LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 11, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

House Passes Health Care Bill

Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Afghanistan's Sham Army

Saddam Biography Makes a Splash in Baghdad

On Reflection, Pigs Are Smart

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * When a Time Bomb Is Ticking

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Kingmakers: The Invention of the Modern Middle East

Kingmakers: The Invention of the Modern Middle East

By Karl E. Meyer and Shareen Blair Brysac
$18.45

Dog Woman

Dog Woman

By Chris Abani
$14.20

more items

 
Reports

The Unflappable Speaker

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 2, 2007

By Marie Cocco

WASHINGTON—Nancy Pelosi doesn’t have the demeanor of someone who leads a Congress suffering from the worst public disapproval in contemporary polling history. Its standing is about as low as the Nixonian depths reached recently by none other than President Bush—the man whose policies Democrats were elected to reverse, or at least check.

    With the president’s unrelenting personal intransigence and shrewd political gamesmanship among Republicans, it has begun to look— at least to some—that it’s the new Congress and not the same old White House that keeps the nation mired in Iraq and in other unacceptable policy impasses, foreign and domestic.

    Pelosi is unperturbed. This speaker of the House does not know to play defense or, more likely, she simply refuses to.

    At a breakfast with liberal journalists earlier this week, Pelosi outlined a domestic policy agenda so elegant in its symmetrical pursuit of both long-range change (an attack on global warming) and lunch-bucket progress (a bumper crop of “green collar jobs” to be created from investing in new energy technologies) that you begin to believe she is of a rare species among practiced Washington hands: That is, her political instincts come from somewhere well beyond the Beltway.

    “I gaveled that gavel down on behalf of the children and not the status quo,” she says, recalling the moment when she took the oath as the first woman speaker in history.

Advertisement

    She was, in this particular comment, explaining why she will go toe-to-toe over energy policy with Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., the longest-serving member of the House, an “old bull” of the Democratic Caucus—and the most vigorous defender of the automobile industry, which has opposed increasing energy-saving fuel-economy standards for three decades. But Pelosi also made clear her bristling could apply to any of the hidebound ways with which Washington—and even the House she has led since January—disposes of ideas it considers inconvenient.

    “Washington, D.C., is the city of the status quo,” Pelosi said of the town whose cloakroom intricacies she mastered during her 20-year climb to power. “For so many years, I would come from California, a very entrepreneurial state, where every time I met with my constituents, you’re meeting with a room full of dreamers. Dreamers with a plan to do something great for our country. ... You’d be all revved up when you come home, and then you’d go back to Washington and you hit a wall.”

    Pelosi now has the power to chisel at the wall. She unabashedly lists on her own website the 22 veto threats the White House has issued against a raft of bills the House already has passed, or is about to. The president’s targets include everything from routine spending bills to a far-reaching measure that would clean up the student loan industry, to legislation that gives the citizens of the District of Columbia a vote in Congress. 

    Pelosi’s agenda is undiminished. She believes that neither immigration reform nor any free-trade deals are likely to be approved without companion legislation to soothe the economic insecurity felt by millions of Americans. So she pledges measures on job creation and retraining. She relishes a fight with the Bush White House over expanding health insurance to cover more needy children, since it pits Republican efforts to spare the tobacco and managed-care industries against the Democrats’ determination to use money from tobacco taxes and reduced insurance-industry subsidies to cover kids. “Welcome to the discussion,” she says. “This will be a defining kind of debate for us.”

    But the defining issue that drove voters to oust Republicans from control of Capitol Hill last fall was Iraq. Having opposed the war from the start, she says she shares the frustration of those who are enraged that the Democrats have not yet stopped the carnage. Once Senate Republicans blocked measures to set timelines and political conditions for continuing the U.S. military presence, “we just plummeted” in public approval, Pelosi says.

    The next chance for political progress on the war comes in September, the due date for a military report on the effectiveness of the president’s troop surge. Pelosi expects the usual fudging: “I’m very concerned that they will kick the can further down the road, or talk about a few anecdotal successes that they’ll try to pass off as the (whole) situation in Iraq,” she says.

    Pelosi does not yet reveal a full-blown Democratic strategy for handling this, but it would seem to have one certain element. She will kick back.

    Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.


    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Impeaching Alberto Gonzales

Next item: Back to Basics



Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Viola, August 11, 2007 at 7:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I am pleased with what the Democrats want to do. They would be doing it if not for Bush’s Veto and the obstructionist republicans who will not allow anything to pass.  Republicans in the Senate are jackasses and don’t care at all about the military or anything else except making Bush look good and making Democrats look bad. The real truth is that the rubber stampers are showing how revolting they are and how little they care about America.

Report this

By GodSend, August 8, 2007 at 8:41 pm #

ardee:

The eloquence of your last post (Thank God!) is only exceeded by your ignorance and deception! smile

Report this

By ardee, August 8, 2007 at 8:52 am #

This is my last word to godsend before I erase him from my space, and thanks to Truthdig for this option.

You are an abysmal and false descriptor of christianity and the teachings of Christ. What you follow is more in line with the antichrist than He who preached love and tolerance. You are absolutely in league with the all fundamentalists everywhere, including the radical moslems variety. Take your hatreds and your unstable mental health and shove them up your sick and diseased ass.

Now goodbye to you you sicken me. On ignore.

Report this

By GodSend, August 7, 2007 at 11:48 pm #

ardee, your ‘Christian’ friends sound like a bunch of wimps and sheeple who don’t have the slightest idea what a follower of Christ is supposed to be like. Followers of Christ are to conduct spiritual warfare against all enemies of God and His Son - that includes worshipers of Satan (Zionists), atheists, agnostics and all others who do not acknowledge the deity of Christ (Jews, for example). When Paul (the apostle) said: “I fought the good fight”, he was referring to this spiritual warfare. Like Christ, he was persecuted and ultimately martyred (like most of Christ’s disciples). Why? Because “A servant is not greater than his Master. If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you”. You SEE!, ardee, true followers of Christ fight the fight of faith - they do not slink around quietly and smile lovingly at the Devil and his worshipers and say “Jesus loves you”. Followers of Christ have been given the sword of the Spirit (God’s Word) and they slay the enemies of God and His Son all day long! There is no time to ‘take a breath’ as long as ignoramuses like you expel meaningless garbage and try to deceive people.

The Devil and his horde of worshipers have to be RESISTED without stopping until they flee. smile “RESIST the Devil and he will flee from you”. Get it? (I doubt it).

If we had all resisted the Devil when we should have, Israel wouldn’t be sitting there with 400+ nukes and Bush wouldn’t be in the WH, racking his brains (what there is of them) to come up with some lame excuse to attack Iran (on behalf of Israel) and start WWIII.

Report this

By ardee, August 7, 2007 at 9:48 pm #

I know a few christians. My best fishing buddy and fishing guide are both christians, the guide refuses to work Sundays, instead goes to church and reads his bible. For a fishing guide refusing to work Sundays is tantamount to halving ones income, people book Saturday and Sunday so obviously go elsewhere…..He is still the absolute best guide on three rivers!

Neither of these gentle folks would dream of acting or reacting as does godsend. Neither is vindictive as is godsend. Neither engages in diatribes as does godsend. Neither, when faced with opposition to their closely held belief systems, engages in insult and innuendo however thinly veiled as does godsend.

I guess there are christians and those who hide from themselves behind a facade of religiousity. I believe Jesus once noted that one should hate the sin but love the sinner. So I loves ya’ godsend, but I really wish you’d shut the hell up about zionists, maybe just take a vacation or something, or at least a deep breath once in a while.

Report this

By GodSend, August 7, 2007 at 6:19 pm #

You are brilliant, Leefeller - I’m a Zionist shill! Spread the word and Lieberman and Olmert will love you (in addition to Bush, of course).

I’m already booked for dinner - but we can do lunch sometime - we can just sit around and call each other names wink What names do you like to be called?

Report this

By Leefeller, August 7, 2007 at 5:01 pm #

Godsend, stated

“You have NO IDEA What’s Really Happening and I was/am NOT soliciting your support. Pleasant dreams! wink”

I was actually replying to your inane comment above, love the way you place labels on anyone who does not agree with you.

Let’s see, either you are with us or against us. Boy! that sounds like someone I have heard before!

So I am a name caller Zionist excrement, and you Godsend said”’ You are a shoveler of lies, deception and diversion (Zionist excrement)

“You can’t just keep lying and think you’re fooling anybody. wink “

Wink, wink, your winks are quite cute, your anti Zionist message is so obnoxious, you actually provoke and elicit Zionist support. Of course that may be your real agenda.

For someone who uses the name of god, you actually seem full of hate, but hypocrisy seems to be in vogue.

Call me anything you want, but DON’T call me late for dinner.

Report this

By GodSend, August 7, 2007 at 1:41 pm #

Leefeller:

Here is your last post:

Godsend,

When you say you are all knowing the shoveler of the gospel and that others would never understand, because it is beyond their ability to reason, or way over their heads, I would say we already have the same closed minded mentality in the White House.

Quite the pretentiousness one, indeed.

Let’s have a closer look at what you wrote and discern who you are and what your agenda is!

I said that I am ‘all knowing’? Where did I say that? (I didn’t say that!)

‘shoveler of the gospel’ is disparaging to the Word of God and full of negative innuendo about me. It’s name-calling, thinly veiled, and baseless. My post to ardee did not reference the gospel!

‘others would never understand, because it is beyond their ability to reason’ I addressed ardee specifically and no one else. You just decided to misrepresent what I said and turned it into a blanket accusation against unnamed listeners.

we already have the same closed minded mentality in the White House Here you associate me with Bush, who indeed has a ‘closed minded mentality’, without any substantiation whatsoever. Those meaningless words are just more name-calling.

Nowhere did you address the content of my previous post, addressed to ardee, which prompted your post! The issue is Zionism and its threat to America and the world! (you simply ignored that).

What you are, Leefeller, is a name-calling and deceptive LIAR, in the tradition of Zionist Neocons.

You are a shoveler of lies, deception and diversion (Zionist excrement)!

You can’t just keep lying and think you’re fooling anybody. wink

Report this

By ardee, August 7, 2007 at 8:43 am #

Cyrena

Thanks for the kind words, I figured that if I got the ball rolling perhaps others might be inspired to notify this one note poster that her continual and almost deafening screeching about one minor and less important facet of our sick government is unwelcome and perhaps even distracting. I knew that I could never break through the shell of her psychosis so my words were really for the group as a whole.

As to the damn Democrats…I am a Libra, and sometimes simply must balance the scales of the conversation. When everyone is piling on I am inclined to take the road less travelled.

This recent vote, just before recess, on a bill unread and lacking the mandate for Congressional Oversight ( caps intended) sums it all up pretty well for me. Now Pelosi is saying, among others, that the bill needs to be revised , amended, revisited…I am so sick to my stomach at these cowards that I would almost rather read a godsend diatribe….almost.

Democrats need to use whatever means necesary to protect our nation from its Executive branch, but first it would seem they need to understand the peril. In fairness (that Libra stuff again) Obama, Clinton and Biden all voted NO on the bill…....

Report this

By cyrena, August 7, 2007 at 5:16 am #

#92311 by ardee on 8/05 at 7:46 am

Ardee,

I stand noted and advised on your point about the rules and all of the other real politick that is a part of any parliamentary political system. And, I honestly do understand that. There was in fact an excellent piece by Michael Ignatieff in the NYT magazine this week, that goes into some of the concerns in the real world, that must always include the reality of political concessions, and the rules…well, that too. 92311 by ardee on 8/05 at 7:46 am

Ardee, you’re right on the rules and all of the other real politick that is a part of any parliamentary political system. And, I honestly do understand that. There was in fact an excellent piece by Michael Ignatieff http://select.nytimes.com/preview/2007/08/05/magazine/1154683896827.html
in the NYT magazine this week.

So, I think what my problem with Nancy is, is best explained by another comment that I believe you made yourself, (regarding someone else): not a lack of intelligence, but a lack of judgment, and at this point in time, a refusal to assign duties and responsibilities that would make the entire procedure more effective. Still, I do understand the challenges. I just think she has failed to meet them, for many of the same reasons that we like to blame GW, for all of his stupidities. She’s not open to anything that anybody else has to say.

Which is why I’m not sure there is an answer to what you note in this comment:


•  But before the shoe of judgement drops remember that the Democrats had the same options for six long years and chose, for whatever stupid reasons, to not use them.

I’m not sure about the dems having these same options, before they held a majority. I would say that they certainly could have done the same sort of filibuster type stuff that the repugs have so excelled at, but thinking back over these last 7 or so years, (with the rules being pretty much the same) I’m not sure that they could have done a whole more than that. Not that I’m giving them a pass, since I think we should have prevented this judicial highjacking to begin with. But, if they could roll over Big Al, then I just don’t know what to think. I don’t know what the dems could have done then, but it didn’t happen, and it hasn’t since. So, they don’t get off the hook.

HOWEVER, I have to also say, that for the past 6 years, the house dems HAVE in fact been under this same forceful fist of Nancy. Anyone suggesting anything not part of her agenda, (within her OWN party) has been effectively steamrolled. Now, she wasn’t the “Speaker” then, but she was still a senior dowager of the House and the Democrats, and she pretty much kept them all on very short leashes. Didn’t want any “internal disagreements” among them. Well, just shutting somebody up doesn’t make them agree with you anymore than they already did, nor does it make their contributions any less valuable.
And, that has been Nancy’s way for a long time. So, while we certainly can’t “blame” her for the workings or intricacies of the system, we can sure find that she has used some exceedingly poor judgment on matters that concern more than just she and her base. In so doing, I think she’s done far more harm than good. But, I could certainly say the same about others.

Report this

By Leefeller, August 7, 2007 at 2:21 am #

Godsend,

When you say you are all knowing the shoveler of the gospel and that others would never understand, because it is beyond their ability to reason, or way over their heads,  I would say we already have the same closed minded mentality in the White House. 

Quite the pretentiousness one, indeed.

Report this

By GodSend, August 7, 2007 at 1:24 am #

ardee, here’s a suggestion : DO NOT COMMENT on my posts - they are way too boring for you! The reason they are so boring to you, is because they are WAY over your head. You don’t even know what a Zionist is! Let me give you a head start:

A Zionist is NOT Jewish. By Jewish I mean a true Torah Jew. Torah Jews (like Neturei Karta Jews) worship Yahweh. Zionists (who claim to be Jews) worship Satan. How can you tell them apart? Zionists commit crimes against humanity and against God. Here’s a Shortlist of their actions: They deceive, lie, murder, maim, torture, steal, bribe, blackmail, ‘accident’, ‘suicide’,  conduct ‘false-flag’ operations against America (USS Liberty, 9/11, etc.), commit genocide, incite hatred against goyim, Muslims, followers of Christ, etc. etc. etc. Their actions are truly devilish - what did you expect?!

Zionists are fanatical supporters of the rogue State of Israel. Investigate some UN resolutions against Israel to get a better handle on ‘rogue’. They developed nuclear weapons at Dimona and concealed that from the UN and the world (check out Mordecai Vanunu). They run a scam called the ‘Holocaust Industry’ (check Norman Finkelstein’s book about this). They infiltrate foreign governments (espionage) and ‘entice’ them to fight their wars for them and send them oodles of $$$ so they can build up their military to kill off their neighbors. America is their all-time favorite target. They infiltrate political parties with their stooges and bribe them with $$$ to help them get ‘elected’ - by hook or by crook. Etc. etc. etc.

They just LOVE to get their bloody hands on the MSM to propagate their deception and lies. They learned a lot of this stuff from the Nazis, especially Hitler and Goebbels. They want to turn America into a Fascist State through their stooge, Dubya. They’re almost there!

I bet you’re getting bored, huh!? Like I said, it’s WAY over your head. wink Go back to sleep!

Report this

By cyrena, August 6, 2007 at 10:24 pm #

•  #92653 by ardee on 8/06 at 5:25 pm
It is long past time that you or someone who cares for you takes action to begin a course of therapy. You are an obsessive on this subject, and worst of all, batshit crazy or not, you are so very very out of balance and your views are as well. Also, and perhaps worst of all, you are so very very boring.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh Ardee,
You’ve made my day with the above post. (sorry I still haven’t been able to get the formats for bolding and italics to work for me, so occasionally, I’ll have to continue to rely on the caps) So, in caps, this made my day!!!

I figured someone would eventually get around to confronting Godsend, but coming from you was all that much better. I love the batshit crazy part. Sometimes, it’s the only way to get the point across. And you’re right, I suspect that we might all be fed up with the Zionist propaganda, which is little more than a distraction to anything else that we need to pay attention to.

Thanks.

Report this

By ardee, August 6, 2007 at 9:25 pm #

#92557 by GodSend on 8/06 at 9:58 am
(242 comments total)

Hey, ardee, the ‘imaginary foe’ has cost around 3000 people their lives on 9/11, around 3000 more Americans their lives in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis their lives, millions of Iraqis their homes in Iraq and untold thousands of Arabs their lives, homes and children (not to mention their future) in Israel-occupied Palestine.


Hey godsend, you are quite insane you know, oh right you dont know, a symptom of insanity unfortunately. Most sane folks know that there was nary a zionist on either of the flights hijacked and used as weapons against the towers. About fifteen Saudis if memory serves, a couple or three Pakistanis, a Turk, or about that number participated in the hijacking of the four aircraft, no Israelis, no AIPAC folks.

As to the Americans and Iraqis murdered in Iraq, well that would be George W. who takes the blame there, again, he doesnt look jewish to me.

It is long past time that you or someone who cares for you takes action to begin a course of therapy. You are an obsessive on this subject, and worst of all, batshit crazy or not, you are so very very out of balance and your views are as well. Also, and perhaps worst of all, you are so very very boring.

Report this

By GodSend, August 6, 2007 at 3:23 pm #

Anyone who wants to find out more about ardee’s ‘imaginary foe’ should read the article “Dov Zakheim and the Missing Trillions” and the Comments at the following link:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11748146&postID=3675428608179558916

The main site is:

http://smokingmirrors.blogspot.com/

ALL the articles on that Blog are worth reading!

Report this

By GodSend, August 6, 2007 at 1:58 pm #

Hey, ardee, the ‘imaginary foe’ has cost around 3000 people their lives on 9/11, around 3000 more Americans their lives in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis their lives, millions of Iraqis their homes in Iraq and untold thousands of Arabs their lives, homes and children (not to mention their future) in Israel-occupied Palestine. They have unleashed rivers of blood and tears. They aim to open the spigots some more. They have caused our Constitution to be wrecked. They have caused our liberties to be curtailed. They have caused our privacy to be invaded. They have caused huge segments of our population to be stripped of their jobs, homes, wealth and morality. They are not satisfied with that. They want to cause more destruction and mayhem. THEY MUST BE STOPPED!

‘Imaginary’? Ask all those who died, were maimed and are suffering if this foe is imaginary!

When you become a victim of this ‘imaginary foe’, come back here and repeat that statement! wink

Report this

By GodSend, August 6, 2007 at 1:43 pm #

farmertx:

You’re right - sort of. Yes, God has everything under control BUT He expects His creatures (us) to use the brains with which He blessed us (more or less) wink to discern right from wrong and good from evil and ACT accordingly. Accordingly means as instructed by His commandments and those of His Son (Jesus the Christ).

So you can’t just sit around and just WAIT. You need to WATCH, THINK, PRAY for guidance - and then DO the ‘right thing’ - Just DO it! wink Notice the difference?

Report this

By Mariam Russell, August 6, 2007 at 12:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Go, Cindy!

Report this

By farmertx, August 6, 2007 at 11:10 am #

Godsend
Even better if God has it under control. So why worry? We can’t, least I ain’t a gonna try to, change Gods’ plans. So you can relax, right?

Report this

By ardee, August 6, 2007 at 8:51 am #

I believe it was Voltaire who noted that:

“If they can convince you of absurdities they can coerce you into atrocities.”

It is but a small step from the neurotic to the psychotic. I can see , and very well, that all this crap from the religious far right ends up with a new holocaust against Jews. All this talk of the undue influence of these wretched ‘Zionists’ purported to be infesting our halls of Congress and even the Oval Office perhaps is simply a new and more polite form of antisemitism.

I appreciate the fact that so many here see clearly that AIPAC is just another lobby, one that should be curtailed of course, one that pushes for an incorrect and harmful foreign policy to be sure, but one no more or less ‘evil’ than the pharmaceutical lobby, the National Association of Manufacturers or the Farm Lobby either.

I have already spent far too much time on someone elses delusions or perhaps worse, distractions from the real work at hand. There are, of course, really good folks who practice christianity, who try to adhere to the teachings of Jesus, a figure who spent his earthly time amidst the poor, the enslaved, who did no harm and urged only good. It is unfortunate that our resident right wing religionist is not among them.

No person with a clear mind can possibly condone or even understand this obsessive and obviously disturbed persons continual rants against this imagined foe. I suggest that we give him our sympathy, hope he seeks a mental health professional and overcomes this neurosis before it worsens and we read about him in a newspaper headline.

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 9:29 pm #

farmertx:

You misunderstand. I don’t have ‘it’ under control - God has ‘it’ under control! smile You have heard of God, I take it? (that’s a rhetorical question - no reply necessary)

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 9:26 pm #

Leefeller:

Notice that I supported your surface comments with the caveat that they are ONLY surface comments. You have NO IDEA What’s Really Happening and I was/am NOT soliciting your support. Pleasant dreams! wink

Report this

By cyrena, August 5, 2007 at 9:01 pm #

#92331 by farmertx on 8/05 at 9:57 am
•  #92313 by ardee on 8/05 at 9:56 am
Amen !
We’ve heard since before War II that the Zionist’s were taking over. Must be pretty disorganized if they haven’t accomplished it by now.

      Undue influence, yes, no argument there. Is it detrimental to the US? Maybe,
      in a way.

      Regardless, Zionist’s will be the least of our concerns if Shrub and Co aren’t stopped and soon.             
+++++++++++++++++
Farmertx & Ardee,

Another Amen.  I actually see a far greater danger (even than Zionism), for everyday that the Shrub and his master stay in charge at our House.

This thing with giving him unlimited spying powers now, is like, I dunno. Is it really too late? I mean, is this the final straw breaking down the last camel into a total paraplegic?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/080407Z.shtml

The really scariest part of it all, is this overwhelming URGENCY that they’ve attached to getting these spying powers granted to him. In effect, the Shrub told them they couldn’t go home/leave for their break, until they signed over these expanded powers to spy on Americans, claiming that—if we are attacked during the next month—- it’ll be their fault for not giving over these expanded powers to allegedly spy on al-Qaeda, this same damn invisible enemy that we’ve been allegedly chasing for 6 years, and the only thing we’ve caught is a whole bunch of misery, in addition to being lumped in with them. So, they chase invisible terrorists (by spying on us) and they “catch” – WHO? Generally, -US- is who they “catch”. We haven’t caught a real terrorist – YET!!

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/080307C.shtml

Report this

By farmertx, August 5, 2007 at 8:38 pm #

Godsend
Sounds like you have it under control, so I won’t worry. Have a great one.

Report this

By Leefeller, August 5, 2007 at 8:07 pm #

Godsend,
Thanks for reading my morning rant, but I would like to make it clear that the zionists are just one of many special interests lobbying the idiots in Washington.  Your obsession is definitely not mine.  Just follow the money. 

My suspicions are that we would part company after agreeing that Washington is a horn of plenty for special interests, big business and religion.  Opportunism takes many forms and I do not like any of them.

Your posts defy reaion and thought seems to be after even bigioted.  You seem to be missing the whole picture.  Your credit the zionists where credit is not due.

Fifty years ago you would have been focusing on the Communitsts with the same fortitude.

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 2:37 pm #

Do these posts have anything to do with Nancy Pelosi’s unflappability? You betcha! She’s a Zionist, after all! wink Why would a Zionist want to impeach another Zionist? No wonder Impeachment is ‘off the table’ - it always was (and will be) ‘off the table’ for any Zionist! And then there are ‘pardons’ and ‘commutations’, if push should come to shove - oy veh! wink

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 2:29 pm #

There is NO GREATER issue in our time than EXPOSING the perpetrators of 9/11! It is the tip of the iceberg of America’s nightmare.

There is NOTHING worth discussing until that question is answered for the world to SEE!

All hell will break loose when that finally happens. America’s collective consciousness will precede MSM acknowledgment of ‘WHO DID IT’.

HINT: Zionists (Israeli and American) had A LOT to do with it! wink

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 2:10 pm #

Hey, farmertx, I know life is rough on the farm out there and the sun burns hot BUT Bush & Co ARE Zionists!

Bush & Co are only the Zionists-of-the-day (in power). Once they go, there are plenty more (in all political parties) being groomed, bribed, cajoled or blackmailed by Israel’s Zionist leaders and the Israel Lobby to fill their shoes. Some of them are enthusiastic Zionists in their own right. smile

You sound like you enjoy being fooled - again and again and again! wink Either that or you’re just another Zionist ‘plant’. Not that clever, either!

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 2:00 pm #

ardee et al:

SEE! Leefeller’s latest post - it’s a very good surface-level description of what’s wrong with America - and, to some extent, the world!

What’s below the surface? You have to go down the rabbit hole to find out! It’s at:

http://novalight.org

Your pitiful attempt to sound ‘rational’ is a DENIAL of what is the Root of Evil. The Root of Evil is Satan, who is the ‘god of this world’, to use the description that Jesus the Christ used. He is also called ‘The Great Deceiver’. Have you noticed any DECEPTION lately in our government and country? Do you realize that the Israel/Mossad motto is ‘By DECEPTION we shall wage war’? Have you heard of ‘false-flag’ Ops? Israel’s leaders are bloodthirsty and murderous (Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Americans, etc.) Zionists and they have collaborated with their Zionists ‘plants’ (sayanim) in America to DESTROY our country, NOTHING LESS!

America and the world are NOT as they seem - and like the Zionist-controlled MSM (now including the WSJ) and blind fools like you would have Americans believe! Zionism is Nazism (Fascism) and it’s in the air right here in Thomas Jefferson’s America! It’s time to “water the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants and patriots” - plenty of tyrants and traitors everywhere!

Are Zionists ‘under every bed’ and in control of every government?

NOT YET - but their aim is to create a ‘Greater Israel’ in the ME (Balkanization) and New World Order. Their 1st order of business is to manufacture the ‘Grand Depression’ - already in progress. Thank Alan Greenspan (Zionist) and Bill Bernanke (Zionist) for that!

Americans won’t be fooled again! Not by you and the likes of you, not by the MSM and not by the ‘Decider’ (Great Deceiver) or all the little (Zionist) deceivers - like Pelosi, Clinton, Barack, McCain and Lieberman, either! wink

Read Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 and 1974 speeches about the Zionist threat facing America (and the world). Freedman was an ‘insider’ who knew! Vanunu followed in his footsteps. smile

Report this

By farmertx, August 5, 2007 at 1:57 pm #

#92313 by ardee on 8/05 at 9:56 am

Amen
We’ve heard since before War II that the Zionist’s were taking over. Must be pretty disorganized if they haven’t accomplished it by now.
Undue influence, yes, no argument there. Is it detrimental to the US? Maybe, in a way.
Regardless, Zionist’s will be the least of our concerns if Shrub and Co aren’t stopped and soon.

Report this

By Leefeller, August 5, 2007 at 12:04 pm #

Morning Rant

Between a choice of Zionists, neocons, liberals,  socialists, communists, the religious right we get stuck with a White House. 

A White House full of neocons, fascists of the first order, accumulators of the mighty dollar and worshipers of their God, the constant lie. Sounds like we have a King.

Congress relinquished some of our rights and Liberties to the White House in the name of terror, we were duped, but were they?  Are we doomed to watch the destruction of our founding fathers great democrat experiment? 

Those of us who see and feel this, are tree frogs croaking in the dark, croaking for sanity.  instead we find nothing but political clones, foxs in the chicken house.

Report this

By ardee, August 5, 2007 at 11:56 am #

#92273 by GodSend on 8/05 at 12:29 am

Look, I generally skip your posts, not because you lack intellect, but because you lack judgement. You allow your deeply held religious beliefs to color your political opinions. That is a bad thing for a democracy in which all faiths and lacks of faith are accepted and merge into a governance.

It is this religiosity that forces you to see a single evil and a single solution to our numerous problems. It is this continual drum beat of Zionists under every bed that turn me off. Are there those who might be characterised as such? Certainly. Does Israel wield far too much power vis a vis the AIPAC lobby on our foreign policies? Probably. Should we change our policies towards Israel and the entire Middle East? Definitely. Do Zionists run our nation, run world commerce, run every government including our own? Absolutely and definitively NOT!

Of course you will dismiss my words as every radical rejects anything that deviates from h/her deep convictions, but that, Godspeak, is your problem not ours here. This constant and rather sophomorically shallow rant of yours actually is a detriment to a discussion of how to progress,and leads nowhere as it is based upon a small truth packaged in a giant lie.

Report this

By ardee, August 5, 2007 at 11:46 am #

cyrena
I would not dismiss everything that SEQUOIABIS (darn thats a toughie) notes in his somewhat slavish praise of Pelosi. Obviously I disagree strongly with his “she is powerless to do better” defense, and I know, as do you, that the nation deserves much better, especially from a supposed liberal.

However his defense does contain the germ of truth in that business in the House is difficult enough with the numerous and confusing rules and customs. I believe Pelosi’s rule differs from those of her immediate predecessors in that she is, so far, unwilling to abrogate those rules as did they in order to get legislation through or stifle it.

She does have the power to stop the nonesense of the GOP, allowing them to filibuster things that a majority of America wants to see, yet she does not, puzzling. She is setting herself and her party up for a great fall in the coming election in my opinion. The Rovian machine is poised to attack the Democratic Congress for its do nothing term, despite the fact that it is the GOP who forces the inaction. But before the shoe of judgement drops remember that the Democrats had the same options for six long years and chose, for whatever stupid reasons, to not use them.

Report this

By GodSend, August 5, 2007 at 4:29 am #

The Zionists aren’t ‘under every bed’. They are, in fact, firmly embedded in the Democratic and Republican parties, Congress, the WH and the rest of the Gov’t apparatus - including the Fed, Pentagon, Justice, etc. Did I mention the MSM and Hollywood?

The Zionists are SO embedded in America that they are just about in bed with every decision maker of any consequence - including, of course, the ‘Decider’ himself! Guess what all those embedded Zionists are doing in all those beds? Can you say F…ing America? You betcha!

Some wishes will NEVER come true wink

Report this

By cyrena, August 5, 2007 at 1:38 am #

#92219 by ardee on 8/04 at 5:52 pm

Ardee, Thanks so much for posting this information that I should have known, but admittedly didn’t, and hadn’t gotten around to checking it out. You did, and so I thank you!

So, SOMEBODY elected her, and she’s got all of this damn power, and she won’t use it. BECAUSE, it’s all about the political expediency, and the fact that she’s decided, (in her own words) that “impeachment” isn’t “worth it”.

Of course my question would be, -isn’t worth..WHAT?”

I guess I just don’t understand her value system. It’s not “worth it”? Is that kind of like saying, the house is burning, and I know some of the kids are still in there, but it’s just not “worth it” to go in and save them, or even try to put the fire out?

Is she saying that it would be too much trouble, and besides, if we just drag it all out another year and a half, the fire will eventually put itself out, even though by then, there will be nothing left to save? That’s what it sounds like to me.

Report this

By ardee, August 4, 2007 at 9:52 pm #

Speaker “stuff”....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

The Speaker of the United States House of Representatives is the presiding officer—or speaker—of the United States House of Representatives. The position is elected in much the same way prime ministers are elected under a parliamentary systems. The current Speaker is Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat representing California’s 8th congressional district.{ By a plurality vote..ardee notes.}

The Constitution does not spell out the political role of the Speaker. As the office has developed historically, however, it has taken on a clearly partisan cast, very different from the speakership of the British House of Commons, which is scrupulously non-partisan. The Speaker in the United States is, by tradition, the head of the majority party in the House of Representatives, outranking the Majority Leader. The Speaker is responsible for ensuring that the House passes legislation supported by the majority party. In pursuing this goal, the Speaker may utilize his or her power to determine when each bill reaches the floor. He or she also chairs the majority party’s House steering committee. While the Speaker is the functioning head of the House majority party, the same is not true of the President pro tempore of the Senate, whose office is primarily ceremonial and honorary.

The Speaker is the highest-ranking member of the opposition party and is normally the chief public opponent of the President’s agenda.

[edit] Presiding officer
The Speaker holds a variety of powers as the presiding officer of the House of Representatives, but normally delegates them to another member of the majority party.

On the floor of the House, the presiding officer is always addressed as “Mister Speaker” or “Madam Speaker” (even if the Speaker him or herself is not the individual presiding). When the House resolves itself into a Committee of the Whole, the Speaker designates a member to preside over the Committee as the Chairman, who is addressed as “Mister Chairman” or “Madam Chairman.” Before any member may speak, he or she must seek the presiding officer’s recognition. The presiding officer may call on members as he or she pleases, and may therefore control the flow of debate. The presiding officer also rules on all points of order, but such rulings may be appealed to the whole House (although the appeal is invariably tabled on a party-line vote). The Speaker is responsible for maintaining decorum in the House, and may order the Sergeant-at-Arms to enforce the rules.

The Speaker’s powers and duties extend beyond presiding in the chamber. In particular, the Speaker has great influence over the committee process. The Speaker selects nine of the thirteen members of the powerful Committee on Rules, subject to the approval of the conference of the majority party.  Moreover, when a bill is introduced, the Speaker determines which committee shall consider it. As a member of the House, the Speaker is entitled to participate in debate and to vote. By custom, however, he or she does so only in exceptional circumstances. Normally, the Speaker votes only when his or her vote would be decisive, and on matters of great importance (such as constitutional amendments).

ardee again,
The speaker is chairman of the rules committee which gives her enormous power, a shame she chooses not to weild it…for whatever reasons…..

P.S. I really wish these “Zionist under every bed ” folks would simply go away…...

Report this

By DennisD, August 4, 2007 at 4:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The only thing all our politicians at every level of government in this country can say after each term they’ve completed is that things have gotten much better for themselves and not the American people. Nancy Pelosi rising through the ranks by going along to get along doesn’t impress me at all, it happens every day in government as well as private business. It does not signify leadership or courage only the ability to hang on long enough to get to the top.
This country never needed leaders anymore than now in its history and all we have is bureaucratic incompetents at best and criminals at worst running it.
Pelosi should have let the children she had at the podium keep the gavel she so proudly held up for all to see. There might have been a leader among them.
She is not. She lost any credibility she might have had when she took IMPEACHMENT off the table.

Report this

By GodSend, August 4, 2007 at 1:16 pm #

Nancy Pelosi is the ‘Speaker’ for Zionist Democrats who support Israel FIRST! The Iraq invasion and occupation is in Israel’s interest, NOT in America’s interest. Israeli and American Zionists (Democrats as well as Republicans) don’t give a rat’s ass about how many Americans (or others) die or get maimed for life while promoting Israel’s interests around the world.

None dare call it treason - but IT IS!

Report this

By farmertx, August 4, 2007 at 10:52 am #

#92012 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/03 at 2:57 pm
As a 62yo wm I think Nancy is really nice looking as well.
But nice looks don’t get the job done.
Nancy promised that the Democrat’s would stop the influence of K street types…and didn’t try that hard.
Granted she is far and away the best Speaker we have seen in a long time. Sam Rayburn comes to mind there.
But Nancy would gain much support, though little money, in stopping the endless, useless investigations and announcing a Bill of Impeachment.
And that seems to be the trouble; she doesn’t want to lose the money that is"donated” when she ignores what the public wants.
Let her change that aspect and I’ll be all for her and others who follow her. But not while she follows the money.

Report this

By cyrena, August 4, 2007 at 10:49 am #

#92135 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/04 at 6:05 am

•  First off I would be the first to admit that she is not newly elected to congress but she is the newly elected speaker of the house.

It may be a minor technicality to you, but it really does make a difference. Nancy was NOT “elected” to be the new Speaker of the House. It was a political promotion based on her seniority. I don’t know why it wasn’t Murtha. Hasn’t he been in the House longer than her? I just don’t think there is any “election” process that determined she would be the speaker. It happened because the Dems won a majority after the last election, and from my understanding of the process, that automatically puts the senior representative of the (new) majority as the Speaker. It’s like a default process. And.. NO, Ms. Pelosi did NOT single-handedly carry-off the mission of regaining the house after 12 years of repuglican monopoly. I think some of the other 300 million of us had something to do with that. Hastert and DeLay met their own demise, as well they should have.

That’s where we see the problem, is in Ms. Pelosi’s penchant to stifle all conversation or even legitimate questions posed by – THE REST OF US-

So, it’s not about anybody wanting to lynch her, because I said a long time ago, that I would not be the least bit annoyed if she just retired to a series of private cruise ships, and spent the rest of her days in idyllic splendor. I just want her out of the Congress, (and especially as Speaker) because she won’t do her job. And contrary to what you keep positing, she HASN’T done her job, because she’s about political expediency, and playing out some individualized fantasy of herself as Queen of America, or Parliament’s Royalty.
Still, the rest of us were just as elated, and certainly at least hopeful, once we finally did gain some legitimate agency (in numbers) after the election. And, those hopes were almost immediately dashed when Ms. Speaker announced that impeachment was “off the table”. She doubled the disaster by agreeing to hand over any sum of money that george asked for, to continue his “war of terror” on the rest of the world, as well as the rest of us, here at home. And, didn’t even bother to get us a receipt.

That’s when we knew that she had turned into our worse nightmare, instead of what we expected from a public official.

So, since you have such an infatuation with her, you would certainly be doing a major civic duty, if you just take her off into the sunset with you, and let us find somebody that’s willing to do what we’re paying them to do.

And, happy sailing.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 4, 2007 at 10:05 am #

OK, I surrender you bloggers that are impatient with the machinations of government are all correct Ms. Pelosi is Bad and Evil, what was I thinking of course your all right she is a thoughtless selfish bitch?

But before I join the lynching mob and call for her resignation and her political execution I would like to launch just one last defense of my fair lady.

First off I would be the first to admit that she is not newly elected to congress but she is the newly elected speaker of the house.

Secondly many of you are just too willing to throw out the good in your search for the perfect person who will reverse all the damage caused by Bush’s henchmen people like Hastert and Delay and get it done the day before yesterday. Wow I have never encountered such intolerance when it comes to trying to get things accomplished in a still hostile environment. The wheels of congress move almost as slow the tectonic plates

As a 66-year-old male liberal from NY I must confess that I am very infatuated with Nancy. I have been a student of politics all my life and I cannot recall a happier time than when the democrats regained control the House in 2006. Finally after 6 long grueling years of watching my country being misled by a Machiavellian leader and a rubber stamp congress our nightmare was coming to an end.

I had no delusions that things would change quickly but it was the beginning of the end for Mr. Bush and company and their misadventures overseas and their rape and pillaging of the treasury. Nancy had almost single handedly taken on this powerful juggernaut and won back the peoples house for the democrats.

Apparently many of her critics have forgotten how horrendous the situation was before Ms. Pelosi was handed the gavel. Despite the fact that she has not been able to achieve everything that we liberals want I must admit that I am still madly in love with this wonderful lady. Obviously many of you will not be happy until the tyrannical despots are back in charge. Then you might get to appreciate how special Nancy really is.

Report this

By cyrena, August 3, 2007 at 11:42 pm #

Can someone, (maybe #92012 by SEQUOIABIS) explain how we believe that Nancy Pelosi was “elected” to be the speaker for all of us?

That seems to be the theme of the apologists for her lack of efficiency and effectiveness in the position. That she is our “newly elected” leader of the House.

This is misleading. Nancy Pelosi was “elected” by her own district, AND, if I’m not mistaken, (I could be) became the SPEAKER, ONLY because she was the most SENIOR representative of the house at the time that the rest of us put the Dems in majority control of the House, in the last election.

So, she isn’t “newly” elected. She’s been “climbing and rolling” the Halls of Congress for years, and supported by the same 10K a plate fundraisers that Ardee mentioned in his earlier post.

And, her highest priority in the most recent years, has been to steamroll and otherwise silence ANY and ALL opposition to her controlling and dowager type behavior. So, she’s done nothing but stifle any other voices or opinions within the Congress or even her own party, if they don’t go along with her personal agenda.

So, let’s stop the excuses for Ms. Pelosi. She is NOT concerned with the majority of her constituents in her own district, nor is she even supportive of her fellow colleagues of either party, in the Congress.

Ms. Pelosi thinks this is all about HER, (and her small wealthy base) rather than it is about the troops that continue to die daily, or the thousands of innocent others in Iraq and elsewhere, while she continues to practice political expediency.

So, I think I said this before; Nancy is a danger to our Republic, and a continued threat to our survival as a nation that claims the rule of law for it’s legitimacy.

PS…I think the senate just passed the enhanced spy bill that george wants, that Nancy had already committed the House to approving. This is treason.

Report this

By ardee, August 3, 2007 at 10:48 pm #

#92012 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/03 at 2:57 pm
(5 comments total)

Just one small correction for my good friend “ardee”.

Ms. Pelosi did keep her word to get the House to vote for a rollback of the tax incentives given to the oil companies and thanks to her leadership it passed the house overwhelmingly. BUT it got bogged down in the Senate and the president has promised to veto the bill.

Now I must wonder, sir or madam, at one who scribes so well yet believes the two percent “rollback” (please) Pelosi and friends offered was indeed keeping a campaign promise. There is loyalty and then there is something else again…...oh and I havent posted anything to you that could be described as anger, misplaced or otherwise. I may get angry at fools and liars, but I am rather calm and collected when talking about legislators who are fooling the electorate.

Report this

By farmertx, August 3, 2007 at 9:16 pm #

#92012 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/03 at 2:57 pm

I will grant that she did her part on that one issue.
She also pledged to clean up the ethics on the Hill, and then went to a $10k/plate fundraiser.
I’m sorry, but that smacks of special interests. Don’t imagine there were that many of her actual constituents at that affair.
And the constituents are who the politician’s are supposed to be listening to, rather than the folks with all the money.
That is how we wound up in this mess.

Report this

By GB, August 3, 2007 at 8:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

For those who feel we who think Speaker Pelosi is not acting on the behalf of the true sentiment in this country today need a civics 101 lesson sound biased to this failure.
Cheney and Bush have suceeded in continuing to rip up the constitution on the Democratic watch in the 110th Congress and particularly with regards to MS Pelosi’s leadership.
First, she announced in ‘06 she would circumvent the Constitution by announcing a majority Democratic Congress would take impeachment “off the table” knowing there have been high crimes committed by Bush Administration. Even if they don’t get a conviction this is the only way to get Bush and Cheney to explain to the American people what they are really up to or at least make their lies more noticable to Fox news watchers.
Secondly, just by complaining about the Administration’s behaviour and sending bills they know Bush will veto is just dragging on the theft of innocent lives, our treasury, and our rights.
Congress needs someone in leadership to stand up and say this is enough and I don’t see it ever coming from Pelosi. I wish I was wrong because this could be a golden opportunity.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 3, 2007 at 6:57 pm #

Just one small correction for my good friend “ardee”.

Ms. Pelosi did keep her word to get the House to vote for a rollback of the tax incentives given to the oil companies and thanks to her leadership it passed the house overwhelmingly. BUT it got bogged down in the Senate and the president has promised to veto the bill.

Once again your anger is misplaced, this is a classic example of her limited power. She was able to use her leadership to get the job done in her backyard but the Senate democrats have too narrow a majority to get anything accomplished.

If you keep blaming Nancy for not being able to quickly resolve all the problems the Bush regime has created during the last six years you will taint her as the cause of the difficulties and not as the refreshing solution to reversing the abuse that has transpired.

House Votes to Rescind Tax Break for Oil Companies.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/19/business/19royalty.html?ex=1326862800&en=4cd9d3ffc98249ff&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

Report this

By ardee, August 3, 2007 at 1:49 pm #

#91943 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/03 at 7:02 am
(4 comments total)

I must say that I am a little disappointed by the hostile reaction to our newly elected Speaker.

I fully support the goals of the rock throwing bloggers who want to end this war NOW but I fail to see how they could possibly Blame Ms. Pelosi for the delay.

I believe their anger should be directed where it belongs at the large empty-headed W the true Alfred E. Newman of politics and the real cause of the bloodshed.

In truth I believe that the real blame must be placed upon the electorate. If the elections in 2000 and 2004 had been the landslides they should have been there would have been no opportunity to steal them. We have become far too complacent and too many good folks have become sickened by politics and refuse to participate, a recipe for disaster.

Surely one who scribes as well as you can think and understand the reasons for the animosity to the lack of eloquence if not action of Ms. Pelosi. She promised, during the 06 campaign, to end the subsidies to the profit bloated oil companies. She did not. The election in 06 was about ending this horrid little war for profit and she knows this. If she is blocked from doing so by legislative maneuverings she must say so to the American public. If the GOP is using any means necesary to stop legislation she must publically berate them for doing so.

The Democratic Party, and thus its leadership, appears foolish and helpless and has for almost seven years and counting. How can you appear so stunned at the reaction of folks here? Why are you not a bit more stunned yourself at the successes of Bush and the GOP?

I see the silence of the Democratic lambs leading to a surprise slaughter in ‘08. I do not care about the inner workings of the Congress, I care about the continuing deaths of our troops. I care about the ongoing theft of our treasury to those who wrote the largest campaign checks to Bush. I think it supremely foolish of the Democrats to have forgotten that we out here need to hear from them.

Report this

By GodSend, August 3, 2007 at 1:42 pm #

Do we need a defense of our flip-flapping ‘leaders’ at this crucial stage of America’s history?

What is the situation and what actions are required?

http://smokingmirrors.blogspot.com/

Report this

By Leefeller, August 3, 2007 at 1:32 pm #

Jbart,

Mediocre hatchet job on California.  My pet rock has feelings too!  Stereotyping your opinions is nice if you cannot find a real issue to discuss.  As a life long Californian I find your premise only slightly more worthy than the likes of Russ Limbaugh or Ann Colter.

Instead of attacking the issues, you did not even attack the messenger but the state.  Interesting, I had to listen to something like your attempted praddle, from my D.I. when I was in the service   He used to say “ California, nothing but steers and queers”. I found his comment both moronic but amusing at the same time, the smile on his face supported my opinion. 

Your personal attacks on California may be justified but your arguments are not.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 3, 2007 at 11:02 am #

I must say that I am a little disappointed by the hostile reaction to our newly elected Speaker.

I fully support the goals of the rock throwing bloggers who want to end this war NOW but I fail to see how they could possibly Blame Ms. Pelosi for the delay.

I believe their anger should be directed where it belongs at the large empty-headed W the true Alfred E. Newman of politics and the real cause of the bloodshed.

I am a NY liberal who was not fooled for 1 second by Mr. Bush’s lies that led us into an unjustified war, unlike Hillary who was actually representing the opinions of AIPAC, Nancy voted against the war.

I do not wish to get into a food fight with my colleagues especially since I agree with them that the war should be ended immediately if not sooner.

But I must take strong exception to their misplaced anger. If Speaker Pelosi were Queen of America then I would have to agree with the rock throwers, off with her head. But Speaker Pelosi has very limited power at this time. We are all waiting patiently for the election of 2008 when we can get a stronger foothold in government, namely control of the White House and a filibuster proof Senate. Until that happens she is powerless to bring down this psychopathic killer and his heartless cohort Igor.

Please get real about what she can and cannot achieve.
Would you critics of this wonderful lady rather go back to having the rubber stamp Denni Hastert and his sidekick Tom Delay back in charge???

I think some of you are in desperate need of a civics lesson on how the government actually works.
To disparage this hard working liberal lady with such vicious contempt makes me wonder whether or not these flame throwing critics are sad to see a change in congress, and despise Pelosi because she actually has the audacity to stand up to the mad man from Texas.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 3, 2007 at 10:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I must say that I am a little disappointed by the hostile reaction to our newly elected Speaker.

I fully support the goals of the rock throwing bloggers who want to end this war NOW but I fail to see how they could possibly Blame Ms. Pelosi for the delay.

I believe their anger should be directed where it belongs at the large empty-headed W the true Alfred E. Newman of politics and the real cause of the bloodshed.

I am a NY liberal who was not fooled for 1 second by Mr. Bush’s lies that led us into an unjustified war, unlike Hillary, Nancy voted against the war.

I do not wish to get into a food fight with my colleagues especially since I agree with them that the war should be ended immediately if not sooner.

But I must take strong exception to their misplaced anger. If Speaker Pelosi were Queen of America then I would have to agree with the rock throwers, off with her head. But Speaker Pelosi has very limited power at this time. We are all waiting patiently for the election of 2008 when we can get a stronger foothold in government, namely control of the White House and a filibuster proof senate. Until that happens she is powerless to bring down this psychopathic killer and his heartless cohort Igor.

Please get real about what she can and cannot achieve.
Would you critics of this wonderful lady rather go back to having the rubber stamp Denni Hastert and his sidekick Tom Delay back in charge of the House???

I think some of you are in desperate need of a civics lesson on how the government actually works.
To disparage this hard working liberal lady with such vicious contempt makes me wonder whether or not these flame throwing critics are sad to see a change in congress, and despise Pelosi because she actually has the audacity to stand up to the mad man from Texas.

Report this

By jbart, August 2, 2007 at 11:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In writing my last post I forgot to mention a comment to
#91655 SEQUOIABIS
Q: “What planet are you from”?
A: California
To Santefebearclaw…
What makes her a compassionate & intelligent person?
The ability to articulate? A good education in English takes care of that perception. What everyone, at least everyone who cares that is, is ACTION(S) !!  Don’t tell me, show me. And in that, all she has shown is to continue the status quo, more of the same. She represents all that is wrong with our political & social system. The “show me” mentality that is attributed to Missouri has a real strong “bottom line”. Talk is cheap. Action is what’s required and should be demanded as of our elected, political, leaders. In other words…
“Do your job”, the “job you were elected to do”. And do what you promised to do for the voter’s who put you in the position to do it, damn it !!!

Report this

By jbart, August 2, 2007 at 11:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Next to the “red states” Californians are the “worst” of the “worst”. They aren’t just crazy, they’re defficient Americans.
Q: What are they really??
A: A bunch of transplanted people, who now live in a nice, temperate, climate.  Spoiled by the wealth there, they seem to believe that THEY KNOW !!! 
Look back people…
Who gave us the Pet Rock?  Who told us that putting a plastic pyramid under our beds would give us intelligence and wisdom, while we slept? Who gave us R. Nixon? R. Reagan? “I’ll be back, Arnold?” Chief Justice Renquist? (the ass’t D.A who pushed (real hard) to intern Japanese-Americans during WWII)and became Chief Justice by NIXON?.
The “reds” are, at least, understandable due to their historic ignorance. But, those damn Californians are given way too much credit for their opinions and, based on their land size, have too much power in our gov’t. Nancy is just another of the “cookie-cutter” Californians. She only is where she is due to the size of her state. This is another problem we have that never seems to get the attention it truly deserves. We must do everything possible to stop these ‘transplants” from our decision-making body of politicians.
How about WE “move” out there, inconspiciously, of course. Run for office, wink-wink,win and really affect change. Call me a radical idiot, if it suits you, but I see it as a major problem. In the past, the present, and (unfortunately if things don’t change),in the future.

Report this

By Leefeller, August 2, 2007 at 10:16 pm #

Nancy Polosi,

Is partisan politics at it’s worst.  When she took over as speaker of the House, I had high hopes that she would get us out of Iraq.  When she announced Impeachment is off the table, she showed her hand to the enemy.(The White House) 

The differences between the Republicans and Democrats is very slight, as we have seen, business as usual, special interests and lobbyists call the shots.

Oversight of the financing by opportunists is a common problem in our government, I mean oversight as an excuse.

Congress has turned a blind eye to what is left of the Constitution. Our distrust of Congress is worthy.

Report this

By republicanSScareme, August 2, 2007 at 10:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Pelosi’s statement that she does not want to divide the country is ludricious.  The country is already divided, Nancy, thanks to the hateful Republicans.  Watch Fox News if you don’t believe the Republicans preach hatred.  They also do it through CNN, MSNBC and all the other major networks. They want Americans to hate the Islamic people and the Democrats, but bend over for the Zionists.  Dopey Pelosi even said herself that the Jewish Lobby was in control.  She probably gets a lot of money from them.

I am a lifelong Democrat, but I find Ms. Pelosi very dubious.  She relates to Republicans because she is part of their country-club, rich-thug “better class”. In truth, Pelosi ia one of them.

Report this

By tyler, August 2, 2007 at 10:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Pelosi benefits from the bush’s reaganomic tax cuts.  She is a dud.

Report this

By ardee, August 2, 2007 at 9:05 pm #

for #91706 by Biloxi on 8/02 at 9:29 am
(Unregistered commenter)

While I am certain that you are not at all interested in truth here is that truth about Ms. Pelosi’s wealth, and her husband’s true career…Take your garbage elsewhere….


Financial status
The Pelosi family has a net worth of over US$25 million, primarily from Paul Pelosi’s investments. In addition to their large portfolio of jointly owned San Francisco Bay Area real estate, he also has millions of dollars in stock from publicly traded companies such as Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&T. In 2003, the Pelosi family sold their eight-acre (three hectare) Rutherford vineyard. Pelosi continues to be among the richest members of Congress.[5] In early 2007, Speaker Pelosi and two other prominent Democrats failed to disclose their positions as officers of family charities. This violated a law requiring members of Congress to disclose such positions. Brendan Daly, spokesman for Speaker Pelosi, called the failure to report the position she has held since 1992 “an oversight.”[6]

Report this

By ardee, August 2, 2007 at 8:57 pm #

#91655 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/02 at 6:42 am
(3 comments total)

What an eloquent defense of Ms. Pelosi. She comes from my neighborhood yet I could not mount as near a wonderous post as this one.

If you wish to cite her intellect, her vision or her speeches I would agree they are suberb. I do not expect this crop of limited thinkers to actually think about the difficulties faced by Ms. Pelosi and the other liberals in Congress, only react to an abysmal lack of progress by democrats with the usual stupidities.

I do have to say that , while I understand that it is the system that mires the progressive agenda, it is the system that is in dire need of reform, and it is the system that eats and discards a well intentioned Pelosi I cannot muster much in the way of praise for this Congress, Nancy included. There are always courses open to her, she could dig in her heels, risk losing the right wing of the democratic party, but stand on her conscience. Alas she does not.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 2, 2007 at 7:53 pm #

My god I thought Truthdig was a heaven for free thinking liberals, but many of you sound like flame throwing anarchists.

I am a little disappointed with the impatience for our newly elected speaker. Apparently many of you have forgotten that this beautiful American lady is the equivalent of France’s Joan of Arc. She has almost single handedly rescued our nation from the death grip of the dictatorial fascists that had complete control of the three branches of government. And we were powerless to stop their killing, looting and plundering until Nancy got on her horse rode around the country proclaiming her intentions and won back the congress from the villainous Huns that had overtaken our country.

If this heroine had not eloquently articulated the lies and deceit being perpetrated against the American people we would still have gluttonous Denni Hastert as Speaker and the exterminator Mr. Delay as his puppeteer.

I have to agree with a lot of the criticisms about her connections to AIPAC and her confused signals in that area but I see before me a woman who has made history and managed to get control of the peoples house. I am willing to allow her a lot more than just a few months to clean out the house open some windows let in some fresh air and begin anew.

I cannot believe you critics who I sympathize with completely are not willing to be her cheerleaders while she is still fighting the dragons, this eating of our own will only bring the barbarians back.

Report this

By cyrena, August 2, 2007 at 5:43 pm #

#91655 by SEQUOIABIS on 8/02 at 6:42 am

Sequoiabis,

Nobody is “slandering” Nancy Pelosi. We are taxpaying citizens, (some of whom probably voted for her) and whether we did or not, she’s still a public employee, who has to answer to the people who pay her salary. That’s the way the system works.

In the private sector, (which we know MS. Pelosi overwhelmingly supports) she would be expected to do what the stockholders tell her to do, or her ass would be canned. In a S.F. minute. Now, maybe that is exactly what Ms. Pelosi IS doing…catering to the stockholders of the defense industry, and the military industrial complex, to which she is so beholden. Maybe she has to deliver for Boeing, or any number of others. Either way, those are the WRONG stockholders for her to be representing as a public official. WE are the ones she needs to answer to, and she’s not doing it. Period.

It doesn’t matter if she’s a nice compassionate person. We already have a whole bunch of nice, compassionate, and basically powerless people in our gathering of citizens here, so we just need somebody who knows what the hell he or she is DOING, and to get on with the people’s work. If she doesn’t want to do the work, then she doesn’t need the job. She can go be nice and compassionate at the bridge or yacht club. We need somebody that’s willing to get their hands dirty.

As for “class” we don’t care about that either. Hers is a faux “class” anyway. Class is Jacqueline Kennedy, or Coretta Scott King, or Maya Angelou, just to name a few. It comes with INTEGRITY. Fancy suits covering a shell; do not make “class”.

Nancy is an older and whiter version of Condi, and neither of them is doing anything more than adding fuel to the fire, while they further their personal agendas. So, let’s just call a mannequin what it is – a mannequin of the status quo-faux.

Meantime, how many more of our troops and Iraqi civilians will die today?

Report this

By dick, August 2, 2007 at 5:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

she is of the power elite, which does include AIPAC and all other power elites, such as Congress, ceos, religious fanatics,etc. They do what they want, which is continuous war, particularly in the middle east. It will not change

Report this

By Mudwollow, August 2, 2007 at 4:32 pm #

Great, an unflappable speaker to go along with our unflappable president. Neither one of them cares in the slightest about their poll numbers. And why in the world should they? There are only two parties and except for a ludicrous façade they are indistinguishable from each other. George and Nancy aren’t worried about their positions because they know the voters have no other options. They both know it’s the elites who control the American government. They both know they will be safe and well cared for as long as they do the bidding of the special interest elites.

Are you a little frustrated with George Bush? Are you also a little frustrated with Nancy (impeachment off the table) Pelosi? Those are your only two choices, so if you don’t like them you are screwed. Oh, and remember to get out there and vote.

And I love Nancy too, with barbecue sauce.

Report this

By GodSend, August 2, 2007 at 4:02 pm #

It’s real simple, folks.

THE problem is that Zionists (Democrats AND Republicans), who put the interests of Israel BEFORE the interests of America, have no intentions of getting America out of Iraq UNTIL Iraq has been partitioned into separate mini-States which can be easily dominated by Israel. Meanwhile, control of Iraqi oil is what America gets out of its eternal presence there. Why else would we be building huge military bases there - and a HUGE embassy!?

American Zionists (Israel FIRSTers), such as Bush, Cheney, Rice, Pelosi, Clinton, Lieberman, Barack, etc, and all the Neocons have pledged their allegiance to ISRAEL, NOT America! That makes them TRAITORS! What should we do with traitors? It’s obvious, isn’t it?! Did you say “Put them on El Al with a 1-way ticket to Israel!”? They could expect worse, shouldn’t they!?

Patriotic Americans must outlaw the Zionist Party - before Israel drains us of our blood and treasure!

Report this

By loveinatub, August 2, 2007 at 3:29 pm #

I’m also disappointed with Pelosi. She’s too “status-quo” and not challenging enough the status-quo. She does not challenge the imperial ways of George W. Bush and it is her constitutional obligation to put impeachment proceedings “on the table” given that she’s a publicly elected official and her first duty is to the constitution. She champions a farm bill that could go way further in promoting organic food and reducing subsidies to the corn, soybean and wheat industries. I’m not really sure if there is anything liberal about Pelosi. She hasn’t taken a public stand on single payer healthcare. So what if she supports extended government insurance for children. Even a republican could vote for that. Where’s the creation of a liberal agenda?  Where are the defining issues that forcefully come into play challenging the status quo?
Pelosi doesn’t have to win the causes she fights for but she has to champion the issues that are integral to a liberal agenda. She must champion single-payer healthcare, decriminalization of marijuana. She must advocate for a vastly expanded Food and Drug administration which is woefully underfunded, in particular, the nation’s total inadequate number of food inspectors who are supposed to guarantee the quality of our nation’s food supply.

Nancy Pelosi is pushing on some things but she hasn’t won the PR battle between her and Bush. Bush still comes across as winner in this whole Iraq debacle. Bush may plummet in the polls but it’s not causing millions upon millions of people to protest in front of the White House. If Pelosi put impeachment proceedings front and center, she’d show some moxy. As it is, her accomplishments thus far are minimal.

Report this

By Emily Anne, August 2, 2007 at 3:17 pm #

We got what we voted for - Bush.

Report this

By L. Gordon, August 2, 2007 at 3:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Nancy,

Don’t sqander the chance that VOTERS provided you and your collegues. We wanted this war to end and the Bush Administration be held accountable for their many wrongdoings. These are the issues that must be addressed BEFORE anything else CAN BE ADDED TO THE PUBLIC DIALOUGE. FALTER AT YOUR OWN POLITICAL PERIL!!!

Report this

By Leefeller, August 2, 2007 at 3:01 pm #

Biloxi on 8/02 at 9:29 a

If true, sort of makes sense.  The feet dragging and fixing the game for friends and family, makes more sense than waiting for the September kicking the can , smoke and mirrors from the White House. 

You may have hit the bankster on the head, seems all the opportunists try and out due each other.

Report this

By Jonas South, August 2, 2007 at 3:01 pm #

Many sstute observers have pointed out that Pelosi’s blanket position that ‘impeachment is off the table’ is flawed constitutionally. Constitutionally because impeachment proceeding against a sitting president is part of the sworn duty of all who sit in congress, and it depends not on what the Speaker chooses to do, but on what the President does.

Pelosi’s pre-mature ‘off the table’ decision also reveals her as a poor tactician: It is just plain stupid to unilaterally disarm, and hope that this president will behave himself from here on in. A playground bully like Bush only respects countervening power. Pelosi’s decision allows Bush to continue to bully us.

I supported her when she was not in power, but no more. The country needs a more forceful leader of the opposition against an imperial President.

Report this

By Jonas South, August 2, 2007 at 2:54 pm #

Many sstute observers have pointed out that Pelosi’s blanket position that ‘impeachment is off the table’ is flawed constitutionally. Constitutionally because impeachment proceeding against a sitting president is part of the sworn duty of all who sit in congress, and it depends not on what the Speaker chooses to do, but on what the President does.

Pelosi’s pre-mature ‘off the table’ decision also reveals her as a poor tactician: It is just plain stupid to unilaterally disarm, and hope that this president will behave himself from here on in. A play-ground bully like Bush only respects countervening power. Pelosi’s decision allows Bush to continue to bully us.

I supported her when she was not in power, but no more. The country needs a more forceful leader of the opposition against an imperial President.

Report this

By Biloxi, August 2, 2007 at 1:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Pelosi’s husband, an INTERNATIONAL BANKSTER.  What’s to know other than the fact that the GLOBALIST BANKSTERS (Pelosi ... 55 Billion net worth) and the bankrupt defense industry (also Pelosi, et al) can’t stop this madness because they’ll all be exposed for who they are and what they’ve done to America, since THEIR/OUR defacto President dictated it by setting up the “TRILATERALS.”

Report this

By santafebearclaw, August 2, 2007 at 12:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I must admit that I was hopeful when Nancy Pilosi became Speaker of the House; however, I am highly disappointed in her.  Not only does she not know or choose to play defensively, she knows nothing about playing offensively.  As a matter of fact, she’s sitting on the bench.  She also has no sense of priorities nor is she paying attention to what “we the people” are demanding. 

and to SEQUOIABIS: What planet are you living on?
“Just imagine where we would be right now without Nancy as speaker, no oversight and a government run amok spending our money like a drunken sailor.”

 
In addition, she’s the one that took impeachment off the table:
“Realistically, there is no way that impeachment will ever pass the house or get voted on by the senate. So why should the speaker waste her time…”

I agree that Nancy Pilosi may be a compassion, intellectual woman, but I’m afraid she’s not tough enough for the job.

Report this

By KISS, August 2, 2007 at 11:22 am #

Pelosi is a lying bitch of the highest caliber. Cindy Sheehan will easily beat Pelosi…and that is a good thing. Pelosi conned the dimmos into thinking she had balls, nope it was just a case of cramps. She cannot fathom impeachment of the two criminals holding the two highest offices of the land. As far as getting out of Iraq it ain’t gonna happen with her in office. Oh Ya, the same above applies to that scum-bag Harry Reid, another ball-less leader.

Report this

By farmertx, August 2, 2007 at 11:06 am #

Cyrena as usual is pretty well dead on target.
Nancy is a fine looking woman, granted, but her words are belied by her actions.
No Democrat can expect any meaningful legislation to pass while Shrub is in charge. Hell, if they over ride his veto, he’ll just issue a signing statement that will negate the bill in question.
What Nancy and all Congress Critter’s need to be doing is getting the Shootist and the Shrub out of office before any more damage has been done.
Shrub has flouted the Constitution so many times that all is left for him is to burn it.
Speaking of that, has any one actually seen the Constitution lately?
Politics as usual is what got us to this point. We need something different to get us back on track.

Report this

By Leefeller, August 2, 2007 at 11:02 am #

Nancy says,

“I’m very concerned that they will kick the can further down the road, or talk about a few anecdotal successes that they’ll try to pass off as the (whole) situation in Iraq,” she says.

Bush says,
we are going to be in Iraq for a long long time,  the can has already been kicked out of sight, what else can we expect, but more of the same insanity from partisan politics.

Nancy’s stated concern about kicking the can further in September, is a joke on us. Congress has been watching the can kicking from the very beginning and are just now concerned.

Report this

By Bleeding Heart, August 2, 2007 at 10:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

What Pelosi is doing is pushing domestic policies that counteract many of the policies that have been implemented by the Republicans over the past few decades.  These Republican (the pure uber-capitalists) policies have served to roll back much the New Deal that created the middle class in the first place.  So for this, she is to be commended.  I think her goal is to, as the article says, chisle at the wall where she sees some cracks and opportunity, knowing that she doesn’t have the votes to change the tide on the war.  Furthermore, she is probably right when she says that impeachment proceedings would divide the nation, and again, that they don’t have the votes.  But for the country to be divided moreso as a result of impeachment proceedings than it is now is hard to imagine. 

I for one, am not quite sure what motivates the Democrats - power, principle, or both.  They are coming across to the public as weak and ineffective.  The Republican effort to portray the “surge” as “making progress” is convenienty already underway.  Just listen to their talking points.  But I simply cannot understand why the Democrats have such a communication problem.  One would think that the ammount of ammunition provided to them by this administration would be a wet dream to the Democrats.  Yet they’re silent.   

The right wing has spin and deception down to a science.  I guess the reason stems from the idiocy of their constituency, who time and time again vote against their economic self interests and well being in oder to hear their politicians say the word “God”, allow them have a gun, and enable them to feel justified in their own base bigotry and hate. But I will say that the Democrats are, without a doubt, being steamrolled by this administration. And this perception will not translate into more Democrats in Congress. If they back down again in September, they can kiss their party goodbye because they proved to the public that their mere words are nothing more than political theater to appease their constituency.

Report this

By SEQUOIABIS, August 2, 2007 at 10:42 am #

I love Nancy.

I cannot tell you how happy I was on election night of November of 2006 when America finally woke up and put the dems in charge of the house and gave them the slimiest of margins in the senate, depending upon how Lieberman feels on a particular day.

She is the only person right now standing between a callous USA fascist dictator and an invasion of Iran.

What is all this ridiculous criticism of this fantastic classy woman? Nancy Pelosi is a compassionate intellect who in my opinion would make a great president.

She is diligently trying to undo the mess the republican administration has gotten us into. And she is trying to accomplish the goals that the majority of the American people support in a house that is not capable of over riding a veto and a senate that cannot even get a censure against the president passed.

What in heavens name do you expect from this feisty lady?? She is only the speaker of the house not the president and her powers are very limited.

Instead of directing your venomous unfounded complaints against this lovely lady, maybe you should be addressing the real culprits in this scenario, the president and his enablers the republican party.

Realistically, there is no way that impeachment will ever pass the house or get voted on by the senate. So why should the speaker waste her time and our money trying to end the presidents term in office by a few months when the results of this tactic are already known???

Just imagine where we would be right now without Nancy as speaker, no oversight and a government run amok spending our money like a drunken sailor.

I know we are all angry and want the Bush crime family to be held accountable for their lies and crimes against humanity but this type of justice will have to wait until we have control of at least two branches of government.

Her critics are misdirecting their bitterness; do not slander this wonderful compassionate woman who is trying hard to end the war. She did not cause these problems and should not be blamed for not being able to resolve them or stop them right now. Go after the real villains in America’s rape, the Bush/Cheney regime.

Report this

By Scott, August 2, 2007 at 10:30 am #

I think people are dreaming if they think the Democrats intend to roll back the new executive powers vested in the Whitehouse.

I would say Pelosi is actually an integral part of the solution. The right wing is not a place you see, its a direction.

Report this

By Casy, August 2, 2007 at 9:22 am #

To describe Pelosi as underwhelming is an understatement. She’s ineffective as Speaker of the House. She’s part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Report this

By cyrena, August 2, 2007 at 6:06 am #

I think Pelosi is in her own fantasy world, and that it has nothing to do with the real world that the rest of us reside in - now, in real time.

She apparently thinks this is her “bewitching hour” after 20 plus years of the standard “climb”, and in the meantime, we’re all being drug or shoved right over the cliff.

She’s playing to a rapidly diminishing audience.

Earlier today, she agreed to go along with the plan that george is trying to ram through, to nullify FISA, by “changing” it to allow him to legally do, what he’s been illegally doing. She thinks it’s just fine, even though she’s supposed to have enough sense to know that FISA ALREADY allows george to do what it is that he claims he needs to do, to track down all of the “terrorists”.

Nancy has become a danger to our National Security.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.