![]() |
|
||
|
Birth Control Is BackPosted on Jul 17, 2007By Marie Cocco Birth control is back. Not that it ever went away, despite the ardor with which conservative culture warriors have pushed their antediluvian attitudes about women and sex—and notwithstanding the official sanction the Bush administration has given this retro-think. Barr Pharmaceuticals, maker of the Plan B morning-after contraceptive pill, estimates that sales doubled since the Food and Drug Administration approved over-the-counter sale of the product after a long, politically inspired delay. Opponents had argued that the pill is tantamount to abortion—which it is not. A woman takes the medication after unprotected sex, and it works like a high dose of birth control pills. Plan B brought in $40 million annually when it was available by prescription only, according to Barr spokeswoman Carol Cox. The company estimates that sales this year, which marked the start of marketing without a prescription to women 18 and older, will reach $80 million. More teenagers who have sex, meanwhile, are using condoms—63 percent used a condom during their last sexual intercourse, according to data compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics. That’s up from 46 percent of sexually active high school students who reported using condoms in 1991. Progress in reducing the rate of births to teenage mothers has held steady since the 1990s. So fewer girls are becoming mothers before they are emotionally and financially ready—and fewer babies are born burdened by the toxic mix of poverty and social stress related to teenage parenting. It turns out that protecting ourselves against unwanted pregnancies never went out of style. Not even after years in which anti-abortion activists tried to restrict women’s access to birth control with faith-based rhetoric that draws a link between abortion and contraception—though the only connection is that the failure to use birth control leads to more unwanted pregnancies and more abortions. Not even after the Bush administration’s unrelenting war on science, a crusade that includes showering unprecedented amounts of federal dollars on abstinence-only sex education. The programs have been found to have no effect in inspiring teenagers to delay having sex, have fewer sexual partners or abstain from sex altogether. Advertisement Still, half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended and half of those end in abortion. The U.S. rate of teen births is still the highest in the industrialized world—it’s about twice as high as the rate in Canada and about seven times higher than teen birthrates in such countries as Japan, Denmark and Sweden, according to the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Nearly a third of American girls and young women will get pregnant at least once before they reach 20. “The problem is that we’re acting like this isn’t a problem, and it certainly is,” says Jessica Sheets, a spokeswoman for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Washington continues to promote what doesn’t work. A House appropriations panel recently approved a 25 percent hike in funding for abstinence-only sex education programs, despite a Democratic takeover of Congress that was supposed to bring some sanity—and science—back into the sex-ed discussion. Congressional leaders have said they included the increase to assure a smoother political course for a measure that also contains funding for a broad range of health, education and labor programs. It was political expedience, not science, that led the FDA to approve the nonprescription sale of the morning-after pill only for adults. There’s no medical reason why sexually active teenage girls should not take it. And there’s every reason to think they would benefit most from it, since impulsive teens are more likely to have unprotected sex than are adults. “We are always on the side of protecting yourself,” says Sheets, who adds that the pregnancy campaign’s new interactive website for teenagers is likely to include information about the morning-after pill. “It’s 100 times better than getting pregnant at 14.” Splitting the difference is the route to political compromise. But Solomon knew well he could not split the biblical baby in two. No middle ground that imposes ideology on medical science is fair to women and girls. Because after all, there’s no such thing as being half pregnant. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at symbol)washpost.com. (c) 2007, Washington Post Writers Group Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By MAN, July 19, 2007 at 2:51 pm #
Here is a link intelligently designed to make the children really blink!
http://home.comcast.net/~ifcj/Inspirations.html
Report thisBy MAN, July 19, 2007 at 2:45 pm #
See this explaination:
Report thishttp://home.comcast.net/~ifcj/Inspirations.html
By THOMAS BILLIS, July 19, 2007 at 11:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The approach of abstinence is the last bastion of old people who do not have sex regularly.If you think you can promote abstinence among teen agers I have some swamp land you might be interested in.It would be like trying to stop Republicans from using hookers.I sense a ploy here with these religious fanatics.If everybody is having sex in their teenage years there will be no virgins to sacrifice in some religious ceremony.
Report thisBy Pavane, July 19, 2007 at 5:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I just saw Tom Delay (on video) say to the College Republicans Convention that ... ‘if the 40 million babies who have been aborted were alive today, we would not need immigration labor.’ So. Apparently, Republicans do not care about life ... they just want a good force of toilet cleaners and cabbage pickers. And American ones at that. Ahhh, I get it now.
Report thisBy Marshall, July 19, 2007 at 4:59 am #
I believe the author of this article is wrong. The US teen pregnancy rate is down to 21 per 1000. The UK is at 30 per 1000 - robbing the US of its first place ranking.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 19, 2007 at 12:17 am #
Comment#87875 by RAE on 7/18 at 7:47 pm
RAE, THIS is the $64 trillion question:
....“How did this issue ever become the right of the public to decide.”....
I’ve been asking it myself, for close to 30 years now. How exactly did a medical procedure or medication prescription, between a patient and a physician (or other medical care provider) get to be a PUBLIC ISSUE? I thought Roe v. Wade fixed it, for once and for all.
NOW look….things are truly jacked-UP!!!
We’ve got all of these crazy ideologues that pass as medical professionals in parts of the country, who simply REFUSE to “despense” or REFUSE to provide any family planning services or referrals, just because of their “beliefs”. And, these are men and women.
Can’t tell me everybody hasn’t lost their minds, when there has NEVER been a reason for such a thing to be a “public” issue.
Report thisBy RAE, July 18, 2007 at 11:47 pm #
ANY woman, for ANY reason, who wants an abortion will likely find a way (safely or not) to have it whether or not the law or anyone else agrees with her decision.
And I fully support her right to do so.
It is her body, her pregnancy, her future that is at stake, NOT YOURS, anyone else’s or, for certain, the public’s. How did this issue ever become the right of the public to decide?
NOT to become pregnant in the first place would obviously be the BEST situation, but if, for whatever reason this is no longer an option, then any route the woman chooses to take is HER BUSINESS and HERS ALONE.
Everyone else should just BUTT OUT. If you don’t agree with her and me, TOO DAMN BAD. Just don’t get an abortion yourself - that’s as far as your control goes. Period (hopefully).
Report thisBy cyrena, July 18, 2007 at 10:15 pm #
Comment#87699 by Margaret Currey on 7/18 at 9:23 am
....“I commented I ate before I met you and I will eat when I leave you.”...
Margaret, this reminds me of that old blues song from back in the day….
~ I can do BAD by myself; I don’t need no help, from nobody else.~ (not only that, but I might just do even BETTER, if I get the hell away from YOU) Needless-to-say, I embellished the part in parentheses, although I have been known to say that a time or two.
Anyway, youre right. The American socio-political system is still highly patriarchal, and its annoying, especially when things are so messed up, and somebody needs to fix things, and theyre doing their best to keep us from getting the work done.
But, were gonna keep this part of your message in mind:
But what the powers that be do not realize is that woman are stronger than men, they just need to realize it.
Now actually, there are a whole bunch of smart guys, that already KNOW this. But youre right, the women need to know it as well.
~B~ I truly understand about those paraplegic camels and all of that straw.
Report thisBy Stephen, July 18, 2007 at 7:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
My rememberance is that “David” as a child’ did “Split” the Baby in two. The name of the big woman was ...let me see..“Goliath” the Palistinian’ no “phallus-tinian” Yes.
Report thisBy mike, July 18, 2007 at 7:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
These are the the people who believe do as I say not as I do. Its ok when they go out and have sex outside of marriage or homosexual sex. And its these elites that have the money to get their girls abortions when the poor cannot.
Report thisBy Margaret Currey, July 18, 2007 at 1:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
There is a comcept, “Keep im pregant and barefoot, the administration is surely anti-women, if women gets pregnant young, then she stops school, stops education, keeps poor, keeps ignorant as to what is going on in the world, her self worth is lowered, the administration has won in keeping woman down.
Once I was in a relationship that was in a self destruct area, the man said if I want to keep you out of clothes and shoes I will, I commented “I ate before I met you and I will eat when I leave you.
And I did leave, and it took some time to get the education I lacked, it is very difficult to go to school and work and take care of a child.
But what the powers that be do not realize is that woman are stronger than men, they just need to realize it.
Report thisBy ~B~, July 18, 2007 at 11:34 am #
I am told time and time again by various members of society that positive change will come. Some issue will be the straw that broke the camels back.
I see so many straws and parapalegic camels I wonder which straw and which camel?
Women’s Rights - Civil Rights - Human Rights - Myriad Wars - Rampant Corruption - Massive Debt - Looming Scandal - Torture - Civil Spying - Religious Crap (in sex, education, science, law, policy) - Economic Slavery - Immigration Invasion - Free Trade - Food Safety - Black Ops (around the world) - “Freedom of Speech Zones”
Looks like a bale of straw to me. These are just a few of the issues as well. I think the assault is intentionally all encompassing. They get away with murder while the population is stunned stupid (America’s new favorite pastime).
“Ive never figured out how it is that the SAME people who object so vehemently to birth control in any of its forms, (other than abstinence, and I just dont think thats EVER worked, in the history of man/woman kind)are the very SAME ones who dont want any of the finacial or civic responsibility for caring for these children, and their teenage mothers, or even their adult parents that simply CANNOT afford, for one reason or another, to bring another child into the world.”
Cyrena this beast (known as logic) has never been very well attended to in Washington. Sadly…
B
http://b-political.blogspot.com/
Report thisBy KISS, July 18, 2007 at 9:49 am #
It’s all about ignorance, control and hypocrisy. When preaching abstinence they boo-hoo science, yet when confronted with a life-threatening disease they run to science as fast as they can. Keeping a girl, of age, a virgin is without reason or rationality. Preventing pregnancy should be of the utmost concern. Why bring an unwanted child into the world? Abortion is a terrible way to exercise birth control, this doesn’t not mean I am against abortion, I support the procedure but it should be used only for the purpose it is meant to do. Other means of birth control should be made available free of charge to any girl 15 years old and older through schools and planned parenthood facilities.
Report thisWith this administration science has been regulated to the back burner and a long time to remedy the superstition that now prevails.
By cyrena, July 18, 2007 at 5:28 am #
I appreciate the stats reflected here, because things have been looking REAL bad on this front…almost like we’ve been going backwards in the courts here. And, they did everything politically possible, to keep this medication off the market, and make it unavailable, just as they are doing their best to make abortion illegal.
I’ve never figured out how it is that the SAME people who object so vehemently to birth control in any of it’s forms, (other than abstinence, and I just don’t think that’s EVER worked, in the history of man/woman kind)are the very SAME ones who don’t want any of the finacial or civic responsibility for caring for these children, and their teenage mothers, or even their adult parents that simply CANNOT afford, for one reason or another, to bring another child into the world.
So, their is a whole bunch of hypocrisy in the anti-birth control, anti-science camp. And, it’s dangerous to the rest of society.
So, this is actually progress, but we’ve still got a long way to go. There is a very SERIOUS problem with teen births and infant mortality in some of our communities here. It’s been particularly awful in rural areas of Mississippi, where the population, (mostly African-American) are far from any kind of family planning services, and medical social workers are spread thinly.
Some of the local cultural and traditional sorts of mentalities prevent so many of these people from even being in the loop at all, for even the most basic sorts of things that the rest of us take for granted. So many of them NEVER get ANY pre-natal care, and their own health is semi-compromised to begin with, just because they often lack basic information for nutrition.
And, in that case, the problem is still very bad. Hopefully, we can get some of this modern technology to include them as well. All too often, they’ve been sort of forgotten and left out of the loop, which is why the teen mother and infant mortality rates is so abnormally high.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, July 18, 2007 at 1:37 am #
Ideology trumps mere facts anyday of the week. Twice on Sunday. No amount of scientific evidence will ever change these folks minds.
Report thisBy DennisD, July 17, 2007 at 11:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“So why does Washington continue to push abstinence-only sex education against all better scientific judgments?
Report thisEarth to Marie - have you looked to see just who we have, some say elected, in office running this country lately? The answer to my question answers yours.