|
|||
|
Phony Piety on the Far RightPosted on Jul 13, 2007By Joe Conason Among the most durable myths of American public life is that conservatives are more authentic in their religious faith than liberals and progressives. Certainly this arrogant presumption prevails on the religious right, where commentators and politicians routinely denigrate the sincerity of Christians such as Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, whose irredeemable sin is that they also happen to be Democrats and candidates for president. With characteristic condescension, an editor of the right-wing Weekly Standard dismissed public expressions of faith from the left as both pointless and worthless. He declared that the Democrats can only attract Christians who are “religious in the way that Hillary Clinton is religious, which is to say a very liberal Protestant sort of view, in which they believe in everything but God.” That quip is quite mild compared with typical fiery denunciations from the religious right, branding the Clintons as instruments of Satan and Obama as an Islamist in disguise. Both senators are fully capable of expressing their personal beliefs and defending their theological views whenever that seems appropriate. Like other presidential candidates on both sides of the partisan aisle, they can offer substantial evidence of their religiosity to churchgoing voters. Of course, that won’t discourage conservative critics from noisily denigrating them (and all Democrats) as apostates and heretics. In these endless squabbles over the faith of politicians, however, it is striking how rarely right-wing officials and preachers find themselves on the defensive about their faith—no matter how hypocritical and even hateful their behavior may be. These supposed men of God may be adulterers; they may be crooks and liars; they may cultivate the wealthy and corrupt while despising the poor and lame; yet somehow, their adherence to Scripture isn’t subject to doubt. It is time to stop being so damned polite—and to start asking them a few hard questions. Advertisement From the preeminent Pat Robertson of Christian Broadcasting Network to Paul Crouch of Trinity Broadcasting Network to lesser but rising figures such as Rod Parsley and John Hagee, these mountebanks persuade their hopeful viewers to send in checks, frequently promising that the Lord will bring prosperity to the poor and restore health to the ill if only those “tithes” are sufficiently generous. When the expected miracles fail to materialize, say the preachers, it is only because the faithful didn’t believe strongly enough—or didn’t donate enough money. Contributions are routinely misused to purchase luxury estates, private jets and lavish vacations in Vegas, rather than to propagate the Gospel in Asia or to relieve suffering in Africa, as advertised. Meanwhile, these fundamentalist shepherds promote hostility toward homosexuals, liberals, feminists and Muslims and toward Christians who don’t share their dogmas, all in the name of the Prince of Peace. They steer their followers toward right-wing ideology and Republican candidates, skirting or ignoring the laws that prohibit churches from engaging in partisan politics. They abhor Social Security, Medicare, national health insurance and every kind of government assistance to families, even while they eagerly cash in on “faith-based” federal handouts. Now presumably the faith healers and prosperity preachers can cite biblical verses to justify their dubious behavior, but it is hard to imagine that any of this is what Jesus would really do. Too many times in recent years the blustering enforcers of family values and public piety have turned out to be frauds. The unhappy examples range from Ralph Reed’s gambling connections and Newt Gingrich’s infidelities to Ted Haggard’s secret gay lifestyle. The latest episode involves Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), another conservative Christian moralist, whose name just turned up in the phone book of the “D.C. Madam.” (He once said that Bill Clinton deserved to be removed from office for his sexual infidelity, but now shows no sign of resigning his own seat.) When these Christian gentlemen are caught with their pants down or their hands in the cookie jar, they invariably claim that they have repented and prayed for forgiveness. In a spirit of generosity that they often lack, let us hope that they can cleanse themselves of wrongdoing. But let us remain skeptical whenever an ostentatiously pious conservative presumes to judge the faith of liberal Christians—including candidates for president. Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer. (c) 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Bush's Baffling Optimism Defies Harsh Reality in Iraq Next item: Scooter's Deal Is the American Dream CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Frank Cajon, July 19, 2007 at 10:30 pm Link to this comment
I haven’t had much to say on this because this is just a hypocrite who happens to be a GOP Senator. Where is the stop-the-presses news flash story in that? His kind are dime a dozen, like hypocrite Democrat Senators. He didn’t commit a felony or even a crime, send me the memo when we can indict him for something meaningful, so I can watch Gonzo’s people screw up the prosecution, then still nail him, and then have W pardon him, then have Gonzo purge prosecutor. Then refuse to tell the truth about it to Congress. Till then, I don’t even want to hear him get face time to tell the world about how he has been forgiven by his God. Who cares?
Report thisBy Skruff, July 19, 2007 at 4:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Theres a vast difference between posters on Truthdig and politicians and other public officials, wont you agree? It is this latter group to whom I was referring in my exhortation to be more forceful. With a scant few exceptions (only Jim Webb of Virginia comes to mind), Democratic public figures still mainly wither when presented with expressions of liberal stereotypes.
Long ago, the Clinton’s Gores, Robbs, and Bubba Nunn broke the mold of Democratic liberalism.
Paul Welstone was a “liberal”, Jay Rockefeller, Charlie Rangel, and Dennis Kucinich come closest to liberalism the Democratic Party is so far from “liberal” they couldn’t fly there even with congressional bonus miles.
Report thisBy zoya, July 19, 2007 at 2:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Well, it’s about bloody time—thanks, Joe! I never could understand why these charlatans get treated with all respect and seriousness by the mainstream media. They’re just more evidence of a decadent empire in decline.
Report thisBy scurvybro, July 19, 2007 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment
#87629 by Skruff on 7/18 at 4:57 am
(Unregistered commenter)
87545 by scurvybro on 7/17 at 4:56 pm
...the answer lies in liberals to stop being so damned polite.
I dont see it. Here on Truthdig it appears that SELF IDENTIFIED liberals & Conservatives are equally as rude and obnoxious. neither the left nor right has a lock on civility (my personal observation)
There’s a vast difference between posters on Truthdig and politicians and other public officials, won’t you agree? It is this latter group to whom I was referring in my exhortation to be more forceful. With a scant few exceptions (only Jim Webb of Virginia comes to mind), Democratic public figures still mainly wither when presented with expressions of liberal stereotypes.
Report thisBy morgan-lynn griggs lamberth, July 19, 2007 at 3:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
While I appreciate Jim Wallis’s efforts to get evangelicals to vote Democratic, as a naturalist, I prefer Paul Kurtz and Arthur Caplan’s humanistic ethics to guide America .We naturalists or just plain non-theists,need to make ourselves heard in this cacaphony of faith-braying.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 19, 2007 at 2:07 am Link to this comment
#87890 by carole on 7/18 at 8:50 pm
Actually carole, I know what you mean about the WP and Catholic thing, but in all honesty, Catholics have been all that “popular” among this group of “Christian’s” either. At least not for long. In not so distant times, Catholics were pretty much stepchildren of the “faith”, at least from the view of the WASP’s.
I think this is a whole new breed of phony piety types, since they’ve sort of all re-organized under a slightly different umbrella in the 21st Century.
Report thisBy carole, July 18, 2007 at 8:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It is a misnomer to call the so called “Christians” Christian. They are truly not Christian as evidenced by their behavior. Why do people not see through this White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant and Catholic hipocracy…As long as one can claim to be white, Protestant or Catholic; they feel they are superior to the rest of the folks in this USA (and world). Indeed, these people have shaken my faith as what a “Christian” should be. I am white and Protestant but do not consider what I believe and what these Christians believe in any way the same beliefs.
Report thisBy Shag, July 18, 2007 at 5:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Bravo, Joe. This message needs to sung from the hightest mountain. The numbers of these reichwing hypochrites and their vices is endless. An AirAmerica host once read a list of names of those one the Right, who gotten into trouble with sex, theft, lying, and it was astounding.
Report thisWhat amazes me is that, so many people need to be lead, that they will forsake their own needs, and follow the liars.
By cyrena, July 18, 2007 at 2:41 pm Link to this comment
Skruff:
‘I have lived an a bunch of states, and stayed in several Canadian provences. I have yet to find a place where there is no prostitution, and where that activity is not winked at by local authorities.’
You’re right Skruff, (about the prostitution). It is in fact one of the oldest professions on record, so I’ve always been for legalizing it. Just a lot safer, all the way around, and the owners of such establishments should pay taxes, and provide health and other coverage for it’s employees.
Report thisBy nf, July 18, 2007 at 2:17 pm Link to this comment
Brusays,
How poetic, makes me misty. Well said.
Report thisBy BruSays, July 18, 2007 at 2:04 pm Link to this comment
To Lloyd,
Ah, were it only that the highly organized, deeply political and brazenly biased religions of Judaisim, Islam and Christianity truly supported “simple faith and humility.”
They don’t, they won’t and they can’t and therefore they will continue to be subject to the empirical tests of verification of the senses. And rightly so.
Were it only so simple. Were it only that mankind could separate God from religion.
Report thisBy nf, July 18, 2007 at 1:51 pm Link to this comment
Hey Lloyd,
Have you talked to god in this deeper language ? Please tell me more. Vitter said he talked to him. Do you think Vitter’s fibbing ? Will you share the secret of communication with god ? Come on, we’re all friends here.
Report thisBy Goffredo, July 18, 2007 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment
Bravo Lloyd! Fantastic post!
Report thisThank you!
By nf, July 18, 2007 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment
The democrat party locked up the African-American vote, the teachers, the unions, the dis-enfranchised, most Jews, most Catholics and everyone else who wants something from the government (socialists). What was left for the republicans ? The religious freaks. That’s how we wind up with the Vitter’s of the world.
Report thisBy Lloyd L. Gordon, July 18, 2007 at 11:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
God doesn’t “belong” to any religion. He belongs to those who seek him out and have the conviction to overcome all odds to do so (e.g. cynics et. al.).
There’s not much to be said for God speaks in a deeper language then our words born of intellect (and arrogance) and whose criterion for validity is verification by the senses. Our senses are too gross to ever perceive the subtlity that is God; and he is obvious and easy to attain by simple faith, humility and the will to succeed despite ANY Test.
Those that claim they are “men of god” do so for their own self promotion; true “men of god” conceal this as one does with anything of great value.
Report thisBy dp, July 18, 2007 at 9:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Boy, this piece garnered a lot of postings! Yesterday, David Vitter apologized to his GOP collegues. So all is now well. What I can’t figure out is why this is being treated as just a terrible sin on Vitter’s part. Isn’t frequenting prostitutes a civil crime? Is he maybe using his religion to escape civil prosecution? Seems there’s a lot of that in the fundamentalist society. Boil it all down to “sins commited”, be absolved by a god of your choosing and then go about your perverse life as if nothing ever happened. That’s only if you have the unfortunate luck of getting caught “sinning”.
Report thisBy Skruff, July 18, 2007 at 4:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
87545 by scurvybro on 7/17 at 4:56 pm
“...the answer lies in liberals ‘to stop being so damned polite.’
I don’t see it. Here on Truthdig it appears that SELF IDENTIFIED liberals & Conservatives are equally as rude and obnoxious. neither the left nor right has a lock on civility (my personal observation)
Report thisBy Goffredo, July 17, 2007 at 6:00 pm Link to this comment
That’s funny stuff! I always dreamed of being a reporter on Arnold Schwarzenegger’s campaign for governor and asking him questions which would only be answered by lines from his movie. That would be fun. Living your life by only delivering movie quotes…
In order to keep us from violently revolting and/or crying out of despair from our government, we must never lose our sense of humor.
Report thisBy BruSays, July 17, 2007 at 5:28 pm Link to this comment
I suppose we’re all getting just a bit off-topic on Mr. Vitter’s but it has brought up some great one-liners and quotes:
“Religion is for people who dont want to go to hell for what theyre doing; spirituality is for those who have already been there for what they have already done.” Goffredo’s friend.
“Religion is the opium of the people” Karl Marx (though I think I learned it as, “Religion is the opiate of the masses.” Same thing, of course.
“All religions are failures. Every one of them.” ITW
“Religion is Man’s way of explaining the unexplainable; nothing more; nothing less.” Anonymous.
Moving right along….
I’ll never understand Bible Thumpers who attempt to confirm the validity of the Bible by quoting from it! Can you think of anything more absurd? Can you imagine if we conducted our entire lives with such insane reasoning?
To add to the insanity, virtually every religion claims itself as the ‘true’ word with the ‘true’ (and invariably) only path to salvation. Either just one of them’s right or they’re ALL wrong. I’ll vote the latter. Geezzzz….no wonder the world’s so screwed up!
Report thisBy scurvybro, July 17, 2007 at 4:56 pm Link to this comment
At times, stereotypes can function as a useful, if limited shorthand. They can be funny, too. However, their benign use is dependent on the speaker’s awareness of their limitations and his or her skill in expressing them.
Regrettably, stereotypes too often morph beyond broad caricature into conventional wisdom. This is what has happened to the terms “liberal” and “conservative” and, once again, I put much of the blame on our favorite usual suspect, the mainstream media.
How often do we hear or read journalists and commentators automatically ascribe qualities such as patriotism and religiosity to conservatives, while concepts such as amorality and America-bashing are assigned to liberals? It happens so often that there’s nothing exceptional about it. Such usage is entrenched as part of the vernacular, as well as the mindset. The latest example is Sirius radio’s labeling of its conservative and liberal offerings. Liberal programs fall under the rubric of “Sirius Left,” while conservative programming is called “Sirius Patriot.” No bias there, eh?
Change will not happen quickly, if at all. But if it is to happen, I agree with Mr. Conason that the answer lies in liberals “to stop being so damned polite.” More to the point, get pissed off. Shove it right back in their faces with pointed examples, and make them justify their lazy-ass assessments.
Yeah, I know they’ll try to dismiss us by saying we’re angry. So what? Explain that anger is the reasonable reaction a rational person would have to the outrages inflicted upon us for the past six-plus years. It’s not like we have much to lose by doing so.
Report thisBy nonsequitor, July 17, 2007 at 7:31 am Link to this comment
“Religion is the opium of the people” - KM
it’s a great racket. wish i had thought of it.
Report thisBy Jkoch, July 17, 2007 at 6:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Conservative churches have fewer divorces, alcoholism, or unwedded pregnancies. Better morality? No. The reason is that people with failed marriages, drinking problems, or unplanned pregnancies either leave such churches or conceal their past histories. Sometimes the clergy or elders get a “pass” for misconduct, provided they do not confuse Saturday with Sunday. A repentant sinner is one thing, but a sermon delivered under the influence of 100-proof spirits is something else.
Report thisBy WykydRed, July 17, 2007 at 4:07 am Link to this comment
ITW,
Cyrena has a point about “Western Religions”. However, those of us who are not “sticklers” for exacting points get your point. What you meant is simply “the three major world religions that infect Western civilization”. But if people come right out and say things like that, they’re called “prejudiced” or “a name caller”. And if you point out that the Middle East has produced the three most egregious horrors against humanity, society and human freedom, Islam, Judaism and Christianity, well, you’re asking for a shovel to the face by those who mouth platitudes of a “united world” and “tolerance”!
So, it’s just a matter of personal decision of how many shovels to the face you’re willing to take from people preaching a future Utopic world where we all get along and hold hands and sing or having the courage to simply be a “name-calling illiterate moron” because really, the people that insist you sound intelligent whilst being accurate tend to start up their steam rollers and head straight for you.
Personally, I kinda like putting my face right out there and saying, “You don’t scare me!” Because the harder they hit, the more they’re saying, “See?! It’s people like YOU that we have to get rid of before this world is perfect for the rest of us!” Because it is to laugh when tolerance is proven a tissue paper thin veneer for what truly lies beneath every human.
Some humans can manage true lifestyles of tolerance. But if you want to see the worst of humanity, walk around with a lit cigarette sometime. You’ll see these same “saints” suddenly become the most hateful, discrimanatory animals on the planet. Because EVERYONE needs an enemy to feel superior to. They will make the virulently religious look like some of the most tolerant people around!
So it’s not a bash on anyone! I’m just saying it’s a lose/lose situation anyway, so hey, spew forth as you like. The more accurate you are, the more they’ll hate you.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 17, 2007 at 3:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
cyrena on 7/16 at 8:52 pm
(381 comments total)
#87243 by Inherit The Wind on 7/16 at 9:43 am
ITW .
Not for the first time, have I agreed with the general foundation of your posts, even though I do sometimes have to question your logic. Still, this was one of your better posts, EXCEPT that you toss in statements like this:
Start with the three Western religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam
Now, just with that alone, you could discourage further reading, (at least by a purist), because Islam doesnt come even close to being a Western religion, and I wouldnt say that the roots of Judaism are Western either, though that might be argued by those who know Judaism far better than I. But to include Islam in what you are calling Western religions is like a major scholastic error, and is exactly the kind of thing that drives the animosity of the Islamic world. They are NOT a Western religion or other phenomena, and they have been adamantly rejecting what they see as the encroachment of the West upon their own cultures and traditions, and ways of life.
So, while I agree that most of these religious identities are meaningless, you just cant make statements like this, which are downright misleading and detract from the greater point that you are trying to make.
****************
Your phony “intellectualism” is getting annoying. You nit-pick words and don’t even do it logically.
Judaism, Christianity and Islam ARE Western religions. Judaism was widespread in Europe long before Christianity as Jews moved in with the Romans. Islam has been practiced in Central Europe for centuries—2 Persian friends were married in Virginia by a Hungarian mullah. In case you haven’t followed the news for the last 20 years, a LARGE faction in Yugoslavia was the Moslems. Turkey has been part of Europe for 2000 years—“Istanbul” is nothing more than a linguistic alteration of “Constantinople”—the heart of Orthodox Christianity.
Furthermore you ignore the blatantly obvious that all 3 religions are really branches of the same religion, worshiping the same God, the same patriarchs, with many of the same stories. Islam worships Jesus as a prophet, second only to Mohammed, and there’s a book of Mary in the Qu’ran.
And you miss the MOST obvious: Christianity is nothing more than a DIRECT offshoot of Judaism, beginning when a bunch of Jews decided that a particular rabbi, Yeshuah of Nazaret was the foreseen Moshiach—“The Anointed One” (“Christos” is Greek for “Anointed” as “Jesus” is Greek for Yeshuah). There are Christian sects that dispute mainstream Christian thought and believe that the ancient laws of Leviticus need to STILL be followed—that’s JEWISH Law!
Next you ignore the fact that our Western culture DIRECTLY grew out of the Middle East and the Mediterranean. All the cultures around the Med and Mesopotamia mixed and mingled for thousands of years—for example, the Greek myth of Phaeton tells how when Phaeton drove the Sun God’s chariot wildly, “The Nile went and hid his head”—so the ancient Greeks knew the Nile, and knew its source was a mystery. They also populated Sicily before Rome arose and many tales include that triangular Island, including The Odyssey.
So your supercillious and incorrect disputing my calling Judaism and Islam “Western” religions clearly shows your “scholarship” that you like to tout to be shoddy at best. To Eastern friends, the differences between Judaism, Christianity and Islam are so slight they are baffled by the conflicts between the 3. After all, Hinduism had a MAJOR offshoot when they had their equivalent of a “savior”, Sidhartha Guatama, who began a major spinnoff as well—Buddhism.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 16, 2007 at 8:52 pm Link to this comment
#87243 by Inherit The Wind on 7/16 at 9:43 am
ITW .
Not for the first time, have I agreed with the general foundation of your posts, even though I do sometimes have to question your logic. Still, this was one of your better posts, EXCEPT that you toss in statements like this:
Start with the three Western religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam
Now, just with that alone, you could discourage further reading, (at least by a purist), because Islam doesnt come even close to being a Western religion, and I wouldnt say that the roots of Judaism are Western either, though that might be argued by those who know Judaism far better than I. But to include Islam in what you are calling Western religions is like a major scholastic error, and is exactly the kind of thing that drives the animosity of the Islamic world. They are NOT a Western religion or other phenomena, and they have been adamantly rejecting what they see as the encroachment of the West upon their own cultures and traditions, and ways of life.
So, while I agree that most of these religious identities are meaningless, you just cant make statements like this, which are downright misleading and detract from the greater point that you are trying to make.
Report thisBy BobZ, July 16, 2007 at 7:56 pm Link to this comment
Well, we saw phony piety on display again today with Senator Vitter displaying his wife in order to bail him out. It amazes me once again how clowns like Vitter get elected in these red neck states. These guys expose Christian beliefs to ridicule with their hypocrisy. If this guy had any “values” he would have immediately resigned. But if he just keeps his mouth shut for the remainder of his term about the “sanctity of marriage”, that will be reward enough for us voters. What gets me is commentators like Tucker Carlson trying to make the media out like the bad guys. The media may have its faults but they love to cover hypocritical politicians. And it’s nice to again see Republicans squirm after they way they crucified Clinton for his sexual escapades. They deserve all of the spotlight that the media can shed on them.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 16, 2007 at 9:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
All religions are failures. Every one of them. They are all unable to successfully communicate what is and is not important in their “faith” and in life in general. Hypocracy is normal and typical, not rare and on the fringe. And, in all religions, the more religious people get, the more hypocritical they get.
Start with the three Western religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Devout believers can be people we admire: The Rebbe, Mother Theresa, Malcolm X. They can be just as devout and be despicable human beings: Baruch (the Tomb of the Patriarchs murderer), Torquemada, Osama Bin Laden.
Or among ordinary people: I meet Orthodox Jews who would do ANYTHING for other people, Jew or Gentile. I meet Orthodox who would cheat you in a New York minute. I meet Christians who would fight and die to prevent injustice. And then there are the Robertson/Falwell fascist crooks. I have met many Moslems who are devout and follow the 5 principles, including charity religiously (pun intended)—and then there are suicde bombers.
Hindus can produce a Gandhi—and the man who assassinated him.
Clearly, for such devout people to be at TOTALLY opposite ends of the spectrum is workable evidence that their religion is a failure. How can both get the same message?
If Jesus’ basic message is Love God, Love your fellows, how does that become Burn Heretics At The Stake and Get As Much Money As You Can?
If Mohammed taught the 5 Pillars, and taught that Jews and Christians are “incomplete” Moslems and the “People of The Scripture” how can suicide bombing against them happen?
If the 9th Commandment is “Do not covet your neighbor’s goods” how can Kyrias Joel justify setting up a system to rob the State of New York of tax dollars?
In case after case people claiming to be followers of the same religion have such vastly and diametrically opposite interpretations that the only thing they have in common is a name: Judaism. Christ. Mohammed. They aren’t merely on parallel tracks in the same direction, they go in opposite directions.
The emperor has no clothes. The fact that no religion can convince its followers to go EVEN ROUGHLY in the same direction (without force and threats of excommunication and execution) is prima facie evidence that they are all false.
Report thisBy Skruff, July 16, 2007 at 5:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
87176 by cyrena on 7/16 at 12:16 am:
“...but Louisiana is one of those kinds of states where its quasi-legal, if only because its been part of the culture there, from much earlier times.”
I have lived an a bunch of states, and stayed in several Canadian provences. I have yet to find a place where there is no prostitution, and where that activity is not “winked at” by local authorities.
Most folks do not consider New Jersey a “backward” State (except those living across the river) but I’ll wager they rank right up near the top when resident prostitutes are counted.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 16, 2007 at 12:16 am Link to this comment
Comment#87077 by Goffredo on 7/15 at 11:08 am
Goffredo, Your comment/question:
Again, the situation is rather syllogistic. Vitter frequented a prostitute. Prostitution is illegal. Vitter is a citizen of the United States of America. Therefore, he is subject to the penalty for breaking the law.
Am I off-base with this analysis?
Nope, you’re not off-base at all, except of course that you’re still going by things like “laws” and the violations thereof. Unfortunately, we haven’t operated under any legitimate legal system in the US for at least 7 years. It’s complete lawlessness.
Still, it’s good to know that some of us remember this whole concept of being a nation dictated by the rule of law, just so we’ll know how it’s SUPPOSED to work, if we ever get a chance to use it agaon.
Meantime, prostitution actually IS legal in at least one state, which would be Nevada. There may be others, but Louisiana is one of those kinds of states where it’s quasi-legal, if only because it’s been part of the culture there, from much earlier times. So, while it would indeed be “illegal” there, (as far as I know) it also is not particularly well enforced, in all areas of the state. That’s another one of those States that has a tendency to still have some backward laws, and they work on a slightly different scheudule for other bureaucratic type things as well.
So, seeing as that is where vitter is from, and seeing as he’s just another one of “those” types anyway, my guess is this wasn’t his first or second visit with a prostitute, and it won’t be his last. Maybe he’ll have to stick with the hometown ladies that don’t have such sophisticated and large operations. Far less chance of his name winding up in a phone book, and then requiring yet another “confession”.
In all honesty, I don’t think I care about his time with prostitutes, but it’s really annoying when any of these guys do this stuff on OUR dime, instead of their own.
Report thisBy kevin99999, July 15, 2007 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
sorry Joe! no one believes that conservatives are more genuine in their religious beliefs. Its is myth propagated by the right wing corporate media. The right wing leaders are hyporites and scam artists.
Report thisBy Maverick, July 15, 2007 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment
“let us remain skeptical whenever an ostentatiously pious conservative presumes to judge the faith of liberal Christiansincluding candidates for president.”
If only a candidate for president were able to be honest about his/her belief in something other than christianity.
Report thisBy bigjimbo, July 15, 2007 at 12:41 pm Link to this comment
The bible thumpers and jesus-freaks are NOT Christians. Their stock in trade is redneck bigotry and hatred? What has that to do with the teachings of Jesus Christ? Falwell, robertson, dobson, parsely, oral roberts, haggard, swaggert, bakker are bunko con artists, plain and simple. They should be investigated and sent to prison. It is interesting that vitter only sought forgiveness after he was caught. Clinton had an office affair but should have had better judgement. Vitter received calls from his prostitutes while the House floor. Creationist, inbred bible-thumpers are a greater danger to the US and to us than al qaeda. These side show freaks want to turn us into a dark age theocracy. I like the above comment on spirituality. Organized religion is what you get when the bureaucrats hijack spiritualty.
Report thisBy Goffredo, July 15, 2007 at 11:08 am Link to this comment
MightyPup,
1) Prostitution is illegal.
2) The crack backs are a result of the constant “we’re bringing honor and integrity back to Washington” quote by the Republicans. The same ones who are trying to protect the “sacred institution of marriage” by opposing gay marriage but yet frequenting a prostitute as a means of setting an example of a healthy marriage (?)
Not sure what you mean by “doing things the way they are supposed to be done.” So…according to that logic, our federal and/or state laws are completely and utterly irrelevant and useless because as long as you square it with God and your wife, everything is legit.
Again, the situation is rather syllogistic. Vitter frequented a prostitute. Prostitution is illegal. Vitter is a citizen of the United States of America. Therefore, he is subject to the penalty for breaking the law.
Report thisAm I off-base with this analysis?
By mightypup, July 15, 2007 at 10:56 am Link to this comment
I think he just doesn’t get it. I wrote Vitter expressing my support. He did things exactly the way they are supposed to be done. Christians are not perfect people, they are people who get back up. He did wrong, and he confessed his sin to his God and his wife, and repented. The fact that he did wrong long ago and the public is just now finding out does not mean he is a hypocrite, it is evidence that he takes what the Lord said seriously.
Report thisBy Paolo, July 15, 2007 at 10:50 am Link to this comment
Isn’t it interesting how a significant percentage of the American population wants to control what everyone else does and thinks: all the way down to their sexual practices?
Psychologically speaking, the religious right is interesting in that they tend to fall for whatever forbidden fruit appeals to them the most. They seem to condemn the practice, while practicing it!
This sort of weird, repressed sexuality has a long and storied history in America, going back at least to the Puritans. It seems that, by condemning certain sexual behavior, we give it the mystic appeal of the forbidden, which makes more people want to try it.
Then you’ve got really, really weird right-wingers like Ann Coulter, who markets herself as an allegedly attractive blond who makes a living bashing Muslims and Middle Eastern men while (if we are to give credence to the rumors) dating them. Again, the lust for forbidden fruit.
I have long espoused the libertarian view: why in the world should we care what politicians say about religion and sex? In fact, isn’t it kind of creepy that they claim authority to address these issues at all?
Report thisBy Goffredo, July 15, 2007 at 8:08 am Link to this comment
Cyrena - Bukko,
A old friend of mine gave me that nugget years ago. I can relate to it, as often times, when one arrives at a level of humility and is willing to make amends for previous transgressions, then and only then does one feel some sense of spirituality. The problems today is that so many confess not out of true contrition and willingness to change current behavior but rather out of fear of judgment in the after-life. All the while these same people continue to exhibit the same behavior and remain completely self-absorbed.
During this time of illegal war the right is so concerned with judgment and punishment. Ironically, they call themselves “Christians”, which could not be further what they truly embody. They claim compassion and understanding but it is completely conditional on you supporting the illegal war and supporting America in her search for a global empire.
And this is why I am a spiritual person and not a religious one…
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 15, 2007 at 7:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Religion is an allergic reaction to silence. Fundamentalists are idolators.
Report thisBy The Conservative Deflator, July 15, 2007 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Smokin’ Joe is right on - again. We should be taking the so-called Christian right to task every time a self-righteous asshole like Vitter goes down.
Look, Bush has conveniently used his fake “born again” label to escape having to answer questions like, “How many times have you been arrested?” and “Were you addicted to cocaine in the early 1970s?” that any Democrat running for the highest office in the land, would be required to answer. How can a man be elected president twice and the American public not know how many times he has been arrested?? Sheesh!
Report thisBy Skruff, July 15, 2007 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Enemy of State on 7/14 at 8:41 pm
“Im assuming the libertarians have money, many are business people, and want little to no regulation, or taxes. Thats what the Rs cater to. If in fact a lot of libertarians dont fit that bill, and they still vote R- they are simply being snookered.”
I would suggest that this thesis may be overbroad. While I would agree that business people in the class of the Walton Family, the Basses, or the Gates might be in the class you describe, Main Street businesses suffer under Republicans and Democrats alike. While GBush TKennedy and JMcCain & HRied get together to supply Tyson, (Clinton’s favorite Chicken Company) Hormel, and Microsoft with cheap Mexinac and Indian labor, most independent business men (and women) don’t benefit. Unless you are a Raytheon, Halliburton, or McDonald-Douglas you suffer under the 2.6 TRILLION the R’s have added to our debt.
The tax breaks going to the top 10% never make it back to Main Street because rich folks generally don’t spend “found money” they invest it, and right now off-shore investments (or investments made with Euro’s, Pounds, Pesos, or Canadian money, are a far better deal than betting on the plunging dollar.
(when the dollar falls small and mid-size business lose value in warehoused goods) Prices increase, the cost of labor becomes theoretical, and realestate taxes and rents increase. If you are doing business abroad (and are not Walmarts) the cost of imported items increases.
In my estimation, we are headed for a middle class melt-down, and the R’s (whom I used to support for “pocketbook issues”) will not be getting my vote in ‘08
Report thisBy Bukko in Australia, July 15, 2007 at 4:19 am Link to this comment
I second Cyrena about that “Religion is for…” quote, Goffredo, especially the first part. Did you come up with that yourself? If so—QUICK—copyright it!
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 14, 2007 at 8:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Religion is an allergic reaction to silence. Fundamentalists are idolaters who worship their own mental images.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, July 14, 2007 at 8:41 pm Link to this comment
Skruff:
Report thisI’m assuming the libertarians have money, many are business people, and want little to no regulation, or taxes. Thats what the R’s cater to. If in fact a lot of libertarians don’t fit that bill, and they still vote R- they are simply being snookered.
By John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 14, 2007 at 6:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Fundamentalism is an allergic reaction to silence. It is idolatry.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 14, 2007 at 5:52 pm Link to this comment
Comment#86936 by Goffredo on 7/14 at 4:31 pm
Goffredo: I have absolutely NEVER heard this explained or otherwise articulated any better than you have…
....“Religion is for people who dont want to go to hell for what theyre doing; spirituality is for those who have already been there for what they have already done.”.....
Report thisMan oh man…is THIS ever true. I’ve already memorized it….
By Goffredo, July 14, 2007 at 4:31 pm Link to this comment
My favorites are the “laundry list” prayer requests and the “God told me to do it” types. Wow! If I could only use that excuse when being late for work. What? It wouldn’t work? Bush invaded Iraq because God told him, “George, you go free those people.” If it works for preemptive war it has to work for being 15 minutes late to the office?!
Report thisReligion is for people who don’t want to go to hell for what they’re doing; spirituality is for those who have already been there for what they have already done.
By WykydRed, July 14, 2007 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
Part 1
Sorry. It’s a two-parter…
Ummm.. wow! I’m not used to being backed up. LOL. Thank you everyone for your kind responses.
I remember Jim & Tammy Faye. We threw a three day party when they were caught and all the swinging (which I am not opposed to at all), the air-conditioned dog houses, the boob jobs and the exuberant lifestyle was revealed. In fact, most of America cheered and laughed while pointing fingers at the entire congregations of these schills. Don’t expect pity, my dear hypochristians!
The problem, I think, lies in the lies of “holy books”. NOTHING “Jesus” said was actually written down until 80 years AFTER his death. And while the convinced will use the argument, “At that time, people were a verbal-relating society so their memories were exact” is all bullshit. The Islamics use the same argument. Everything Mohammed said was unremittingly memorized by men who came from a verbal society, so everything is, of course, perfect.
Go to boot camp. There is an exercise performed there that proves the falsehood of “exact memory”. People are put into a line. The Drill Instructor (or whatever depending on the service) whispers an exact message to pass along, such as: “Ridge 3 ReCon will meet up with Ranger 4 at coordinates zero zero mikey four in two days. Squad needs to be at coordiantes by <insert hours here>”. The message is passed along, verbally, by each man down the line.
By the time it gets to the end of the line, the message is: “Three poodles are meeting an umbrella at dawn for a cribbage game.”
Report thisSo many people have proven the falsehoods, the eradications of books from the bible, the lies, the inequities, the editing, the eliminations of words that meant something when they concerned women into a misogynist’s dream world, the thefts from other “holy books” written centuries before Benjy came along, how can you take ANYTHING in there seriously? But people say they do and then don’t and that’s what we’re all pissed about. If these people really DID take things seriously from their book, they would only own one house, one car, treat their employees like human beings worthy of respect and follow the meanings if not the words of a pretty interesting guy who had a LOT of balls to do what he did. And no, I don’t believe in the whole “Jesus” thing. The man was just a man, nothing more, and his name was Benjamin Bar Joseph. Census records confirm this, but when you tell a hypochristian that, they laugh and say it just isn’t true! Then you ask them, “Why were Joseph and Mary in Bethlehem to being with again?...” and they run away or cloak themselves in righteous indignation and attack. Point out to old ladies and loudmouths at executions that the bible clearly states it is not “an eye for an eye” but “Thou shalt NOT take an eye for an eye, nor tooth for tooth, nor nail for nail. Vengence is mine and mine alone sayeth the Lord” and then show them in their own bible, and they brush it away and accuse you of having your own heretical version of the bible printed up merely to “instill doubt in believers”. Yes, this argument was actually used against me. Then you show them Benjy’s birthday is actually March 28th and they are in fact celebrating a Pagan holiday…
By WykydRed, July 14, 2007 at 4:16 pm Link to this comment
Part Deux
Nothing is perfect. But when you allow all the poisons in the mud to hatch out, what you get is a decent story about a ballsy guy who just wanted everyone to treat people fairly. Odd thing is, when you get past the bullshit in all other religions, you get the same thing. And that fact that these things were done by simple human beings and not gods? There’s your miracle!
And military chaplains are taught how to circumvent christian beliefs in order to keep men and women fighting and killing. They are masters at talking people out of understanding, it don’t matter if you ask for forgiveness or repent or do anything else, no one has to forgive you! It’s not mandatory for your god or a savior to do so. Especially when you go out and do it all over again.
So keep claiming you’re saved. You are not. Keep buying cars and toys and houses. Wait until you really see what’s on the other side… And keep spitting on the thoughts and ruminations of a guy who owned one pair of sandals, lived with his parents and, despite having a clear psychic vision of what would happen to him if he kept speaking up and ruining Roman society, stepped out of his mom’s dark tiny house, looked around at all the faces waiting to see if he would sissy up or balls out, and opened his frightened mouth anyway.
That’s what hypochristians are doing every day. That’s what they’re instilling a hatred for when they beat their kids or send them to mind-control camp and make them worship an idol of Bu$h. This is why apparently a whole lot of us jeer and boo your asses out of the park and laugh at Jerry Falwell’s death. And Pat fricken Robbinson should crack open his own bible once in a while and re-read that Commandment One a few times. Thou Shalt Not Kill. That’s it! There is no “But… there are exceptions ...” When he shows me his god’s commandment that “Thou shalt call for Black Ops to send snipers to take out those whom Pat Robbinson and company deem ‘dangerous’ or unuseful to society,” well, expect me to demand that god come down in person, writeit with his finger in the sky and make all who are skeptical suddenly drop dead.
These sons of bitches had best hope there truly is no god out there. They got a LOT to answer for before they’re cast away.
See, with me not believing in the whole bullshit thing of religion, I have zero problem with people killing each other. They’re going to do that anyway because this world can’t support us all and assholes are still objected to birth control, abortion, dying when you’re supposed to and NOT being on fricken life support, and trying to “live healthier” so you can live past 100. Funny thing, when cancer comes to get me, I’ll let it. Christians are the first up to spend money they don’t have and wreck their families by “fighting just as hard as I can.” What’samattawityou? Ain’t you ever heard of “God’s will”? Oh. Yeah. You have. See what spending your whole false life gets ya? But you have a whole lot more to fear from death than most of us apparently do.
Report thisBy Skruff, July 14, 2007 at 2:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
86877 by Enemy of State on 7/14 at 9:52 am
“... about the Libertarians. If they vote their pocket-books they will vote R,...”
What???
Why???
Report thisBy Cichawoda, July 14, 2007 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment
If you give money to a “spiritual leader” and they end up living in a better house, driving a better car and eating a better diet than you - you are being conned.
Religion, as opposed to spirituality, is the oldest con in the world.
As a 2nd generation atheist I marvel at the gullibility of religious followers - their “spiritual” leaders appetite for heinous crimes and misdemeanors of greed and lust are exposed over and over through out the millennia. The hypocrisy of their “enlightened” gurus is plain to see by the light from the glitter of their indulgent life styles.
Why is it so hard to let go of the farce when the facts are right in front of you on the table? Why are so many people addicted to this drug? I understand faith, spirituality and a need for communion but why pay so dearly to the middle man? Why sacrifice your personal “salvation” to the con artist?
Report thisBy wagonjak, July 14, 2007 at 1:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
#86854 by Skruff…
So you’re opposed to Government Social Programs…I guess you’ll refuse to cash your Social Security checks when you get to be my age and opt for begging on the streets….
Good luck, you hypocritcal ahole…the largest Govenment Social Programs in the US are for Big Business, Agribusiness and Hallilburton…
Report thisBy Vasu Murti, July 14, 2007 at 10:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Abortion isn’t just a “religious” issue: it’s also a secular human rights issue. Christians on the far right aren’t “loonies”: just hypocrites.
With regard to Christians, the apostle Paul taught his followers to bless their persecutors and not curse them (Romans 12:14), to care for their enemies by providing them with food and drink (12:20), and to pay their taxes and obey all earthly governments (13:1-7). He mentioned giving all his belongings to feed the hungry (I Corinthians 13:3), and taught giving to the person in need (Ephesians 4:23). He told his followers it was wrong to take their conflicts before non-Christian courts rather than before the saints. (I Corinthians 6:1)
Paul taught that “it is good for a man not to touch a woman,” i.e., it is best to be celibate, but because of prevailing immoralities, marriage is acceptable. Divorce, however, is not permissible, except in the case of an unbeliever demanding separation. (I Corinthians 7)
Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality: “This is God’s will—your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God.” (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)
Paul told his followers not to associate with sexually immoral people (I Corinthians 5:9-12, 6:15,18). He condemned homosexuality (Romans 1:24-27) and incest (I Corinthians 5:1). He taught that fornicators, idolaters, adulterers and robbers will not inherit the kingdom of God. (I Corinthians 6:9-10)
Report thisPaul condemned wickedness, immorality, depravity, greed, envy, murder, quarreling, deceit, malignity, gossip, slander, insolence, pride (Romans 1:29-30), drunkenness, carousing, debauchery, jealousy (Romans 13:13), sensuality, magic arts, animosities, bad temper, selfishness, dissensions, envy (Galatians 5:19-21; greediness (Ephesians 4:19; Colossians 3:5), foul speech, anger, clamor, abusive language, malice (Ephesians 4:29-32), dishonesty (Colossians 3:13), materialism (I Timothy 6:6-11), conceit, avarice, boasting and treachery. (II Timothy 3:2-4)
Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12). He instructed them to ALWAYS pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)
Paul praised love, joy, peace, kindness, generosity, fidelity and gentleness (Galatians 5:22-23). He told his followers to conduct themselves with humility and gentleness (Ephesians 4:2), to speak to one another in psalms and hymns; to sing heartily and make music to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16)
Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshipping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14) According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)
My problem really isn’t with Christians not being able to follow Jesus or Paul, but with the hypocrisy of going around reverently saying “I believe,” and then ignoring what their religion dictates when it suits them. Why not just be secular, like everyone else? (It would certainly make things easier for those of us in the vegetarian and animal rights movements.)
It’s my contention all of us (Christians included!) really live in a secular society: one in which people merely pay lip service to religious ideals.
By Vasu Murti, July 14, 2007 at 9:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Abortion isn’t just a “religious” issue—it’s also a secular human rights issue. Christians on the far right aren’t “loonies”—just hypocrites.
With regard to Christians, the apostle Paul taught his followers to bless their persecutors and not curse them (Romans 12:14), to care for their enemies by providing them with food and drink (12:20), and to pay their taxes and obey all earthly governments (13:1-7). He mentioned giving all his belongings to feed the hungry (I Corinthians 13:3), and taught giving to the person in need (Ephesians 4:23). He told his followers it was wrong to take their conflicts before non-Christian courts rather than before the saints. (I Corinthians 6:1)
Paul taught that “it is good for a man not to touch a woman,” i.e., it is best to be celibate, but because of prevailing immoralities, marriage is acceptable. Divorce, however, is not permissible, except in the case of an unbeliever demanding separation. (I Corinthians 7)
Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality: “This is God’s will—your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God.” (I Thessalonians 4:3-5)
Paul told his followers not to associate with sexually immoral people (I Corinthians 5:9-12, 6:15,18). He condemned homosexuality (Romans 1:24-27) and incest (I Corinthians 5:1). He taught that fornicators, idolaters, adulterers and robbers will not inherit the kingdom of God. (I Corinthians 6:9-10)
Report thisPaul condemned wickedness, immorality, depravity, greed, envy, murder, quarreling, deceit, malignity, gossip, slander, insolence, pride (Romans 1:29-30), drunkenness, carousing, debauchery, jealousy (Romans 13:13), sensuality, magic arts, animosities, bad temper, selfishness, dissensions, envy (Galatians 5:19-21; greediness (Ephesians 4:19; Colossians 3:5), foul speech, anger, clamor, abusive language, malice (Ephesians 4:29-32), dishonesty (Colossians 3:13), materialism (I Timothy 6:6-11), conceit, avarice, boasting and treachery. (II Timothy 3:2-4)
Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12). He instructed them to ALWAYS pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)
Paul praised love, joy, peace, kindness, generosity, fidelity and gentleness (Galatians 5:22-23). He told his followers to conduct themselves with humility and gentleness (Ephesians 4:2), to speak to one another in psalms and hymns; to sing heartily and make music to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16)
Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshipping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14) According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)
My problem really isn’t with Christians not being able to follow Jesus or Paul, but with the hypocrisy of going around reverently saying “I believe,” and then ignoring what their religion dictates when it suits them. Why not just be secular, like everyone else? It would certainly make things easier for those of us in the vegetarian and animal rights movements.
It’s my contention we really live in a secular society: one in which people just pay lip service to religious ideals.
By Enemy of State, July 14, 2007 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
Oregonian, you might be right about the Libertarians. If they vote their pocket-books they will vote R, but the evangelicals are likely to be a threat to their freedoms -if they had any sense they would desert the Rs.
I don’t fear the Libertarians. I think they will always be a fringe group.
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, July 14, 2007 at 7:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I recommend we change the the name of the White House to God House.Senators to cardinals,House of Representatives to Deacons and The Judiciary to high priests.We rip up what is left of the Constitution and go with a fundamentalist view of the Bible.Why not?Lets go all the way.The muslims have sharia law we can start burning people at the stake again like the good old days.We can use the blueprint of the Salem witch trials.The greatness of America is that in running our government we discount religion and run it to man made concepts.The founders would be rolling over in their graves if they saw what we have done with the concept of separation of church and state.Even Joe Conasson has to writea column on the importance of religion in relation to government.Thomas Jefferson could not get elected to the Presidency today being a deist but George Bush can.Evolution in reverse.
Report thisBy Skruff, July 14, 2007 at 7:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What’s a libservative, republicrat athiest to do?
I just don’t know how to define myself anymore, where does a gun-owning anti death penalty, prochoice,person who is opposed to government social programs, or taxbreaks for churches to go?
Guess I’ll have to vote Capunist!
Oh woe is me!
Report thisBy KISS, July 14, 2007 at 6:53 am Link to this comment
It’s all about the MONEY. Repugs and christians believe in only one thing Making a buck at the expense of the many. That hymn is one of my favorites..” Fleecing all the Sheep”. Must be sung while opening stacks of mail, all with a check or cash.
Report thisWhat Joe forgot to mention is the amount of children taking over the ” Family Business” of husking the suckers out of their money. Think Billy Graham and Franklin and the evangelistic association..
By pro choice lib, July 14, 2007 at 3:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Wasn’t Christ crucified because he tossed the tables of the money changers in the temple? Yet these great christians are doing what Christ abhorred and are taking money from the government to help spread their twisted propaganda and deliver the sheep, er, voters to the polls on election day.
Report thisBy Antknee, July 13, 2007 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is everyone too young to remember Jimmy and Tammy Fay Baker? They fleeced their flock of millions of the hard earned dollars they weren’t worthy of. There of course was other serious crime happening and Jim did a few years in prison where he got Jesus in a whole new way. Or maybe that was the other Jesus. When you allow some one else to tell you what when where to think and believe by the suspending your given gift of a cortex you’re going to get screwed big time.Its scary having to think for yourself and take responsibility for what you create. The whole reason behind the right is convincing suckers that they’ll protect you by lowering taxes and get the federal government off your back. So the rubes and marks consistently vote against their own economic self interest. When the town figures out that the Carnival Tent Show on the outskirts are stealing them blind they get out the baseball bats, tar and feather buckets and go after them. Now Republicans Are the Carny’s and the whole town is shot through with people who’ll convince you to vote against your own interest just so they can steal some more from you.
Report thisHey a license to steal!
Now that’s the America They Want and think they have a right to. What do we Want?
By Oreganonian, July 13, 2007 at 10:31 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Re: EnemyOfState
I beg to disagree about all atheists being liberals. There is a veritable legion of Ayn Rand-inspired, Nietzche-fed, Grover Norquist-type capitalist true-believers in this country who regard any form of religion (save perhaps the worship of money) as not only infantile superstition, but as great a threat to humanity as communism, socialism, or space aliens. Indeed, from their moral viewpoint of “enlightened self-interest”, selfishness is virtue, self-sacrifice is vice; altruism is anathema and deserves to be suppressed at every opportunity.
Over the last twenty years or so, they have virtually taken over the Libertarian Party, but when an election looks tight, they invariably desert their own schmuck and cast their lot with the Repugnants.
If you think the kind of world the arch-Christians want is a scary place, you don’t even want to imagine the plutocratic hell these nutcases would impose if they had their way.
Report thisBy BobZ, July 13, 2007 at 10:19 pm Link to this comment
The book “American Fascists” by Chris Hedges exposes the Christian right for the frauds they are, including their hypocrisy, hatred toward anyway who isn’t like them, cheerleaders for the war in Iraq, hucksters for enriching their own pockets, and defenders of the rich. Jimmy Carter also exposed them and took to task the Southern Baptists for their turn to the extreme right. Bush of course has added fuel to the fire with his “born again” pronouncements. There is not much worse than a reformed drunk, who then can lecture the rest of us on moral values. No wonder most of the sane American are turned off by this entire travesty. I just hope the Republicans get their just desserts in 2008.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, July 13, 2007 at 9:25 pm Link to this comment
WykydRed
I will be unhappy if your post is deleted. While I’m only 90% in agreement, it contained some important experiences, that those of us who have avoided living in the bible belt should be aware of.
There is a partial truth about Demos being godless. Essentially anyone who isn’t a believer has been driven leftward by this C%#@^. So while it is incorrect to say that all Democrats/Liberals are not believers, you can say that nearly all unbelievers are liberals.
I’m afraid religion has become the primary partisan divider in our country. If you believe in a particular (reactionary) interpretation of Christianity you are a Republican. If you have a more liberal Christianity -or other religion -or lack of, you gotta cast your lot with the liberals. The good old days when religion rarely had an effect on elections are long gone.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 13, 2007 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s simple:
On the Left there was Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy, on the Right Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell.
That should tell you EVERYTHING you need to know about the “Christian” Right.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 13, 2007 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment
Just a quick description of “real Christians”....
These people practice(d) “Liberation Theology”...
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Father/Bishop Oscar Romero
They were both assassinated as a result, and there have been so many others as well, including those men and women of the cloth, that are attempting to serve the needs of so many people, who have been marginalized throughout the world.
THAT is doing Gods work, and one never need mention His name, or refer to one single Holy Book in the process.
Rather, they just DO THE RIGHT THING, which is STILL the right thing, whether we believe in God or not.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 13, 2007 at 7:24 pm Link to this comment
#86733 by WykydRed on 7/13 at 4:44 pm
WykydRed: I very much appreciate ALL of your post.
On this part though, I want you to be relieved….
....“I have no doubt this post as well will be deleted when some pseudo-christian complains about it, as some of the others have been. Just proves my point.)”....
BECAUSE…even if it IS deleted, (and I have a feeling it will NOT be, because this is the stuff that we ALL need to read) I’ve retained a copy of your excellent post, and so we’ll just keep posting it.
Report thisBy rfnadir, July 13, 2007 at 7:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I agree that the way the right wing claims to represent this nations Christians and assert that the other side is godless is abominable, but I’m becoming concerned about the way the left is starting to use religious language as a necessary retaliation. What seems to be happening is that religion has just become another code in partisan politics. A politician may or may not actually plan to legislate based on their religious beliefs, but it is a necessary part of rhetoric when speaking to the audience - a la “state’s rights” in the mid to late 20th century - and it is way in which Americans are being taught that they are supposed to judge their politicians.
Report thisBy WykydRed, July 13, 2007 at 4:44 pm Link to this comment
Good! Actual Christians speak up against these soulless beasts! About time.
Everytime some idiot says, “I’m a Christian!” it usually means they’re forcing a citizen to relinquish all their rights under the Constitution. It’s like the South. Say what you will about how “urban and educated” they are there, they are not! I spent three Halloweens listening to several so-called christian churches preach and put out flyers flat out saying they were going to “poison the candy so your kids will die unless this ungodly night is stopped once and for all”. (Yeah, I still have a few of the flyers so I’m quoting.) Were they arrested? No. Did the cops show up at all? No. The COPS said they were right in their First Amendment use, but WE were not for complaining. Watching the news, in another city in South Carolina, a couple who love Halloween put up some little gargoyles and pentagrams and spiderwebs and were going to enjoy the holiday. Their neighbors, all of whom showed up on tv claiming to be “Good, Righteous Christians” gathered around their house and demanded that everything come down AT ONCE! Their claim was that no one had the right to hurt their little weenie feelings and that “such things of the Devil” were interfering with their rights as christians. The homeowners were forced by the police to take everything down “because your neighbors have rights not to be offended.”
That’s how it’s worked for a long time in this country, and it’s only getting worse. These godless jackals have made their positions of hatred, intolerance, utter lack of respect for anyone not mooing in cadence with the herd and demanding that only their “christian values” be honored in this country and to hell with everyone else quite clear, but as soon as one person speaks against it, their klan comes running in to yell “you’re a christian basher! We don’t deserve this! We’re christians!”
The real Christians do indeed live by the whole live and let live thing, but it’s loooooong past time for everyone to start speaking up and slamming these theives, pedophiles and dictators into complete and utter silence. Let them preach their hatred in their well taxed churches. Take away their tax credits for contributions. Let them live by the words they claim to live by: Render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar’s and unto God what is God’s!
But then they can’t do that, can they? Not after they’ve made their position perfectly clear that, “God? We’ve prayed and prayed and prayed and you still won’t kill the abortionists, the ‘Liberals’ and the gays, lesbians and Pagans. You won’t strike dead the judges who uphold that lousy Constitution that is preventing this country from falling under OUR jurisdiction or smite people who refuse to clothe naked statues. So you know what God? To hell with you! WE’LL take things into our own hands thank you very much. WE’LL make laws and force others into doing exactly what WE want because WE are the voice of God, not you and your lousy rules. Go jump off a cliff, Jesus. You guys are done. We just need to invoke your names is all. We’ll teach people fear, by god!”
Thanks to those people, I finally saw the light and dropped any belief in a “higher power”. I appreciate the freedom guys. And I will use it at every opportunity ...
Report this(I have no doubt this post as well will be deleted when some pseudo-christian complains about it, as some of the others have been. Just proves my point.)
By Stevo, July 13, 2007 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Thank you Mr. Conasan for speaking the truth regarding the overly theatrical Right-Wing Christian coalalition and Evangelists’. This is an excellent start. However, and I am Catholic, this message and sentiment needs to be pushed forward into the mainstream media as well. Too long has the “crazy, loonies” that push their beleif of right and wrong, as these types see it, been allowed by “Americans” to persist and to force their views, their beleifs and their own agendas on us all. “We the People”, meaning all Americans, need to start working together to stop idiots such as Bush and others who use God as their reasoning to commit crimes on others. Are we now not supposed to forgive those who trespass against us because these people say so?
Report thisNot to mention how about getting the “Nazi” Pope to rescind that nomination for Sainthood of the former Pope during WWII….No one who did nothing in his position deserves to be nominated for Sainthood. Sorry, but that’s one sin committed by a former Pope that should not be forgotten nor overlooked.