LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

The Promise of a Courageous Al-Jazeera America May Be Fading

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Tropic of Chaos

Tropic of Chaos

By Christian Parenti

more items

 
Reports

GOP Identity Crisis

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 15, 2007

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

Note: This column has been revised since its original posting.
   
    WASHINGTON—The great drama in American politics today revolves around the question: What is the Republican Party?

    We think we know. Republicans are the party of business and of evangelical Christians, of better-off voters and people who hate taxes, the party of conservatism and the South, the party that wants to be aggressive in the war on terror.

    But the instability in the Republican presidential campaign, the longing for a Fred Thompson candidacy, and the sharp split over immigration all point to an identity crisis at the end of the Bush era.

    The last great redefinition of Republicanism, kicked off in 1964 with Barry Goldwater’s nomination, was resolved with Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980. Republicans bled liberals and embraced conservatism.

    President Bush’s goal to turn this alignment into a long-term majority was, at first, advanced by the public’s reaction to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Bush’s trump card, like Reagan’s, was the assertion that Republicans were smarter and tougher on foreign policy than Democrats.

Advertisement

    But the failure in Iraq has turned the party’s trump card into a joker at the very moment when the war has become the defining characteristic of the Bush presidency.

    Largely forgotten are compassionate conservatism, Bush’s early emphasis on education reform, even his close identification with Americans who are both conservative and religious.

    The most surprising finding of a Pew Research Center poll released earlier this month is that only 44 percent of white Evangelical Protestants approved of Bush’s handling of his job, down from a peak of 95 percent in October 2001.

    Rudy Giuliani has managed to stay on top in the Republican polls, despite his relative social liberalism, largely because Bush has imprinted national security as the Republicans’ defining issue. Giuliani’s entire campaign has rested on the tough image he cultivated in the weeks after 9/11.

    But since the beginning of the year, Giuliani’s support has dropped from the 35 percent to 40 percent range to about 25 percent among Republican voters. There is good reason to believe he will slip further. The Pew survey, for example, found that only 43 percent of Republicans identified him as the party’s pro-choice candidate. As awareness of his position among anti-abortion Republicans goes up, his support could go down. More importantly, the exhaustion with Bush, and Bush’s close association with the war on terrorism, could make national security less of a voting issue as the year goes on. If the security constituency shrinks, so will support for Giuliani.

    Thompson has emerged as the back-to-the-future candidate on whom many Republicans seem ready to project all their aspirations. His supporters are the core of the old Goldwater-Reagan fan club. The Pew survey suggested that voters well disposed toward Thompson are more likely to attend church than Giuliani sympathizers, be somewhat more conservative, older, better educated and overwhelmingly male. A recent Washington Post/ABC News survey indicated that Thompson is especially strong in the South.

    This makes Thompson a particular threat to Mitt Romney, who has used heavy spending to push himself to the top in the Iowa and New Hampshire polls and had hoped to be the sole candidate of the conservative restoration. The flow of the contest has left John McCain in the worst of all possible positions: He is closely identified with Bush in support of an unpopular war and of an immigration bill despised by the party’s base.

    All this has won McCain well-deserved courage points in his old press constituency, but few new enthusiasts among Republicans. No wonder McCain’s campaign this week, looking for an opening somewhere, went after Romney’s flip-flopping on abortion.

    With the new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showing Americans giving the Republican Party “their most negative assessment” in the survey’s two-decade history, the party’s presidential contest has become a battle of unhappy warriors.

    This disaffection explains the pure rage in many parts of the party over immigration. By highlighting the failure of border enforcement, the battle has given rank-and-file Republicans an acceptable channel for venting against the administration’s incompetence. It has also become the focus of Republican doubts about Bush-style internationalism and, especially for less affluent Republicans, a means for expressing legitimate economic and cultural anxieties.

    This could be the new Republican Party in the making: a disappointed, dissatisfied and inward-looking coalition that abandons Reagan’s hopefulness and tries to hang on by playing on fears of terrorism and anger about immigration. If Fred Thompson’s job is to restore optimism to a dispirited bunch, he faces a task that might have overwhelmed even Ronald Reagan.
   
    E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at symbol)aol.com.
   
    © 2007, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By ardee, June 20, 2007 at 5:45 am Link to this comment

On Conservatism

Please do not conflate the abysmal few here who call themselves conservatives but are certainly something else again with real conservatism. Conservatism is a legitimate political belief with some good and some notsogood points. Neoconservatism, as represented here is nothing more or less than lying bullshit.

I have ceased to read or respond to one in particular as he posts the most egregious nonesense and calls it gold. You know the guy just below us who fails, seemingly, to know the most obvious truths because they contradict his belief system, a sad and sorry excuse at best and one by whom all conservatism should certainly not be judged.

Report this

By Marshall, June 19, 2007 at 6:54 pm Link to this comment

#79347 by ardee on 6/19 at 3:47 pm

“Clinton actually reduced the size thereof.”

I’m curious how you think Clinton reduced the size of the federal govt.

“I believe that the role of government is… to defend the individuals within that nation as well.”

An important distinction between the philosophies of left and right in the US: the right believes that the role of govt. is to provide the conditions for individuals to “defend” themselves.  This is truly the difference between a culture of entitlement and a culture of empowerment.

Report this

By republicanSScareme, June 19, 2007 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Republican Party is the Nazi Party.

Pass the word.

Report this

By ardee, June 19, 2007 at 4:47 pm Link to this comment

{b] Scott{/b]

You stated:
Anything that reduces the size and role of big powerful governments these days has to be a good thing. If nothing else, there might be less to thwart small local governments from democratically instituting some of the social or economic policies that big governments seem to cock up all too often.

I believe that you miss the nuances here. Reagan noted the “harm” of big government , Clinton actually reduced the size thereof. Bush has made government almost useless with his appointments of industry figures to key positions in agencies designed to assist the worker obtain safe employment, the citizen get clean air and water, the consumer purchase safe products.

Bush has allowed the privatisation of far too much and at a cost we cannot afford to pay. I believe that the role of government is not only to defend the nation but to defend the individuals within that nation as well. We are currently defenseless against the cost cutting and profit taking of our capitalism run rampant.

Do you suggest that the Bureau of Mine Safety is unecesary, or the EPA, or the Consumer Protection Agency? Bush thinks so, do you join him? Do you honestly believe that the State or Local governments have the funds, the resources or the power to regulate? Do you not understand that clean air and water are national issues, international in fact.

Report this

By Mark in NY, June 19, 2007 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@Robert Giacobbe:  As a moderate Democrat I have to say your post was marvelous to read.  Please, in some idyllic future, let the Republican party be taken over by more people like you, sir.  My disgust could become respectful disagreement—a much healthier thing for our country.

Report this

By Scott, June 19, 2007 at 11:39 am Link to this comment

“...what he (Ron Paul) brings to the table is not what I wish to eat, thank you very much.”

You know what they say about lemons ardee.

Anything that reduces the size and role of big powerful governments these days has to be a good thing. If nothing else, there might be less to thwart small local governments from democratically instituting some of the social or economic policies that big governments seem to cock up all too often.

Report this

By Marshall, June 19, 2007 at 1:41 am Link to this comment

#78929 by ctbrandon on 6/18 at 7:54 am

OMG! That website of yours is wacko.  Just wacko!

Report this

By ardee, June 18, 2007 at 11:35 am Link to this comment

“Don’t be fooled. There is only one person running who could beat Hillary, his name is Ron Paul. I am a Democrat and have been since I was able to vote 14 years ago, and I will be doing everything I can to support Republican Ron Paul”

I am not easily fooled, CTBrandon, thus I must inquire as to how a democrat supports the Libertarian platform of Ron Paul? Are you in favor of
ending social security? Paul is. Are you in favor of ending welfare to the needy? Paul is. Are you in favor of the privatisation of all government services except the military? Paul is.

Ron Paul is a very intelligent man, one who is on the correct side of the Iraqi conflict to be certain, and probably the best of the bunch of GOP candidates. But what he brings to the table is not what I wish to eat, thank you very much.

Report this

By ctbrandon, June 18, 2007 at 8:54 am Link to this comment

There is no republican party, there is no democratic party. It’s all by design! This is an amazingly implemented strategy by the “Clinton/Bush party” to maintain control of the White House for 44 years. GW will hand it off to Clinton, who will win the election only because Bush has destroyed any chance the center had of voting for the right (intentionally). Clinton will then hand it off in 8 years to Jeb, who will appear as a savior of “Conservative American Values”.

Don’t be fooled. There is only one person running who could beat Hillary, his name is Ron Paul. I am a Democrat and have been since I was able to vote 14 years ago, and I will be doing everything I can to support Republican Ron Paul.


ctbrandon
http://www.actforyourself.org

Report this

By ardee, June 18, 2007 at 6:00 am Link to this comment

#78838 by Robert Giacobbe on 6/17 at 7:38 pm
(Unregistered commenter)

As a Barry Goldwater, libertarian-leaning conservative, I’ll tell you what I think this presidency, a Republican in name only, stands for.


Bob, Welcome and I look forward to discussion with a real conservative, some of whose ideas I share. We have, currently, only the execrable neocons here and they are worthless in any attempt at honesty, accuracy or fairness.

Report this

By Robert Giacobbe, June 17, 2007 at 8:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As a Barry Goldwater, libertarian-leaning conservative, I’ll tell you what I think this presidency, a Republican in name only, stands for.

He, and primarily his VP and chief advisor, stand for a singular agenda: holding onto power for the sake of power.  They’ve demonstrated no consistent loyalty to any traditional Republican faction - the Steve Forbes flat taxers, the Ralph Reed religious wackos, the Milton Friedman free marketeers - to be labeled as such.  They’re produced and supported a mish-mash of legislation and executive actions that at times can only legitimately be called hostile to conservative ideology.

On one hand they have complete contempt for the federal bureaucracy, dismantling it by diluting its regulatory bite, and liberally staffing it with incompetent, religiously-tinted lobbyists, friends and associates.  On the other hand, they’ve expanded the scope of the federal government’s responsibility and trampeled state’s rights when it comes to privacy, environmental and business regulations.  Again, to me, this is exercising power for pure sake of it.

Barry Goldwater’s approach to the federal government was to reduce it, streamline it and make it more effective for the betterment of the citizenry.  Bush’s approach is to weaken it, morph it and use it wrecklessly to the detriment of the citizenry.  Despite this huge difference, these clowns have so poisoned the perception of conservative ideology that the average man on the street doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude any more to easily discern the difference.  And I don’t blame him…

The Bush circus believes in the concept of the unitary executive.  They have total contempt for the Congress and only a minor sufferance of the legal branch.  They believe a president’s right to impose his will through executive orders, signing statements, beholding appointees and forced-through legislation supercedes any notion of the separation of powers.  They could care less that the US Constitution has the formation of the Congress as Article I and the President as Article II.  In the event that legal or constitutional strictures, such as the War Powers Act, may impede their agenda, they will lie through, and distort the sacred missions of the CIA, NSA and DoJ to achieve their ends.  I’ve heard that Cheney has a tatoo of Nicco Machiavelli tatooed on his left ass check.

They believe in a mass subsidization of the military-industrial complex to the enrichment of pet industries, companies and associates.  They believe that America’s actions on the world stage are right and good, regardless of their intent or outcome, purely because America executed them.  They would destroy the access and leverage of the free press, based on a belief that the unitary executive requires no transparency or accountability to the republic.  They believe in a constant, unyielding flow of propaganda - they effectively use scary hob-goblins such as terrorists, WMD and mushroom clouds, to justify their actions.  Truth is entirely relative to them - they positively revel in their own version of the truth, much like a huge, flabby wild hog roots around in his own feces until you can’t tell pig from shit anymore.

As a conservative (not Republican… I can’t affiliate myself with the party anymore), I’m ashamed of this president and the damage he has wrought, especially on the international stage.  I’m heartbroken about the harm he has done to the marketplace of political ideas, and how he has poisoned the atmosphere between parties.  The hatred spewed towards conservatives in blogs like this are evidence of that…  I sincerely hope we elect a leader in 2008 that can mend our great divide, make good with our allies, prosecute the Bush criminals after they leave office, and allow conservatives to purge their party and re-establish a sense of balance and progress to our platforms.

Report this

By ardee, June 17, 2007 at 6:48 pm Link to this comment

I understand the attraction of a fellow like Ron Paul, heck I admire the guy myself. In the company of the abysmal candidates fielded by the GOP one who cites historical accuracies, can put sentences together in a literate and understandable fashion and doesnt sing the one note samba of “the terrorists are coming” stands out rather well.

I would point out however that Paul’s idea of social safety nets for our less fortunate brethren is none whatsoever, he is, after all, a Libertarian. He would seek to end social security, welfare, unemployment insurance, forget about single payer health care and his solutions to everything would certainly be to allow capitalism free reign. We have seen how that turns out havent we?

Report this

By Marshall, June 17, 2007 at 6:05 pm Link to this comment

#78716 by Leefeller on 6/17 at 7:52 am

Bush’s cellular “decider” plan does have minutes limitations as well, so the Pope may have just been helping him keep his montly bill down.

Report this

By madmilker, June 17, 2007 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

well, it ain’t this…......

#80

http://www.teambio.org/2007/06/ron-paul-introduces-legislation-to-abolish-the-federal-reserve/

Report this

By Louise, June 17, 2007 at 2:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As usual, the masses frustrated over the dems inability to move faster to stop the Juggernaut of Fascism breeding in our society are feeling like all politicians are the same.

Support for Kucinich makes sense, because he’s always had the foresight and courage to stand against the popular and function in the realm of common sense.

But, the nay-sayers point out Dennis Kucinich is a democrat and since they see all dems and all repubs as playing to the same base, he is not to be trusted.

Support for Ron Paul makes sense, because he has the foresight and common sense to stand against the popular.

But, THIS nay-sayer would like to point out he is a republican, and THEY have proven they can’t be trusted!

Meanwhile, president wannabees like Joe Lieberman, Newt Gingrich and Chuck Hagel, their noses sniffing out the opportunity of “change” are talking about being an “Independent” candidate. Nothing works better for the opportunist than divide and conquer. Only in this case they don’t need to. We’re doing it for them.

Were their a strong, well-led and well organized “Independent ” party, offering a truly qualified candidate. And were there truly dedicated people behind them ready to work and give and share the leadership, and the problems, I’d join in a heartbeat!

But their isn’t.

What there is, is a disorganized and barely credible bunch of disparate groups all with their own gripes and poorly defined agendas. And a lot of nay-sayers who daily remind us what’s wrong [myself included] and how badly we need a third party, followed by a mind-boggling unwillingness to do anything about it!

Besides, as anyone with the sense of an earthworm knows, people who can think and people who like to be independent are darn near impossible to get organized behind a common political goal!

That is after all why the repubs have success! Focus on the easiest to organize and control, then tell them what to do.

I recently had a conversation with a veteran. He expressed disgust and dismay with Blackwater and similar private contractors who play soldier. “They are demoralizing our troops on the ground,” he said. “And worse than that they create problems they cant fix, leaving our troops to go in and clean up after them and get shot in the process!”

Then he asked the $64 question!
“Why do we need a private army anyway? We’re supposed to have the best military in the world!”

Our military’s being destroyed, our economy’s threatened, we’re fighting a costly and losing war, our civil rights are being taken away from us, crime is up, the drug problem grows exponentially, 40% of our population cant get proper health care, and the 109th congress stands as witness to the depth of cronyism and corruption in government.

Yet, the most urgent problem half the population feels threatened by are illegal emigrants!

“Why do we need a private army anyway?”

Because any scholar of the Constitution and military history will tell you how difficult it would be to get our military to turn on and imprison us. Private mercenaries on the other hand ... well some folks will do anything for money. The “Immigration problem” serves as the distraction and ultimately the excuse for federal prisons to house problem civilians. And we already have those prisons and the private armies in place. Blackwater and like-minded associates, are ready and willing to do anything if the price is right. A price by the way that we are paying!

So, what can we do?
Short of a miracle ... like main-stream media getting it, or us getting organized. The only thing that makes sense is getting behind Kucinich. As of Friday, eight Senators have signed on to his Impeach Cheney Resolution. Lets put some pressure on our Senators to follow the lead!

Then, if we really want to do something besides bitch and moan, lets spend 2008-2011 organizing the VIABLE third party! Because I doubt it can be done in a few months!
In fact, I’ve been around long enough to know it cant!

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 17, 2007 at 8:52 am Link to this comment

Billy the Dik on 6/16 at 8:08 pm
(317 comments total)

“Yeah, Marshall, Reaganomics and voo-doo-doo economics!!  Let them eat lead!”

Billy,

You and Marshall should know there is a major difference between fortune tellings, psychics and voodoo.  Reagan and Nancy ended up using psychics to make the harder decisions instead of voodoo. Nancy tried voodoo, but found chasing chickens around White House to be a problem.  Also, cutting off ther heads and using chicken parts did not work for her,  especially after the White House staff complained, about clean up.

Bush has one over Reagan. He uses his hotline to talk to God directly,  the Pope called a meeting with Bush last week and they both agreed to keep the calls shorter.

Report this

By Lonzo, June 17, 2007 at 7:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

E. J. is seeing the elephant, all right, but I don’t think he recognizes what he is seeing. Thompson as the heir to Goldwater/Reagan?  Liberal, please. All this trouble just to keep from mentioning the only real conservative in the race: Ron Paul.
Just think, if Ron Paul teamed up with Bill Richardson…

Report this

By Marshall, June 16, 2007 at 8:49 pm Link to this comment

#78561 by Dale Headley on 6/16 at 11:59 am

<<now that the easy choice of removing taxes on multi-millionaires has failed to “trickle down”>>

Dale - can you substantiate this claim with actual data?  Because I can certainly refute it.

Report this

By Mudwollow, June 16, 2007 at 2:25 pm Link to this comment

God I hate “push polls”. In a way, the entire United States media has become one big push poll.

Who gives a damn about the GOP’s identity. Republicans and Democrats could switch identities (and do) and no one would notice. For these gangrenous groups, having an identity as a liability.

Report this

By Dale Headley, June 16, 2007 at 12:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Above all, the Republican Party is the party of oversimplification.  To a Republican there is no such thing as a complex issue or one with any nuance.  Democrats tend to look at all problems as having many colors; Republicans only see black & white.  Education is in trouble in America?  Make ‘em learn!  There is no great debate about how to accomplish that: get better teachers.  Really?  Where from?  The economy is struggling? Lower taxes (on the rich).  The economy is doing great?  Lower taxes (on the rich).
  Republicans are very uncomfortable with delving into the depths or ambiguities of a problem; they simply want to find a quick, uncomplicated solution.  Terrorism?  Kill all terrorists!  Who are the terrorists?  Doesn’t matter - kill everyone who looks like a terrorist. Causes of terrorism?  Who cares?  Let’s go to war against someone to prove you can’t screw with us.
  What is at the core of the Republican’s current woes is that they have relied upon a simple-minded President to handle enormously byzantine problems.  Now that the simple expedient of war has faltered; now that the easy choice of removing taxes on multi-millionaires has failed to “trickle down”; now that we’re faced with a potentially disastrous environmental problem without any simple answers, the Republicans are lost, since they just don’t know how to deal with complexity - even if they wanted to.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 16, 2007 at 8:51 am Link to this comment

#78515 by ardee

As usual we are preaching to the choir here.  Big money, no question is calling the shots.  One other problem I see, is even Dennis Kicinich places party loyalty over the nation.  He has already said he would support whoever wins the Democratic Ticket. I take that to mean, if third party candidate happened to come into play who supported all his ideas, he would not support them instead the Democratic pablum candidate. (Hillery or Obama) 

Our two party system provdes choices like Wallmart and Sams Club, we have two competing business, to provide perks for the fat-cats at the top.  One only need look at slimes Lerberman to see the differences are so subtle not to be visible at all. 

Greed blinds compassion, integrity and truth, that is why our politicins dump half truths and lies on us, is there a difference?

Report this

By ardee, June 16, 2007 at 7:16 am Link to this comment

DennisD and Felicity are close enugh to the mark while, in my opinion, loveinatub misses the real mark.

The author should have titled this piece,“What is wrong with American politics” in that the two major parties are just two sides of the same coin. Both are wrangling over the thirty pieces of silver tossed out by the real rulers of America, the corporations. Unless and until we see real honest election reform, until we live under a system that responds, not to the amount of the check but to the mark on the ballot, we will remain under an abusive system.

The GOP , like the boy who rode the tiger, put itself on the back of religious extremists and the military industrial complex, and now finds that it is far easier to mount than to dismount. The DLC driven Democrats, in their drooling eagerness to catch some of the corporate largess, ignore the strings attached and find themselves unable to both speak the truth and gain the money, what a quandry…...

Report this

By Skruff, June 16, 2007 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

78359 by kevin99999 on 6/15 at 1:08 pm

“There is no such identity crisis. The Republican party is what it always was…a corporate instrument for economic and political control of this country. They used wedge issues, like gay marriage, abortion, etc., with the help of corporate media, to build broader support for electoral purposes.”

Can we pause here a minute in our slugfest?

A Republican gave us the entire National Park system.
It was the same Republican who reined in business last time they attempted to re-institute slavery.

It was a Republican who gave us the most peaceful eight years in the 20th century.
It was a Republican who gave us the Warren Court

Earl Warren was the progressive Governor of California.

Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan, was one of the great,liberal, legal minds of the 20th century, and the antithesis of Byron (Wizzer) White a Democrat appointed by John Kennedy.

When the Country goes crazy (as it has a tendency to do) it doesn’t do it by party. Joe McCarthy was a Republican, but Bobby Kennedy was his close aid.
Margaret Chase Smith (another Republican) stopped him in his tracks.

James J Walker was a New York Mayor and the last of the Tammney Hall(Democratic) big-shots.
Republican Fiorello LaGuardia closed them down, and ran the cleanest administration in New York City’s history.

Norris Cotton stopped the Feds from jamming a highway through Franconia Notch and destroying one of the greatest sites in New England

Francis Sargent Republican Governor of Massachusetts lowered the Commonwealth’s crime rate by half when he closed down the 150-year-old reform school system.

I could continue, but the list would be longer than allowed by this site.

I dispise the current administration. but I dispised Clinton’s also.

My point is it is the person’s action which matters, not the letter next to his name.

PS we have had two Independent governors here in Maine over the last 30 years ... both stunk!!

Report this

By KYJurisDoctor, June 16, 2007 at 12:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This, hopefully, is the NEEDED transformation of the Republican Party that puts it on track to become (once again) what Abraham Lincoln, William H. Seward and other like minded folks had in mind when they founded the party! <sigh>

http://OsiSpeaks.com or http://OsiSpeaks.org

Report this

By THOMAS BILLIS, June 15, 2007 at 8:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

E.J. the people have seen the republican party in control of everything and they do not like it.There is a hunger for the old democratic party but alas that is nowhere to be found.In their desire to appeal to people who would never vote for them they are are trying to become republican light.There is such a yearning for a third party that will actually represent the people rather than different corporate interests.If a third party on the left runs it will surprise the inside the beltway pundits at the instant popularity it will achieve.If this is a turn the page election which one of the candidates is capable of that.Most people would say Obama but until he puts some meat on all the kombaya rhetoric he is going nowhere.

Report this

By DennisD, June 15, 2007 at 8:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Before everyone goes off on the tried and true rant, the Democrats are saints and Republicans are all scumbags. Ask yourself this, what has been done for you as an individual by either party in the last 40-50 years. After all aren’t the politicians supposed to be working for us.
Not a damn thing since LBJ’s “Great Society” legislation. We’ve been placed further and further under the thumb of the corporations who truly rule this country. Both parties are just fronts. Big business has them both in their pocket and doesn’t give a rats ass which one wins because they win either way.
Vote third party because both parties biggest fear is that someone like Ross Perot will go on television and show the American people just the what the hell is being done to them. Simple charts and graphs and he scared the shit out of the Dems and Repubs. It can happen again and the right person can win. The people of this country are fed up enough to make it happen. Don’t buy into the you’re wasting your vote crap. A vote for change is never wasted.

Report this

By felicity, June 15, 2007 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

Generally speaking being a Republican is not a matter of ideology as much as it is not being a Democrat.  So when Republicans screw up like the Bush bunch has, with no real ideology to fall back on the once party-faithfuls, the red-state bunch, find themselves at sea without a paddle.

A classic conservative divides humanity in two - those who should rule and those who should be ruled. (There weren’t a few Founding Fathers who believed just that evidenced by our pre-amendment Constitution.)

An ideologue conservative - and there are a few of them in the Republican party - holds to that belief. (Is their a Republican candidate alive who would shout that message to the roof tops - on the fourth of July no less?)  Hardly

So finally who’s going to restore law and order to Dodge City?  The guy in the white hat.  Only an actor can pull it off.  If the Republicans don’t nominate Mr. Thompson, they’ll probably lose the election.

Report this

By ~B~, June 15, 2007 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

I’m not sure how I got on the RNC mailing list but here is a questionnaire they sent me yesterday. I posted the entire questionnaire on my blog this is an excerpt:

Homeland Security Issues:

1. If Democrats try to gut the USA Patriot Act and other important laws that promote the safety and security of all Americans, should the Republicans fight back?

2. Should we stop the Democrats from cutting funding for our intelligence agencies or bring back Clinton-era restrictions on inter-agency communications?

3. Do you support the use of air strikes against any country that offers safe harbor or aid to individuals or organizations committed to further attacks on America?

4. Should we do everything we can to stop Democrats from repealing critical border and port security legislation?

5. Should our homeland defense forces use profiling to protect our nation?


Economic Issues:

1. Should we continue working to permanently repeal the Inheritance or “Death Tax”?

2. Should President Bush’s successful income and capital gains tax cuts be made permanent?

3. Should Republicans renew the fight for a Balanced Budget Amendment?

4. Should Republicans unite to keep our pro-growth achievements from the past six years intact by blocking new federal government bureaucracy and red tape?

5. Should Republicans in Congress oppose the new wasteful government spending programs proposed by the Democrats and their leaders, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid?


Domestic Issues:

1. Do you agree that we must stop illegal immigration?

2. Should we continue working for serious tort reform to protect individuals and small businesses from predatory lawsuits?

3. Should we make sure President Bush’s judicial nominees receive fair hearings and up or down votes in the Senate even when Democrats threaten a filibuster?

4. Should Republicans in Congress protect American’s private property rights from eminent domain?


Shows ya why we are in the mess we are in doesn’t it?

B

http://b-political.blogspot.com/

Report this

By loveinatub, June 15, 2007 at 2:34 pm Link to this comment

What is the republican party?

Predominantly white, male, Christian, ardent supporters of an obscene military industrial complex, against abortion, in favor of “free-market” based solutions towards everything, opposed to government regulation, against taxation, wedded to right-wing Christian politics, against gun control, in favor of capital punishment, against marijuana decriminalization, ardent property rights supporters, against pornography, against single payer health care, against federal mandates on the private market, what else am I missing?

The Republicans don’t have an identity crisis, per say. The party itself is bought and paid for by the oil industry, big pharma, wealthy tycoons, right-wing Christian zealots. It’s just that now they are faced with the damage caused by their saint, George W. Bush, and his disastrous policy of invading and occupying Iraq. It will cost the Republicans the Presidency in 2008. Otherwise the republicans can continue their merry way and you know what?  They will be re-elected time and again because the majority of Americans identify with so-called Republican values. What is a liberal to do?

Report this

By kevin99999, June 15, 2007 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is no such identity crisis. The Republican party is what it always was…a corporate instrument for economic and political control of this country. They used wedge issues, like gay marriage, abortion, etc., with the help of corporate media, to build broader support for electoral purposes.

It is not to say that Democrats are that much different from Republicans. The internet has somewhat reduced the
power of the corporate media because it provided an outlet to people with different views. I am sure sooner or later they will try to control the internet as well. They will create a crisis and attack the unsupervised use of the internet.

Report this

By peacefull1, June 15, 2007 at 1:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s the party of pollution, exploitation, corruption and destruction.  Plain and simple

Report this

By Louise, June 15, 2007 at 12:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Must be the toughest thing in the world writing about republicans. You have to dig through history, find and assign labels. And most difficult of all, each of those labels has to imply that there is actually a difference between the leaders of old, their modern counterparts and each other.

The only difference is how they define their sameness. Because in fact, the republican party has changed little since Nixon first popped a seam waving his arms, fingers spread in a hopeless mockery of wanting peace in the world. I say little, because they no longer even try to pretend to be honest conservatives. Which no doubt leads to the confusion in their party membership who struggle daily to understand, what exactly does conservative mean?

I think I can sum that up pretty easy. Given the reality juxtaposed over the belief, “conservatism” in the collective minds of republican leadership seems to be a synonym for DUMB. How do you like that folks? Your leaders think you are dumb.

OK, now that everybody’s paying attention, take a look at the reality that led to this conclusion.

FOURTEEN CHARACTERISTICS OF FASCISM
http://www.chetzar.com/fascism.html
Folks, you’ve got to read this!

As Michael Rivera ( http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ )
so succinctly put it,

“If it ‘Sig Heils’ like a duck ...”

#78289 by Inherit The Wind
“Finally, there are the dupes.  They fall for the rhetoric of the Feudalists and/or the Fundies without ever questioning two things: 1) Is it in my and my family’s best interest, 2) is [it] real or a big phony.  They also fall for another scam put out for years: Only Wimps, Commies, pussies, fags and dykes vote Democratic.  Real Men vote Republican.”

“Even if it kills them, their nation and their freedom.”

“Vote Democratic! Even if you have to hold your nose!”

I LOVE THAT!

Waiting for your new Bumper Sticker:
HOLD YOUR NOSE AND USE YOUR BRAIN ... Vote Democrat!

Report this

By Malcolm Martin, June 15, 2007 at 11:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Republican Party is no longer of any use to the ruling class. It’s formula of white supremacy and posturing towards religious fundamentalism no longer works in the electoral arena. Before we celebrate their demise though consider that elections and bourgeois democracy are no longer of any use to the ruling class either. The looming threat of an attack on Iran abroad and a martial law declaration at home are indications of this development.

Capitalism’s contradictory impulses have begun bumping into each other. It’s happening in the national debate on immigration and it happened in the recent Dubai Ports World controversy. Profits are the system’s lifeblood so the ruling class craves an immigrant guest worker program and the United Arab Emirates’ petrodollars but the rabid anti-immigrant and anti-Arab sentiment coursing through U.S. society has so far blocked their designs. Racism and xenophobia and every other tactic of division have been the guarded carefully by capitalism with good reason. Unity of the working class is the only potentially deadly threat to this system. White supremacy, Black Nationalism, religious fundamentalism, sexism, homophobia, and all the crackpot schemes and the nihilistic cults of the bourgeoisie, like al-Qaeda, are dead ends for all of us who work.

Report this

By Michael Boldin, June 15, 2007 at 11:01 am Link to this comment

Whether you like conservative ideals or not, this incarnation of the Republican party has nothing, whatsoever, to do with being conservative, or following the constitution. 

I think they’d be more at home in Stalin’s government than the one that Washington, Jefferson and the rest created.

But, that’s the sham of politics - fraud.

Some follow up reading if you’re interested:

“Where have all the conservatives gone?”
http://www.populistamerica.com/where_have_all_the_conservatives_gone

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 15, 2007 at 9:40 am Link to this comment

Unless blind party loyalty devolves, and real issues are never addressed, we will continue on the path of status quo, the sameness of Republicans and Republican lite.  Doomed to follow the blind lemmings over the cliff, for the piper is greed. 

Both parties only offer three possibilities for change, Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 15, 2007 at 9:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Let me see…It looks like the Goldwater and Rockerfeller Republicans, which used to be at each others’ throats have merged realizing that they alone are the carriers of the legacy of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt.

Then there are the religious right—most fundamentalist Christians, some orthodox Jews, and conservative Catholics who want a religous-based government that teaches The Bible in public schools, councils prayer and abstinence as effective (!) means of birth control, and sees nothing wrong with using public money for churches, and wants laws that restrict any criticism of them or religion.  The American Taliban.

Then there are the racists.  They left the Democratic party in the 60’s in droves in response to the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, and the GOP welcomed their nasty racist asses in, for the money and the votes.  Many are fundies (see above) but many are not, and many fundies aren’t racist.

Then there are Modern Feudalists.  They pretend to be libertarian but really want to ensure there are NO limits on the excesses of corporations, there are all SORTS of limits on individuals fighting off corporations, that taxes are ONLY paid by the non-wealthy, and that ANY opposition is stifled.  They are simply interested in a society with an inherited elite, where meritocracy is nothing and they live in unimaginable wealth.  George W. Bush is one of these.

Finally, there are the dupes.  They fall for the rhetoric of the Feudalists and/or the Fundies without ever questioning two things: 1) Is it in my and my family’s best interest, 2) is real or a big phony.  They also fall for another scam put out for years: Only Wimps, Commies, pussies, fags and dykes vote Democratic.  Real Men vote Republican.

Even if it kills them, their nation and their freedom.

Vote Democratic! Even if you have to hold your nose!

Report this

By Tom Doff, June 15, 2007 at 9:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Surely you jest. You don’t expect an honest answer to the question ‘What is the republican party?’, on a non-XXX rated blog, do you?

All you’ll get is: *****************************************************
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
*****************************************************

Report this

By moe, June 15, 2007 at 9:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The fact is that the republican party is a group of people who live in a separate reality. They find acceptance to their lunacy from other lunatics who want acceptance. These in turn are used by a smaller percent of very wealthy people/corps.

The bottom line is ‘I support your lunacy if you support mine’. We lunatics stick together and let’s see what happens?

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, June 15, 2007 at 8:38 am Link to this comment

I suppose, that for some, the time is right for some cold disection of the So-called Bush regime.There lies, misdirections, and how they led the American public down the road to Galipoli.

Unforunately, there are still a sizeable group of people that support Mr. Bush, and will do so no matter what happens.

There are also plenty of Democrats who support the Bush adminstration and his legislation, at this point in time, the only thing clear about our political process with Republican or Democrat is that it doesn’t work anymore.

That our cherished beliefs, in freedom, justice and equality have been up for safe, to the highest bidder, is crystal clear as never before.

Slavery has been gone since the civil war, yet the mentality remains, the belief that it’s allright to create a hegemony based on wealth and privledge, that other’s aren’t deserving of a decent living and health, because they aren’t as fortuante, is alive and well in Washington.

Their minions, in power in both parties have served those interests well during the Bush administration, gutting the middle class, and letting their corporate overseers feed off the blood of the people, just like medieval kings.

Report this

By Enemy of State, June 15, 2007 at 8:02 am Link to this comment

Its about time this unholy coalition comes apart. Originally
the evangelicals were used as an easy to capture voting block, with little more than lip-service given to their demands. But eventually as they acquired veto power on candidates moderate republicans had to make the choice of compromising their principals or quitting the party. For a professional politician who has invested hugely in his relationship to a party that is usually a career ender.

Report this

By Skruff, June 15, 2007 at 6:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yeap, EJ the Republicans don’t have much, but they do have one trump card…. The Democrats are also in transition from the party of the working class, to the party of cheap illegal labor.

A pox on both houses!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.