![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Ramadi Blast Details DivergePosted on Feb 28, 2007The proliferation of conflicting, even contradictory, media accounts of Tuesday’s explosion in Ramadi is reaching head-spinning proportions. The mystery deepened Wednesday, a full day after the BBC and other news outlets originally reported that 18 children were killed and 20 others injured by a car bomb as they gathered to play football in the western Iraqi city. At this point, the cause of the explosion, who was responsible, and the number of resulting deaths or injuries remain uncertain. Truthdig reviewed multiple sources but found distressingly little overlap by Wednesday’s end. To recap: Initial reports of the deaths of 18 boys ages 10 to 15 were countered by an American spokesman Tuesday, who described the blast to Reuters as a “controlled” detonation set off by U.S. troops. He also said he was unaware of any other explosions in that area and that about 30 people were injured, including a few children, but none killed.
To make matters more confusing, an update from Reuters on Tuesday quoted an American military representative, Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, who suggested that “two separate incidents” may have occurred in the same area.
So, were U.S. forces behind the Ramadi blast? Criminal gangs? Were there two “incidents” or one? Was the explosion contained or intentionally deadly? The story may change again, but we hope it will soon be a coherent and verifiable report rather than yet another round in an international game of telephone. UPDATE: Follow this link to read DoD-authorized publication Stars and Stripes’ account of the confusion. Previous item: Pentagon Whistle-Blower on the Coming War With Iran Next item: Greed by Any Other Name Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Hal, March 1, 2007 at 8:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I can’t tell if Quy Tran is being ironic or not. Do you mean that whatever American troops do is by definition good, or are you saying that if it was American troops that set off the explosion, then that’s who should be labeled “terrorist”?
Report thisBy Ga, March 1, 2007 at 11:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It is just typical “first reports” gone through several people before finally getting to newspapers.
It almost always happens this way. First reports are almost always have inaccuracies. And I do not think that many people know this. Any news-junky should (any one who actually reads the many reports, fully, and then continues to follow the story).
Frankly, people who constantly read the headlines and first few paragraphs of breaking news are more likely to be more ill-informed than those who wait and read in-depth reports that come out months for even years later in books and through documentaries.
Some of the very best documentaries ever to be produced are on PBS television: Frontline, Frontline/World, P.O.V. and Independent Lens—all of which are at risk as has been noted on Truthdig.
Report thisBy Quy Tran, March 1, 2007 at 10:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Excuse me, U.S. troops never killed children, pregnant women or committed raping. Only terrorists did.
Report thisBy Christopher Cuttance, March 1, 2007 at 9:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
So, the US military set off a controlled explosion and admits injuring 30 people with it? Excuse me?
Report this