Gene Gerard: White House Failing Americas AIDS Crisis
Posted on Jun 17, 2006
By Gene Gerard
In 2001 the Bush administration joined 188 other governments in adopting the United Nations Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS. Each government that adopted the declaration committed to improving its response to its domestic AIDS epidemic and establishing targets for financing, policy and programming.
But on May 31 of this year, more than five years after the global pledge, in an address before the United Nations commemorating the 25th anniversary of the AIDS epidemic, Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned: The epidemic continues to outpace us. There are more new infections than ever before. While we expect Third World nations to have difficulties coping with the epidemic, a new report suggests that the Bush administration is failing to adequately combat the crisis in America.
The Open Society Institute, a public policy research organization, recently released a comprehensive report on the state of HIV/AIDS in America. It suggests that President Bush has failed to effectively handle this devastating epidemic. Although the Office of National AIDS Policy, located in the White House, is responsible for domestic efforts to reduce new infections, it has only a tiny staff and little if any authority. Because the nation lacks a single AIDS authority, the government hasnt been able to implement a national plan to combat the epidemic.
AIDS funding has been hamstrung under Bush. Funding for the CARE Act, the governments major AIDS initiative, was cut this year. HIV prevention funding for 2006 at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was slashed by $12 million. Last year, the administration cut $14 million from the Housing Opportunities for People With AIDS program, which provides housing subsidies for the poor. Dr. Jim Curran, a former CDC director, has warned that the nations HIV/AIDS policy is hampered by insufficient funding.
Recent estimates by the CDC indicate that one in four people infected with HIV is unaware of his or her condition. But this is merely an educated guess, because the Bush administration has never bothered to conduct annual, nationally representative surveys. Consequently, policymakers dont know the full extent of infection. And the CDC cant identify pockets of infection where concentrated interventions are necessary.
The administration, in an effort to pander to the religious right, has failed to promote policies to reduce HIV transmission. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been poured into abstinence-until-marriage programs. Yet studies repeatedly show that comprehensive sex education programs help teenagers delay the onset of sexual activity, increase condom usage and reduce their number of sexual partners. Research has also shown that needle exchange programs help to reduce transmissions. Yet the Bush administration requires states receiving HIV prevention funding to agree not to engage in needle exchange programs, which it says promote drug use.
Although the United States is the worlds leader in AIDS treatment, approximately half of those infected with HIV are not receiving regular care. This is partly due to the high cost of health insurance, which many can no longer afford. Although President Bush has been in office for six years, he has yet to deal with the skyrocketing cost of health insurance. Low Medicaid reimbursement rates, which discourage physicians from treating the poor, have also contributed to the lack of treatment. And Medicaid eligibility requirements prevent most of those in the early stages of AIDS from receiving treatment, because they dont meet the definition of disabled.
Federal law prohibits discrimination against those with HIV/AIDS, yet under the current administration little has been done to enforce the law. As a result, discrimination is a pervasive problem. A 2003 ACLU study demonstrated civil rights violations against people living with HIV/AIDS in employment, medical care and housing. Discrimination has also inhibited access to care and treatment.
In recent years AIDS deaths have declined due to new drug therapies, yet less than half of those who need drugs are receiving them. The federal government funds AIDS medication for the poor through AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAP), but owing to budget cuts, 26 states that receive ADAP funding announced earlier this year that they were forced to impose waiting lists or take other steps to curtail distribution of the drugs. At least 20 states dont receive enough ADAP funding to cover all AIDS medications, and 11 cant cover the only drug approved to inhibit HIV.
Although those infected with HIV are far better off in America than many other countries, its clear that the Bush administration should be doing much more to defeat AIDS. In a 2005 speech Bush said, HIV/AIDS is a daily burden for our families and neighbors and friends. The president has two more years to alleviate that burden. Sadly, time is a luxury those living with AIDS do not have.
Comments
Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Ga, June 19, 2006 at 11:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
”...they are devious…”
They are unconscionable. (As in not restrained by conscience; beyond prudence or reason.)
The Reagan Adminstration too failed America wrt HIV/Aids.
PBS/Frontline’s documentary on HIV/AIDS is highy recommended for putting it all in perspective.
However, The Washington Post has an article a little less cynical about The Bush Administration’s performance over the last few years:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/28/AR2006052800652.html
Report thisBy Samantha, June 19, 2006 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t doubt it Encinitas Cynic. Seems to me that they strongly believe that telling young people not to do something will stop them- forgetting the mistakes and missteps of their own youthful years. And they are devious- they want to underfund programs that support their ideological enemies- whether they be black, hispanic, non religious or gay. There is a large part of our country that is now being excluded, I think purposefully, by our government programs. And these groups tend to be the most fatalistic- thinking that their vote won’t count, so why bother. After the reports of the voting snafu in Ohio, I’m wondering how we can get more people to vote and know that their Will will be done.
Report thisBy encinitas cynic, June 14, 2006 at 8:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is is it possible that the white house is casual about the U.S. aids issue because blacks and Mexicans are most affected? If these groups vote (and are not excluded from voting because they are ex-felons), they are most likely to vote Democratic! I’m unapologetic about being cynical. The last 6 years we’ve witnessed many unconscionable and incredible stragegies no less devious.
Report this