![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Terrorized by ‘War on Terror’Posted on Mar 27, 2007The “war on terror” has created a culture of fear in America. The Bush administration’s elevation of these three words into a national mantra since the horrific events of 9/11 has had a pernicious impact on American democracy, on America’s psyche and on U.S. standing in the world. Using this phrase has actually undermined our ability to effectively confront the real challenges we face from fanatics who may use terrorism against us. The damage these three words have done—a classic self-inflicted wound—is infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks when they were plotting against us in distant Afghan caves. The phrase itself is meaningless. It defines neither a geographic context nor our presumed enemies. Terrorism is not an enemy but a technique of warfare—political intimidation through the killing of unarmed noncombatants. But the little secret here may be that the vagueness of the phrase was deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant reference to a “war on terror” did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue. The war of choice in Iraq could never have gained the congressional support it got without the psychological linkage between the shock of 9/11 and the postulated existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Support for President Bush in the 2004 elections was also mobilized in part by the notion that “a nation at war” does not change its commander in chief in midstream. The sense of a pervasive but otherwise imprecise danger was thus channeled in a politically expedient direction by the mobilizing appeal of being “at war.” To justify the “war on terror,” the administration has lately crafted a false historical narrative that could even become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By claiming that its war is similar to earlier U.S. struggles against Nazism and then Stalinism (while ignoring the fact that both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were first-rate military powers, a status al-Qaida neither has nor can achieve), the administration could be preparing the case for war with Iran. Such war would then plunge America into a protracted conflict spanning Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and perhaps also Pakistan. The culture of fear is like a genie that has been let out of its bottle. It acquires a life of its own—and can become demoralizing. America today is not the self-confident and determined nation that responded to Pearl Harbor; nor is it the America that heard from its leader, at another moment of crisis, the powerful words “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”; nor is it the calm America that waged the Cold War with quiet persistence despite the knowledge that a real war could be initiated abruptly within minutes and prompt the death of 100 million Americans within just a few hours. We are now divided, uncertain and potentially very susceptible to panic in the event of another terrorist act in the United States itself. That is the result of five years of almost continuous national brainwashing on the subject of terror, quite unlike the more muted reactions of several other nations (Britain, Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan, to mention just a few) that also have suffered painful terrorist acts. In his latest justification for his war in Iraq, President Bush even claims absurdly that he has to continue waging it lest al-Qaida cross the Atlantic to launch a war of terror here in the United States. Such fear-mongering, reinforced by security entrepreneurs, the mass media and the entertainment industry, generates its own momentum. The terror entrepreneurs, usually described as experts on terrorism, are necessarily engaged in competition to justify their existence. Hence their task is to convince the public that it faces new threats. That puts a premium on the presentation of credible scenarios of ever-more-horrifying acts of violence, sometimes even with blueprints for their implementation. That America has become insecure and more paranoid is hardly debatable. A recent study reported that in 2003, Congress identified 160 sites as potentially important national targets for would-be terrorists. With lobbyists weighing in, by the end of that year the list had grown to 1,849; by the end of 2004, to 28,360; by 2005, to 77,769. The national database of possible targets now has some 300,000 items in it, including the Sears Tower in Chicago and an Illinois apple and pork festival. Just last week, here in Washington, on my way to visit a journalistic office, I had to pass through one of the absurd “security checks” that have proliferated in almost all the privately owned office buildings in this capital—and in New York City. A uniformed guard required me to fill out a form, show an ID and in this case explain in writing the purpose of my visit. Would a visiting terrorist indicate in writing that the purpose is “to blow up the building”? Would the guard be able to arrest such a self-confessing, would-be suicide bomber? To make matters more absurd, large department stores, with their crowds of shoppers, do not have any comparable procedures. Nor do concert halls or movie theaters. Yet such “security” procedures have become routine, wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and further contributing to a siege mentality. Government at every level has stimulated the paranoia. Consider, for example, the electronic billboards over interstate highways urging motorists to “Report Suspicious Activity” (drivers in turbans?). Some mass media have made their own contribution. The cable channels and some print media have found that horror scenarios attract audiences, while terror “experts” as “consultants” provide authenticity for the apocalyptic visions fed to the American public. Hence the proliferation of programs with bearded “terrorists” as the central villains. Their general effect is to reinforce the sense of the unknown but lurking danger that is said to increasingly threaten the lives of all Americans. The entertainment industry has also jumped into the act. Hence the TV serials and films in which the evil characters have recognizable Arab features, sometimes highlighted by religious gestures, that exploit public anxiety and stimulate Islamophobia. Arab facial stereotypes, particularly in newspaper cartoons, have at times been rendered in a manner sadly reminiscent of the Nazi anti-Semitic campaigns. Lately, even some college student organizations have become involved in such propagation, apparently oblivious to the menacing connection between the stimulation of racial and religious hatreds and the unleashing of the unprecedented crimes of the Holocaust. The atmosphere generated by the “war on terror” has encouraged legal and political harassment of Arab-Americans (generally loyal Americans) for conduct that has not been unique to them. A case in point is the reported harassment of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for its attempts to emulate, not very successfully, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Some House Republicans recently described CAIR members as “terrorist apologists” who should not be allowed to use a Capitol meeting room for a panel discussion. Social discrimination, for example toward Muslim air travelers, has also been its unintended byproduct. Not surprisingly, animus toward the United States even among Muslims otherwise not particularly concerned with the Middle East has intensified, while America’s reputation as a leader in fostering constructive interracial and interreligious relations has suffered egregiously. The record is even more troubling in the general area of civil rights. The culture of fear has bred intolerance, suspicion of foreigners and the adoption of legal procedures that undermine fundamental notions of justice. Innocent until proven guilty has been diluted if not undone, with some—even U.S. citizens—incarcerated for lengthy periods of time without effective and prompt access to due process. There is no known, hard evidence that such excess has prevented significant acts of terrorism, and convictions for would-be terrorists of any kind have been few and far between. Someday Americans will be as ashamed of this record as they now have become of the earlier instances in U.S. history of panic by the many prompting intolerance against the few. In the meantime, the “war on terror” has gravely damaged the United States internationally. For Muslims, the similarity between the rough treatment of Iraqi civilians by the U.S. military and of the Palestinians by the Israelis has prompted a widespread sense of hostility toward the United States in general. It’s not the “war on terror” that angers Muslims watching the news on television, it’s the victimization of Arab civilians. And the resentment is not limited to Muslims. A recent BBC poll of 28,000 people in 27 countries that sought respondents’ assessments of the role of states in international affairs resulted in Israel, Iran and the United States being rated (in that order) as the states with “the most negative influence on the world.” Alas, for some that is the new axis of evil! The events of 9/11 could have resulted in a truly global solidarity against extremism and terrorism. A global alliance of moderates, including Muslim ones, engaged in a deliberate campaign both to extirpate the specific terrorist networks and to terminate the political conflicts that spawn terrorism would have been more productive than a demagogically proclaimed and largely solitary U.S. “war on terror” against “Islamo-fascism.” Only a confidently determined and reasonable America can promote genuine international security which then leaves no political space for terrorism. Where is the U.S. leader ready to say, “Enough of this hysteria, stop this paranoia”? Even in the face of future terrorist attacks, the likelihood of which cannot be denied, let us show some sense. Let us be true to our traditions. Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, is the author, most recently, of “Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower” (Basic Books). Previous item: The L.A. Times Scandal: A Cautionary Tale Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Canuckfilm, May 2, 2007 at 3:04 pm #
CIVIC DUTY, a film opening May 4th, asks some of these tough questions:
How responsible is the media for post 9/11 paranoia and intolerance? What is the line between “Civic Duty” and vigilantism?
Check out this psychological thriller, starring Peter Krause (Six Feet Under), and Richard Schiff (The West Wing).
An out of work accountant, Terry (Krause), bombarded with cable news and media obsession with terrorist plots in post 9/11 America, receives a jolt when an unattached Islamic graduate student moves in next door. Convinced his new neighbour poses a terrorist threat, Terry takes matters into his own hands, and things spiral out of control.
CIVIC DUTY puts a human face on the atmosphere of fear and distrust that fuels the so-called war on terror. And it suggests runaway patriotism comes with a cost to our soul.
Links:
Report thishttp://firstweekendclub.ca
http://www.civicdutythemovie.com
http://www.myspace.com/civicdutyfilm
By RobertBennett, April 9, 2007 at 5:26 pm #
A foreign policy question for Mr. Brzezinski
-Iran justifiably captures British spies in it’s own waters.
-Iran (Islamic Fundamentalist) releases the British (Christian) spies in time for Easter, and declares them as a ‘Gift for Briton’.
-No deal is cut; it actually is a Gift.
The Muslims don’t celebrate Easter, but they seem to have done a much better job at getting its message.
This seems like a extraordinary gesture of Peace on the part of Iran.
And now for my question:
This could be a pathway to Peace in the Middle East; shouldn’t we be jumping all over this?
If you would like to send Iranian President Mahmood Ahmadinejad a message of good will, his email address is:
dr-ahmadinejad at president dot ir
If our leaders aren’t smart enough to grab at this chance for peace, then We the People will have to do it instead.
His Blog is here:
http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/
--
Report thisPeace,
Bob Bennett
Lick Skillet, AL
By Robert Bennett, April 8, 2007 at 4:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’ve found, when in conflict, it can be helpful to consider things from the other point of view. This works best if you can, using imagination, immerse yourself in your opponents perspective.
For example:
I am a terrorist. I live in the desert and I hate America.
I am well financed and sophisticated. I watch TV.
In the half-decade since 911, I have been obsessing about ways to attack America. But, despite my sophistication, I have failed to notice that Americas southern border is an enormous, and completely open....
...desert.
Our government assures us that, by spending massive amounts of money, and furiously whittling away at The Constitution, they have successfully prevented terrorists from entering the United States.
Our government also assures us that, despite spending massive amounts of money, and furiously whittling away at The Constitution, they cannot prevent millions of starving immigrants, and countless tons of illegal drugs, from entering the United States.
So, we have succeeded in keeping out terrorists, but have failed in keeping out immigrants and illegal drugs. It seems to me, that well financed and sophisticated terrorist groups could manage to land anywhere in Central or South America, disguise their weapons as a load of marijuana, and then waltz across the border anytime they wished.
This apparent contradiction is the result of differing needs from the two main power structures governing The United States. The political and the bureaucratic.
The political power structure is elected, and terms are limited. They must curry enough favor with the citizenry to get re-elected. They want to appear as powerful and competent as possible and one hundred percent effectiveness is always desired. The perception of completely solving a problem is a big feather in their caps (and helps insure continued Power for their Party).
Therefore, they have succeeded in keeping out terrorists.
The bureaucratic power structure is not elected. In order to insure long and fruitful careers, bureaucratic agencies must show themselves to be needed. Complete success means looking for another job and so, one hundred percent effectiveness is not desired
Therefore, immigrants and illegal drugs continue to flow into the United States.
So, we can keep out sophisticated and well financed terrorists, but we cannot keep out homeless and starving Mexicans, and countless tons of illegal drugs.
Interesting, huh?
Due to the obvious presence of illegal immigrants and illegal drugs in our country, Im going to have to believe the bureaucrats on this one.
The War on Terror is purely political. The enemy does not exist.
I realize the money is gone forever, but could I have my rights back now?
Please?
Peace,
Report thisBob Bennett
Lick Skillet, Alabama
By Chuck Klaer, April 3, 2007 at 7:27 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself”
Responding to Comment #61858 by Sosodomite
I think there may be an angle relating to fear that is being over looked. A great deal has been written and implied about the role of fear since 911. But a curious reader has to search the back shelves of internet offerings to begin to understand the substance of Roosevelts visionary statement. Many years ago I had the opportunity to attend a lecture that Dr. Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, author of “On Death and Dying” and On Grief and Grieving gave at Cornell University. After 911, I searched and searched the internet for information on dealing with mass hysteria. I assumed there must be some analysis of how people deal with fear that was analogous to the stages Kubler-Ross identified for dealing with death and grieving. I had no luck.
It wasnt until I accidentally came across a 2002 article on fear in Discover Magazine at my local grocery store that I learned about the role the amygdala, an almond shaped gland in the brain, plays regarding how we react to perceived threats. Ive added Amygdala to my Google Alerts. Since 2001, especially due to the much wider availability and use of fMRI scanners, the available information on the influence of the amygdala has increased significantly. Much of it is academic and much of it is not directly related to mass hysteria. Nevertheless, I am persuaded that the behavior of many people continues to be controlled, and I mean controlled, by the way their amygdala reflexively imprinted their memories.I am persuaded that the fear reaction is not cognitively chosen, but as the Discover Article and other material indicates an instinctive happening beyond one’s control. It also appears that desensitizing a behavioral response to fear is not at this time a simple task. I have no way of knowing whether all, some or no fear mongers actually understand the impact of what they are doing, are intentionally manipulating the population as the ubiquitous Goebbels quote implies, or simply miserable fearfulness in search of company. If any of you are interested in the fear resonse, I suggest spending a little time learning about the amygdala. You may also learn something about yourself.
Here are two YouTube examples. One for the flight response and the other for the fight response. Note both responses are faster than cognitive thought.
Flight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOCZcwKt-M
Fight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp4g8mIKHfo&mode=re lated&search;=
Report thisBy Kol Klink, April 2, 2007 at 11:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It is a giant leap for Zbig to hop from ‘democracy is not compatable with empire so the American People must be convinced by whatever means’ (yes, I am paraphrasing from one of his tomes) to a Zbig that is ranting about the improper use of terror to distort America and her Peoples and be a detriment to Democracy!
Sounds like he is now employed by the same folks that brought us the Iraq Study Group.
Sounds like the neo cons and the old guard butting heads...again.
Report thisBy Sosodomite, April 2, 2007 at 6:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Fear is eradicated by knowledge and information, precisely what the Bush administration seeks to limit. They select the language and the topic. They never factored in the Web. We progressives own the Web and will pamphlet our way to “total information awareness”. Real fear is waking up as George Bush or Dick Cheney, not knowing if that was a car backfiring or the last sound you will ever hear.
Report thisBy Jonas South, April 2, 2007 at 6:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
#60851 by Stig Nilsson
You ask: “..or is it too late?”
It may not be too late, but in my mind, I envision us walking along a precipice; one more misstep and we go over the edge, beyond salvation.
Yet, here and there, courageous, far sighted people are taking small steps: moving towards neutralizing the Electoral College, whistle blowing in the Justice Dept., speaking out eloquently as you do ....
Report thisBy Perry Glickman, April 1, 2007 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ziggy finally realized the cold war is over. And its replacement has fumbled into a far hotter region. It’s a little late for backpedaling- but better late than never.
The coming war with the worlds muslims, all one billion of them, will be won by the slow strangulation of the US from its lifeblood- oil.
When the economy collapses from the scarcity of oil, the war will be fought here- among ourselves.
Report thisBy Truth Be Told, March 30, 2007 at 7:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Democrats have undermined America, they have acted in an unconstitutional manner that is, to me, PATHETIC!
If your afraid now, just you wait...if we SURRENDER, our situation is going to be a nightmare that WILL NOT go away!
Report thisBy Claude, March 30, 2007 at 7:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Readers of the above feature should be interested reading this amazing report or essay, not published but leaked in 1967, a product of the Kennedy era.
The author identity was and is still the object of controversy.
The report can be downloaded from Internet and to facilitate your search, I have reproduced down, the table of content.
The Report From Iron Mountain
A Satirical Indictment of RANDthink
by Leonard Lewin
“The organizing principle of any society is for war. The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers.”
Report thisTable of Contents
Introduction
Section 1: Scope of the Study
Section 2: Disarmament and the Economy
Section 3: Disarmament Scenarios
Section 4: War and Peace as Social Systems
Section 5: The Functions of War
Section 6: Substitutes for the Functions of War
Section 7: Summary and Conclusions
Section 8: Recommendations
Footnote Section
Leonard Lewin’s self-review
By Chuck KLaer, March 30, 2007 at 1:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
If ...If Zbig has changed his stripes, I’m happy for him and for us since he gets face time on TV as a “credible” foreign policy expert. Before I welcome him with open arms, I’d be more comfortable if one of his books would describe how and when he changed from being a champion of Empire to a spokesperson for the post colonial and Empire eras. How many Iraqi’s had died before his epiphany? When did he learn that Super Power Goliath’s could be brought down by any David/Lilliputian whose dignity Zbig now respects with a minimum investment? When did he return to the Golden Rule from the 1% Solution of Cheney? I’ve been too disappointed by claims of “born again”, so I’m just suggesting before we climb on Zbig’s band wagon, we wait and watch to see whether he is serious or just a new student of Frank Luntz’s “Words that Work”, involved in political priming for a last hurrah appointment post November, 2008.
Report thisBy David Macaray, March 30, 2007 at 10:13 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The poster calling him/herself “a voice from the wilderness” is correct. Those who criticize Zbignew for changing his views should consider John Maynard Keynes’ response to a critic who ravaged him for reversing a position.
Said Keynes, “I admit that when I encounter new information, I change my mind. What, may I ask, do you do with it?”
Report thisBy rowdy, March 29, 2007 at 7:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
10 years ago when i bought my house,my street was occupied mostly by white rednecks. several of the rednecks still live here. i keep saying rednecks for a reason. the street has changed. we now have non english speaking people living in 9 of 14 houses. at least 4 of the families are moslems,you can kind of tell by the clothes the women wear. the children attend public schools and all speak english,even though the parents do not. as near as i can tell everyone in the neighborhood gets along very well. i don’t get any feel of fear where i live.
Report thisBy a voice from the wilderness, March 29, 2007 at 4:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Just one question for those of you who slam Zbig’s change of heart ...
Would you rather have someone who’s willing to change their views with the benefit of history, or one who stubbornly stays the course, regardless of the realities on the ground?
Report thisBy Robert Bennett, March 29, 2007 at 7:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
http://www.JimmyCarterForPresident.com
This is my first web site; it’s clunky and not well organized yet, but I’m getting there.
I realized he’s 82. But he’s the only one I trust.
We are heading towards 16 years of a moral vacuum in the White House. Even many of President Carter’s critics acknowledge his legendary honesty and morality.
He would tell us the truth about what’s going on, but nobody can fix it. Only The People can do that, and Jimmy Carter could show us the way.
Bless you, Mr. Brzezinski.
Peace,
Report thisBob Bennett
Lick Skillet, AL
By Dr. Richard Blackmoor, March 29, 2007 at 1:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Of course it was planned. The definition of terrorist is so vague in the so called “patriot act” that a kid shooting a stop sign with a BB gun is a terrorist. Call on Congress to repeal this horrible act which robs Americans of Freedom and makes us less safe from actual dangers.
Report thisThe war On Drugs was the blueprint for the War On Terror. It is a policy based on have truths and lies,allows the government to jail and investigate anyone ,it makes large sums of cash for those in the government and enables banks to get rich through money laundering, it cannot be won because it was never ment to end and it gives politicians an enemy to demonize so the public will be distracted from finding out the outright corruption of government . It also allows large corperations to collude with the government in robbing the American people and have the duped American public to support there own demise.
It is no accident that the original neo-con Nixon, followed by Reagun started the war on drugs. Follow the money and the power.
Both of these so called wars are counterproductive and bad for the health of the American Nation.
By john merriman, March 28, 2007 at 4:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
i applaud zbig for speaking out and sounding like a loyal dissenter. I appreciate his support for president carters book and his critique of the israeli lobby aipac, he has also defended the president against the american jewish community as they have attacked him with anti semitic howls for his book on israels treatment of the palestinians. It does appear that zbig tells it with some clarity and is not succeptible to the intimidation that normally causes others to cower and not speak up. the war on terrorism is a war on our rights and priviledges here in america.
Report thisBy Boris Fisk, March 28, 2007 at 12:53 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well, Zbig… It was your idea in the first place (your book-"the Grand Chessboard") to have a Pearl Harbor-like event to catalyze the population into getting behind an invasion of the Middle East to control the remaining oil reserves. You probably had a hand in 9/11 as well. But your plan hasn’t gone too well now has it… Your belated concerns are disingenuous and pathetic. What a jerk.
Report thisBy Chuck Klaer, March 28, 2007 at 12:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Zbig post epiphany is a pleasure to watch and read. I sometimes find myself wondering whether this is the same Zbig who dismissed the unintended consequences of our support of the muhajedin and Talaban in Afghanistan against the Soviet occupation since he believes it lead to the fall of the Soviet Union. An those who read his book “Chessboard” might find little difference between his vision of controlling the center of the chessboard (Central Asia) and that of the Neocons.
Report thisI for one certainly prefer the current Zbig.
By felicity, March 28, 2007 at 11:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Today’s “terrorists” want REVENGE, RENOWN AND REACTION - which is exactly what what we gave them and are continuing to give them. So, just exactly who is winning the “war” so far?
Report thisBy Tim, March 28, 2007 at 8:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is a very accurate commentary. If the current state of affairs was precipitated by mere incompetence, I would not worry so much. I believe, however, that the entire ‘culture of fear’, along with the propaganda of the the so-called ‘war on terror’, has been conciously planned and implemented by a relatively small group of political opportunists. The bottom line is who profits from this manufactured war without end? Follow the money trail, and pull the plug on this farse, and the blatant manipulation of the American people will finally end.
Report thisBy Bill Blackolive, March 28, 2007 at 8:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Brzezinski, all you point out is so. While I feel is is long overdue somebody respected in the media comments it is rather odd how 3 not 2 gov. buildings sank into their foundations 9/11. It is odd, quite odd, and building #7 was not struck by airplane, had no “faulty engineering,” and sank the same. Do we speak of reality, or live fear ridden till somebody can manage their takeover.
Report thisBy LilyMaskew, March 28, 2007 at 8:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This administration’s “War on Terror” has turned the land of the free and the home of the brave into a county chained to its fear, and our current president holds all the keys. After all that has ensued, I have decided to speak out more, to let my congressmen know my opinions, to be unafraid of “what if.” I do not want to live behind walls and suspect evey member of another nationality. I want to be brave, and thus, only die but once.
Report thisBy William Lewis, March 28, 2007 at 7:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
How can you make war on hate? The hate that drives most so called terrorists. Well lets just strike that word terrorist. How about pissed off human being. I can look into bush and chenneys distorted mentalities and see why they are so afraid, and even the desire to exterminate the people who hate them. However if they had any common sense they would realize that every time one of their bombs destroys the lives of the actual ones who cease to become human beings and instantaneously become fragments of red meat hung on to the rubble that was once their homes. There are left the reminisce of the families, brothers, sisters, grandmothers, perhaps even children, although children usually dont fair to well when a bomb goes off in their home. These people will spend the rest of their lives hating mainly bush, and also the military and politicians of this country. But not the people of this country, because it is common knowledge throughout the world that the majority of the people in this country detest bush and his evil war. So this is why Bush is so very frightened, I would be to if I had the majority of the people in the world hating me like he does.
Report thisHate is also infectious, the people who share their roll as the expendable lower classes as seen through the eyes of people like bush, and see their brothers and sisters disrespected, tortured, denied the basic rights that any real human being is guaranteed, killed and raped and generally treated worse than animals, also become pissed off human beings who will spend the rest of their lives too with only the destruction of the ones responsible on their minds.
And this hate only intensifies.
This is why I cringe every time I hear the phrase Win the war on terror. This is why bush will never win this war, if it must be called a war. I would prefer it not be called a war at all, this thing that is going on in Iraq Is a manifestation of all that is wrong with humanity in general, all rolled up in a bloody package.
The thinking people of this country are not afraid. Partly because we know that life in general is a precarious path, and have prepared ourselves for that and yes of course the scary terrorists. Well we know that they are simply our fellow human beings, and we also know that their hate at least is not driven by greed.
By Del Kroupa, March 28, 2007 at 7:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Zbig shows us what a reasoned, well thought out, response to 9/11 should have been, rather than the exploitation of that tragedy in an attempt to further the neocon agenda that we have seen. How many years will it take to undo the damage that the incompetents have done? Zbig, we miss your wisdom.
Report thisBy Morf Morford, March 28, 2007 at 6:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Unlike Americans, Iraqis have an experiential knowledge of history. They have been invaded and occupied dozens, if not hundreds of times, in the past two or three thousand years. Like the Viet-namese, they have no qualms about fighting a hundred year war against any occupier. Our timelines mean nothing to the Iraqis. They are fighting for their homeland and their beliefs. The longer we are there, the more we confirm the beliefs of the Jihadists who see us as just another infidel invader/colonizer. No matter how long we stay, we will always be foreigners. And the longer we stay, the more passionately the Iraqi people will hate us - and there will be more of them. And they won’t just be Iraqis.
There will be no decisive battles in Iraq. There will be no D-day, no Lexington, no V-day. We will just have more piddling wearing down. There will be no clear cut victory - for Iraq or us.
It would be easy to make the argument that the Soviet Union collapsed because of its sustained involvement in Afghanistan. Perhaps the question is “How long will we stay in Iraq?” The answer depends on how foolish and ignorant we are determined to be. Are we willing to bleed our economy and our national morale for, well, I don’t know what. The rhetoric about the “war on terror” sounds emptier and more Orwellian by the day. We are looking more and more like the vacuous imperialists of the not so distant past. Is there anything more unAmerican than that?
“Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.” Douglas Adams
Report thisBy David Macaray, March 28, 2007 at 5:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
As smart and sobering as Zbig’s essay was, I sometimes wonder if it isn’t already too late. It seems as if America has turned a corner and begun its way down a path to--not “self-destruction” as Gore Vidal, Chalmers Johnson, and others think we have--but a path to incurable self-absorption.
We no longer seem capable of looking at the world through the eyes of the world, but only through our own eyes. And our own eyes sparkle with our own interests, which in turn, are manufactured by corporate fascists, political zealots and military-industrial snake oil salesmen.
Other than that, things seem to be improving.
Report thisBy Stig Nilsson, March 27, 2007 at 7:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The National Paranoia
Mr. Brzezinski is giving me and other people of the 4:th world a reason to hope for a better tomorrow. We in our world that has no boundaries and is populated by the kind and considerate people will be happy to grant Mr. Brzezinski his informal citizenship expeditiously.
Who ever planned the 9/11 incident must be pleasantly surprised over the outcome… It released The National Paranoia which has caused the death of thousands of young men and women, sent the economy of the country down +3trillions in the red and made its inhabitants loose most of their civil rights. It has also created a gigantic new profession of security inspectors that are growing in numbers everyday. In a near future if this mental condition is deepening we will make everybody suspects and start reporting on each other .
To be kind and considerate in resent history would have meant that the people who suffered in the Nazi Concentration Camps would be given aid and comfort but not on the expense of the Palestinians.
The lesson is: Be sure that it really is your land before you give it away
It is my firm believe that the Israel/Palestinian conflict is the root cause of todays horrible situation in the world.
It has forced a spiral of violence in the Middle East with Israelis and USA on one side and Palestinians and most of the Arab world on the other . And its getting worse by the day because more force creates more counter force as its the law of nature.
For the men and women in power who has loved to escalate violence until now please stop and consider what have been achieved
Report thisWhy not be honest and admit past mistakes and try kindness for a change or is it too late?
By david allen, March 27, 2007 at 7:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Of course Dr B is brilliantly correct so far as he goes. But the situation demands an analysis of the actual trivial economic damage and a minuscule number of deaths (3k) occurring on 9/11. In contrast, some 15K people are murdered in the USA every year. And some 50k are killed in traffic accidents annually.
Report thisFrom such puny harm, our society was set on its ear and we are suffering the profound sorrow of hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths and maimings. As well as hundreds of billions of precious treasure expended.
But more significantly, who was the evil genius who transformed a tragedy into an enormous catastrophe? Certainly not the brain dead Bush.
By Jackie T. Gabel, March 27, 2007 at 5:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
He knows the score; is very clear on the growing possibility of another provocation, but if he took the plunge and admitted publicly that 9/11 (as he knows it to be the case) was plotted not ...in distant Afghan caves, but more likely in war-game rooms at Langley, Chantilly, Arlington or one of Blackwater Securitys offices, OReilly, et al would roast him like a Polish sausage and feed him to the rabble.
But Zbiggys had his hand in this game longer than the 911 coup plotters and his NWO ties are probably richer than theirs. Hes now working on the less-than-strangelove side of the schism trying to rein in the madmen without blowing the coverup, triggering the biggest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War and precipitating a global financial meltdown. But, its getting harder by the day to keep the 911 genii in the bottle and eventually limited hangouts like this will be broadly acknowledged for what they are.
Report thisBy Matt Kremer, March 27, 2007 at 5:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Like I really need input from somebody selected by the worst president in modern American history, maybe all of American history. If ZB had his shit together, he would’ve gotten another gig after the peanut farmer. No such luck.
Report thisBy Steve Hammons, March 27, 2007 at 3:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Brzezinski is obviously correct that creating fear of terror seems to have been a main goal of the Bush-Cheney administration, the neocons and war profiteers.
The main question might be to ask if this was an honestly mistaken approach to take—or was it part of a well-thought-out plan to facilitate multiple agendas ... some overt and some covert.
Americans seem to be in danger from enemies foreign and domestic ... including from within places of power in our own society. For more on this, see:
‘Mistakes’ or ‘plans’ in Iraq, War on Terror?
By Steve Hammons
Columnist, PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America
February 12, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/mistakes_or_plans_in_ir aq_war_on_terror
Report thisBy LG, March 27, 2007 at 3:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bravo, Z.B. At leasr someone has intelligence. Z.B. realizes the hysteria is a herding technique by fascists to corall republics and democracies into fascist states.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, March 27, 2007 at 2:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
That last paragraph in the article here could be a cue for some ‘08 presidential aspirant to rise above the all-too-easy and seductive politics of fear and campaign for the kind of rigorous national self-examination that a few people called for on 9/11/01 and for awhile afterwards....until all such voices were drowned-out by the baying hounds of WAR. What Brzezinski does not address here, except as hidden in his faithful parroting of the official lies about the actual events of 9/11, is the very active and perhaps still growing presence of interests and forces (more than a few based here in the “homeland") who’ve staked everything on the installment and operation of this latest reign of terror disguised (Orwellian fashion) as “The War ON Terror.”
To lament as he does that the long-time rule of fear he himself propagated back in his day has now metasticized into its inevitable terminal configuration seems to this old Indian to be more than a little disingenuous. Still, maybe it is better late than not at all that another Cold Warrior comes to see that atomic weapons aren’t the only deadly “geniis” uncorked by that also totally contrived confrontation.
And ‘Zbig’ is certainly right in his contention that this “wound” is, like the nuclear one, entirely self-inflicted. This leaves unanswered, though, the critical question of whether a bunch of domesticated people suffering as well from a number of other serious and auto-administered afflictions can come up with whatever medicine it will take to heal theirselves.
More and more of the hair of the dog that bit ‘em might make for good theater, but it probably won’t work worth a damn. Us Indians have something that might. Come see us if live long enough to realize that.
HokaHey!
Report thisBy DFC, March 27, 2007 at 2:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Somewhere in the mid-1990s, as I came of age in a political sense, it occurred to me that I’m thankful to be an American, but not particularly proud. Since the reaction to the events of September 2001, I’m not so sure if I can even be thankful anymore--I’m sure not proud; shameful would be more accurate. I was indoctrinated throughout the 1970s and into the early 1980s as a (public) schoolchild in California to believe in what this nation was supposed to stand for. I am a very disappointed, betrayed citizen. Lately it’s been seeming that either I leave my brain behind, or I leave my country behind. I can’t live without my brain.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, March 27, 2007 at 2:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Zbigniew Brzezinski is a noble, courageous, patriotic and reasonable American statesman. It is sad that he and president Carter are not anymore at the helm in leading America in these times of crises. Instead we have pathetic bunch of leaders who stole two elections, lied, misled, brainwashed and brought fear and corruption to the land and are responsible for the wasted blood of untold thousands of Americans and Iraqis and billions of dollars in wasted treasure.
By way of emphasis and summary, I am quoting the following words from this wonderful piece:
“War on terror did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue.”
So for the sake of the good of America and the world, brainwashed Americans should wake up, rebel against the new “slavery of fear” and tell Bush and gang that you suck!
Report this