 3 or more sparsely populated Statelets (Kurds, Shias, Sunnis) - just the end result that Israel has been dreaming about!
Then the process is repeated for the remaining ME States (Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia - in no particular order) and Voila! - Balkanization has been achieved. That’s the Israeli PNIC plan, anyway. Unfortunately, Russia will absolutely NOT stand for that as a permanent geopolitical solution! Ergo, MIRV nukes missile will turn Israel into Desert Glass, if all else fails. You might call that Ezekiel prophecy fulfilled: “....and I will leave them there {the rebellious house of Israel} and MELT them.”
The Zionist plan is fiendish! (‘Devilish’ is even better). ‘Thank You’, our American Zionist friends, for making our dream come true - and paying for this ‘dream-come-true’ with all of America’s blood and treasure!
The only problem will be, that after America’s blood and treasure has been spent, we’ll discover (to our horror) that Yahweh has other ideas! He’s had them for quite a while now. 
Bottom Line: The Terror Zionist Israel Wrought!
Report thisBy Mstessyrue, August 8, 2007 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
This country and this war are in desperate need of radical changes. First and foremost is the need to pull our troops out of Iraq and stop the violence, poverty and terror that we are creating overseas as well as in our homes. Even now, President Bush would not admit defeat and the fact that this war is a disaster. The Bush administration has yet to recognize the Iraq war is a complete failure and mistake. There are more critical issues that affecting the lives of millions of americans and people world wide that our president is not taking actions against. Now the war has proven to be a failure and is causing more violence, terror and poverty in this world. According to the Borgen Project, it only takes $19 billion dollars annually to eradicate world hunger and poverty. However, our government has already spent more than $450 billion dollars over this fruitless war in Iraq. It is time for the Bush Administration to take a real interest in the lives of the American people as well as people who are in desperate needs around the world. Stop the lies and stop poverty now. Put away the arrogance and put the needs of the people before political gains.
Report thisBy Macko, August 8, 2007 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Oops…my error.
I wrote that the Soviets declared war 3 days after Hiroshima. That was a mistake, it was 2 days after Hiroshima and 1 day short of Nagasaki. They’re timing was the truly significant aspect…they were desperate to get a piece of Japan…but Truman wasn’t going to allow it. And so it went…and so it goes…
Report thisBy Alan, August 8, 2007 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Schneer…
In your report you seem to give the impression that Eisenhower was consulted. He was not.
He was informed by Stimson that they were going to drop it. But he was never officially asked for his opinion, and his feelings did not become known publically till long after.
“The incident took place in 1945 when Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. I was not, of course, called upon, officially, for any advice or counsel concerning the matter, because the European theater, of which I was the commanding general, was not involved, the forces of Hitler having already been defeated. But the Secretary, upon giving me the news of the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using it, asked for my reaction, apparently expecting a vigorous assent.
“During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of “face.” The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude, almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusions.”(General Eisenhower, The White House Years, pp. 312-313).
Report thisBy Macko, August 8, 2007 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I think it appropriate to mention that the Soviet Union declared war on Japan 62 years ago today. Please note, that put it’s declaration at 3 days AFTER Hiroshima and 1 day BEFORE Nagasaki. Curious timing, wouldn’t you say?
I believe this is a key to one of the dirty little secrets regarding the REAL reason that the atomic bombs were used on Japan…i.e. the bombings were more about saber rattling for the benefit of the Soviets, who had their eyes on the prize, aka Japan, than it was about defeating Japan (which was already all but defeated). The Soviets wanted to do to Japan what was done to Germany, namely, to split it up and have each ally get a juicy piece of the pie. Truman however, wanted Japan for the US only…and he was willing to butcher as many Japanese (or Japs in his parlance) as possible to make his bloody point to the Soviets…which was, go ahead and try it, and see what happens when we drop a bomb on Moscow! These attacks were a direct threat against the Soviet Union…made so clear by the timing of their war declaration, which the US government certainly saw coming. Timing is everything in international affairs, and the timing of these bombings couldn’t have been more precise…thanks to Los Alamos meeting the schedule.
The end result of all this? The arms race, which the Soviets joined as a result of the clear threat from the US, became a multi-decade exercise in futility and desperation…and greed.
And thus was created the war profiteers dearest dream, the Cold War (which by definition could not be fought) as an engine of endless profits for decades to come (over 5 trillion dollars of US tax dollars spent, without Congressional oversight, between 1945-1995). Truman almost single-handedly created the world that I was born into, one that ALWAYS included the threat of global thermonuclear war at a moments notice. Fear was the order of the day, and fear drove people not to question…a lot like today.
Report thisBy Inference, August 8, 2007 at 3:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
From the mind of monumental GORE VIDAL:
Report thisIt is not possible to regard our race with anything but alarm… From primeval ooze to the stars, we killed anything that stood in our way, including each other.
By Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 3:03 pm Link to this comment
#93182 by Chris on 8/08 at 1:56 pm
Spare a few planes, to bomb the railroad, and that would have saved the Jews.
How long does it takes to repair a section of rail, do you have any idea what, you think once would do it. We bombed airfields one day, and they had airplanes flying out the next. Not only that, we bombed railroad yards on a regular basis.
I find the logic appalling.
Report thisBy Andrew, August 8, 2007 at 2:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
To dear little hysterical 1drees
It is obvious that you do not like the USA, based on your hysterical text (which is a fairly understandable reaction given our obscene and bullying policies), but since this is a discussion forum instead of an insult session, what exactly is the point you are trying to make? Why don’t you learn how to organise your ideas and write- clearly instead of throwing mud like a frustrated child?
Your text is an incoherent mess full of insults but absent of any intelligent observations or constructive suggestions. It illustrates the intellectual vacuity of your mind, and of contemporary Arab (or is that Islamic) thinking, fostered by your failing educational systems, which teach submission but not critical self analysis.
Your rant is typically Arab/Islamic in that it is hysterical but incoherent and directionless, a slave to your emotions. People from your culture don’t even have the clarity of thought on how to change a spare tire or a lightbulb. That is why you will always be Arabs, driving like disorganised maniacs, ignoring traffic discipline, safety, and rules, on your potholed roads (while your governments park the country’s money in their Swiss Bank Accounts), in your unwashed, dirty, and poorly maintained cars where the radiators burst and the brakes fail but your car radios blast wailing music.
Your letter illustrates perfectly the intellectual vacuity fostered by your culture: your individual intellectual vacuity which is overruled by your inability to control your emotions, your collective lack of intellectual or organisational discipline as a people (who keep their homes clean but throw their garbage on the sidewalks), and the corrupt and irresponsible nature of your selfish governments which divert your countries’ physical and financial resources from modernising your countries, and tendency to BLAME THESE FAILURES ON OTHER PEOPLE, be they Western individuals/multinationals/countries.
You Arabs say you hate us but in reality you respect us - enough to always ask us for money. I live in one of your countries and that is the limit of my contact with your people - all they do is ask me for money but they never want to have the discipline of working hard for that money. They all dream or moving to Europe. And at the root of this (and your rant) is the ultimate truth - you Arabs have no self respect. It is the penultimate result of your religion. To “submit”.
That is why Israel, despite its numerous faults and obscene political characteristics, will always dominate the Arab World and people like you. Despite their loss of morality and empathy for their fellow human beings, Israelis have an intellectual rigour and discipline for hard work which Arabs (or is that the Islamic World) lacks, and which your rant illustrates perfectly.
Report thisBy Chris, August 8, 2007 at 1:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m getting in late on the conversations about whether America “saved” European Jewry from Hitler, and the comment was made about U.S. forces liberating the death camps late in the war, because they were already in Germany, which was accurate.
I have seen the memo, I believe from the State Department, where someone from that organization was responding to requests to bomb either the camps or the railroad lines. It actually came down to an ACCOUNTING DECISION. Which was laid out in mathematical detail, why they couldn’t spare just a FEW aircraft to bomb the railroad lines.
The comment was made, at the end of the memo, that the best thing the United States could do to stop the killing of the Jews was just to win the war as quickly as possible.
Oh, yea, that’s a big help, alright. They could have intervened and saved possibly thousands of lives, in the meantime, but they just couldn’t spare a few planes…
Just sickening…
Report thisBy 127001, August 8, 2007 at 1:53 pm Link to this comment
I agree with Charity. And I’ll go further. Americans are passive aggressive narcissists. Look up the definitions, then look around. The current Administration actually reflects most of its society, disgusting as that sounds.
The American people (majority) are not “Warriors.” Good grief! Look around!
They are bullies and gangsters. Go outside the U.S. for a few months. And if you can’t recognize “violence” when its not a physical type, then you haven’t gotten the education you should have simply by living and interacting with others.
Report thisBy Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment
#93175 by vet240 on 8/08 at 1:28 pm
Good analysis, succinct and accurate.
It is not unusual for people to get caught-up in the particulars of a whole and loose track of realities. Measured against an Ideal, and isolated in time the idea sounds morally repugnant. Then when anti-American phrasemongers and windbags carpet bomb the news with that narrow view logic flies out the window.
Report thisBy Jon, August 8, 2007 at 1:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Are we getting a little off the subject?
Report thisScheer’s point, as I understand it, is that targeting civilians in order to dramatize one’s ability and willingness to do whatever it takes to “win” is essentially equal to targeting civilians in order to dramatize one’s ability and willingness to do whatever it takes to “win.”
There aren’t a lot of things in this world that are black and white, but one thing pretty much every civilized human being can agree on is that the taking of even a single innocent life in order to demonstrate the willingness to do whatever it takes to “win” (achieve one’s goal) is “terrorism,” that the target audience has been “terrorized,” and that anyone guilty of doing so is a “terrorist.”
By vet240, August 8, 2007 at 1:28 pm Link to this comment
The real lesson here is what happens to a nation that becomes blindly obedient to their leaders. It demonstrates what happens when a nation decides that making war is a viable option to diplomacy and mutual respect for other nations needs. It demonstrates what happens when the Military and the Industrial complex of a nation decide they have mutual interests that can best be exploited in a time of war.
I believe we were responding to the Japenese in the most humane way available to us.
They Japenese had raped and killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands as they occupied most of the major pacific islands and mainland China and other Asian nations.
The Japenese demonstrated a complete devotion to their Emperor by fighting and dying almost to the last man in each battle we fought. Their tenacity and resolve became stronger as we approached their homeland.
Our Commanders in the field anticipated more than 100,000 casualties during our invasion of their main islands.
We had been carpet bombing their cities with Incendiary bombs causing massive fire-storms for weeks. Tens of thousands had already been killed.
The Atomic bomb was used to demonstrate to the Japanese the futility of continued resistance.
General MacArthur with the blessing of Truman as advised by the leading strategists in America, realized the importance of maintaining the Emperor as head of state. The Emperor was treated with the dignity his position required. He was never charged with any responsibility for war crimes even though he was clearly taking an active role in the war.
Report thisBy Billy Bob, August 8, 2007 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Er. uh, when will the Japanese, as a people and as a nation, show contrition for actions in China and Korea well before the incident at Pearl Harbor? When will the Japanese show contrition for their treatment of Occidental prisoners of war?
Sorry, Vern, but your premise does not compute.
Report thisBy Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
As early as 1943 Allied intelligence knew of the existence of the death camps such as Auschwitz, and there were proposals to send the US Army Air Force to bomb them and put the gas chambers out of commission, but the US government decided not to.
Do you call that saving Jews from the Nazis?
Sure, save the Jews by bombing them what grade are you in?
Report thisBy lilmamzer, August 8, 2007 at 1:05 pm Link to this comment
#93162 by Non Credo
Yes, but thats what Americans believe they did.
You claim to know what Americans believe. Typically fatuous remark.
Cite your sources.
Report thisBy lilmamzer, August 8, 2007 at 1:03 pm Link to this comment
#93164 by Bill Abernathy
No one could have stopped the slaughter of Europes Jews by Hitler except by first ending the war. So in that sense America helped stop the slaughter
That’s a stretch. By the time the war ended, the vast majority of Europe’s Jews had been murdered.
As early as 1943 Allied intelligence knew of the existence of the death camps such as Auschwitz, and there were proposals to send the US Army Air Force to bomb them and put the gas chambers out of commission, but the US government decided not to.
Report thisDo you call that saving Jews from the Nazis?
By Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
#93156 by lilmamzer on 8/08 at 11:48 am
No one could have stopped the slaughter of Europes Jews by Hitler except by first ending the war. So in that sense America helped stop the slaughter
Report thisBy Erica, August 8, 2007 at 12:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Terrorism has been plaguing our world for ages now and it’s time we put a stop to it. According to the Borgen Project, 78% of Americans agree that fighting poverty is an effective way of fighting terrorism. Yet we remove ourselves from contributing to humanitarian causes and fund multi-billion dollar wars.
Report thisBy Roscoe, August 8, 2007 at 12:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Sheer” idiocy.
World War II was a terrible war, and the people of the United States were sick of it. With two nuclear strikes, the surpise application of overwhelming, murderous force, the infuriated U.S. people ended that war while incurring few additional casualties.
That’s how victors end wars.
By way of contrast, the Iraqi terrorist attacks end nothing but lives.
And as for the Japanese lives lost at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, now we can afford to feel the pity for the dead and wounded we couldn’t afford in 1945.
“War’s don’t decide who’s right—only who’s left.” Don’t know who said that, but truer, more pathetic words were never spoken.
Report thisBy lilmamzer, August 8, 2007 at 11:48 am Link to this comment
#93101 by Frikken Kids
If you honestly think that saving the Jews was the major reason for America entering WWII then you truly are a fool.
It took you this long to figure that out?
===================
I hope you would admit that America did significantly more in WWII than save the Jews.
The US hardly did anything to prevent the slaughter of Europe’s Jews. A few camps were liberated very late in the war by US soldiers, but this was mostly a consequence of being there anyway on the way to crushing Germany, not as a matter of policy. To suggest that the US “saved the Jews” from the Nazis is absurd.
Report thisBy Nancy, August 8, 2007 at 11:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
To Bill Abernathy,
More than one million Iraqi civilians have been killed as a direct result of the illegal invasion of Iraq—a war based on lies for the purposes of setting up permanent military bases in the Middle East (after Saudi Arabia asked us to leave)securing Iraqi oil. The initial “shock and awe” campaign killed many thousands of civilians instantly. If that’s not terrorism, if war is not terrorism on civilian populations, I don’t know what else anyone could call it. War is terrorism, Bill.
Report thisBy 1drees, August 8, 2007 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Americans do ( silently) pride themselves as the great Warrior Nation, I mean look at the last 40 years & you will see 10 nations or people attacked. it is a Warrior Agenda of the Zionist Jews that you
Report this“goyims” are under, see “Protocols of ZION”. Maybe you Goyims should start doing what the jews do to get things done in USA.
Maybe you people should circulate the News & the phone numbers to call in the days you goyims are running the campaign for the delivery of your message to the congress. and then assign people to remind others to make calls, all this requires organisation BUT your GOVT might not let you all Organise at all, coz the confiscation of iraq war opposer’s
Property has been signed already.
THE US congress number and the instruction to call congress for flow of funds to Israel is always posted in some jewish papers and then there are people who call others on the phone to get them to make the call
and so that they do not forget. SEE how they insist on being heard while you Goyims just been living FREE fine & dandy in lalaland & your tax dollars been paying for tremendous losses to the other people eg
Palestinians, Pamanans, Nicraguans, etc etc & OF course the jews & the Israelis love you for that but they might not love you too much for that only.
Other Than that, unless Americans Steer away from the WW3, we all will be soon there. And in Wars there are always surprises and upsets coz barely ever any plan goes as per plan, iraq & vietnam are best
examples, the army presumed the the resistance to roll over & play dead. Most of the world couldnt care less about Americans BUT its the Death & Destruction that you export that everyone abhors and wants to
avoid.
America the Great land of ................ whatever, you bet, as long as you can stay away from killing and funding other people’s death. which in the the present situation is impossible as even the new
hopeful candidates are trying to feed the WAR HUNGRY by promising wars here And there. really astounding to hear when i thought that the nation was sick of wars & plundering. People couldnt care less BUT the
USA future is , of course, very WARRY in the next few years too UNLESS some people actually do try and cause a change or it will be observed once again the “the good ol USofA” has Massacred another few millions.
US Forces have used all possible ILLEGAL WEAPONS in iraq BUT still are very limited in iraq, so that does mean that your technical superiority in death machines has been not much of a help, no matter how many you have killed so far, but you still managed to kill a little extra whose relatives take your soldiers out 1 by 1, maybe your bombings killed
complete blocks but these insurgents are so far quiet patient as were the vietnamese or indian Indians or other people who ever tried to resist occupation and/or imperialism. The American Indians tried their
best but they evidently failed & the native could only complain of ” White man speaks with forked tongue” ( translation the newcomming white
boys lie like hell & their word is worth ZILCH, sounds exactly like a typical American president except JFK)
By Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 10:12 am Link to this comment
#93142 by Charity on 8/08 at 9:57 am
Report thisCharity, if we extend that logic out America would have used the Big Bomb on Germany and saved a lot more lives that it lost to Japan.
By Charity, August 8, 2007 at 9:57 am Link to this comment
The comments I’ve read seem to be missing the points Mr. Scheer made in the first couple of paragraphs of this article. The comparison of targeting schoolchildren in Iraq and schoolchildren in Japan really got my attention. I think the nub is the America-centric view that the U.S. is and always has been and will be in the right, no matter who else in the world suffers. American lives are more precious and American causes morally correct. I know I was raised to believe just that, but getting older and becoming a grandmother and having the advantage of living outside the U.S. for the past 18 years has broadened my views considerably. I believe this article is pointing out the lengths to which the American people and those who govern have gone, and will go, to “defend” themselves. If Harry Truman felt civilian targets were justified in the larger purpose of shortening a war and saving the more valuable American lives, how is it that a similar point of view held by any group involved in conflict in Iraq is not similarly justified? Targeting civilians is targeting civilians, whenever and wherever. And soul-searching is a valuable exercise, because it opens up thought processes that have been molded by others. I can’t take responsibility for decisions made by my grandparents’ generation, but I can learn from articles like this one and be responsible in what I pass on to my children and theirs. We have to be informed and accept our history, all of it, to do better in the future.
Report thisBy writerdd, August 8, 2007 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I can’t believe that commentors are condoning the use of nuclear weapons against civilians for any reason whatsoever. God, you people make me puke.
Report thisBy Tim, August 8, 2007 at 9:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
On Comment #93120 by Scott: They claimed they only had six bombs, and didn’t want to waste any on a demonstration dropping. They also targeted Hiroshima because it had a military base, but dropped the bomb on the center of the city. Also, they dropped it at 8:15 in the morning, when many people were still outside on their way to work and school.
Report thisBy Andrew, August 8, 2007 at 9:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
On the anniversary of the Hiroshima Atomic Bombing, I always think about the multiple bayoneting and raping of Chinese civilians by the Japanese in Nanking, the Bataan Death March where thousands of American and Filipino POWs were summarily beheaded and perished, the summary seizure and execution of the entire French Colonial Administration in Hanoi (including civilians) on 9 March 1945, and the seizure of “comfort women” by the Japanese - all voluntarily aggressive acts against noncombatants which Japan has expunged from its’ collective memory, still has not apologized for, or financially compensated the victims.
The Mayor of Hiroshima seems to forget to ask the central question of why the atomic bombing occurred.
Linking the atomic bombing to Iraq is tantamount to juxtaposing incongruencies - it is simply irrelevant to WW2 as a whole, or to Iraq.
Before criticising this unfortunate act of war, it might also be helpful to compare the loss of life of the bombings with that of the alternate options - such as Gen Curtis LeMay’s fire-bombings of Tokyo, or the invasions of mainland Japan in Operations “Coronet” and “Olympic” (remembering the mass suicides of Japanese civilians in Saipan upon US occupation of the island).
Likewise, Iraq can be criticised on its’ own merits without such sloppy comparisons.
By the way the bomb hit Hiroshima on August 6, not April 6.
Report thisBy Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 9:34 am Link to this comment
#93087 by Non Credo on 8/08 at 4:59 am
The only connection between Israel, and, America and the war with Japan is that that both Israel and America defended themselves against all odds.
Report thisBy Bill Abernathy, August 8, 2007 at 9:09 am Link to this comment
I cant help but question the motive of Robert Scheer to frame the 62nd anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima with the war in Iraq when death is the only thing they have in common. One comment though is very telling Of course, we had our justifications, as terrorists always do. .Thats it, he simply wants to paint his own neighbors as being TERRORIST.
Report thisBy Elder R E Kelly, August 8, 2007 at 9:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I find the comparison between terrorist and an act of war as a liberal bias. It sadden me to see mans reasoning against a government who according to the laws of God are to execute judgement against evil doers. This includes all who are under the authority of the evil leaders, who in the case of Japan would have preferred to die than surrender.
If I must choose between the deaths of those who walk justly or the evil doer…Well duh! I would have done what President Truman did.
Report thisBy 127001, August 8, 2007 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
The self-righteous are always the ones who point fingers at others. As an American, I have found myself despising the current administration and the society itself. The generations after WWII didn’t learn. They became complacent and apathetic. Self-delusion looking in a mirror is “more comfortable” than seeing reality out the window.
Ultimately, what this country “gets” is what it ultimately deserves. But betcha the whining about it starts even before reality does hit.
Report thisBy 1drees, August 8, 2007 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Americans do ( silently) pride themselves as the great Warrior Nation, I mean look at the last 40 years & you will see 10 nations or people attacked. it is a Warrior Agenda of the Zionist Jews that you “goyims” are under, see “Protocols of ZION”. Maybe you Goyims should start doing what the jews do to get things done in USA.
Report thisMaybe you people should circulate the News & the phone numbers to call in the days you goyims are running the campaign for the delivery of your message to the congress. and then assign people to remind others to make calls, all this requires organisation BUT your GOVT might not let you all Organise at all, coz the confiscation of iraq war opposer’s Property has been signed already.
THE US congress number and the instruction to call congress for flow of funds to Israel is always posted in some jewish papers and then there are people who call others on the phone to get them to make the call and so that they do not forget. SEE how they insist on being heard while you Goyims just been living FREE fine & dandy in lalaland & your tax dollars been paying for tremendous losses to the other people eg Palestinians, Pamanans, Nicraguans, etc etc & OF course the jews & the Israelis love you for that but they might not love you too much for that only.
Other Than that, unless Americans Steer away from the WW3, we all will be soon there. And in Wars there are always surprises and upsets coz barely ever any plan goes as per plan, iraq & vietnam are best examples, the army presumed the the resistance to roll over & play dead. Most of the world couldnt care less about Americans BUT its the Death & Destruction that you export that everyone abhors and wants to avoid.
America, the Great land of ................ whatever, you bet, as long as you can stay away from killing and funding other people’s death. which in the the present situation is impossible as even the new hopeful candidates are trying to feed the WAR HUNGRY by promising wars here And there. really astounding to hear when i thought that the nation was sick of wars & plundering. People couldnt care less BUT the USA future is , of course, very WARRY in the next few years too UNLESS some people actually do try and cause a change it will be observed once again the “the good ol USofA” has Massacred another few millions.
US Forces have used all possible ILLEGAL WEAPONS in iraq BUT still are very limited in iraq, so that does mean that your technical superiority in death machines has been not much of a help, no matter how many you have killed so far, but you still managed to kill a little extra whose relatives take your soldiers out 1 by 1, maybe your bombings killed complete blocks but these insurgents are so far quiet patient as were the vietnamese or indian Indians or other people who ever tried to resist occupation and/or imperialism. The American Indians tried their best but they evidently failed & the native could only complain of ” White man speaks with forked tongue” ( translation the newcomming white boys lie like hell & their word is worth ZILCH, sounds exactly like a typical American president except JFK)
By Scott, August 8, 2007 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
It seems reasonable to think that detonating a nuke or two on empty ground within sight of the Japanese commanders might have sufficed to hasten their surrender.
Instead he chose an indiscriminate bombing of a civilian population. It was a bad decision then and it will always remain a bad decision.
Report thisBy Crimson Ghost, August 8, 2007 at 7:15 am Link to this comment
The atomic bombing of Japan has often been cited as “payback” for the attack on Pearl Harbor.
But one crucial fact that is rarely mentioned by those trying to excuse this atrocity is that almost all of the 3000 or so American killed at Pearl Harbor were MILITARY personnel. BUT as we all know most of the 300,000 or so JAPANESE killed by the atomic bombs were CIVILIANS.
Too the US today is openly contemplating a Pearl Harbor type surprise attack on Iran. Apparently a sneak attack is the OK when we do but horrendous if somebody does it to us.
Talk about HYPOCRISY.
Report thisBy anonymous, August 8, 2007 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
let’s not compare somebody who started a war with somebody who ended one
Report thisBy Frikken Kids, August 8, 2007 at 6:26 am Link to this comment
Congratulations, Non Credo. I never would have thought that this essay could cause somebody to post a comment about Israel.
While I’m not great fan of Israel (I find many actions of the Israeli state to be reprehensible), I hope you would admit that America did significantly more in WWII than save the Jews. They helped the Allies stop the spread of Nazi fascism that had devoured most of Europe and could have taken over the world. If you honestly think that saving the Jews was the major reason for America entering WWII then you truly are a fool.
Report thisBy One Little Victory, August 8, 2007 at 6:22 am Link to this comment
I normally like Robert’s articles, but this one is irresponsible. The attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were NOT a “terror plot”. I will remind Mr. Scheer that the United States of America was blatantly attacked by another foreign power, intent - along with Germany - on bringing our nation to its knees. The terrorists of World War Two were to be round in Berlin, Rome and Tokyo, not in Washington.
This is not the TRUTH that Truthdig is known for. I am deeply disappointed.
Report thisBy Howard, August 8, 2007 at 6:03 am Link to this comment
The fighting was NOT over, at Japan’s doorstep, but that is the point, the fighting was just about to begin. Japan was not going to surrender and cost of fighting to get through the islands from Bataan thru Iwo Jima was exceptionally high. And with an invasion of Japan that was scheduled estimate was even higher for American soldiers.
Report thisAnd now to see someone equating in a comment below that bombing Japan at that time is a key to Americas obsesson with Israel is beyond rational comprehension. In other words, ’ idiotic’ !
By Erik H, August 8, 2007 at 5:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If any of you ever have the chance, I highly recommend going to Hiroshima. For me, any lingering arguments for dropping the bomb were dispelled after visiting the city. See it for yourself, and then decide whether you can justify the bomb. I cannot.
Report thisBy Marnie, August 8, 2007 at 5:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Interesting that the, children being outside and exposed, approach to terror, that we now condemn, is also the one used in Waco against Mt Carmel. What actually happened there is that, due to bad intelligence, they were trapped underground. If the plan was to terrorize the adults into surrendering after they had seen their children mowed down, or to draw the adults into the way of automatic fire in a effort to save or protect their children, the result was that they fought to their deaths to defend them.
And please lets not forget the firebombing of the non military target of Heidelberg, Germany. It was a pure act of cruelty that we supported
If the point of these acts of cruelty was to warn the world against attacking us in the future, then why does not Congress use the same warning by using impeachment and criminal prosecutions against the Bushies as a warning to future wannabe dictators??
Thank you for mentioning that Eisenhower did not think the A-bombing was necessary, I have always believed it was a political CYA for pouring 1 Billion plus 1940’s dollars into the project. That expenditure would have to be justified after the war ended, so the bombs had to be used somewhere. And the Military so loves to try out its new killing toys on people who cant defend themselves. Just so much collateral damage.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, August 8, 2007 at 5:08 am Link to this comment
#93076 by Howard on 8/08 at 4:16 am: “...Or Revisionism of a majory happening. ....Any American soldier who was in WW II that I’ve talked to besides my 3 uncles were quite in favor of ending the war. .....Japan was an inplacable enemy and an invasion of Japan was otherwise most certain. With a pretty steep cost….”
Uhh, what’s wrong with digginging into what really happened instead of merely what we were all told by those in control? This is the “Truth - dig” after all….
I’m sure that everyone was “in favor of ending the war” (except the industrial armaments complex) but the US/Allies were already almost at Japan’s door then. Most of the fighting was already done.
The dropping of the A-bombs was the dawn of a new era more so than the end of a war. That then led straight into the US invasion and occupation of Korea (no, it was not the UN - that was just a front). You can’t blame that war on Japan.
Report thisBy Old Rick, August 8, 2007 at 4:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hiroshima Day is NOT April 6, 1945. Think. Proof-read. Edit. We dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima on AUGUST 6, 1945. And you know how important details are…. Sigh….
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, August 8, 2007 at 4:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr Scheer winners writehistory.You could add to the acts of terrorism by the United States and Britain the bombing of Dresden.Even if all the people who say it ended the war more quickly are correct it is still considered terrorism when you attack civilian populations to effect a change by a government.Of course the back end to my first statement is that history is lies agreed upon.
Report thisBy Howard, August 8, 2007 at 4:16 am Link to this comment
Monday morning quaterbacking, indeed ! Or Revisionism of a majory happening. Any American soldier who was in WW II that I’ve talked to besides my 3 uncles were quite in favor of ending the war. Japan was an inplacable enemy and an invasion of Japan was otherwise most certain. With a pretty steep cost.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, August 8, 2007 at 2:09 am Link to this comment
Quote: “...Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japan’s decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base .......The target preferred by U.S. atomic scientists—a patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrain—was rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic….”
Sounds rather like “shock and awe”, doesn’t it? That underlines the intention at that time to send a ‘message’ to China and Russia (the USSR) then. Just like the USA was sending a ‘message’ to China and Russia when Baghdad was bombed for a second time at the outset of the hypocritically-named “Operation Iraqi Freedom” in 2003 (its in US military documents).
That followed a decade of murderous sanctions and blockades by the USA which resulted in death by starvation and disease of millions of Iraqis. No doubt the idea is still to dramatise the power of the USA to dominate those who would disagree witht heir doctrines or imparatives. The real reason for invading Iraq was the refusal of Saddam to accept $US for Iraqi oil…!!!
By the way, the bombing of Hiroshima was on the 6th August 1945 and Nagasaki’s commemoration is tomorrow. Better late than never, eh, Scheer? You’ve only taken 12 months since I first mentioned this…... http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/3708/
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, August 8, 2007 at 1:47 am Link to this comment
That was the result of an A-bomb not even the size of the warheads on those missiles carried on board US and British nuclear submarines (100 kiloton). That is what the USA intends to use against Iran if such stupidity is permitted by Americans!
It will be as unnecessary as the attacks on Japan and just as inexcusable if that does happen. Bombing people and countries seems to have become some sort of bizare mindset for Americans since the 1940’s. Crazy!
Then there are the H-bombs .......a veritable evil “sword of Damocles” hanging over everybody’s heads around the world since 1950! Which country still has the most of these murder weapons???
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2