![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Murdoch’s Minions Smear BloggersPosted on Jul 25, 2007By Joe Conason Not so long ago, the Republican right expected to dominate American politics for generations to come. Karl Rove, “boy genius” of the GOP, believed that his generation had achieved a partisan realignment that would overturn the progressive achievements of the past century. Now those confident predictions have crashed with the failure of George W. Bush and the rise of a new progressive politics powered by the Internet. What traditional pundits once dismissed as the unwashed peasantry of the blogosphere has risen up to donate millions of dollars, elect Democratic candidates and demand real change. Having inflicted a terrible defeat on the Republicans last year, the “netroots” progressives are preparing to achieve historic victories in 2008. Naturally, the would-be bullies of the right have not taken this development very well. As reactionaries tend to do, they have reacted with anger and attempted intimidation. Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News Channel has mounted a crusade against DailyKos.com, the largest progressive political website, and YearlyKos, the site’s annual blogger convention, which will take place in Chicago next month. On his nightly broadcast, Fox News sage Bill O’Reilly charged that the proprietors of Daily Kos are “hatemongers” like the Ku Klux Klan or the Nazis—and targeted JetBlue for serving as the official airline of YearlyKos. O’Reilly’s ranting and raving frightened the JetBlue suits into withdrawing their sponsorship. Then came Weekly Standard Editor William Kristol, another Murdoch minion, who tried to frighten the Democrats away from Daily Kos. “Every Democratic presidential nominee is going to the Daily Kos convention,” he sniffed. “That’s the left-wing blogger who was not respectable three or four years ago. ... Now the whole party is going to pay court to him and to left-wing blogs.” Clearly he meant to warn that the Democrats would suffer from their association with those disreputable leftists—and that the netroots are a fringe, extremist element. The most obvious answer is to urge them both to look in the mirror. To listen to O’Reilly—who has publicly urged the destruction of San Francisco and Iran, in addition to making thousands of other equally charming remarks—is to hear corrosive hatred distilled into a nightly dose of poison. The occasional outburst on a liberal blog, almost always in the anonymous comments section, cannot compare with the daily outpouring of vitriol on Fox. As for Kristol, he is in no position to accuse anyone else of extremism. His chief allies have long been among the theocratic evangelical rightists. For years he has provided the worst possible advice to the Republicans, habitually promoting divisive and violent policies. During the Clinton administration, he led the drive for impeachment, urging the congressional majority to ignore public disapproval. This stupidity led to a Republican rout in the 1998 midterm election. Having failed to learn that lesson, the Republicans listened to Kristol’s intense advocacy of invading Iraq, back when he assured everyone that war would be easy and fun and that any talk of Shiite-Sunni conflict was mere “pop sociology.” Liberals can only hope that crackpots like him maintain their influence over the Republicans for a few more years, reducing the right-wing party to a permanent minority. But are the bloggers somewhere on the opposite extreme? For those who have yet to make his acquaintance, the creator of Daily Kos is Markos Moulitsas—a U.S. Army veteran of Salvadoran and Greek extraction who grew up in the Midwest and now lives in the Bay Area with his wife and two children. He is a business entrepreneur and a serious sports fan. He also happens to be a liberal Democrat with a determination to win and occasionally a hot temper. He and the other leading voices in the netroots seek a Democratic politics that is both pragmatic and principled. Antiwar, but certainly not anti-military, they have fostered alliances with veterans of Iraq. They avoid rigidity, dislike identity politics and apply few litmus tests. In 2006 the bloggers raised money for many of the Democrats deemed “conservative” by the Washington press corps. In truth, the bloggers share the values of most Americans, who also want to end the war in Iraq, establish universal health insurance, reduce global warming, increase the minimum wage and preserve Social Security. It is the ideologues such as O’Reilly and Kristol whose opposition to those values locates them on the fringe, despite their loud megaphones and corporate backing. And what the Murdoch bullies prove whenever they try to stigmatize the citizen bloggers is just how much they fear a fair (and balanced) fight. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. TAGS:
|
By Dan Uu Noel, August 1, 2007 at 11:06 pm #
This article is factually correct, but misses the real issue that afflicts the U.S. government, namely how there can be some fit between it and the religious right. The true problem is that the Bush administration’s infusion of arrogance, incompetence and hypocrisy into the federal bureaucracy has hardly encountered resistance, such as massive protests, denunciations, resignations, whistle-blowing, etc.
The true problem is that the large majority of federal public servants have been somehow cowed into forgetting about their mission of serving “us the people” and focus instead on avoiding waves while awaiting their cushy retirement. This has been one major factor behind the persistence of the 9/11 myth for all these years.
An deep reform of the U.S. government is vitally needed, starting with a huge purge. But the democrats don’t seem up such a fundamental; all indications so far are that they just want to nudge government action more towards people and less towards dumb religion or well-connected business entities.
Love,
Report thisBy Shag, August 1, 2007 at 10:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Joe,
Report thisI missed not having you on Al Franken’s old show, every Friday. You are right on with your comments, but we need to challenge these clowns at every turn.
Listening to Bill Press’ show this morn, a caller told of a lady who email Loews stores and complained of vitriol and hatred on Fake News. Loews wrote her and said they won’t advertise on those shows any more.
I hear of this momentum starting and hoping it snowballs. If they can harass Jetblue, we absolutely must turn it back on them. We have to.
By Douglas Chalmers, August 1, 2007 at 3:32 pm #
91365 by mary on 8/01 at 7:19 am: “... I never thought Republicans were the enemy of democracy until now. Of course I also felt sure the Democratic Party was sophisticated enough to put up their own candidate that would just trounce this actor…guess I was just young and naive….”
I guess there is really only room for one right-wing political party in any country in the end. But then, that’s part of the illusory game of democracy - a two-headed talking monster!
Report thisBy mary, August 1, 2007 at 11:19 am #
Although I myself have always been a Democrat, My circle of family and friends is balanced with opinions on both sides of the issues. I never thought Republicans were the enemy of democracy until now. Shame on any baby boomer who lost family and friends to the Viet Nam conflict and still voted for GWB! I don’t need to go into any detail, you know exactly what I mean! It wasn’t until Ronald Regan’s re-election did I realize just how much trouble middle class Americans were in. I remember thinking voters will never re-elect this moron, especially after not just firing the air traffic controllers, but preventing them from holding any federal job, and the most hypocritical tax of all when he went after tips paid to waiters while pounding the desk favoring tax cuts for the rich and dribble down economics. Of course I also felt sure the Democratic Party was sophisticated enough to put up their own candidate that would just trounce this actor…guess I was just young and naive. Let’s hope we all learned our lessons, ask hard questions and demand straight answers or we’re going to lose this fight.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 30, 2007 at 6:51 pm #
Per Skruff, “Ideas and People like Bill O’Reilly and his puppet master Ruppert Murdoch must be challenged at every juncture.”
Well, said.
Report thisBy blafo, July 30, 2007 at 3:53 pm #
It’s probably a good idea not to get too caught up in a whining war of over who’s being meaner to whom.
The main thing is for progressives, liberals, moderates, and sane people generally to continue pounding issues that have always been fundamental to American democracy and supported by a numerical majority, but have been severely undermined by the facist right, namely freedom from poverty (including unnecessary physical suffering), equal opportunity, non-discrimination, and the civic duty of the wealthy to “give back” to those who made them wealthy.
You can be sure that Jet Blue’s abandoning of Daily Kos had nothing to do with their agreeing with O’reilly’s mouth diarrhea but everything to do with subtle and behind the scenes financial threats from his oligarchic majesty r.m.
Report thisBy Skruff, July 29, 2007 at 10:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
90170 by THOMAS BILLIS on 7/27 at 2:47 pm
”...Joe you wasted a column.The best thing that can happen to the liberals is having these guys continue their insane rants….Let them rant unchallenged Joe they are just making of fools of themselves.”
Unfortunately, while I agree with the thrust of your sentiments, I am force to remember my Grandmother, a well educated Jewish professional woman who became a victim of foolish ranting Nazis!
Ideas and People like Bill OReilly and his puppetmaster Rupert Murdoch must be challenged at every juncture.
I do not consider myself a “liberal” so maybe that is why we have this “disconnect” but with the right events and climate, these people can become dangerous…. even VERY dangerous.
Report thisBy Len Hart, July 28, 2007 at 6:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’ve already been “criticized” by the Heritage Foundation for my blog article entitled “Terrorism is Worse Under GOP Regimes”. But I was insulted by how lame their attack was. Having had considerable experience dealing with the rabid right, I felt downright slighted. Nevertheless, I wrote another article in which I dissected their critique. Terrorism IS always worse under GOP regimes. I don’t think ‘they’ liked my common sense explanation.
Clue: the GOP is not a political party. It’s a kooky cult.
Report thisBy Aanya, July 28, 2007 at 6:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As we were going through the 2000 election, and all the controversy that it generated, the 2004 election was a nightmare. By the time we were approching the Bush re-election, I know that many, many of us believed we had lost out country, or possibly our countrymen had lost their minds. It was in the year before the 2004 election that I discovered the blogs. It was only at that discovery, I knew I wasn’t imagining what was going on. There were nearly half the country who was seeing what I saw. Since the first day with my first blog, I connect daily, many times daily, to make sure Markos, Atrios, Jane, Trex, Christy, John Amato, Digby, everyone at Americablog etc. etc. etc. As long as they are all in the right places, I go on for another day. Fox, Rupert Murdoch nor O’Reilly, Hannity or Bush/Cheney will ever control my “mind”! We are huge in numbers, and a force to deal with. We want out country back, and we will get our country back.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 28, 2007 at 12:47 pm #
Thomas, I apologize for misreading your post. Mea culpa! By the way, while I try to be earnest, there is no “a” in the name Ernest.
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, July 28, 2007 at 2:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Earnest Canning 90246 first of all that is Billis.Secondly my point was that it is good for the left of which I am a proud member to let these morons rant unabated.The broomstick part of the Coulter reference should have given you a clue that I am not a big fan SS Major Coulter.Riding on a broomstick generally conotes a witch.I do not mind being abused for I what believe but not for what I do not believe.
Report thisBy JPark, July 28, 2007 at 12:53 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Every Democratic presidential nominee is going to the Daily Kos convention, he sniffed. Thats the left-wing blogger who was not respectable three or four years ago. ...
Says the guy who never should have been “respectable”. I will not be happy until every right wing neocon scumbag like Kristol is in stocks on Wisconsin Ave.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, July 27, 2007 at 11:34 pm #
#89814 by Ernest Canning on 7/26 at 2:31 pm: “...What really scares the folks at the Faux News propaganda network is not progressive bloggers but truth….”
They don’t get paid for truth and the truth doesn’t interest them in the agenda they want their favorite political party to tout.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 27, 2007 at 11:08 pm #
Oh, this is great. Thomas Billips worships America’s Eva Braun aka Ann Coulter, then mumbles about “insane liberals.” Priceless!
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, July 27, 2007 at 6:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Joe you wasted a column.The best thing that can happen to the liberals is having these guys continue their insane rants.The other best thing for liberals is the pin up girl of the extreme right Ann Coulter.I actually have a pin up of her on her brand new broomstick.Let them rant unchallenged Joe they are just making of fools of themselves.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, July 27, 2007 at 12:43 am #
One reason that Faux News gets viewers. Surfing through channels looking for some serious stories, usually you have MSN doing another crime/prison story, and CNN doing another celebrity gossip storey. Then you hit Faux, and superficially it looks like a serious story.
Of course ever since they tried the blatant pre-election smear -of changing Rep Foley’s affiliation to Democrat, I have maintained a complete boycott of their station. In the good old days when I grew up, such blatant dishonesty would have had the FCC revoking their license, but apparently we no longer live in the good old days.
Report thisBy felicity, July 26, 2007 at 7:51 pm #
Keep ‘em screaming. It’s the best indicator that the great unwashed out here are scaring the shit out of ‘em. Fear is the name of the win-game in Yankee land these days.
Report thisBy DASM, July 26, 2007 at 6:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Fox “News” is not a news station. They do not present news, they take stories, twist them, and attack, attack, attack. Any story can become a hate-filled attack on anything that does not support Bush and radical right wing ideas. Often if a guest presents a different idea, they are screamed at, interrupted, and on several occasions (O’Reilly is an expert at this) the guest’s mike is turned off! Totally unprofessional. Tune in to other news shows and you see news items presented, not always perfectly, not always well, but at least the presentation does not include a hateful verbal attack every time, every night, and guests mikes are not turned off. The so-called “journalists” at Fox disgrace the term journalism.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 26, 2007 at 6:31 pm #
What really scares the folks at the Faux News propaganda network is not progressive bloggers but truth. It is amusing that, to the immediate right of this post, one finds an ad for “three conservative books” at a buck a piece, with photos of “Culture Warrior” by Bill O’Reilly, “Winning the Future” by Newt Gingrich, “Let Freedom Ring” by Sean Hannity, and “Godless” by Ann Coulter, aka America’s Eva Braun. How many of the 26% of Americans who are still taken in by these fascists do they really think they will find at a site like “Truth”-dig? The hard-right is so desparate to delude us, perhaps they will soon turn to offering to pay us a buck for each one of their screeds we agree to read.
Report thisBy Mudwollow, July 26, 2007 at 5:50 pm #
Sure, Billy Crystal and ipecac are synonymous but it’s way premature for progressives to begin patting themselves on the back about anything.
Karl Rove, boy genius of the GOP, believed that his generation had achieved a partisan realignment that would overturn the progressive achievements of the past century.
Seems Karl has a lot to gloat about. Maybe the Nazi right hasn’t gotten everything they wanted, but they’ve certainly turned the clock back several decades.
When George and Dick and Rummy and so many more are impeached and/or behind bars, it will be time for some libations. Until then, please postpone progressives self congratulations.
Report thisBy Hammo, July 26, 2007 at 5:26 pm #
Not too long ago, I read that Rupert Murdoch had given money/support to Hillary Clinton. That is food for thought.
Conason notes that the Web has changed politics. It has also obviously changed access to information, communication, social psychology and other aspects of our life in very significant ways.
The grass-roots nature of the internet, as Conason’s article indicates, has changed the situation in not only American society, but global society.
Related to many of these developments, attempts to “dumb down” Americans and people globally are not going to be successful. Just the opposite. Grass-roots people are getting more intelligence.
An article that touches on these ideas is ...
Dumbing down of Americans may not be working
PopulistAmerica.com (Populist Party of America)
June 14, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/dumbing_down_of_amer icans_may_not_be_working
Report thisBy Erica, July 26, 2007 at 4:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I wish they wouldn’t waste their time dealing with needless arguings and smearing of other people’s names and focuse on real issues at hand. There are countless problems in the world that should be America’s concern like Global Poverty. According to the Borgen Project, corporate leaders believe that the impoverished community in the world is the largest untapped consumer market.
Report thisBy PaulMagillSmith, July 26, 2007 at 4:31 pm #
This comes from this link and I think it is appropriate here:
http://www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/background.htm
The structures of media seem corrupted top to bottom. The former president of CBS News Richard Salent said, “Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.” John Swinton, the former New York Times Chief of Staff, whom colleagues named “The Dean of His Profession”, confessed candidly before the New York Press Club: “I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to writehonest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job [ ] We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes.”
The media, reduced to a handful of conglomerates by deregulation, mold publics minds, profoundly affecting interpretation of reality. The largest conglomerates are growing even bigger by consuming competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. With the consolidation of the media empires, TV stations, newspapers and radio broadcasting are no longer independent. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporters. The rest must depend on the chains for all of national and international news. It is also unsettling that one ethnic group dominates North American media ownership and staff, without reflecting the ethnic profiles of big business owners, officers and employees. The group refutes criticisms by intimidating the critic, based on historical prosecution of a radical part of the ethnic group [The National Alliance, 2002].
TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures speak with a single voice, reinforcing each other. Despite apparent diversity, there are no alternative sources of information. The most prestigious and influential newspapers in the USA, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post illustrate the ability of the media masters to use the press as an unopposed instrument of policy. The papers set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others, and originate the news for the others to copy. In a joint venture with the New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world.
Report thisBy fedup&40ish, July 26, 2007 at 3:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Let me get this straight: some raving lunatic jackass who used to anchor a fourth-rate tabloid gossip show and who now routinely trashes anyone who dares disagree with his far-right puppetmasters dares to call progressive bloggers hatemongers? This is the same man who admires Ann Coulter, whose level of hatred for much of the human race drives her to a bizarrely girlish megalomania. These are also the same people who claimed the Clintons were drug dealers and murderers, the same people who trashed Al Gore, John Kerry and John Edwards, as well as anyone else who tries to challenge their junta. I refuse to let O’Reilly’s countenance dishonor any of my TVs, despite my partner’s insistence she has to watch him to get a feel for the enemy.
Report thisBy Che, July 26, 2007 at 3:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Your all living a socialist dream. I’d be willing to believe that you are all, out-of-work, entitlement loving, Hugo chavez fans.
Report thisBut, its has been said, even a blind squirrel eventually finds a nut and when the Dems get control in 08, the country will be wishing they hadnt. So…...enjoy your shortlived success.
By Douglas Chalmers, July 26, 2007 at 1:25 pm #
Quote: “...the Republican right expected to dominate American politics for generations to come. Karl Rove, “boy genius”....’
Duh, these guys sure have a short half-life!
What happened with Murdoch, though, Has someone in the Democrats not paid sufficient homage to him (in making after-election promises)??? He used to support the far right - now it sounds like he is appealing to the extreme right - from Neocon to Nazi!?!? of course, the proprietors of TruthDig are “hatemongers” too, ha ha!
Endlessly splitting the uSA between right and left wing ideologies is superficial but increasingly negative. One the real economic and climate-change problems start overtaking evryone, it could get quite serious. Unity will have been squandered along with the national wealth, etc etc. The housing crisis is just a start…..
Report thisBy darryl, July 26, 2007 at 1:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
o’reilly is a nazi pig
Report thisBy Scott, July 26, 2007 at 11:49 am #
Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same coin. Society is actually polarized between those who govern and those who are governed.
The only question that really matters is, who are you with?
Aim Big Brother’s telescreens the other way. Hardwire the government to the Internet, now, before its to late.
Report thisBy samuel burke, July 26, 2007 at 10:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
the netroots needs to target the advertisers of bill oreillys’ show and anywhere that the neocons appear…lets fight back with phone calls to their advertisers en masse. If anyone knows of a website where this campaign is being mounted please let me know…we need a list of advertisers who can be targeted by the netroots crowd who otherwise will be largely unknown, since all we do is read the web and or maybe call our representatives in congress over and over…we need to let our numbers be directed as a force for the sake of our constitution.
i have always voted republican, but this year i am preparing to vote for any candidate who stands up to the middle east situation and calls a spade by it’s proper name…thank God for ron paul…i hope he at least gets the debate heading in the right direction.
Report thisBy weather, July 26, 2007 at 9:57 am #
The meek will inherit this Earth Kristol, you and your defective ilk are irrelevent.
Report thisIm a 3rd. gen. Republican ashamed of it today - you don’t speak for me at all.
By Marjorie L. Swanson, July 26, 2007 at 9:50 am #
Right on as usual Joe.
Report thisBy ardee, July 26, 2007 at 8:29 am #
Does anyone feign surprise at the tactics of the right, especially after they have been so long in use, and equally long ignored by Democrats to their detriment?
I heard Democrats moaning and groaning , wringing their hands while they were in the six year minority. Now that they are a majority, however slim, they wring their hands, moan and groan and do nothing much.
Now I hasten to add that the various investigations may indeed bear fruit in the future, yet might not one expect the same attacks and villifications regarding uncovered truths that seems to work unfailingly every damn time? One can only speculate as to why Democrats seem powerless to counter the ravings of O’Reilly, the distortions and drug induced nonsense of Limbaugh, but powerless they seem.
Report thisBy susanai, July 26, 2007 at 4:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I watch O’Reilly often. I mostly come away feeling slightly sullied, but not knowing why. Do they use subliminals?
Report thisI cannot understand how it is the highest rating channel. Isuppose if you voted Bush in you deserve Fox.