![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
A Declaration of Independence From IsraelPosted on Jul 2, 2007
By Chris Hedges Israel, without the United States, would probably not exist. The country came perilously close to extinction during the October 1973 war when Egypt, trained and backed by the Soviet Union, crossed the Suez and the Syrians poured in over the Golan Heights. Huge American military transport planes came to the rescue. They began landing every half-hour to refit the battered Israeli army, which had lost most of its heavy armor. By the time the war was over, the United States had given Israel $2.2 billion in emergency military aid. The intervention, which enraged the Arab world, triggered the OPEC oil embargo that for a time wreaked havoc on Western economies. This was perhaps the most dramatic example of the sustained life-support system the United States has provided to the Jewish state. Israel was born at midnight May 14, 1948. The U.S. recognized the new state 11 minutes later. The two countries have been locked in a deadly embrace ever since. Washington, at the beginning of the relationship, was able to be a moderating influence. An incensed President Eisenhower demanded and got Israel’s withdrawal after the Israelis occupied Gaza in 1956. During the Six-Day War in 1967, Israeli warplanes bombed the USS Liberty. The ship, flying the U.S. flag and stationed 15 miles off the Israeli coast, was intercepting tactical and strategic communications from both sides. The Israeli strikes killed 34 U.S. sailors and wounded 171. The deliberate attack froze, for a while, Washington’s enthusiasm for Israel. But ruptures like this one proved to be only bumps, soon smoothed out by an increasingly sophisticated and well-financed Israel lobby that set out to merge Israeli and American foreign policy in the Middle East. Israel has reaped tremendous rewards from this alliance. It has been given more than $140 billion in U.S. direct economic and military assistance. It receives about $3 billion in direct assistance annually, roughly one-fifth of the U.S. foreign aid budget. Although most American foreign aid packages stipulate that related military purchases have to be made in the United States, Israel is allowed to use about 25 percent of the money to subsidize its own growing and profitable defense industry. It is exempt, unlike other nations, from accounting for how it spends the aid money. And funds are routinely siphoned off to build new Jewish settlements, bolster the Israeli occupation in the Palestinian territories and construct the security barrier, which costs an estimated $1 million a mile. The barrier weaves its way through the West Bank, creating isolated pockets of impoverished Palestinians in ringed ghettos. By the time the barrier is finished it will probably in effect seize up to 40 percent of Palestinian land. This is the largest land grab by Israel since the 1967 war. And although the United States officially opposes settlement expansion and the barrier, it also funds them. The U.S. has provided Israel with nearly $3 billion to develop weapons systems and given Israel access to some of the most sophisticated items in its own military arsenal, including Blackhawk attack helicopters and F-16 fighter jets. The United States also gives Israel access to intelligence it denies to its NATO allies. And when Israel refused to sign the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, the United States stood by without a word of protest as the Israelis built the region’s first nuclear weapons program. U.S. foreign policy, especially under the current Bush administration, has become little more than an extension of Israeli foreign policy. The United States since 1982 has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members. It refuses to enforce the Security Council resolutions it claims to support. These resolutions call on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories. There is now volcanic anger and revulsion by Arabs at this blatant favoritism. Few in the Middle East see any distinction between Israeli and American policies, nor should they. And when the Islamic radicals speak of U.S. support of Israel as a prime reason for their hatred of the United States, we should listen. The consequences of this one-sided relationship are being played out in the disastrous war in Iraq, growing tension with Iran, and the humanitarian and political crisis in Gaza. It is being played out in Lebanon, where Hezbollah is gearing up for another war with Israel, one most Middle East analysts say is inevitable. The U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East is unraveling. And it is doing so because of this special relationship. The eruption of a regional conflict would usher in a nightmare of catastrophic proportions. There were many in the American foreign policy establishment and State Department who saw this situation coming. The decision to throw our lot in with Israel in the Middle East was not initially a popular one with an array of foreign policy experts, including President Harry Truman’s secretary of state, Gen. George Marshall. They warned there would be a backlash. They knew the cost the United States would pay in the oil-rich region for this decision, which they feared would be one of the greatest strategic blunders of the postwar era. And they were right. The decision has jeopardized American and Israeli security and created the kindling for a regional conflagration. The alliance, which makes no sense in geopolitical terms, does makes sense when seen through the lens of domestic politics. The Israel lobby has become a potent force in the American political system. No major candidate, Democrat or Republican, dares to challenge it. The lobby successfully purged the State Department of Arab experts who challenged the notion that Israeli and American interests were identical. Backers of Israel have doled out hundreds of millions of dollars to support U.S. political candidates deemed favorable to Israel. They have brutally punished those who strayed, including the first President Bush, who they said was not vigorous enough in his defense of Israeli interests. This was a lesson the next Bush White House did not forget. George W. Bush did not want to be a one-term president like his father. Israel advocated removing Saddam Hussein from power and currently advocates striking Iran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Direct Israeli involvement in American military operations in the Middle East is impossible. It would reignite a war between Arab states and Israel. The United States, which during the Cold War avoided direct military involvement in the region, now does the direct bidding of Israel while Israel watches from the sidelines. During the 1991 Gulf War, Israel was a spectator, just as it is in the war with Iraq. President Bush, facing dwindling support for the war in Iraq, publicly holds Israel up as a model for what he would like Iraq to become. Imagine how this idea plays out on the Arab street, which views Israel as the Algerians viewed the French colonizers during the war of liberation. “In Israel,” Bush said recently, “terrorists have taken innocent human life for years in suicide attacks. The difference is that Israel is a functioning democracy and it’s not prevented from carrying out its responsibilities. And that’s a good indicator of success that we’re looking for in Iraq.” Americans are increasingly isolated and reviled in the world. They remain blissfully ignorant of their own culpability for this isolation. U.S. “spin” paints the rest of the world as unreasonable, but Israel, Americans are assured, will always be on our side. Israel is reaping economic as well as political rewards from its lock-down apartheid state. In the “gated community” market it has begun to sell systems and techniques that allow the nation to cope with terrorism. Israel, in 2006, exported $3.4 billion in defense products—well over a billion dollars more than it received in American military aid. Israel has grown into the fourth largest arms dealer in the world. Most of this growth has come in the so-called homeland security sector.
1
2
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: Truthdiggers of the Week: Barton Gellman and Jo Becker Next item: Harnessing the Sun Leaves Vidal in the Dark Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
«9 10 11
12
By THOMAS BILLIS, July 2, 2007 at 10:26 am # This wonderful article will bring out the anti semite and the pro semite and the Jews are great and the arabs are horrible people.If you are one of those people you are missing the point of the article.The question is what is in Americas best interests.If this article stimulates an open and frank discussion of what is in Americas best interests Mr Hedges you have done quite a service.Remember Israel is not the 51st state and a discussion of mistakes Israel may have made in relation to Americas best interests should not be a taboo subject.Thank you Mr Hedges for having the guts to open the subject. Let us hope some of our politicians have similar courage.
By Inherit The Wind, July 2, 2007 at 9:51 am # Hey, Chris, what’s your principle source, “The Protocols of The Elders of Zion” or the Hamas Charter? From your diatribe, I presume you would MUCH prefer that the US had NOT given any aid to Israel in 1973, that Israel was destroyed and the mass slaughter of 3 million Jews proceeded. That, of course, was one of two courses of action. The other was that Israel, in desperation, would deploy its nuclear arsenal, killing millions of Egyptians, Syrians and Jordanians in an attempt to survive, possibly causing the Soviets to nuke Israel, with a chance of American retaliation into WW III. So, Chris, which of those two alternatives would you have preferred--a second Holocaust getting rid of those pesky Jews once and for all, or a nuclear Holocaust? Why the F*** do you think we helped Israel, you anti-semitic neo-nazi? As if the destruction of Israel for fix ANYTHING in the Middle East? Every one of the leaders of the Arab world wants to be the next Caliph of Islam and rule a united Arabia. To get there, to the Caliphate, they are going to be at each other’s throats for ages. Let’s not forget that $3b in aid to Israel is ONE TWENTIEH of what we are pouring into Iraq each year (that’s $60 billion for you number crunchers). BTW, Chris, I find it VERY interesting that your attack on Israel features an American flag being burned.
By toc, July 2, 2007 at 8:49 am # The only way the Israeli alliance makes any sense is on a strategic level. It exists as a base for projecting American power in the Middle East. Aside from Turkey, no other option exists. Israel is closer to the important points in the Area, the Suez canal and the Straits of Hormuz. This is also the reason that Israel has the most up to date American weaponry. It makes it possible for rapid force projection. If you think that the Israeli tail wags the American dog, think again. If it were in the interests of the United States power elite, anti-Israeli sentiment could be whipped up over night. This article completely underestimates the cynicism under which strategic planning operates. I am neither pro-Israeli nor Anti-Israeli and I agree that Israel owes its existence to the U.S. My problem with the article is that it portrays the U.S. as being the tool of the the Israelis, while the opposite is true. It is Israel who dances to the tune of the U.S., make no mistake of that. The Americans are not some innocent dupes here, so why try to whitewash them.
By Martin, July 2, 2007 at 7:51 am # For me one of the most important connections between Israel and the US is the Christian religion in particular the American Evangelicals. They are often first in line to support Israel because, a) the Jews are chosen by God. b) it is much better if the ‘holy’ Land is in Jewish hands, then in Muslims hands. God gave the land to the Jews in the first place. Ever since the Crusades, when the Europeans were defeated with their ‘Kingdom of Jerusalem’ project, was the reconquista of Palestine a longing for the Western, Christian society. Israel is now doing it and in order to get paid, they point out the shared religious connection. But they do it of course only for themselves. Most Jews believe that they are a chosen people by God and some deduct from that that the mistreatment of members of other religions is permitted and sometimes even required. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article