LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Dateline: Iraq - Anna Badkhen and Sarah Stillman on Assignment
 
May 17, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
Whose Toes Are Those?

Whose Toes Are Those?

By Jabari Asim
$6.99

more items

 
Reports

Looking Back on 40 Years of Occupation

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 3, 2007
Israeli guard tower
AP Photo / Emilio Morenatti

With part of Israel’s security barrier in the background, a Palestinian woman shops for produce near the Kalandia checkpoint between Jerusalem and the West Bank city of Ramallah in April 2005.

By Chris Hedges

Israel captured and occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank 40 years ago this week.  The victory was celebrated as a great triumph, at once tripling the size of the land under Israeli control, including East Jerusalem.  It was, however, a Pyrrhic victory.  As the occupation stretched over the decades, it transformed and deformed Israeli society.  It led Israel to abandon the norms and practices of a democratic society until, in the name of national security, it began to routinely accept the brutal violence of occupation and open discrimination and abuse of Palestinians, including the torture of prisoners and collective reprisals for Palestinians attacks.  Palestinian neighborhoods, olive groves and villages were, in the name of national security, bulldozed into the ground.

Israel’s image has shifted from that of a heroic, open society set amid a sea of despotic regimes to that of an international pariah.  Israel’s West Bank separation barrier, built ostensibly to keep out Palestinian bombers, has also been used to swallow huge tracts of the West Bank into Israel.  Palestinian towns are ringed by Israeli checkpoints.  Major roads in the West Bank are reserved for Israeli settlers.  The U.N. estimates that about half the West Bank is now off-limits to Palestinians.  And every week there are new reports of Palestinian produce that is held up until it rots, pregnant women giving birth in cars because they cannot get to hospitals, and even senseless and avoidable deaths, such as one young woman who died recently when she couldn’t get through a checkpoint to her kidney dialysis treatment.

“We are raising commanders who are policemen,” former Israeli General Amiram Levine told the newspaper Maariv. “We ask them to excel at the checkpoint. What does it means to excel at the checkpoint?  It means being enough of a bastard to delay a pregnant woman from getting to the hospital.”

The occupation was benign at the beginning.  Israelis crossed into Palestinian territory to buy cheap vegetables, eat at local restaurants, spend the weekend in the desert oasis of Jericho and get their cars fixed.  The Palestinians were a pool of cheap labor and by the mid-1980s, 40 percent of the Palestinian workforce was employed in Israel.  The Palestinians flowed over the border to the shops and beaches of Tel Aviv.  But the second-class status of Palestinians, growing repression by Israeli authorities in the West Bank and Gaza and festering poverty saw Palestinians, most of them too young to remember the moment of occupation, rise up in December 1987 to launch six years of street protests.  The uprising eventually led to a peace accord between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization led by Yasir Arafat.  Arafat, who had spent most of his life in exile, returned in triumph to Gaza. 

The Oslo Accords that followed momentarily heralded a new era, a moment of hope.  I was in Gaza when they were signed.  The Gaza Strip was awash in a giddy optimism.  Palestinian businessmen who had made their fortunes abroad returned to help build the new Palestinian state.  The radical Islamists seemed to shrink away.  Palestinian women threw off their head scarves and beauty salons sprouted on city streets.  There was a brief and shining sense that life could be normal, free from strife and violence, that finally Palestinians had a future.  But it all swiftly turned sour.  The 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, coupled with mounting draconian restrictions on Palestinians to prevent them from entering Israel and keep them in submission, led to another uprising in 2000.  This one, which I also covered for The New York Times, was far more violent.  This latest uprising has led to the deaths of more than 4,300 Palestinians and 1,100 Israelis.  It ushered in an Israeli policy that saw Jewish settlers relocated from Gaza.  Gaza was then sealed off like a vast prison.  Israel also began to build a security barrier—at a cost of about $ 1 million per mile—in the West Bank.  When it is done, the barrier is expected to incorporate 40 percent of Palestinian land into the Israeli state. 

Israeli air strikes have, over the past year, decimated the infrastructure in Gaza, destroying bridges, power stations and civilian administration buildings.  The breakdown in law and order, coupled with the growing desperation in Gaza, has triggered an internecine conflict between Hamas and Fatah.  There are some 200 Palestinians who have died in clashes and street fighting between the two factions during the past year—more than one-third of those killed by Israel during the same period. 

The Israeli abuses have been well documented, not only by international human rights organizations, but Israeli human rights groups such as B’Tselem.  On June 4, 2007, Amnesty International released a new 45-page report called “Enduring Occupation: Palestinians Under Siege in the West Bank,” which again illustrates the devastating impact of four decades of Israeli military occupation. The report documents the relentless expansion of unlawful settlements on occupied land.  It details the ways Israel has seized or denied crucial resources, such as water, to Palestinians under occupation.  It documents a plethora of measures that confine Palestinians to fragmented enclaves and hinder their access to work, health and education facilities. These measures include the 700-kilometer barrier or wall, more than 500 checkpoints and blockades, and a complicated system of permits to heavily restrict movement.

“Palestinians living in the West Bank are blocked at every turn. This is not simply an inconvenience—it can be a matter of life or death.  It is unacceptable that women in labor, sick children, or victims of accidents on their way to hospital should be forced to take long detours and face delays which can cost them their lives,” said Malcolm Smart, director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Program. 

“International action is urgently needed to address the widespread human rights abuses being committed under the occupation, and which are fueling resentment and despair among a predominantly young and increasingly radicalized Palestinian population,” said Smart.  “For 40 years, the international community has failed to adequately address the Israeli-Palestinian problem; it cannot, must not, wait another 40 years to do so.”

Of Gaza’s 1.4 million residents, a staggering 1.1 million now depend on outside food assistance.  The World Food Program has identified Gaza as one of the world’s hunger global hot spots.  The WFP is a principal food aid provider to Palestinians, providing assistance to 640,000 Palestinians, more than a third of them in Gaza.

The desperation—with young men unable to find work, travel outside the Gaza Strip or West Bank and forced to sleep 10 to a room in concrete hovels without running water—has empowered the Islamic radicals.  The desperation has led the Palestinian population, once one of the most secular in the Middle East, to turn to radical fundamentalism.  The more pressure and violence Israel employs, the more these radicals are empowered.

The Israeli lobby in the United States is captive to the far right of Israeli politics.  It exerts influence not on behalf of the Jewish state but an ideological strain within Israel that believes it can crush Palestinian aspirations through force.  The self-defeating policies of the Bush administration are mirrored in the self-defeating policies championed by the hard-right administration of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem.  Israel flouts international law and dismisses Security Council resolutions to respect the integrity of Palestinian territory.  It has instead trapped Palestinians in squalid, barricaded ghettos where they barely survive. 

It is not in Israel’s interest—or our own—to continue to fuel increased Palestinian strife and rising militancy.  Economic sanctions and an arms ban against Israel are our last hope.  These were the tools that toppled the apartheid regime in South Africa.  And it was, after all, the sanctions imposed by the first President Bush—he suspended $10 billion of loan guarantees for resettling Russian immigrants in Israel—that prodded right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to attend peace talks in Madrid.

A trade embargo—even if imposed only by European states—would be a start.  It is outside pressure that can alone halt the inexorable slide into a conflict that could become regional.  And a new regional conflict with Israel could spell the end of the Zionist experiment in the Middle East.  It may be quixotic, perhaps even impossible, but it is the last measure left to save Israel from itself.

Chris Hedges is a veteran journalist and former Mideast bureau chief for The New York Times. His most recent book is “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America.”

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Satire: Hillary Tries to Fatten Up the Competition

Next item: Sentencing for Dummies

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Comment Pages: «5 6 7 8

By 7man, June 4, 2007 at 1:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Neanderthals also were forced out of Isreal before it had a name. Even the Neanderthals in D.C aren’t suggesting that they return to this ancient homeland despite the fact the they once had a nice cave overlooking the Dead Sea.

Reply to this | Report this

By lilmamzer, June 4, 2007 at 12:41 pm #
(871 comments total)

#75242 by Frikken Kids: Does this give them eternal claim to that particular patch of desert?  No.  Does that excuse their barbaric treatment of the Palestinians?  Not even close.

I am a secularist and a Jewish nationalist. I do not take what the Bible says literally at all. But the fact is that Israel always was and always will be the homeland of the Jewish nation. There has been an unbroken presence of Jews in their land since the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans in 70 CE, and the majority of today’s Israeli Jews are part of the 800,000 disposessed refugees from Arab nations who resettled in Israel and made productive lives for themselves. And even now they have to endure the barbaric treatment at the hands of the Arabs again as Sderot is bombarded daily by missiles from Jew-free Gaza. There is tremendous historical significance in this, and it is not lost on Jews in Israel and around the world. The “barbaric treatment” you speak of is mis-directed, but you would have to be a true student of history to understand that, not just a mouthpiece regurgitating far-left memes and slogans. The Arabs have 22 independent nations states comprising 250,000,000 people spreading across nearly 5,000 miles of territory. The Jews have a legitimate claim to self-determination on one tiny spot of land for only 7 million citizens, and their fight for survival is a story of freedom, justice, and liberty that cannot be drowned out by the demonization of people like Hedges or you.

Reply to this | Report this

By lilmamzer, June 4, 2007 at 12:29 pm #
(871 comments total)

#75234 by Matt: There is no “right” of people to create national states based on ethnicity.

It is a right that the Jewish people reserve for themselves. It’s called self-determination. When you argue as vehemently for the delegitimization of Portugal, Sri Lanka, France, Norway, South Africa, Egypt, Iran, Mexico, and any other nation on the planet, I will listen to you. But when you single out the Jews, it is only the sound of a bigot that is heard.

================================================
#75234 by Matt: There is no secular legal or moral authority for the concept that America Jews who move to the West Bank are living in their “homeland.” It’s just your stupid ethnic/religious ideology, which no one else is compelled to share.

Nobody is compelling or even asking you to “share” anything. Don’t like Israel? Who the fuck cares, don’t go there. Thanks for calling the Jewish people their and their millenia-old culture and history “stupid”. That is a very learned and erudite opinion and certainly qualifies you as an intellect among intellects.

Reply to this | Report this

By Daoud Ali, June 4, 2007 at 11:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Excellent article.  Unpopular or not, the truth is still the truth.  Respect.

Reply to this | Report this

By Hammo, June 4, 2007 at 10:42 am #
(372 comments total)

As Hedges indicates, sometimes there is “blowback” to various policies and actions.

Negative unintended consequences can be quite significant or severe, obvious or subtle. Victims of abuse can become perpetrators of abuse.

Some of the factors relating to Hedges observations are touched on in the article:

“Psychology and the human heart are keys in winning the war, the peace”

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle. asp?articleID=3350

Reply to this | Report this

By Frikken Kids, June 4, 2007 at 9:51 am #
(64 comments total)

To lilmamzer,

Just because a book of fairy tales says that Isreal is the promised land of the Jews doesn’t make it so.  Biblical Isreal ceased to exist before 700 BC.  That’s 2700 years ago!  And in the bible, where you can read the Jewish version of how they came to their promised land, we find out that they only came to occupy the land by slaughtering hundreds of thousands of people (women and children included) to purify the land.

Does this give them eternal claim to that particular patch of desert?  No.  Does that excuse their barbaric treatment of the Palestinians?  Not even close. 

Now quick, since I think their behavior is monsterous, call me an anti-semite before somebody else does!  Hedges too, that bastard!  Say it loud:  It’s THIER LAND!  GOD GAVE IT TO THEM!!!!

Reply to this | Report this

By Matt, June 4, 2007 at 9:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hear James Yell: “The root of the problem is the refusal to recognize the right of Jews to self-determination in their own homeland.”

There is no “right” of people to create national states based on ethnicity. There is no secular legal or moral authority for the concept that America Jews who move to the West Bank are living in their “homeland.” It’s just your stupid ethnic/religious ideology, which no one else is compelled to share.

And there is CERTAINLY no reason that the US government should be required to serve as the financial and military guarantor of “success” for your ridiculous ethno-nationalist project.

Yell, James, as loud as you want - but you will never turn your nonsense into sense.

Reply to this | Report this

By kiskiminetas, June 4, 2007 at 8:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Raphael Lemkin is the Polish-Jewish jurist who, having fled the Nazi invasion of Poland for refuge in the U.S., coined the word “genocide” in 1943. He defined genocide as:

“A coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”

Exactly what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians, in broad daylight.  Jews committing genocide.  That’s how badly they want all of Palestine.

How do Israelis get away with this?  This is the question that needs to be asked.  And answered.

Reply to this | Report this

By lilmamzer, June 4, 2007 at 8:48 am #
(871 comments total)

Hedges writes his usual hatchet job and the Truthdig chorus swells in appreciation.
Actually, the so-called occupation is perfectly legal and necessary, given that Israel fought a defensive war against enemies who openly stated their genocidal intentions.
The root of the problem is the refusal to recognize the right of Jews to self-determination in their own homeland. The Arabs made pogroms against the Jews in Hebron and Jerusalem in 1929, slaughtering hundreds. They made war in 1948 and for decades afterwards. They have 22 nation-states and continue to deny the legitimacy of the tiny single state the Jews claim as their own. Hedges seems to find this central fact too unimportant to mention. That’s why he is a bigoted hack. The tragic irony is that the so-called Palestinian Arabs could have had their 23rd Arab nation-state when it was offered as part of the UN Partition Plan in 1947, but they preferred attempted genocide of the Jews instead. They lost. Mutual recognition of two states for two peoples was accepted by Israel. Rejected by the Arabs. That’s the truth not reported in Truthdig. Hedges would have us believe Israel is illegitimate for having the balls to find ways to survive and thrive as a free and democratic society despite the odds. He is wrong.

Reply to this | Report this

By James Yell, June 4, 2007 at 6:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Why should Isreal be held to a different standard than say Turkey, which has occupied Greek land by force for decades? The fact remains that in an area that last was ruled by its occupants, it was the Jews who lived on this land and had a government of their own almost 2000 years ago. They were forced out of their land by the Babylon, they returned and then they were forced out by the Romans. They came home, bought land and were determined to have their own homeland again. The Moslems living in the area did not ever rule themselves. It wasn’t until about 1000 years ago that the Moslems overwhelmed the Greco-Roman governments of the area and the land was ruled from outside ever since until the time that Isreal declared its independence. The resident moslems did not ask to create a united government with the Jews, but left their homes largely ahead of invading moslem armies, in hopes the Jews would be driven into the sea. Forty years ago a war was started again by Islam and the Jews finished it. It would be nice if a civil government could be formed, but it is on the heads of Islam to accept the Jewish State and their own part in their present misery. It will take either a high crime, or a rational agreement between the Jews and Moslems to effect peace. I for one would not ask Isreal to trust, until such time that Islam talks about peace with deeds instead of as a way to obscure their hostility until they can gain the upper hand.

Reply to this | Report this

By Matt, June 4, 2007 at 6:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Great essay, Chris! Tony Karon, a senior editor for Time.com, also wrote a beautiful essay that comes to much the same conclusion.

Mr. Karon, who is South African-born and Jewish, posted the essay on his blog site, which is called “Rootless Cosmopolitan”.

Article: “How the 1967 War Doomed Israel” by Tony Karon:

http://tonykaron.com/2007/06/03/how-the-1967-war-doome d-israel/

Reply to this | Report this

By Crimson Ghost, June 4, 2007 at 4:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Unfortunately the evil done by the Israel lobby far exceeds muzzling criticism of that nation’s savage brutality towards the Palestinians.

9/11, the Iraq war, threats to bomb Iran, the spread of terrorism throughout the Middle East, the erosion of civil liberties at home—would any of this have happened absent the sinister influence of powerful Israel firsters in both parties.

Reply to this | Report this

By Tom Doff, June 4, 2007 at 3:27 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Speaking of the ‘Law of Unintended Consequences’, the Israeli/zionist future is a perfect example that, in addition to often turning out badly, the Law occasionally results in unexpected outcomes of Truth, Justice and Fairness.

Can anyone imagine a long-term future for Israel/zionism that will enable them to survive as an entity, controlling the walled-in lands they have stolen? Enable them to continue as a controlling power of the middle-east, even with their shadowy, off-stage threat of nuclear arms?

The very best they can hope for is self-immolation, self-annihilation in the process of trying to annihilate their enemies. They have so alienated the world, they have become pariahs, deservedly. They have so hated those who disagree, they have become Nazies.

They will soon become proof that their concept of ‘God’s Will’, is fallacious.

Reply to this | Report this
Comment Pages: «5 6 7 8

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.