![]() |
|
| |
|
What Would Jack Bauer Really Do?Posted on Apr 25, 2006
Adam Elkus In a Jan. 22, 2006, essay that quickly circulated throughout the Republican blogosphere, Patrick Buchanan asked, What would Jack Bauer do? in response to the ever-escalating war on terror. Buchanan and a number of Republican bloggers claimed an affinity with the fictional counter-terror agent of the hit series 24, praising his willingness to [put his] love of country and loyalty to friends first and [fight] by his own rules. By this, Buchanan means he admires Bauers determination to protect the United States by any means necessarywhether by disobeying the orders of superiors, torturing, taking hostages or breaking almost every other law in the book. Buchanan castigates Democrats for attacking President George W. Bushs own Bauer-esque tactics: warrantless NSA wiretaps, secret detention centers in Eastern Europe, the militarys alleged abuse of prisoners in Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, and the detention of Jose Padilla in the dirty-bomber case. Buchanan goes on to state that such harsh actions are warranted and supported by popular opinion:
Yet Buchanan himself concedes that fighting by Jack Bauers rules may be violating the Geneva Convention ignoring constitutional protections and violating international agreements prohibiting torture and the rendition of prisoners to countries where torture is practiced. Nevertheless, Buchanan and many other conservatives argue that such provisions are outdated and cannot protect America from its enemies. But would Jack Bauer really just push the lily-livered liberals out of the way to do what was necessary? Yes and no. In championing 24, Buchanan and Bush administration apologists oversimplify a complex depiction of counter-terrorism and also use an idealized fiction to justify real-world abuses of the law and authority. A superficial viewing of 24 gives conservative viewers plenty of ammunition. Agent Jack Bauer obeys only his own conscience, breaking regulations and bucking the authority of his superiors in order to get the job done. Bauer has no compunctions about inflicting horrific violence on terrorists or suspected foes, by killing or torturing them; he also has threatened their loved ones to obtain information. Bauer is explicitly opposed by corrupt and inefficient bureaucrats as well as bleeding hearts such Amnesty Global (a thinly drawn caricature of Amnesty International) who intervene in season four to protect the civil rights of a villain. Bauer, as Buchanan correctly points out, is a vigilante-with-a-badge hero in the tradition of High Noon and Dirty Harry, in Buchanans words a flawed, but good man in a struggle against evil. This image holds a certain appeal for Bush and conservatives. Thus, the TV show can become a kind of catharsis for Americans frightened of enemies both in Iraq and lurking at home: Through Bauer, the viewer can exorcise the phantom-like presence of Al Qaeda. Certainly, Bauers Lone Ranger characteristics are part of the image that Bush has tried to project ever since 9/11. However, the implications of 24 are in fact much more complex than Buchanan recognizes. He and other conservatives cherry-pick messages from the show to support their arguments and ignore the disturbing cynicism and alarm at the heart of the shows complex storyline. For example, Bauer does not live in the black-and-white world of George W. Bush, where there are only evildoers and good men out to thwart them. The greatest threat to Bauer is not foreign terrorists but angry ex-agents, government officials and wealthy CEOs. In season five, a right-wing cabal led by the presidents chief of staff gives nerve gas to anti-Russian terrorists and plans to double-cross the terrorists and use the gas as a pretext for invading the energy-rich Russian province that the terrorists call home; the vice president convinces the president to illegally declare martial law; the Department of Homeland Security deliberately suppresses and fires Bauers colleagues who are working overtime to stop the killers. In every season, corrupt officials, moles and traitors all out for their own interests populate every sector of the government. The executive branch, represented by the vacillating and cowardly President Logan, is incompetent and, in a plot twist, in league with the enemy. Far from providing any justification for the actions of the Bush administration, 24 is a convincing argument against the concentration of power in the hands of those too corrupt or ineffectual to handle the responsibility. The complex message of the show is that we live in a dangerous world with far too many variables to justify pat formulas and flag-waving sloganeering. For example, Bauer is forced to execute his boss and friend, Ryan Chappelle, to appease a terrorist. The villain would have released a deadly virus that Bauer was not able to stop. Bauer and everyone complicit in this action know that it was the correct thing to do, but it was not morally right. Bauer and his colleagues must make many more decisions that compromise moralityand possibly their own humanity. Bauer is constantly confronted with the problem of having to sacrifice a few innocent lives to save many others who are threatened by terrorists and scheming government officials. Buchanan and others who ask What would Jack Bauer do? also gloss over the many unrealistic aspects of the series. Bauer and his Counter Terrorism Unit comrades are self-sacrificing and heroic to an absurd extent, going to unrealistic, Hollywood-esque lengths to stop the terrorists. Bauer in particular, like Dirty Harry Callahan, is a quasi-monastic figure whose integrity, power and judgment are almost infallible. To treat Jack Bauer as if he is real is like believing that Superman flies over Metropolis. Real-life examples of vigilantes are likely to be comparable to the Los Angeles Rampart cops. They did whatever they thought was necessary to put the gangbangers awaybut they became gangsters themselves, dealing drugs and falsifying evidence. One could also point to Bushs own use of unreliable intelligence and scare tactics to convince Americans to support a war that is now recognized by a majority of the public as a failure. Nietzsche warned, He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. In real life, Dirty Harry tactics are used by dirty cops. People are falliblethey can and will make terrible mistakes. Ironically, Jack Bauer himself would most likely have been marginalized under Bushs command. Like former counter-terrorism official Richard Clarke, Bauer tries to speak truth to power, and in the Bush White House such inconveniences are not tolerated. When Gen. Eric Shinseki told the president that the occupation of Iraq would require several hundred thousand troops, he was rebuked in public by his superiors. When several FBI agents tried to warn their superiors about 9/11, they were ignored. The Bush administrations contempt for those who point out fact instead of toe the line would have made it so that Bauer would not have lasted a day in a real-life Counter Terrorism Unit.
Next Page: “Bush has thrived on projecting himself as a Jack Bauer, a Lone Star individualist going against entrenched Washington politics to do good, when in reality he is as much a product of that same corrupt system as those he rails against.”
1
2
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: Robert Scheer: Top Spys Story on Prewar Intel Is Finally Told Next item: Taking Back Our Schools--and Fixing Them Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Keith, August 20, 2006 at 5:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nice site!
Report thishttp://rxvaagie.com/trhd/mfpg.html | http://hiassoyx.com/dgak/mueh.html
By Naomi, August 20, 2006 at 5:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well done!
Report thisMy homepage | Please visit
By Zack, August 20, 2006 at 5:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nice site!
Report thisMy homepage | Cool site
By Astrid, August 7, 2006 at 8:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
@ =] I’m surprised you don’t watch 24; but there might be other reasons why you read through the webs commentaries on a somewhat political show like 24. Thanks for your answer. While currently watching old Kiefer Sutherland-films
, I wonder how season 6 will open. The audience doesn’t seem to have appreciated season 5s brutal ending that much.. is there an end of what people can take? and is there an end of what the Bauer-character can convey? work won’t become easier for the writers. The more skilful they become by experience, the more complex and difficult their task develops too.
Report thisBy =], July 27, 2006 at 10:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
i’m amazed at how articulately you voiced your opinion. =] very well written
i don’t watch 24 .. but i’m convinced
a reader =]
Report thisBy Astrid, May 18, 2006 at 10:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Thankyou very much for rescuing “24” from alleged parallels to the current US Government. Only read your article now here in Europe, Germany.
We cannot talk much around it: “24” is not exactly a non-patriotic show. Maybe for me as a european this is even clearer than to americans. But you know what: I dislike bush, but I do like Bauer. I can accept an American like Bauer, very much so, and would definitely support him, whereas I wouldn’t with bush.
Though I do think that some of the writers are strongly conservative, they are still good writers in the first place. And that means they have an imagination about people and personalities. And Kiefer can convey that, if not more so: produce it in the first place, if the writers had forgotten about it temporarily. I’m sure about that.
Kiefer plays Jack Bauer much too dark, subtle and differentiated - usually with a few looks and even less words. How could we love a guy who would just torture and kill for any given government no matter what they stand for? that’s not what we are watching in “24”. Jack Bauer has a lot of contradictions in himself. Kiefer is able to show those. Jack goes beyond the president or any presidency, just like he goes beyond himself. And he suffers the consequences of what he feels needs to be done. He’s not free from guilt, definitely. A guilt the conservatives wouldn’t accept to be there at all. But it is in the show and in the character Jack Bauer, and that’s part of what transcends this show.
Report thisBy Lucas Marc, May 5, 2006 at 6:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
hi
Report thisI like your show. i like the action in it. I wach it all the time.
By Bruce, April 27, 2006 at 7:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m a big fan of 24 but I think you have to realize that it’s really a story about a secret agent. I think it’s both well written and well acted and I’ve noticed that every instance of torture is when there are thousands of lives at stake hours or minutes from the terrorist threat. Has a refreshing tone, nice guy just trying to get the job done and lots of action but it also gives equal coverage of the damage which happens when people go off on their own ideology with secrets and aliances. Part of that is “President Logan,” and the story goes that most of the terrorism in the story began with a wild plan by our own administration. Now that ought to attract any Bushbasher to Monday night on Fox channel.
Report thisBy Bob, April 27, 2006 at 7:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Exceptionally well-written work, Adam.
Report thisBy Vlade, April 27, 2006 at 11:49 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Adam, this was an amazingly well done article.
I wonder if Pat B. also picked up that 24’s bumbling, and corrupt idiot of a president mirrors a real life president?
God save us all from these clowns!
Report thisBy Ga, April 27, 2006 at 8:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Torture in real life is not as effective as the administration, its apologists or Buchanan would have us believe.”
But it works in movies!
This is so telling. It tells of the fantasy world generated by fiction that many people hold in their heads.
How many, do you think, in the Administration, in Congress, in the general public, actually read non-fiction? Books on history, law, philosophy, science?
How many of the same do you think read from more an one or two news sources? Watch one or two news stations? Listen to more than one or two radio shows?
We know that many of the compelling issues before us all are very complex and complicated. To understand something as complex as war, how it effects fighter, commander, enemy, community, culture… one MUST read and study a myriad of sources. We can not just go through life reading a few headlines a few hundred words, watching an hour or two on sunday morning.
Yet, many, oh so many, watch HOURS and HOURS every week watching TV and MOVIES and read Grishim and Patterson and whomever is on the NYT bestseller list. And every hour spent there is contributing to the immense stupidity of the American Poeple.
“Jack Bauer” is a fictionalized character. He was dreamed up in a writer’s head. His words have been written form him by a WRITER whose qualifications for understanding war is, need I say?, other WRITER’S words.
Sure, some fiction writers are from the “real world” before becoming writers, and some TV shows hire consultants, but overall, IT IS FICTION.
Report thisBy David Elkus, April 27, 2006 at 7:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
What a well written, thoroughly analyzed piece. Cool!
Report thisBy CitizenX, April 26, 2006 at 3:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Jack is also going after the President who had clearly broken the law, not protecting or making excuses for him. Despite Jacks flaws (torturer, murderer, etc) at least he is honorable.
Report thisBy relayer, April 26, 2006 at 12:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The “Republicans” who ask, “WWJD?” (what would Jack do?) reveal their simplistic attempts at thinking, their shallow conception of art and their willingness to grab any symbol and wave it to further their ideological ends, even when their actions are ludicrous to people “outside the loop.”.
One of the main points of “24” is to show that “extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice” leads inevitably to abuse of power.
Jack Bauer has shot an innocent woman, half-strangled his ex-wife, killed an ex-lover, viciously punched his close colleague, tortured innocent people… The “president” was involved in the plot which shot down Air Force 1, put the real President into a coma and thus manipulated himself illegitimately into the presidential seat, arranged for terrorists to gain control of nerve gas and is teetering on the edge of killing his own wife. The vice-president is involved. Military defense contractors are involved. The DHS is involved.
All these men are claiming their actions “are in the best interests of the American people.” When their actions are finally analysed, they are seen to be nothing more than raw attempts to seize power.
“24” is a metaphorically-viable examination of the very policies, distortions, illegalities and betrayals we see every day in the press and television. These current (mis)Administration policies are being mocked, disassembled and shown to be mere justification and sophistry for fanatic paranoids.
It’s hilarious that the very men whom this show is mocking take the lead character as a hero.
“What would Jack Bauer do?” Shoot the President, of course! And shoot anybody who got in the way of his ideological conclusions.
Come to think of it… Jack is the ultimate neo-con!
Report thisBy Ga, April 26, 2006 at 8:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am beginning to think that the problem with U.S. today—the neo-anti-intellectualism as it can be called but it is as old as the era of the “American Century”—is directly proportional to the amount of fictionalized American Culture.
Children were brought up by an “American Reader” in school that tells stories of George Washington and “the cherry tree” and how the Founding (Christian) Fathers fought for a country where “all men are created equal.” And that is the first lie for a country was created that was decidedly not equal in its laws however equal they wanted to be philosophically. (Some did know that more battles were to be fought by future generations.)
Skipping all of history to the present day we still have children being brought up on the stories of America rather than the history of America, where all attempts to bring truer, more factual history to our schools results is cries of “Liberal” and “Multiculturalism” and “Values under attack” and “War on Christianity.”
So, grown up on history as stories, with many lacking any real sense of real history in which the “American Hero” is actually not always a hero but your everyday, run of the mill guy fighting with his neighbors over natural resources, Americans naturally see MOVIES and TELEVISON as reflections of REALITY.
No box-office-block-buster-movie about the CIA or other American agency forays into foreign soil are accurate portrayals of American history.
All television show—CSI, Law & Order, ALIAS, 24, ad nauseum—are HORRIBLY WRONG in their portrayal of REALITY.
CSI is world where one can “zoom and enhance” on images of low resolution, and where magnets pick up lead. They can’t even get PHYSICAL REALITY correct much of the time.
Here is something to stick in your craw:
As children, we all learn that when you see a lightning flash, you count—one one thousand, two one thousand, three one thousand… before the BOOM!
Yet, NEVER, EVER, will you see a film portray that basic part of nature accurately. ALWAYS there is a simultaneous FLASH BOOM!
In film, swords always “shing” even going in and out of flesh; lead bullets always cause sparks; light bulbs always break in an array of sparkles; bullets always spray smoke and blood in entrance wounds; ... the list goes on and on.
Do you think for one second that the portrayal of American History in TV and FILM are any more accurate than the portrayal of physical reality?
TV and MOVIES are a GIANTIC FRAUD being foisted on and illtellecually-challanged American Populous.
There are some exceptions, of course. But they are rare and, worse, rarely seen.
Report thisBy Jamie Meyer, April 26, 2006 at 8:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Adam,
Robert sent me this in an email. It is very interesting and articulate. I hope that many will read this.
Your fan,
Report thisJamie
By Theodore, April 26, 2006 at 8:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
George Bush is to Jack Bauer as I am to Jesus.
Report thisBy Jim Baer, April 26, 2006 at 7:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
well done….thoughtful. difficult issues for our time…..no easy answers….but the discussion and thought process are very important.
Report thisBy JDF, April 26, 2006 at 4:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You are right on.!
Report thisVery good article.