![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Stop Blaming the SystemPosted on Jun 12, 2007By E.J. Dionne WASHINGTON—We have become political hypochondriacs. We seem eager to declare that “the system” has come down with some dread disease, to proclaim that an ideological “center” blessed by the heavens no longer exists, and woe unto us. An imperfect immigration bill is pulled from the Senate floor and you’d think the Capitol dome had caved in. It’s all nonsense, but it is not harmless nonsense. The tendency to blame the system is a convenient way of leaving no one accountable. Those who offer this argument can sound sage without having to grapple with the specifics of any piece of legislation. There is the unspoken assumption that wisdom always lies in the political middle, no matter how unsavory the recipe served up by a given group of self-proclaimed centrists might be. And when Republicans and Democrats are battling each other with particular ferocity, there is always a call for the appearance of an above-the-battle savior who will seize the presidency as an independent. This messiah, it is said, will transcend such “petty” concerns as philosophy or ideology. Finally, those who attack the system don’t actually want to change it much. For example, there’s a very good case for abolishing the United States Senate. It often distorts the popular will since senators representing 18 percent of the population can cast a majority of the Senate’s votes. And as Sen. John McCain said over the weekend, “The Senate works in a way that relatively small numbers can block legislation.” But many of the system-blamers in fact love Senate rules that, in principle, push senators “toward the middle” in seeking solutions. So they actually like the system more than they let on. As it happens, I wish the immigration bill’s supporters had gotten it through—not because I think this is great legislation but because some bill has to get out of the Senate so real discussions on a final proposal can begin. Notice how tepid that paragraph is. The truth is that most supporters of this bill find a lot of things in it they don’t like. The guest-worker program, in particular, strikes me as terribly flawed. The bill’s opponents, on the other hand, absolutely hate it because they see it as an effective amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants. And boy, did those opponents mobilize. In well-functioning democracies, mobilized minorities often defeat unenthusiastic majorities. And some “centrist” compromises are more coherent and politically salable than others. Neither side on the immigration issue has the popular support to get exactly what it wants. So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side. These have the effect of demobilizing the very groups that support the underlying principles of this bill. That’s not a system problem. It just happens that immigration is a hard issue that arouses real passion. Typically, advocates of the system-breakdown theory move quickly from immigration to the failure of President Bush’s Social Security proposals. Why, they ask, can’t the system “fix” entitlements? The simple truth is that a majority of Americans (I’m one of them) came to oppose President Bush’s privatization ideas. That reflected both a principled stand and a practical judgment. From our point of view, a proposal to cut benefits and create private accounts was radical, not centrist. An authentically “centrist” solution to this problem would involve some modest benefit cuts and some modest tax increases. It will happen some day. But for now, conservatives don’t want to support any tax increases. I think the conservatives are wrong, and they’d argue that they’re principled. What we have here is a political disagreement, not a system problem. We have these things called elections to settle political disagreements. Is Washington a mess? In many ways it is. The simplest explanation has to do with some bad choices made by President Bush. He started a misguided war that is now sapping his influence, he has treated Democrats as if they were infected with tuberculosis, and Republicans in Congress as if they were his valets. No wonder he’s having trouble pushing through a bill whose main opponents are his own ideological allies.
Maybe you would place blame elsewhere. But please identify some real people or real political forces and not just some faceless entity that you call the system. Please be specific, bearing in mind that when hypochondriacs misdiagnose vague ailments they don’t have, they often miss the real ones.
Previous item: He'll Always Have Albania Next item: Hurricane Season: The Readiness Is All Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Dan Dorn, June 19, 2007 at 1:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
To blame “The System” may be the accurate thing to do.
When the system is so broken that a lifelong Democrat starts to think that the Libertarian approach to federal government is a good one just because a small bad thing would be better than a bigger bad thing, then I would say that “The System” may be the problem. When you’re not sure if your vote will be counted....when your not sure if you study hard at school for a professional degree, will your job be given to a foreign worker on a visa...when your not sure that even if you did get a job, would it pay all your living expenses, even your student loan? Will the wages be so deflated by the flooding of immigrants.
NumbersUSA.com
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4094926727128068265
then “The System” might be the problem.
Report thisState government has been much more responsive to the needs of the people.
By peacefull1, June 15, 2007 at 11:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The visionaries have never and will never be found in the “middle” or the “center” or the “mainstream.” If we were to follow the sensible “mainstream” we would all be driving SUVs and eating crap @ McDonalds. Let’s not kid our selves about the “rational middle.” We can certainly rule out leadership in the Republican Party as well. Unless we are talking about leading the way in polluting, destroying and exploiting.
Report thisBy hollywood, June 14, 2007 at 2:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I blame Bush and Cheney for everything.
Report thisBy Tony B., June 14, 2007 at 6:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
JNagarya:
I was refering to social indoctrination not cultural heritage. I never spoke of defeat. I’m just looking for a more suitable alternative. Being opposed to a political duopoly and working in favor of direct democracy does not make me a fatalist. Some would say just the opposite.
But feel free to dive into conjecture as long as you like.
As for E. J., arguments framed with fallacies tend to attract ad hominem attacks.
Report thisBy JNagarya, June 14, 2007 at 12:03 am #
#77869 by Tony B. on 6/13 at 11:11 pm
(11 comments total)
Redundant, derivative and proselytizing.
Did you go to Oxford or Bob Jones, E.J.?
Couldn’t this space be used for something constructive?
This is why I cancelled my cable subscription.
The WASP perspective is nauseatingly clear.
Dionne is not WASP.
Otherwise, he’s correct. How many times in my life have I heard criticism of a particular politician sidestepped by the assertion, “It’s the system.”
That evasion is an excuse to either maintain the status quo, or to remain disengaged and do nothing.
Exactly as the above niether says nor does anything _constructive_. Because the 2000 election was stolen, we should avoid the fact that that was done by persons by instead eliminating the Electoral College.
But even then, let’s not bother learning why the Framers incorporated the Electoral College in the Constitution. They couldn’t possibly have been correct in so doing; after all, what did they know about writing constitutions?
Let’s just throw up our hands and do nothing; it’s “the system”. Let’s reinforce our helplessness: it’s “the system”. Let’s continue our excuse-making by reinforcing out sense of helplessness: it’s “the system”.
Ah, but in this case it isn’t so much the “syetem” as it is the alleged WASP E. J. Dionne.
Gratuitious and false cheap shots are oh so easy. Maturity is more difficult.
Report thisBy Tony B., June 13, 2007 at 11:11 pm #
Redundant, derivative and proselytizing.
Report thisDid you go to Oxford or Bob Jones, E.J.?
Couldn’t this space be used for something constructive?
This is why I cancelled my cable subscription.
The WASP perspective is nauseatingly clear.
By cyrena, June 13, 2007 at 5:48 pm #
I love the idea about the politicians on electric collars/leashes. Matter of fact, just thinking about it makes my day.
I’m not sure I’d wanna be wired up to them though...even through the internet. It wouldn’t work with this gang anyhow. Dick Bush shut down his government e-mail address the first year.
I don’t feel it at all impossible to work the “program” though. The Constitution that is. We’ve done it before, and it won’t cost anything compared to what we give to the Corporations and the feds. I mean, this war is throwing bad money after bad money.
My guess is we could just use the original plan to run things, and save the middle man TRILLIONS to use on OURSELVES..housing, education, health care, food, jobs, that sort of stuff.
So, I know all of the Washington copies of the U.S. Constitution might have been burned, but I still have mine. We can take turns making runs to Kinkos. Maybe if everybody had their own copies, they would realize that it isn’t a bad plan when it’s utilized.
Report thisBy Scott, June 13, 2007 at 4:33 pm #
This idea that America should go back to some founder’s notion of what the country should be seems like a waste of time. Obviously it wasn’t enough to keep things from turning out the way they have.
Seems to much like throwing good money after bad to me.
There is one notion the founders had, that god was monitoring and judging everyone’s behaviour, especially the wealthy and powerful, to ensure they wouldn’t abuse their privilege. Obviously this was a fool’s dream but it was a good one
Thankfully we now have the technology of the Internet. Just hardwire the government to it and let people log on to it like it was American idol or something.
I always thought it would be neat to wire politicians up with those collars they put on dogs to keep them in line. If their ratings fall below a certain point they get an electronic correction.
Report thisBy Nitro, June 12, 2007 at 8:36 pm #
It seems the only way we can Throw Them Out now, Since Bushit now owns our government as well, is to physically throw them out.
I still think a Million Man Long Rifle March sounds appropriate. Maybe that would show King George II that it is OUR Government. NOT HIS !
Our system IS the greatest in the world. It’s the current and past 45 year ass wipes that have marred and disgraced it.
To a Better Day…
HokeHey !
Report thisBy Leefeller, June 12, 2007 at 8:01 pm #
Throw all the bums out! Been hearing that for 30 years.
Now that would that be a real symbolic gesture.
Report thisBy Max Shields, June 12, 2007 at 7:23 pm #
If EJ was presenting a case for why people need to take responsibility and transform the system then he’d have a point. Otherwise, it’s business as usual.
Report thisBy DennisD, June 12, 2007 at 6:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
E.J. - are you referring to our system of government and the Founders original intention of having it play a very limited role in it’s citizens lives and no role in other nation’s business versus what’s its morphed itself into. Well I’ve got news for you, it certainly didn’t degenerate into what we’ve got on it’s own. The people who we’ve allowed to manipulate it under the guise of doing the publics business have largely f**ked it up. The only way to fix it is to jail the criminals serving in office and make whatever changes necessary to the “system” itself to undo the shit they’ve created. Unfortunately it requires a vigilant and informed public to accomplish these things and we’ve been systematically dumbed down as a nation to keep us servile. When enough of us say “we’re mad as hell and not going to take it anymore” then they’ll be change. Until then we’re all just pissing into the wind and writing articles like yours with little to no meaning whatsoever.
Report thisBy Terri Ann Robson, June 12, 2007 at 6:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
We all blame Gov. no matter what country/continent. And because it can never be one single entity it must be treated as POLITICIANS AS A WHOLE. Also the immigration bill is nothing more than one small part of the NorthAmerican Union strategy that a small number of people are promoting.Look to The Security and Prosperity Partnership on Whitehouse site, everything will make sense.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, June 12, 2007 at 4:58 pm #
Term limits begin at the state level.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, June 12, 2007 at 4:53 pm #
E.J. Dionne maybe figures he’ll be among the “chosen few” making it into the “lifeboats” when this Titanic “system” sinks beneath the waves of Herstory. He seems here to be trying to stifle the rising panic of the lower classes in hopes of keeping them in their always less fortunate place, until the privateers and their professional apologists are safely away.
This old Heathen has been visiting awhile with a GreatGrandDaughter. Her part in what the Hopis and others call the Purification Ceremony has taken her for now to one of the big feedlot operations called “cities,” on the Sunset shores of Turtle Island. These past few Moons have provided an up-to-date “diagnosis” of the condition our domesticated sisters’ and brothers’ condition is in.
This old medicine person can report first-hand there’s bad news and worse news. Or, depending on the scope of one’s vision, there’s good news and there’s better news. For example, “things” are going to seem to get one helluva lot worse, here in the civilized world, before they can begin to actually get better. That’s because the tame two-leggeds who’ve dug their own selves and each others’ so deeply into this horrible hole are no longer able to do the obvious commensensical thing....to-wit, just stop digging.
Stopping isn’t really organically impossible. Rather, it’s become constitutionally and institutionally (i.e. virtually) forbidden. Which is to say, the domesticated peoples have come to believe totally that they depend utterly, for their “daily bread,” on the minimum waqes they get from their tormentors (by-way-of the reign-of-terrorists plutoligarchy) “in-exchange” for digging their own mass grave....no workee no money, no money no eatee.
So it isn’t any wonder what passes for “life” inside the contraption has truly become here in these latter days, for “saints” and “sinners” alike, a dog-eat-dog proposition. It has been a “god"-eat-dog deal, of course, ever since the terminally-ill tormentors first reared their ugly heads (or was it vice-versa?) here.
Watching day-after-day the futile rushing hither-and-thither, only to end-up right back where it all started, with nothing to show for it but more degenerate “energy” spun-off from all the wasted vitality, is no picnic even for one who is only watching. The toll this seemingly interminable rat-race is taking on those being ruthlessly run in it is every bit as grievous as it is all-too-plain to see. Those paying it with their very lives, however, remain convinced they’ve no other choice. So, to all intents and purposes, they don’t have.
Yet even in people as abused as these the instincts of free wild humanity are not entirely smothered....the good news. The already frenetic yet still accelerating pace of all their otherwise pointless activity is evidence of their intuitive sense that the sooner they can get this “global” stress-to-destruct test over-with, the greater the chances at least a few of ‘em might live to tell the tale to their own GreatGrandChildren. So it’s “....full-speed ahead,” in the slap-happy words of one Jabba the Hutt Cheney), and “Every man for himself!”. It’s a sure-fire formula for catastrophic systems failure if ever there was one.
Oh yeah, what’s the better news? Just this. Us free wild natural human beings, along with All Our Relations, have got it covered. The Song ‘n’ Dance of Life Herownself has not missed a step or a note through all these trials and tribulations here. She will not lose even one of Her own, either, to the feckless and fatal machinations of those cosmic fools who thought they could tame Her and put Her “to work” for their own obnoxious selves.
Meantime, this old Indian’ll be drifting back to the High Plains, to help out at the SunDance and other Ceremonies. To all those here who’re of goodwill, and even those who maybe are not so much, don’t panic....we’ll catch y’all sooner than later.
HokaHey!
Report thisBy trueam, June 12, 2007 at 4:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The ignorance here is truly astounding!
Can anyone guess what we would do if illegals from ANY other nation came pouring into the U.S. at the rate that the Mexicans have been?? Never mind, I don’t think I can bear to hear another idiotic response.
Simple solution (although not perfect, but we’re way beyond that)
1. Forget about actively pursuing the 12-20 million that are already here, it’s a pipe dream and we’ll never get it done. Instead, go after the companies that hire illegals PERIOD. Companies will not shut down and there won’t be some kind of economic collapse. We just need to pay more to attract American workers (or immigrants who are waiting to apply for a visa to fill those jobs).
2. If any illegals are located, they must prove they have held a steady job for a specified amount of time, have American born children, and have not committed any felony (in the US or elsewhere) before they are granted TEMPORARY work status (must work toward citizenship, pay taxes and a fine). For all the other illegals...ADIOS!
3. Fortify the border by relocating as many (as feasible) of our southern Military bases and National Guard Units along the Mexican border. A permanent military presence would not only help deter illegals and drug smugglers, but it would also provide a pre-paid workforce that could help build, fortify and patrol the border fence (a dual fence line patrolled by Canine Units in Hummers (Oh yeah!). Security is never free.
4. Any illegal currently incarcerated or convicted of a felony must be immediately deported back to Mexico (preferably on Vicente Fox’s front Lawn) in order to ease our already crowded jails.
One last thought…Since Mars and Pluto are experiencing climate warming at a faster rate than the earth, can we just go ahead and blame it on big oil, or the Land Rover company (Ford) and maybe Dick Cheney too (for good measure)?
Report thisBy cyrena, June 12, 2007 at 3:04 pm #
E.J., I’m going to take you up on the discussion of names, dates and events, (because while I don’t agree with you, I do respect the argument). But for now, I’m rushing to do other work.
Meantime, Mr. Boldin gave the obvious solution, which is the one that I’ve been promoting as well....
Why don’t we just go back to actually USING the “system” that we have? The Constitution still works fine, IF somebody would USE it. We don’t have to re-invent the wheel, and the system was actually designed quite brilliantly.
So, it’s not the “system” that we’re blaming as much as the people who have failed to administer that system, based on it’s original principles and values. And, while I know that you would like to discuss names, dates, etc, etc, it just seems to me like it should be OBVIOUS.
Still, I’ll see if I can work something up for you after final exams.
Report thisBy Dale Headley, June 12, 2007 at 1:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Most of my friends don’t vote. Either that, or they simply vote the way I tell them to vote. Their excuses generally involve a distrust of “the system”. They don’t believe their vote means anything, because the whole system is rigged, they say. Al Gore is right: what’s wrong is largely our fault. This is the real danger in this country: people don’t take politics seriously; they treat it like it is a boring sideshow, and they’re much more interested in who will win on whatever-the-name-is of that show where people sing and dance and stuff. How can a democracy survive with that attitude? In the long run, it can’t; because the demagogues who seek power are becoming ever more skilled and diabolical in exploiting the lack of public involvement.
Report thisBy yours truly, June 12, 2007 at 1:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s the people and not the system? Oh, is that why, since WW II, we’ve been in one war after another, covert, overt, name it, not to mention doing nothing about global warming except steadily worsening it? No, we don’t need new leaders, we need a new system. How to get it? Troops out now, that’s how, whereupon, empowered by our victory over the powers that be (i.e., system + those who run it) we go on to change the world. What sort of system then? It’ll be up to us.
Report thisBy ~B~, June 12, 2007 at 12:33 pm #
Anyone have the weather channel? Is it snowing in hell? Not a bad article E.J. It does serve to highlight some issues.
We as a nation need to actually get to those who are to blame. Not just blame all dems or all reps we need to pay attention and remove EVERYONE from office who is guilty. Corruption, privitization, electoral activities...so many areas we need to watch to do our jobs as citizens.
B
http://b-political.blogspot.com/
Report thisBy Max Shields, June 12, 2007 at 12:05 pm #
EJ, aren’t you the fella who was last “heard” a couple of posts back blaming the “ immature left”, some nebulous self-defined group that became your convenient punching bag?
Well, there is a system and we do have structure and systemic problems. Yes, there is individual responsibility on all levels. But the system is not a THING, external to the people who work within it. All systems have a structure which limits and constrains. But no system is stagnant, systems emerge through a community of practice. But systems have, as mentioned, limits, they are defined as much by what they are not as what they are, and those limits shape the behavior of the body politics.
To say, simply, that the system is perfect, people are bad, is to say that any system is perfect and it is only the people who “use” the system who are at fault.
This is just not true. Our system encompasses an economic system based on selfishness, and non-sutainability. It promotes free trade and globalization which exploits the world’s resources, both human and natural at the expense of sustainability. This is an overdrive, pathologically determined system of endless growth, producing endless wars.
Now, the system is a designed system. Our political system, our economic and cultural systems are all human designed (not natural). So, they work as we intend them; i.e., they are NOT perfect. Please stop thinking that this is a perfect system that just needs the right “people”, like they’re going to parachute “perfect” people to manage this “perfect” system!
We can talk about solutions when you’re ready.
Report thisBy C Villarreal, June 12, 2007 at 11:42 am #
I agree with the overall analysis, but I wanted to respond to one piece because of how important it is: “So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side.”
I think this presumes that the bill actually created a real path to citizenship. It created a narrow path for a tiny percentage of the millions of undocumented immigrants - and piled on top of that were many bad concessions. Many groups on the left opposed this bill - something much of the “progressive media” is ignoring. For example, the National Lawyers Guild, LULAC, and the National Network on Immigrant Rights. Some Senators, like Barbara Boxer, ultimately put out statements against this bill from a progressive point of view. So, please stop acting as if this was a progressive bill that just happened to have a few concessions to the (bring back the Sensenbrenner bill) crowd.
http://www.shoplifters.us
Report thisBy Michael Boldin, June 12, 2007 at 11:05 am #
A solid article. If we just returned to the law - the Constitution - we wouldn’t be having all these problems.
So much of what our government does these days is in direct violation to the constitution.
That doesn’t mean rounding up illegals, or building a wall, or worker cards or any of these bills in congress. All these do is give the feds more power. Returning to the constitution reduces their power and solves our problems.
Maybe that’s why no politician is talking about doing that.
Some follow up reading:
“The Immigration Scam”
Report thishttp://www.populistamerica.com/the_immigration_scam
By THOMAS BILLIS, June 12, 2007 at 10:06 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We really have the perfect system for getting things done for the people.Our politicians far from being statesmen will do anything to get elected.If the people make their will clear this group of political whores will jump through hoops to do it.Along the way these whores have learned that they can manipulate public opinion by using loaded language that continues to get them elected and permits them to amass large amounts of money from corporate interests to run for reelection.The blame to paraphrase Shakespeare lies not in the stars but in ourselves.
Report thisBy Scott, June 12, 2007 at 8:54 am #
The “system” is just a thing, its what people do with it that counts. The people most likely to be doing things with it are powerful and or wealthy people. Lets face it power and wealth, like space and time are pretty much one and the same thing. No matter what kind of system you are discussing power/wealth becomes concentrated within them through completely natural processes.
If we the people truly want to claim that the system belongs to us then we have to get between money and “the-man” so to speak.
Outlawing secrecy and total public awareness of what politicians, burecrats and CEO’s are doing in the public domain in our name via cameras, microphones and the technology of the Internet would go a lot farther in terms of maintaining the system than voting in more of the same.
That said, power and wealth are also just things, meaning its what we’re doing with them that counts. Given all the apparent angst in the world, not much it seems.
Report thisBy dieboldcracy, June 12, 2007 at 8:48 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
this guy obviously hasn’t even read the legislation. This bill, coupled with the further dismantling of our border patrol, would be phase one of the destruction of United States sovereignty.
Report thisBy Mudwollow, June 12, 2007 at 8:47 am #
Of course we have no one to blame but ourselves. Obviously responsibility lies with the individual. While I agree with that and degree that needs to be said I also agree that the writer of this article is a pinhead.
President Bush made some bad decisions? Misguided war? Has your head than up your ass for the last few years or are you simply enjoying a case of rapidly increasing dementia?
George Bush’s agenda was in place well before he and his brownshirt goons stole the election in which they lost the popular vote. Bad decisions had nothing to do with any of the crap that’s happened since that stolen election. To characterized the Bush reign has been plagued with bad decisions exposes an infantile inability to grasp the reality staring all of us right in the face. A misguided war? Holy crap. You’re an idiot or a shill or you have a very perverted sense of humor.
Other than sadly severe brain damage it’s very difficult to see how one could characterize the Bush presidency with words such as misguided and bad decisions. George Bush is the most successful president we’ve ever had in many respects. He’s grabbed more power for the executive branch and destroyed more of the freedoms of American citizens than any of his predecessors. He’s transferred more wealth from the many to the few than anyone in the history of the world. Not bad for an average intelligence, spoiled, preppy, draft dodger with a lousy vocabulary.
Politicians and CEOs often try to worm out of their illegal and self-serving actions by claiming they just didn’t know or maybe even made some bad decisions. But instead of being jettisoned and replaced for their incompetency insist that in spite of the fact that they ran their country or Corporation into the toilet, they’re still the best ones for the job. Mr. Bush repetitively uses this mindnumbing non-logic. Reporters such as the writer of this article are no better. There really are only two choices. Either you’re a shill working for the other side or you are a hopelessly incompetent idiot. I don’t care and it doesn’t matter. There is also the remote possibility that you really are one of those bleeding heart, knee-jerk, out in left field LIBERALS we hear so much about. If that’s the case, please sit down, there’s something you need to hear. There really are bad people in the world who will screw you and laugh about it. That may hurt your feelings. Sorry. Get a dog.
Report thisBy Chaseme, June 12, 2007 at 8:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It appears E.J. has become so boxed in to the petty concerns of the job, like the Sopranos office talk, that he attempts to create a “catchy theme-political hypochondriac” instead of maybe focusing on the real topic of his discussion-inner growth and development.
What I gathered from the article is E.J.’s own sense personal growth and development. He seemed to have spent some time in therapy, like most of the intelligent white middle class now. Which explains why they personally have become so passive in starting another “movement.”
That’s right, who do you think was instrumental in the movement of the 60s and 70s? the white middle class. And, during the last thirty to forty years, that white middle class has been in therapy (hence this article and the phrase: “political hypochondriac”); throughout this time there’s been a tremendous political decline in this country.
The thing that therapy seems to push is relationship. Yet, some work may matter just as well. Right E.J.? Most people think they are going to die if they are not in a good relationship. They may feel intense bouts of longing and loneliness.
But those feelings are not only due to poor relationship; they come also because you’re not in any kind of political community that makes sense, which matters. Therapy pushes the relationship issues, but what intensifies those issues is that we don’t have (a) satisfactory work or (b), even more important perhaps, we don’t have a satisfactory political community.
So, maybe we all suffer from a little Hypochondrosis, but are there really a thing as “political hypochondriac”?
I think not.
Report thisBy Thomas Ward, June 12, 2007 at 8:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We have come down with a dread disease. It is LAWLESSNESS. The notoin that law is a nicity, only to be followed when the roses are in bloom. Folks, what we are talking about is kidnapping and torturing religious leaders. Would the bushmen kidnap and torture a Catholic Priest to find out the details of the confessions of a mob boss, or perhaps the family situation of one of their political rivals?? Maybe they would want to threaten to torture poll workers to keep them quiet about stolen elections. Once these germs of human degredation are let lose, those who lust for power will want to put this contageon to work on their behalf just as they used anthrax to further their political ambitions of conquest and empire.
Report thisBy Pragmatique, June 12, 2007 at 6:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The problem with immigration is that we don’t need it. I believe that all immigration into the US should be suspended until comprehensive scientific studies are done detailing the carrying capacity of our land, water supplies, waste disposal, traffic congestion, air quality, educational system, and penal institutions, among other vital concerns. The notion that we’re somehow “required” by some moral imparitive to admit people is absurd. Our first responsibility is to future generations of citizens currently here, and also to the wonderful and bountiful land that we’ve inherited. To spoil it with political policies fostering over population is unconscionable and immoral.
Report thisBy Lefty, June 12, 2007 at 6:18 am #
Once again, E.J. Dionne proves that he is a pinhead of the highest order. This article is yet another typical example of idiot journalism. E.J. thinks he has a catchy theme - political hypochondriac - and so, to impress his fellow pinhead journalists, he constructs a non-existent universe to fit his fantasy theme.
Another brain fart from E.J. “Zippy” Dionne, the political journalism tapeworm!
Report thisBy KISS, June 12, 2007 at 6:05 am #
The system is broken and will be as long as corporate lap-dogs are in power. Until a ban on big money comes into existence nothing much will happen for the citizens who elect these bums. How many senators can you name that doesn’t have a secret agenda and is supporting millions of give-away-money for some corporate scheme? Long ago corporations realized that presidents alone could not do their bidding, hence, the senate was the place to control.
Report thisWith only a 2 party system control is an easy task...just give money to both sides.
By Skruff, June 12, 2007 at 5:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
E.J. Dionne fails to make a coherant case that the system is sound, The gist of the article says we should stop blaming it.
While I agree that my countrymen and women have become a nation of whiners, continually looking for a savior, the system has problems. The greatest systematic flaw is that This system presupposes that the citizens who employ government have some backbone, wisdom, and memory.
Those who would blame GWB for all things wrong with this nation fail to remember. Privatization was not a GWB idea. He continued it. It has been around at least since Nixon, who bemoaned the evils of regulation....particularly regulation of the oil indrustry. Carter deregulated the airlines and the Phone Company, Reagan took it a step further and pushed for privatization of governmental services.
So it’s broke. What do we do? A little backbone would let us bet on candidates like Ron Paul, or Dennis Kucinich. but with corporate sponsors (the same folks who gave you NAFTA, WTO, and unimpeded China trade have selected Hill-The-Shill Clinton, Or John (We-need-a-war) McCain. Soon to be displaced by Bill (I-know-what’s best for Terri Schivo) Frist.
I may move to another country if we get these bums.
Wisdom is listening to others but not being led. Do you read only left-wing stuff? Only watch Fox? One can know the complete mantra of one wing and still not be wise.
It is the system, but it is also us. If you fail to maintain machinery, it will malfunction, or quit.
Report this