![]() |
|
||
|
Jabari Asim: Here We Go AgainPosted on Dec 5, 2006By Jabari Asim WASHINGTON—Last week a friend left me a phone message about the shooting of Sean Bell in New York. “Here we go again,” he said. Bell, a 23-year-old New York deliveryman, was shot to death by police on Nov. 25, a few hours before his wedding. The details of his demise are likely familiar by now, but they still bear repeating. Undercover policemen fired 50 rounds at Bell’s car, thinking that he and his two companions were armed. As the world now knows, they weren’t. A few years ago, my friend and I worked together on a book project prompted by the 1999 shooting death of Amadou Diallo. A street vendor and immigrant from Guinea, Diallo died in a hail of 41 bullets from New York policemen who believed he had a gun. He didn’t. The tragically familiar circumstances led my friend to call me and share his feelings of deja vu. Kadiatou Diallo, the victim’s mother, apparently had a similar feeling. She attended Bell’s funeral on Dec. 1. “I think today, even though it’s painful for me, I want to be here,” she told reporters gathered outside. After hearing the details of Bell’s death, she said, “I knew then change had not happened as we wished.” Advertisement Speaking at Bell’s funeral, Sharpton declared, “We don’t hate cops. We don’t hate race. We hate wrong. There’s a difference between peace and quiet. Quiet means shut up. Quiet means suffer in silence. Peace means justice. We want peace, but we won’t get quiet until we get justice.” There have been changes in the mayor’s office, and they have been welcome and significant. Where Rudolph Giuliani often fanned the flames of unrest with his incendiary comments, his successor, Michael Bloomberg, has proceeded with compassion and tact. “I can tell you that it is to me unacceptable or inexplicable how you can have 50-odd shots fired, but that’s up to the investigation to find out what really happened,” Bloomberg said at a news conference shortly after Bell’s death. If that doesn’t sound like much, just imagine Giuliani in the same spot. When New York police fatally shot Patrick Dorismond, yet another unarmed black man, in 2000, Giuliani released Dorismond’s criminal record—including a juvenile offense—before the body was cold. Dorismond became the fourth unarmed black man shot by New York police in over a year. Like Diallo before him and Bell just recently, he became part of a long and heartbreaking tradition. A tradition, I should add, that has been acknowledged for decades. Following the fatal police shooting of 14-year-old Claude Reese Jr. in 1974, the New York Times noted “the profoundly depressing familiarity” of such deaths: “A white police officer responds to a call involving a black or Puerto Rican youth, a shot is fired, and the youngster dies. Later, though the stories are confusing, the police officer is said to have thought he saw a lethal weapon—a gun or a knife—in the dead youth’s hand. It turns out that the weapon cannot be found or is substantially more innocent than the officer thought it was when he discharged his gun.” Of course, that points to another change: The officers in such incidents are no longer exclusively white. Three of the five shooters in the Bell case were black or Latino. That distinction provides little comfort to men like me, who have sons the same age as Bell—and certainly offers no solace to Bell’s father himself. “I can’t repair this heart and what I’m going through right now. It’s broken too bad,” William Bell told a reporter. “It’s hard for anybody to lose their son—any parent. It’s just too much for a young man to be taken away from a life that’s happy. How do you explain that? “All the anger in the world will not bring him back. I just don’t want this to happen to no one else’s kid. No matter what color they are. Make sure that’s clear. Color has nothing to do with this. It’s the human being that got lost,’’ William Bell said. Meanwhile, the elder Bell, along with Sean Bell’s fiancee and everyone else who loved him, must wait and grieve through investigations and inquiries and maddening delays. My friend was right: Here we go again. Previous item: Rep. Dennis Kucinch: No More Money for War on Iraq Next item: Marie Cocco: Ignoring the Medicare Fiasco Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Ga, December 8, 2006 at 6:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Here are some quote from the New York Times. But as Frank shows, some people believe what they want to believe.
“On the other side, investigators know precisely how many bullets each of the five shooting officers fired: 31 from Detective Oliver; 11 from a detective working undercover; 4 by another officer; 3 by Officer Michael Carey; and 1 by the fifth officer, a detective.”
...
“But eyewitness testimony whether from the officers who fired, the victims, or others who may have seen the events unfold amid the fear, panic and fog-of-war frenzy that a hail of 50 bullets can bring is sometimes unreliable.”
...
“The two said that only they and Mr. Bell, who was 23, were in or near the car when the shooting erupted contradicting accounts from some officers involved that a fourth man was with the group and may have been armed.”
...
“Mr. Benefield and Mr. Guzman also said that the five police officers who opened fire on them did not identify themselves and that they had no idea that they were facing the police, Mr. Rubenstein said.”
...
“A person briefed on the account of that undercover detective has said that that detective got in front of Mr. Bells car, pulled out his gun and, with his police badge around his neck, identified himself as an officer.
That detective and the other officers fired after Mr. Bell drove into the detective and an unmarked police van, the police said. The officers suspected that one of the men had a gun, but no gun was later found, the police have said.”
...
“The witnesses also told prosecutors that they neither saw nor heard the officers identify themselves as police officers before the shooting. “Their eyewitness accounts flatly contradict critical assertions within the police version of what took place,” said the lawyer, Charlie King.”
[emphasis mine]
Report thisBy Ken, December 6, 2006 at 7:02 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Peace to the world the Lord is One !
Report thisLove one another as I have loved you !
Blessed are the humble !
Be Just for justices sake alone !
Can’t we all get along !
God Bless !
By Frank, December 5, 2006 at 9:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Just because a man doesn’t have a gun doesn’t mean he is unarmed. A car can be a deadly weapon both legally and in reality. Eyewitnesses claim the ‘unarmed driver’ rammed the car into an undercover police officer (on foot), then rammed an unmarked police car, then drove up on the sidewalk and rammed it again. All this BEFORE the shooting started.
Jabari Asim, if the details of the case are worth repeating, then why did you omit these rather salient detail? Doesn’t fit your spin, I guess.
Report this