June 25, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.
Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.
Gene Gerard: Religion Running Roughshod Over Cancer Science
Posted on Jun 11, 2006
By Gene Gerard
The Food and Drug Administration advisory panel approved a vaccine for the human papilloma virus (HPV) last week. The vaccine appears to be 100% effective at protecting against the most prevalent viruses that cause cervical cancer. While public health professionals view the vaccine as miraculous, many conservative organizations oppose it on the grounds that it might encourage promiscuity among adolescent girls. Now that the FDA has approved the vaccine, conservatives are already working feverishly [http://feministing.com/archives/005183.html] to limit or even prevent its use.
Square, Story page, 2nd paragraph, mobile
Despite the benefits of the vaccine, conservative organizations began to rally against it last year. One of the most vocal opponents was the Family Research Council. The council, according to its mission statement, ?promotes the Judeo-Christian worldview as the basis for a just, free, and stable society.? Last October the council?s president, Tony Perkins, spoke against the vaccine. ?Our concern,? he said, ?is that this vaccine will be marketed to a segment of the population that should be getting a message about abstinence. It sends the wrong message.? He went on to say that he would not vaccinate his 13-year-old daughter.
Yet another organization that promotes abstinence is the Physicians Consortium. The head of the consortium, Dr. Hal Wallis, is also critical of the vaccine. In his opinion [http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/3429199D-5FE5-4795-B0E6-CD957617C160.asp], ?If you don?t want to suffer these diseases, you need to abstain, and when you find a partner, stick with that partner.? The founder of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse also opposes the vaccine. This organization was formed ?to promote the appreciation for and practice of sexual abstinence (purity) until marriage.? Leslee Unruh, the organization?s founder, stated firmly, ?I personally object to vaccinating children against a disease that is 100% preventable with proper sexual behavior.?
Now that FDA approval is official, conservative organizations are strategizing to blunt acceptance of the vaccine. Much of this effort is directed toward the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This committee is a part of the Centers for Disease Control, and is responsible for establishing the classification of vaccines that the government recommends. This recommendation prompts states to require a particular vaccination, typically guarantees that insurance companies will cover it and determines the level of public funding.
Square, Site wide, Desktop
Square, Site wide, Mobile
Although children are required to have various vaccinations before attending public schools, conservatives are against the ACIP recommending such a practice for the HPV vaccine. The Christian Medical & Dental Associations is an organization that ?exists to glorify God by advancing Biblical principles in bioethics and health to the Church and society.? The group?s executive director, Dr. Gene Rudd, has stated [http://www.cmdahome.org/index.cgi?BISKIT=343567272&CONTEXT=art&art=3241], ?While accepting HPV vaccine is morally acceptable, it should not be mandatory.?
And the Family Research Council has gone even further. While testifying before an ACIP conference, the council?s spokesman said: ?Because parents have an inherent right to be the primary educator and decision maker regarding their children?s health, we would oppose any measures to legally require vaccination. There is no justification for any vaccination mandate as a condition of public school attendance.? And Focus on the Family issued a formal statement declaring that it ?supports widespread (universal) availability of HPV vaccines but opposes mandatory HPV vaccinations for entry to public school.?
But in most instances, parents can?t pick and choose what vaccinations they want their children to receive in order to attend public schools. Children are required to be vaccinated against measles, mumps, chicken pox and various other diseases. Public health experts recommend that the HPV vaccine be administered to children at about ages 11 or 12, before sexual activity commences. And there?s no scientifically defensible reason that it shouldn?t be universally administered.
Of course, there?s the rub: The objection to the HPV vaccine isn?t based on science; rather, it comes from a biblically based squeamishness about premarital sex.
Religious values, however, shouldn?t affect FDA approval or recommendation by the ACIP. From a public health perspective, we can?t continue to allow conservatives to depict science as a cultural bogeyman.
Gene Gerard has taught history, religion and ethics for 14 years at several colleges in the Southwest and is a contributing author of the forthcoming book ?Americans at War? (Greenwood Press). He writes a political blog for the world news website OrbStandard, at www.orbstandard.com/GGerard.
Banner, End of Story, Desktop
Banner, End of Story, Mobile
Watch a selection of Wibbitz videos based on Truthdig stories:
New and Improved Comments
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide