LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   The Pornography of Power  By Robert Scheer
 
October 12, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Palin vs. Palin

Welcome to the Third World, America

Carter Kicks Bush While Economy Falls Down

This Is No Time for Specifics

Who Pays $273,000 for Household Help?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Palin vs. Palin

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Joe Conason: Middle East Crisis Blows Up Bush’s Illusions

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jul 19, 2006

By Joe Conason

Watching the president of the United States try to fulfill his responsibilities at an international summit is a sobering experience these days. To observe George W. Bush talking trash, chewing with his mouth open and demonstrating his ignorance of geography marks still another step down in the continuing decline of U.S. prestige. It’s the diplomatic equivalent of flag burning.

While Mr. Bush’s little misadventures make headlines, what they symbolize is a collapse of policy and a vacuum of competence that are far more troubling than mere cloddishness. Preoccupied from the beginning of his presidency with Iraq, alienated from our traditional allies and the United Nations, and neglectful of broader American interests in the Middle East, he and his team now confront a sudden crisis for which they seem woefully unprepared.

We are learning what happens when the leadership of “the indispensable nation” takes a mental vacation. We are also beginning to learn why regime change in Iraq, originally sold as the solution to every problem in the region, has proved to be such an enormous liability for us and for our allies.

Recall that when the Bush administration decided to invade Iraq—on the pretext of disarming Saddam Hussein—a new era of peace and democracy was supposed to dawn. Making an example of the toppled Saddam would, according to neoconservative theory, persuade other despots in the region to reform and reconcile themselves to coexistence with Israel, and stimulate the “peace process,” too. (That same theory, of course, similarly predicted flower-strewn parades in Baghdad and enough oil revenues to finance the whole bloody enterprise.)

Indeed, when the weapons of mass destruction didn’t turn up, those anticipated dividends became the retrospective justification for the war.

The illusion of success through muscular statesmanship has given way to a grimmer reality. The Palestinians have elected a government led by the suicide-bombing terrorists of Hamas. The Syrians, after withdrawing from Lebanon, have cemented an alliance with Iran against the U.S. and Israel, and continue to be suspected of aiding the Iraqi insurgents as well as Hezbollah.

The Iranians, having elected a defiant Islamic radical, are pursuing their suspicious nuclear program, predicting the fiery destruction of the Jewish state and supporting proxy terror groups. Wielding unwholesome influence over Shiite forces in Iraq, Tehran is well aware of the constraints imposed on us by the occupation.

The overthrow of Saddam has emboldened the mullahs and spurred their quest for nuclear weapons rather than instilling fear in them. Instead of encouraging moderation and reconciliation, the debacle in Iraq has undermined those objectives.

The neoconservatives’ marvelous theory lies in gory ruins, but they are again banging the drums with as much gusto as if they had been vindicated. The missile barrages between Israel and Lebanon are actually the harbinger of World War III, they burble, and frankly they can’t wait for World War IV. Things haven’t worked out in Iraq, but why not take this opportunity to hit Iran and Syria?

Let us hope that Bush resists this mad counsel. While his performance so far has been dismal, especially in his reluctance to endorse an immediate cease-fire, at least he isn’t promoting a wider war. Yet while he dithers, the killing and destruction continue—which is exactly what Hezbollah and Hamas want.

The president’s disengagement from Israel and Palestine—combined with his strategic blunder in Iraq—created the conditions for the current crisis and the danger of global disaster. By abandoning the traditional American role in peacemaking followed by his father and by President Clinton, Bush permitted the enemies of peace to achieve their aims. Despite the Hamas electoral victory, there was the prospect of a revived peace process in the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, the commitment by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to a negotiated settlement, and the endorsement by prominent Palestinian prisoners of a two-state solution. It seems likely that the provocations ordered by the Hamas military chiefs abroad were intended to prevent any tacit recognition of Israel by the local elected officials.

Forced to respond to unprovoked aggression, the wiser Israelis know that they can never obtain security through military force alone. The only way forward for them and for us is to achieve a rapid cessation of hostilities—and to revive international initiative toward a political solution as soon as possible.

Unfortunately, that would require the American president to abandon his own illusions and step forward in a way that seems far beyond his feeble grasp.

To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website, www.creators.com.

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Gerald, July 26, 2006 at 8:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

One think everyone would agree with, is that in any political discourse the reasoning and analysis are the keys in understanding the world events. However, when we in our countless political discourses, news and articles, always characterize the parties in concern with derogatory labels, we put an end to any objectivity and sanity we claim to master.

We do that every time, everywhere, all the time, day and night whenever and wherever we talk or write on politics, on national or world affairs. It is an American political culture we all are trapped in. Just read any article, any discussion, any news...by any one, they all are full of derogatory labels characterizing various groups and parties: “Liberal” (or “libs"); “right-wing”; “left-wing”; “neo-cons”; “radical”;
“centrists”; “Christian-fundamentalist”; and so on.  We do that not only here within the United States among ourselves, we also do that to others beyond USA, to all of those who oppose our policy. We label them as “militants”;
“jihadists”; “terrorists”; “radicals”; “mullahs”, “insurgents”; “right-wing-Islamist”; and so on.  The article by Joe Conason is not an exception.

The constant usage of such derogatory labels among ourselves here within the USA and towards groups and parties outside the US, is the reflection of our inability to be objective, reasonable observers and thinkers in national and world events. By characterizing someone right from the beginning with derogatory labels as the party to be condemned, you already have ended the discussion. You made up your mind. You refuse to reason. 

After hearing hundreds of times days and nights in our mass media for years after years of Hammas being a terrorist group who governs current Palestine, I was shocked to learn by reading one comment here, that many members of governing body Hammas in today’s Palestine are highly educated people of engineers, doctors, and professors. The author of that comment went beyond the label “terrorists” and discovered a new world for all of us.

For the last several years we hear all the time the question “Why They Hate Us?”
I found the answer today, because “We Hate Them.”

Report this

By jmkoch, July 24, 2006 at 6:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Conason says to “revive international initiative toward a political solution.” Curious to know what political solution might work.  Israel withdrew from Lebanon some years ago, but Hezbollah did not demilitarize.  Gaza still swarms with militants.  Would Hamas or Fatah do any different if Israel withdrew from the West Bank?  No Palestinian faction has put the “right of return” tenet on the table for negotiation, even hypothetically.  Let’s not exchange one set of daydreams for another.

Frankly, the cheapest and surest solution would be to give a Green Card and $25,000 in relocation cupons to everyone in Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and the Occupied Territories, followed by a complete cutoff in any further aid.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, July 23, 2006 at 7:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Excuse me Mr. Joe Conason! The Hamas leadership are not the “suicide-bombing terrorists” as you describe them; they are called freedom-fighters by their people and the majority of the world! Most of Hamas leadership are doctors, engineers, professors and other proffessionals. Their intellectual caliber is much higher than what you would claim for yourself!

Then remember that those you called terrorists were popularly elected in the most clean and honest election in modern human history; that’s with the testimony of Western observers, including President J. Carter. At least, that election was far more cleaner and honest than the last two American elections that brought evil, fanatic and incompetent Bush to power.

It’s indeed an irony that while you correctly outline the failures and disastars brought by the Bush administration to America and the world, with which I agree and concur, you fail miserably when you use the same language of the Bush administration and their racist propaganda language against those they do not like. You need a little bit of education on how to be totally honest and above stereotypes.

Report this

By John U., July 22, 2006 at 3:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Not only has every country in the Middle East (except Israel) turned totally against the United States (compared to over 60% favorable approval of us after 9/11), but even traditional allies have a motivation to try to weaken an aggressive, militaristic bully like the US and I’m sure they’re doing what they can behind the scenes (like stalling the WTO,Japan boycotting US beef, etc). Many people thought Bush was a fluke in 2000, but after he (very questionably) won in 2004 feeling hardened against us. Bush has ruined Tony Blair and brought ‘regime change’ to Italy & Spain. Almost all of the ‘coalition of the willing’ have slunk off realizing they were had by Bush and Co.

Report this

By Bukko in Australia, July 22, 2006 at 12:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

What’s truly scary is all these shouting heads such as Kristol, Gingrich and the repulsive O’Reilly dropping the phrase “World War III” like it was some exciting thriller movie coming out for late summer release. They are so disassociated from the real world that they don’t realise this means millions of people dying in horrible, screaming ways. It’s Lord Acton’s absolute corruption of power, where they believe the U.S. has the power to kill everyone it wants like they were ants, and suffer no consequences.

When phrases like this are repeated often enough, it desensitises the American public to the notion of a new worldwide war. One of these years before 2008, President “Edgar” Cheney (Ron Suskind tells us who really runs things) will decide to drop nuclear weapons on Iran. That will be because Iran has taken control of the shambles America has created in the Middle East. U.S. actions have put Iran in a position to sow chaos in Israel and Saudi Arabia. That’s going to lead to worldwide economic disruption. And with the unthinking American public (not you folks here, of course) primed with repetition of “WW III, WW III” it will seem like no big deal. Kill a million people in one day? Well heck, we’re in World War III.

I’d say “May God have pity on the souls of Americans” if I believed in God. I do say “Thank goodness I got out of the U.S.” Good luck, people. If there is a God, your good thoughts ought to count for something…

Report this

By Margaret Currey, July 21, 2006 at 2:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

One can hope that when congress changes sides that Bushie Jr. will be impeached.

Margaret from Portland Oregon

Report this

By Mark, July 21, 2006 at 4:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Greg writes:

“It’s wrong to think that the president of the United States of Everything will demand that Israel stop their war crimes spree. To say Bush is stupid or incompetent is missing the point, which is that what is happening all over the Middle East - from Iraq to Lebanon and soon to be Syria and Iran - is exactly what the US wants to happen. The Muslims of the world are the Native Americans in Christanity’s continuning use of bullets and bibles to please their god by making the whole world bow down to Him.”

I thought it worth repeating.

Report this

By Paul Tracy, July 20, 2006 at 8:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dismayingly, Joe Conason managed to get through an entire column on the current crisis without mentioning The Wall or the Zionist annexation of indigenous Palestinian people’s land.

Report this

By Greg, July 20, 2006 at 1:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s wrong to think that the president of the United States of Everything will demand that Israel stop their war crimes spree. To say Bush is stupid or incompetent is missing the point, which is that what is happening all over the Middle East - from Iraq to Lebanon and soon to be Syria and Iran - is exactly what the US wants to happen. The Muslims of the world are the Native Americans in Christanity’s continuning use of bullets and bibles to please their god by making the whole world bow down to Him.

Report this

By Adnan, July 20, 2006 at 12:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Joe, you might want to try your own recommendations and get informed before you decide to write another piece of Zionist propaganda. Unprovoked aggression, suicide-bombing terrorists of Hamas, defiant Islamic radical, are just few nonsenses you wrote in this article.
It would be hard even for Stupidman
( http://feral.mediaturtle.com/look/weekly1/naslovnica.t pl?IdLanguage=7&IdPublication=1&NrArticle=13985& ;NrIssue=1087&NrSection=17 )
to say more nonsense in so short article.

Yuck

Report this

By Steve Gray, July 20, 2006 at 11:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Bushie Jr.’s behavior at the conference was beyond pitiful, but the fact that he thought China was only a few hours’ flight means that he never bothered to look at a map. He’s still behaving like a stupid, drunken frat brother who thinks knowing anything is for losers. Anyone with a brain bigger than a mouse turd will despise him, leaving only 50 million microbrained morons who still think he’s great.

Report this

By Renny, July 20, 2006 at 9:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Once again, Joe has hit the nail on the head of our puppet president.  He is hopeless and helpless and doesn’t have a clue of foreign policy beyond trying to give a head of state another backrub.  We are in serious trouble for the next two years.  The only hope is for a Democratic Congress to freeze him in his tracks until 2008.  Let’s get to work ....

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.