LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Blagojevich vs. the Senate

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Israeli Voices for Peace

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Joe Conason: On Immigration, Too Late for Bush’s Good Intentions

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on May 17, 2006

By Joe Conason

For a brief moment last month, George W. Bush behaved like a responsible leader instead of a partisan demagogue. On the issue of immigration, which provokes so much demagogic and divisive rhetoric on the right, he followed his better instincts by seeking compromise. He took the risk of alienating his own right-wing base and reached out to John McCain and Ted Kennedy by endorsing a “path to citizenship” for illegal immigrants.

Then he must have looked at the polls showing that the Republican base is deserting him—and panicked.

The president’s decision to dispatch 6,000 National Guardsmen to the Mexican border, which he announced in a nationally televised speech Monday night, gives off a sour smell of desperation. Polls published the following day indicated that overwhelming majorities of voters favor sending troops to the southern boundary. Presumably, the White House polled to test its own “solution,” as well as the president’s message, before scheduling his address.

No matter what the polls tell Karl Rove about mobilizing the troops, the sad truth for him and his boss is that the public now regards Bush with a cynical eye. Conservatives no longer trust him on the issue of immigration, while liberals, moderates and independents no longer trust him at all. It is sad, because he once had the opportunity—and the sincere motivation—to lead the nation to a more enlightened policy toward immigrant workers. His welcoming attitude has long been his most admirable quality as a political leader.

If that was meant to attract Hispanic voters to his party, then it represented a refreshing change from the “Southern strategy” of racially coded messages. Compared with much of the dubious image-making that has suffused his campaigns and his presidency, Bush’s friendliness toward the Latino community seemed authentic.

Unfortunately, he has waited too long to lead on this issue, and he has proved so incompetent as president that he lacks credibility. Sending thousands of troops southward now in an effort to appear tough only underscores his failure.

Prospects for immigration reform along the lines proposed by Sens. McCain and Kennedy would not be so dim if Bush hadn’t neglected border security over the past several years. The voters who now express such resentment and fear might have been mollified if the government had done more to restore control over the borders.

While the president boasts about boosting the number of Border Patrol agents by thousands, the truth is that his last budget provided only enough money to add 200 agents. In Congress, members of both parties have sought increased spending on border security, only to be rebuffed by the administration.

That neglect has opened space for the ugliest elements in American society to reassert their brutality and prejudice. Extreme nativists imagine cruel mass deportations of Latino families, or worse, in order to preserve “white America.” Those lunatics have branded Bush a “traitor,” and many of his once-fervent right-wing supporters are attacking him bitterly.

On the far-right website WorldNetDaily (www.worldnetdaily.com), a columnist who describes himself as a “Christian libertarian” recently explained why he knows that the president is wrong about mass deportations. “If it took the Germans less than four years to rid themselves of 6 million Jews, many of whom spoke German and were fully integrated into German society,” he wrote, “it couldn’t possibly take more than eight years to deport 12 million illegal aliens, many of whom don’t speak English and are not integrated into American society.”

Assuming that civilized Americans are not prepared to contemplate a “final solution,” then someday we may realize that massive human migrations require substantial solutions. What we need is a hemispheric development effort to improve wages and social conditions in Mexico and Central America. But there are domestic policies that could also prove effective.

The first step would be to inflict serious penalties on large employers that exploit illegal labor. Make those lawbreakers shoulder the extra fiscal burden of education, healthcare and law enforcement that falls on cities and towns. The next step would be to break down the barriers to labor organizing in those same industries. Make sure that workers are free and unafraid to join unions, as they are supposed to be in a Western democracy, regardless of their immigration status.

Over time, such measures would change the incentives that currently encourage industry to abuse illegal immigrants and flout the law. Real reform wouldn’t please the lobbyists and corporate political donors, but it might just work.

To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Severio Nesich, August 18, 2007 at 6:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

STUPID ANDREW, I AMERICAN CITIZN BEFORE STUPID ITIOT LIKE YOU EVEN BORN.  EVEN YOUR FATHER PROBLY STUPID CATHOLIC OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.  GO GIVE MONEY TO THE POPE.  i AMAERICAN AND STAND UP FOR THE WORKING PEOPLE.  NOT BUSH LOVING BASTARD LIKE YOU.

Report this

By Robert Castle, May 29, 2006 at 12:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The fact is that we have a uniformed, quasi-illiterate electorate. They are easily led or misled by rabble-rousers. Elected officials, in order to stay in office must respond appropriately.  The result - fences, vigilantes, troops, and chaos.

Report this

By efarnum, May 24, 2006 at 7:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The latest noises from the president regarding securing our (southern) border conjure nightmarish scenarios - even worse than the current reality - which is pretty awful. The border will become Baghdad, another boondoggle for Bush and Cheney’s friends/masters in the defense industry and their tag along mercenary creeps.

Report this

By Ed Watters, May 24, 2006 at 5:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The option of deporting the illegal immigrants in this country will never be seriously considered (except by right-fringe racists and pundits on the the left).

Although there are many good reasons against a mass deportation, the sole reason that they are here is the sole reason that the people who hold the real policy power in this country do not want them deported: the illegals are a cheap, easily exploitable work force.

Paid in cash, often at the end of every day (except for those who, at great risk, use phony IDs and SS#), no payroll taxes, no need to offer benefits (the public will take pick up the tab thier health-care and thier children’s education and public safety expenses they incur), no need to worry about labor laws with a pool of workers afraid to seek redress: in short, these are the kind of workers that the greedy managerial class in this country dreams about.

And it is the managerial and elite class’s wishes and dreams that our state and federal governments attend to with the utmost devotion (esp. in a matter such as this where there is a complete consensus among the people who matter). When the mainstream media reminds us, as they have, ad nauseum, over the past several weeks, they really mean good for the elite class.

This is why, when the whole issue resolves, the flow of workers from Central America will continue uninhibited, either through a unenforceable “guest worker” program (with the government and mass media heralding our magnanimous concern for the poor immigrants), or continuation of the status quo (granting temporary visas to all - working age, of course -applicants that will surely be over-stayed).
 
Pundits on the left would do well to stick to the basic, fundamental kernal of truth in all of thier discussions, avoid the straw men so that you will not, at the very least, confuse your readers even more than the mainstream media does.

Report this

By Dejarodilla, May 22, 2006 at 7:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

El país se va a transformar por una ola de hispanicazión.  El gordito Carlitos, asesor del don Jorge Dobleve, entiende eso muy bien.  Mejor anticiparlo que cerrarse los ojos.  El Partido de Lincoln se convertirá en el de Juárez.

Los gringos nos robaron la tierra en 1846 y es hora buena para recuperarla.  Será una asimilación a revés.  Tarde o temprano reivindaremos nuestros derechos: trabajo, voto, alimento, salud y educación.  Y debemos defender nuestro idioma como medula de nuestra cultura e identidad.

Unas cuantas tropas en la frontera no nos deben preocupar.  Más bien ilustra la hipocresía e inutilidad de las medidas.  Los migrantes humildes reconquistarán lo que Santa Ana perdió a Taylor y Scott.  Y con cada nuevo parto poblaremos las brigadas de la victoria.

La fuerza definitiva no es militar sino económica.  Los empresarios gringos adoran nuestras manos baratas y somisas.  Por unas cuantas décadas sí tendremos que aguantar esta humilación, pero saquémonos ventaja de esa ciega adicción a nuestro trabajo para salir delante.  Nuestro predominio demogrífico va a asegurar, tarde o temprano, el triunfo.  Los jóvenes que cruzan, aguantan los asaltos e labran por el futuro serán invencibles y se convirtirán en los campeones de de la raza.  Estos bisnietos de los Niños Héroes vencerán sobre cualquier prejuicio, arma o fuerza.

Report this

By ETSpoon, May 19, 2006 at 7:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush is a lame duck. Everybody knows this, both inside and out of the GOP. The Republican Party, for the last thirty years, has staked its cliam to power by running against “The Washington elite.”

Now, with control of all three branches of the federal government, with a majority in the US House for 12 years, Republicans are “The Washington elite.”

However, by opposing President Bush and the US Senate Republican leadership’s immigration reform legislation, that features a guest workers program and provisions for citizenship for undocumented workers already living in this country, House Republicans appear as if, once again, they are running against “the Washington elite.” Chances of a compromise between the Senate bill and the House version, which focuses more on punishing illegal aliens with weak sanctions on those who hire them, will not be reached by the end of the current Congressional session.

It’s no coincidence that the “issue” of “immigration reform” came up in mid-December of last year, following a series of Republican debacles, missteps and Iraq. There has been a growing stream of immigrants, both legal and not, ever since President Bill Clinton signed NAFTA into law in 1994, the same year Republicans took control of the US House.

The Democratic issue, a Republican culture of corruption, may not play in Peoria, because an incumbent GOP US Representative will have to have direct ties to Jack Abramoff, et. al., to make the charge stick. As Tip O’Neill observed, once the voter gets in the voting booth, all politics are local; and the influx of brown-skinned laborers, maids and busboys into rural, mostly Northern European-heritage, middle America is very, very local.

House Republicans are betting on the almost inherent racism of Americans, especially white middle-class Americans, who benefit the most from low-wage illegal labor, and the old “outside-the-Beltway” image, the GOP has cultived over many years, to retain the majority in Congress.

It is merely another in a long line of cynical election year ploys by the Republican leadership to gain and maintain political power. If House Republicans succeed in retaining the majority, the issue of immigration reform will, like over-turning Roe v. Wade, banning “gay marriage and a host of other “cultural” issues designed to rally the GOP base, will quietly be forgotten. Any failure to pass the Republican House’s draconian immigration reform bill shall be blamed on “liberals” in Congress. Then nothing will be done or said until illegal immigrants once again rear their ugly heads in ‘08.

Report this

By Madam Mijanou, May 19, 2006 at 7:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Joe,
When Bush came into office, his only friend in the whole wide world was Vincente Fox.  If memory serves me correctly, Bush, before becoming president, had never been out of the US, except for a trip or two to Tiajuana, and his first trip as pres was to his friend and amigo Vincente Fox.  No other respectable leader would have him!  It was there and then that a deal was made to have bush look the other way as Fox got rid of his undesirables.  Bush so desparately needed an ally that he would have agreed to anything.  Bush figured it was a great deal for america, or the fascist america that he envisioned, look at all the cheap labor, the corporations and golf clubs all across america will love him!  Hey it was a win win for bush.  Fox found these people a burden, our corporations needed cheap laborers, another blow to the unions and middle class.  After all, if the middle class cannot figure out how to make a living by gambling on the internets or buying stocks, then they deserve what they get.  Right?  Now thanks to people like Lou Dobbs, america is slowly waking up.  Legislation that has a loop hole so big it will allow perhaps 200 million more immigrants into the country in 10 years has got to be exposed.  Get involved america, do not believe anything the bush administration tells you.

Report this

By Bill O. Writes, May 19, 2006 at 5:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Many have blamed the problem on Americans, and there are Americans to blame. Has anyone considered the real source for the problem, Presidente Vincente Fox? He is responsible for conditions in his country, just as Bush is responsible for this country. No one seems to mention his name. It is true that America should be a country of legal immigrants. We should not be the dumping point for another countries irresponsible government. Being a dumping point only makes the other country’s problems worse because it allows the issue(s) to be avoided. As the problems grow worse the immigration problem grows worse. America may be a sponge, but eventually a sponge can only hold so much. We can not hold the entire world. Other countries need to be responsible for themselves, especially democracies. If the United States has learned to become prosperous, then we can make suggestions. Microcapital loans may be used to help the poor start businesses. Countries that have escalating population growths may be helped with birth control, and women’s health issues, so resources are not stretched thin. Offer safety net suggestions for the poor like Social Security. Encourage policies that maintain a growing middle class for economic and political stability. These are solutions that have worked.

Report this

By Spike, May 18, 2006 at 7:14 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

My family’s bin having trouble with immigrants ever since we came to this country!

Report this

By Andrew Ridgley, May 18, 2006 at 6:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Severio Nesich doesn’t sound like an American name to me. I think we should have the INS look into your National origin. Maybe we can ship you to Mexico until we resolve the matter. Maybe we should lose your file and let you rot there. One less bigoted Nativist to worry about. I hope “ytake” my advice and lighten up. P.S. for someone supposedly so all American you sure don’t speak very good English.

Report this

By terenia, May 18, 2006 at 3:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

joe,
unfortunately many on the left want to try to make this a republican versus democrat issue.  there are a great many of democrats who do not support illegal immigration.  actually i believe there are more who do not support it than those who do.  for the media to try to portray we do is misleading and wrong.  we strongly support immigration but it must be done legally.  secondly, this country can not support giving amnesty for the numbers of immigrants who are here illegally.  if you include five of their immediate family members you have escalated the numbers up to 70 or or 80 million.  the social fabric of this country can not withstand this burden.  there is a point when logical decisions must be made for the better of the country.  those who support amnesty for 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants are being dishonest in their discourse not to present the entire and obvious truth of there decisions.  i do not hear you mentioning what will the middle and lower class american do when we add all these people to those competing for service jobs.  you already have people competing with their gradnparents for low paying jobs.  there are NO guarantees that they will continue to pick fruit , work in meat houses and only do the jobs folks keep saying no americans will do.  you give them legal status and many will soon expect to compete with all americans for job americans want (and they should if a U.S. citizen..they should attempt to raise the standard of their lives).  we are on the verge of making truly idiotic choices that will destroy this nation. 

in additon, if they came from a mexico with all its poverty they probably don’t care if they destroy the united states standard of living as it could not be as bad as what they had in mexico.  i expect that thinking from a poor migrant with little hope but i do not expect americans to be so willing to destroy this great nation by such illogical and moronic choices.  americans do not support these choices and the media owes a responsibility to accurately reflect their chois even if are legislators do not.  we need to work with mexico to improve it’s own country and their curroption before annexing all of its problems curruption and poverty here.

finally, if our legislators do push amnesty down our throughts i will be voting them all out regardless of being a democrat or republican including my representatives for illinois, dick durbin as well as OBAMA. 

where are the demands for mexico to take care of its own?

Report this

By SEVERIO NESICH, May 18, 2006 at 7:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

is one solution to the illegal women who come in this country to have a baby, and get the right to the citizenship, and all the gravy come with it.  i hope the politician listen and do my subgestion. to all illegal womens who come here to have their baby , should be stop, by changing the lAW, WHEN THEY HAVE THEIR BABY HERE, THEY MUST GO BACK HOME INMMIDIATLY BACK HOME, AND TELL THEM YOU CHILD IS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN UNTIL HE IS 18 YEAR OLD,, HE CAN CLAIM IT IN THE AMERICAN EMBASSY IN MEXICO OR ANY COUNTRY THEY BELONG,
THIS WILL STOP THEM FOR SURE, AND THEY MUST PAY FOR THE MEDICAL SERVICES, AND ALL NEEDS.I HOPE THE POLITICIAN YTAKE MY ADVICE, WILL WORK.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.