![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Why Bush’s Speech Didn’t MatterPosted on Jan 25, 2007By Joe Conason If America’s need for substantial leadership were not so grave, we might find some dark amusement in George W. Bush’s latest attempt to escape his own political quagmire. Sinking to Nixonian levels of public distrust and disdain in most polls, and facing a Democratic Congress, he tried to shift the focus to healthcare, climate change and educational reform in his annual address to Congress. As his presidency enters its twilight years, Bush evidently wishes he could revisit the sunny days of “compassionate conservatism,” when gauzy proposals and happy talk so easily beguiled so many voters. His problem is that we have heard all this before, and we know him too well by now. Every year in his State of the Union address, he feigns deep concern over the same issues. He always urges independence from foreign oil, rapid development of alternative energy sources, effective use of conservation and improvement of the environment. (Remember his “switch grass” biofuel program from last year?) He always promises to make affordable healthcare available to more of the uninsured and their children. The chances are that few, if any, of the proposals advertised in his speech will actually arrive on Capitol Hill as legislation—or that he will even bother to mention them again, unless he recycles the same ideas next year. They are really desperate cries for approval from a president who has permanently forfeited the popularity he once brandished like a weapon. His bigger problem, of course, is that he still refuses to face the failure of his military and diplomatic policies in Iraq—and the rejection of his escalation plan even by members of his own party. He seems to believe that he can buy off or distract the burgeoning opposition to the Iraq debacle by promising to deal with other issues “that people care about,” as his flacks would say. Today, however, there is no issue that people care about more than the war. And on the question of how to extricate us from the disaster that he and his administration have created, he simply has no credibility. When he claims that his critics have no alternative to his military escalation, they should refer him to the best-selling Iraq Study Group report, which outlines a highly specific plan for reconciliation, amnesty and negotiated withdrawal of U.S. forces. In this moment, as in so many others since Bush first took the oath of office, his distinguishing characteristic is the squandered opportunity. After 9/11, he could have brought the country together, and instead decided to aggrandize his party and his own power. He could have brought the world together to confront civilization’s enemies, from Osama bin Laden to Saddam Hussein, and chose instead to ruin traditional alliances in an aggressive, illegal and unnecessary war. Had he not made those stupid choices, and were he not blinded by his arrogance, then today he might be able to take advantage of crucial opportunities to improve the future of the United States and planet Earth. At no time in recent years, for instance, has there been such broad consensus, in the business community as well as the labor movement, and among citizens of all political persuasions, that we must reform the American healthcare system to contain costs and provide universal coverage. Both nationally and internationally, the same kind of consensus exists for strong measures to cope with global warming, as corporate executives sit down with environmental leaders. Yet the healthcare schemes floated by the president and his aides would achieve little except to damage the present system of employer coverage without building a viable replacement. That is why the advocates of universal care will scarcely bother to deconstruct the Bush plan, which was dead on arrival. As for his energy proposals, they are too little and too late, coming from a president who has so reliably behaved like a stooge for the oil and coal interests. He has consistently opposed substantial fuel-economy standards, and the White House has even expressed opposition to the modest House legislation that cuts the ridiculous subsidies to the oil industry and redirects the funding to renewable energy. When Bush was truly popular, the horizons for achievement seemed almost limitless. Now that he is truly scorned, his possibilities seem nil. How silly and how sad that he still expects us to believe him. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
Copyright 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.
Previous item: The World Agrees: Stop Him Next item: Yet Another Actor Acting Out Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Skruff, January 28, 2007 at 3:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Comment #49909 by Margaret Currey on 1/26 at 1:49 pm says:
“THEY HAVE MONEY AND THEY THINK MONEY CAN BUY ANYTHING THEY WANT.”
It can… They bought the presidency, the votes of half the US voters, and like it or not, they also bought the Democratic party which as DLCers is a wholly owned subsidiary of the RNC.
The interlocking Board of Directors includes Joe Biden, Tom Allen, Mike Michaud, Bob Graham, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and the rest of the Traitors who (out of fear, and/or opportunitism) supported the president in his reckless endevors
Report thisBy Margaret Currey, January 26, 2007 at 1:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I would say Bu$H just wants to stay in Iraq because that is were the oil is and Bush and Chaney if not nothing else are oil men, they just want to rape this country, make the middle class slaves to our system the captalist system, where greed is good, and How can you have a country that is concerned about global warming when the underlying system is greed is good, I say these two neocons should be IMPEACHED, HEAR ME THESE NEOCONS SHOULD BE IMPEACHED, BECAUSE THEY WILL LISTEN TO NO ONE, THEY HAVE MONEY AND THEY THINK MONEY CAN BUY ANYTHING THEY WANT.
Margaret from Vancouver, Washington
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, January 26, 2007 at 12:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I would like to share yours truly’s optimism (#49784) that, with Bush out of the way, ratification of our membership in the International Criminal Court of Justice will be a slam dunk; but I doubt that it will play out that way. I tend to share Christopher Hitchens’ opinion that the main reason we have distanced ourselves from any institution of international justice has to do with saving Kissinger’s ass. If that is the case, than I suspect that Henry holds too many markers for either the Executive of the Legislative branches to enable ratification. If Bush is to be tried on criminal charges, it will have to be within our own justice system.
Report thisBy yours truly, January 25, 2007 at 10:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nothing he says matters.now because he’s a goner the moment Congress cuts off all funding for the Iraq war, since that’ll start the wheel turning towards his impeachment, whereupon off he’s carted to the International Court of Criminal Justice, there to be tried for his crimes against humanity. And if all this doesn’t make him a goner then there’s no such thing.
Report thisBy Chaseme, January 25, 2007 at 8:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m with Christopher, when was it that bush was popular? Only during the theft of the first election was bush getting Attention.
Popularity- the quality of being well liked or common. Popularity figures are an important part of many people’s personal value systems, and forms a vital component of success in people-oriented fields.
You see, bush has never been popular, he simply has our Attention, the same way a two year old may require Attention from their parents as their curiosity is drawn to the electrical outlets.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, January 25, 2007 at 1:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
What need has civilization of “enemies,” Joe, when its most ardent adherents themselves go so systematically about the bloody business of destroying the very living arrangement here out of which the material appurtenances of civilization have been extracted, and apart from which the civilized nations themselves cannot go on living? Even the neoCONS don’t try to pass-off their pipedream as “the clash” of civilization vs. us surviving primitive savages.
Civilization is a condition, Joe. Or more accurately, it’s a process leading inexorably to the very condition your condition is in today......call it thoroughly domesticated. Trying to turn it into some kind of glorious cause only deepens the delusions that got you into it in the first place. Bush and Bin Laden are both about as civilized as it’s possible to get........driven by ideological extremism to wage war to-the-death against “unbelievers.”
Of course behind these useful idiots skulk the ever-present global casino operators who are only in it for the money. What do you suppose the shadowy and cold-blooded presences lurking back of even the bankers are in it for?
HokaHey!
Report thisBy Phred C Dobbs, January 25, 2007 at 11:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush, and his fellow Neocon hijackers-of-government, have joy ridden the country into a ditch and now we are truly struggling there like the “pathetic giant” that our enemies call us. Bush and the Neocons put us here for their own reasons which are not connected to any of the tenets of American democracy that any student learns in any American high school. They recklessly order our military into the meat gringder of tribal and religious warfare, (enabled if not engendered by us,) for their own reasons. Because it’s a way of implementing their hare-brained conservative world view, mainly. These people have to go. For God’s sake, somebody drive a stake in their political hearts so they won’t return.
Yes absolutely, they are endangering the planet. Inaction, enabled by industry sponsored individuals or groups, to stall efforts against global warming should henceforth be considered criminal. Cal Thomas finally got one right today when he said “The oil companies are making so much money that they have little interest in getting us to use alternatives to petroleum.” Duh! This has been the case since day one of the problem.
What I really want to know is where are our best and brightest? It’s not the Bush family, that’s for damned sure. We seem condemed to mediocre pols and worse.
Report thisBy Quy Tran, January 25, 2007 at 11:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
As soon as he finished his latest of the State of Union address I’ve seen very clearly a huge milestone at his grave. A beggar is always a beggar, no more no less !
Report thisBy Rodney Matthewsr, January 25, 2007 at 10:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The SOTU speech doesn’t matter because Bush no longer matters. He is seen as a lame duck because he on longer has any credibility with the American people. When people listen to Bush these days, they just listen for the next new lie or see if he repeats the same old lie. He is no longer respected by the majority of the American people and his constant barage of lies has cost America respect around the world. This failure of a man should do the right thing and resign with grace. That would at least give him a better legacy than the failure of a legacy he is currently left with. However Bush arrogance,stubbornace and ignorance doesn’t allow him to admit he did anything wrong. He would rather allow America to fall the same way the Roman Empire did than leave office and save this country finanically and morally.
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, January 25, 2007 at 10:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is where it is important that Webb through down the gauntlet. If the White House does not send any proposals to Capitol Hill, then it is up to Congress to “show the way.” THEN, it will be a question of whether or not the President is willing to make good on his words or just reach for his veto pen!
Report thisBy dick, January 25, 2007 at 9:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The plan, for mayhem in the middle east, is working, just as Israel wanted. The plan has been in print, twice, and is on the web. See “Securing the Realm”, written for Israel by the same folks who now control Bush, and talked him into the “surge”. These folks also rewrote the plan as “Project for the New American Century”. Not to worry, everything is going according to plan.
Report thisBy Christopher Cuttance, January 25, 2007 at 8:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Joe Conaston begins his last paragraph with the words ‘When Bush was truly popular...’ When was that exactly? I must have missed it.
Report thisBy DennisD, January 25, 2007 at 7:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The ability to raise large amounts of money almost guarantees their party’s nomination for a candidate. Few if any voters ask what these people have previously accomplished in their lives or careers. Far too many voters are more than willing to accept the empty rhetoric these clowns spew out on a daily basis. And then we wonder what went wrong.
Report thisBu$h isn’t doing anything different now compared to what he’s done in the past. His life has been an open book. Too few voters took the time to read it. I hope it’s different in 08.
By buffalo dude, January 25, 2007 at 2:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
THIS ARTICLE is just EXCELLENT ; however very sad to read & grasp when you realize how sad the leadership of BUSH is & the ARROGANCE this IDIOT has ! it’s a sad day in AMERICA when we invade SOVERIGN countries MAKE a MESS , our men are dying in a war that can’t be won , and we claim we want to bring them DEMOCRACY - we don’t have it either !distraction and a SHELL GAME are whats going on ! i just want to PUKE !
Report this