LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Blagojevich vs. the Senate

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Israeli Voices for Peace

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Marie Cocco: A Prescription for Congress

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 16, 2006

By Marie Cocco

WASHINGTON—The Medicare prescription drug program is the single totem that best represents the ugly excesses of the now-defeated Republican-controlled Congress.

    The plan embodies that overworked but accurate catch phrase “culture of corruption”—a term that implies not only junkets and bribes and other matters that appeal to ambitious prosecutors, but the way in which lawmakers routinely reward private interests and political benefactors with callous disregard for the public good. The drug program is a bottomless trough for private interests. It was created by and for the managed-care and pharmaceutical industries.

    So it is remarkable but perhaps predictable that the prescription drug program is an early political flashpoint between President Bush and the incoming Democratic leadership of the Congress.

    Democrats pledged, repeatedly and emphatically during the campaign, to eliminate the audacious prohibition in the law that bars the government from negotiating price discounts directly with drug makers. The practice already is in place—indeed, it has been all but perfected—at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicaid programs, run by state governors of both parties, demand similar deep discounts and save billions for taxpayers and patients.

    Nonetheless, the Bush administration opposes price negotiations and derides them as akin to socialism. “Government-run health care,” declared Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt.

    To which one can only ask, where have you been since 1965?

    Medicare, indeed, is government-run health insurance; it has been for more than four decades. Next to Social Security, it is perhaps the best-loved government program of all.

    Medicare already sets the price for doctor visits, hospital stays, tests—for any and all covered care. Within the past few days, for example, it announced new price regimens for oxygen and the rental of oxygen equipment, as well as imaging procedures done by hospital outpatient departments.

    The prescription drug law isn’t the rule. It’s a jury-rigged aberration. 
    For the first time ever, Congress created a Medicare benefit that can be purchased only from private corporations—not through traditional fee-for-service Medicare, where about 85 percent of beneficiaries get their coverage. For the first time ever, Medicare is explicitly banned from using its bulk purchasing power to negotiate the price of a health benefit.

    The measure eliminated the discounts that Medicaid had been obtaining for the low-income elderly and for people with disabilities who are covered by both programs. Due to this switch, drug companies have been able to charge more because they are no longer required, as they are under Medicaid, to provide the medication at the lowest available price. Industry analysts have estimated the windfall from switching these Medicaid patients into Medicare for drugs will amount to about $2 billion this year.

    If all this weren’t enough, lawmakers also used the drug measure to funnel billions to the managed-care industry, including a special $10-billion fund to encourage more private insurance plans to offer a type of coverage that few Medicare patients seem to want. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an independent panel of experts that Congress set up to advise lawmakers, has said this funding should be repealed. The panel repeatedly has found that managed-care plans cost taxpayers more per patient than traditional fee-for-service Medicare—11 percent more, according to its latest calculation.

    This is the wonder of the private market the Bush administration seeks to defend and protect.

    In truth, there is far more that’s wrong with the Medicare drug program than just the bizarre ban on price negotiations. It is a convoluted system that forces elderly people who are in traditional Medicare to buy an entirely separate insurance plan for their drugs. It hurts 6.4 million of the sickest and poorest by making them switch out of Medicaid and navigate the maze of private drug plans.

    It rips off taxpayers so thoroughly, and so inventively, that lawmakers shouldn’t be rushing to fix the plan. They should be determined to scrap it. They can replace it with something better—that is, a plain and simple drug benefit delivered by plain and simple Medicare.

    This would solve the question—raised, legitimately, by the Bush administration and Democrats alike—of how on earth the government would actually go about negotiating with drug companies on behalf of hundreds of private insurance plans. Elderly people would likely flock to a drug benefit administered by traditional fee-for-service Medicare. It’s easier for them. It’s cheaper for us.

    And it would be a political winner—something the White House needs now more than ever.
   
    Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco@washpost.com.

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Grover Syck, November 22, 2006 at 7:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

As you said the neoCONs see Medicare as government run health care, and as such, they are out to destroy it.  They must be stopped, at all cost.

Personaly, I would like the entire heath care system under a government run system.

We are the only major country that does not have a government run system, and we are paying the price in more than dollars for health care.

Report this

By DennisD, November 19, 2006 at 2:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

We can keep it real simple - just give everyone on Medicare the same health care benefits that our elected and appointed royalty in government have. While we’re at we might as well make it the same for everyone. Cuts out the confusion - but when it comes to us commoners the government cries they can’t afford it. I forgot whose taxes keep these buffoons in luxury anyway?

Report this

By darby1936, November 18, 2006 at 1:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Heres hoping Nancy and Harry come in like its 1932. Where’s Roosevelt when we need him. All the more reason the Dems need to come in with guns blazing.

Report this

By Daniel Haszard, November 17, 2006 at 7:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

My issue is Zyprexa which is only FDA approved for schizophrenia (.5-1% of pop) and some bipolar (2% pop) and then an even smaller percentage of theses two groups.
So how does Zyprexa get to be the 7th largest drug sale in the world?
Eli Lilly is in deep trouble for using their drug reps to ‘encourage’ doctors to write zyprexa for non-FDA approved ‘off label’ uses. 
The drug causes increased diabetes risk,and medicare picks up all the expensive fallout.There are now 7 states (and counting) going after Lilly for fraud and restitution.

Daniel Haszard

Report this

By rabblerowzer, November 17, 2006 at 3:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Republicans and conservatives put profits ahead of human life.

The United States is the only western society totally dominated by sociopaths.

Anything that promotes the common good, they label as socialism.

They have gotten away with this despicable, amoral ideology since the founding of our republic.

Two kinds of people refute this truth, fools and sociopaths.

Report this

By joey, November 16, 2006 at 3:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The medicare drug program should be have a full autopsy done on it, under oath. Who got what and when? How much did the drug companies get, how much did the insurance get, how much did the H.M.O. get , who wrote the bill, why would anyone restrict bargaining.  Who introduced the bill? Did everyone on K street get a check? Bring the little twin boys back and torture them.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, November 16, 2006 at 2:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

CONGRESS
Symptoms:
agitation (by voters and opposing parties)
delusions (globalization, world domination)
grandiosity (mostly senators, just ask an aid)
excessive cravings (for money, big money and megabucks)
frenzied spending (biggest borrowers slash spenders on earth)
poor judgement (excessive self-interest and vacationing, legislating for lobbyist)

Diagnosis and Prescription:
Manic Disorder
Mood Stabilizer with Antipsychotic; withhold all benefits and receipts


HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY
Symptoms:
agitation (mostly in doctors, just ask a nurse)
delusions (patient’s over a barrel, God syndrome)
grandiosity (doctors and administrators, ask a nurse)
excessive cravings (for money, big money, blood money)
frenzied spending (rate 37th in performance, 1st in cost)
poor judgement (excessive misdiagnosis and misprescribing, Medicaid-care fraud)

Diagnosis and Prescription:
Manic Disorder
Mood Stabilizer with Antipsychotic; withhold all benefits and receipts

FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS:
Expert consensus is that if either patient fails to respond in accordance with expectations, several weeks treatment with ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) in combination with WBT (Waterboarding Therapy). Treatment may also include TLC (Transorbital Lobotomy & Chemotherapy) to aid compliance.


C’mon kids… end the greed and fill the need!

Report this

By david, November 16, 2006 at 11:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Marie,

You go on the premise that Bush WANTS to help the elderly and the sick.  I think that is a false premise.  Bush is a sociopath.  He cares only for what enhances his own self image.  Until we get a new president, no bill that actually helps the sick and the poor will receive his signiture so the point is moot.  Congress can do what it pleases but it cannot affect the bully in the White House.  How sad.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.