![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Trading SecretsPosted on May 22, 2007By Amy Goodman The Democratic Party leadership is stabbing its base in the back with secret “free trade” deals made behind closed doors with the White House. Now congressional Democrats may be on the verge of a significant split. While Democratic leaders and President Bush do the hard sell on bipartisan immigration reform, they are now pushing secret, anti-worker, anti-environment trade agreements that will only exacerbate U.S. immigration problems. The contentious agreements are bilateral trade deals between the U.S. and Peru, Panama, Colombia and South Korea. The deals were announced in a bipartisan press conference May 10, with principal credit going to Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee (long dubbed by some as the “Ways to be Mean” Committee). According to Inside U.S. Trade, as noted by blogger David Sirota, House Democrats admit that the White House is drafting the legal language of the trade deals. Rick MacArthur, publisher of Harper’s Magazine and author of the book “The Selling of ‘Free Trade’: NAFTA, Washington, and the Subversion of American Democracy,” calls these agreements “a fundraising gambit by the House leadership.” He told me: “Rangel and [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi are saying, ‘Well, we’re gearing up for the 2008 election. We’ve got to raise a lot of money.’ They’re closer to the Clinton wing of the party, which is the pro-so-called-free-trade wing of the party, the pro-NAFTA, pro-permanent-normal-trade-relations-with-China part of the party. And this is a way of saying to the corporate community—Wall Street, Wal-Mart—that we’re open for business, we want to raise money from you.” In order to compete for campaign money, the logic goes, the Democrats have to cater to big corporate donors. MacArthur points out that the agreements with the four small countries are not key. The big money, he says, lies with China. This is where Hillary Clinton comes in. She served on the Wal-Mart board of directors for six years when her husband was the governor of Arkansas (where Wal-Mart is based). Wal-Mart, MacArthur says, “depends on dedicated factories in China, where you cannot form a labor union. Wildcat strikes are met with violence. You get your head busted or you get thrown in jail.” The corporate Democrats and their Republican allies are promising labor and environmental protections. But 13 years after NAFTA passed, with President Clinton orchestrating pork-barrel payouts to buy the vote, promised safeguards have proved unenforceable: Workers, especially in Mexico, earn low wages with little or no security, while companies crush union-organizing efforts and pollute with impunity. As jobs move to Mexico, China and other low-wage havens, the U.S. is the loser. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, knows it all too well: “We see that kind of job loss in the thousands ... devastates communities. It hurts the local business owner, the drugstore, the grocery store, the neighborhood restaurant. It hurts communities. It hurts schools. It hurts police forces. It hurts fire departments.” Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., also slammed the trade deals, saying it was as if “the foxes and wolves had reached a deal on guarding the henhouse.” He went on: “I wish I could lay the blame at the feet of our colleagues in the other party. But members of both parties have aided and abetted these flawed policies.” Feingold pointed out that the trade deals have not been endorsed by any union or environment groups, but they have been endorsed by three of the most powerful organizations representing corporate interests: the Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. If the Washington power brokers are betting on Americans not understanding or caring about arcane trade policy, they should recall the Battle of Seattle. In late 1999, when the World Trade Organization tried to meet in Seattle to impose global corporate trade policies, it was met by tens of thousands of protesters, from Teamsters to environmentalists, healthcare workers to students to farmworkers. The meetings were shut down. Compound this potential backlash with the millions of hardworking immigrants now staring down the barrel of another bipartisan agreement. These are the people who took to the streets in the millions last year. When the rules are rigged to allow money to move freely across borders, then people will follow. Falling wages south of the border, caused by “free trade,” drive people north—no matter how high the wall or how many detention facilities are built to contain them. Make no mistake about it—trade and immigration are linked. Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on 500 stations in North America. © 2007 Amy Goodman; distributed by King Features Syndicate Previous item: Worse Than Watergate, Part II Next item: Chris Hedges: I Don't Believe in Atheists Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Dawn, May 27, 2007 at 1:29 am #
The reason that Democrats are making the same mistake that Republicans have made is because the system is set up that way. And they have no faith in Progressives. They don’t need to take those corporate dollars. Congress has already sold America down the river. Are we going to let 1000 people in Washington who want to retire with a golden parachute ruin our country forever with these so called free trade agreements?
Amy Goodman is right. You can’t talk about immigration reform without talking about getting rid of NAFTA and CAFTA. Those agreements devastated Mexico and so the people come north because they are starving. Those free trade laws are genocidal. We need to stop pretending that globalization is a pretty word. You can substitute the word slavery for guest worker progam. That is what it is.
We could consider a boycott of Coca-Cola and Pepsi products. They move into an undeveloped area and devastate its inhabitants and its environment. They deplete the clean water and leave a toxic sludge in its place which ends up sickening and killing the people around the Pepsi factories. Also since there is no water to drink and they are too poor to buy milk, the poor children drink Pepsi for breakfast. Their teeth rot and their immune systems break down and then they die. Globalization? Or genocide?
We need to make our campaign’s publicly financed. Equal media time should be allotted for free for national elections. Our elected officials should get out of the business of fundraising and into the business of upholding our unique Constitution with all of its protections and supports for the general welfare of all people in our country.
It is a travesty that congressmen are tempted to work against the best interests of the American people just to raise money to stay in office. Let’s end this charade now. People like Russ Feingold and Dennis Kucinich know what to do. They speak truth to power on a regular basis. Let’s demand legislation for public financing of campaigns.
Report thisBy ardee, May 25, 2007 at 4:41 am #
tiny minds and tiny url’s....
Once, just once would you comment on the actual documentsigned by the pResident? You seem to have no trouble with the suspension of our liberty and the “temporary” enhancing of the status of the most incompetent and corrupt administration in American history being enacted at the sole discretion of a man I wouldnt trust to mow my lawn.
Democracy only works when people engage on the issues and stop spouting knee jerk party line pollyanna nonesense.
Report thisBy fazzaz31, May 24, 2007 at 11:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
For those of you worried about “continuity of government”:
Do some research before you get all paranoid. Start here: http://tinyurl.com/2cdofx
then go here: http://tinyurl.com/2zjwk7
and here: http://tinyurl.com/2cv25e
and finally, here: http://tinyurl.com/zhcfn
If after reading ALL of the above you want to continue to wave your hands and claim a conspiracy, well, be my guest.
Personally, I’d be pissed if the feebs didn’t have a backup plan for a national emergency.
Report thisBy ardee, May 24, 2007 at 5:30 pm #
#72224 by fazzaz31 on 5/24 at 1:05 am
(Unregistered commenter)
Uh, I hate to break it to you all, but that White House directive that Tony B. and others have been worrying about is just the latest update of civil defense plans that have been around in one form or another since 1916.
Remember CONELRAD, Civil Defense, fallout shelters, line of presidential succession, and “duck and cover”? Same stuff, just a new name.
-----------------------------
Rose colored glasses much?
I fail to see how CONELRAD, fallout shelters, hiding under desks, or the line of succession gave any President almost dictatorial powers in an emergency of his own declaring...do you?
Report thisBy cann4ing, May 24, 2007 at 5:21 pm #
re comment #72415 by Terry Dougherty. Excellent points but let me add something to this question of “electability.” Electability is a device by which the conglomerated media divert attention from those candidates who seek to speak truth to power and who truly represent the vast majority of the American electorate, the middle and working classes. The corporate media has a vested interest not only in who we elect but how we elect. They intentionally seek to marginalize a candidate like Dennis Kucinich by failing, whenever possible, to even mention his name.
This does not mean that they will provide meaningful coverage to even the so-called “leading” candidates--that is the candidates who are acceptable to the corporatocracy, especially its military-industrial complex. They will talk about money. They will talk about poll numbers. Occasionally they will talk about something inane, like the price of a candidate’s haircut. When they do that, they don’t have to talk about substance.
That forces candidates to raise enormous sums to feed the conglomerated media noise machine, buying up the 30 second spot ads that, like all corporate advertising, is designed to deceive. Since those ads entail enormous expense, only those candidates who have sold-out to the corporatocracy can afford the price. Another word for “electable” candidates is “packaged.”
But the real power truly lies with We the People. All we have to do is stop playing the role of passive consumers and take on the responsibility of active citizenship. Stop watching the propaganda network--pretty much the entirety of the corporate-owned media and not simply Fox News. Through alternative media, especially Democracy Now, and through the net, the information is readily available. We the People, as responsible citizens in a democracy, have a civic duty to seek out detailed information about where candidates stand on issues that truly matter. We have a duty to encourage other citizens to act responsibly by encouraging them to go to the same sites, Kucinich.us in particular.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, May 24, 2007 at 5:00 pm #
Outsourcing is giving our competitors the rope to hang us by.
This is a prime example of why national office term limits and campaign finance reform are needed.
Law would have to enacted, grass roots style, at the state level in all 50 states as no self respecting lobbiest funded politician would go for it.
As long as congrssional representatives and senators take special interest money laws will be manipulated.
I would like to see some of these Americans whose jobs was outsourced by NAFTA run for office.
Report thisBy ctbrandon, May 24, 2007 at 2:48 pm #
Sam:
I see your pain in how people feel when they admit that our entire basis for being in Iraq is built on lies. Think about this, if we are willing to allow that many soliders and iraqis to die for oil, wouldnt it be just as easy to let a few thousand Americans die in the 9-11 tragedy? And doesnt it seem convienent that this act allowed Bush to push through his entire agenda of stripping rights from Americans and bringing more power to the elite?
We aren’t going to get anywhere until we get someone like Kucinich, Gravel, or Paul in the Whitehouse.
Brando
Report thishttp://www.actforyourself.org
By Jon Gold, May 24, 2007 at 2:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Lonna, Lonna, Lonna:
That “debate” on 9/11 was a joke.
Sincerely,
Report thisJon
By Gabir, May 24, 2007 at 2:13 pm #
I would suggest that these two parties which rule our nation should merge under one “tent” and create a new party name to identify themselves . Some possibilities come to mind .
1)Enemies of the Republic Party
2)Spineless Murderers Party
3)Subsidiaries of Exxon - Mobil Party
4)Cheap Labor Party
5)Job Exporters Party
6)Fox News Party
7)Body Baggers Party
8)Church of Latter-Day Lobbyists Party
9)United in Fraud Party
10)Photo-Op Party
11)Agree to Disagree Party
12)Mudslingers Party
13)Where’s the Pork ? Party
14)Back Room Party
15)Enemies of America Party
16)Drunk on Money Party
17)Insensitivity Party
18)Mostly White Guys Party
19)(NRA)No Real Action Party
20)Look the Other Way Party
Maybe other people could offer their suggestions to create their own list of possibilities or add to mine .
Report thisBy Terry Dougherty, May 24, 2007 at 1:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Kudos to Ernest Canning who has pointed out that the only candidate for the Presidency who has opposed the war from the beginning (rightly connecting it to our attempt to steal Iraqi oil) is Dennis Kucinich. Kucinich is also the only candidate to propose a single payer/single plan universal health care system that would eliminate the insurance gangsters from the system. He also proposes an annual reduction of dod spending by 15% per year--redirecting that amount to finance education from early childhood through college for every American. He would get us out of NAFTA and the WTO.
His detractors argue--"His ideas are good, but he’s not electable.” Why not? Because he doesn’t have a nice tan and easy southern drawl like Edwards? Because he isn’t tall or an ex-football player (James Madison was only 5’4")? Because he isn’t ‘charismatic’ like Clinton or Obama? These are not valid reasons. This is not about who becomes king of the prom. This is about restoring our country to the ideals of a government of the people, by the people and for the people, and away from the kleptocrats and corporatists (aka fascists) who are destroying America for profit. Come on, America--grow up!
Report thisBy Lonna Gooden VanHorn, May 24, 2007 at 3:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
for Jon Gold,
I guarantee you, Amy reported on all of this before the war on her news program, Democracy Now. It is carried on FSTV, channel 9415 if you have DISH and also on 9410 World Link. You can also get audio and transcripts of the show for the past several years off the net at the Democracy Now website.
FSTV and World Link also ran specials right along prior to the invasion featuring peple like Scott Ritter and a priest from Iraq, both of whom said the premise for the invasion was lies. Both also decried what would happen to Iraq if we went in. Amy had guests on her show who were antiwar. The MSM gave them almost no air time, but she did.
She also has carried a debate on 911 on her show.
I have DISH for the educational channels. Direct TV also carries Amy and Democracy Now on Channel 375 (I believe, I could be wrong on the channel) but it does not carry FSTV, which is why I continue to use DISH.
I thought I died and went to heaven when I found those channels. 56 minutes of news with only 4 one minute station breaks and no commercials. In depth interviews with people like Seymour Hersch, Scott Ritter, Gore Vidal, Maxine Waters, etc.
Report thisBy Beau Alford, May 24, 2007 at 2:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
F. D. R. was the last of the Great American Presidents. So why don’t you “ Pilgrims “, go back to Europe and take your “ ROOT “ brothers with you. So that we Native Americans can get things right with mother earth.
Report thisYou elect trash to your public offices, then want to cry about it. All they have to say is “ I got a better plan “, do they ever tell you what they are offering ???
Wake up armpits of America, that’s not Roses you are smelling LIKE !!!!!
You need to TERMINATE your trash that you have placed in public offices, starting with the Demorcrats, the biggest bunch of crooks, then working your way down the ladder, by pieceful means.
By SamSnedegar, May 24, 2007 at 2:26 am #
mea culpa?
two things, Brandon: the media never reported this, and he didn’t start on oil until his 2004 run, when we had been in Iraq for a year already.
I am gratified however and hopeful because the PEOPLE shouted “OIL” in his speech (assuming that this wasn’t added later), and I thank you for the information, doubly because the mainstream media is so involved in the propaganda that they never reported Charlie Rangel’s statement on *ucker Snarlson’s show either.
Who knows how many people mention oil when the media won’t report it?
The problem with talking about oil is that as soon as you acknowledge that but for oil no American boot would ever have touched the sands of Iraq, you then are faced with the responsibility of the American people for the coveting, lying, murdering, and stealing by the Bushitter gang of thugs, TWICE (sort of) elected by them.
Report thisBy fazzaz31, May 24, 2007 at 1:05 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Uh, I hate to break it to you all, but that White House directive that Tony B. and others have been worrying about is just the latest update of civil defense plans that have been around in one form or another since 1916.
Remember CONELRAD, Civil Defense, fallout shelters, line of presidential succession, and “duck and cover”? Same stuff, just a new name.
For a laugh, see here: http://tinyurl.com/3xl7md
Report thisBy Jon Gold, May 23, 2007 at 7:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hi Amy,
Please show me where the media, of which you’re apart of, covered any of the following:
1. In August 2006, the families that fought for the creation of the 9/11 Commission, that attended every hearing, that worked with the Commission Staff, that provided 1000’s of well researched questions (70% of which were not answered), declared that very Commission, “derelict in its duties”, and questioned the “entire veracity” of the 9/11 Report.
2. A documentary endorsed by those same family members was released on 9/5/2006 entitled, “9/11: Press For Truth” that calls into question the entire 9/11 Report.
3. On September 11th, 2006, representatives of a good portion of family members called for an entirely new investigation at the National Press Club in Washington D.C.
4. In October 2006, the families that fought for the creation of the 9/11 Commission, that attended every hearing, that worked with the Commission Staff, that provided 1000’s of well researched questions (70% of which were not answered), released a petition which now has 15,000+ signatures, and calls for the declassification of pertinent 9/11 related information.
5. On April 11th, 2007, family members Bob Mcilvaine and Bill Doyle filed a petition against NIST seeking corrections of inaccurate factual statements and analysis in NIST’s reports on the destruction of the Twin Towers.
Thank you,
Jon Gold
Report thisBy ardee, May 23, 2007 at 4:44 pm #
What to do, what to do......
It has taken a rather long time for this nation to arrive at this sorry state of affairs and the solution to this mess will not be found in shortcuts, hyperbole or any single political candidate or party.
I am frankly unsurprised by the culpability and cowardice of the Democratic Party who, for six rather longish years, prattled about being powerless while in the majority and now prattle about being powerless because they are not in a large enough majority. The real truth is that they obey the same master as does the GOP, money. We are in a crisis of leadership in this nation, we aint got any. None of our elected officials, nor any seeking to be elected care one whit about democracy, justice, fairness or the rights of the poor, the disenfranchised,seniors, children, or the wishes of the electorate apparently!
We do not have to look further than our mirrors to place the blame for this , I have seen the enemy and it is us. Wasnt it Plato who noted that those who are too intelligent to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are not? We have become a nation addicited to instant gratification. We mortage our futures for cheap plastic crap and happily bear the enormous credit card debt that makes us submissive and scared to rock the boat. We vote for those who mouth catch phrases and poll oriented buzz words and who have absolutely no intention of ever keeping a single one of those promises.
So what to do, what to do....well I know not what course others may take but as for me I devote my energies and efforts into a party that has pledged to accept not one thin dime from corportate interests, whose platform is a marvel of liberalism, see for yourself:
http://www.gp.org/
I do understand that the system is rigged against third party politics but I also note that the Greens are gaining election victories in greater numbers each cycle.In ‘06 they ran 374 candidates in 38 states for 66 types of offices and gained 65 victories. I also note that this is simply too little and too much work for a goal that may still be a decade in the future for some folks at any rate. So if you have a better idea go for it, the real key is to do something, anything.
Report thisBy cann4ing, May 23, 2007 at 4:25 pm #
re comment #72052 by Lee. While Gravel has been outspoken in opposing the military-industrial complex and the war in Iraq, unlike Kucinich, he has not suggested repealing NAFTA and the WTO and returning to bilateral trade agreements. Gravel’s voucher solution to healthcare is a variation of the health insurer subsidies proposed by Clinton, Obama and Edwards. Only Kucinich proposes to bring this nation in line with the healthcare systems of every other industrialized nation--a single-payer system that eliminates the unnecessary for-profit healthcare insurer middle man--a middle man responsble for 31% of the cost of healthcare. Gravel proposes direct democracy, but since that would entail a Constitutional amendment it is doubtful it could be accomplished even during a two-term Gravel presidency. That makes his proposal nothing more than a campaign gimmick. Sorry, Lee, while I like Gravel, Kucinich is superior across the board.
Report thisBy BobZ, May 23, 2007 at 3:30 pm #
This is what worries me if Clinton is elected President. Bill was very pro-NAFTA and he and GHWBush went around the country saying how great it was going to be. Well it hasn’t. And there have been no hearings about the failure of NAFTA to either help Mexico (which it was supposed to do) or help American workers (which it was supposed to do). It has helped multi-national corporations move their operations to Mexico which hurts our trade deficit, hurts American workers, and doesn’t even have the side benefit of helping American consumers. The wealth created goes to the already wealthy. NAFTA was written by corporate lobbyists just like the Medicare drug bill was written by Drug company lobbyists. We need to elect Democrats who aren’t “Dino’s” (Democrats in Name Only). What is amazing is that the media is not even asking candidate views about free trade or NAFTA. That are getting a free pass. Al Gore is rightly critical of the media for giving Bush a “free pass”, but even Mr. Gore was in favor of NAFTA.
Report thisBy Lee, May 23, 2007 at 3:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
You say you want a revolution. Well, we’d all love to see the plan.
Mike Gravel as a plan.
National Initiative for Democracy:
Empower Americans by giving us the mechanism––The National Ballot Initiative––to vote directly on issues which affect our daily lives. This power is similar to the initiatives used by citizens in 24 states and over 200 communities.
http://www.gravel2008.us/
The problem with supporting the Democrats is that there is only a façade of a difference between them and the Republicans. The problem with supporting third parties is that it ensures the Republicans win by splitting up would be Democratic votes.
If we want a revolution, we must first change our arcane voting system of winner take all. Instant runoff voting has the potential to make a third party ticket viable. Without instant runoff voting in place we will simply keep chasing our trail to the delight of both Republicans and Democrats.
http://www.instantrunoff.com/
The winner take all elections system is a rigged game that produces an extremely apathetic voting and nonvoting public.
It’s kind of silly to read that the Democrats are cutting deals with the Republicans for money, as if this were news. Neither the Democrats or the Republicans give a damn about America or the American people. Both parties are interested only in hanging on to power. So talking about it as if it’s surprising is thoroughly asinine. Ralph Nader pointed out that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the parties many years ago. Since then that dime has become much thinner.
Report thisBy don knutsen, May 23, 2007 at 2:55 pm #
The media again is dancing to Karl Rove’s fiddle. All the major media outlets rush out to portray the democrats as weak, folding under the sheer weight of the mighty republican juggernaut. This is no doubt all orchestrated to paint the dem.s as weak knee’d liberals who can’t be trusted with the reins of power.Unable to reach a decision and stick to it, not having the guts it takes to be a war mongering cowboy like dubya. Manipulating the discussion is what Karl Rove is best at. With the help of such a complacent media it becomes possible. Ofcourse an integral part of that is keeping the truth as far away as possible from the voters as long as possible. When that begins to fail, its time to start disqualifying voters, all the while rattling pans about supposed voter fraud from the democratic ( read enemy )ticket. What Karl apparently didn’t factor in was that there were still some republican appointed federal attorneys who took their oath seriously, so they had to go. Bush’s Mall lawyer, the AG, was up to the task, any task , to make his master happy.
Report thisBy TruthSeeker, May 23, 2007 at 2:41 pm #
Yeah Amy, meanwhile you are stabbing your viewers and listeners and fans in the back by failing to address 9/11 Truth, a clear inside job if ever there was one.
What are you, a left gatekeeper? Stop betraying us, Amy, and do your job, expose the lies, just as you do for other stories.
Continue to hide the truth like the Dems, Amy. We are on to you.
Report thisBy don knutsen, May 23, 2007 at 11:16 am #
If our elected representitives don’t vote the way we want, what should we do ? You vote them out of office. Thats how our democracy is supposed to work. We’ve gone so long now, not even paying attention as to how they are voting, or even whether they are showing up to vote at at all, I think too many have forgotten that they get away with it because we let them get away with it. How about we start making the system work again. A great chance to start turning things around is being lost because the present democratic leadership in the congress are too timid to do what needs doing. WriteSpeaker Pelosi and Senator Reid, let them know your feelings, make your views known and make sure they realize that your vote for them hinges on their representing you. That goes for the War, Taxes, Free Trade agreements and everything else they hold the purse strings ( our money ) on. I think both of these individuals need replacing with people who are more willing and able to confront this maniacal administration.
Report thisBy ctbrandon, May 23, 2007 at 10:36 am #
may want to do a bit more research before you writeoff Kucinich, Sam. He’s been saying “oil” since day one. I believe he is the only candidate running who voted against the war.
If you need proof of his stance, watch the main video at
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=Kucinich2008
Two minutes in you’ll be happy to hear his very passionate stance on this issue. Oh and BTW, hes not even my candidate, just wanted to make sure the facts were reported.
Brandon
Report thishttp://www.actforyourself.org
By SamSnedegar, May 23, 2007 at 9:54 am #
I listened to Kucinich throughout the debate and didn’t hear the word oil. I also heard Charlie Rangel say clearly that the US went to Iraq for oil. That’s two out of 435, one I heard, the other I didn’t hear. So sorry I don’t listen to Kucinich any more than I listen to Inhofe or Brownback or any other fool.
Report thisBy Bill Blackolive, May 23, 2007 at 8:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Amie Goodman, in the meantime one Alan Miller has out since September an expanding website: patriotsquestion911.com/media, which can be a book, already some hundreds of names and photos of known people who declare there is a coverup of 911 by our government. There is Kucinich, Ron Paul, probably soon Gravel and Ralph Nader...I think at this point you will lose no ground by getting into Miller’s book....Then, everything changes...our nation is jerked rudely awake....
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, May 23, 2007 at 8:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
‘We The People’ have been removed from this government’s Constitution. Time to disinvest in Kleptocracy/Oligarchy/NeoCorporatism and move avidly toward other forms of Democracy. Or does the USA hold enough institutional momentum that it would better function on solemn GovernmentLite?
Another example of his ‘I never do as I say...’
President’s Statement on Kleptocracy
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/200608 10.html
For too long, the culture of corruption has undercut development and good governance and bred criminality and mistrust around the world. High-level corruption by senior government officials, or kleptocracy, is a grave and corrosive abuse of power and represents the most invidious type of public corruption. It threatens our national interest and violates our values. It impedes our efforts to promote freedom and democracy, end poverty, and combat international crime and terrorism. Kleptocracy is an obstacle to democratic progress, undermines faith in government institutions, and steals prosperity from the people. Promoting transparent, accountable governance is a critical component of our freedom agenda.
At this year’s G-8 meeting in St Petersburg, my colleagues joined me in calling for strengthened international efforts to deny kleptocrats access to our financial systems and safe haven in our countries; stronger efforts to combat fraud, corruption, and misuse of public resources; and increased capacity internationally to prevent opportunities for high-level public corruption. Today, I am announcing a new element in my Administration’s plan to fight kleptocracy, The National Strategy to Internationalize Efforts against Kleptocracy, which sets forth a framework to deter, prevent, and address high-level, public corruption. It identifies critical tools to detect and prosecute corrupt officials around the world, so that the promise of economic assistance and growth reaches the people.
Our objective is to defeat high-level public corruption in all its forms and to deny corrupt officials access to the international financial system as a means of defrauding their people and hiding their ill-gotten gains. Given the nature of our open, accessible international financial system, our success in fighting kleptocracy will depend upon the participation and accountability of our partner nations, the international financial community, and regional and multilateral development institutions. Together, we can confront kleptocracy and help create the conditions necessary for people everywhere to enjoy the full benefits of honest, just, and accountable governance.
(Mea Culpa, bruthas and sistas)
Report thisBy Hank Van den Berg, May 23, 2007 at 7:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is just one way in which the Democratic leadership is stabbing the base in the back. Despite all the talk about withdrawing from Iraq, we learn today that the Navy now has two carriers in the region in a blatant daytime show of sabre rattling against Iran, troop levels in Iraq have been quietly slated to approach 200,000 by the end of the year, Democrats openly talk about maintaining a presence (continue to operate the huge bases) in Iraq, and now they give Bush every penny he wants to continue his wars. And we should worry about these little trade agreements?
Report thisBy tomack, May 23, 2007 at 7:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Business as usual.
It remains up to us--all of us--to effect any real change. If it didn’t work out to our satisfaction this past election, then let’s make it work a little better on the next. And if needed, the next…
That is why I have raised my children well--this is a long haul job.
Report thisBy ctbrandon, May 23, 2007 at 7:11 am #
Clear proof once again that the elite from both sides of our parties are not working for us. They only work for themselves. Here is to hoping the citizens of this nation realize what so many here already have. If we all take action, we can get candidates like Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, and Ron Paul so much support that both parties have no choice but to give them the nominations! Then we can have something we haven’t had in the country in our generation, a REAL election!
Brandon
Report thishttp://www.actforyourself.org
By cann4ing, May 23, 2007 at 6:56 am #
SamSnedegar asks us to name one member of Congress who mentions the word “oil” and Iraq in the same paragraph. Answer: Dennis Kucinich, in nearly every speech about the war he has made.
Report thisBy Brando, May 23, 2007 at 6:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
So called Democrats and Republicans working together to destroy our way of life, all for money and power.
This is exactly the type of agenda forced down the throats of Americans, simply because we feel we are unable to do anything to stop it. I am proud to be part of a group that is determined to once again make this a nation “of the people, for the people, by the people”. Our goal is simple, to win nominations for real candidates from both parties, and give America an actual CHOICE in 2008.
So many of us feel this way, but we feel that we are helpess to stop it. Afterall “what is one person going to fix?” But we have already made progress. Working together, we shut down a petition in Michigan that was designed to ban Ron Paul from the Republican Debate.
If you would like to be part of this movement, please stop by our site. Together we can make a change.
Brando
Report thishttp://www.actforyourself.org
By Lefty, May 23, 2007 at 6:18 am #
The 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution must mandate a 1st Amendment style “wall of separation” between commerce and state, criminalize ALL political contributions, including anything of value of any nature whatsoever, as bribery, and mandate public financing of all elections.
This is the only way to pry the corrupt, vulturous grip that the corporate fascists such as Exxon/Mobil/Shell, General Electric, Pfizer, Bayer, Dow, Dupont, AT&T;, Comcast, State Farm, Allstate, Citibank, et al., have on our federal, state and local governments.
Report thisBy Sang Ze, May 23, 2007 at 5:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Democrats have amply demonstrated that they are less capable of leadership than the Republican yahoos running the country. We no longer have a choice. We must move in a totally new direction. People often claim that a third party will only damage those in the current major parties actively seeking change. Too bad. They can change their affiliation, too. We need a new party, a serious alternative to the self-serving liars now in office. Unless we make a real effort to change it, and do it now, we will be stuck with this corrupt system forever.
Report thisBy Verne Arnold, May 23, 2007 at 4:58 am #
I’m sorry...just one more thought..Oh gee, you mean the dems are duplicitous too? Oh mercy...I’m shocked beyond all reason!
Kucinich, Paul, Gravel!!!!!! Hello????!!!!
Report thisBy Verne Arnold, May 23, 2007 at 4:47 am #
So...whats the big surprise? Did anybody really expect a revolution from the politicians?
Revolutions only come from the people, not politicians!
This lot is running scared or uninformed or both; it matters not...don’t hold your breath!
Report thisBy SamSnedegar, May 23, 2007 at 3:13 am #
As Tony B noted, the Congress is nugatory and does as the Executive tells it to do, just like in Cuba!
Democracy in the USA died in December of 2000 when the Supremely Corrupt Court installed the Bushitter regime illegally and by its action joined the Executive to nullify the Legislative.
Congress supposedly has the Constitutional power to declare war, and surely has the power to declare one over and withdraw funding from a runaway Executive which wants to keep a war going against the best interests of the people.
We are a dictatorship as much as Pakistan, only we are not honest about it like they. Do however please note that so far the Bushitter gang of thugs has yet to tell the unvarnished truth about any issue, so you cannot expect them to begin any time soon.
If you think there is honesty in the Democratic Congress, please tell me the last time you heard ONE stinking member of that toothless herd of sheep mention the word “oil” and Iraq in the same PARAGRAPH, let alone in the same sentence. Indeed, they hardly ever mention the word “oil” at all, just like the media types herabouts, and when they do, it has no connection to Iraq or our reason for going over there and killing and stealing the coveted oil over which we lied ourselves into a war.
Coveting, lying, killing, stealing; no wonder they don’t want to talk about it.
Report thisBy Michael Haft, May 22, 2007 at 10:44 pm #
Ms. Goodman,
I very much agree with the topic of your article, that being the idea that democratic representatives are going behind their constituents back to make free trade deals. However I have problems with the other claims you make, but do not back up. Mainly that free trade deals are anti-worker and create immigration problems.
The United States is Falling behind in many ways, protectionist measures will only hinder not help the American people. That is not to say that I am anti-worker, there is a balance that must be achieved between workers rights and what is best for the economy as a whole. A program which would help solve this issue is to retrain those workers who are affected by jobs moving overseas. An interesting article is http://www.foreignaffairs.org
/20060301faessay85209/alan-s-blinder/offshoring-the-next-in dustrial-revolution.html
Your point about falling wages in countries we trade with, is simply untrue. I do not mean to assault your journalism. It is just not backed up by facts or basic economic theory. Wages in China have been and will continue to rise. When the demand for jobs outstrips supply wages go up
Report thishttp://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?re s=F30914F93F540C738FDDAF0894DE404482
By Anthony Martin Dambrosi, May 22, 2007 at 10:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Yeah it’s really mind numbing to see them cave in on setting a date certain as well as the trade deal. The Captain of the Titanic realized help could be there in 4 hours but his ship will sink in 2. I wonder if the ship of state has listed too far right to be pulled back from the brink of capsizing. I once thought the pain had to reach a point of critical mass as in the Great Depression; when middle class kids risked being cannon fodder for the other bungled unwinnable war as the Draft Lottery went into effect. Now enough people may be feeling pain we no longer have a Free Press, no check, no balance, no Habeus and free speech as well as other rights are being sold off i.e., privatized. The latest revelations in the Senate on the illegal wiretapping should put impeachment back on table.
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, May 22, 2007 at 10:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
These back door trade deals are just another indication to those who thought the democratics were the second coming to get a grip on reality.It is all about raising money.The democrats do not want to impeach George Bush they want to get his donor lists.Until there is some type of public financing for federal campaigns it will always be about money.In the long run for the middle class it is cheaper to publicly finance these campaigns and not have the billions of dollars that are given away to pay back those large donors.If you think wealthy people and corporations do not give a 1000 to get 10000 back you are living in a dreamworld.
Report thisBy G. Anderson, May 22, 2007 at 8:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Whose going to buy American products when the American middle class is gone?
Whose going to pay enough taxes to a government that has a huge military budget, when the middle class is gone?
Maybe that’s what it’s going to take, a nice fat depression worse than the last one, before our leaders and our corporations realize that American’s aren’t a “bottom-less well”, to take from decade after decade, with no consequence…
This is why the Democratic party, doesn’t do much about Republican malfeasance, because their alike.
The solution is obvious to everyone, shift the tax burden from the middle class, back to the corporations, tax the products that the corporations bring into this country, limit technical work visa’s, require CEO’s to be licensed and meet strict ethical guideliness as a part of their licensing process..
or better yet, support a third party, because there’s no difference between the Republican party and the Democratic party.
Free trade has gutted this country, and it’s making American’s desperate like never before…
Report thisBy cann4ing, May 22, 2007 at 7:54 pm #
I would encourage all Truthdiggers to read Jeff Faux, “The Global Class War.” This is simply a continuation of the betrayal of American labor and the base of the Democratic Party that occurred when President Clinton joined with Reagan/Bush I in fast-tracking NAFTA and the WTO--devices which permitted the outsourcing of America’s manufacturing base as the remnant of American labor was increasingly Wal-Mart-ized.
If America’s middle class wants to survive, it must wake up and right soon! All of the so-called “leading” or “electable” candidates--Obama, Clinton & Edwards--are corporatists who, like Pelosi, will sell out the middle and working classes for the almighty corporate campaign dollars. The “only” candidate advocating a repeal of NAFTA and the WTO is Dennis Kucinich. Encourage everyone you know to watch or listen to Democracy Now, then direct them to Kucinich.us.
Report thisBy Leefeller, May 22, 2007 at 7:22 pm #
Everyone, all posters out there in TruthDig Land,
Tony B. is calling attention to something sponsored by the White House which is an attempt to grab power from the other two branches of our government. I am not a Constitutional expert, far from it, but this looks like Bush’s attempt to grab power and maybe null any impeachment.
Is Congress doing anything or is the White house calling the shots, who is in control? We know how the White House feels about the people.
Report thisBy DennisD, May 22, 2007 at 7:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Let me know when our Congress hasn’t sold out to the highest bidder, that would be real news. This story is beyond redundant.
Report thisWe’re all witnesses to the destruction of the American way of life - courtesy of our own government. When are we, by the tens of millions going to say, we’re mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. The founders of this country must be spinning in their graves watching what we the people have allowed to happen with not even a whimper.
By Jim Goodson, May 22, 2007 at 6:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Prosties in Congress are jumping to the tunes played by the Corporate Pimps again. This Bill Of Goods called Immagration Reform or Amnesty Reform sells out every American and surrenders our sovereign heritage to the highest bidder. Government as we used to know in the past cannot and will not enforce the Laws our forefathers fought and died for.Makes you wonder who our enemy really is?.P.S. Dummies, Bush is sending your children to war. Now the Dems are sending your grand children to war.
Report thisBy Jim Goodson, May 22, 2007 at 6:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Prosties in Congress are jumping to the tunes played by the Corporate Pimps again. This Bill Of Goods called Immagration Reform or Amnesty Reform sells out every American and surrenders our sovereign heritage to the highest bidder. Government as we used to know in the past cannot and will not enforce the Laws our forefathers fought and died for.Makes you wonder who our enemy reall is?.
Report thisBy Fools on the Hill, May 22, 2007 at 6:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This isn’t the leadership Pelosi promised.
Report thisBy Tony B., May 22, 2007 at 4:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Seems to look that way. All dissent from the Democratic party appears symbolic at best.
BTW why no metion of “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51” and “Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.” anywhere. Bush has basically signed his way into a potential dictatorship. The writ is vague and frightening! No word from the Dems, the press, anyone…
Directive can be found @:
Report thishttp://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/200705 09-12.html
By don knutsen, May 22, 2007 at 4:39 pm #
Thank goodness for Russ Feingold....I was dissapointed he didn’t decide to throw his hat in the ring for 2008. He certainly has exhibited one of the very few backbones in the senate. He actually appears to know why he is there...as opposed to Nancy P. , who seems more interested in playing a role as the first women in the number three position then in fixing things. The first edict outa her mouth was that impeachment was off the table. She is backass-wards, that should be the first order of buisness.
Report thisBy Leefeller, May 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm #
Some of us cynics out here have been screaming that Congress has been busy selling their soles to the highest bidders. Not really happy about it, and hope Congress proves me wrong.
Report this