|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Molly Ivins: The No-Reform Lobby Reform BillPosted on May 1, 2006By Molly Ivins AUSTIN, Texas—Either the so-called “lobby reform bill” is the contemptible, cheesy, shoddy piece of hypocrisy it appears to be ... or the Republicans have a sense of humor. The “lobby reform” bill does show, one could argue, a sort of cheerful, defiant, flipping-the-bird-at-the-public attitude that could pass for humor. You have to admit that calling this an “ethics bill’ requires brass bravura. House Republicans returned last week from a two-week recess prepared to vote for “a relatively tepid ethics bill,” as The Washington Post put it, because they said their constituents rarely mentioned the issue. Forget all that talk back in January when Jack Abramoff was indicted. What restrictions on meals and gifts from lobbyists? More golfing trips! According to Rep. Nancy L. Johnson of Connecticut, former chair of the House Ethic Committee, passage of the bill will have no political consequences “because people are quite convinced that the rhetoric of reform is just political.” Where can they have gotten that idea? Rep. David Hobson, R-Ohio, told the Post, “We panicked, and we let the media get us panicked.” Advertisement The House bill passed a procedural vote last week 216 to 207, and it is scheduled for floor debate and a final vote on Wednesday—which gives citizens who don’t like being conned a chance to speak. Now is the time for a little hell-raising. Chellie Pingree of Common Cause said, “This legislation is so weak it’s embarrassing.” Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21 and a longtime worker in reformist vineyards, said: “This bill is based on the premise that you can fool all of the people all of the time. This is an attempt at one of the greatest legislative scams that I have seen in 30 years of working on these issues.” Come on, people, get mad. You deserve to be treated with contempt if you let them get away with this. I’m sorry that all these procedural votes seem so picayune, and I know the costs of gas and health insurance are more immediate worries. But it is precisely the corruption of Congress by big money that allows the oil and insurance industries to get away with these fantastic rip-offs. Watching Washington be taken over by these little sleaze merchants is not only expensive and repulsive, it is destroying America, destroying any sense we ever had that we’re a nation, not 298 million individuals cheating to get ahead. I’m sorry these creeps in Congress have so little sense of what they’re supposed to be about that they think it’s fine to sneer at ethics. But they work for us. It’s our job to keep them under control until we can replace them. Time to get up off our butts and take some responsibility here. Let them hear from you. To find out more about Molly Ivins and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Previous item: Joe Conason: Washington Leaking: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Next item: Rev. Madison Shockley: Christian Coalition in the Fray New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Eleanore Carlson, May 5, 2006 at 11:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I cannot believe that our so called government is sitting on their butts and allowing this to happen! Well, folks, there are elections coming up and we will be keeping track of who voted how and out you go! Have you no idea how disgusted the public is with your corruption? Enough already!
Report thisBy Mark Yannone, May 3, 2006 at 8:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
For those of you who are so angry at the Republicans in the House and Senate that you are going to replace them with Democrats, think back to 1994. That’s when you were so mad at the Democrats in the House and Senate that you replaced them with Republicans.
Face it. America’s voting record isn’t so hot. The majority has been wrong for a very, very long time.
Break the habit. Stop voting for red slavery and blue slavery. Try voting for freedom for a change.
Report thisBy Patricia Herrick, May 3, 2006 at 3:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes Konnie, I’ve been writing, e-mailing and calling the offices of my Senators,for several months now. Sen.Burns answers nearly every one with his canned response. Always with an excuse for why they have to do things the way they do. Rehberg answers maybe one in ten, following the same M.O as Burns. Baucus rarely answers. His office told me recently that signing on to impeach Bush “would not be appropriate.” My answer to that was B.S! Oh yeah, I am a Democrat.
Report thisBy john m sandoval, May 3, 2006 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Law enforcement and jail/fine punishment is a very simple and effective way to prevent and curtail corruption of government officials.
Report thisWe have laws in place - bribery is criminal - what we don’t have is equal application of the law.
That is how George W Bush and his cronies break the law and get away scot free.
It’s called “influence peddeling” - bribes with influence and money paid by law breaking Lobbyists, to corrupt government officials.
We have Laws ! - what we don’t have is Justice and justice remains to be seen!
Solution; apply the Law and vote them out!
Jonathan
By Mark Yannone, May 2, 2006 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The logic of the article’s conclusion is defective. Having pointed out this:
“The entire Congress lies stinking in open corruption, but they cant let the media panic them. Theyre actually proud of NOT cleaning it up.”
followed by this:
“But it is precisely the corruption of Congress by big money that allows the oil and insurance industries to get away with these fantastic rip-offs.”
the article concludes with the irrelevant:
“Its our job to keep them under control until we can replace them. Time to get up off our butts and take some responsibility here. Let them hear from you.”
Let’s see, pride in being corrupted by big money is supposed to be controlled with a phone call? An e-mail? A letter?
Here’s how the article should have ended:
“Too bad those creeps you elected to Congress have so little sense of what theyre supposed to be about that they think its fine to sneer at ethics. But you overlooked the reason we have a government in the first place, which is to protect the rights (not wants) of the individual. Its your job to elect candidates who understand what they are being hired to do and to fire those who fail to honor their oath of office. What were you thinking when you voted for this gang of criminals?”
That’s what I would have written. But that’s just me.
Report thisBy felicity smith, May 2, 2006 at 10:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Actually it probably would have been better if Congress did nothing all in the way of reform because every bill it passes, especially one that is meant to correct some obnoxious governmental practice ends up being worse than the practice it “reformed.” No silk purses were ever made from sows’ ears, most of whom work inside the Belchway.
Report thisBy Konnie, May 2, 2006 at 5:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
And you are surprised why?
Ever write to your so-called representative.
Unless your name corresponds to the donor list, you get one of those auto reply letters about what a good job they are doing, if that.
take to the streets? Get real! Can’t give up a days pay, or waste the gas to get there. Today was primary day in my state. The polls opened at 6, I got there at 7:30 - my ballot was #13. Of course, it was raining…..........
Its just about the money…...and if you don’t have any - even collectively - you are just spitting in the wind.
I won’t surrender, I will still Vote in every election, write letters, and talk, and talk, and talk…..........
Report thisBy jhm, May 2, 2006 at 4:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Before the all too predictable current state of ethics reform, there were comments in the media to the effect that there was a ‘lack of will’ to enact reform. Seeing as there are already a slew of ‘rules’ that congressmen are supposed to abide by, but that they rutinely bypass (“wave”), it seems that any more (or fewer, for that matter) rules will make little difference without any ‘will’ to follow them. In other words, finding the will to reform *is* the reform.
Report thisBy Dave E., May 1, 2006 at 11:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
#1 issue in America is this shoddy legislation for “reform” and here we are in a debate as to whether we should grant amnesty to immigrants because of their contributions to the economy?—the circular argument goes something like, a strong economy provides jobs for americans and illegal immigrants drive that economy by working in jobs that other americans allegedly don’t want…more trickle-down bullshit…
Report this