LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   The Pornography of Power  By Robert Scheer
 
November 23, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

To Each His Own Nuke

John McCain Battles Jackson Browne in Court

Why Obama Can Keep Gates

Dems Dump Detroit’s Man on the Hill

Fun With Ballots

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
To Each His Own Nuke

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
America’s Child

America’s Child

By Susan Sherman
$11.70

Arsenals of Folly

Arsenals of Folly

By Richard Rhodes
$28.95

more items

 
Reports

Robert Scheer: Bush’s November Surprise

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 7, 2006
Rumsfeld and Hussein

In 1982 President Ronald Reagan sent Donald Rumsfeld, above, to meet with Saddam Hussein to enhance diplomatic relations between Iraq and the U.S.

By Robert Scheer

How convenient for Saddam Hussein to be convicted two days before the midterm election by a U.S.-elected and -directed court, providing President Bush with his much needed November surprise. How irresponsible for the mass media to neglect to point out that the “crimes against humanity” for which Hussein was convicted occurred 15 months before Donald Rumsfeld, then the special envoy to Iraq, met with Hussein in Baghdad to develop an alliance between the administration of Ronald Reagan and that of the murderous Iraqi dictator.

The record of that trip, an enormous stain on our nation’s human rights record, is detailed in State Department memoranda readily available on the Internet. Rumsfeld journeyed to Baghdad as President Reagan’s special envoy after the bloody crackdown in the town of Dujail. Ironically, Hussein’s terror campaign was a response to an assassination attempt on his life by Shiite militants belonging to the party now in power in Baghdad, thanks to President Bush’s invasion.

Back then, Rumsfeld and the Reagan administration he represented viewed the Iraqi Shiites, who detested Hussein, with suspicion, considering them natural allies of their co-religionists in Iran. Rumsfeld’s mission was explicitly intended to align the United States with Hussein’s Iraq and offer military support in the ongoing war with the Iranian ayatollahs, regarded as our main enemy in the Mideast.

Rumseld met with Hussein in December 1983 and returned again on March 24, 1984—the very same day the United Nations released a report that Iraq had committed war crimes by using mustard gas and tabun nerve agent against Iranian troops. “American diplomats pronounce themselves satisfied with Iraq and the U.S., and suggest that normal diplomatic ties have been established in all but name,” The New York Times reported five days later.

The official transcripts of Rumsfeld’s report on his meetings with then Iraq Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz and Hussein himself make clear that our defense secretary never even mentioned the brutal suppression of the Dujail Shiites, which has now earned the dictator a death sentence. The diplomatic message was clear: Hussein’s brutality, and even his use of chemical weapons, was not an obstacle to warm relations between the United States and Iraq.

“I said I thought we had areas of common interest, particularly the security and stability in the [Persian] Gulf, which had been jeopardized as a result of the Iranian revolution,” Rumsfeld wrote in a memo to the U.S. secretary of state, summarizing his meeting with Aziz. “I added that the U.S. had no interest in an Iranian victory. To the contrary we would not want Iran’s influence expanded at the expense of Iraq. As with all nations, we respect Iraq’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.”

Clearly, Rumsfeld, brought back to the White House more than a decade later by President Bush the Younger, had by then lost whatever interest he might have had in “Iraq’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.” But even at the time, his high-minded rhetoric bore no relation to reality: At no point did Rumsfeld ever criticize Iraq’s invasion of Iran, which had actually started the eight-year-long war, one of history’s ugliest. Nor did Rumsfeld indicate in any way that Hussein might be associated with terrorism.

According to news reports and official affidavits, Reagan had decided as early as 1982 that the United States could not afford to allow Iraq to lose. Indeed, the United States would become the major supporter of Iraq’s war efforts, funneling billions of dollars in cash, arms and so-called dual-use technologies through intermediary channels. The United States directly sold $200 million in helicopters to Hussein’s regime, and our allies were encouraged by Reagan to be just as accommodating.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention even sent Iraq 14 agents “with biological warfare significance,” including West Nile virus, according to U.S. Senate investigators, in a 1994 report led by Sen. Donald Riegle. Another Senate committee report, also in 1994, detailed 70 shipments of dangerous biological strains, including anthrax bacillus, which later were found to be “identical to those the U.N. inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program,” the Senate Banking Committee report said.

A fair international tribunal judging Hussein’s many crimes would have provided a venue for exposing the tyrant’s international backers, led by the United States and its allies. That is why this trial was conducted, at Bush’s insistence, not in a neutral setting but rather in occupied Iraq. While this arrangement served Bush’s domestic political agenda, as a means of dispensing justice it is an outrage befitting a president who has besmirched the ideals of democracy in the eyes of the world.

E-mail Robert Scheer at rscheer@truthdig.com.

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: The Reason to Vote

Next item: Steve Wasserman: Requiem for an Editor

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By carlo settimo, December 30, 2006 at 11:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dear Mr. Scheer:

I watch the news on TV, the internet, I read newspapers, magazines, etc..etc.. and not once I saw, heard or read a transcript of what Hussein said during his trial!!. We were all shown pictures of Hussein speaking, but no sound. No one had the gots to show him?? or was the media silenced by the Bush admin.???.  We had finally silenced probably, the only main witness to our crimes in that region, just like we did with Noriega in Panama (by Bush Sr.)
I am envigorating by your courage and patriotism, thank you for doing what you are doing.

Report this

By Dave Rieker, November 12, 2006 at 12:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I haven’t missed very many crimes committed by the OSS up to’47 and after ‘47, the CIA. Since ‘41 when the allies invaded Iran (nutral) in order to supply Russia by use of the Trans Iranian Railway, completed in ‘37. The lives lost through coup d’etat orgainized and financed by C.I.A. operatives are too endless to list. What puzzles me is the continued ignorance of the majority of U.S. Citizens.

Report this

By Bruce, November 10, 2006 at 1:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In secret prisons hundreds of men are tortured despite no evidence of wrongdoing.
In Britain, a mentally deficient man has just been sentenced on terrorism charges for scribbling insane ravings in a scrapbook.

In Rumsfeld’s case there are the photographs, the documents, the money trail and the bodies.

What else do you need?

Report this

By Mike de Martino, November 8, 2006 at 11:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

If ever there were a story that testifies to the utter failure of our fourth estate, it is this story. For years a few have known these facts, but they have never been presented to the American people through the mass of the mass media.

Bright lights do shine in the night.
Keep up the fight bright light.

Report this

By C James, November 8, 2006 at 6:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

On 9/11, I was in a Senate hearing in the Capitol (on a global warming bill sponsored by Sen Jeffords, that sort of makes you wonder a bit too, nothing’s happened on the Federal level since then). The building was evacuated and we spread out along Washington’s streets. Not wishing to go on the Metro, I decided to walk the eight miles, in my suit, over to my brother’s house in Virginia. People were very chatty, and I ended up walking with a uniformed Air Force captain across Memorial Bridge. As we walked, we both stopped and looked at the burning Pentagon. I turned to the captain and said “sure makes a mockery of Bush’s missile defense idea, doesnt it?”. He replied saying that we’re always fighting the last war and that no one in the armed services liked Rumsfeld. and this was before the “public” planning of the Iraq invasion. Rummy is an evil person, glad to see him gone, but we shouldn’t celebrate. As Robert points out, Gates has a dossier a mile long that isnt very pretty either. Thank goodness we at least have the possibility of subpoenas now.

Report this

By Montie Shields USAF RET., November 8, 2006 at 12:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Scheer I enjoyed this article very much,
almost as much as your article titled Amer-
ica aided Saddam when he had WEAPONS of MASS
DESTRUCTIONS, and INVADED when it didn’t. How-
ever you didn’t tell about the Reagan Admin-
istration taking Iraq off the TERRORIST list.

Please rewrite your previous article i believe
it would make interesting reading. The article
I’m talking about is: PLAYING FOOTSIE WITH THE
TALIBAN. I believe the readers would be inter-
ested to learn that Bush and Condoleezza Rice
thought it was more important to get rid of
the OPIUM in Afghanistan than Combatting TER-
RORISM so much so that they gave $1.5 MILLION
for Opium Crop Subsidy. WONDER WHO GOT THAT
MONEY?

Report this

By Sid, November 8, 2006 at 9:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Scheer,
The results of the election yesterday proves your point beyond a shadow of a doubt. The American people have spoken, and that scumbag in the White House had better listen. We’ll know in about 20 minutes what he will do. I predict that he will still have that silly grin on his face, but it will have to forced. Thanks for listening to my opinion.

Report this

By Quy Tran, November 8, 2006 at 9:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

“WE WERE WRONG TO GO TO THE WAR IN IRAQ, AND WE CANNOT WASH OUR HANDS OF THE HARM WE HAVE DONE IN DOING SO. WE NEED AN INQUIRY TO TELL US HOW HE LED US INTO THIS DISASTER, AND TO MAKE SURE THAT NO VAINGLORIOUS AND IGNORANT PRIME MINISTER CAN EVER DO THIS AGAIN”

Above are words spreading in the British Parliament not just aiming at King George but also at Tony “Bush’s Poodle” Blair who will leave Downing Street next year. We have to take off our hats to the members of British Parliament because they’re brave enough to speak up their minds.

It’s too bad that no one in our Congress had the guts, integrity and courage to stand up and say his/her condemnations.

Why should we vote for those cowards and let them sit on the top of our head then peeing down ! From now on, just remember “NEVER VOTE STUPID”.

Report this

By Quy Tran, November 8, 2006 at 8:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Nobody is surprising that a lot of retired generals and the press wanted to behead Donald Rumsfeld. Why ? because the Secretary of Defense had manipulated the Pentagon into a war they think “militarily unwinnable” and our troops are surely be in jeopardy. At this point our retired brasses and press are absolutely right. Just October alone more than 100 U.S. troops have been killed in vague and without an explanation.
Why ? because the war plan was approved by ineffective secretary. Rumsfeld was bemoaning his own iffectiveness so that even the conservative Weekly Standard was calling for his resignation just the end of his first year on the job !

There’s really no career that should let him taking care of Department of Defense (DOD), because his active political and governmental career had been over for almost 3 decades. His statue and that of Cheney were only revived by King George’s restoration throne. He lacked everything to be a good leader, and for him this golden position is his last chance.

Command is to prepare in advance but he was described as crabby, sour, mean-spirited. He complaints about eveything and always dissatisfied, even with himself. To be correct he is “THE BREAKING-THE-ORGANIZATION-IN PIECES”
secretary.

Truth sometimes hurts but we have to ring the alarming bell that the longer he is on the top of the Pentagon and all the active brasses the more our troops will be sacrificed for nothing. But our King is still sleepy while the whole outside world is awake. We’ve feeling that our King is an alien from other planet so he’s deaf and dumb to all circumstances.

Report this

By Raoul N. Rizik, November 8, 2006 at 7:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

For an excellent article on the Hussein verdict, I suggest Mr. Scheer, of whom I am a great fan,go to <WSWS.org>

By the way, that site wrote a very good article when he was ousted by the “liberal” times. He can do a search on it.

Raoul N. Rizik

Report this

By Victor Berry, November 8, 2006 at 3:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Didn’t every American feel a little bit “Roman” when Bush announced that Saddam Hussein had been sentenced to death and his Republican crowd responded with thunderous applause and cheers?

Based on these past twelve years in America, I would recommend to every Kurd and Sunni in Iraq to run away as fast as possible from Bush’s democracy project in Iraq.  A permanent Shia majority sounds like a permanent Republican majority which sounds like tyranny of the majority and totalitarianism.

Report this

By Frank Pitz, November 8, 2006 at 3:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

And the beat goes on...The insipid Amerikan public with no sense of history and a memory span that would not fill a thimble, continue moving blissfully along.
History and world affairs are not reality tv shows, ergo the masses (in this country) could care less about yesteryear. 
Perhaps if we presented history and world events as an oval learning course and slapped sponsor logos all over it ala NASCAR some of it might sink in, though, I doubt it.

Report this

By Bukko in Australia, November 8, 2006 at 2:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

How convenient that he’ll be executed before he goes on trial for the Anfall poison gas killings. That way, he can’t testify about the ingredients that Ronald Dumsfeld sold him…

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.