LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Holiday Scheer! Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
December 5, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Troy Jollimore on Karen Armstrong’s 'The Case for God'

How the Anti-Semites of Hezbollah Have Sent Anne Frank Back Into Hiding

Why Obama's Strategy Won't Succeed

They Don't Check Facts Like They Used To

The Crushing Legacy of Bush and Cheney

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Obama on His Own

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
GraceLand

GraceLand

By Chris Abani
$11.20

more items

 
Reports

Classic Scheer Interviews From ‘Playing President’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 15, 2006
Courtesy Akashic Books

In the below exchange, excerpted from a 1980 interview between George H.W. Bush and then-L.A. Times reporter Robert Scheer, Bush revealed his belief in a winnable nuclear war—which many observers think lost him the Republican nomination to Ronald Reagan. Check out this interview and many more in Scheer’s new book “Playing President: My Close Encounters with Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Reagan, and Clinton—and How They Did Not Prepare Me for George W. Bush.”


“Bush Assails Carter Defense Strategy”

(Originally published on the front page of The Los Angeles Times on January 24, 1980.)

... Scheer: Don’t we reach a point with these strategic weapons where we can wipe each other out so many times and no one wants to use them or is willing to use them, that it really doesn’t matter whether we’re ten percent or two percent lower or higher?

Bush: Yes, if you believe there is no such thing as a winner in a nuclear exchange, that argument makes little sense. I don’t believe that.

Advertisement

Scheer: How do you win a nuclear exchange?

Bush: You have a survivability of command in control, survivability of industrial potential, protection of a percentage of your citizens, and you have a capability that inflicts more damage on the opposition than it can inflict upon you. That’s the way you can have a winner, and that Soviets’ planning is based on the ugly concept of a winner in a nuclear exchange.

Scheer: Do you mean like five percent would survive? Two percent?

Bush: More than that—if everybody fired everything they had, you’d have more than that survive.


Want to read the whole thing? Pick up an autographed copy of “Playing President” in the Truthdig bazaar.


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By MARIAM RUSSELL, June 17, 2006 at 7:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

HOW IN THE WORLD CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON SOMEONE WHO THINKS THAT A PRECENTAGE OF PEOPLE AND INDUSTRY SURVIVING A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS WINNING. ARE WE CRAZY…...WHAT IN THE WORLD POSESSES WE THE PEOPLE TO ELECT AND RE-ELECT PEOPLE LIKE THIS. I AM AFRAID WE REALLY DO GET THE GOVERNMENT WE DESERVE.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.