Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
July 26, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

The Unwomanly Face of War

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Email this item Print this item

Hurricane Season:  The Readiness Is All

Posted on Jun 12, 2007

Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana and other areas of the southern U.S. in late August 2005.

By Chris Mooney

We’re just two weeks into the official Atlantic hurricane season, and already it’s looking like it could be a rough one. The first named storm, Andrea, formed off the coast of Florida in May, unusually early in the year. The second storm, Barry, spun up unexpectedly on June 1 in the Gulf of Mexico. Not since 1908 have two separate storms formed so early in the Atlantic. Neither Andrea nor Barry reached hurricane strength, but together they may hint at an atmosphere-ocean system that’s ripe for further storm development.

Square, Story page, 2nd paragraph, mobile
Indeed, every major pre-season hurricane forecast for the past several months has called for a busy year. The well-known Colorado State University forecasting team, comprised of Ph.D. student Phil Klotzbach and famed hurricane scientist William Gray, recently predicted 17 total named storms, nine of them hurricanes and five of them intense hurricanes (Categories 3 to 5), along with a heightened risk of an intense U.S. hurricane landfall. These forecasts have been wrong in the past, and especially last year, when an unexpected El Niño event in the Pacific Ocean helped suppress Atlantic hurricanes. But there are reasons for thinking the seasonal forecasters are not off base this time around. El Niño has gone away; its opposite, La Niña—which favors busy Atlantic hurricane years—may be setting in. Meanwhile, we’re in an undisputed active period for Atlantic storms, associated with warm tropical ocean temperatures, that began in 1995 and shows no sign of abating. If we don’t get hit hard this year, we will soon enough; there’s little doubt about this in the hurricane research community.

And it gets potentially worse. The current consensus of scientific experts, epitomized by reports from the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is that global warming is going to alter hurricanes. Scientists don’t know precisely how, but it probably won’t be in a way that makes them more friendly. The storms are generally expected to be more intense on average (though not necessarily more numerous) and to rain more. Ongoing sea level rise will further ensure that they penetrate farther inland when making landfall. Wind, rain, storm surges: that pretty much covers all the chief sources of hurricane damage. Indeed, we may have seen a hint of how global warming could change hurricanes last week when Cyclone Gonu became the first recorded Category 5 storm in the Arabian Sea, and went on to cause considerable death and destruction in Oman and Iran. Of late the hurricane-global warming debate has shifted to focus on the Atlantic in particular, where some scientists believe that climate change is also driving an increase in the total number of storms (though other experts question that conclusion).

In the U.S., all of this ought to worry us not a little, because our vulnerability to hurricanes is staggering. Hurricane Katrina revealed one—but only one—area of massive exposure. If a powerful hurricane hits the tough-to-evacuate Florida Keys, or tears over the state’s inland Lake Okeechobee, driving its waters toward the dike that protects people from the lake (as happened in 1928), we could see even more deaths than we saw in New Orleans two years ago.

Loss of life is the worst thing we must fear from these storms, but loss of property and infrastructure can also be considerable. If struck by an intense hurricane, major cities like Miami, Houston and Tampa Bay could see Katrina-scale tragedies, with damages totaling in the tens of billions of dollars—or even, in the case of Miami, over $100 billion. (The estimated damage total if the devastating 1926 Miami hurricane were to occur today is a staggering $164 billion.) Glancing up the East Coast, meanwhile, we also have to worry about Savannah, Charleston, much of North Carolina and especially the Outer Banks ... all the way up to New York City, which has been hit directly by a hurricane in the past and will be again one day. During the 1938 storm dubbed the “Long Island Express,” downtown Providence, R.I., was under water.


Square, Site wide, Desktop


Square, Site wide, Mobile
As these details suggest, many U.S. cities have been pummeled by strong hurricanes in the past, but we have made ourselves considerably more vulnerable than we were back in the 1920s and  ‘30s. As the National Hurricane Center notes, as of 1990, 85 percent of U.S. coastal residents had never experienced a major hurricane landfall. Since that time, the number of these inexperienced residents has only increased, as what some hurricane scientists dub our “lemming-like march to the sea” has proceeded apace. Today, 53 percent of the U.S. population lives within 50 miles of a coastline.

In essence, then, as hurricane season approaches this year, and looking forward to future years as well, we must survey a troubling canvas. It’s a picture dotted with short-term and long-term risks; but also with a heavy smattering of chance layered everywhere and a frame of scientific uncertainty around the edges. (The figure standing in the foreground of the painting—is that George W. Bush dressed up as a shepherd?—symbolizes government incompetence, and the lack of foresight and long-term thinking.)

To respond to this troubling image, let’s begin with some indisputable premises. We all recognize that Katrina devastated New Orleans, that our government responded inadequately and that recovery is going slowly at best. Furthermore, it ought to be obvious that the woeful failure to listen to expert warnings about the vulnerability of New Orleans, and translate those warnings into some type of massive project to protect the city from an entirely predictable disaster, signals a clear lack of leadership and vision. It ought not be acceptable in America to sustain such catastrophic damage to a major city. We’re just lucky that Katrina wasn’t worse: The center of the storm missed New Orleans by a good margin.

And New Orleans is just one exposed city among many. Efforts to refortify it after Katrina, wanting though they may be, certainly exceed what is being done in other places. New Orleans has gotten all the attention, after all. Not only was it devastated, it still ranks No. 1 on the International Hurricane Research Center’s top ten list of hurricane-vulnerable places. But there are many other ways that hurricanes can hurt us, including scenarios that are almost never talked about and may even be unknown to residents of vulnerable areas. For example, a rare hurricane affected what is now modern-day San Diego in 1858, when few people lived there; a repeat of this occurrence today could be a real shocker. In 1939, a tropical storm also struck Long Beach, Calif., killing 45 people. If storms forming off the coast of Mexico can on rare occasions travel as far north as San Diego and Long Beach, might they also someday reach Los Angeles?

In the face of all this, consider an immodest proposal: Let’s move now with a national project to protect our most vulnerable areas against hurricane devastation, not just for the present, but with an eye toward our globally warmed future. We can prioritize by starting with the most exposed places and then moving down the list.

Despite all the criticism of recovery efforts, in some respects New Orleans provides a model for how to proceed. In a recent New York Times article, reporter John Schwartz detailed how the city is attempting to use the best available science to study its future vulnerability. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is using complicated computer models to reassess risk by studying a wide range of possible scenarios for storms that could hit New Orleans in the future. Variations on storm size, strength, speed, rainfall and track are all being examined, as are global warming scenarios that could modify some of these variables.

We should apply precisely this mode of analysis to our other areas of vulnerability. To some extent that’s being done already—witness this report exploring what a Category 4 storm could do to Tampa Bay, or this report exploring a bad scenario for Houston—but it ought to be a coordinated and comprehensive national project. Furthermore, once we’ve analyzed and ranked all the worst-case scenarios, tough decisions will have to be made about how to apportion resources to prevent them from happening. In the case of New Orleans, for instance, any long-term defense plan will likely involve massive engineering projects to rebuild levees and create storm barriers over water. In other places, strategies may well be different. Sure, it will all cost a fortune. But nowadays most Americans would probably view such an investment as a much better one than, say, the war in Iraq.

The underlying theme is that now, more than ever before, we’re fully equipped and able to rationally analyze risks and worst-case scenarios. Which means it will be harder and harder to make excuses if we nevertheless allow them to be realized.

Chris Mooney is Washington correspondent for Seed magazine and author of the forthcoming book “Storm World: Hurricanes, Politics, and the Battle Over Global Warming” (

Banner, End of Story, Desktop
Banner, End of Story, Mobile

Watch a selection of Wibbitz videos based on Truthdig stories:

Get a book from one of our contributors in the Truthdig Bazaar.

Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every day.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By atheo, June 15, 2007 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

Two global reports show nuclear’s rise

LONDON, June 14 Nuclear energy continues to grow as a source of baseload electricity generation around the world, including the United States, according to two new reports.

BP’s World Energy Review, an annual look at the global energy sectors, found nuclear energy was the only source without a slowed growth rate in 2006. The report, released this month, found nuclear energy output gained by 1.4 percent.

There are 436 nuclear reactors powering 16 percent of global electricity, 104 of which are in the United States, powering around 20 percent of the nation’s electricity.

That number is expected to increase as dozens of plants are in some stage of planning or construction, a nuclear boom responding to the increased demand for power, rising prices of oil and gas, and a potential charge levied on coal and other polluting fossil fuels.

“Without a price for carbon, there is no mechanism that can guide the energy system towards a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,” BP Group Chief Executive Tony Hayward wrote in the World Energy Review introduction…


If you think hurricanes are bad, try a million generations of nuclear contamination.

Report this

By MARIAM RUSSELL, June 14, 2007 at 8:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Computer models brought to you by those charmers who built the levees?

Predictions by the National Hurricaine Center that is vastly underfunded, and has no plans in place to replace a badly outdated computer system?

Depending on Homeland Security….who sent Blackwater to protect the property of corporations in New Orleans…...not to see to the rescue of the citizens?


Report this
martin weiss's avatar

By martin weiss, June 14, 2007 at 11:50 am Link to this comment

Interesting article, Chris, but I’m sure you know there will be disasters in the future for which no amount of preparedness will be adequate.
Climate change and natural and man-made disasters already hang over our heads. I advise everyone to seek high ground, the original meaning of the word Zion.

That’s why the Ayn Rand “I, me, mine” philosophy adopted by some self-described christians and the Bush admin. will never offer the single main factor in human survival: Community.
We all are going to have to be ready not only to help ourselves, but our neighbors too. That’s where the basis of true Christianity and all other mainstream religious doctrines comes in. These value systems endure because they work. In a crisis, or in foreign policy, the only viable strategy for human survival is teamwork.
And yet the Bush admin. spends more than half of non-discretionary funds on death. It seems that they’re still stuck on Eugenics. I guess that’s why they call it “Skull and Bones”.

Report this

By Louise, June 13, 2007 at 8:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“The underlying theme is that now, more than ever before, we’re fully equipped and able to rationally analyze risks and worst-case scenarios.”

WE are, but what about THEM?

“Which means it will be harder and harder to make excuses if we nevertheless allow them to be realized.”

Which is why there should be no excuse. Any more than there was before!

Are we ready for another Katrina type disaster?

Have all the republicans left Washington DC?

Is Bush still running America?

Is Cheney still running Bush?

Is Karl Rove still dictating to republican appointees in all levels of government?

Is Chertoff still running Homeland Security?

In short have we seen any indication that any of these folks are any closer to walking in the same reality the rest of the world is agonizing over?

To the contrary, as the reality of the real world encroaches in on their unraveling dictatorship based on lies and violence, greed and lust they do the only thing they know how to do.
Lie some more.

Will THEY be ready for another Katrina?


Duh ...

Report this

By MARIAM RUSSELL, June 13, 2007 at 10:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Lessons from Katrina…..

You are in the path of THE BIG ONE?

Whoa? Man, we can ¨privitize¨ this and get more gillions for our buddies.
Hey, lookit that! You can clean out all those pesky blacks or just poor people so ¨good, white, people¨ can put the land to better use, just as soon as we get rid of the junk.
If you say you are helping, enough of the people believe you that you can actually get by with obvious lies and even purposeful incompetence.

Report this

By atheo, June 13, 2007 at 9:20 am Link to this comment

More Judeo-Christian MAN dominating nature claptrap:

“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is using complicated computer models”

” massive engineering projects to rebuild levees and create storm barriers over water…it will all cost a fortune.”

These types of schemes represent socialisation of risk and privatisation of gain. Perhaps Southern Florida should become wilderness along with the barrier islands and many coastal communities.It’s time to let the market (and natural) forces deal with overpriced coastal real estate. With enough hurriane activity we could see public access to our shorelines re-established.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, June 13, 2007 at 7:40 am Link to this comment

Oh, my god, whattamI gonna do!?  It’s gonna storm.  Where can I go?  Is there gas in my car?  Where are the dogs?  “Honey, make sure you fill up today, O.K.?  T-H-E-Y said it might storm!!??”  I think I’ll just hang around here today.  Gotta get ready.  Oh, god, whattamIgonnado.  THEY said it could be bad, bad.  Is the generator ready?  Turn on the weather channel.  Is there water?  Better go to the store for batteries.  Good god!! I don’t need this.  Why, oh why does it have to storm???  THEY could be wrong, though.  Good god, I hope THEY’RE wrong. I have to go to the bathroom.  I’m not feelin’ too good.

Report this

By judi, June 13, 2007 at 5:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

tampa bay is not a city any more than san franciso bay is a city.  tampa bay is many cities and several counties….. hence ‘government coordination’ would be a ‘perfect storm’  unto itself.

Report this

By Pasque, June 12, 2007 at 10:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As a long time resident of the the number 9th most vulnerable hurrican spot, I can say without hesitations that these forecasters have abolutely no idea what will happen during the hurricane season.  In fact, I would dare say that if you or I ran our jobs at their percent error, we would be fired after the first day.  Hurricanes will always hit here in NC, that’s a fact.  However, overblown reports like these only add to the hysteria of hurricanes.  They move slow enough that everyone can make it out of safely, the rest of the stuff left behind is just that, stuff.  Natural disasters occur all over the world, you should be educated about what do to do, but you cannot live your life with such doomsday advice from articles like this.  And remember , these guys are wrong about oh, 99% of the time.

Report this

By euni84, June 12, 2007 at 3:35 pm Link to this comment

The Iraq war is affecting the progress of many things in the world today, which unfortunately includes rebuilding the already disrupted regions. If people don’t think that the war is affecting them, they need only look to the hurricane affected regions.

According to the Borgen Project, $340 billion has already been spent in Iraq and we have a $522 billion military budget. What has resulted from that money? Aside from spending it domestically, the money would be better spent on plans such as the UN Millennium Development Goals to end global poverty. Just $19 billion annually can end starvation and malnutrition.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook