Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change

The U.S. Military and the Unraveling of Africa

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Andy Borowitz: U.S. to Send One Troop to Iran

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 14, 2006

By Andy Borowitz

In an effort to punish the government of Iran for its nuclear ambitions, the Pentagon announced today that it was preparing to send one troop to Iran.

The troop, Private John R. Klugian, who is currently stationed at Fort Dix, could be deployed to Iran as early as next month, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld told reporters at the Pentagon.

For Mr. Rumsfeld, who has been criticized for not sending sufficient troops to Iraq, the decision to send only one troop to Iran seemed guaranteed to create even more controversy.

But the defense secretary used the better part of his Pentagon press briefing to explain that sending one troop, in this case Private Klugian, was more than enough to quell Iran’s nuclear threat.

“In the Army’s recruitment ads, they talk about an ‘Army of One,’” Mr. Rumsfeld said. “In the case of Iran, we are taking that literally.”

Advertisement

With U.S. troop levels stretched thin in Iraq and Afghanistan, sending Pvt. Klujian to deal with Iran on his own may have been a necessity, military analysts believe.

But Secretary Rumsfeld denied that by sending only one troop to Iran he was fighting the war there “on the cheap.”

“I am fully prepared to send one additional troop to help with the reconstruction,” he said.

Mr. Rumsfeld said that he fully expected his latest military strategy to come under fire from his detractors, but he had stern words of warning for those who would criticize it: “I would ask them to support our troop.”

Elsewhere, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie begged paparazzi to stop stalking them with ultrasound equipment.

www.creators.com


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Don Albert, May 1, 2006 at 7:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I can’t understand why everybody seems so hyped up over Iran having Nukes. We all know by now that bombs don’t kill people, people kill people.

Report this

By Tom, April 21, 2006 at 9:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I like obie’s idea of a nuclear suicide bomber - I nominate Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle.

Report this

By Kurt, April 20, 2006 at 2:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You dummies need to quit watching so much goddamn TV and look up “satire” in the dictionary.  Jesus, no wonder this country is going to hell in a handbasket with the dummies we have in the U.S.

Report this

By Druthers, April 20, 2006 at 7:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I loved the spelling and play on words of troop and trooper.  Webster away!

Report this

By John m Sandoval, April 19, 2006 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We very well know that George W Bush evaded going to war during Viet Nam by disappearing from his national guard unit, in Texas(using his father’s influence.)
We know that Rumsfeld and Bush are holding each other up by the seat of their pants.
We know that George Bush believes in making war - what he doesn’t believe in is going to War himself. Niether does (incapable) Rumsfeld, that’s why he is sending one solitary trooper to lay the groundwork for negotiations with Iran. George Bush is the worst president we have ever had - in the history of the United States of America.
He surrounds himself with people who promote his demented whims.
john m sandoval

Report this

By obie, April 19, 2006 at 11:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s a terrifying thought that maybe this is Rumsfields way to get in close with a form of our own ‘nuclear suicide bomber’. I wouldn’t put it past him….....

Report this

By Shannon Jacobs, April 19, 2006 at 6:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It seems to be two troops, or one trooper with two names. Okay, so maybe a humorist shouldn’t be held to the same spelling standards?

Report this

By Mark, April 18, 2006 at 9:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hey Frank just because you know some obscure and insignificant grammatical fact does not give you the grounds to call out Borowitz.  Borowitz is your daddy, and so am I.

Report this

By sawbux, April 18, 2006 at 11:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop
troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop troop

Report this

By Quy Tran, April 16, 2006 at 7:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why don’t we send Rumsfelf himself to Iran so we can save Private Klugian ?

Report this

By rachelle, April 16, 2006 at 3:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Funny you should say that, Frank, that was the first thought that came to mind. Just how many soldiers would be going? A group of soldiers or…just one?

The topic is tongue-in-cheek anyway.

Report this

By Lynn, April 15, 2006 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

No army can run on just a private, there need at least to be one accompanying general.

Could we have this general’s name please so that we can look out for his call to oust Rumsfeld once that said general has retired.

Report this

By Frank, April 15, 2006 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Andy, a ‘troop’ is a group of soldiers in a unit, not an individual. A ‘trooper’ is an individual in a troop, though ‘trooper’ is more often used to describe police officers rather than military personnel, with the exception of ‘paratroopers’.

A single soldier is called….a soldier.

You might want to Webster these military words before you use them smile

Report this

By Colonel, April 15, 2006 at 10:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If Rummy holds true to form, the one troop he sends to Iran will be backed up with intelligence from the neocon Office of Special Plans. And maybe the one troop will even be supplied with body armor.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.