![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Worse Than ApartheidPosted on Dec 18, 2006
By Chris Hedges Israel has spent the last five months unleashing missiles, attack helicopters and jet fighters over the densely packed concrete hovels in the Gaza Strip. The Israeli army has made numerous deadly incursions, and some 500 people, nearly all civilians, have been killed and 1,600 more wounded. Israel has rounded up hundreds of Palestinians, destroyed Gaza’s infrastructure, including its electrical power system and key roads and bridges, carried out huge land confiscations, demolished homes and plunged families into a crisis that has caused widespread poverty and malnutrition. Civil society itself—and this appears to be part of the Israeli plan—is unraveling. Hamas and Fatah factions battle in the streets, despite a tenuous cease-fire, threatening civil war. And the governing Palestinian movement, Hamas, has said it will boycott early elections called by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, done with the blessing of the West in a bid to toss Hamas out of power. (Remember that Hamas, despite its repugnant politics, was democratically elected.) In recent days armed groups loyal to Abbas have seized Hamas-run ministries in what looks like a coup. The stark reality of Gaza, however, has failed to penetrate the consciousness of most Americans, who, when they notice the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, prefer to debate the merits of the word “apartheid” in former President Jimmy Carter’s new book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” It is a sad commentary on the gutlessness of the U.S. press and the timidity of the Democratic opposition that most Americans are not aware of the catastrophic humanitarian crisis they bear so much responsibility in creating. Palestinians are not only dying, their olive trees uprooted, their farmland and homes destroyed and their aquifers taken away from them, but on many days they can’t move because of Israeli “closures” that make basic tasks, like buying food and going to the hospital, nearly impossible. These Palestinians, after decades of repression, cannot return to land from which they were expelled. The 140-plus U.N. votes to censure Israel and two Security Council resolutions—both vetoed by the United States—are blithly ignored. Is it any wonder that the Palestinians, gasping for air, rebel as the walls close in around them, as their children go hungry and as the Israelis turn up the violence? Palestinians in Gaza live encased in a squalid, overcrowded ghetto, surrounded by the Israeli military and a massive electric fence, unable to leave or enter the strip and under daily assault. The word “apartheid,” given the wanton violence employed against the Palestinians, is tepid. This is more than apartheid. The concerted Israeli attempts to orchestrate a breakdown in law and order, to foster chaos and rampant deprivation, are on public display in the streets of Gaza City, where Palestinians walk past the rubble of the Palestinian Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Economy, the office of the Palestinian prime minister and a number of educational institutions that have been bombed by Israeli jets. The electricity generation plant, providing 45 percent of the electricity of the Gaza Strip, has been wiped out, and even the primitive electricity networks and transmitters that remain have been repeatedly bombed. Six bridges linking Gaza City with the central Gaza Strip have been blown up and main arteries cratered into obliteration. And the West Bank is rapidly descending into a crisis of Gaza proportions. The juxtaposition of what is happening in Gaza and what is being debated on the U.S. airwaves about a book that is little more than a basic primer on the conflict reinforces the impression most outside our gates have of Americans living in a distorted, bizarre reality of our own creation. What do Israel and Washington believe they will gain by turning Gaza and the West Bank into a miniature version of Iraq? How do they think people who are desperate, deprived of hope, dignity and a way to make a living, under attack from one of the most technologically advanced armies on the planet, will respond? Do they believe that creating a Hobbesian nightmare for the Palestinians will blunt terrorism, curb suicide attacks and foster peace? Do they not see that the rest of the Middle East watches the slaughter in horror and rage—its angry, disenfranchised young men and women determined to overcome feelings of impotence and humiliation, even at the cost of their own lives? And perhaps they do see and understand all this. Israel and Washington probably do get the recruiting value of this repression for Islamic militants. But these Israeli attacks, despite the rage and violence they breed against Israelis and against us, also create conditions so intolerable that Palestinians can no longer reside on their land. More than 160,000 civil servants have not received full salaries for almost nine months. These government employees support families that number more than a million Palestinians. And a United Nations report states that more than two-thirds of Palestinians are now living below the poverty line. The unemployment rate is more than 50 percent. The Palestinian Foreign Ministry says 10,000 Palestinians have emigrated in the last four months and almost 50,000 others have applied to leave. Israel, with no restraints from Washington, despite the Iraq Study Group report recommendations that the peace process be resurrected from the dead, has been given the moral license by the Bush administration to carry out what is euphemistically in Israel called “transfer” and what in other parts of the world is called ethnic cleansing. Faced with a demographic time bomb, knowing that by 2020 Jews will make up only 40 to 46 percent of the overall population of Israel, the architects of transfer, who once held the equivalent status in Israeli society of the Ku Klux Klan, have wormed their way into positions of power in the Israeli government.
Washington and Israel, I suspect, know the cost of this repression. But it is beginning to appear as though they accept it—as the price for ridding themselves of the Palestinians.
The debate over Jimmy Carter’s book, one that dishes up a fair number of Israeli myths about itself and states a reality that is acknowledged even by most Israelis, misses the point. The question is not whether Israel practices apartheid. Apartheid is a fond dream for most Palestinians. The awful question is rather will Israel be able to unleash a policy so draconian and cruel that it will obliterate a community that has lived on this land for centuries. There are other, far more loaded words for what is happening to the Palestinians. One shudders to repeat them. But unchecked, unstopped, the current wave of violence and abuse meted out to the Palestinians will echo down the corridors of history as one of the greatest moral and tactical blunders of the early part of this century, one that will boomerang on Israel and on us, bringing to our own doorsteps the evil we have allowed to be delivered to the narrow alleys and refugee camps in Gaza. When it was only apartheid, we had some hope. Previous item: Truthdigger of the Week: Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift Next item: E.J. Dionne Jr.: No More NASCAR Fakers Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
«1 2
3
By Tim, December 19, 2006 at 3:57 am # Facts
By NoMoreLeftistMuslimLies, December 19, 2006 at 12:40 am # Perhaps the Gazans should ask Suha Arafat to return some of the $3.5 Billion stolen from international funding sent to the Palestinian Authority during the time of Yassir Arafat’s rule. Or look into the mirror and ask why they consider killing Jews and electing Hamas to be the answer to their personal problems. They have no more excuse to blame the Jews for their miserable condition than did a citizen of Koln, Berlin, Tokyo or Hiroshima in 1943, for what lay ahead. Happy enough to commit mass-murder themselves, for their “God-Kings”, happy to engage in slavery and raw conquest of others, bringing mass-misery to so many, happy to be participants in hysterical mass-psychological movements which put themselves up as Supreme Beings, with all others as inferiors, the Palestinian populations of Gaza and the West Bank are little different in this respect. They daily drink in litres of Jew-hatred propaganda and revisionist history from government TV and radio, procliaming themselves as the only legitimate ones, describing the Jews and Americans as Satan’s Spawn who drinks the blood of Muslims, their social construct so sex-repressive and inherently violent they descend into the historical dark ages even to the point of strapping bombs on their own children. And then celebrating their obliteration, much as they also celebrated wildly in the streets, with hysterical cheering and uulating when news of 9-11 reached “Palestine”. The only errors the West has made, is to give these people anything in the way of relief or assistance, and to not recognize how Muslim governments and the mullah-mosque systems are major organizers of this dark emotional plague which leads them towards Jihad violence against the unbelievers—whether Jew in Israel, Hindu in India, Christian in Lebanon, Animist in Darfur, it does not matter, they are all inferiors who should be wiped away to make room for Muslims. 1400 years of this lie, about the “religion of peace”, which the Western Leftists also promote if only to gain more votes for their candidates, who bend over to kiss the Muslim foot, no matter what barbaric atrocities they commit. And Gaza is not unique—just go to any Muslim-dominated nation and you will see similar poverty conditions, resultant from similar crooked leaders, including massive butchery even of Muslims killing fellow Muslims, as in Algeria, Syria, Sudan, and now Iraq.
By Jonathan - New Zealand, December 19, 2006 at 12:20 am # It is refreshing to read such raw assessments of life in Gaza from a senior American journalist. As someone who follows the US press and opinion online and through internet radio it always amazes me what a taboo subject Israels policies in the occupied territories are. For example I listened to a Bill Maher podcast last week and after all the withering and extremely funny attacks on Bush et al came an interview with Benjamin Netanyahu! I thought it was a joke at first, but no and there followed an extremely soft cosy chat with the extreme right wing former Israeli PM. If him who is next - why not Cheney or Rumsfeld as well? They are part of the same problem. Democrats seems to be the most terrified of all to address these issues so I admire Jimmy Carter all the more for his timely book. The “anti-semitism” comment expressed above is cheap lazy and absurd. For some people I wonder if there is anything that Israel can ever do that could ever be wrong. As Jimmy Carter himself has pointed out these issues are lively debates within Israel itself.
By R., December 18, 2006 at 11:10 pm # Since Day One of Israel’s existence, its leadership has tirelessly worked with two major foreign policy goals. The first goal is to break Arab states into smaller and smaller pieces and promote sectarian violence in these states. The famous plan for a Christian state in Lebanon and its successful instigation of the 1975-90 war is part of this. The other has been to draw the US and the Arab world into war and promote mutual hatred between the two. The second goal has been a smashing success. At first, they were caught doing such things as bombing US targets in Egypt in 1954 to sabotage talks between the two countries, though Israel was never punished for this and this has never been publicised in the US, much like the 1967 attack of the USS Liberty and its lifeboats. Then, with the help of AIPAC and the rise of the neocon movement, Israeli agents penetrated the US government. A huge victory for them was the rise of Ronald Reagan, bringing neocons into power for the first time. With it came the green light for the 1982 invasion of Lebanon and the sending of US Marines into Lebanon to relieve the Israeli occupation forces. Palestinians subject to an American security guarantee were slaughtered under Israeli supervision. The Marines then waged war on behalf of a Lebanese government installed by Israel. This led to the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, which of course led to cries of revenge against all Arabs from the United States. Later, on April 1 1990, Saddam Hussein said “If they attack us, fire will eat half of Israel”. As a result, US media speculated on a war on Iraq to disarm it of what became to be known as WMDs, to preserve Israel’s regional monopoly. Conveniently, a dispute between Iraq and Kuwait led to the events of August 1990, which was used as an excuse by the US to destroy that country through bombing and to maintain a draconian sanctions regime in the name of preserving Israel’s regional WMD monopoly. 500,000 children dead later, and Madeleine Albright said “It was worth it”. For Israel, it certainly is for US government officials. With these crimes committed with Israel and for Israel, including the Qana massacre which Albright responded to by firing the UN Secretary General who dared allow a report blaming Israel be published (So Annan knows why he got his job), the Arab world saw this and there was lots of anger. Repressive regimes were bribed by the US into collaborating with Israel. The Oslo process was a cruel, cruel exercise in US-Israeli sadism. Clinton staffed his Israel-Palestine team with Israel lobbyists. Then there was the betrayal of Yasser Arafat; promised he would not be blamed for any failure at Camp David, he was stabbed in the back, supposedly because Bill wanted to help Hillary for her Senate bid. After the failure of Camp David, over 300 unarmed Palestinians were massacred and the media justified this on the grounds that the “generous offer” had been turned down and that a “lynching” of suspected death squad operatives happened. These 300 were murdered by the Israelis before the first suicide bomber crossed into Israel during the Al-Aqsa Intefada. Clinton responded to the murders by sending weapons to help commit more murders. These murders were advertised in May 2000 before the Camp David meetings by the Israelis, they announced their plans to use helicopter gunships, tanks and live ammunition against expected protests. So all these crimes later, something happened on September 11 2001. What did Benjamin Netanyahu say? “It’s very good”. It sure was for him. It was the culmination of his country’s policy for the past fifty years.
By gringo, December 18, 2006 at 10:47 pm # Well, since the palestinian arabs (Hamas) do not recognize Israel, openly claim their goal is destruction of Israel, since they conduct terrorist war against Israel - the result is obvious: Israel is forced to defend herself. Anyway, so far all arab parties in Judea, Samaria and Gaza openly claim that they need Jew-free territories. Are they closer related to the KKK than the Israel government? Moreover, would the author be satisfied if Israel treated the arab israelis in the same exact manner as jews are treated in Judea, Samaria and Gaza? And if not, why not?
By Stephen Lewis, December 18, 2006 at 10:10 pm # Chris Hedges themes, views and voice should be shared with a much larger audience than merely this site. Since his work, “War is a Force....” was published, Hedges has been a most distinctive and insightful voice, counter balancing the bravado and hubris offered by many that trumpet war as a main means of moral victory. For generations, many segments of the Israeli community have offered themselves as offshoots of an oppressed society. But quickly - in this past decade - and in a ramped up manner in the past couple of years, the Israeli military muscle in a paradoxical twist have made themselves into onery oppressors - in so many circumstances. While many in the Palestinian community are likewise complicit in in the deadly havoc that continues to wrack this country, there must be many that dream of peace and a moral society where folk embrace rather than engage in reckless depravity. Innocence betrayed as woman and children are blown assunder. Israeli society - in all corners - should pay greater attention and American political leaders balance views before this conflict grows into a greater ominous storm.
By Ralph, December 18, 2006 at 10:06 pm # Ironic that it was a Elie Weisel, a Jew, who said: ‘The opposite of love is not hate, it is indifference.’ Israel has become that which they hated.
By a voice from the wilderness, December 18, 2006 at 10:05 pm # Torture, kidnappings, targeted assassinations, gulags, walls along our borders in the name of “national security”—have we been taking lessons from the Israelis? I’m ashamed to be an American we’ve strayed so very far from our ideals.
By Don, December 18, 2006 at 9:46 pm # Chris Hedges’ brutally honest appraisal of the Palestinians’ humanitarian crisis sounds a powerful alarm bell that desperately needs to be heard. I agree with every word he says, except for his criticisms of Jimmy Carter and his book. The story of Israel’s destructive intentions and the misery wrought on the Palestinians has been known for a very long time. If Carter had titled his book, “Palestine Humanitarian Crisis”, it probable raised as many yawns as one called “Darfur Humanitarian Crisis”. We can see that he must have done something right in deliberately using the word “apartheid” by the way he’s being roasted. By invoking the comparison with South Africa, and the sub-text of our own tortured racial history, he has scorched a lot of raw nerves (some of the reviews are vicious and ugly), exactly what was needed. Meanwhile, those who are provoked into reading the book will find one of the most convoluted and intricate conflicts in human history laid out calmly and succinctly in plain English. My revered Zionist grandmother led me to believe in the Israeli cause. In the 1940s, we went to the theater and stood and cheered and wept as the curtain came down on “A Star is Born” as Paul Muni raised the new flag and somberly led the Jewish people into the nascent State of Israel. We watched the newsreels of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians snaking their way through the desert as they were forced out of the country. “They’re dirty, ignorant nomads who had no right to be there in the first place,” she would tell me. But in 1971 I spent six months in Israel. The history, I learned, was far more more complicated and a lot less favorable to the Israelis than my grandmother let on. The origins and practices of Colonial Zionism were not pretty. I met ordinary Palestinians who were quite intelligent and decent, just as I met of lot of dovish Israelis who also were kindly and well-intentioned. But I also saw that the Labor Party was in decline, the right was on the rise, and their supporters were arrogant, truculent, militaristic, and intensely antagonistic toward the Palestinians. The future looked grim—in 1971! Many Likud followers told me that Israel could get whatever they wanted from the U.S. because they had us a over barrel, a barrel of oil: amidst the Cold War, they were our bastion against Russian expansionism in the Middle East. It was hard not to laugh in their faces. But who would ever have imagined that 35 years later, for different reasons, that Israel, through AIPAC, other lobbies and agencies, and sheer political clout could have the lock grip that it does on American-Israeli policies. This to the point that anyone who dares to challenge their policies is immediately attacked as an anti-Semite, a coddler of terrorists, and worse—the way Jimmy Carter is now under assault. The former president and Chris Hedges make excellent cases. Both of their perspectives are needed. I for one welcome both. Don
By Charles J., December 18, 2006 at 9:23 pm # If possible, worse than Israeli government policy has been U.S. policy, as OUR government has aided and abetted (with the consent of the governed--fed the “facts” by grossly biased media that grants seemingly infinite time to AIPAC spokespersons, while merely pretending to fairness in giving a few brief moments to Ereket or Ashwari, both of whom are invariably interrogated as to suicide bombers, noticeably, by the way, absent since Hamas won elections)--to the tune of billions of dollars per annum, along with supplying of advanced weapons systems. Obscenity that Israeli government policy has been and remains, U.S. policy has been and remains yet more loathe-some. I agree re reaction to Carter’s (fairly tepid) new book. I’ve been wondering where, exactly, was he when he held the reins of power? No doubt, same place he was when the issues were Salvadoran and Nicaraguan revolutions. Seems the more things change, the more they remain the same: European settlers lately arrived in the “New World” pursued the same policy toward indigenous peoples, deemed so much “shrubbery” to be mowed down or banished--naturally, in the name of security, or “taming” the savage beast--bringing religion and democracy to the uncivilized. “Land grab” was never mentioned in officialdom. My own opinion, as white, male, European descendent, is that the “uncivilized” had a good deal to teach Europeans about civilized behavior. I suppose that if the Palestinians get “lucky,” they’ll wind up no “worse off” than Navajo, Cherokee, Seminole, Sioux--every tribe, every nation--at least those yet extent. Even the U.S. government didn’t construct a wall, but then, so thorough was genocide no wall was even contemplated, far as I know. Perhaps one day, Israel will be able to tear theirs down, once Palestinians have been so reduced in number and/or banished to nether regions (places where there is no water, no arable land, etc.), they will attain the status of a people to be pitied, to be granted charity, not least by the oh-so-very “decent” people who destroyed them--in the name of some goddamn ideology or other, that is, in the interests of power and wealth. Thanks to Hedges for NON-fiction, the very best piece I’ve read at Truthdig.
By malcolmartin, December 18, 2006 at 9:13 pm # One of the more graphic illustrations of the capitalist system’s growing irrationality is now being painted by one of its forward outposts—Israel. As Chris Hedges so richly describes, the state that Zionism created now clearly senses it’s mortality and is thrashing around accordingly. The guardians of the state are clearly in the grip of fear and uncertainty. The recent indiscriminate bombings in Lebanon and Gaza and the resultant killing of civilians and destruction of infrastructure, the kidnapping of Hamas legislators, the targeting of a U.N. observer post, and the outrage on Qana were desperate acts. Each farther outside the bounds of common sense than the one before. Completely out of the blue on repeated occasions and in leaflets dropped on the Lebanese, Israeli leaders have felt compelled to mention their power to erase Lebanon from the planet. The Israelis are blustering past the graveyard and their bully’s trepidation is bound to grow now that their adventure has gone badly. Prime Minister Olmert and his security cabinet moved in fits and starts. When the Israeli military’s nose was bloodied at Bint Jbail, they gave up on the idea of driving to the Litani River to establish their so-called buffer zone. Then the security cabinet realized the electrifying effect of this turn on the Arab people and they poured troops across the border. Even as they veered back to their original plan, deep down they knew that militarily speaking, only a Pyrrhic victory was available against Hizbollah. One thing the Israeli assault on the Gaza and Lebanon has made clearer is the alignment of forces in the Arab and Muslim world. Ironically, in different fashions both Hamas and Hizbollah were creations of Israel. Hamas was supposed to act as a counterweight to the Palestine Liberation Organization when Israel considered the PLO the most immediate threat to their domination of the Arab majority. Hizbollah filled the gapping chasm Israel created with the 1982 invasion and years long occupation of southern Lebanon. Both Hamas and Hizbollah have, through years of disciplined work and organizing, woven themselves into the lives of the respective peoples they seek to liberate. What a stark contrast with the rich Arab boys who have created the cult they call al-Qaeda. The clownish Ayman al-Zawahiri rushed to his camcorder after Hizbollah faced down the Israeli military to spout some silly rhetoric about a caliphate from Spain to Iraq in front of a poster that screams, “Please remember us, we did 9/11!” Under normal circumstances the impending death of a form of racism like Zionism (see the picture of young Israeli girls writing messages and drawing on missile warheads soon to rain down on Lebanon) and the establishment of a secular state on the territory Israel now occupies where Palestinian Arabs of various religious persuasions and Jews could peacefully co-exist as equals would be cause for human celebration. Unfortunately, the panic that clearly grips Israel means they will likely join in U.S. attacks on Damascus and Tehran and resort to the use of their nuclear arsenal when all else fails. And that, on a larger scale, is the dilemma that the whole world faces as the capitalist system spearheaded by the United States begins experiencing it’s last gasps.
By Andrew, December 18, 2006 at 8:46 pm # What does anyone expect. The Palestinians vote for Hamas, who’s prime purpose is the destruction of Israel, the killing of Jewish people, and it’s expected that the Palestinians will be handled with kid gloves? Maybe the Palestinians are fighting amongst themselves because they realized they screwed up in their last election and would like new leadership that is willing to recognize the right of Israel to exist so that the poor Palestinians (you know, the ones that institutionally learn from grade school on to hate Jews) can have some hope of a prospect of peace and survival. I do feel sad for the Palestinians as I’m sure that a good percentage are victims of their own institutionalized hatred towards their neighbors. Reading Chris Hedges makes me feel sad for the people caught in this vice. But, the Jewish people are sick of suicide attacks and so built their wall to restrict movement of the AK47/rochet launcher/suicide vest toting demagogues. They’re sick of being attacked and so are using a heavy hand to deal with those who would be their enemy. Who can blame them? If it’s causing upheaval within the Palestinian governemnt, maybe it is sound strategy. I would never have guesed it was a sound strategy, but apparently Israel is leaning more towards Clausewitz and Machiavelli since Bush went preemptive and the strides of US presidents towards Middle East peace over the last 24 years were thrown in the dumppster. It’s a bad situation, but what do you expect? Kid gloves?
By Lefty, December 18, 2006 at 7:47 pm # As I understand it, Israel was created primarily as a refuge for homeless Holocaust survivors following the attempted genocide in Europe. Israel has been under attack - for its survival - ever since then. I can’t understand why Israel should not be able to defend itself. It seems obvious to me that when the Palestinians stop firing rockets into Israel, and stop sending suicide bombers into Israel, both targeting unarmed civilians, Israel will no longer have to defend itself against them.
By kh, December 18, 2006 at 7:46 pm # Having been to Gaza myself and witnessed the horrors that result from the Israeli and American policies, I thank you for having the guts to say it like it is.
By Biff Loman, December 18, 2006 at 7:33 pm # I appreciate everything Chris Hedges said in his article, “Worse Than Apartheid.” It appears that finally a bit of reality is seeping into the American consciousness. What is going on in occupied Palestine is barbaric, cruel, and with malice aforethought. But in my mind what makes the unrelenting Israeli assault on the Palestinians even more cruel is its deliberate intentionality. Everything done by the Israeli occupiers is carefully thought out and carefully implemented for maximum effect. In fact, the Israeli Supreme Court last week ruled that assassinations of Palestinian political leaders is “legal,” and that is has no problem with Israeli death squads, which freely roam Gaza and the West Bank looking for those on their lists or just targets of opportunity. Everything, the checkpoints, the home demolitions, the routine atrocities, the land confiscations, the theft of water, and theft of even more Palestinian land by the Hate Wall, the theft of Jerusalem, all of it is so methodical, so well constructed, so merciless. Yes, it’s worse than apartheid by a long-shot, that’s why a more accurate term would be slow-moving genocide.
By ib, December 18, 2006 at 7:15 pm # What Carter and Hedges are voicing is the truth. I applaud them both for having the courage to state what the rest of the world knows to be a fact.
By Quy Tran, December 18, 2006 at 6:19 pm # Human beings cannot live in peace with ferocious animals with human masks. President Carter and Mr. Gibson were absolutely right when denouncing these animals. King George only knows how to bow and knee down in front those wild beasts.
By Roger Drowne EC, December 18, 2006 at 6:18 pm # “ TO HELL… WITH WAR “ Earth Citizens Unite… NOW Stand Up, Get Up, Jump Up and STOP the KILLING ALL AROUND OUR EARTH This Is No Way To . Operate . Planet . Earth . E.C.s At This or ANY ( Christmas ) Season . “ 4 Christ Sake “ . END THIS B.S. NOW “ IMPEACH and JAIL the BUSH GANGSTERS… NOW Now Thank U, Roger Drowne EC another, Earth Citizen Also… RUNNING 4 PRESIDENT of Earth GO C… Some ideas about how to spend time on earth… In OUR World… WITH-OUT WAR at… ALSO… Start Tonight, Create Earth Ball Homes and Earth Ball Green Houses… In 2 Years or Less, 4 All EC.s In Need All Over OUR Earth
By Eleanore Kjellberg, December 18, 2006 at 6:09 pm # “Smuggling began at the very moment that residence was established; its inhabitants were forced to live on 180 grams of bread a day, 220 grams of sugar a month, 1 kg. of jam and 1 kg. of honey, etc. It was calculated that the officially supplied rations did not cover even 10 percent of the normal requirements. If one had wanted really to restrict oneself to the official rations then the entire population of the ghetto would have had to die of hunger in a very short time.... The authorities did everything to seal off the ghetto hermetically and not to allow in a single gram of food. A wall was put up around the ghetto on all sides that did not leave a single millimeter of open space.... They fixed barbed wire and broken glass to the top of the wall. When that failed to help, they were ordered to make the wall higher, at their own expense, of course.... Several kinds of guards were appointed for the walls and the passages through them; the categories of guards were constantly being changed and their numbers increased. The walls were guarded by the military together with the police; at the ghetto wall there were police ..They employed sharply repressive measures to stop the smuggling. Several times smugglers were shot at the central lock-up. Once there was a veritable slaughter (100 persons were shot). Among the victims of the smuggling there were tens of children between 5 and 6 years old, whom the killers shot in great numbers near the passages and at the walls.... And despite that, without paying attention to the victims, the smuggling never stopped for a moment. When the street was still SLIPPERY WITH BLOOD that had been spilled, other smugglers already set out, as soon as the “candles” had signaled that the way was clear, to carry on with the work....” How sad, the above was entitled “Life in the Warsaw Ghetto, by Emanuel Ringelblum—-is it too trite to say that history continually repeats itself again and again—-have we learned no lessons from the past. How did we become the Enemy we so intensely reviled?
By Kingcob Bob IV, December 18, 2006 at 5:26 pm # They used to teach us in political science that nothing’s worse than apartheid.
By AverageJoe, December 18, 2006 at 5:14 pm # I don’t see Europe, China, Russia, or any Asian nations intervening on behalf of the Palestinians. Why are the Israelis given free reign to do what they will? BECAUSE THEY CAN! This situation should be handled by the UN and yet, all we get out of the UN is a bunch of empty rhetoric. Just what exactly are these UN employees doing for their over inflated salaries? I bet the average lunch tab for a UN delegate would feed a family in Darfur for a week. Get with it people. No one gives a damn! We live in a sad, sad world.
By Byron, December 18, 2006 at 4:42 pm # In many ways, the creation of Israel was a mistake. As a Jew, I don’t believe the state of Israel has made my being a Jew any easier or made me feel any safer. In the United States, APAC has exerted a level of influence equivalent to the oil, gas and insurance lobbies. I agree with Carter. There is no dialogue about the plight of the Palestinian people in this country. Politicians automatically and uniequivocally throw their support behind Israel and don’t even question it. Makes sense since they receive so much monetary support from Jewish lobby groups. You don’t hear about American/Palestinian lobby groups in the United States. I haven’t anyway. The media sure doesn’t talk about them. And they sure has hell don’t command the level of influence that AIPAC does. The United States will never broker a peace in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians because it is a sole supporter of Israel. Its up to some other country to broker that peace. The U.S. wallows in Israeli blood money. The Arabs are no saints to be sure. But the Palestinians are suffering badly and since the Arabs themselves don’t want to stop it other than by annhilating Israel, its up to another country to broker a peace so we can have a two state solution materialize. But the United States is one of the worst perpetuators of the Palestinian tragedy. My tax dollars go to Israel to support this state of apartheid and it hurts me deeply.
By Speranza, December 18, 2006 at 4:38 pm # Israeli leadership is racist. A large portion of Israeli’s are racisct and in addition, they covet the entire West Bank and Gaza. They simply want the land and they want all Palestinians cleared out. One can make scores of arguments on either side, but this is the bottom line. Israel wants the land and they are intent on getting it. They have several justifications for every argument, all obfuscations that they do not even believe. But they have to hide their true intent. And that is that they are gong to steal the land and expel the palestinians. Robbery in broad daylight! And they have the termidity to say to the world that it is the fault of the Palestinins! They, the Israelis, the ceaselessly tell us, are the victims.
By tom dolan, December 18, 2006 at 4:25 pm # In his book The Seat of the Soul, Gary Zukav states that nations have their own karma. It must be difficult for nations in the Middle East to transcend their karmic burdens, rooted in tribe, religion and culture. Revenge-culture, the suppression of women, etc.—how can individuals buffeted by these powerful currents make loving, spirit-filled decisions?
By John, December 18, 2006 at 3:48 pm # I just read Jimmy Carter’s book, which I bought after seeing the attacks upon his person, his character, and his leadership. The taunting challenge to debate Alan Dershewitz was particularly offensive considering the desparity in the character between the two men. On one side of the proposed debate is a man who selflessly dedicates his life to humanitarian purpose, such as Habitat for Humanity, while the other is a man who has prostituted his profession in the defense of the super rich, without regard for conscience: OJ Simpson and Claus Von Bulow. Jimmy Carter possesses a quality unknown to his attackers: character. There could be no debate because while both men might mouth the same words, they speak a different language.
By Kellina, December 18, 2006 at 3:25 pm # what Israel is doing to the Palestinians . . . is called “genocide.” Not apartheid. Not ethnic cleansing.
By Anne M, December 18, 2006 at 3:16 pm # The truths Hedges expresses are painfully accurate and extremely important. Although difficult to do, let us try to spread these seeds of enlightenment.
By felicity, December 18, 2006 at 2:46 pm # I have read of this tragedy and have commented when relevant realizing that a torrent of anti-semitic slurs against me will follow. Seldom, if ever have I been mistaken. It’s rather like the invectives thrown at those who criticize the Bush Administration’s policies. We’re fascistic, terrorist-loving, America-hating traitors. As we long as name-calling is seen as a productive reply to criticism, the wrong-headed policies of either government will not be addressed.
By Hank, December 18, 2006 at 2:27 pm # Thank you fir the blunt but true assessment of the situation in Palestine. Everything I have read on the situation in Palestine leads me to concur with this assessment. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article