LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
July 4, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Age of Paine

Designer Vaginas: Is Female Circumcision Coming Out of the Closet?

Palin Will Step Down as Alaska's Governor

I Am Robama, and I Come in Peace

Soul Mate

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Age of Paine
 * NEW! * A Doctor in the House
The Battle Over the Burqa

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Mark A. Fischer on Joe Torre

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
America’s Child

America’s Child

By Susan Sherman
$11.70

more items

 
Reports

High Time for Voting Reform

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 12, 2007

By Marie Cocco

WASHINGTON—For those who despair that it’s way too early to start thinking about the 2008 presidential election—and who doesn’t?—there is a more productive way to spend political effort: Start working to ensure that the vote goes better in 2008 than it has in any election since the catastrophe of 2000.

Save for a single Florida congressional district—the one previously held, fittingly enough, by Katherine Harris—the 2006 congressional elections produced clear winners and losers, with relatively few allegations that machine malfunctions or partisan malfeasance changed the outcome. But that doesn’t mean there weren’t machine malfunctions, partisan malfeasance—and a certain chaotic quality to whole affair.

Touch-screen machines mysterious flipped voters’ choices or failed to record them at all, cards to activate the computers went missing, poll workers sometimes didn’t even know how to turn machines on. New identification requirements, and poll workers’ confused interpretations of them, vexed hundreds of would-be voters—including Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, who was turned away from the polls until he returned with identification bearing his home address.

“Around the country, the individual voting experience didn’t go well,’’ says Doug Chapin, director of electionline.org, a nonpartisan organization that tracks the performance of the voting system.

Help is on the way—from Florida, of all places.

Gov. Charlie Crist has proposed a $32.5-million plan to rid the state of the troublesome touch-screen voting systems its counties bought just a few short years ago. The machines once were billed as the solution to the horror of the hanging chad. They’ve turned out instead to be a horrific reminder that computers can, and sometimes do, malfunction; that they perform only as well as the people entrusted to operate them; and that the same doubts about security that make us think twice before feeding our credit card numbers into computers should make us think twice before entering our votes that way.

The dispute over the outcome in Florida’s 13th Congressional District centers on 18,000 voters in Sarasota County who used touch-screen machines but whose votes weren’t recorded in the race for Congress. Republican Vern Buchanan was certified the winner over Democrat Christine Jennings by a margin of just 369 votes.

Crist wants the touch-screen machines replaced by optical-scan devices—on which a voter records his or her choice by penciling in a circle, with the card then fed into a computer to be tallied—because that system provides a document that would be preserved for audits or recounts. The governor wants the new systems in place by November 2008, lest Florida again become the national poster child for electoral meltdown.

If Crist succeeds, he’ll deserve thanks just for letting us all set our sights on snafus and skullduggery in some other, yet-to-be-named state. Actually, he already deserves a pat on the back for a greater service. As the first leading Republican to take voting-system problems seriously, Crist may have begun to drain the toxic partisanship from the issue.

Since the debacle of 2000, Republicans as a group have determinedly scoffed at the idea that something is terribly wrong with our voting system. To acknowledge the obvious would be to cast doubt on the legitimacy of George W. Bush’s ascension to the presidency. Democrats climbed aboard the voting-reform bandwagon to do just that.

How stupid is this impasse? Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., first introduced legislation in 2003 to require all voting systems across the country to have a paper trail. By the end of the last congressional session—even with a majority of the House, including several Republicans, as co-sponsors—Holt’s proposal never was granted a hearing. He has reintroduced it now with Democrats in control of both chambers.

Machines aren’t the only problem with American elections—registration is typically cumbersome and the rules prone to partisan manipulation, new identification requirements in many states seem to be aimed more at keeping minority voters from the ballot box than preventing rare cases of voter fraud. In too many states, partisan officials decide pivotal election questions—there’s a whole new cast of Katherine Harrises waiting in the wings. Congress should at least ban elections administrators from actively campaigning for a political candidate.

With the 2008 campaign under way and so much needed reform undone, there would be no better way to usher out the Bush era than to usher in safeguards against the scandalous failures of the voting system that his election so thoroughly exposed.

Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at symbol)washpost.com.

TAGS:


Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: The Abortion Shuffle

Next item: Before the Invasion, There Was Feith


Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By PatrickHenry, March 7, 2007 at 7:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

If it were not for the electronic voting malfesance on the part of Republicans in this last election in Ohio and Florida, the outcome of the Presidential election would have been different.  With or without the help of Coulter.

Report this

By david, March 7, 2007 at 1:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

king love maywood come get u some igk gk gdk 26k mldk fuck the jungle

Report this

By Jeanine Molloff, February 15, 2007 at 3:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Here in my home state of Missouri; we have had the same problems with computerized voting.  Though optical scanners were made available; the voting public was not openly informed—you had to ask for the optical scanner on election day at your polling place.  The information was not provided otherwise.  Both political parties here, democrats and republicans were involved in forcing computerized voting on the public with no receipt.  Voters were not given the option of refusing this method.  Here’s what needs to happen: election boards must be forced to hold frequent open meetings any time a change like this is possible.  The meetings should be as long as needed to satisfy the public’s right to know.  Missouri is every bit as corrupt as Florida in this regard.  At my polling place, when I attempted to inform other voters that the optical scanner was available, and the computer votes provided no proof of your vote—I was threatened with arrest.  So much for democracy.  It’s time to demand our rights.  Never settle for less.

Report this

By KISS, February 14, 2007 at 6:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In the “70’s Jim and Ken Collier were writing and lecturing about ” Vote Scam, the Stealing of America”. No one was listening than…what about now? Please don’t just blame the repugs for this theft. Anyone remember Nixon being cheated out of the presidency under the daily machine of Chicago. Many a dead stiff voted for Kennedy. Oregon’s vote by mail seems to be the best method for honest voting. What is so sad is that it takes my fellow man to Wake up to what has been the norm for more than 35 years.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, February 14, 2007 at 6:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Diane, the number of votes “stolen” is made significant because most voters feel the minute differences between candidates makes going to the polls futile.  Our sick system of electing is symptomatic of a much larger problem.  We need to reform elections before we worry about votes being stolen.  Put up a candidate worth voting for, keep lobbyists away, and there will be so many votes it will be impossible to steal them all.

Report this

By NathanHale, February 14, 2007 at 5:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

An easy fix would be have these electronic machines give a paper reciept in the form of an official ballot.  Which then could be placed in a ballot box.  If an exit poll indicated a discrepancy of over lets say 5%, then break open the boxes and find out why.

Many have lost confidence due to the 2000 and 2004 elections.  Lets do away with the electorial college and vote system too.

Report this

By Diane Kappen, February 14, 2007 at 2:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

All the blogging in the world is not going to solve this important problem.  There is a movement afoot to educate and inflame us all into action aimed at effective election legislation.  Dorothy Fadiman, award winning director, is taking her latest documentary, “Stealing America, Vote by Vote” on the road.  She (with Steven Freeman—co-author of “Was the 2004 Election Stolen,” and Paul Lehto—prosecutor of voting fraud) will present the documentary and their expertise in Kansas City on Feb. 26 and 27.  Google them to find out if they are available to present their evidence in your town!

Report this

By Quy Tran, February 13, 2007 at 10:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Before reforming handicapped voting system we have to “rebuild” this handicapped President and his administration.

Report this

By Dale Headley, February 13, 2007 at 3:53 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In the 2006 elections, the Republican operatives who tried to fix elections in many places by intimidating potential Democratic voters, and by jury rigging the electronic machines, miscalculated the extent to which they would have to manipulate the process in order to control the outcome.  They won’t be so sanguine the next time around.  The next time, they’ll make sure that the numbers skew in their favor, no matter how blatantly they fail to jibe with the exit polls.  If something isn’t done in the meantime to make sure voting machines are secure from tampering, the Republicans will recapture the government at all levels.

Report this

By Jim, February 13, 2007 at 1:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Two things, since we are in the 21st century the information/electronic age, why not have a direct vote. 2nd: if all 3 branches of grovenment had term limits (2 four year terms)the people that we elect to serve us, would come closer to doing that than they do now.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, February 13, 2007 at 9:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I think you miss the mark, Marie.  For the next two years Americans will be subjected to hopefuls and their parties spending obscene amounts of money getting their empty messages out to voters which will ultimately result in business as usual in DC.  If we’re going to reform, let’s please start with the campaigning idiocy and then go from there.  For starters, I should think a week or two should be more than ample time to tell voters nothing.

Report this

By SamSnedegar, February 13, 2007 at 8:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

what makes you think that the bad guys can’t create a fake paper trail which will tell you that your vote went one way while the tabulation software gives out a different result? The way they cheat is to compromise the TABULATION software, AND short of a hand count of paper votes, what keeps the vote frauders from compromising the tabulation of votes over and over in the same equipment? If one could develop certified other counting equipment which would ALWAYS be used in any recount, then perhaps . . . but I doubt it . . . once you let the bad guys in on CREATING the vote machinery, you have opened the door and the horse is gone.

What people like the crooked Jeb Bush and whatshername (Katherine) Hairass did in Florida ought to make the world aware that there will never again be such a thing as a fair election anywhere. Ohio told us that in 2004, and no one paid any attention.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!





Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.