Top Leaderboard, Site wide
September 30, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






The Underground Girls of Kabul


Truthdig Bazaar
Gringos in Paradise

Gringos in Paradise

By Barry Golson
$17.16

more items

 
Report

A Tale of Two Transitions

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 1, 2006
Fidel and Raul
AP / Dario Lopez-Mills

Cuban leader Fidel Castro is helped by his brother, Raul, to take his seat at Cuba’s National Assembly in 2004 after being injured in a fall earlier that year.

By Nicholas Shumaker

Editor’s note: Fidel Castro may be close to death, but his anti-American brother, Raul, is assuming control of a Cuba that has quietly made economic gains despite 44 years of U.S. sanctions.
Why, then, is the United States still pumping tens of millions per year into regime-change efforts that have proved to be a dismal failure?
An American documentary filmmaker who spent the last three years in Cuba digs at the truth from both sides of the Florida Straits.




This certainly wasn?t the way Fidel Castro imagined celebrating his 80th birthday on August 13th.
 
In the ideal version, the small island nation would have shut down to pay homage as its divisive autocrat began his ninth decade.  From the peaks of Baracoa to the lush tobacco fields of Pinar del Rio, CDRs, political neighborhood watch groups sponsored by the Communist Party, would have organized large-scale gatherings to fete his new year.  Hundreds of thousands of party members would have chanted, screamed and thrown their fists up in the Anti-Imperialist Plaza in the Vedado section of Havana. And Fidel himself probably would have topped off the fiesta by delivering one of his trademark seven-hour tirades extolling the virtues of the socialist state—a discourse that would all but cement his perceived immortality, commend his country?s increased economic position thanks to favorable trade terms from Venezuela and China, and vilify the bully 90 miles north that, through nine consecutive presidential administrations, has tried unsuccessfully to squeeze the Red out of his political machine.

 

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
To the surprise of Cubans on and off the island, the lead-up to Aug. 13 has been markedly atypical.  Beginning in June, Cuba?s elite politburo effectively instructed the state-controlled media to officially announce Fidel?s 75-year-old younger brother, Raul, as successor. Then, late in the evening of July 31, Fidel Castro announced via the nightly news program, ?La Mesa Redonda,? that he would undergo serious surgery to alleviate intestinal bleeding.  More important, during his recovery, he would temporarily cede power, and Raul would take over as El Jefe. In an uncharacteristic move that hints at the severity of his condition, Fidel has even pushed back his birthday celebrations from Aug. 13 to Dec. 2.  While it benefits no one to place bets or revel in the potential timeliness or proximity of his death, the divergent and conflicting plans for transition and succession propagated from Miami, Washington, D.C., and Havana need to be scrutinized, now more than ever, to begin to gauge what the contesting visions hold for a struggling population of 11 million—and the last Communist country in the Western Hemisphere.

The United States? government unfettered zeal to unseat Castro and welcome democracy to Cuba has a fabled, near-cartoonish history that began in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis when the CIA undertook nearly 27 assassination attempts that ranged from an exploding cigar to a poisoned wet suit all the way to hitting the despot with the most potent LSD that Haight-Ashbury could manufacture.  As the Cold War simmered, the U.S. government began to lose active, covert interest in eliminating Fidel.  The successive administrations, both Republican and Democrat, remained resolute on placating Miami lobbyist groups by tightening sanctions on the island, presumably to suffocate the country into revolt.  Gone, though, were the days of James Bond-style espionage and attempted murder.

In the waning hours of the Clinton administration, America?s attitude toward Cuba began to change once again. USAID, a governmental organization that, since the inauguration of the Marshall Plan, has assisted countries in developing democratic reforms, began funneling money to activist groups in Miami. Those groups in turn attempted to channel the grants to dissidents on the island.  But it wasn?t until 2004 that the size of America?s assistance packages began to square with the intensity of its anti-Castro rhetoric.
 
Under President George W. Bush, the budget to hasten Castro?s demise has grown from $7 million to $36 million biannually (.pdf file). The group largely responsible for the dispersal of these monies is Assistance to a Free Cuba (CAFC), a Bush-established, State Department-administered organization aimed at bringing about democratic regime change in Cuba. To date, the majority of the funding has been allocated to the State Department, USAID and other government entities for the purposes of funding educational programs about democracy; fiscally propping up Cuban dissidents; eliminating illegal travel to Cuba by U.S. citizens; flushing out ?mules? that transport money to Cuban families; and supporting anti-Castro propaganda efforts.

However, the ineffectiveness of these programs (more on that later), has allowed Castro to categorize all the dissidents on the island as mercenaries—paid foot soldiers of the U.S. government and the Miami Mafia ? while at the same time lending credence to his claim that the U.S. stands on the brink of invasion at a moment?s notice.

And rather than backing off on these efforts, the U.S. seems determined to redouble them. Earlier this month, President Bush approved, upon the CAFC?s recommendation, a jaw-dropping $80 million every two years for efforts aimed at regime change in Cuba.  Undeterred by a history of failure in Latin America in building democratic states, the Bush administration seems intent on continuing to pour money into a sinkhole that has already devoured nearly 50 years of effort and is likely to enable the Communist government to have its way in terms of power transfer.



Next page:  Why has the U.S. spent almost $500 million on radio and TV programming that the vast majority of Cubans cannot receive?


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By saul2006, August 9, 2006 at 11:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Castro is no great hero, but considering what Cuba was before he is an improvement.
As for the anti Us Raul- was it not America who was anti Castro and tried to bring the country to it’s knees? That would seem to a very good reason to be anti Castro.
Much of the anti Castro problem originates with the Catholic Church and given a choice between Catholicsm and Castro, I don’t see a big difference.
While many Cubans who had their property taken away have a beef, there are many who were Not Capitalists but pigs enriched by Baptista

Report this

By Nicholas Shumaker, August 5, 2006 at 8:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Spinoza,
I don’t mean this as rhetorical device, but if you should really try out life as a Cuban in Cuba before you herald it as an unfettered success, and before you claim that Castro has done more for the world than any other living man.

If it’s of any consolation, a large number of foreign-Cuban joint ventures have been shut down over the last two years—possibly preparing for a transition.

As for the maintenance of the Embargo, if you feel that’s necessary for the preservation of Castro’s system, it makes pawns and victims out of the eleven million people who are forced to endure.

In response to the Free Press, if Americans are the most uninformed populace it’s by their own accord.  We, as a country, have access to internet, various news agencies (both national and world,) and sites like this that try to get to the bottom of it.

On the other hand, Cubans have three government run news channels, exceptionally limited access to the internet, a handful of state controlled newspapers, and the ability to alter and pirate CNN, adding in their own captions.  I would say the campaign to keep Cubans in the dark is there—and it has very little to do with the U S of A’s Embargo and passive-aggressive tactics.

Americans could be the laziest, but we can get access to things if we’re so riled.

Report this

By Skip Wenz, August 4, 2006 at 9:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m glad to see Nicholas Shumaker actually responing to his readers and critics.  Many writers are above such interaction, which comes across as indifference.

One of the outstanding feelings I got from being in Cuba is that there is no poverty there.  (WHAT??!!)  There are plenty of poor people—in fact, almost everyone is poor. But there is no poverty in the sense that the “poor” feel themselves disenfranchised. Their lives are not just a daily struggle for subsistance as are those of the poor almost everywhere else, including, especially including,the US. To be “poor” is not shameful or depressing, engendering of anger, a dead end.

By law, everyone in Cuba has a place to live.  To my knowledge, there are no homeless there. While it’s true that a typical Cuban’s abode is far more humble than a middle class American home, it’s paradise compared to the box under a bridge in which millions of Americans find themselves spending the winter.

Every Cuban is guaranteed a minimal alotment of food, every day.  Every Cuban has free medical care, for life, and the Cuban medical system is excellent. Every Cuban has free education, from kindergarten through graduate school.  All this is guaranteed by law. 

The right to criticize the government in Cuba is not as great as it is here, and it should be liberalized—guaranteed, in fact.  As I told one Cuban, if the Revolution is truly strong, it will survive criticism—in fact, thrive on it.

But we must also remember that Cuba has been under constant attack by Mega-Monster US of A since the very beginning of the Revolution—the very same Mega-Monster that should have supported the Revolution an welcomed Cuban independence from Batista and the Mafia. Is Fidel and Company a little paranoid?  Or are they just savvy?

We should also remember that freedom of the press only benefits he who owns one. The US populace, for all it’s vaunted First Ammendment rights, remains one of the worst informed publics in the world. 

Finally, Cuba is not all about Castro.  It’s not “Castro’s Cuba,” as the “free media” in the US calls it. Cuba is about the Triumph of the Revolution.  Ask a Cuban.

Report this

By Spinoza, August 4, 2006 at 9:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thanks for your answers and I think I understand the comment you made about Venezuela.  Yes, I should imagine that you have captured the opinion of many doctors.  And you are right, I really think the tourism industry is absurd and that Cuba would be better off with the embargo continuing. I really don’t like capitalism and Cuba has moved to far in that direction.

As to public criticism of Castro and the regime I don’t know that much.  I do think Chomsky was interviewed by Granma and he was quoted correctly as being very critical of the imprisonment of the opposition even if they were taking money from the USA. So some criticism is allowed.  Not enough undoubtedly.

Nope unfortunately I haven’t been to Cuba.

Report this

By Nicholas Shumaker, August 4, 2006 at 2:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

One last thing Spinoza.
You mention “You were being unhelpful and defending Ameriscum Imperialism, only complaining that it was ineffective. That was my complaint with your article”
I was hardly trumpeting American imperialism.  I was simply stating America’s failings.  If they really want to have a positive effect on Cuba, they’d begin to drop the sanctions, which is what you’d likely call for.  Unfortunately for Fido, that move would undermine his authority, as he likely wouldn’t be able to harness angst that would inevitably develop from the already established two-tiered economy.  So to keep what you think is a paradise and unbelievable example as it is, you’d invariably need to keep the Embargo up—or else the evils of America would seap thru.  If you’ve spent any substantial amounts of time in Cuba, I think you’d understand the frustration that exists with tourism as the economic cash cow, and the economic apartheid that it has created.

Report this

By Gonzalo Palenzuela, August 4, 2006 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Too many observations, some not accurate, and no solutions for real freedom. You do not know the real truth about the cuban people.

Report this

By Nicholas Shumaker, August 4, 2006 at 11:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I simply mean, Spinoza, that there’s no point in deifying or villifying Castro.  He is a world leader.  Given what that actually has come to mean, I’m not sure if I’m familiar with one deserves a moral pedestal.

In terms of alienating the products of his educational system, I’d encourage you to speak to some of the doctors who I know who feel (a) trapped in the sense that for them to leave the country is a whole lot harder than the average citizen (which is difficult to begin with,) and (b) alienated because they feel they’re being overworked, underpaid, and have to give priority to foreigners involved with medical tourism.

In terms of a stall intellectually, I’d encourage you to visit some book stores in Cuba and tell me whether there’s a promotion of uniform ideology that conforms with the Revolution.  Visit ICAIC and ask them if you can do a film that explicitly critiques the regime.  Visit the Writers Union and say you’d like to write a piece in the Granma that calls for multi-party elections.

I read the link.  What do you want me to say?  Alacron is an interesting person, and he’s the mouthpiece for the Castro Administration.  There’s nothing surprising in my mind there.

Just out of curiosity, have you visited Cuba?

Report this

By long bow, August 4, 2006 at 10:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

40 years of stupidity on thepart of the USA. We are a terrorist nation dipped in a pool of irony, lies and ignorance.

Report this

By Spinoza, August 3, 2006 at 9:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Can you please explain what you mean here:

I would never villify the man, but I’ve seen, and spoken to enough products of Castro’s system on the island who’ve advantaged themselves to the educational benefits and medical advancements (which are, actually, hindered now thanks to Venezuela) to conclude that the negatives outweigh the positives, particularly in Havana.  From an intellectual perspective, the country has got a long ways to go—and it certainly doesn’t look like it’s making any strides forward.

Report this

By Spinoza, August 3, 2006 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr Shumaker, I would be interested in your comments on this Alarcon interview.


http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/02/1434239

Report this

By Spinoza, August 3, 2006 at 4:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am one of those people who have engaged in some hyperbole in favor of Castro and I am—I think—the only person who called you a right winger.

However, the context is in light of the article and in light of the fact that I live in beautiful NY State.  I know that Castro is not a liberal and is not a Saint and I know there are very many problems in CUBA.

However, to my mind the over riding issue is USA Imperialism and how to defeat it.  You yourself have pointed out that in the last 10 years there has been a lessening of an authoritarian strain in Cuba. I argued that, that is what Progressives should be promoting—-rather than attacking Cuba like right wingers do —-which is what you did in your article.  You were being unhelpful and defending Ameriscum Imperialism, only complaining that it was ineffective. That was my complaint with your article.


Mr Shumaker, This is what I see as the alternative to Castro, am I wrong?


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3573.htm

Everywhere in Central America except Costa Rica I am told, the situation for the poor is abysmal. So as I said at the beginning, VIVA CASTRO

Report this

By Nicholas Shumaker, August 3, 2006 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

R.A. Earl,

I don’t think Bush is in a position to run for a third term, thankfully, do you?

But again, this was an analysis on the failed policies of the United States and how they relate to the transfer of power in Cuba.  But I will nitpick a bit.  You mentioned….

“Lemme see. A “despot” is defined by Webster as “... a person exercising power abusively, oppressively, or tyrannically.” I might be wrong but the vast majority of the PEOPLE OF CUBA seem to support Castro in spite of the lack of democracy allowed in government.”

When was the last poll in Cuba that suggested this?  I can’t seem to recall one… ever.  Additionally, to come out publicly and denounce Castro is a move that requires rather large cajones.  Has there ever been a poll without recrimination where people feel free to voice what they want for their future?  I suppose Mariel might have been a bold example, as were the balsero issues of the early nineties.

Additionally, the early years of the Revolution, as well as his treatment of homosexuals until the last decade, would fit your definition of despot.

But again, it’s easier to talk about Bush being one.. a sentiment that most thinking men and women would agree with.

Report this

By been there, August 3, 2006 at 10:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hey John Chalus we understand you want to see Castro dead as you much prefer a country with multi billionaires and abject poverty that also happens to spend more on arms than all the other countries on earth combined.  Yes siree Castro bad, Bush good!!

Report this

By Amicusbriefs, August 3, 2006 at 10:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

America’s filtered view of Cubans is identical to its perceptions of the former Soviet Union. Those persons who actually visited Russia found a different story. Our information is skewed by a compliant press to parrot the government’s story, so those who have discarded books for Fox News have no standing to voice an authoritative opinion on conditions inside Cuba. Fidel Castro has successfully fended off American imperialism for fifty years. Nothing could infuriate conservatives more than this accomplishment. Cuba’s modest successes despite American sanctions is a tribute to Castro’s perseverance. There is a statue of Elian tossing Superman into the dust. Bush would enjoy a staged photo-op of U.S. troops pulling it down surrounded by a cheering crowd of paid actors.

Report this

By zeke, August 3, 2006 at 9:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“HOWEVER, you have not answered what has stumped me for at least 40 years: Why is a Goliath like America—- so paranoid about Cuba?”

Look back to last fall, when Katrina hit poor people in the south.  Cuba’s Medical Brigades, which has a long history of helping its’ neighbors in Latin America after hurricanes, bringing healthcare and training to areas where there was none, offered to send nurses and doctors to Louisiana and Mississippi as early as August 30, 2005.  They even suggested that they would not issue publicity about the offer if that would make it easier for the US to accept.  There was never a response.  Three days later, Cuba made its’ offer public and identified the 1,100 doctors who were on standby with 25 tons of medical aid.  How many lives were lost because our government couldn’t look after its’ own people?  Maybe the lack of response was because people would have questioned their government’s private health care system or why Cuba was so prepared to deal with the health needs of the poor, free of charge.  Is it too cynical to think that our government chose to sacrifice the lives of its’ own people rather than allow them to think that there is a humanitarian alternative to its’ capitalist doctrine of profit over lives?

Report this

By R. A. Earl, August 3, 2006 at 9:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“The United States’ government unfettered zeal to unseat Castro… began in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis when the CIA undertook nearly 27 assassination attempts that ranged from an exploding cigar to a poisoned wet suit all the way to hitting the despot with the most potent LSD that Haight-Ashbury could manufacture.”

Lemme see. A “despot” is defined by Webster as “... a person exercising power abusively, oppressively, or tyrannically.” I might be wrong but the vast majority of the PEOPLE OF CUBA seem to support Castro in spite of the lack of democracy allowed in government.

There may be regimes MORE abusive, oppressive and tyrannical than the one presently in power in the USA but I don’t think the Cuban government is one of them. Castro’s Cuba may have its drawbacks and weaknesses, but anyone who can’t or won’t realize that the GWB administration is doing it’s utmost to BECOME JUST AS AUTOCRACTIC is either feeble-minded or as despotic-minded as GWB.

Which government claims FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY as humanity’s highest ideals then openly admits it has attempted to MURDER, several times, another country’s leader? Only one comes to mind… the same one that gets my vote as ONE OF THE MOST DANGEROUS AND UNTRUSTWORTHY GOVERNMENTS ON THE PLANET.

Report this

By John Chalus, August 3, 2006 at 7:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Castro did away religious freedom and freedom of the press.He does not tolerate dissent. If the people didn’t want Castro they’d throw him out. That is bull. Castro has control of the military, the police and the General Directorate of State Security (DGSE). The DGSE is not unlike the KGB. He also outlawed private firearms ownership.He did this on the second day he was in power How could the Cuban people throw Castro out if they didn’t want him? They can’t vote him out. The Cuban people live under a totalitarian regime. If Cuba is so wonderful why don’t all of you who are so supportive of the regime go and live there. You know if you don’t like it you can always leave. The Cubans can’t. John Chalus

Report this

By Ruth Petit, August 3, 2006 at 6:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have worried for a long time what will happen to the Cuban people after Castro. One thing seems to be sure, the US and Cuban expatriates will try to regain influence and will be in there like the proverbial flies. One way this may still be avoided is, if the current regime develops its own brand of democracy by allowing another party to develop and run for elections by the people of Cuba for the people of Cuba.
In my opinion, that this was not done in the last 50 years, is the only mistake Fidel Castro made. He should have trusted the people of Cuba more. I also think, had the US reached out with a helping hand after the revolution, Castro would never have turned to the (then) Soviet Union. He is and was a socialist first and foremost, with the interest of his impoverished people at heart, the people, who were exploited by the criminal gangs from the US, with the aid and support of the US government.I wish a happy birthday to Fidel and a full recovery.
Long live Cuba libre.

Report this

By William, August 2, 2006 at 7:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Viva Fidel C.  may he live many more years.
His work has done more for his nation than any other prsident in recent years.

Let’s hope those Chicago gangster will never have a chance to reclaime their bounty.

If there is one man I admire it’s Castro.

Report this

By Esteban, August 2, 2006 at 7:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am saddened @ Fidel’s illness.  Despite the shortcommings of the revolution, the Cuban people can at least call themselves free of colonialism.  There may not be TRUE democracy in Cuba, yet we haven’t that either

The future for Cuba is still long, but as long as the people keep from being ruled by foreign influences as they are now, true progress will come to them all.

Some call the Revolution an educated failure…if this is so. I’d rather see an educated attempt and failure, than an ignorant success that elevates the few and tricks the many.

Report this

By Nicholas Shumaker, August 2, 2006 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While I’m amused that some categorize me as a right winger, I hate to deflate that accusation to suggest that I’m much more akin in politic to someone like Reinaldo Arenas.

That in mind, I do feel that some of the ill will that the essay might have generated is a product of the fact that both camps—supporters of Fidel and those who are opposed to him—can’t recognize that there exists an area between these two absurd poles that vies a progressive transition, or, placed more mildly, a change.  This change, without making the baseless, purely rhetorical comparison to the United States, could constitute liberalizing speech and press.  To compare the situation of closed speech and closed press to the United States is baseless and laughable.  While the US is far from perfect in both of these regards, they are intensely more open to diverse opinions than Cuba.

But again that’s to qualify the comparison as worthy and dignified.  Loving Fidel for an image of what you think he’s accomplished, whilst ignoring his indiscretions is equally as undignified.  I would never villify the man, but I’ve seen, and spoken to enough products of Castro’s system on the island who’ve advantaged themselves to the educational benefits and medical advancements (which are, actually, hindered now thanks to Venezuela) to conclude that the negatives outweigh the positives, particularly in Havana.  From an intellectual perspective, the country has got a long ways to go—and it certainly doesn’t look like it’s making any strides forward.

As far as Fidel being the most altruistic leader, I’d suggest a read of Brian Lattel’s (sp) “After Fidel.”  The list of counterpoints to that stance is lengthy, and compiled nicely.

None of this is to say that he is the devil.  No world leader is perfect.

Report this

By Becky, August 2, 2006 at 3:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The part about killing Castro with the ‘best LSD Haight-Ashbury could make’ made a little giggle for me.

Report this

By Spinoza, August 2, 2006 at 2:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

>>>The question is: why does a candidate not appeal to the moderate Cuban Americans

That is a good question, when the USA has a choice between a moderate right winger and a rabid right winger to back, it backs the rabid right winger.  During the Cold war in the Middle East the USA backed extreme Islamists over any leftist or even moderate modernizer.  When having a choice on foreign policy the USA always prefered the big stick method even though in the long run it increased the number of our enemies. This attitude C Wright Mills called “crackpot realism”.  Americans always used the argument that they were realists.  That the only thing the “enemy” understood was force. That the USA always also had a lot of enemies—-was part of the realist mantra.

Maybe the American people are more militarist than most people?  I doubt that but I don’t know the answer.

Report this

By Skip Wenz, August 2, 2006 at 2:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It seems that this gentleman John Chalus will “never be convinced” of what the Cuban people might choose, “if they had a choice.” A trip to Cuba might do him good. Everywhere, the Cubans I spoke with told me, “If we didn’t want Castro, we’d kick him out. That’s what we did with Batista, and he had the direct military support of the US.”

Perhaps Mr. Chalus doesn’t understand that the revolution was not originally Marxist.  It’s intent was to get rid of Batista and set up a democratic government. Because achieving that aim necessitated getting rid of the Mafia and the US corporations that controlled Cuba’s sugar industry, Castro was rejected by the US and ultimately embraced communism. Before he turned communist, he came to visit our country, where he was educated, and our government refused to meet with him.


Then came the Bay of Pigs, when we tried to invade Cuba and reverse the Revolution.  But the Revolution wasn’t a palace coup on Castro’s part.  It was the work of the Cuban people as a whole, fighting together. Most Americans don’t understand that.  Cubans do.

I doubt if Mr. Chulas is capable of opening his mind to the processes of history. He sounds like a sound bite from a right-wing talk show. If he is sincerely interested in the welfare of the Cubans, however, he should travel to that country, and speak with its people. Perhaps he’s right.  They would not choose Communism and Castro again. But I can guarantee you that they would not choose George Bush and the “re-Americanization” of their homeland.

The Bush administration has a plan to bring “democracy” to Cuba.  Aren’t we already doing that in Iraq?

Report this

By Delaney, August 2, 2006 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This was a very informative article. Perhaps I am a bit cynical but, I truly do not believe that the United States is honestly concerned with Cuba’s welfare one bit, nor has been since after the Cuban missle crisis.

Without debating whether the Cuban experiment has been a success or failure, which would depend on ones point of view and values, I think most importantly from the U.S. perspective, Cuba’s Fidel Castro has become nothing more than a visible and tangible personification of the political limits of U.S. power and global influence…Thus cementing our nations resolve to destroy him and his experiment.

As a nation the United States has taken great pride in it’s role as a superpower, and now the sole remaining global superpower. As such we have never liked nor been tolerant to those nations or individuals who have successfully defied our wishes, and acted contrary to our economic or political interests.

Report this

By jeri rasmussen, August 2, 2006 at 1:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

One of the highlights of my life has been the visit to Cuba right after the revolution.  I love Castro to this day and regret that my country was so myopic as to dismiss him. The Miami crowd are the ones that stole the public trust and money and attempted to sell the shore rights which constitutional were declared to belong to the Cuban people forever and ever. Our country traded decency and a budding democracy for thugs. What a testament to Castro that he did the best he could for his people and didn’t jump ship for Miami.  Viva Castro

Report this

By CapitalCat, August 2, 2006 at 12:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The folks in Little Havana remind me of General Chang-Kai Shek and his crew who were always about to liberate mainland China. Nowadays China makes goods for WalMart and we have no idea what happened to the millions of dollars that were funneled to the Nationalists on Taiwan.

The Miami Cubans have been good foot soldiers for the GOP. Remember four of the five Watergate burglars were Cuban exiles and the Elian Gonzales situation helped Bush find enough allies to stuff the ballot boxes in 2000.

Report this

By Jaded Prole, August 2, 2006 at 12:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I personally hope to see Fidel Castro live for many more years. History will show him to be a selfless leader who did more good for his people and for the world then any leader in the last century.

The U.S has no right to criticise Cuba’s democracy. Our pretense of a “multi-party system” is a joke. Cubans have far more access to their system and far more of a say within it than we can dream of. The much recounted difficulties in that country, both economic and political, can not be honestly seperated from the reality of U.S. policy. Cuba has been under daily seige since its revolution. We in the US have seen our liberties taken under far less threat.

Fidel’s lifetime of resistance to US hegemoney and for Socialism is bearing fruit throughout South America. That is the future. We are the past.

Viva Fidel!
Viva la Revolucion!

Report this

By John Chalus, August 2, 2006 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cuba is doing so well since the demise of the USSR it has now turned to Hugo Chavez (another jackass like Castro) of Venezuela for help. I’m sure that the Revolution values human beings. Only the ones who agree with Castro and his minions. Don’t the lock up dissenters in Cuba? Why do boatloads of Cubans risk everything to come to the USA. I don’t know of anybody going the other way at great risk. Castro and his crew are hardcore communists.Just like the communists in any country the rulers do very well for themselves. The military does well. The majority of the people suffer. You’ll never convince me that the people of Cuba would chose Communism and Castro if they had a choice. John Chalus

Report this

By Skip Wenz, August 2, 2006 at 11:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I visited Cuba, legally, on a tour of that country’s sustainable development.  On that one issue, sustainable development, I can assure anyone interested that Cuba is way, way ahead of the US and virtually all other countries. Part of Cuba’s response to the demise of the Soviet Union was to embrace sustainable agriculture and development, and it has served the country well. (See my article at the above URL.) 

The US fears Cuba because the Revolution values human beings, in contrast to our system which values materail success. All the prattle about a Cuban “transition to democracy” ignores the fact that the Cuban people are already by far the best educated and, in many ways, the best off people in Latin America.  This despite 45 years of the US embargo and medling. The revolution may be due for a transition, though bringing US dominated capitalism to the island under the guise of “democratization,” will benefit no one but the US capitalists. 

All in all, the Revolution can be judged a great success, and an inspiring story. We have a lot more to gain from adopting Cuba’s ways than they have from adopting ours.

Report this

By Bill Blackolive, August 2, 2006 at 11:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ours is the most indoctrinated nation in known history. We reign less susceptible to fear than to arrogance of thinking we are comfortable.

Report this

By Sebastian Doggart, August 2, 2006 at 11:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A very enlightening piece, if only those such as John Chalus, the first respondent to this piece, would read the honest testimonies of those who have actually spent time on the island. I am familiar with Nick Shumaker’s work, and of the enormous hardships he went through to reach an understanding of the labyrinthine workings of Cuba. He has no axe to grind. To dismiss him as a right-winger is laughably ignorant.

In response to the question of why the US is concerned with Cuba—Cuba is not a foreign policy issue at all; it’s a DOMESTIC policy issue. Florida is a key electoral state (as 2000 proved) and the Cuban American community is a key to the White House.

The question is: why does a candidate not appeal to the moderate Cuban Americans, most of whom now recognize that the embargo is the best way to keep the Castro dynasty in power, and that the best way to undermine it is to flood the country with Yanquis?

Vamos, Hillary—hasta la victoria siempre!

Report this

By Frank, August 2, 2006 at 11:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why don’t we have American refugees risking their lives to flee to Cuba?  You socialist Castro supporters on the board should think about why so many Cubans are so eager to get out of that country and come to the United States.

I find it ironice that one poster said “the only good fascist is a dead fascist” and “VIVA CASTRO” in the same post. Oh, the irony.

Report this

By Mighty_Mezz, August 2, 2006 at 10:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The us gov’t gives Communist China favored nation status, so we know it’s not because Cuba is Communist.

Why won’t us gov’t back off on Cuba?

Simple.

The CIA and the Mafia want it back.

Report this

By robert, August 2, 2006 at 10:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There are extremists on both sides of this discussion (wit. Spinoza and John Chalas). The important thing to remember, especially for people in the US, is that people everywhere want to clothe and feed their children. They care about those things far more than democracy or free speech, and likely they should because from almost any viewpoint it is better to keep your children alive and healthy in the hopes that things will improve in the future, rather than have them all die today.

In 1991, I was a guest of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and despite perestroika and glasnost, people couldn’t buy food or other essentials except on the black market. The government taloney, or food coupons, were useless, because the stores were completely empty. One of the other Americans in our group kept asking the Russians how much they liked this newfound freedom, and without exception their reply was that first it was more important to take care of their families and that democracy and freedom meant nothing without those essentials. 

This is obviously one of the big problems with Iraq. People are righteously pissed that even the security, food and electricity they had under Saddam are now absent. How can one care for one’s family under the current US-caused situation?

It is really important when our politicians talk fancy words about freedom and democracy that most people in the world will never give a shit about either if their basic needs aren’t met. That is why the most important help that we as a country can provide are BASIC NEEDS, like medicine, food, and clothing…politics can come later.

-the doc-

Report this

By Ted Tripp, August 2, 2006 at 9:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As Noam Chomsky remarks, Uncle Fidel committed the unforgiveable sin of dismissing the capitalist system from his native land. Simply so, the Goliath hates him and punishes Cuba, thus hoping to disuade other peoples from throwing off exploitation and oppression.
The fact that Cuba held out in its resistance to Uncle Sam and is doing well now because of China and Venezuela, not to speak of possible oil discoveries, is cause for great hope for the peoples of the world, and cause for celebration of Fidel’s birthday. I honor Fidel Castro and pray for his health.

Report this

By John Chalus, August 2, 2006 at 9:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What a load of crap. Cuba has suffered far too long under Communism. I hope Castro dies ASAP. The Cuba you speak of is pure fantasy. What are you the Walter Duranty of the 2000’s? In case you don’t know who he was he was the journalist who sang the praises of Stalin while he starved 6 million Ukranians and killed and jailed millions more. Castro is a sadistic dictator and his brother is no better. You should know better. Communism is a corrupt and failed system. Any country that is still living under that type of totalitarian regime is in need of real liberation. Castro and Kim Jun Il are cut from the same cloth. I pray that you wake up from your dream world and face the reality of the suffering that the Cuban people are living with daily. John Chalus

Report this

By sns, August 2, 2006 at 9:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why is a Goliath like America—- so paranoid about Cuba? 

Because Cuba represents successful defiance over time (read simplistic ideologues crawling out of their skins over this), and, in many respects and upon closer examination, has great potential of becoming a well functioning state and IS a model for meaningful social values. 

(e.g. US companies are clamoring to work with Castro’s biomedical industry, which is a great success, despite the embargo.)

Cuban freedom fighters are ignorant bums seeking easy government handouts in order to disseminate pamphlets paid for a government/people who will not tolerate a state unwilling to be exploited, a state that defies the will of Big American Business… 

“...perhaps only an outright revolt would usher in true democratic reform…”  Yeah, like the “true democracy” in Mexico where the voting process is rigged?  Just like it is here… 

Perhaps the revolt should encompass deceptive and perverted political catch-phrases, misleading lingo, and distracting words devoid of true meaning?  Concepts and words shaped and twisted to only resemble on the utmost surface the original intent as written in the Constitution; used cynically with a wink and a smirk.  Quality Time in a Democracy.

Do YOU Support Our Troops?  How could you not?  Right?

Report this

By Ethan Boger, August 2, 2006 at 8:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Isn’t it amazing that we know so little about Cuba. What we can say with some certainty is that the life of ordinary Cubans is better than most other people in Central America, including more economic security, better healthcare and better education. This is the correct way to measure the success or failure of the Castro regime. And by the way, what does “democracy” mean to a Mayan villager in Guatamala whose fate is in the hands of local “law enforcement” brandishing Israeli-made Galil rifles, or the subsistance farmer in Mexico driven off his farm because of NAFTA?

Report this

By badri raina, August 2, 2006 at 8:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

the article seems to imply that cuba is not a ‘democracy’ because it has a one-party ‘dictatorship’, and no freedom of the press;

are we to think—especially in the light of recent history—that the U.S has effectively more than a one-party system?  Or that its free press (if fox news, washington post, wall street journal and such like can be called free) has ensured that the administration turns away from fascist practices, or that its ‘democracy’ visibly raises the poor and contains the rich?

Report this

By Spinoza750, August 2, 2006 at 1:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

That is one stupid article typical of all right wingers.  Why no analysis of how the voting system works in Cuba?  Why no analysis of how the economy recovered from the special period?  Why no analysis of how the economy can be improved to make every ones life better.  Why no analysis of methods to avoid the retrograde capitalist system and to improve democracy in Cuba, (NOTE THE WORD DEMOCRACY, which means rule by the people , not rule by the rich as capitalist scum want it defined).

Down with capitalist democracy

Up with the rule of the people

Report this

By Firefly, August 2, 2006 at 1:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Very illuminating. Thank you for confirming what I have suspected all along regarding those Cuban freedom fighters in Florida who get so much support from the Republicans.

HOWEVER, you have not answered what has stumped me for at least 40 years: Why is a Goliath like America—- so paranoid about Cuba?

Firefly

Report this

By Spinoza, August 2, 2006 at 1:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

VIVA CASTRO

The best fascist is a dead fascist.

Castro has done more for the world and poor people in particular than any other living man. He deserves the honor of all of mankind.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook