![]() |
|
| |
|
Molly Ivins: Bush’s Hawaiian EducationPosted on Jun 21, 2006AUSTIN, Texas—Yea, Bush! Way to go! I realize this is last week’s news, but I’m a great believer in giving credit where credit is due. By designating the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands as a national monument, Bush has put one more level of federal protection around a vast spread of islands and irreplaceable marine life. As he rather touchingly insisted, this is a big deal—140,000 square miles of water that contains more than 7,000 rare species. Word is the president decided to declare the area a marine sanctuary after watching a documentary by Jean-Michel Cousteau. The thought that it might be possible to move George W. Bush to action by something as simple as watching a movie came as a new thought to many who are dying to try it on other issues. But the environment is an area in which a simple plea often moves Bush. For example, Ol’ Ernie Angelo, who used to be mayor of Midland and represent Texas on the Republican National Committee, sent a note to Karl Rove in 2002 complaining about an Environmental Protection Agency rule designed to keep groundwater around oil drilling sites clean. Well, you can imagine Angelo, an oilman, was not happy about this sucker. In fact, he informed Rove, the rule was causing many in the oil industry “to openly express doubt as to the merit of electing Republicans when we wind up with this type of stupidity.” Rove forwarded the note to the White House environmental advisors, demanding a “response ASAP.” So the rule finally took effect this month, but after intense industry pressure, court battles and behind-the-scenes lobbying at the agency and in Congress, it’s more hole than rule. And guess what? It has no teeth in it. Yep, Ernie and oil industry got what they wanted: the end of the Clinton-era proposal to require special EPA permits for construction sites smaller than five acres as a way to keep groundwater clean. Imagine the immense burden that would put on the oil companies. Really, unless the Bush administration took this kind of special care, Exxon might suffer a drop in profits. Next, we find the EPA has decided not to release information on 140 Superfund sites—these are toxic waste sites that present risk of exposure to those nearby, because the exposure remains uncontrolled. You might, if you hadn’t been paying attention, assume information collected by the government and paid for by the citizens would be, uh, public. “This isn’t a question of left or right,” said California Sen. Barbara Boxer. “This is a question of right and wrong.” According to the Los Angeles Times, “The EPA said that it had blocked only information related to law enforcement and that the public had access to all relevant health-risk data for the sites.” That’s the kind of sentence reporters write with a straight face. Actually, what the EPA is keeping secret is how much money and time it will take to clean up the Superfund sites. Why? “Republicans said Democrats want to manufacture a political issue, and noted that Senate tradition had long prevented the release of sensitive information,” said the Times. What political issue? The reinstatement of a “controversial tax”—i.e., the Superfund tax on chemical, oil and other polluting companies. In case you haven’t been following this, the Superfund is broke and has been largely inactive for four years. The fund was allowed to run dry when Congress failed to renew the tax on polluters. You may not believe this, but the oil and chemical companies complained mightily about being asked to pay for the cleanup of messes they had created. What a concept. Other environmental controversies continue to simmer all the time—out of sight, out of mind. Just one more regulation chopped here, just one more law changed there, just a little information hidden. But do be sure to give Bush credit for declaring the already protected Northwestern Hawaiian Islands a national monument. That’s a good thing. Is there an election any time soon? To find out more about Molly Ivins and see works by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website, www.creators.com. Previous item: Norman Solomon: This Is Your Life, Dan Rather Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By tommy Hagelund, June 26, 2006 at 12:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
molly,will you marry me?
Report thisBy rachelle, June 24, 2006 at 12:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Yep. So what else is new. It must be election time or something. Pleased for the NW Hawaiian Islands though.
The man is soo transparent. I will restrain myself from swearing.
Again, Molly, thank you.
Report thisBy rob payne, June 24, 2006 at 1:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It is certainly a wondrous time of year election time that is. It is the only season of the year that politicos become such good citizens. George wants to protect the fish while he lets the oil companies turn us into walking thermometers with all the mercury they put in the air. And today I read about two former Clintonites Carter and Perry who want to preemptively bomb North Korea. And won’t that make South Korea happy? You bet.
Look how up is down. Republicans become democrats and democrats become republicans. Was it not too long ago the republicans wanted to give us all one hundred bucks free to burn on gas? What happened to pulling yourself up by your boot straps, say, let’s see if we can get them to up that to one thousand bucks and we won’t need boot straps. Next thing you know we will have Ted Kennedy telling us we should liberate North Korea and George Bush will refuse because it would not be responsible.
Imagine that.
One has to wonder how much else is going unnoticed as this is the most behind the door and under the table and don’t let the democrats into the meeting administration that ever was. Perhaps the democrats will propose drilling for oil in Bush’s eleven acre lake that is situated on his ranch but Bush will want to save the fish there as well. I can see it now. Bush will hire Noam Chomsky as a consultant to save his lake.
But why is there all this republican secrecy? Surely they have the best interests of the country in mind. Katrina, social security dismantled, phone taps, orange alerts, apple alerts, watermelon alerts. Who could object to that?
Report thisBy Robert, June 22, 2006 at 1:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
So our president watches a Jean-Michel Cousteau documentary and declares the Northwestern Hawiian Islands a national monument? And this even garnered him a “Well done, Mr. President” editorial in the LA Times? Hmm, to get things done that benefit us, maybe we might as well go back to the days of yesteryear, with the divine right of kings, and have our Royal Highness, King George II, hold court every now and then. - “Pray tell, noble servant, what do you want of me?” In order to give these court sessions at least the fascade of being democratic, petitioners could be selected through a national lottery .. What’s even more exciting, the event could be held on prime-time TV,. where its popularity surely would rival that of American Idol. Meanwhile we could toss out everything this side of and including the Magna Carta that’s got anything to do with bringing us the freedom and democracy that we enjoy today. Compared to a lottery? Who needs that stuff, anyway?
Report thisBy Brant Lamb, June 22, 2006 at 8:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I wonder how may other republicans are embarassed to admit these shmucks are in their party?
Report thisBy 3reddogs, June 22, 2006 at 6:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You can be darned sure that if there was even the remotest reason to allow offshore oil drilling in those waters off of Hawaii, Bush wouldn’t have even considered declaring it a marine sanctuary.
And isn’t it just swell to know that big business isn’t just writing Congress’ legislation for them, but they’re also deciding what laws and taxes should be allowed to expire. Unless or until this country’s federal elections are financed with public funds America is going to continue on its inexorable trip to hell in a handbasket.
Report thisBy Hilding Lindquist, June 22, 2006 at 5:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Election? Shouldn’t there be a modifier in front of that like in “rigged election”?
You know if what is going on now doesn’t make “we the people” angry enough to take our country back from the self-serving myopic elitist oligarchy (the Oil Neocons) now running things ... then we the people don’t deserve to be in charge around here.
What these Oil Neocons don’t seem to understand while preaching free markets is that having a closed clique in power (oligarchy, dictatorship, divine right of kings/queens, etc.) is conversely proportional to a creative, vibrant society ... if their power goes up, the society goes done. In simple language, for all their vaunted brilliance, they’re idiots! Actually, they are plain old garden-variety greedy bastards.
You know, a person might even acquiesce for awhile —like in the rule of a benevolent king—if the Neocons weren’t so damn incompetent. They’ve taken a darn good country—one of the best (if not THE best) ever—and run it into the ground.
And then they try to tell we the people that we shouldn’t bw upset?! Are they kidding us?
Give ‘em Hell, Molly! The Good Book promises that the Truth will make us free.
Report thisBy Richard, June 21, 2006 at 7:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Folks:
Just keep you eye on the ball; the Repugnicans insist that it is an equal scandal opportunity affects Dems and Repugs. Not true if count scandals: (1) Dems I count masybe 2 and they are recent. (2) With the REpugs I count up around 12 to 13. So it really isn’t an opportunity scasnalization of our system of government.
I am a registered R and I am personally ashamed to think that these as…les get up in front of CSPAN and show how disconnected they are from us the citizenry.
Dick
Report this(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)