|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Closing Politicians’ Bedroom DoorsPosted on Jul 12, 2007WASHINGTON—Perhaps because no one else will do it, I want to offer a qualified defense of Sen. David Vitter, the socially conservative Louisiana Republican who now faces a bit of a problem. Vitter admitted Monday night to a “very serious sin in my past” after his phone number was found on the client list kept by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, known as the D.C. Madam. This would not be good for any senator, but it’s especially troublesome for someone who campaigned on family values and the importance of marriage. My defense of Vitter is qualified because I personally believe that married guys actually do have a moral obligation not to seek the pleasures of “escort services.” Nor do I like hypocrisy. During the battle over the impeachment of Bill Clinton, Vitter wrote in The Times-Picayune of New Orleans that if no “meaningful action” were taken against the president, “his leadership will only further drain any sense of values left to our political culture.” Vitter, then a state representative, suggested that Clinton was “morally unfit to govern.” But a big part of me is rooting for Vitter to survive because I so want to return to a time when we—that we includes the media—chose to pay little attention to the extracurricular sexual activities of our politicians. The magnitude of our public problems does not afford us the luxury of indulging in crusades about politicians’ private lives, even those involving a high degree of hypocrisy. Advertisement The Vitter scandal was unearthed by Dan Moldea, an investigative reporter working for Larry Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, who has been on a campaign to expose the peccadilloes of socially conservative politicians ever since the Clinton impeachment saga. For liberals, there’s something satisfying in demonstrating that the sex lives of certain right-wing moral crusaders turn out to be less than exemplary. It’s certainly an outrage when straight politicians who deplore homosexuality in the name of the sanctity of marriage and the family take a less than sacred view of their own responsibilities. But if we are to get out of this habit of destroying all the distinctions between public and private lives, liberals need to give the conservative hypocrites a break. We should acknowledge that the outing process is erratic and leaves many falls from grace safely shielded from public view. We should also admit that we are tougher on the moral flaws of politicians who belong to a party other than our own. The essential point, however, is that believing in a wall between public and private life makes you a traditionalist, not a libertine. The traditionalist embraces a strict moral code but sees it as best enforced in the personal realm. We should judge public figures by how they meet their public responsibilities, and leave it to spouses, pastors, children and friends to praise or punish their private behavior. This isn’t easy. As voters, we judge politicians by a standard that inevitably includes a view of who they are as people. Like it or not, that view is influenced by our sense of their private behavior. For example, I greatly admired the late Paul Wellstone not only for his boisterous brand of liberalism but also because of the profound bond of devotion, respect and love that existed between Paul and Sheila Wellstone, married for 39 years. The Wellstones didn’t talk about family values. They just lived them. In their reticence and humility may lie an answer to our conundrum. Politicians could exercise more care and restraint in their public moral talk and convey a sense of understanding toward those with whom they have moral differences. In turn, the rest of us might agree to keep the public conversation focused on the larger questions—how to proceed in Iraq, how to fix the healthcare system—about which elected officials can actually do something. As voters, wouldn’t we forgive a politician many private sins if he or she handled those two issues successfully? Typically, we make fun of public figures who seek our sympathy by admitting to “sin.” But maybe a politician who admits to sin gains a certain degree of humility in the process. Let’s grant Vitter our collective absolution, and move on. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at symbol)aol.com. (c) 2007, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: Still Queasy After All These Years Next item: Bush’s Baffling Optimism Defies Harsh Reality in Iraq New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Inherit The Wind, July 19, 2007 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We are in the battle for the very soul of our Republic. With the election of 2006, we kept from sliding into the abyss of dictatorship. But while we are not sliding, we are still teetering, and still in terrible danger.
The BIGGEST weapons in that arsenal have been the attempt to steal Bill Clinton’s presidency via a phony impeachment based on his sex life. This was followed by stealing both the 2000 and 2004 elections.
It all began when the Republicans VIGOROUSLY defended Clarence Thomas’s nomination despite the fact that evidence went beyond his sex life to establishing that he was both a pervert and a stalker who deliberately harassed women. But THAT happened because they UTTERLY prevented ANY examination of Thomas’s views and qualifications to be USSC justice.
Bill Clinton’s private sex life was hammered and hammered by hypocrites doing EXACTLY the same thing. Remember Dan Burden calling WJC a “Scumbag” from the House floor even while he was dipping it outside his own marriage bed? Or Gingrich cheating on his wife during the trial?
EJ: It’s not about sex. It’s never been about sex. It’s ALWAYS been about an illegal, immoral, traitorous power grab to turn the USA into a corporate-run dictatorship, where there is no government regulation, no pollution controls, no protection of workers’ safety, salaries, or pensions, where even thieves on Wall Street who helped Enron rob billions are immune. It’s about government intrusion into the most intimate parts of our lives and bodies in the name of a whacko religious movement that’s infected and infested the so-called “red states”.
So I am NOT willing to sacrifice CRITICAL weapons in that battle. You know very well that the Vitters of the world want that dictatorship and that they will preach morality and family values while they are seeking more places to dip it—and in the dictatorship they will be IMMUNE and able to do it freely.
It’s not just about straying. It’s about fighting the people who tried to steal Bill Clinton’s Presidency and succeeded in making it VERY difficult for him to protect the nation. It’s about fighting the people who will use ANY AND ALL MEANS to end our experiment to create the corporate dictatorship where they can live like Saudi sheiks without having to answer for ANYTHING.
Report thisBy Shag, July 18, 2007 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
E.J.,
Report thisI usually agree with you. Are you hiding something. These rightwing assholes bring a lot of pain, to a lot of people. They don’t deserve a break. As a previous commentor suggested, one’s sexuality can cause one to be politically compromised. Also, there efforts to make others feel inferior by denigrating a lifestyle, gives me no pause in the glee I feel each and ever time one of them gets caught. Be it Limbaugh, Bennett, or Haggard.
By Allan Wheeler, July 17, 2007 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
We certainly can, and should, overlook Vitter’s sad little perversion. It’s NOT about WHAT he did. Besides his wife, who cares. It’s comic.
Report thisBUT we MUST NOT overlook his HYPOCRISY. HYPOCRISY is destroying our country. We have a liar-in-chief whose any word cannot be believed. And an administration of the same ilk.
When we can, we must make an example of these people whose careers are built on vilification for political gain. We must focus on important issues and stop worrying about consensual sexuality. But we must demand honesty from our government. We deserve it.
By kevin99999, July 17, 2007 at 8:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I sort of disagree. Candidate’s family values (including among them sexual predilections) are important in judging their fitness for the office. The higher the office, the more important it becomes, as one’s sexual obsession can have a great deal of influence on what the candidate does in the office. It can also leave him open to sexual bribes and blackmail, however far fetched it may seem but it has happened in the past and will happen in the future.
Report thisMoreover, the GOP will continue to use issues like these as part of their platform as they have nothing to offer the American public. We all know that GOP is a party of hypocrites and scammers, but running away from the issue as part of the political discourse is not the answer.
By One Little Victory, July 17, 2007 at 7:14 am Link to this comment
Nice comment, Marjorie.
Here is a simple message for the hypocritical politicians—-
You stop legislating morality and bedroom behavior and we’ll stop peeking into your bedroom, even when you leave the windows wide open.
Report thisBy Marjorie L. Swanson, July 17, 2007 at 5:23 am Link to this comment
In his news conference Vitter did not appear to be remorseful for his conduct. In fact he seemed really pi$$ed off that he had to even discuss it and tried to pass it off as just an opportunity for his “enemies” and political foes to pile on. The little woman, who had claimed she was more “Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary Clinton” seemed more Tammy Wynette than either. She also seemed more upset with the press parking on her lawn and at her church than with the man who broke their wedding vows. Both Vitters need to now be quiet lest their rampant hypocrisy be even more apparent.
Report thisD.J., if you think there was ever a time in history when folks were not interested in other folks sexual piccadillos you need to study more about human behavior. Just cause the press didn’t used to indulge those baser interests as much doesn’t mean they weren’t there.
By peedeecee, July 16, 2007 at 8:16 pm Link to this comment
I also have to say that E. J. Dionne is making one of the commonest mistakes that liberals make—he’s being a decent human being. I truly like that and agree with it.
Unfortunately, the right doesn’t display that kind of courtesy and kindness, hence such situations as the Clinton witch-hunt.
Unfortunately, the left has to play the right’s game.
Report thisBy jayinmt, July 16, 2007 at 4:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The politicians should stay out of the public’s bedrooms. In return, we should stop snooping on politicians sexual practices. On the other hand, if the politicians act to legislate morality in the bedroom, they become fair game.
Report thisBy peedeecee, July 16, 2007 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
I’m old enough to remember the time when politicians’ sexual peccadilloes were indeed private. There was an old boys’ club mentality - a wink-wink syndrome. But it was at the discretion of the media. If a politician was popular, or in a position of power over a particular reporter, mum was the word. (JFK)
Other politicians’ escapades were reported - Gary Hart is one good example.
Report thisBy One Little Victory, July 16, 2007 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
“One of the quotes attributed to Vitter indicated that he had spoke to God and God forgave him. Unless he has verification of this conversation with his deity, it makes him a liar in addition to whatever else he is.”
Amen… I guess you have to be a Republican hypocrite to have a direct line to the Almighty… I’ve been waiting for proof of God for years.
Report thisBy nf, July 16, 2007 at 2:39 pm Link to this comment
One of the quotes attributed to Vitter indicated that he had spoke to God and God forgave him. Unless he has verification of this conversation with his deity, it makes him a liar in addition to whatever else he is.
Report thisBy farmertx, July 15, 2007 at 11:07 pm Link to this comment
As long as there is no hypocrisy, as long as it involves only consenting adults, why should any of us care?
Report thisHell, I’d be willing to donate to a fund so that Duhbya could get some from Monica, Mark, whoever ,..it just might turn him into a decent guy.
OK, that is a real stretch, but right now, we all need some relief from this boy.
By great_satan, July 15, 2007 at 7:56 am Link to this comment
“For some strange reason, liars seem to be attracted to religion and politics.”
Report thisReligion and politics are the lies. False apparitions of true spirituality and statecraft, which are rarities indeed.
By MARIAM RUSSELL, July 15, 2007 at 7:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Great_Satan, you nailed it. Thanks.
I have said several times that I am sick of the constant windowpeeking…..it is a trivializing of social and political discourse, and distracts from consideration the issues that seriously affect our daily lives, as it is designed to.
BUT…..you are so correct that we have to go to the root cause….the assumption that a government has the right to regulate our personal behaviors to the point of telling us which adult we may have sex with…..putting politicians in a position to use sex against each other. As long as we put up with this, we will live in the muck.
So, if you support these sorts of legislation, then you had best limit sex activity to the solitary shower or bed with your marriage partner and there it might be a good idea to limit the activity to the missionary position, with both partners clothed, of course, nono of that nasty nakedness…..never know when your partner might become less enamored and tell all.
Report thisBy Louise, July 15, 2007 at 7:00 am Link to this comment
Two reasons why Hypocrisy matters:
Liars who lie to their loved ones will lie to anyone.
Cheaters who cheat on their spouse will cheat at everything.
Ergo: Liars and Cheats should not be trusted with anything.
Just in case you have the time to track down the other names on that phone list, you might want to visit: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
THE INTERACTIVE DC MADAM PHONE NUMBER BROWSER
For some strange reason, liars seem to be attracted to religion and politics.
Hey!
Report thisThere may even be some dems on that list!
Anybody up to the task?
By great_satan, July 13, 2007 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment
Sure I would love to live in a US wherein the personal sexual lives of politicians was ignored by the public. But even more, I would like to live in an US wherein the personal sexual lives of the public was ignored by politicians.
Report thisThis sort of lets play nice and lead by example tactic just doesn’t work. I wish it did. The democrats seem addicted to it. Republicans are on top simply because they are as ruthless as hell. The democrat politicians are certainly ruthless, cunning, and manipulative, but they also feel that they need the approval of those who vote democrat. So they hold off, because of just this attitude in their constituency.
So long as Republicans support sexually repressive and moralistic legislature, then their every hypocrisy should be exploited to the fullest extent and with a greater ruthlessness than they might go after a Democrat. Its not the sexual indiscretion that should be the point of the attack, (that is entirely counter productive!) It is the contract between their politics and their conduct that should be broadcast, ridiculed, broadcast some more and ridiculed some more.
By omop, July 13, 2007 at 1:23 pm Link to this comment
Vitter’s fate will be decided by the Cajuns in his home state as well as his wife’s decisions.
The “bedroom syndrome” was the topic of a recent get together of afficionados of a couple of Corona six packs to exchange views on what possibly could occur in the White House if Hillary Rodham Clinton gets elected Presidente.
A few vocal voices suggested that “she will probably personally occupy the office[desk/chair] where her husband did not have sex with Monica” while others stated unequivocally that “one of the conditions Bill has put on his contribution to her campaign is the promise she made that he could have access to the specific office[desk/chair] that Monica never used while he was in it”.
In short the issue that was never resolved after the consumption of several Coronas was that ” what goes on in closet offices[desk/chairs] in the White House has no bearing whatsoever on what goes on in a bedroom occupied simultaneously by both a politician and a woman contractor”.
The money though is on Bill getting his old preferred closet/office with the same desk and chair if HC gets back in the big House.
So there.
Report thisBy Scott, July 13, 2007 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
“Hypocrisy is amusing to contemplate, but it isnt all that important. It doesnt hurt anyone.”
We should definitely contemplate the important implications of powerful and secretive politicians that are practicing hypocrits.
I don’t see anything amusing about hypcritcal politicians at all, in fact I count them amongst the greatest threats that civil society faces today.
Report thisBy One Little Victory, July 13, 2007 at 12:20 pm Link to this comment
Hypocrisy affects us all, Dan, because it is these hypocrites that feel that they have the morally superior ground. These same people then seek to legislate their own morality, even though they don’t practice it.
Ted Haggard is a great example. Here is a man who lashes out at gays, and would seek to deny them the right of marriage based on his personal moral beliefs. And he was involved in a summer camp to help little kids to become Nazi-like Christian warriors who will put down sinners. Yet, in fact, Haggard engages in the very activities he professes to despise and to oppose for all of America.
If you have moral convictions, live up to them. If not, shut the hell up. I see something inherently wrong with Vitter professing to be holier than thou and bashing people like Bill Clinton when he engages in those same behaviors. It’s disgusting.
Report thisBy kelt65, July 13, 2007 at 12:15 pm Link to this comment
Neocons are all imbecilic, aging, wheezing syphilitic pathological creeps, dirty old men that smoke Cuban cigars and go on child sex slave vacations in third world nations while on oxycontin between snorting viagra and having secret affairs with gay sex workers. When they’re not spouting homophobic bullshit or writing breathlessly idiotic, fact free columns in major newspapers, clinking crystal tumblers brimming with $38,000 a bottle bourbon with the Skull and Bones / AEI classmates at grand elite socials, getting drunk and shooting people in the face, brazenly granting trillion dollar contracts to their former companies, raping teenaged boys in Texas Prisons, chronically sexually harrassing their female employees, they’re out doing what they do best: ravaging the life savings of millions of people and committing genocide.
All this while being ardently fawned over by the liberal media. These revolting sub-human colostomatic shitbags of perversion should all be in GITMO right now receiving DIY sex changes from Cuban medical student, only to spend the rest of
their lives as a NEOCON drag show touring East African nations.
Yes, their lies and hypocrisies should be exposed whenever and wherever.
Report thisBy madworld, July 13, 2007 at 12:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Come on people…of course the hypocrisy is vulgar and of course we don’t want or need to hear about private affairs BUT he broke the law and they are supposed to be the keepers of the law.
Forget about it being a bedroom matter…I don’t think hiring a prostitute is legal in DC (not sure about N’Awlins).
He broke the law, it matters. If it was shoplifting would that only be between him and his wife?
Report thisBy vet240, July 13, 2007 at 11:22 am Link to this comment
I do not agree with the premise that we should protect the privacy of our leaders. This only serves to perpetuate their hypocracy.
These Republicons, (cons is correct here) always state they have the high moral ground and they say the Democrats espouse immoral programs such as same sex marraige and the freedom of choice for women.
The fact is if you take a position of leadership and claim the moral ground you had better walk the walk.
This is no different jere than finding out a politicdian like Republicon Delay who claimed the high moral ground and stated he believed everyone should follow the rule of law but was discovered to have broken several laws himself.
People who desire to lead and determine the moral path for us all should not only be held accountable for their actions, the media should do their moral duty to protect the people by searching out the liars and thieves and expose their real natures to the world.
Report thisBy rage, July 13, 2007 at 10:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It serves the GOP faithful right that they are now the victims of their own invasive smeer tactics. The family values party of law and order has proven to be just a rabid pack of deceitful hypocrites overwhelmingly beseiged by every sexual proclivity known to humanity, gay or straight. What went on behind our closed bedroom doors would hardly be an issue, were the Christo-Fascist Jihadist Repugnitards not out to limit America sexually by legislating into federal law the missionary position through a hole in a quilt between a forty-five year old man and his sixteen year old chatel, all the while soliciting and stealthily distributing embarrassing high fidelity digital video of the indiscretions of their opponents or detractors. But, they introduced that rule into the game of political polarization, only to have it come full circle and bite their party square in the butt.
Suck it up. The Flynn Hustling will continue until the GOP faithful realize they are just as human and sexually driven as the rest of American humanity. We like ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Vitters in the diaper is just the beginning. At least the NOLA who’ said Vitters wasn’t a sexually abusive dope feind. Some of the coming miscreant scandals, however, promise to put to horrific shame anything Wes Craven ever held back for fear of public reprisals for downright indecency, not to mention making children wail and frightening animals. I guarantee the XXX-rated version of JackAss, the Republican Party! Clutch the pearls, sweetie!
Report thisBy dan, July 13, 2007 at 10:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Whay do people always rant about hypocrisy? Hypocrisy is amusing to contemplate, but it isn’t all that important. It doesn’t hurt anyone. The only person who has been wronged in this matter is the Senator’s wife. The rest of us haven’t been hurt. The wrong he did to his wife is really a private matter. It is immoral for a married guy to frequent prostitutes, but the aggrieved party is his wife, not the rest of us.
Report thisBy PaulMagillSmith, July 13, 2007 at 9:29 am Link to this comment
I usually don’t post my same thoughts on two different articles, but since the Flynt article deals with the same subject here goes:
I dont want these creeps creeping into my bedroom checking on what I do sexually in private.
If I derive a certain pleasure about seeing one of them face ruin because of what they did sexually in private does this make me a hypocrite?
No! Nyet! Nein doch! Because I have been consistant in my claim that sexual practices are a personal issue, and never tried to impose repressive morality on anyone else for political or monetary gain.
Ill defend Vitters right to sex, but slam him for his immoral, Do as I say, not as I do attitude.
Report thisBy Scott, July 13, 2007 at 8:32 am Link to this comment
“...I so want to return to a time when wethat we includes the mediachose to pay little attention to the extracurricular sexual activities of our politicians. The magnitude of our public problems does not afford us the luxury of indulging in crusades about politicians private lives, even those involving a high degree of hypocrisy.”
I agree there are far more important things than sex that the media needs need to be focusing on, like hypocrisy. I could care less about the sex. I’d like to say lets return to a time when the media paid attention to political hypocrisy but I have to wonder if that time ever really existed.
The 5th estate, to a large degree, has taken responsibility for facilitating transparency and accountability in the public’s domain. At present, the public can no more rely on journalists to check the abuse of power than people in the past could rely on the ex-communicative power of the church to monitor politicians.
In the future, politicians should be hard-wired to the Internet so their constituents can directly monitor what they say and do themselves. We need to outlaw all official secrecy in the public’s domain because the media simply can’t or won’t dig deep enough, and the politicians won’t divulge anything on their own.
The technology of the Internet should eliminate these problems.
Report thisBy One Little Victory, July 13, 2007 at 8:31 am Link to this comment
I like EJ’s stuff, but giving hypocrites a break simply empowers them to continue to be hypocrites. If these people are insistent on saying one thing and doing another, then there is such a thing as accountability.
I’ll make the hypocrites a deal…you shut up about how others should lead their lives and we won’t judge how you live yours. Until then, the brand of Larry Flynt “gotcha” being played right now seems very appropriate.
Report thisBy ctbrandon, July 13, 2007 at 8:06 am Link to this comment
I believe those who choose a career in the public eye, be it politics, hollywood, etc. should understand that a loss of privacy comes with the territory. If you are willing to break the law and disgrace yourself, be prepared when the masses turn on you.
brandon
Report thishttp://www.actforyourself.org
By kelt65, July 13, 2007 at 7:22 am Link to this comment
..... But maybe a politician who admits to sin gains a certain degree of humility in the process. Lets grant Vitter our collective absolution, and move on.”
He didn’t admit to ANYTHING until he was BUSTED. That’s not ADMITTING. He has broken the law - he’s a john - and deserves to be punished. Vitter should resign in disgrace and should do jail time. What do YOU not get about these dangerous, hypocrites legislating for those of us who don’t want to live by their psychotic morality?
Report thisBy RickInDallas, July 13, 2007 at 6:28 am Link to this comment
I beg to differ. Democrats need to fight on the terrain given, here expose and capitalize on sex scandals on the Right. We need to self-censor less in these matters—and surely stop eating our young, as it were—and play to win. Take a Dramamine, make a fist, and fight back.
Unless you want nine like Alito and Roberts on the Court.
Report thisBy mad_world, July 13, 2007 at 6:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ummm…isn’t soliciting prostitution illegal? He broke the law.
The hipocrasy is disgusting, and as mentioned above, those who protest the loudest usually have the same thing to hide.
The issue of extra-marital is between the couple, none of my business.
But he broke the law…what if it was shoplifting?
MADWORLD
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, July 13, 2007 at 5:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You EJ are a moron.When ever hypocrisy can be unearthed it is the job of the media to report it.Yes even Clinton.The impeachment was the mistake.If you want to carry a bible around and lecture the rest of us on how we should live our sexual lives than you better be on the mountain not in the trench.I am not saying it should be the deteminative factor in whether someone gets elected or not but I want to know if David Vitter is making a stand on morality or pandering for votes.It is all part of the package on what you vote on.If a man will pander on morality will he pander on other issues.To make my point if I know Clinton is catting around and I think he is better on other issues I would still vote for him.On the reverse the fact George Bush is monogamous would not be the deciding reason I would vote for him.As for your yearning for the good old days their were tons of sexual scandals in the good old days also.By the way your philosophy is why democrats do not win elections. They do not know how to go for the throat.Rove 101
Report thisBy Greg Bacon, July 13, 2007 at 5:20 am Link to this comment
As soon as some of our self-appointed guardians of morality stop visiting America’s Iman, Pat Robertson, so they can use Iman Pat’s own version of “Mecca” to loudly proclaim they are pure in heart, but we’re not, then we can stop turning the mirror on these hypocrites.
Report thisBy TomChicago, July 13, 2007 at 5:19 am Link to this comment
The hyprocrisy issue is one ugly aspect that we can possibly get past, but there is more than hyprocisy involved in Vitter’s outing. Not only was his family-values veneer a phoney, but he worked actively to demonize those of us who are not straight, nuclear-family Christians. It is the harm being done to us, not just the bullshit image he cultivates, that gives me some satisfaction as he joins the growing parade of liars heading toward the drain.
Report thisBy Hugo Arlman, July 13, 2007 at 3:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
From an European point of view I couldn’t agree more with EJ Donne. The American political climate has been infested with moral warming, too much morality and religion in words, too little in behavior. “With God on our side,” wrote Dylan thirty years ago, and we can see a lot of those godfearing, peoplekilling deeds around the US. Morals always seem to be about personal behavior, about sexual affairs, abortion, showing your tits in public, but never about shooting, maiming or torturing other people. A sometimes perplexing culture.
Report thisBy pqbon, July 13, 2007 at 2:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I think it is flat wrong to excuse and ignore the sexual life of people who see it there job to meddle in others sex life.
For the most part I couldn’t careless about who blew President Clinton. Mostly because he didn’t seem to care who wanted to do what to who among consenting adults. I greatly care that these NeoCon hypocrites were a) trying use others sex life for political gain (ala Clinton) (How many republican house speakers had to step down while they were trying to bust Clinton for sexual misconduct?) b) to repress and control people.
If it had come out that John Kerry had two male lovers and his wife and he shared women, I just wouldn’t care. But then John Kerry isn’t trying to make gays second class citizens. John Kerry isn’t trying to prevent sex education in schools. John Kerry isn’t publicly judging people for what they do in private and who they do it to.
NOTE: I used John Kerry because he isn’t running for president. I didn’t want to use a politician that is currently running for office and risk this UNTRUE example coming up in search engines.
To summarize: Stay out of our bedrooms we will stay out of yours!
Report thisBy glogrrl, July 13, 2007 at 1:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Although I usually agree with what you say, I do think it’s time to reveal the rampant hypocricy of the Republicans, especially in matters of sex. The ones who trumpet “Family Values”, “No Gay Equal Rights”, and “Personal Responsibility” are usually the ones with the most to hide. I am tired of these two-faced politicians always slipping by with their “sins” and damning to hell all Democrats who have done exactly the same as they have—just had the audacity to get caught. All the old bromides apply: He who lives in a glass house, yadayadayada; judge not, yadayadayada; and the true Golden Rule—Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 13, 2007 at 1:42 am Link to this comment
I ditto SecondTwo,
But on this, EJ,
.....” But maybe a politician who admits to sin gains a certain degree of humility in the process. Lets grant Vitter our collective absolution, and move on.”...
NO….I cannot do this collective absolution, (though I can move on). Nor should any of those who have been victimized by the types that Vitter represents. These people don’t become “humble”. It doesn’t change the corruption at the core, that causes the hypocrisy, and people like Vitter are never humbled. There are too many other things that are actually “wrong” with him, than just sexual identity crises, or even a fidelity crisis. In fact, nobody ever much gave a damn what anybody did in their own privacy, (at least I didnt) until they needed to go after Clinton. Then it got to be ridiculous.
But, its not about the morality of whatever it is that hes done or not done, and I dont need his confession on that, because again who cares. But the hypocrisy .to turn around and shove these very distorted values system down the throats of others, is simply too criminal to forgive.
We can all move on, but easier if he just bows out. He should pack up and head for the South Pacific soon.
Vitter was bad news before he came out, so he’s still gonna be bad news now.
Report thisBy SecondTwo, July 13, 2007 at 1:14 am Link to this comment
I think this is an extremely valid point. What people do behind closed doors is their own business, as long as they don’t harm others in the process.
I strongly feel, however, that you forfeit your own right to privacy when you intrude upon that of others. It’s right in the Golden Rule all these evangelicals claim to follow: “Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You.” Meddlers and hypocrites sacrifice their own rights, in my opinion.
Report thisBy Tom, July 13, 2007 at 1:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In politics I’m afraid the only thing that works is deterence. The best way to stop neo-con dirty tricks is to give them a taste of their own medicine. You are wasting your time trying to be nice to a bunch of bullies. MAD (mutual assured destruction)worked to prevent World War III during the Cold War. It has been the way of politics since the dawn of time.
Report this