LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Blagojevich vs. the Senate

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Bring In the Peacekeepers?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Gringos in Paradise

Gringos in Paradise

By Barry Golson
$17.16

Toward an Open Tomb

Toward an Open Tomb

By Michel Warschawski
$14.95

more items

 
Reports

The Partisan Trailblazers

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 2, 2007

By E.J. Dionne

WASHINGTON—Perhaps you missed it, but Wednesday was the 19th anniversary of Rush Limbaugh’s radio show. Limbaugh was celebrating his ripe old age, in media years, on the same week that liberal blog fans were trekking to Chicago for the YearlyKos convention. Therein lies one of the most important stories in American politics.

    Make no mistake: From the beginning, Limbaugh was a revolutionary figure. He befuddled Democrats and the journalistic establishment because he was an up-to-date throwback. The large audience he won on the right marked the return in the U.S. of openly partisan mass media, a 19th-century phenomenon that had all but disappeared in the late 20th century.

    Limbaugh is not primarily about information, though he freely uses even those bits that come his way courtesy of dreaded “liberal” media sources. His goal is mobilization, and he has been extremely good at it. He spawned conservative imitators in media markets all over the nation and aroused a faithful band of dittoheads who despise all things liberal and Democratic.

    The greatest gift to Limbaugh was Bill Clinton’s election as president in 1992. Talk show hosts are much better on offense than defense. Limbaugh was unusually hesitant about Pat Buchanan’s challenge to the first President Bush during the 1992 Republican primaries because their fight split Limbaugh’s base. With Bush dispatched that fall, Clinton brought conservatives together in rage, and Limbaugh stoked it. He deserves major credit for the Republicans’ 1994 landslide.

    Democrats and liberals realized they needed a mobilizing force of their own, but could not match Limbaugh’s reach on the radio. Enter the Internet, and Markos Moulitsas Zúniga.

    An Army veteran, a former Republican, and the son of a Salvadoran mother and a Greek father, Zúniga, 35, created his Daily Kos website on May 26, 2002—“in those dark days,” as his site puts it, “when an oppressive and war-crazed administration suppressed all dissent as unpatriotic and treasonous.” Daily Kos took off because so many Democrats shared Zúniga’s view of the second President Bush.

    Daily Kos is often described as liberal, but it is, more than anything, partisan. Its core assumption is that ideological conservatives made the Republican Party their vehicle and rallied in lock step against Democrats. The party of FDR and JFK needed to find the same discipline. The key litmus tests for Kos and his many allies in the blogosphere involve not long lists of issues developed by the ACLU or the AFL-CIO, but loyalty in standing up against Bush and doing what’s necessary to build a Democratic majority.

    And just as Limbaugh aroused passionate opposition on the left, so has Kos become the object of conservative rage. In the lead-up to Zúniga’s Chicago gathering, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, a right-wing showman who knows a threat when he sees one, has gone after Kos. “There’s no question that the most vile stuff imaginable is posted on this hate site and others like it,” O’Reilly said Tuesday.

    O’Reilly is irate that the leading Democratic presidential candidates are showing up this weekend. “The far left wants a quasi-socialistic economy and a one-world foreign policy, where national security decisions are made only with the approval of other countries,” O’Reilly fumed. “So that’s the soup the Democratic presidential candidates will be dining on when they show up at the Kos convention.”

    I’m not in the habit of giving advice to Bill O’Reilly, but there’s always a first time: Liberal rage at Rush Limbaugh not only was useless, it actually strengthened his credibility with the right. (I speak from experience.) Bill, I bet Markos loves what you’re doing.

    Personally, I dislike the use of obscenity on the Web, and many online posts are way too nasty. But the right wing, suddenly so concerned with the niceties of political discourse, did not worry much about what its militants said about Clinton, Al Gore or John Kerry. Limbaugh even blamed the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on a president who had been out of office for eight months. I’m still waiting for his apology.

    George Bush and Dick Cheney have heaped praise on Limbaugh (“Well, Rush, you’ve got a great show, as always,” Cheney said during one of his many interviews) because he’s an effective organizer for the right—even if Limbaugh has, of late, become disenchanted with some of Bush’s policies. Limbaugh desperately needs a Democratic president. Another Clinton would be perfect.

    Democratic candidates know they owe a debt to Zúniga. They’re paying homage to him because he has started to beat Limbaugh and O’Reilly at their own game. No wonder O’Reilly is so annoyed.   

    E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com.   

    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Back to Basics

Next item: The Last Days of Democracy

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By shz, August 8, 2007 at 11:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I heard 5 or 6 Limbaugh shows when he first came upon the scene.  I had never heard such venom before.  I knew I shouldn’t listen, but it was sort of like watching a train wreck, fascinatingly gruesome.  But then he attacked Chelsea Clinton, a little 13 year old girl, calling her unattractive in vulgar language.  It was sickening!  I never listened to him again, of course.  And as hard to believe as he is, I find his Ditto-heads equally unreal.  These are the hard hearted, ignorant people who have taken over our democracy.

GO KOS!  GO TRUTHDIG!  Our only defense.

Report this

By JEP, August 3, 2007 at 11:07 pm #

“He’s a big wimpy chickenhawk who hides behind his microphone. Rush would wet his trousers if he ever had to face someone like John Edwards or Chris Dodd in a serious debate.”

Now O’Reilly would consider that last statement of mine “hateful.”

But George Allen’s now infamous “kick their soft teeth down their whiney throats” (how’s your dental work feelng these days, George) was “just politics.”

HYPOCRITES.  If nothing else, all of you “journalists” who went to Bush’s little bash get to wear that label henceforth, like a prison tattoo.

And no amount of parsing after this administration leaves or gets indicted, will ever remove it.

Congratulations, to Bush’s right wing hack rouge’s list, you are now permanently saddled with Bush’s own failures, because it was that group of writers who promulgated and promoted the Big Lie, once Rove and Cheney had put it to wrds.

I doubt that any of you even believe it. You are all just media prostitutes, and your future credibility is now completely lost, whether you know it or not.

And I think some of you do….

Report this

By ctbrandon, August 3, 2007 at 8:30 pm #

I live in an area of America where the majority of people not only listen to Rush, but believe everything he says to be the Word of God. I have often times wondered if the Republican party as we know it will survive the age of Independent news, where the truth can be found by anyone willing to look for it. Time will tell.

ctbrandon
http://www.actforyourself.org

Report this

By JEP, August 3, 2007 at 10:13 am #

“Personally, I dislike the use of obscenity on the Web…”

E.J., take a walk out on the street, and just count the times you hear the “F” word. Grab a Taxi (I lived in The Village at one time, I know how NY cab drivers cuss.) Or just go to a Yankee’s game, when they are losing…

Even better, go to a behind-the-scenes meeting of Republican good old boys, and you’ll count even more swear words, especially the “F” word.

I agree, good journalists are public examples, and our language always matters, especially when young people read them. 

But “The blogs” are just an internet version of “the street,” so don’t expect the language to be much different.  And you can’t avoid hearing it on the street, on the blogs, you have to be willingly looking to read those words…

Report this

By Dale Headley, August 3, 2007 at 10:12 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This story is part of a bigger picture: the blogosphere is fast becoming more important than talk radio.  Why?  Because it brings together people who can read, write, and think for themselves to challenge the “dittoheads”, who are largely illiterate red-necks without jobs.  The very term, “dittohead” is indicative of who Limbaugh’s supporters are: people who hate thinking for themselves; instead they prefer to just say, “Ditto!”  And who is it they are slavishly (look the word up in the dictionary, dittoheads) idolizing?  A pampered, uneducated, scion of southern wealth and privilege who couldn’t make it through his freshman year at Northeast (or is it Southeast?) Missouri State College;  a man who ducked serving his country in the military; a man who is a serial divorcee; a doper; a multi-faceted bigot; a shameless liar!

Report this

By JEP, August 3, 2007 at 10:00 am #

“I find it chilling that reactionary windbags like Limbaugh and O’Riley have such a large audience..”

Do you actually believe those numbers?

Book-cookers have an amazing way of inflating their numbers.

Remember Rove’s “I’ve got my numbers, you’ve got yours” prognostications…

Clearly, someone fooled the boy-genius Karl.

Maybe they are fooling all of us about their ratings, too…

Report this

By JEP, August 3, 2007 at 9:52 am #

“He deserves major credit for the Republicans’ 1994 landslide.”

Just as he deserves major credit for winning Missouri for Claire McCaskill, when he trashed Michael Fox so callously.

But, actually, E.J., Limbaugh was more a symptom of our cultural division, than he was a progenitor of it. It was like a chicken-egg conundrum, Rush was more an opportunist than he was a mover and shaker.

He took his talking points from others, and just juiced them up with his personal brand of vitriole, which was his only real tool.

Logic and reason were never part of his influence, he depended on blind ignorance and negativism for his success.

Not a very worthy resume, in the history of journalism. No one can even name a single worth program he has honestly supported, his entire schtick is hate.

And the copycats like O’Rielly, Hannity, Coulter, Drudge, Malkin, Borscht, and now Beck The Feckless, all subscribe to the same hatefulness to keep theri ratings up.

Rush is not powerful, hatefulness is. He’s a big wimpy chickenhawk who hides behind his microphone. Rush would wet his trousers if he ever had to face someone like John Edwards or Chris Dodd in a serious debate.

Rush was just willing to personify that evil hatefulness, more than any other hack in the media, so now people attribute his success to some quality of character on his part, and it was his very lack of any quality of character that gave him his delusions in the first place. And his oxycontin addiction and McNab bigotry only proved his ultimate hypocrisy.

Now that he’s contributed so mightily to the Democrats’ majority in Congress, no one whould be bragging about his influence creds. Like Beck, he’s a joke, to anyone with an IQ over 80.

Report this

By Ed, August 3, 2007 at 8:12 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I find it chilling that reactionary windbags like Limbaugh and O’Riley have such a large audience but it speaks volumes about the collective American intellect and why the voters gave a blatantly corrupt administration a second term in 2004.

Report this

By Skruff, August 3, 2007 at 5:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

What’s this thing with Greek-American Liberals:

Mike Dukakis
George Soros
Markos Zúniga

Looks like it might be a trend.

Report this

By KISS, August 3, 2007 at 5:32 am #

It is tough to shut down a moron like Limbaugh when the media is owned by a few neo-conservatives. With radio in the hands of 3-4 big shots, and advertisers only using these stations; remember Americans don’t read, they listen or watch the Telly. So newspapers were ineffective for liberals or moderates and books were out of the question. Lucky for thinking persons the Internet came along and the Bush-ites are trying to cut it up. So far the Internet and Google allow people to ferret out the truth and see how outlandish and uncreditable O Reilly, and Limbaugh really are. These two really do define the word Blow-Hards.

Report this

By Outraged, August 3, 2007 at 3:18 am #

Limbaugh is an ass of the highest order.  In case you haven’t seen this “interpretation” check out:

http://www.bushflash.com/animation.html

It’s great!

Report this

By P. T., August 2, 2007 at 10:24 pm #

The best thing that happened to handle Limbaugh was when some of his critics started documenting and publicizing his lies.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.