![]() |
|
||
|
Looking Back on 40 Years of OccupationPosted on Jun 3, 2007
By Chris Hedges Israel captured and occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank 40 years ago this week. The victory was celebrated as a great triumph, at once tripling the size of the land under Israeli control, including East Jerusalem. It was, however, a Pyrrhic victory. As the occupation stretched over the decades, it transformed and deformed Israeli society. It led Israel to abandon the norms and practices of a democratic society until, in the name of national security, it began to routinely accept the brutal violence of occupation and open discrimination and abuse of Palestinians, including the torture of prisoners and collective reprisals for Palestinians attacks. Palestinian neighborhoods, olive groves and villages were, in the name of national security, bulldozed into the ground. “We are raising commanders who are policemen,” former Israeli General Amiram Levine told the newspaper Maariv. “We ask them to excel at the checkpoint. What does it means to excel at the checkpoint? It means being enough of a bastard to delay a pregnant woman from getting to the hospital.” The occupation was benign at the beginning. Israelis crossed into Palestinian territory to buy cheap vegetables, eat at local restaurants, spend the weekend in the desert oasis of Jericho and get their cars fixed. The Palestinians were a pool of cheap labor and by the mid-1980s, 40 percent of the Palestinian workforce was employed in Israel. The Palestinians flowed over the border to the shops and beaches of Tel Aviv. But the second-class status of Palestinians, growing repression by Israeli authorities in the West Bank and Gaza and festering poverty saw Palestinians, most of them too young to remember the moment of occupation, rise up in December 1987 to launch six years of street protests. The uprising eventually led to a peace accord between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization led by Yasir Arafat. Arafat, who had spent most of his life in exile, returned in triumph to Gaza. The Oslo Accords that followed momentarily heralded a new era, a moment of hope. I was in Gaza when they were signed. The Gaza Strip was awash in a giddy optimism. Palestinian businessmen who had made their fortunes abroad returned to help build the new Palestinian state. The radical Islamists seemed to shrink away. Palestinian women threw off their head scarves and beauty salons sprouted on city streets. There was a brief and shining sense that life could be normal, free from strife and violence, that finally Palestinians had a future. But it all swiftly turned sour. The 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, coupled with mounting draconian restrictions on Palestinians to prevent them from entering Israel and keep them in submission, led to another uprising in 2000. This one, which I also covered for The New York Times, was far more violent. This latest uprising has led to the deaths of more than 4,300 Palestinians and 1,100 Israelis. It ushered in an Israeli policy that saw Jewish settlers relocated from Gaza. Gaza was then sealed off like a vast prison. Israel also began to build a security barrier—at a cost of about $ 1 million per mile—in the West Bank. When it is done, the barrier is expected to incorporate 40 percent of Palestinian land into the Israeli state. Israeli air strikes have, over the past year, decimated the infrastructure in Gaza, destroying bridges, power stations and civilian administration buildings. The breakdown in law and order, coupled with the growing desperation in Gaza, has triggered an internecine conflict between Hamas and Fatah. There are some 200 Palestinians who have died in clashes and street fighting between the two factions during the past year—more than one-third of those killed by Israel during the same period. Advertisement “Palestinians living in the West Bank are blocked at every turn. This is not simply an inconvenience—it can be a matter of life or death. It is unacceptable that women in labor, sick children, or victims of accidents on their way to hospital should be forced to take long detours and face delays which can cost them their lives,” said Malcolm Smart, director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Program. “International action is urgently needed to address the widespread human rights abuses being committed under the occupation, and which are fueling resentment and despair among a predominantly young and increasingly radicalized Palestinian population,” said Smart. “For 40 years, the international community has failed to adequately address the Israeli-Palestinian problem; it cannot, must not, wait another 40 years to do so.” Of Gaza’s 1.4 million residents, a staggering 1.1 million now depend on outside food assistance. The World Food Program has identified Gaza as one of the world’s hunger global hot spots. The WFP is a principal food aid provider to Palestinians, providing assistance to 640,000 Palestinians, more than a third of them in Gaza. The desperation—with young men unable to find work, travel outside the Gaza Strip or West Bank and forced to sleep 10 to a room in concrete hovels without running water—has empowered the Islamic radicals. The desperation has led the Palestinian population, once one of the most secular in the Middle East, to turn to radical fundamentalism. The more pressure and violence Israel employs, the more these radicals are empowered. The Israeli lobby in the United States is captive to the far right of Israeli politics. It exerts influence not on behalf of the Jewish state but an ideological strain within Israel that believes it can crush Palestinian aspirations through force. The self-defeating policies of the Bush administration are mirrored in the self-defeating policies championed by the hard-right administration of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem. Israel flouts international law and dismisses Security Council resolutions to respect the integrity of Palestinian territory. It has instead trapped Palestinians in squalid, barricaded ghettos where they barely survive. It is not in Israel’s interest—or our own—to continue to fuel increased Palestinian strife and rising militancy. Economic sanctions and an arms ban against Israel are our last hope. These were the tools that toppled the apartheid regime in South Africa. And it was, after all, the sanctions imposed by the first President Bush—he suspended $10 billion of loan guarantees for resettling Russian immigrants in Israel—that prodded right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to attend peace talks in Madrid. A trade embargo—even if imposed only by European states—would be a start. It is outside pressure that can alone halt the inexorable slide into a conflict that could become regional. And a new regional conflict with Israel could spell the end of the Zionist experiment in the Middle East. It may be quixotic, perhaps even impossible, but it is the last measure left to save Israel from itself. Chris Hedges is a veteran journalist and former Mideast bureau chief for The New York Times. His most recent book is “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America.” Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >
By Morgan Law, August 29, 2007 at 6:34 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
ATTENTION !!!
Report thisGET YOUR URGENT LOANS NOW FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE PROBLEMSM.
APPLY TODAY AND GET IT NOW,NO DELY NO STORIES, WE TAKE GOLD, DIAMOND, VEHICLES, AS COLLATERAL SECURITY.CONTACT THE OPREATION MANAGER NOW FOR YUOR LOAN. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) +2347034719330
By cann4ing, June 21, 2007 at 2:24 am #
Fadel, our resident Zionist nutcases, Ephraim “Lefty” Pesach and lilmamzer have moved into a new post, “Hamas holds the high cards.” You might want to check it out and, oh I don’t know, confront some of their propaganda with truth. But then, I am beginning to think that Zionists think it unduly rude for anyone, especially a Palestinian like yourself, to confront their little minds with truth.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, June 21, 2007 at 12:49 am #
Eliyahu, a former Israeli chief rabbi, advocates carpet bombing Gaza, and says there is no moral prohibition against killing civilians to save Jews. To read the full story, go the Jerusalem Post @ http://www.jpost.com
Then, compare this to how a fanatic atheist Zionist in our own backyards sees the solution by advocating and instigating that Israel should nuke the whole Arab-Muslim world; just check some of these Fascist Zionist visions of “Lefty” on this by going to the comments of few days back on this thread.
Puting these two posiitions in comparative perspective, one can find that fanatic religious Jews are one degree milder than fanatic atheist Fascist Zionists, but obviously both are the product of a savage mentality and evil teachings!
In light of this, the question begging an answer is: How many good Jews are there to neutralize the danger to world peace posed by these two fanatic extreme groups? I personally don’t know, and thus would like any comforting statistics by any informed reader.
Report thisBy Robert, June 17, 2007 at 3:34 pm #
THE 1948 ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINE ILAN PAPPÉ
“This article, excerpted and adapted from the early chapters of a new book, emphasizes the systematic preparations that laid the ground for the expulsion of more than 750,000 Palestinians from what became Israel in 1948. While sketching the context and diplomatic and political developments of the period, the article highlights in particular a multi-year Village Files project (194047) involving the systematic compilation of maps and intelligence for each Arab village and the elaborationunder the direction of an inner caucus of fewer than a dozen men led by David Ben-Gurionof a series of military plans culminating in Plan Dalet, according to which the 1948 war was fought. The article ends with a statement of one of the authors underlying goals in writing the book: to make the case for a paradigm of ethnic cleansing to replace the paradigm of war as the basis for the scholarly research of, and the public debate about, 1948.
ON A COLD WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON, 10 March 1948, a group of eleven men, veteran Zionist leaders together with young military Jewish officers, put the final touches on a plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine1. That same evening, military orders were dispatched to units on the ground to prepare for the systematic expulsion of Palestinians from vast areas of the country2. The orders came with a detailed description of the methods to be used to forcibly evict the people: large-scale intimidation; laying siege to and bombarding villages and population centers; setting fire to homes, properties, and goods; expelling residents; demolishing homes; and, finally, planting mines in the rubble to prevent the expelled inhabitants from returning. Each unit was issued its own list of villages and neighborhoods to target in keeping with the master plan. Code-named Plan D (Dalet in Hebrew), this was the fourth and final version of vaguer plans outlining the fate that was in store for the native population of Palestine3. The previous three plans had articulated only obscurely how the Zionist leadership intended to deal with the presence of so many Palestinians on the land the Jewish national movement wanted for itself. This fourth and last blueprint spelled it out clearly and unambiguously: the Palestinians had to go.
The plan, which covered both the rural and urban areas of Palestine, was the inevitable result both of Zionisms ideological drive for an exclusively Jewish presence in Palestine and a response to developments on the ground following the British decision in February 1947 to end its Mandate over the country and turn the problem over to the United Nations. Clashes with local Palestinian militias, especially after the UN partition resolution of November 1947, provided the perfect context and pretext for implementing the ideological vision of an ethnically cleansed Palestine.
Once the plan was finalized, it took six months to complete the mission. When it was over, more than half of Palestines native population, over 750,000 people, had been uprooted, 531 villages had been destroyed, and 11 urban neighborhoods had been emptied of their inhabitants. The plan decided upon on 10 March 1948, and above all its systematic implementation in the following months, was a clear case of what is now known as an ethnic cleansing operation.”
—————————————————————————
Here is the link to Ilan Pappe’s article “The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”:
http://71.18.226.238/final/en/journals/printer.php?aid=7175
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 17, 2007 at 3:11 am #
Fadel, Thank you for your kind words. While I am sure most of our resident Zionists would cite your being Palestinian as somehow discrediting what you have to say, we both know the reverse is true. Frankly, there have been far too few Palestinian voices heard over the American airwaves, especially these past six years.
The reference to Muhammed Declan was made by Ali Abunimah during a June 15, 2007 broadcast on Democracy Now. According to Mr. Abunimah, Mr. Declan and other Fatah commanders have been receiving weapons from Egypt, with the transfer facilitated by Israel. Recently, Israel has turned down several resupply requests because some of the Fatah commanders are so corrupt, they had been selling the weapons to the highest bidders. During the broadcast, both Mr. Abunimah and Laila El-Haddad referred to these Fatah units as “death squads,” and Mr. Abunimah compares them to the Contras who had mercilessly attacked soft civilian targets during the Reagan administration’s not so covert effort to effectuate regime change in Nicaragua in the 1980s—Elliot Abrams.
Fadel, if there is any insight you could add to our understanding of the current clash between Fatah and Hamas, I am sure most Truthdiggers would appreciate it.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, June 16, 2007 at 8:50 pm #
To Tony Wicher:
Yes, ITW sounds like a humane and progressive individual who just cant quite get his head out of the Zionist box. Perhaps we can yet manage to straighten him out.
========
I have been reading with great interest, admiration and love all the sound and reasonable arguments you posted lately, especially in response to ITW. I concur with your words above, but instead of perhaps we can yet manage to straighten him out, I would say, I hope you manage to help him find his real soul which is buried under a thick layer of fog due to insecurity and confusion. I, as a real Palestinian, would like to assure him that, if after real and sincere efforts at ending the conflict are under way, he will find me fighting on the side of the Jews against this Palestinian minority that might still be advocating the wishful thinking of throwing the Jews in the sea. The Jews, but not the Zealot Zionists, are there to stay. I will be honored and pleased to share with my good cousins this beautiful and Holy Land of God; neither the Jews nor the Arab-Muslims are this lands owners; all are just transient inhabitants of the land.
To Ernest Canning:
Thank you for all the wonderful effort you put in educating the participants on this thread. In one of your latest comments you alluded to this character called Muhammad Dahlan. This evil character is a disgrace for all Palestinians and Muslims, since he is dishonoring the name of Muhammad given to him mistakenly at birth. Dahlan is the henchman of both Israel and U.S. neocon governments. He has sold his soul and people to the highest bidder, and who can be a higher bidder than Israel and the Bush administration?! Believe me! When I first saw the face of this man surface in the political life of Palestine, some gut feeling made me very uncomfortable about this evil traitor. This is exactly the same feeling I had when I first saw Bushs face and heard his speech as the Republican front runner for the presidency in 2000. Though psychology is not my field of education and specialty, I think that I am a natural psychologist who is capable of recognizing evil when he first sees the face of one, even at a distance.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 16, 2007 at 6:55 pm #
Re #78598 by Ernest Canning on 6/16 at 2:32 pm
Ernest,
Yes, ITW sounds like a humane and progressive individual who just can’t quite get his head out of the Zionist box. Perhaps we can yet manage to straighten him out.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 6:32 pm #
Tony, excellent post. It is not possible to “equate” your principled opposition to Zionist, ethnic cleansing to “driving the Jews out of Israel.” ITW and the other Zionist posters are thus forced to “conflate” these two very different positions.
The difference I see between ITW and some of the other mindless Zionist posters, however, is that I sense he is conflicted between his intellectual ability to consider the evidence that all is not well on the Zionist front and the emotional pull of Zionism’s blinding ideology. His responses to my posts, and most recently to yours, suggest that so far, his emotionalism has prevailed over his ability to reason. This explains his effort to avoid the powerful facts contained in Robert’s video through the less-than-intellectually-honest dismissal of the documentary as “propaganda” followed by flight from this site altogether when your comments struck at the very core of his emotionally charged, Zionist beliefs.
I don’t know whether he will ever read the comments you and I posted since his parting remarks, but if he does, I hope he will come to understand that you and I had made a sincere effort to reach out to his better self.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 16, 2007 at 5:37 pm #
#78505 by Inherit The Wind on 6/16 at 4:17 am
(Unregistered commenter)
“TW,
Im disappointed in you.”
==================================================
Well, ITW, I hope you have a meditative vacation. Perhaps you will reach an epiphany and change your mind. I myself have not much to do on this quiet Saturday afternoon, so I am going to spend a little time to address some of your charges. You may never read my replies, but maybe somebody else will.
—————————————————————————
“I guess were back to you and your buddies knowing that everything Jews do, especially Israelis, is automatically evil, and nothing the wonderful, peaceful Arabs do ever is, and is always justified.”
—————————————————————————-
ITW, Will you please tell me where I or anyone else on this thread, even the most pro-Palestinian, has said this? Apparently you are willing to say anything, no matter how wildly ridiculous. You should be ashamed. Can’t you try to exercise a little restraint, a little scholarly integrity? How can we possibly have a constructive discussion this way?
I believe the point that I and “my buddies” on this thread all agree on is that the Zionist project, the idea of a “Jewish state” is inconsistent with univeral principles of democracy and human rights. It is not morally sustainable. It has led those who have adopted this ideology to commit crimes against humanity. Those crimes are ongoing, and they will not stop so long as the principle of having a “Jewish state” in Palestine remains the fundamental policy of the Israeli government.
—————————————————————————
“Like the 19 assholes who took over 4 airlines on 9/11 and killed nearly 3,000 people. I guess they were justified, too, and its just another piece of Israeli propaganda. Like the crap put up on Al Jazeera that it was really the Jews who were behind it and all of them were notified to get out of the WTC that day? (death lists prove that wrong).”
——————————————————————————-
ITW,
Nobody here has brought 9-11 up that I know of. I certainly haven’t. I have never been a 9-ll conspiracy theorist. I have always thought bin Laden is a real Arab/Muslim militant, and a brilliant, ruthless strategist, perhaps the equal of Ben Gurion. Both regard mass murder as an acceptable means of acheiving their glorious goals. Bin Laden has apparently run circles around the moronic Bush administration; as of this writing he is free as a bird and winning on all fronts. But I think this is only possible because he has help. As there is a synergy between Nazism and Zionism, so there is also a synergy between Muslim extremism and Western Imperialism. The imperialists in the Bush administration have never been interested in catching bin Laden. He is far, far more useful as a bogeyman to justify an endless “Global War on Terror”.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 16, 2007 at 5:37 pm #
Re #78505 by Inherit The Wind on 6/16 at 4:17 am
Continued from above)
“I cannot believe that people with brains can watch the Palestinians slaughtering each other and STILL blame all their atrocities and problems on ... those evil Jews, oops Zionists (chortle).”
—————————————————————————
ITW,
“Jew” is one thing; “Zionist” is another. I know this is hard for you, but please try to understand. A Zionist is a Jew who believes in a Jewish state. A hundred and twenty years ago there were no such Jews. I am hoping that in another twenty years the great majority of Jews will have given up on this terrible idea. When Zionism is gone from the Earth, there will still be millions of Jews, and I wish them all happiness and long life, wherever they live.
—————————————————————————
“I dont object to legitimate criticism of Israel, and there sure is plenty they deserve, but the clear-cut anti-semitism the answer to all our problems is to drive all the Jews out of Israel is garbage. Its not fair to Israelis, and its not fair to Palestinians either because it replaces reality and real solutions with ideal fantasies.”
—————————————————————————-
ITW,
I do not believe that one single poster on this thread has advocated “driving all the Jews out of Israel”. What has been advocated is an end to Zionist policies and a righting of the wrongs that have been committed because of these policies. In my view the only way this can be done is by a process of reunification that will correct a partition that should never have ocurred, where all people residing in the country will be equal and where those who have suffered because of the immoral Zionist policies are as far as possible made whole. This is not at all the same thing as “driving the Jews out of Israel”. I don’t know why you insist on equating them.
Report thisBy Peter RV, June 16, 2007 at 2:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ref.#78505 by Inherit the Wind.
Report thisYou might be disappointed with TW but you didn’t disappoint me.
Being a fanatical supporter of Israel, you can never be convinced that Israel’s faults are anything but some angelic ‘collateral damage’ on its way to survival. There is no evidence to the contrary you will accept, it doesn’t matter how glaring it is.
Your final arguments are ‘It is always Jewish fault’, ‘Israel is always to blame’ and other ready-made cheep artefacts of self-delusion, one uses when cornered in discussions.
Nobody’s ever said that Israel hasn’t done any good.
It has done extraordinarely good things-but, and here is the real nub of the problem- for the Israelis only! and, at the expense (apart from American taxpayers) of enormous sufferings of the Palestinians.
You are pointing triumphantly to the inter fighting between Palestinians (and Arabs in general) as a proof that Israel is innocent of any guilt towards Palestinians. This ,of course, is the most comfortable morally smug thought which absolves your conscience, but lots of us are’t made of the same stuff, and you’ll have to learn a lot more before we can take your blind allegiance to Israel, as anything but a rant of a fanatic jewish fundamentalist.
The facts have been there, ITW, for everybody to see for more than half a century now. Read Chris Hedges report again. It is not a question of some incidents which you cherry-pick for your convenience.
Since 1948, Israel has been dedicated to the destruction of a whole People - the Palestinian People. It has cleansed them ethnically, it has dispossesed them of their property,it has systematically humiliate them and committed the most heinous crimes against them. Nobody, outside your rabbinical (carpet bombing) circle can deny this,although some may justify it, lamely, as the necessity for survival (the’Never Again’ syndrom).
To have an evil policy implies necessarily an evil strategy and actions.
Strange, that you are ignorant of another fact, that every hostile occupation has always produced an armeed confrontation between the collaborators of the regime of occupation and the resistance to it.
Nazies ravaged the countries they occupied by arming their stooges (what we, ourselves, did in Vietnam) to go after their enemies.
Much more recently, Israel armed and supported the so called Christians in Lebanon (they are still trying to repeat it) against the Lebanese resistance to their occupation. Nowadays we hear that Shiite and Sunnis are constantly on each other throats, without ever asking who is behind those famous death squads that are fomenting the strife.
So, what do you think is different in Palestine? Al Fatah, or what is left of it, has openly received arms and the extreme support from the CIA and and Mossad. Would it be so strange to your intellect to imagine that those hooded death squads could be, in the best tradition of all occupations, the Mossad- CIA agents?
About forty years ago Israel tried to sink the USS Liberty with all its crew, to put the blame on Egypt, to provoke the U.S. nuclear attack on that country. This is only one of the exemples of how vile its machinations can be.
You are in a way like those settlers colonizers
enjoying their swimming pools on the top of the hill and denying that any other reality exists.
‘Pourvue que ca dure’ what the French would say.
By cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 2:37 pm #
Robert, Fisk’s article exposes the sham in the corporatocracy’s claims that all it seeks is to “spread democracy.” Whether we are talking about Palestine or Venezuela, the process is always the same. Regimes, no matter how undemocratic, will be labeled as “democratic” so long as they are willing to be pliant cogs in the neoliberal “new world order.” As Fisk has noted elsewhere, America favors democracy only when it advances its interests. When a people select a leader, like a Massadegh in Iran (1953) or Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, who seek to advance the interest of their own people rather than the corporate bottom line, these leaders are demonized as empire’s covert dimension springs into action, seeking ways to destabilize and overthrow the democratically elected regimes. It is for this reason that it matters not if Hamas makes genuine overtures for lasting peace with Israel. It will never be accepted as “legitimate” by the corporatocracy.
Report thisBy Robert, June 16, 2007 at 2:03 pm #
The Wages of Corruption and Occupation
Welcome to “Palestine”
By Robert Fisk
June 16/17, 2007
“Who can we negotiate with? To whom do we talk? Well of course, we should have talked to Hamas months ago. But we didn’t like the democratically elected government of the Palestinian people. They were supposed to have voted for Fatah and its corrupt leadership. But they voted for Hamas, which declines to recognize Israel or abide by the totally discredited Oslo agreement.
No one asked - on our side - which particular Israel Hamas was supposed to recognize. The Israel of 1948? The Israel of the post-1967 borders? The Israel which builds - and goes on to build - vast settlements for Jews and Jews only on Arab land, gobbling up even more of the 22 per cent of “Palestine” still left to negotiate over?”
Here is the link to Robert Fisk’s article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk06162007.html
Report thisBy Robert, June 16, 2007 at 1:50 pm #
Crocodile Tears
The Gaza Cage
By Uri Avnery
June 16/17, 2007
“WHAT HAPPENS when one and a half million human beings are imprisoned in a tiny, arid-territory, cut off from their compatriots and from any contact with the outside world, starved by economic blockade and unable to feed their families?”
Here is the link to Uri Avnery’s article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery06162007.html
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 12:26 pm #
ITW, conflating disagreement with your take on the conflict into an anti-Semitic desire to “drive all the Jews out of Israel” is an act of intellectual dishonesty. Not one of the critics of Zionism on this post has suggested that Jews should be driven out of Israel. When I first entered the dialogue between you and Tony Wicher, suggesting that UN Resolution 242 and a two-state solution had a better prospect of success than his proposed one-state solution, Tony responded: “Whatever brings peace.”
Not that it makes any difference, by I am personally the product of mixed parentage. My father was British. My mother was a Russian Jew. My Jewish friends tell me that if my mother is Jewish, that makes me Jewish, to which I usually respond, “What does that make my father? Chopped liver?”
My father was tortured by the Japanese in 1942. My parents met in a Japanese internment camp in Shanghai during World War II. I, myself, am a Vietnam vet. My personal and familial experience with war has led to a committment to peaceful resolutions of conflicts.
I regard myself not as Jewish, Christian or of any other religious affiliation but instead consider myself a secular humanist. I have no interest in religion beyond a personal committment to the First Amendment guarantee that each individual has a right to believe or not to believe as he or she sees fit.
I see you as an individual caught between a principled recognition that much of what has been done in the name of the state of Israel by its “leaders” (just as much of what has been done in the name of the US by its so-called “leaders”) is morally reprehensible and the sway of years of Zionist propaganda that prevent a more fundamental recognition that it is the very continuance of the “occupation” that lies at the core of endless conflict.
I sincerely hope that you (1) have a nice vacation and (2) return with a willingness to enter an honest, self-critical dialogue from which all of us can learn from one-another.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 16, 2007 at 8:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
TW,
I’m disappointed in you.
I guess we’re back to you and your buddies “knowing” that everything Jews do, especially Israelis, is automatically evil, and nothing the wonderful, peaceful Arabs do ever is, and is always justified.
Like the 19 assholes who took over 4 airlines on 9/11 and killed nearly 3,000 people. I guess they were justified, too, and it’s just another piece of Israeli propaganda. Like the crap put up on Al Jazeera that it was really the Jews who were behind it and all of them were notified to get out of the WTC that day? (death lists prove that wrong).
I cannot believe that people with brains can watch the Palestinians slaughtering each other and STILL blame all their atrocities and problems on ... those evil Jews, oops “Zionists” (chortle).
I don’t object to legitimate criticism of Israel, and there sure is plenty they deserve, but the clear-cut anti-semitism “the answer to all our problems is to drive all the Jews out of Israel” is garbage. It’s not fair to Israelis, and it’s not fair to Palestinians either because it replaces reality and real solutions with ideal fantasies.
Diplomacy is the art of the possible.
I’m going on vacation this afternoon, and am taking the opportunity to abandon this thread to the virulent bigots, sorry “Zionist”-haters (LOL).
It seems Mr. Scheer is a big believer that all the answers to the Middle East’s problems are due to Israel and her ceasing to exist will magically solve them.
Like the kids say: “As if!” They’ll go right on killing each other until they create secular societies and secular and democratic governments.
In case you hadn’t noticed, thats a HUMAN failing,not simply an Arab one.
Report thisBy Robert, June 16, 2007 at 4:31 am #
Ernest Canning…you are more than welcomed. I don’t know you in person, but your comments tell a lot about you as a person and what you stand for. You are one of those Americans who does NOT just sit on the sidelines and does NOTHING.
I too watch Amy Goodman on “Democracynow”. I think she has integrity & she is a very competent professional & has all the ingredients for humanity.
Ernest…I don’t know if you watched the debate between former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben Ami and Norman Finkelstein.
In Case that you haven’t, here is the link to this very informative & important debates on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
“Fmr. Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben Ami Debates Outspoken Professor Norman Finkelstein on Israel, the Palestinians, and the Peace Process (02/14/2006).”
Here is the link:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/14/1518230
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 3:23 am #
Tony and Robert: I thank you again for your always insightful comments.
Getting back to how corporate media can distort what we see and hear, we have the immediate coverage of the clash between Hamas and Fatah. Today, on Democracy Now, Ali Abunimah, founder of electronic intifada, presented a view that you have not and will not read in the corporate press.
“Since January 2006 when Hamas won the legislative election…, the United States refused the election results and has been arming several Palestinian militias, particularly those controlled by Gaza warlord, Mohammed Declan.” Abunimah compared Declan’s death squads to the Contras and noted that “the architect of this policy is none other than Elliott Abrams…who was convicted for lying to Congress in the Iran-Contra scandal.”
Abunimah contends this is part of a larger U.S. strategy of installing puppet regimes throughout the region to “fight proxy wars…against this phantom enemy of an Islamic caliphate that George Bush and his friends have dreamed up. And everywhere it’s failing. In Afghanistan the Taliban are resurgent. [In] Iraq…the US can’t even trust the Iraqi militias and the Iraqi army that it set up….And now we see the US-backed Palestinian Contras being routed in Gaza.”
Abunimah, who like Tony advocates a one-state solution, suggests that the Israeli policy of trying to isolate Palestinians in separate ghettos is failing; that “Palestinians are the majority population in Israeli-ruled territory between Jordan and the Mediterranian Sea. And it’s only a matter of time before the world wakes up to this reality.”
Report thisBy Robert, June 16, 2007 at 2:34 am #
“When Killings Don’t Count”
“A Week of Israeli Restraint”
By Tanya Reinhart
6/22/2006
“In Israeli discourse, Israel is always the side exercising restraint in its conflict with the Palestinians….”
“During the week of Israeli restraint, the army killed a Palestinian family who went on a picnic on the Beit Lahya beach in the Gaza Strip; after that, the army killed nine people in order to liquidate a Katyusha rocket.
But in the discourse of restraint, the first killing does not count, because the army denied its involvement, and the second was deemed a necessary act of self-defense.”
Here is the link to Tanya Reinhart’s article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/reinhart06222006.html
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 16, 2007 at 2:32 am #
Re #78457 by Ernest Canning on 6/15 at 8:54 pm
(332 comments total)
“I would not have had a problem if ITW had merely advanced the conventional view as to the immediate cause of the six day war. My problem is that he used this difference as an excuse to dismiss the entirety of a documentary as propaganda.”
I agree with you on that point. That’s why I also thought ITW’s response was uncalled for.
ITW may believe that Israel would withdraw from the occupied territories if its “right to exist” were recognized. I doubt this, since there is ample evidence that Zionists have always planned on conquering all of Palestine and have never been serious about a Palestinian state.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 1:59 am #
Billy, most of the targets in the six day war were military.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 16, 2007 at 12:54 am #
TW. You are partially correct in asserting that the American corporate media portrayed the six-day war as a pre-emptive strike launched because Arab forces, especially Egypt’s were massing at the border. Actually, some of the initial reporting erroneously suggested that that Syria and Egypt had struck first. (But then, I was in the U.S. military at the time, and the reporting we received was subject to a greater level of censorship).
This video touched upon that issue. It involves the fact that planning for this pre-emptive strike had been going on for quite some time within the Israeli military, and, as the video notes, the principle reservations pertained to how the Johnson administration would react. If you accept the notion that Pearl Harbor was a defensive strike, then perhaps you can accept the six day war as a defensive strike. I, for one, don’t buy it.
Surprise as well air superiority had a great deal to do with the lopsided level of Israeli success in the six-day war, just as it explained the lopsided results at Pearl Harbor. In 1973 the suprise was on the part of the Arab states which launched the Yom Kippur war suddenly and without provocation. It produced results that were very different from those that occurred in 1967.
I would not have had a problem if ITW had merely advanced the conventional view as to the immediate cause of the six day war. My problem is that he used this difference as an “excuse” to dismiss the entirety of a documentary as “propaganda. Actually, Robert’s video contains one of the most powerful “factual” statements as to the moral depravity that is the occupation.
In short, ITW used this classic historical dispute as a means by which he could simply change the subject—a tactic that is, quite frankly, intellectually dishonest.
Finally, many of our resident Zionist posters keep repeating the mantra that “land-for-peace” won’t work because all Arabs must be regarded as “murderous thugs” bent on the destruction of the state of Israel. Odd, I seem to recall that in the one instance in which Israel gave back conquered lands (Sinai), it led to a treaty and normal diplomatic relations with Egypt which has held to this day. Are we to believe that there is some fundamental difference between Egyptians and Palestinians that would facilitate peace and security in the first instance, yet result in a supposed Israeli suicide in the other? Or is the continued violence simply a reflection of an oppressed people striking out against their continued subjugation?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 16, 2007 at 12:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
” Yes, I had watched it before, but ITWs response threw me off and I had to watch it again. The video begins with the occupation. It does not go into the war or the events preceding it. So I thought ITWs response was off target. As a description of the occupation itself, it looks perfectly reasonable to me. It is true that there is an Arab version of events which tells a different story, and I have never been inclined to believe it. It does sound like propaganda to me as ITW says.
Since neither you nor the video were asserting the Arab version of events, I dont see what ITW is objecting to. Perhaps it is that we dont see the context; that the occupation was the result of Arab aggression.
You say that the official version of the 67 war is propaanda. What then is your version? “
Bravo, TW! I don’t want or expect you to agree with me—I just want you to think—and QUESTION!
I don’t believe the Israeli rule has been a Garden of Eden either. I think terrible mistakes and even atrocities were committed—what Ariel Sharon did in Lebanon in the early 80’s should have brought him before The Hague. The Utra-right wingers in Israel have driven moderate and fanatical Palestinians to hate Israel. Likewise, the terrorist actions of Al Fatah and Hamas have driven liberal and moderate Israelis together with the extreme right-wing wackos.
It has happened to both sides out of fear, pure, naked terror for themselves and their families. As George W. Bush here has manipulated our fear and terror, so have the leaders there. You know that at one point people in Wyoming were terrified they were going to be attacked? And that Bush was spending 5x per person MORE there than in New York, which WAS attacked?
The one thing, TW, you’ve been batting around but never connected on is that word: Fear. Both sides are so afraid of the other’s brutality that they cannot find a way out of it.
Of course, President Mental Midget the Chimpster stalled far too long and did far too little to solve anything.
Perhaps what we all suffer from at this time, Americans, Israelis and Palestinians, is TOTALLY INCOMPETENT leadership.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 15, 2007 at 11:42 pm #
Re #78260 by Ernest Canning on 6/15 at 7:04 am
(329 comments total)
TW—You mistake vigorous disagreement with anger. Have you watched Roberts video? If so, do you agree with ITW that it is propaganda?
———————————————————————-
Ernest,
Yes, I had watched it before, but ITW’s response threw me off and I had to watch it again. The video begins with the occupation. It does not go into the war or the events preceding it. So I thought ITW’s response was off target. As a description of the occupation itself, it looks perfectly reasonable to me. It is true that there is an Arab version of events which tells a different story, and I have never been inclined to believe it. It does sound like propaganda to me as ITW says.
Since neither you nor the video were asserting the Arab version of events, I don’t see what ITW is objecting to. Perhaps it is that we don’t see the context; that the occupation was the result of Arab aggression.
You say that the official version of the 67 war is propaanda. What then is your version?
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 15, 2007 at 11:04 am #
TW—You mistake vigorous disagreement with anger. Have you watched Robert’s video? If so, do you agree with ITW that it is propaganda?
Report thisBy nahida, June 15, 2007 at 10:02 am #
Gaza’s Reality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhOa5hv3zas&eurl;=
Story of student from Gaza
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vu7WjxPAyY&mode=related&search;=
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 15, 2007 at 8:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
TW:
You seem reasonable enough: You remember the 1967 war the way I do.
But this absurd argument (not made by you) that the war didn’t come about with Nasser’s move to obliterate Israel, that it’s another Tonkin Gulf, is ridiculous, and nothing but Arab propaganda and an attempt to re-writehistory for the most humiliating defeat since Britain sank the Spanish Armada. It’s more like Holocaust denial or claiming the moon landings were faked in Hollywood.
TW: “Who you gonna believe? Me or your own eyes?”
There’s also a logical path—follow the hypothesis through to all the implications (that there was no attack massing, that Nasser wasn’t threatening destruction, etc.) and it becomes totally illogical and insane—and in 1967 the Israelis under Golda Meir were anything but insane. It also means that Anwar Sadat had to be part of the conspiracy to hide “the truth” that lead to peace between Israel and Egypt.
Then follow the null hypothesis, that the history of the war is pretty much what we remember. Behaviors and events make sense. Like the FACT that Israel has given back fully 95% of the territory she captured in 1967.
There are those who could argue that the rain on your head was really liquid sunshine. You have enough brains to figure it out for yourself.
The incentive on the Arab side to re-writethe history of the 1967 war is HUGE. Because, if, as I assert, the essential facts are as I’ve said, then Israel had every RIGHT to seize enemy territory, to disarm it, and to create buffers, and to give it back on its own terms.
But if, somehow, the idea that Israel was threatened and threatened with destruction and the genocide of her people can be challenged (like the Holocaust) then Israel loses the moral high ground. Yet if that was so, she would have had NO incentive to cede Sinai and Gaza and much of the West Bank. Instead, whole-scale eviction of the Arabs would have occured but didn’t.
It’s been done before: Stalin literally moved 1/3 of Poland west, taking that eastern 3rd for Russia and replacing it with German territory. Gdansk, the Polish city were Solidarity began was Danzig, a German city, until 1945. Nobody said anything. Yet Israel did not take that action. And that fact alone contradicts the 67 War deniers and proves it to be a total lie.
Report thisBy Robert, June 15, 2007 at 7:45 am #
Ooops…Please disregard my comment #78229. That was supposed to go to another comment/response.
Report thisMy sincere apologies.
By Peter RV, June 15, 2007 at 7:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ref.#78229 by Robert
Report thisI know you are telling the truth about the sufferings of Palestinians. This is easy to sense from your writings.
I’ve just received an e-mail from my son which I thought is worth communicating.
“So the corrupt Fatah crumbles like a stale cookie. Despite its collaboration with Bush and Olmert, it was unable to deliver anything to its people and should therefore be swept aside. Abbas could retire to that quarter of DC favoured by pro-invasion Iraqis. May be one of them can help him land a job as research assistant at a neo-con think tank. They are birds of a feather.
For some reason the image of the “irrelevant” Arafat comes to mind. Here is the reality of Israeli policy towards the untermenschen of the occupied territories: eventually every Palestinian moderete becomes irrelevant.”
Well said son.
By Robert, June 15, 2007 at 6:36 am #
(continued from previous comment)
We stayed there for about 9 weeks. My family and I made a commitment to tell the truth about what we saw, witnessed and experienced from our trip to the Holy Land. So there you go…just wanted to share that with you. It may help to understand where my drive for the TRUTH on this topic comes from.
I am NOT anti-Jewish. I am anti-Zionism, Israel’s RACISM/APARTHEID policies that the Israeli government and its brutal IDF have gruesomely enforced on the Palestinians for decades.
It is fortunate that the are many JEWS who are for TRUTH, peace, moral justice and against the many horrible crimes committed by Zionists against the Palestinians from the 1940’s to this date.
I have high respect for Norman Finkelstein, Noam Chomsky, Sara Roy, Tanya Rheinhart, Amira Haas, Uri Avnary, Gideon Levi, Nurit-Peled Elhanan and many other Jews who are on the side of TRUTH, moral justice, peace, human rights, international law, UN Resolutions.
They are NOT on the side of the brutal / racist zionism of Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, Izthak Shamir, Ben Netanyahu, Ehud Olmert, Israeli military generals, Israel’s brutal IDF and the fanatic zionist zealots.
I would like to ask/request for you to read an article by Dr. Nurit-Peled Elhan, an Israeli professor. This compassionate Jewish mother writes about the children of the Israelis & the Palestinians…the victims of this tragic conflict.
————————————————————————
“We Are All Victims of the Occupation”
Let Our Children Live
By Nuri Peled-Elhanan 01/29/2007
Here is the link to this outstanding article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/peled01292007.html
Report thisBy Robert, June 15, 2007 at 3:09 am #
A Grave Injustice at DePaul University
Why I Plan to Boycott the Catholic Church
By Bill Christison
Former CIA Analyst, 6/13/2007
“If anyone reading this thinks I am overreacting, that is unfortunate. The Israel lobby simply should not be allowed to win this round. There is little doubt that some will argue that the Catholic hierarchy in Rome had nothing to do with the decision against Finkelstein. But there is also little doubt that the hierarchy can overrule that decision if it wishes. And it says something that, to me, is utterly despicable if the hierarchy of the church refuses to overrule its own underlings at DePaul.”
Here is the link for the rest of this article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison06132007.html
Report thisBy Robert, June 15, 2007 at 2:40 am #
June 12, 2007
Prof. Norman Finkelstein reflects on DePaul university’s decision to deny him tenure and the 40 year old Israeli occupation.
Here is the link for an 8:48 minutes audio (Chicago Public radio) of Prof. Finkelstein. He is truly a man of great courage & integrity. He is NOT going to budge a fraction of an inch from what he believes in…the TRUTH.
Report thishttp://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=1083
By Robert, June 15, 2007 at 2:12 am #
ON ITS 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE JUNE 1967 ARAB-ISRAELI WAR…
Norman Finkelstein on Chicago Public radio:
June 6, 2007
“Norman Finkelstein: In order to understand the build up to the war the best place to begin is November, 1966. There was an Israeli retaliatory, as they call it, attack on a Jordanian village called Samu. In the course of the attack on Samu they blew up 125 buildings and killed a large number of Jordanian soldiers.
When that attack happened the Jordanians and also the Syrians began to attack Nasser for not coming to their defense. Here was this Egyptian president claiming to be the leader of Arab nationalism and Pan-Arabism and impotence in the face of Israeli aggression.”
Here is the link for the transcript-or- audio of Norman Finkelstein’s interview on the 40th anniversary of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war:
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=1067
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 15, 2007 at 1:30 am #
#77937 by Inherit The Wind on 6/14 at 7:10 am
(Unregistered commenter)
“Ernest Canning on 6/13 at 9:30 pm
(322 comments total)
“Actually, I started by providing a fact: The film begins by OMITTING that in 1967, Israel was facing massing armies on her borders, that had the stated intention of obliterating her.”
OK, I did watch this film before. It starts with the occupation, not with the war. ITW’s description of the war could be true, and it would not make the film false. Arabs obviously have their own version of how the war began. I will have to consult scholarly sources I consider reliable.
As to the accuracy of the film, it agrees with everything I know about the occupation.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 15, 2007 at 12:36 am #
Re #77959 by Lefty on 6/14 at 8:15 am
(259 comments total)
Greetings Tony, I love you and appreciate your being a WARRIOR FOR PEACE AND JUSTIC [sic][emphasis added] for the Palestinians. . . .
===================================================
Fadel, in addition to all of the other pejorative things Ive said about you, in case I left it out, YOURE ALSO AN IDIOT! “
——————————————————————————-
Lefty,
You have got to be getting desperate when you are reduced to criticizing someone for a typo. You’re starting to like Fadel. Admit it.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 15, 2007 at 12:28 am #
Re #78170 by Ernest Canning on 6/14 at 7:47 pm
(323 comments total)
I remember the 67 war as reported in U.S. newspapers and it was reported there as ITW describes it. I took it at face value at the time. Could you and ITW have a learned discussion about this without getting angry, not as people on opposite sides, but as two friends together seeking the truth? I’d be interested. Please give sources. Meanwhile I will go and watch Robert’s video.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 14, 2007 at 11:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ernest Canning on 6/14 at 7:47 pm
(323 comments total)
ITW: I dont want to burst your bubble but the tale that Arab armies were gathering, getting ready to strike, so Israel struck pre-emptively is a piece of propaganda that ranks up there with Bushs claim that we had no choice but to invade Iraq before the smoking WMD gun became a mushroom cloud.
*******************************
Now we come to it: You are in true-blue tin-foil hat and Holocaust-denial mode.
I suppose those 80,000 Egyptian troops were just on the Israeli border with the local Welcome Wagon. And the 40,000 Syrians to the North were delivering singing telegrams.
You have burst my bubble. I thought there was a shred of hope that you actually a real, factual argument. Instead, you have the Arab version of Holocaust-denial.
Sorry, pal. I’m old enough to remember that war, to remember Nasser posturing before their collapse that he was going to drive the Jews into the sea as he was massing his forces. I remember him creating the United Arab Republic to try to create a unified force to destroy Israel, and then swoop on the long-dreamed-of Caliphate. And I remember it all exploding like a house of cards.
I also remember where to find the NYTimes records and microfilm.
What are you, Chico Marx? “Who you gonna believe: Me or your own eyes?” I believe my own eyes and my own memory.
Since you aren’t capable of serious discussion (unlike TW and , occasionally Robert and even Billy The Dik), we are done. You will rant and rave and call me names, hurl accusations, and claim I have no facts, yada, yada, yada, and I will ignore it. Better and smarter men than you have tried and failed.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 14, 2007 at 11:47 pm #
ITW: I don’t want to burst your bubble but the tale that Arab armies were gathering, getting ready to strike, so Israel struck pre-emptively is a piece of propaganda that ranks up there with Bush’s claim that we had no choice but to invade Iraq before the smoking WMD gun became a mushroom cloud.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, June 14, 2007 at 10:54 pm #
#78100 by Tony Wicher on 6/14 at 4:21 pm
(105 comments total)
“I see this as a pathological condition requiring compassion and therapy which attempts to remove the scales from their eyes. Condemning them as human beings serves no good purpose; it merely deepens their conviction that they are right and you are the enemy.”
=================
Tony: Thanks for your elaboration; I concur with your suggested ideal approach to dealing with the people in question.
As a man of peace and reason, my love and respect for you is increasing! Please keep up the good and noble work! And may your approach bear fruits, especially with this character who calls himself “Lefty.”
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 14, 2007 at 8:21 pm #
Fadel, in #77856, writes:
My point is that ideologies do not exist in a vaccum; they are created by men with souls and flesh; they are implemented by men with souls and flesh; and they are sustained by men with souls and flesh. Ideologies based on theory and thought do not kill others, dispossess them, steal their land and cause any harm by themelseves, but followers of these idelogies do. So by necessity, if you condemn Zionism, you must condemn Zionists.This is like saying that guns dont kill by themselves, its people with guns and intent who do killing. You cannot take the gun or the gun manufacturer to court, but you can take the owner of the gun who used it to kill.
——————————————————————-
Fadel,
I think everybody starts out believing whatever their parents told them when they were young and trusting children. These beliefs determine how most people see the world for the rest of their lives; they fit their experiences into these early belief systems, so that the belief systems themselves rarely change. Some people do transcend these beliefs, but most do not. Zionists, for example, were educated as children to believe that Zionism is noble, that the founders of Israel were heros, etc. Their parents tell them nothing about the Nakba or Palestinian suffering. When they grow up, they have a blind spot. Given the distorted way they see the world, their responses are understandable. They may be perfectly good people of conscience outside of this one area. I see this as a pathological condition requiring compassion and therapy which attempts to remove the scales from their eyes. Condemning them as human beings serves no good purpose; it merely deepens their conviction that they are right and you are the enemy.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 14, 2007 at 7:59 pm #
Re #77862 by Robert on 6/13 at 10:34 pm
Thanks, Robert. That’s a great post.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 14, 2007 at 11:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Ernest Canning on 6/13 at 9:30 pm
(322 comments total)
ITW—Your effort to dismiss this documentary as propaganda reminds me of the effort by Rumsfeld et al to dismiss as propaganda the live al Jazeera TV broadcasts during the seige of Falluja—as if the photographic images, instead of the Rumsfeldian Newspeak were the lie.
Facts, ITW! Youve provided nary a one! “
******************
Actually, I started by providing a fact: The film begins by OMITTING that in 1967, Israel was facing massing armies on her borders, that had the stated intention of obliterating her. Rather than let Egypt and Syria get the strategic advantage, Israel seized it and attacked the massing forces. Jordan remained at peace for a day, until King Hussein joined the attack on Israel. Had he not done so, the West Bank would have remained Jordanian.
Naturally your film omitted this CRITICAL tidbit.
Perhaps you ought to take a couple of hours out for some simple entertainment. I suggest the blockbuster hit “The DaVinci Code”. Pay PARTICULAR attention to the images Tom Hanks’s character presents at the beginning of the film, and how EVERY ONE OF THEM is not what it seems.
You will not succeed in “framing the discussion” with me. And the only thing I’d like to see Donald Rumsfeld do is appear in an orange jumpsuit. I have opposed the war in Iraq since before the attacks were launched, following President Carter’s sage advice not to fight that war. I TOTALLY oppose going to war with Iran, knowing full well that NUMEROUS diplomatic opportunities to make peace with them have been deliberately squandered by the Bush Administration.
How is that POSSIBLE if I’m such a “Zionist”? We all know that Zionist ALL wanted and still want the Iraq war and war with Iran, don’t they?
I know, I know. I’m cheating: I’m using logic and reason.
Contradictions cannot occur. When you find one, check your premises. At least one of them will be in error.
(somebody said that far better than me).
If you are going to continue in this absurd vein, I’m going to go on to more interesting and productive discussions.
TW: I don’t mean to be insulting, but yes, I do think you are naive. There is no way your one-state solution can work in this time. Maybe 40 or 50 years from now, maybe 100. But now? To not recognize that a blood-bath is inevitable is to ignore today’s headlines from Gaza City and the West Bank.
Yes, I would love to see a Mandella or Gandhi emerge that ALL Palestinians would say “THIS man can lead us back to peace and properity” and then follow. The Palestinians need to restore mechanisms amongst themselves for peaceful resolution of differences. They don’t have them now. Until they have them ingrained in their society again, a one-state solution means simply all the Jews get slaughtered.
Until then, Israel would be insane to open her doors to them.
On her side, Israel needs to marginalize their version of the neocons and religious fundamentalists. Excesses against civilians need to be curtailed and punished. Funny thing: Americans need to do the same damn thing.
Report thisBy Peter RV, June 14, 2007 at 10:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ref.#77862 by Robert
Report thisThanks for Mandela’s letter text.
Actually, I knew that “Mandela’s Statement” was taken out of the context, by our Hecklers. It is their standard tactics (just remember Ahmadinejad’s “wiping Israel off the map”).
The baseness of these people is truly to be admired.
On the other hand, what do you expect from those who routinely justify killing of Palestinian kids?
By Robert, June 14, 2007 at 2:34 am #
Comment #77628 by “lefty” on 6/13 at 9:39 am
“Lefty=ephraim pesach”...keeps throwing at us what Nelson Mandela said about Israel…Well…here is a response that might be of interest to ALL on board here & everywhere:
=====================================================
A LETTER FROM NELSON MANDELA TO THOMAS FRIEDMAN
MARCH 30, 2001
TO: THOMAS FRIEDMAN (columnist New York Times)
FROM: NELSON MANDELA (former President South Africa)
“Thomas, if you follow the polls in Israel for the last 30 or 40 years, you clearly find vulgar racism that includes a third of the population who openly declare themselves to be racist. This racism is of nature of “I hate Arabs” and “I wish Arabs would be dead”. If you also follow the judicial system in Israel you will see there is discrimination against Palestinians, and if you further consider the 1967 occupied territories you will find there are two judicial systems in operation that represent two different approaches to human life: one for Palestinian life and the other for Jewish life. Additionally there are two approaches to property and to land. Palestinian property is not recognized as private property because it can be confiscated.
As to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, there is an additional factor. The so-called “Palestinian autonomous areas” are bantustans. These are restricted entities within the power structure of the Israeli apartheid system.
The Palestinian state cannot be the by-product of the Jewish state, just in order to keep the Jewish purity of Israel. Israel’s racial discrimination is daily life of most Palestinians. Since Israel is a Jewish state, Israeli Jews are able to accrue special rights which non-Jews cannot do. Palestinian Arabs have no place in a “Jewish” state.
Apartheid is a crime against humanity. Israel has deprived millions of Palestinians of their liberty and property. It has perpetuated a system of gross racial discrimination and inequality. It has systematically incarcerated and tortured thousands of Palestinians, contrary to the rules of international law. It has, in particular, waged a war against a civilian population, in particular children.
The responses made by South Africa to human rights abuses emanating from the removal policies and apartheid policies respectively, shed light on what Israeli society must necessarily go through before one can speak of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and an end to its apartheid policies.
Thomas, I’m not abandoning Mideast diplomacy. But I’m not going to indulge you the way your supporters do. If you want peace for democracy, I will support you. If you want formal apartheid, we will not support you. If you want to support racial discrimination and ethnic cleansing, we will oppose you.
When you figure out what you’re about, give me a call.”
Now for the the rest of the STORY…here is the link:
http://www.mediamonitors.net/arjan28.html
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, June 14, 2007 at 1:51 am #
#77846 by Tony Wicher on 6/13 at 9:13 pm
(103 comments total)
I am not condemning Zionists but Zionism, the ideology, the project of a Jewish state in Palestine. I think it is and always was essentially pernicious. I am not attacking any person; you will notice that I do not engage in personal invective.
Report this====================
Greetings Tony, I love you and appreciate your being a warrior for peace and justic for the Palestinians. However, I beg to disagree with you on this point. My point is that ideologies do not exist in a vaccum; they are created by men with souls and flesh; they are implemented by men with souls and flesh; and they are sustained by men with souls and flesh. Ideologies based on theory and thought do not kill others, dispossess them, steal their land and cause any harm by themelseves, but followers of these idelogies do. So by necessity, if you condemn Zionism, you must condemn Zionists.This is like saying that guns don’t kill by themselves, it’s people with guns and intent who do killing. You cannot take the gun or the gun manufacturer to court, but you can take the owner of the gun who used it to kill.
By cann4ing, June 14, 2007 at 1:30 am #
ITW—Your effort to dismiss this documentary as propaganda reminds me of the effort by Rumsfeld et al to dismiss as propaganda the live al Jazeera TV broadcasts during the seige of Falluja—as if the photographic images, instead of the Rumsfeldian Newspeak were the lie.
Facts, ITW! You’ve provided nary a one!
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 14, 2007 at 1:26 am #
Tony Wicher, I wholeheartedly agree that Zionism is a pernicious, racist ideology that has led its adherents to commit crimes against humanity. My statement was limited to a very narrow issue—the 1941 effort by a tiny faction of the Zionist movement to strike an accord with Adolf Hitler. Setting aside questions of ideology, that effort was a despicable act that all—including the Zionists posting on the site, should condemn. My only point is that we should avoid anything that resembles “guilt by association” that might be misconstrued as an effort to lay this despicable act on the doorstep of all Zionists.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 14, 2007 at 1:13 am #
Re #77780 by Ernest Canning on 6/13 at 5:44 pm
(319 comments total)
“However, I think it no more appropriate to condemn all Zionists for Sterns despicable attempt at a Zionist/Nazi alliance then it would be to condemn all Catholics because the current Pope was once a member of the Hitler Youth.”
I am not condemning Zionists but Zionism, the ideology, the project of a Jewish state in Palestine. I think it is and always was essentially pernicious. I am not attacking any person; you will notice that I do not engage in personal invective.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 13, 2007 at 11:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Take, for example, my effort to reach out to ITW by suggesting that he actually watch the marvelously factual one hour, 9 minute documentary which Robert linked to in comment #76638 and to then return so that we could entertain an honest, intellectual discussion.”
******************
Your idea of an intellectual discussion is for me to watch an hour and 18 minute piece of pure propaganda from one of Robert’s favorite biased shills, that starts off lying in the very first note it displays, and THEN discuss this as if it’s hard fact???
That’s not reaching out, Earnest, that’s “Framing the discussion” just the way the Fox Noise Propaganda Net does. That’s how Sean Hannity “discusses” things. It’s playing with loaded dice and a marked deck and I’m not stupid enough to fall for such an elementary trick. I guess you must take me for a real chump.
“You can’t cheat an honest man, but never give a sucker an even break, and don’t wisen up a chump.”—W.C. Fields.
At least TW is never insulting, just wrong.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 13, 2007 at 9:44 pm #
Tony Wicher: The quote you provided of the effort by Avraham Stern of the “National Military Organization” to enter a pact with Hitler so as to further his twisted, Zionist goals is one of the more disturbing that I have ever read, especially when it was by then, 1941, obvious that the Nazi goals were genocidal.
However, I think it no more appropriate to condemn all Zionists for Stern’s despicable attempt at a Zionist/Nazi alliance then it would be to condemn all Catholics because the current Pope was once a member of the Hitler Youth.
The real criticism of present-day Zionists lies in the fact that they have become so blinded by their ideology that they resemble the mindless Party members in George Orwell’s “1984” who would daily participate in a ritual of hate. These people have no interest in any facts that do not fit their preconceived notions of what this conflict is all about.
Take, for example, my effort to reach out to ITW by suggesting that he actually watch the marvelously factual one hour, 9 minute documentary which Robert linked to in comment #76638 and to then return so that we could entertain an honest, intellectual discussion. I was not at all surprised that my olive branch triggered a spiteful response from our resident Zionist sociopath, Ephraim “Lefty” Pesach, who simply called me “scum.” But I actually thought there was a prospect that ITW and perhaps Charles Barton would rise to the challenge.
Boy was I wrong! Their subsequent posts reveal that they have no interest in acquiring the knowledge that the Robert-linked video offers. They have no interest in honest intellectual discussion—a point underscored by their repetition of Zionist propaganda about the supposed strength of Palestinian armaments.
I don’t want to sound as if I am belittling the Palestinian armed resistance, but the fact is that their puny collection of arms has about as much chance of succeeding against the IDF as a minnow would have if it sought to attack a great white shark.
While I would never down play civilian casualties on either side, our resident Zionist propagandists chose to ignore the vast disparity where far more Palestinian civilians have been killed by the IDF as compared to Israeli civilians killed by the Palestinian armed resistance, and most deaths, on either side, have occurred “within” the occupied territories. But, of course, since the Orwellian U.S. press does not cover the death of Palestinian children, yet plays to the hilt the death of even a single Israeli child, the picture is skewed.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 9:32 pm #
Since we are worrying about who is getting blamed, here is my idea of the order of blame. The original sin belongs to the Roman Catholic Church (later continued by Protestant churches) which for millenia taught that “the Jews killed Jesus”. This is the origen of anti-Semitism as I understand it. This led to widespread persecution and scapegoating of Jews. Anti-Semitism, then, is about 2000 years old. Modern Zionism as the project for a Jewish state arose in the 19th century as a reaction to anti-Semitism. The basic idea was that Jews are persecuted everywhere, so they must have a state of their own to be safe. The idea to found such a state in Palestine was born out of anti-Semitism. The right response to anti-Semitism is to oppose it by strengthening democracy. The movement to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, on the other hand, is the wrong response because it does not oppose anti-Semitism; in fact, it benefits from it. I do believe wise rabbis have understood this about Zionism from the beginning. Perhaps under difficult circumstances the Jewish people will listen to them again before it is too late.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 8:26 pm #
“#77349 by Inherit The Wind on 6/12 at 10:38 am
(Unregistered commenter)”
“And you want Israel to open its doors and lay down its defenses and trust THESE maniacs with their childrens lives? You go first and well see if YOU survive!
TW, you missed my point: The Palestinians would MURDER any Gandhi or Mandella who appeared, and do it summarily, then get back to their internecine gang war.”
Report this—————————————————————————-
You must think I’m really naive not to know this. I know very well that peacemakers everywhere are in danger of martyrdom, because they are not on anyone’s “side” and fanatics from every side hate them and consider them traitors. But you once again make the mistake of confusing the leadership with the people, both on the Israeli side and the Palestinian side, and you tar all Palestinians with the same brush.
By Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 8:08 pm #
Re #77628 by Lefty on 6/13 at 5:39 pm
(240 comments total)
Lets try this again:
I cannot conceive of Israel withdrawing if Arab states do not recognize Israel, within secure borders. Nelson Mandela
—————————————————————————
Lefty,
If a two-state solution is assumed, this statement of Manela is perfectly reasonable. Under the one democratic state solution that I propose, however, Israel does not have to withdraw from anywhere, Israel’s existence within secure borders from the river to the sea would be recognized by the world community. But only if it becomes a real democracy and includes the Palestinians. In which case, of course, it will no longer be “Israel” as we know it. It will be something much better. But first the Jewish people must repudiate Zionism.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 7:49 pm #
Re #77564 by Inherit The Wind on 6/13 at 11:52 am
Here is another clip from the Liebermann article on jewsagainstzionism which shows the synergy between Nazism and Zionism in concrete form.
“In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground “Fighters for the Freedom of Israel”, better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist “National Military Organization” (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the group’s attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.
This remarkable proposal “for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation on the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany” is worth quoting at some length:
“The NMO which is very familiar with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program takes the view that: 1.Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO. 2.Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry. 3.The establishment of the Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty, with the German Reich, would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.
“On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.
“This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures, outside as well. Along with this the “Jewish” men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.
The Seventh Million
“The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.
“The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England”.
(Original documentin German Auswertiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E224152 and E234155-58. Complete original text published in: David Yisraeli, The Palestinian Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1947) pp. 315-317).
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 7:38 pm #
#77564 by Inherit The Wind on 6/13 at 11:52 am
“I stand by my original statement. Neither Jews in general nor Zionists in particular are responsible for the Holocaust. It is morally reprehensible to blame the victims and inferentially excuse the Nazis, which of course, is what you are both doing.”
—————————————————————————-
IHW
I am not excusing or justifying Nazis, and I don’t believe Teitelbaum is either. I am saying that both Nazis and Zionists are racists, and that both are to blame. Zionist racism is the compliment of anti-Semitism, of Nazi racism. Zionism and Nazism together have a synergy which produces effects greater than either by itself. Zionism exacerbates anti-Semitism all over the world, and this does force Jews who lived peacefully in their own countries for generations to migrate to Israel, which is what Zionists want.
Here is another clip from the Jews against Zionism site. These statements ring true to me.
THE ROLE OF ZIONISM IN THE HOLOCAUST
Article by Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann - Australia
From its’ inception, many rabbis warned of the potential dangers of Zionism and openly declared that all Jews loyal to G-d should stay away from it like one would from fire. They made their opinions clear to their congregants and to the general public. Their message was that Zionism is a chauvinistic racist phenomenon which has absolutely naught to do with Judaism. They publicly expressed that Zionism would definitely be detrimental to the well being of Jews and Gentiles and that its effects on the Jewish religion would be nothing other than destructive. Further, it would taint the reputation of Jewry as a whole and would cause utter confusion in the Jewish and non-Jewish communities. Judaism is a religion. Judaism is not a race or a nationality. That was and still remains the consensus amongst the rabbis…
Report thisAll of the leading Jewish religious authorities of that era predicted great hardship to befall humanity generally and the Jewish People particularly, as a result of Zionism. To be a Jew means that either one is born to a Jewish mother or converts to the religion with the condition that he or she make no reservations with regard to Jewish Law. Unfortunately there are many Jews who have no inkling whatsoever as to the duties of a Jew. Many of them are not to blame, for in many cases they lacked a Jewish education and upbringing. But there are those who deliberately distort the teachings of our tradition to suit their personal needs. It is self understood that not just anyone has the right or the ability to make a decision regarding the philosophy or law of a religion. Especially matters in which that person has no qualification. It follows then that those individuals who “decided” that Judaism is a nationality are to be ignored and even criticized. It is no secret that the founders of Zionism had never studied Jewish Law nor did they express interest in our holy tradition. They openly defied Rabbinical authority and self-appointed themselves as leaders of the Jewish “nation”. In Jewish history, actions like those have always spelled disaster. To be a Jew and show open defiance of authority or to introduce “amendment” or “innovation” without first consulting with those officially appointed as Jewish spiritual leaders is the ideal equation to equal catastrophe. One can not just decide to “modernize” ancient traditions or regulations. The spiritual leaders of contemporary Judaism better known as Orthodox rabbis have received ordination to judge and interpret matters pertaining to the Jewish faith. These rabbis have received their rights and responsibilities and form a link in the unbroken chain of the Jewish tradition dating all the way back to Moses who received the Torah from Almighty G-d Himself. It was these very rabbis who, at the time of the formation of the Zionist movement, foresaw the pernicious outcome that was without a doubt lined up…
By nahida, June 13, 2007 at 5:18 pm #
To all those who know nothing about my faith, would they kindly refrain from lecturing me about it!
It seems to me that the zionists in their wishful fantasies want to believe that we -the Muslim women- suffer from degradation.
The only degradation I see is that when the criminals, oppressors, occupiers (men and women) fail to see the degradation they are doing to themselves, to their souls and to their humanity, by their sadistic barbaric and cruel actions.
When their sick minds see nothing wrong with nuking and annihilating others just because they are not chosen
When they shamelessly advocate for another holocaust, thinking that its quite acceptable and even desirable as long as its done against the none-chosen ones.
THIS IS THE REAL DEGRADATION
Only for those interested, this is what the Quran says about women:
O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other. Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of God is (one who is) the most righteous of you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things) (Quran 49:13)
O mankind! Reverence your Guardian-Lord, Who created you from a single soul, created, of like nature, its mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women-reverence God, through Whom you demand your mutual (rights), and (reverence) the wombs (that bore you): for God ever watches over you (Quran 4:1)
It is He Who created you from a single soul and made its mate of like nature, in order that he might dwell with her in love” (Quran 7:189)
Never will I suffer to be lost the work of any of you, be he/she male or female: you are members one of another… If any do deeds of righteousness, be they male or female, and have faith, they will enter paradise and not the least injustice will be done to them (Quran 4:124)
Whoever works righteousness, man or woman, and has Faith, verily, to him will We give a new Life, a life that is good and pure and We will bestow on such their reward according to the best of their actions. (16-97)
The Believers, men and women, are protectors one of another: they enjoin what is just, and forbid what is evil: they observe regular prayers, practise regular charity, and obey God and His Messenger. On them will God pour His mercy: for God is Exalted in power, Wise. (9:71)
If any do deeds of righteousness, be they male or female - and have faith, they will enter Heaven, and not the least injustice will be done to them. (3-124)
Then shall anyone who has done an atoms weight of good, see it! And anyone who has done an atoms weight of evil, shall see it. (99:7-8)
And among His Signs is this: He created for you soul-mates from among yourselves that ye may dwell in tranquillity with them, and He plants love and mercy between your (hearts): verily in that are Signs for those who reflect. (30-21)
Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: of what the earth produces, as well as their own (human) kind and (other) things of which they have no knowledge of. (36; 36)
For Muslim men and women, for believing men and women, for devout men and women, for truthful men and women, for men and women who are patient and constant, for men and women who humble themselves, for men and women who give in Charity, for men and women who fast (and deny themselves), for men and women who guard their chastity, and for men and women who engage much in Gods praise; for them has God prepared forgiveness and great reward. (33:35)
and Some of Muhammads sayings:
Women are but shaqaiq (twin halves or sisters) of men
I commend you to be good to women
Heaven lies at the feet of mothers
The best of you are the kindest to their wives
Seeking knowledge is mandatory for every Muslim male and female
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 13, 2007 at 2:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Billy the Dik on 6/13 at 10:03 am
(235 comments total)
ITW, youre really that thick? Zionism is the victim of the holocaust? No, Butcher Boy, Jews were the victims. Ideologies do not bleed, they suck blood. Your anthropomorphism of a poison idea is a dead giveaway that YOU are a victim of deep, dark indoctrination. “
Billy, I suggest you take a course in remedial reading and comprehension. I never said anything of the sort. Try actually READING what I write. You’ll find insults just make you look stupid when you attack someone for something they never said.
Unless, of course, you are deliberately making stuff up to see if, when you fling enough of it, any sticks. Which I would not put past you.
Still trying to figure out the Horst Wessel Song (your future anthem) or did you actually “google the Internets” as fearless Lead Ignoramous would say?
Report thisBy nahida, June 13, 2007 at 8:29 am #
About anti-Semitism
Enough is enough
People talk with liberty about Muslim extremists, and Christian fundamentalists; but they stop short of uttering the forbidden word Jewish extremists
read the reast here:
http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/1190/58/
Report thisBy nahida, June 13, 2007 at 8:23 am #
London demo:
http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/1647/58/
Report thisBy nahida, June 13, 2007 at 8:22 am #
Israel, ‘Zionist ghetto’ not state
Sat, 09 Jun 2007 08:50:36
Israel’s former parliament speaker Avraham Burg has branded Israel as a ‘Zionist ghetto’ in his newly-published book , scoffing at the regime’s self-definition as a Jewish state.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=12519§ionid=351020202
In an interview published in Ha’aretz daily on Friday, Avraham Burg said that this self-definition is the key to the regime’s ruin.
“It [Israel] can’t work anymore. It’s explosive. It’s dynamite.” said Burg, parliamentary speaker from 1999 to 2003.
Burg has newly written a book, Defeating Hitler in which Ha’aretz says he describes Israel as a “Zionist ghetto” and compares Israeli behavior in the occupied Palestinian territories against Palestinians to that of Nazi Germany.
Also a former chairman of the semi-governmental Jewish Agency responsible for immigration to Israel, Burg took issue with the law of return, under which any Jew is able to come to live in the occupied lands.
“The law of return is the mirror image of Hitler. I don’t want Hitler to define my identity,” he said.
A former activist in the anti-settlement Peace Now movement, Burg is today a businessman who considers Israeli society paranoid and comparable to pre-Nazi Germany.
Burg slammed Israel for construction of a separation wall in the West Bank, saying, “The separation fence is a fence against paranoia ... There is something so xenophobic about it. So insane,” he said.
He also criticized targeted assassinations carried out by the Israeli army against Palestinian resistance fighters, comparing them to murder.
Report thisBy Charles Barton, June 13, 2007 at 8:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“So the Palestinians possess a few rockets with which to strike back.” - Ernest
Ernest, This is typical, anti-Zionist language. First the Palestinians have launched not a few rockets, but thousands, a fact which your language so deceitfully hides. Secondly the Palestinians are not striking back at Israel, the entire rocket campaign is being paid for by Iran. The rocket launching squad gets paid $20,000 a launch. The Hamas government, the elected government of the Palestinians, knows who is launching the rockets, and knows where the rockets are built. They have the power to put a stop to the rockets if they chose. But they have Iranian paymasters too, and the Iranians tell them to allow the rocket launches.
Hamas is openly anti-Semetic. It openly states that its goal is to destroy israel. Its spokesmen call for the killing of all Jews, not just Isrelis. These are the people you support. These are the people you sympasthize with. You aback a bunch of anti-semetic, murderous thugs and pretend to be on the side of Justice and truth. Look at what Hamas is doing in Hamas. %6 people killed in Gaza sonce the weekend, more dying every day. If they were being killed by Israelis, you would be screaming, but being the hypocritical little twirp that you are, you are utterly silent about Hamas’s violence toward Palestinians.
Ernest, When Israelis defend themselves against Palestinian violence, you compare them to Nazis. When Palesti9nians try to kill Israeli civilians, you justify them. When the Palestinian government begins to slaughter the people of Gaza, you fall strangely silent. And you no doubt think yoourself to be a good person.
Report thisBy nahida, June 13, 2007 at 8:16 am #
Jewish Protests Against The Occupation
Jews around the world defy the Zionist governement’s demand for blind support, step out of their homes today to say NO! We won’t keep quiet! We reject Israel’s brutal violations of Human Rights and International Law. Reports from NYC, London, Sydney, Montreal, Toronto, Paris, Boston, Edinburgh, Berne
oznik-news
11 Dec. 2000
We held banners (in the rain!) in berkeley and oakland (california) during morning and evening rush hour at major intersections (on monday), with slogans like JEWS FOR JUSTICE SAY STOP AID TO ISRAEL, JEWS FOR JUSTICE CALL FOR PROTECTION FOR PALESTINIANS, JEWS FOR JUSTICE SAY END THE OCCUPATION!
in solidarity—
penny rosenwasser, Middle East Children’s Alliance
read article:
http://www.oznik.com/news/001211.html
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 13, 2007 at 7:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Tony Wicher on 6/13 at 12:35 am
(93 comments total)
Re #77349 by Inherit The Wind on 6/12 at 10:38 am
(Unregistered commenter)
Teitelbaum is an criminally idiotic and morally bankrupt. Jews werent responsible for the Holocaust and anyone who says they were, like Teitelbaum, is scum.
But that isnt what Teitelbaum says. He precisely does NOT say that Jews were responsible for the Holocaust. What he does say is that ZIONISTS were responsible for the Holocaust. According to him, Jews were their innocent victims. I know you are having a hard time distinguishing Jews from Zionists in your own mind, because Zionists have done everything possible to identify them, but the fact is that they are completely different things. To me Zionists are apostate Jews who have substituted this secular nationalism for their former religion, and they are misleading Jewish people into an untenable situation which will ultimately result in their destruction, unless they repudiate Zionism. Rabbi Teitelbaum understands this, and so do many other rabbis. “
I stand by my original statement. Neither Jews in general nor Zionists in particular are responsible for the Holocaust. It is morally reprehensible to blame the victims and inferentially excuse the Nazis, which of course, is what you are both doing.
It is also false history. The rise of the peculiar and unusually vehement form of anti-Semitism that Hitler guided was not his invention, but grew out of a bastard mis-interpretation of Darwin’s evolution, and Spencer’s variation on it, Social Darwinism. In the late 19th century, in Vienna (Hitler was Austrian, remember), this new strand “Biological Racism” emerged. Unlike traditional anti-Semitism in Europe and the Arab world, where by conversion to Christianity or Islam a Jew would be accepted, in “Biological Racism” such was not possible. A Jew was a Jew even if he rose to become a Cardinal in the Roman Catholic Church.
Because of the extraordinary assimilation of Jews in Germany, which had been one of the more liberal and tolerant places in Europe since at least Frederick the Great, the conversion criterion was irrelevant. There were many philosphical thinkers in Greater Germania in the 19th Century (Marx and Engels were among them) but while many were great, many more were 3rd rate thinkers, and it was these who latched on to Social Darwinism and twisted it into a global conflict of races (as Marx and Engels saws a global conflict of classes).
Combine this with Germany’s long-standing inferiority complex, after all, Germany didn’t exist as a nation until 1871, and the constant plaint that she was denied her “place in the sun” Jews became the easy scapegoat.
Why would Zionism feed this? The Zionists wanted the Jews to leave Germany (and Europe) and move to Israel. The “biological racists” wanted the Jews out of Germany too—Hitler later toyed with Madagascar as the place to ship all Jews.
So, TW, you can see why I STILL stand by my statement. The history of Germany and anti-semitism that led to Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka was no knee-jerk reaction, especially not to Zionism. To blame the Holocaust on Zionism is to excuse National Socialism. That’s like a murderer telling telling the victim it’s the victim’s fault.
It is morally bankrupt. Teitelbaum is morally bankrupt. He’s not ignorant, he knows this history. I’m hoping you are merely ignorant and now will educate yourself on this history. But if you continue to hold this position in light of facts I will view you as equally bankrupt. I hope not.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 13, 2007 at 4:35 am #
Re #77349 by Inherit The Wind on 6/12 at 10:38 am
(Unregistered commenter)
“Teitelbaum is an criminally idiotic and morally bankrupt. Jews werent responsible for the Holocaust and anyone who says they were, like Teitelbaum, is scum.”
But that isn’t what Teitelbaum says. He precisely does NOT say that “Jews were responsible for the Holocaust”. What he does say is that ZIONISTS were responsible for the Holocaust. According to him, Jews were their innocent victims. I know you are having a hard time distinguishing Jews from Zionists in your own mind, because Zionists have done everything possible to identify them, but the fact is that they are completely different things. To me Zionists are apostate Jews who have substituted this secular nationalism for their former religion, and they are misleading Jewish people into an untenable situation which will ultimately result in their destruction, unless they repudiate Zionism. Rabbi Teitelbaum understands this, and so do many other rabbis.
Report thisBy Robert, June 13, 2007 at 3:28 am #
The Rot of Occupation
40 BAD YEARS
By Uri Avnery
6/11/2007
“IT CANNOT be denied: 40 years of occupation have changed the state of Israel beyond recognition.
That is obvious in all spheres of life. All of them have been contaminated.
18-year old youngsters, most of who have been brought up by decent parents as moral human beings, are drafted into the army, enter the brutal subculture of their units and receive an indoctrination that justifies every act of brutality against Arabs. Only a few rare individuals are able to withstand the pressure. After three years, the majority leave the army as tough men with blunted sensibilities. The brutality in our streets, the routine killings around the discotheques, the proliferation of rape and violence within the family - all these have undoubtedly been influenced by the day-to-day reality of the occupation. After all, it’s the same people who are doing it.
A policeman who is sent to Hebron and the Hawara checkpoint, who treats the inhabitants there as inferior creatures, who acts sadistically or condones the sadism of his comrades - will return into a different person when he returns the next day to Tel Aviv, Haifa or Shefa-Amr? Will he wake up the next morning, miraculously, as a devoted servant of his fellow-citizens in a democratic society?
For years now, the security services, the police and the army have been lying about events in the occupied territories. Lying has become routine. Few journalists in the world now accept these statements unquestioningly. And when lying becomes norm in one sector, the mendacity doesn’t stop there. The liars of the army, the police and the other services have gotten used to lying about other matters, too.
In the “territories”, corruption has a ball. Military government officers take off their uniforms and get involve in shady businesses. Capitalist barons also profit from connections with them. Of course, this is not the only source of the corruption that has become a bane of the state, but it is surely a contributing factor.
THE OCCUPATION causes rot, which penetrates all the pores of the national organism.”
Here is the link for the rest of Uri Avnery’s article:
Report thishttp://www.counterpunch.org/avnery06112007.html
By Robert, June 13, 2007 at 2:02 am #
Billy…I think that “looney/lefty=ephraim” is low on his sedative/depression pills. He just woke up from a deep delusional sleeping period.
I must say that he is trying to “post” something new on this forum, but so far I have NOT SEEN a “ball of fire”. Its the ...SOS!
One can see that loves & craves attention. He is trying to win some form of recognition for wanting to NUKE the Arab population from the face of this earth.
One really wonders about his insane and hysterical behavior. “Loonie/lefty” is dead serious with his wishes to cause a mass killing.
What form of “terrorism” teaching, brainwashing & massive infection did this disturbed “looney zionist” receive & where?
“Looney/lefty”...that BABOON is perched on your abscessed pus filled skull. You are looking pretty bad in that lonely manure filled stall.
THEY NEED YOU IN ISRAEL. YOU MOTIVES & YOUR ZIONIST GARBAGE RESEMBLE THE ISRAELI ASSASSIN…BARUCH GOLDSTEIN. HE MASSACRED MORE THAN 2 DOZEN PALESTINIANS WHILE THEY WERE PRAYING IN THEIR MOSQUE.
“LOONIE/LEFTY” IS DOING OUR HARD WORK FOR US. HE IS SHOWING US WHAT A REAL ZIONIST BELIEVES IN…PURE RACISM & HATRED!
I DON’T THINK THAT YOU KNOW ANY BETTER…LOONEY/LEFTY. A BABOON WITH 2 WEEKS OF TRAINING HAS MORE COMMON SENSE & HUMANITY THAN YOU OR WILL EVER HAVE!
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 13, 2007 at 1:12 am #
Let me ask you, Charles Barton, if the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto had the rockets and weaponry you describe, would you have critized them for using those weapons against the Nazis?
The words “terrorist” and “terrorism” are Orwellian as is the so-called “war on terror.” The tactic which governments describe as “terrorism” is, in fact, the tactic that weaker foes in a conflict must resort to. It is also known as guerilla warfare.
During World War II, the Nazis used a word to describe the resistance movements throughout occupied Europe. They called them “terrorists.” Franco’s fascists used the same word to describe the remnants of the Republican forces which had taken to the hills in southern Spain after the end of the civil war. No doubt the British forces in the American Revolutionary War would have regarded the irregular forces, Minute Men, who picked them off from hidden positions as “terrorists.” When I served in Vietnam, most often it would have been suicide for the VC or NVA to attack head on, so they resorted to planting mines; placing pungee stakes in hidden pits; firing rockets at our APCs from hidden positions; lobbing a few mortars at our base camps in the dead of night, then fleeing so they could live to fight another day. While I lost some close friends to these tactics, I don’t condemn them from using it. What other choice did they have?
So the Palestinians possess a few rockets with which to strike back. Israel possesses the world’s fourth most powerful military. In just the past six months Israel has not only unleashed terror from above on the hapless Palestinians of Gaza and the West Bank. Israel assaulted neiboring Lebanon with massive numbers of cluster bombs. Israel’s use of collective punishment against the civilian populations of Palestine and Lebanon amount to war crimes under the principles of both the UN and Nuremberg Charter.
But then the continued occupation is itself a violation of UN Resolution 242 passed in the aftermath of the 6-day war. It never ceases to amaze me how people can demand that countries like Iran and Iraq comply with UN Resolutions on pain of a threatened US invasion, yet Israel has wilfully violated the Charter and Resolutions over the past 40 years and all we can hear from apologists, like yourself, is how bad these Palestinian “terrorists” are.
Does that mean I approve of either suicide bombers or the launching of rockets? No! Of course not. I long ago posted that violence is self-defeating and that those who resort to it become what they despise. Indeed, there is a sad and twisted irony in this mess. The Zionists have become so consumed with their hatred of the objectified “other” that the children and granchildren of the oppressed in the Warsaw ghetto have become the oppressor—and that, my friend, is a real human tragedy, not only for Palestinians but for Israelis and, indeed, the rest of the world which has been dragged into this endless quagmire—all to allow the persistence of an occupation which by law should have ended in 1967.
P.S., Just a suggestion, but I think you would do well to proof read before posting.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 13, 2007 at 12:27 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“re comment #77349 by Inherit the Wind. I would agree that Jews werent responsible for the Holocaust. I would not suggest, as you do, that anyone who suggests otherwise is scum. I suspect that such individuals would run the gammut from neo-Nazis to the utterly uninformed. I will not label as scum those who are merely ignorant.”
Y’know, You make a point. I can’t argue with that—but two points: 1) You gotta INCREDIBLY ignorant to say something like that an not be morally bankrupt. 2) Rabbi Teitelbaum is certainly not ignorant and IS morally bankrupt.
You keep missing the fundamental difference between Nazi Germany and Israel. Germany’s survival was never in danger from Jews or anyone else until Hitler put them in danger. Israel’s destruction has been the constant goal of many Arabs, including leaders of nations for 60 straight years. Israel’s siege mentality is clearly justified.
Nazi tactics are not justified by anyone. But what happens when every moral rule is broken by the other side? When ANY humanitarian action like letting an ambulance through, is corrupted by the enemy stuffing it with explosives? When a pizza parlor full of children is deliberately targeted for bombing how can the Palestinians claim the moral high ground? How can you?
I do not want to see the Palestinians slaughtered. I would love to see them living peacefully side by side with Israelis rebuilding the personal and economic bonds that, when strong enough, make war impossible. But it has to be as two states now.
But even today the Palestinians are slaughtering each other—Al Fatah and Hamas are ramping up the violence as each tries to violently crush the other. Why would Israelis give up security and trust them?
They came so, so close to peace only to throw it away to continue the infatada. Why?
Report thisBy Charles Barton, June 12, 2007 at 11:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As I posted elsewhere, I believe that present-day Gaza bears a striking resemblance to the Warsaw Ghetto, complete with a walled in and increasingly desparate multitude. - Ernest Canning
Ernest there a few bery monor differences. Fof example the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto were not firing rockets at the Germans every day. The Jews did not possess tens of thousands of AK-47s, thousands of tons of high explosives, RPGs, Mortars, and bombardment rockets. The Jews had no choice, the Germans were determint to destroy them. The Palestinians of Gaza, can start firing their rockets. The can renounce the distruction of Israel as a goal. If they make peace, the gates will open, and Gazans can pass into Israel freely as they did between 1967 and 2000. If the Palestinians make peace, Israel will be glad to help reconstruct the Gazan infrastructure. If the Palestinians make peace, the Israelus have expressed a willingness to expand gaza, at the expense of turning part of the pre-1967 Israel over to the {alestinians, in order to expand Gaza. If the Palestinians make peace They will be able to live in peace with dignity, in their own country. If the Palestinians make peacethey will have to forever give up the dream of destroyi8ng Israel. They will have to give up their dream of humiliating the Jews. That the Hamas leadership cannot tolerate. The Hamas leadership prefers to continue with their insane dream. Hamas would prefer that the people of Gaza live in misery, that they continue to suffer endlessly. Hamas would prefer to fight a cival war with Fatah, a civil woar in which most of the casualitites were Palestinian civilians. Like the warsaw ghetto, yjr situation in Gaza is truely terrible, but unlike the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto, the Gazans have a way out.
Report thisBy cann4ing, June 12, 2007 at 9:27 pm #
re comment #77349 by Inherit the Wind. I would agree that “Jews weren’t responsible for the Holocaust.” I would not suggest, as you do, that anyone who suggests otherwise is “scum.” I suspect that such individuals would run the gammut from neo-Nazis to the utterly uninformed. I will not label as “scum” those who are merely ignorant.
My problem with you, and your fellow Zionists, is that you refuse to recognize the extent to which the roles have been reversed. As I posted elsewhere, I believe that present-day Gaza bears a striking resemblance to the Warsaw Ghetto, complete with a walled in and increasingly desparate multitude. The only thing missing is for someone in the Zionist camp to begin proposing a “final solution,” though your pal, Ephraim “Lefty” Pesach came close to it in suggesting that Palestinians do not have a right to live. If my assessment is accurate, while I personally detest violence and feel it is self-defeating, I would question whether I would have any more right to criticize Palestinians for taking up armed resistance than I would have had to criticize the Jews of the Warsaw ghetto for their armed resistance to the Nazis.
The problem I have with a number of posters on both sides, but especially those eminating from lilmamzer and “lefty,” is that they are only willing to focus on acts of the other side. They never recognize the humanity of the other or the disparate impact of this brutal 40 year occupation.
I am writing this post to you, not to lilmamzer and “lefty,” because I sense in you a spark of humanity, which, quite frankly, I hope to ignite. I would ask that you take the time to watch the 1 hr. 9 min. documentary video which Robert linked to in comment #76638.
When I was in college, my professors often noted that when you undertake a subject you would otherwise be disinclined to accept, receive it with a sympathetic mind so as to understand first what an author has to say. If you reject a topic as out of hand before you have thoroughly explored it, you will never gain an understanding.
I would ask that you use a sympathetic approach in watching the video. If after doing so, you have substantive criticism (as opposed to name-calling rejection) as to why the documentary’s central thesis regarding the occupation is wrong, I would be delighted to consider it, and I am sure many of the other posters, e.g. Peter RV, Robert, Tony Wicher, would welcome this as well.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2007 at 8:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Billy the Dik on 6/12 at 4:20 pm
(210 comments total)
ITH, the Whore Weasel Song? Is that your autobigraphical ditty? I dont know it but if youll hum a few balls “
Predictably nasty, predictably vulgar, predictably idiotic.
Do you REALLY think you can insult me by revealing your incredible ignorance?
Unpredictably even more ignorant than I thought.
You and Robert can go look up the Horst Wessel Song and make it your anthem. It fits you guys perfectly.
Report thisBy Charles Barton, June 12, 2007 at 7:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“ITW & Barton…are just frothing and moaning at the mouth. They have NO substance at all.” - Robert
Robert, Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me. The last time I frothed at the mouth I had swollowed too much beer, but i did no moan. I usually do not froth at the mouth and moan when I laugh so much I fall down. You ought to read my earlier comments about pejorative language. Robert you don’t seem to understand the points I am trying to make. Perhaps I am being to harsh on you. You might actually be a 7th grader instead of just thinking like one.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2007 at 6:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Here goes Robert:
” ITW & Barton…are just frothing and moaning at the mouth. They have NO substance at all.
I think ITW needs to join his pal looney/lefty=ephraim psyche ward. No one in his/her NORMAL state of mind would make or advocate what stenchy/leftys posted. NOTICE that ITW is staying low & not even making a sound about it. He is SILENT! Just imagine if someone posted a comment to nuke Israel/Jews/zionists…what would ITW say? Would he remain SILENT as he is doing right now…in regards to his dear pal looney/lefty?
Who knows, maybe ITW shares and advocates the same message and/or agenda of the abscessed pus filled skull of…looney/lefty=ephraim ? “
**************************************
Didn’t I tell you he would do this?
“Watch, just watch: One of them will call me a feculant name and then say Im crazy, ranting and need a chill pill—as predictible as lunar eclipses!”
Robert,
Everytime someone disagrees with you, you heap abuse on them. That’s the mark of a TRUE Fascist—you cannot tolerate even a shred of an independent opinion.
Next, you’ll shriek that my ideas and opinions aren’t independent, they are dictated to me by AIPAC, the Israel Government, The Elders of Zion (and their Protocols), and, don’t forget, The Great Pumpkin. You’ll through in all sorts of disgusting substances, mainly fecal, and deem yourself highly clever.
Billy the Dik will agree with you and add his own “flavor” but at least TW is enough of a gentleman to stay clear of that.
Just like a Republican senator saying “Tax-and-Spend Democrats!” while adding a $250 million ear-mark.
When do you and Billy break out The Horst Wesel Song?
Report thisBy Robert, June 12, 2007 at 5:54 pm #
Comment #77335 by Billy TD on 6/12
Billy…your short and precise comment to “looney/lefty” is to the damn point. ONLY a truly sick & a beyond help infected “jackass” would post such vile. After all…let us consider the SOURCE!
Looney/lefty truly needs to shut the hell up & join his IDF humanity department. HE FITS THEIR STANDARDS & QUALIFICATIONS! KILL ARABS/PALESTINIANS AND CRY ANTI-SEMITISM!
Report thisBy Robert, June 12, 2007 at 5:40 pm #
Comment #77311 by Peter RV on 6/12 at 8:06 am
PRV…your assessment of our peace loving/nuke advocates zionists on this forum is correct.
THESE ZEALOTS ARE NO STRANGERS TO EACH OTHER. THEY ALL SOUND AS “ONE”...DEPENDING ON THE “ORCHESTRATED PLAN” OF THE MOMENT AND/OR DAY.
ITW & Barton…are just frothing and moaning at the mouth. They have NO substance at all.
I think ITW needs to join his pal “looney/lefty=ephraim” psyche ward. No one in his/her NORMAL state of mind would make or advocate what “stenchy/lefty’s” posted. NOTICE that ITW is staying low & not even making a sound about it. He is SILENT! Just imagine if someone posted a comment to nuke Israel/Jews/zionists…what would ITW say? Would he remain “SILENT” as he is doing right now…in regards to his “dear” pal ‘looney/lefty’?
Who knows, maybe ITW shares and advocates the same message and/or agenda of the abscessed pus filled skull of…looney/lefty=ephraim ?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2007 at 2:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
IHW,
Now you are talking my language. The Palestinians, the Israelis and also the Americans need leaders genuinely committed to peace and democracy above and beyond all else. Then there will be peace and democracy. Its that simple. What the people have now are are gangs of phonies and liars dragging them into endless war. All three peoples have had lies and hate dinned into their ears for generations and that is why they have such leaders.
On the relationship of Judaism to modern Zionism, you can argue with Grand Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum:
Six million Jews were killed as a result of the Zionists
**************************************************
Teitelbaum is an criminally idiotic and morally bankrupt. Jews weren’t responsible for the Holocaust and anyone who says they were, like Teitelbaum, is scum. The old-time Chassidim who are against the foundation of Israel until Moshiach (The Messiah) comes will say ANYTHING to support their position. Quoting him is like quoting Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson right after 9/11—that it was punishment for tolerating Gays and liberals in America.
TW: It’s time you got real and wake up—the coffee’s brewing. Time to smell it.
This from the top left of Today’s NYTimes:
“Palestinian Leaders Targeted in Rising Violence
By ISABEL KERSHNER and GRAHAM BOWLEY
Published: June 12, 2007
JERUSALEM, June 12 Gunmen fired a rocket-propelled grenade at the home of Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of Hamas today, and mortar shells hit the Gaza City office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah, as the worst factional fighting among Palestinians in nearly a month intensified significantly, taking the conflict closer to what seemed like full-blown civil war. “
The Palestinians are launching a full-scale terrorist war on each other for who gets to be Captain of The Titanic. And you want Israel to open its doors and lay down its defenses and trust THESE maniacs with their childrens’ lives? You go first and we’ll see if YOU survive!
TW, you missed my point: The Palestinians would MURDER any Gandhi or Mandella who appeared, and do it summarily, then get back to their internecine gang war.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 12, 2007 at 2:25 pm #
re #77254 by Inherit The Wind on 6/12 at 4:26 am
(Unregistered commenter)
“I would love to see a Mandela or Gandhi emerge, with strength, dignity, moral force—and a bullet-proof vest. The Palestinians need one—and the Israelis would do well with one too.”
IHW,
Now you are talking my language. The Palestinians, the Israelis and also the Americans need leaders genuinely committed to peace and democracy above and beyond all else. Then there will be peace and democracy. It’s that simple. What the people have now are are gangs of phonies and liars dragging them into endless war. All three peoples have had lies and hate dinned into their ears for generations and that is why they have such leaders.
On the relationship of Judaism to modern Zionism, you can argue with Grand Rebbe Joel Teitelbaum:
“Six million Jews were killed as a result of the Zionists”
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/rabbi_quotes/vayoelmoshe1.cfm#6Million
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2007 at 12:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
” Why is it NOT ok to use the same as above on Israelis, Jews…etc…? Why is ITW screaming on this forum & keeps sarcastically hinting directly and indirectly about anti-semitism?
Why DOESNT ITW hold the same logic/standards when his zionist pals spew their labels/names, such as, Arabs, Moslems, Jihadists…etc on us? Isnt that RACISM & fits in the same definition category as ...anti-semitic and the N word?
Why is ITW SILENT when the worst form of RACISM is being used by his zionist pals on this forum?
Can ITW see further than his zionist ideologys circle allows him to see? Where is the application & LOGIC? “
**************************************
Robert,
Perhaps if you went back and actually READ what I wrote you might find some surprises: Like my opinion of Sharon and Netanyahu (and others) aren’t much better than yours.
You might also find that I think the radical right in Israel has made a huge mess where peace was possible.
I’m aware that there are fanatics who want to tear down the Dome of The Rock, just like there are fanatics who want to blow up The Western Wall. They are both wrong.
But the idea that Jews in Israel are being held to a far, FAR higher standard by the critics than their neighbors shows that their critics (like you) aren’t interested in the for-show straw man Justice, or Fairness, merely in eradicating the Jews from the Middle East.
You continually myopically see only the conflict between Israeli and Palestinian. You ignore all the politics and pressures from the other Arab nations to keep this conflict going and to NEVER let it be resolved. Arab politicians who seriously work to end the conflict GET SHOT! (remember Anwar Sadat? How about all the Lebanese Gemayiels who have been assassinated for advocating a negotiated peace?)
When every Arab leader who advocates sitting down and negotiating gets murdered by his fellow Arabs, what Israeli can ever believe peace is possible? If every documentand every speech someone (like Hamas) makes calls for the destruction of Israel and the death of EVERY Jew, I guess you feel that’s OK.
I guess if it was you and your family you might not think it quite so “Ok”.
Report thisBy Charles Barton, June 12, 2007 at 12:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Isnt calling someone an ARAB or a MOSLEM or a Jihadist in a derogatory way the SAME AS THE N word?” - Robert
Gee Robert, When Egyptians refer to each other by the “A” word, are they being racist? Or is this a special exception like Afro-Americans using the “N” word with each other. When a follower of Islam, refers to devotees of his religion using the “M” word, is he being racist? Might it be considered racist, by Robert’s standard, to refer to followers of the Religion of Moses by using the “J” word? Are we demeaning members of the radical Islamic organization, Islamic Jihad, by using the other “J” word to classify them. In fact I must wonder if “Islamic” - lest call it “I” word 1, and “Islamicist” - “I” word 2 - are all racist terms. What about Palestinians - the “P” word. Come to think of it, calling someone Robert has suddenly become pretty insulting in my book. Maybe we should refer to it as the “R” word.
Report thisBy Peter RV, June 12, 2007 at 12:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ref.#77292 by Robert.
Robert,
Report thisThese people don’t have any arguments. All that is left to them is to deny the truth and they know that we know what the truth is. Hence their resort to what they think are insults, when in fact, it is an admission of their impotence to stop us from having a civilized conversation.
I have also noticed that they disappear for a day or two, to reappear with their usual avalanche of inarticulate screems. Apparently they have their separate pow-wow out of the forum, to receive instructions.
The theme of the discussion should have been this Chris Hedges’ magnificent account of the Palestinian ordeal after fourty years of a most brutal occupation. The Goons, as predictable, havent produced a single interesting detail or even expression, as a contribution. Their facts insofar as they are, are totally irrelevant to the point, and their arguments, as usual, are obscenities.
It is a herd instinct of the ‘tribe’.
By Robert, June 12, 2007 at 12:03 pm #
Comments #77297, #77296. #77295 by Nahida on 6/12
Nahida,
Your comments are really powerful. Israel’s brutal IDF using Palestinians civilians & children as “NUMAN SHIELDS” on “youtube” videos.
Those IDF killers are armed to their teeth, but they are still using children as human Shields? Wow…what a gruesome killing machine!
I am sure that we are only seeing a fraction of a percent of what really goes on over there.
Imagine if these videos were seen by a large portion of the American people…I think that it will start an outrage by people who stand up & believe in fairness, TRUTH, justice.
JUST THINK WHAT ISRAEL’S IDF ARE USING TO KILL PALESTINIAN CHILDREN AND UNARMED INNOCENT CIVILIANS? THEY ARE USING OUR AMERICAN MADE WEAPONS THAT ARE GIVEN TO ISRAEL…FOR FREE…AT NO COST TO THE ISRAELIS!
LOOK AT THE COSTS THAT PALESTINIANS AND THEIR CHILDREN HAVE TO PAY? THEY ARE PAYING WITH THEIR LIVES!
Report thisBy nahida, June 12, 2007 at 11:37 am #
To all terrorist zionists (here and elsewhere):
If you could only learn one simple fact from your existence on this planet, you would’ve achieved something:
“As you sow you shall reap”
Report thisBy nahida, June 12, 2007 at 11:21 am #
Israeli Soldiers using Palestinians as Human Shields
Report thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEd4hJNVCE&mode=related&search;=
By nahida, June 12, 2007 at 11:19 am #
Video Israel Doesn’t Want You to See
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&eurl;=
Report thisBy nahida, June 12, 2007 at 11:18 am #
Israeli troops shoot Hebron family - 05 June 07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&eurl;=
Report thisBy Robert, June 12, 2007 at 11:02 am #
Comment #77253 by Peter RV
PRV…our hysterical ranting zionists on this forum have been screaming & flailing at us with all sorts of racist names, racist labels & racist attacks. Their trails of their racist agenda are well documented in practically all their posts.
Apparently to these zionists bigots’ logic, it is quite appropriate & acceptable to label anyone who criticizes Israel & zionism’s ideolodies as Arabs, Moslems, Islamists, Jihadists…and other racist names.
TO THESE PEOPLE…THESE LABELS/NAMES ARE “NOT” RACIST. THEY DON’T BELONG IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS “ANTI-SEMITIC”.
Isn’t calling someone an “ARAB” or a “MOSLEM” or a “Jihadist” in a derogatory way the SAME AS THE “N” word? Isn’t that RACISM and BIGOTRY?
So why is it acceptable for zionists/Israelis and others to use these derogatory names and/or racist labels and apparently its ok for them to use in their every day conversations, talk shows, internet forums and so on…?
Why is it NOT ok to use the same as above on Israelis, Jews…etc…? Why is ITW screaming on this forum & keeps sarcastically hinting directly and indirectly about “anti-semitism?
Why “DOESN’T” ITW hold the same “logic/standards” when his zionist pals spew their labels/names, such as, Arabs, Moslems, Jihadists…etc… on us? Isn’t that RACISM & fits in the same definition category as ...anti-semitic and the “N” word?
Why is ITW SILENT when the worst form of RACISM is being used by his zionist pals on this forum?
Can ITW see further than his zionist ideology’s circle allows him to see? Where is the application & LOGIC?
Report thisBy nahida, June 12, 2007 at 10:45 am #
Gaza air strikes footage - 17 May 07:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLUfUvciSbQ&eurl;=
but “peaceful” zionist, ( jewish terrorist) lefty is not happy still, he wants to nuke Gaza and the rest of the Arab world!!
Report thisBy nahida, June 12, 2007 at 10:40 am #
Burning Conscience: Israeli Soldiers Speak Out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37MFa7ZKQWo&mode=related&search;=
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 12, 2007 at 8:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“In the face of the incredibly onerous Israeli oppression, do you think it is possible for Palestinians to unite around a leadership comnmitted to democracy and nonviolence? Can your people elevate from among themselves a Mandela, a Gandhi?”
Yes, that would be wonderful, for everyone, until Hamas slaughters him.
TW, your knowledge of Judaism is lacking. The Passover Seder, for 2000 years, since the Diaspora, has ended with the phrase “Next year in Jerusalem”.
The modern movement of Herzl is, however, linked to the extreme prosecution that occured in Europe, especially Eastern Europe, in the 19th and early 20th century. The “Pogrom” existed long before Auschwitz, and was an Eastern European phrase. In Tsarist Russia, Jews were seen as a regular scapegoat to blame when the Russian aristocracy and autocracy really screwed up, as they did a lot.
So they would blame the Jews and send the Cossacks to burn some villages. I lost a great-grandmother in one of those back in the 1890’s.
But what you have consistently failed to acknowledge is that the Zionist movement was a search for a SAFE homeland, naturally based around the holy sites of the religion.
You would have Israel give up the Western Wall. “Return to the 1967 boundaries” means just that. You might as well ask Saudi Arabia to give up the Ka’aba in Mecca, or Medina. Or ask the Pope to give up the Vatican.
TW: You keep dodging a fundamental question: Why is it OK for the 22 Arab Moslem states in the Middle-East to practice discrimation, segregation and even genocide (Darfur) but Israelis are to be condemned, blockaded, boycotted for far less transgressions?
Make no mistake: Since the death of Rabin and the ouster of Peres, the Israeli Govt has been run by fools and nincompoops. Olmert is about the worst excuse for a “liberal” I’ve ever seen. They need to clean up their situation.
Yet the Palestinians have turned corruption and violent intimidation amongst themselves into an art form. How can Hamas POSSIBLY live in peaceful harmony with Jews when they can’t even do it with fellow Sunni Arabs who are also Palestinian?
I would love to see a Mandela or Gandhi emerge, with strength, dignity, moral force—and a bullet-proof vest. The Palestinians need one—and the Israelis would do well with one too.
Report thisBy Peter RV, June 12, 2007 at 8:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Everyone knows who an Anti-Semite is.
Report thisIt is one of those who is capable of doubting anything about the Holocaust, or one who wants another Holocaust, you know, by opposing the Israeli “security” measures. Generally, the ones who publicly fail to approve the code of conduct of the IDF in those eternally occupied “territories”. To these one can add various Jew-Haters such as Nazies or Catholics or those simply envious of the Jews. As one can see , we are, what may be called- a multi-cultural club.
But, what about the Semites?
They somehow fail to declare their existance. Strange, isn’t it, that we have no definition for them. I am proposing here one for the debate :
All those who, in their infinite adoration of Israel, by a pavlovian reaction, attack preventively
anyone who tries to contradict them, by calling them “Anti-Semites”.
I sense a weakness in this definition: to define something by its “Anti”, but this is for discussion.
I was always taught that Arabs were also Semites but our scholars (Dershowits and Co)have convinced me that Anti-Semitism has nothing to do with them, worse, the Arabs themselves are anti-semitic when it comes to their opinions about-Israel. Let it be so.
The concept of Semites doesn’t encompass all the Jews, only the ‘tribal’ ones (some of these we have on our forum- so, special definition un-necessary). It includes quite a bit of our politicians, AIPAC bought or controlled, so the crowd looks superficially diverse but unshakable in its strict credo.
I am, myself, a ‘sui generis’ anti-Semite who believes that we are having more and more adherants as the events develop in the way as to confirm our predictions. This anti-Semitism is not only, not harmfull but it is desirable and indispensible if we are to restore our Republic, which is falling rapidly into a fatalistic, nazi-religious delirium.
It consists of a rule of proportionality:
Anti-Semitism must be strictly proportional to the acts of abomination of the Semites (Israel included), which is the only way we can send the message to the Semites- to change their ways.
As they start behaving humainly (i.e. listening to Norman Finkelstein,instead of trying to crucify him) our hostility would vanish.
By lilmamzer, June 12, 2007 at 7:11 am #
#77225 by Tony Wicher:
Amen, sister. In the face of the incredibly onerous Israeli oppression, do you think it is possible for Palestinians to unite around a leadership comnmitted to democracy and nonviolence? Can your people elevate from among themselves a Mandela, a Gandhi?
Amen, Amen, Amen.
Here’s what happened in Gaza today:
—————————
Ismail Haniyeh unscathed in RPG attack
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
GAZA CITY, June 12, 2007 -
A rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) hit the home of Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas on Tuesday, in what Hamas said was an attempted assassination. The house was damaged, but Haniyeh and his family, who were inside, were not harmed.
The attack came during the bloodiest 24-hour period yet in latest round of Hamas-Fatah fighting, which erupted again in May, after several weeks of lull. Seventeen people were killed Monday and Tuesday, including several in street executions, as hospitals turned into battle grounds.
Both Hamas and Fatah, on Web sites and in text messages to activists, called for the execution of the other side’s military and political leaders.
A Hamas Web site described the incident as an assassination attempt. Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum accused Fatah of targeting Palestinian institutions to undermine Hamas rule. “They crossed all the red lines,” he said.
Late Monday, gunmen, apparently from Hamas, laid siege to the house of Jamal Abu al-Jediyan, the senior Fatah official in northern Gaza, then dragged him outside and killed him. Medics said he was hit with 45 bullets.
Early Tuesday, three women and a child were killed when Hamas militants attacked the home of a senior Fatah security official with mortars and grenades, security officials said. The gunmen seized Hassan Abu Rabie and killed his 14-year-old son and three other women in the house, hospital officials said.
Also, Fatah gunmen stormed the house of a Hamas lawmaker and burned it to the ground.
A bloody clash took place Monday in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun. Fatah and Hamas gunmen exchanged fire near the hospital, killing a Hamas supporter. The battle then moved to the hospital, where three men - a father and two sons from the Fatah-allied al-Masri clan - were shot dead.
———————————
The article goes on and on…......
These are Palestinian Arabs killing other Palestinian Arabs.
What do you think they would do to the Jews?
The Jews already know the answer to that question.
That’s why Israel exists - so Jews won’t ever have to live as a minority under the rule of people like this.
That’s self-determination.
Tony Wicher - you are such a passionate advocate for the destruction of Israel - why don’t you convert to Judaism and thn go live in Gaza amongst these people and demonstrate for us how a “one-state” solution would work.
That would be the empirical way to prove your point.
You would fail of course, by being slaughtered. But at least you would have honorably tried to make your point instead of demanding, from the safety of California, that Jews offer themselves up to the slaughter to satisfy your oddball ideas.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 12, 2007 at 2:45 am #
Re #76969 by nahida on 6/11 at 2:20 am
(52 comments total)
Amen, sister. In the face of the incredibly onerous Israeli oppression, do you think it is possible for Palestinians to unite around a leadership comnmitted to democracy and nonviolence? Can your people elevate from among themselves a Mandela, a Gandhi?
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, June 12, 2007 at 2:23 am #
Re #77081 by Inherit The Wind on 6/11 at 2:09 pm
“So the anti-Semites, oops, Anti-Zionists are coming out of the closet again. I keep waiting for them to say, You know, Hitler might have been right about the Jews, oops, Zionists(chortle)
They self-righteously have come up with new ways to justify their anti-Semitism, oops, anti-Zionism that are all exactly the same old lies. Just substitute International Jewry for International Zionism and you see it the same damn thing all over again. Jewish World Domination is now Zionist Imperialism.
Nothing but code words, pioneered by the American Nazi Party.
—————————————————————————-
We have to be very careful to understand who the real “anti-Semites” are, for sure. Now racism comes in many forms, and I say Nazism is one and Zionism is another.
One of the major deceptions of Zionism is identification of Zionism with Judaism. Judaism has existed for thousands of years. Anti-semitism as I understand it begins with the Roman Catholic Church and the idea that “the Jews killed Jesus”. This idea was put into the heads of little children for two millenia, and it spawned all kinds of persecution. The Nazis just took advantage of this pre-existing condition for a scapegoat to misdirect the German people’s attention while they went about taking power.
Zionism, the idea of a “return” of Jews to a Jewish state in Palestine, is not thousands of years old. It was born toward the end of the 19th century, born in the fevered brain of Theodore Herzl only a generation before Nazism was born in the equally fevered brain of one Adolph Schickelgruber. I wouldn’t doubt it if Hitler read Herzel and got his inspiriation there.
Zionism is racism, and calling those who call it what it is “anti-Semitic” is precisely to give those very Nazis that you are talking about the cover and respectablility they need. When Jews support Israel no matter what it does, no matter how immoral its behavior, this also gives real anti-Semites cover and respectablility. Thus, objectively, Zionism and Nazism work hand in hand, and they always have. Both are a danger to democracy, and both should be seen as such by all Americans, especially Jewish Americans. They should be more alarmed than any other group. They must see where this is all heading and dissociate themselves from Zionism.
Here is an article from the “Jews Against Zionism” website.
“Zionism Promotes Anti-Semitism”
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained we must, above all, make it an international political issue.
Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome final solution of the Jewish question. In his Diaries, page 19, Herzl stated Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.
Zionist reliance on Anti-Semitism to further their goals continues to this day. Studies of immigration records reflect increased immigration to the Zionist state during times of increased anti-Semitism. Without a continued inflow of Jewish immigrants to the state of “Israel”, it is estimated that within a decade the Jewish population of the Zionist state will become the minority.
In order to maintain a Jewish majority in the state of “Israel”, its leaders promote anti-Semitism throughout the world to “encourage” Jews to leave their homelands and seek “refuge”.
The rest of the article may be viewed at
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/zionismpromotes.cfm
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 11, 2007 at 11:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Notice how the anti-semites, oops! (heh, heh!) anti-“zionists” call everyone names who challenge them. Notice that those names are all feculant? And, of course, since Truthdig has reveiled itself to be anti-semitic—OOPS!—“anti-zionist” they let it happen.
That’s an old Nazi trick as well—name-calling. Constant, continuous, repetitive and redolant hate-filled, until murder and genocide are justified.
In 1921 and 1922, they sang
“Death to Walther Rathenau,
That goddam rotten Jewish sow!”
And sure enough, in 1922, Dr. Walther Rathenau, the Foreign Minister of Germany, was assassinated. The killers barely served 8 years.
Oh, yes—they were anti-Semitic, WHOOPS!!!! “anti-Zionist”. See, the Jews were taking over Germany and Rathenau was proof of that.
Sounds exactly the same as the Jew-haters on this board, who pretend they love Jews but hate “Zionists”. “See? The Jews, Oops! “Zionists”(chortle) are running America!
Bastard nazis using our own freedoms against us to destroy our freedom.
Watch, just watch: One of them will call me a feculant name and then say I’m crazy, ranting and need a chill pill—as predictible as lunar eclipses!
Report thisBy Robert, June 11, 2007 at 8:36 pm #
There goes “stenchy/lefty” he gets knocked down by a “baboon” with “ONLY” one weeks training.
Its been one knockdown after another for ole…stenchy/lefty=ephraim. We are all witnessing his failures and humiliations…almost on a daily basis. I think that he still has a black/blue lump on his left jaw…it was that left hook from Peter RV !!! Lefty…Just can’t seem to forget that! Who could?
HAVE YOU GOT SOMETHING NEW…LEFTY=EPHRAIM? ARE YOU NOT CAPABLE OR WHAT? TELL YOUR HELPERS TO GIVE YOU SOMETHING BEYOND “BABOON” IQ LEVELS…FOR YOU TO TYPE & POST.
COME ON STENCHY…GIVE US YOUR BEST. YOU ARE LOOKING PRETTY BAD TO ALL OF US & THE TRUTHDIG READERS.
PRODUCE SOMETHING ...NEW ! DON’T LET YOUR PALS DOWN..YOU IDIOT!
Report thisBy lilmamzer, June 11, 2007 at 7:22 pm #
GAZA CITY, June 11, 2007 - Militants battling on the rooftops of Gaza fired on the Palestinian government headquarters on Monday, forcing the ministers to flee the building. The unusually brazen factional fighting left seven Palestinians dead, including three killed in a hospital gunbattle.
Fighting between Fatah and Hamas forces resumed over the weekend, and the attacks have grown bolder. Prime Minister Ismail Haniyehs home was shot at early Monday, and hours later a Hamas supporter was killed in a firefight near Beit Hanoun Hospital, witnesses said. The fighting shifted into the hospital, where three people with ties to Fatah were killed.
On Sunday, two militants from the rival sides were dragged onto high-rise rooftops and thrown to their deaths.
======================
Thats the same way Uday Hussein used to murder his victims. Lets give them a state!
Hey Nahida - what do you think your beloved Palestinian Arabs would do to the Jews in your absurd “one-state genocide” scenario if this is what they do to each other?
No need to answer - that’s a rhetorical question. Besides, we already know what you intend to do - it’s in the Hamas charter, it’s in the PLO covennant, it’s in your Palestinian Arab textbooks, it’s in all the terror attacks against Jewish civilinas for years and years and years.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, June 11, 2007 at 6:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
So the anti-Semites, oops, “Anti-Zionists” are coming out of the closet again. I keep waiting for them to say, “You know, Hitler might have been right about the Jews, oops, ‘Zionists’(chortle)”
They self-righteously have come up with “new” ways to justify their anti-Semitism, oops, “anti-Zionism” that are all exactly the same old lies. Just substitute “International Jewry” for “International Zionism” and you see it the same damn thing all over again. “Jewish World Domination” is now “Zionist Imperialism”.
Nothing but code words, pioneered by the American Nazi Party.
It’s just lipstick on the same old pig, by the same old pigs. The Jews, oops, “Zionists” are inherently evil.
When will they drag out the “blood libel” and “The Protocols of The Elders of Zion” and pretend they are real? After all, they already pretend that little Israel controls the most powerful nation in the history of the world, The United States of America.
Like Zeus in the Illiad, if all the nations of the world made war against us, if we chose, they couldn’t defeat us. And like Zeus, if we wanted to, we could defeat all of them—all it takes is the will.
Yet somehow, little Israel and the evil Jews, oops, “evil Zionists” magically control this awesome power. They don’t have money, they don’t have the military to match it, they don’t have ANYTHING to control us with. Must be The Devil’s Black Magic, because there’s no other way it could happen.
But the new Nazis insist on it. Who needs facts? Who needs proof? Two thousand years of hating Jews, oops, “Zionists” (chortle) is all they proof they need. They’ve been forced to go underground since 1945 but now they are back.
But they don’t hate Jews—just Zionists.
Wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn?
Report thisBy Peter RV, June 11, 2007 at 11:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ref.76874 by lilmamzer
Report thisThrowing gauntlet?
Read my poat with attention, this time, and you’ll discover the link (which is only a small part of the scandal)
By Robert, June 11, 2007 at 10:14 am #
Comment #76926 by Billy T D on 6/10 at 7:36 pm
Billy,
Your comment has a message to our hysterical hecklers. They are still using those methods/tactics that you & I listed in our previous comments, a couple of days ago.
WE CLEARLY SEE THEIR DECEPTIVE WAYS/TACTICS.
- Character attack/lie, lie, lie…
- Attempt to change the topic when the truth/facts expose their true colors & their zionist propaganda.
- Sidetrack the issues.
- Attempt to plant doubt to the readers.
- Label comments/commenters as…Arabs, Islamists, Jew haters…etc…and hoping to discourage readers from reading our factual comments/information. In other words, attempt via deceptive methods/ways to blindfold & muffle ‘trudig’s’ readers from paying attention to our input/comments.
Notice that this zionist gang’s “PATTERN” has been consistent with what I have just described.
These fanatic zealots have an agenda to all readers. And that is to shield them from the TRUTH about Israel’s NAZI, Apartheid policies against the Palestinians. ALL BECAUSE THE PALESTINIANS ARE NOT JEWISH! They don’t meet Israel’s “RACIST” standards.
Notice that they have NO substance. Its ALL the same ole malarkey. Their main goals are just post zionist propaganda garbage, hoping to counter our information.
Ill-lie-mam & “stenchy/lefty=pesach” sound very similar. Its almost the same broken beat after beat…stenchy/lefty is lost in all this information. He can’t cope with his competition…who is perched & watching every one of his moves. Ephraim=lefty just keeps typing & posting whatever his helper(s) is/are giving him. That is his ONLY ROLE. He has NO choice in the matter
These guys have NO shame nor any self respect. They all got exposed & knocked down several times for their zionist propaganda.
They are probably celebrating that you have exited from this forum due to their ...SOS. They probably said that is one less nemesis that we have to deal with.
NORMAN FINKELSTEIN WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SAME ENERGY TO EXPOSE ZIONIST’S DECEPTIONS & SPEAKING OUT FOR THE OPPRESSED.
Report thisBy Charles Barton, June 11, 2007 at 10:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why did the Palestinians leave in 1947-48?
In 1948 all but one member of the Palestinian Arab High Committee left Jerusalem and fled to other Arab countries, Were they forced to do so by the Jews? No! The Jews of Jerusalem were besieged. The Arab population of Jerusalem was protected by the Arab Legion. No Palestinian has ever offered a plausible answer for why their leaders left the country in the middle of a war that their leaders wanted. The truth is that almost the entire Palestinian upper class left the country before the out break of fighting, and the Palestinian middle class had sent their wives and children away as well. As soon as the fighting broke out, the Palestinian middle class men sent their families away.
During the fighting, bands of armed men under no ones effective control swarmed through the Palestinian country side pillaging and looting. These bands, made up mainly of gunmen from other Arab states, expected to be paid from the plunder they won from Jews, but since the Jews were not easily plundered, they plundered Palestinian Arabs instead. It is HARDLY ANY WONDER THEN THAT MOST PALESTINIAN ARABS FLED THEIR HOMES WITHOUT EVER SEEING AN ARMED JEW.
The Palestinian story of forced exile is a myth designed to cover up Palestinian shame over their flight from their undefended homes.
Report thisPage 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >