LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 20, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

The Lotto Symbolizes the False Promises of Barracuda Capitalism

Obama Unscathed by Scandals, Mayor Denies Smoking Crack, and More

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

Is Democracy in Trouble?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * What Will Tighter Restrictions on Trade in Iran Do?
 * NEW! * Is Democracy in Trouble?
 * NEW! * Rise Up or Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Storm from the East

Storm from the East

Milton Viorst
$ 11.16

more items

 
Reports

Keep GOP Feet to the Fire

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Feb 19, 2007

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

WASHINGTON—Two things are now abundantly clear about the future of U.S. policy toward Iraq. First, majorities in both houses of Congress have lost faith in President Bush’s approach to the war. Second, the president will do all he can to resist changing his strategy by trying to split his critics into ineffectual factions.

Bush’s choice is certainly bad for opponents of the war, but it’s also bad for American foreign policy.

The president is inviting a full-scale confrontation over his war-making powers in the expectation that the Democrats’ narrow majorities will deprive them of the votes they need to win such a fight. He is ready to split the country rather than give any ground to those who question whether it’s wise to risk ensnaring American troops in a Sunni-Shiite civil war.

The challenge to critics of the war is to make the debate about Bush, not themselves, and to make clear that the president has rebuffed all efforts to pursue a bipartisan path out of Iraq, beginning with his rejection of the core recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, headed by James A. Baker III and Lee Hamilton.

Changing our policy will require a substantial Republican rebellion. The 17 House Republicans who voted for the resolution opposing the president’s surge and the seven Senate Republicans who tried to get a vote for the House-passed measure are a start.

Advertisement

The next steps pursued by the war’s critics must be premised on the goal of expanding this circle of Republican opposition because, as Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., put it on “Meet the Press” over the weekend, “Republican influence on the president might be more decisive than the Democratic voices.”

For now, the war’s opponents are focused on three strategies. One would be to cut off funds for the war, but there is currently no majority in either house for this. A second approach, expected to come from Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., would propose restrictions on troop deployments—for example, forbidding the redeployment of units that have been home for less than a year and imposing substantial training requirements on the troops that are sent.

The Murtha measure would at least force a much-needed debate on the damage this war has done to our armed forces and the extraordinary burdens being borne by the brave minority of Americans who serve. It would also sidestep the political damage of doing anything that could be construed by Bush’s supporters as “failing to support our troops.”

But the sense that the proposal has been crafted in part for reasons of political convenience and the intricate restrictions it would place on the military are precisely what could doom it. The war’s opponents need other options.

A third path, offered by Sens. Joseph Biden, D-Del., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., would have Congress revisit its original 2002 Iraq resolution to make clear that the war authorized then (against Saddam Hussein and what turned out to be nonexistent weapons of mass destruction) had nothing to do with putting American troops in the midst of a Muslim civil war now.

The Biden-Levin idea has the advantage of pushing Republicans who are quietly doubtful about Bush’s path out into the open. In particular, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., who rightly called this weekend for a more bipartisan approach to Iraq, nonetheless keeps voting his party’s line in the Senate. That, in turn, enables Bush to pursue the very sort of divisive partisanship on the war that Lugar says he’s against.

Lugar and others in his party who harbor doubts about Bush’s approach must be challenged again and again to justify actions that allow the president to bull ahead by dividing his opposition.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., has an additional idea: Opponents of the war need to force full consideration of the original Baker-Hamilton proposals that, he said, promised to put American policy “on a trajectory to have our combat troops out of Iraq this time next year” and reflected “the center of gravity in Congress.” Whatever its flaws, the Iraq Study Group report could still serve as a focal point for sharply reducing America’s military role in Iraq before the 2008 election.

“The refusal of the administration to try to work with others to resolve this in a responsible manner has created a very polarized atmosphere,” Van Hollen said. “They’ve refused to listen to anyone else.”

That should be the central theme of the president’s critics because it’s true—and because it offers the best rallying cry for those seeking to change a disastrous policy.

E.J. Dionne Jr.‘s e-mail address is postchat(at symbol)aol.com.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Bert, February 24, 2007 at 1:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Congress, as a body, needs to stand up pretty much in unison, and revoke the war authorization.
That, and we need to run a national fuel conservation program. Read up on what Jimmy Carter had to say about this whole business. Say what you want, Jimmy’s pretty smart. Go Jimmy, and good luck in all your endeavors!

Report this

By NathanHale, February 23, 2007 at 5:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

1.  Confidence needs to be restored in the voting process via “unhackable” verifiable ballots.

2.  Term limits for elected officals in all 50 states.

3.  Campaign financing reform: i.e.lobby reform.

These 3 simple things would be a good start.

Report this

By Canadianguy, February 21, 2007 at 6:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, well, well, history repeats itself, does it? We speak of Congress and they spoke of the Reichstag in 1930. Self-interest takes many forms. Whatever disconnect with the people occurs, the end result is the same. Now rise, dear Fascists. Rise. Take us all by surprise. Cloak all your evil intentions in phrases such as “democracy must win out over terrorism.” It is when the will and democracy of the people rise and the revolution is about to break, that you always show your fascist face. Here we go again. Gimme a scotch, somebody, make it a triple!

Report this

By Margaret, February 21, 2007 at 1:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is a addition to what #54456/rabblerowzer/2/20.  Everything you say is true, after all since the middle class pay the taxes, should they not get something back?  When you look at the police, transit operators and the like their job depends on the common people, not the rich or well connected this country always had that, but the people who fight and die should have somethng to say also.

Margaret from Vancouver, Washington

Report this

By John Farbstein, February 21, 2007 at 10:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There’s another way, Mr. Dionne, to get us out of Iraq and a possible war with Iran: IMPEACH the bastards! (both Bush and Cheney)  The Demos don’t have to use the word “impeach,” they simply have to use their power to investigate, including use of subpoenas, the fraudulent run-up to the war.  They don’t even have to focus on illegal wiretapping or elimination of habeas corpus for suspected “terrorists.”  When BushCheney refuses to comply with the subpoenas, then the impeachment word should be let loose.  I suspect that the majority of Americans will agree with impeachment when faced with the fact that BushCheney deliberately led us into the Iraq debacle, knowing full well that the intelligence on WMD was doubtful, and the connection with 9/11 was non-existent.  The Demos should couple impeachment with a call for early elections following impeachment, so that they cannot be accused of trying to crown “President Pelosi.”

Report this

By Dennis D, February 20, 2007 at 8:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Democrats have been steamrolled for the last 6 years by this administration and now that they have a slim majority in both outhouses of Congress they are supposed to change everything? Without enough votes to override a veto - who is kidding who. Bu$h Inc. knows they hold the whip hand for the next, sad to say, two years. Without the Dems willing to use even the threat of impeachment against Bu$h expect the same old same old in the District of Corruption.

Report this

By dick, February 20, 2007 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Admin and the Congress are influenced only by other than the masses. We, the masses,  have no effect, no clout. What to do? Form a new group of the working masses. Perhaps call it the AAWP..American Association of Working People. The purpose of this organization is to work for the best balanced interests of all Americans.At this time only the power elite, the special-interest lobbys and PACS, the media moguls, and a few wealthy individuals have any influence in Washington. The AAWP could and should do the same.

Report this

By Quy Tran, February 20, 2007 at 1:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Don’t keep GOP feet in fire but in their mouth.

Report this

By Bert, February 20, 2007 at 11:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, someone else is going to have to go find em, but I’ll happily pay for and stoke the charcoal….and sing a happy tune the entire time, maybe we can even have hot dogs and cheap malt liquor!(charcoal’s getting more expensive, ya know)

Point is, the GOP’s little party is over, which could spell curtains for the big party too. Suffice it to say there’s not much ‘conservative’ about the ‘conservatives’ anymore, and it’s high time, yes, high time, that those of more sound moral principles and still in possession of something like ethics that haven’t ‘lost the plot’ take issue with these spendthrift charlatans that’ve seen fit to royally screw with our country. From Exxon to illegal immigration, to the Patriot Act and god only knows what else they’ve been doing, it’s time for this particular clown circus to be OVER. Maybe it’s been profitable for them, maybe they count what they’ve done as ‘victory’, and maybe it was some rich people that basically decided to wring every penny out of our country that they could. They already found out one of these sympathizer people was dumping money into the GOP. Corruption and incompetence sans third party oversight are a lethal combination…luckily, there’s still some people under the age of 80 in Congress with their hats on straight, who’ve been watching all this activity with keen detached interest, and taking copious notes of all goings-on. And, now is their moment to stand up and shine, and our moment to voice strong support for the necessary and long-overdue reforms in washington that will be necessary to mend fences and get the budget balanced, among other things, and probably fire a whole laundry list of people. The Iraq war will stand as our most egregious screwup of the 21st century, and only through untiring and diligent effort will a lot of things be put right.

Report this

By Outraged, February 20, 2007 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We’re not polarized here in America on the war issue.  We just have senators and representatives who do not vote for the voice of the people they reprensent. (By the way this what they’re supposed to do!) These repukes vote with a view to personal gain and they’re perfectly OK with that.  “AMERICA BE DAMMED” is apparently their motto.

Report this

By oregoncharles, February 20, 2007 at 10:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This whole piece is silly.  WE need to hold the DEMOCRATS’ “feet to the fire” to get the troops out of Iraq.  Symbolic resolutions of disapproval - of the escalation, not the war - aren’t going to cut it, and the Dems in Congress know that perfectly well.

“Support the Troops” is nothing but an excuse to support the war itself.  There is already plenty of funding to “support” them while they withdraw; any further funding should be for withdrawal, only.  Withholding funding is the only approach that can’t be vetoed.  Remember, the House alone can do that: they don’t even need the Senate.  They originate funding bills; they can rewrite it and pass it with plenty of support and nothing to keep the war going on.  Let’s see Bush veto the funds to “support the troops.”

The Democrats in Congress have run out of excuses, and Dionne’s article is just trying to give them political cover while they perpetuate the war they supported all along.  It’s more than silly; it’s shameful.

Report this

By Bert, February 20, 2007 at 10:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The more I read, the more I’m of the viewpoint that this entire administration, and all their hangers-on can fair well hand in their resignations. Only gross irresponsibility and incompetence could have allowed things to transpire as they have, good riddance to all of em, democrat and republican alike. The ‘new dems’ got in office because people are sick and tired of the way this country’s been operated, tired of watching the daily bill for Iraq go up, up and up, while the offical mantra rotates between ‘growth’, ‘stay the course’, and ‘bullshit of the day___________(insert your bullshit here’.

Where are the thinkers, where are the watchdogs, where are the oversight people? Who was watching the till? These, and many other questions rise to the surface of many peoples’ thoughts upon watching the news, these days. When people that used to be considered far-left crackpots are now able to say ‘I told ya so’, and be accurate, you truly do have to wonder what the GOP’s been smoking for the last decade, or so. Maybe that’s a good topic to bring up. Would YOUR representatives pass a pee-test? Hmmm…..

Report this

By Lee, February 20, 2007 at 9:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

He steals the election. He uses 9/11 to consolidate his agenda and stops at nothing to gain absolute power. He immediately places his foot on the neck of the opposition and never lets up. He drains the treasury of this current and of future generations ensuring their future impoverishment. He shows no mercy and takes no prisoners and never has. Mr. Bush’s agenda of grabbing everything nailed down or not has never varied from the first day he was elected.

And throughout all of this, the Democrats act befuddled, dismayed and at a loss to determine what’s going on. They continue to explore “reason” and compromise and common ground when the Republican opposition never even feigned interest in a common goal. The Democrats win a resounding victory and the Bush White House proves as it has all along, that they’re going to do exactly what they want to do no matter who votes for whom or what the Constitution says. And still the Democrats wring their hands and shake their heads and act as if they just don’t understand. Perhaps they don’t. But gross ignorance is no excuse for complicity.

Report this

By John Lowell, February 20, 2007 at 8:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In his analysis of Representative Van Hollen’s comment that, “The refusal of the administration to try to work with others to resolve this in a responsible manner has created a very polarized atmosphere”, Dionne remarks:

“That should be the central theme of the president’s critics because it’s true—and because it offers the best rallying cry for those seeking to change a disastrous policy.”

Amazing. The best strategy for bringing about change in the Regime’s Middle Eastern policy is to assert that it just doesn’t want to get along? I’m not sure which of two reports I’ve read today
that inspires greater nausea, this of Dionne’s or the Nation’s that Obama just gave his endorsement
to the Likudist atrocity in Lebanon last Summer.

John Lowell

Report this

By rabblerowzer, February 20, 2007 at 5:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dictatorship by any other name, is still Dictatorship.

Sooner or later every group, club and organization develops an insider versus outsider mentality. For example, military versus civilians, employers versus employees, teachers versus students, cops versus citizens and congressmen versus voters. Competition within groups between individuals and factions is also intense, and cut-throat and backstabbing office politics is the rule, but when push come to shove, they unite for their own common interest. So in essence, what we have is an adversarial relationship between politicians and voters: their self-interest as opposed to our self-interest.

Take note that in the above examples one side has power and the other doesn’t. Our power to vote was superseded by the Supreme Court in 2000, and will stand as a precedent for all future elections.

Congress performs on a public stage and you can watch some of their machinations play out on c-span, but the really devious maneuvers happen backstage and after hours. Almost everything that effects national policy (their self-interest versus our self-interest) is now classified information. Since nearly everything is now Top Secret, it’s virtually impossible for us to learn when, why and what they are doing in their own self-interest as opposed to our self-interest.

Congress, the executive and judicial branch are the most exclusive power groups (or clubs) in America, and given the recent attacks and revocation of our most basic rights by all three branches of government, you have to wonder whether they ever give any consideration to our self-interest at all.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.