![]() |
|
||
|
The Cure for Executive ExcessPosted on Feb 9, 2006By Molly Ivins Once upon a time, in the middle of a nasty constitutional crisis in Washington, a most unlikely hero emerged—a lawyer from one of Texas’ notoriously discriminated-against racial minorities. Think how lucky we were. It is one of the most famous sentences in all of American rhetoric: “My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total.” But what catches the eye today is the sentence that followed that famous declaration, the sentence that makes one so ashamed for Al Gonzales. Barbara Jordan’s great, deep voice brought the impeachment hearings against Richard Nixon to an awed silence when she vowed, “And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution.” Thirty years ago, this state could produce Barbara Jordan—and now we send that pathetic pipsqueak Al Gonzales. Enough to provoke a wailing cry of “O tempera, O mores!” even from the depths of Lubbock. As a New York Times editorial succinctly put it, Attorney General Gonzales’ Judiciary Committee appearance was a “daylong display of cynical hair-splitting, obfuscation, disinformation and stonewalling.” How fortunate that Republicans running the committee did not insist the chief law enforcement officer of the United States take an oath before testifying. God forbid that he should actually be held to the truth. I realize it’s a cliche for those of us who remember the Beach Boys to mourn the days when giants roamed the Earth and all was on a grander and finer scale. But I knew Barbara Jordan, and I know Al Gonzales, and it is damned depressing—he’s too lightweight to even be a mediocrity.It seems to me the trumpery excuse for a hearing raised graver issues than those of 30 years ago. Gonzales kept trying to frame the issue as a question of whether or not a domestic spying program without warrants is illegal—in fact, it is against the law. Gonzales maintained that the law is superseded by some unwritten constitutional power due the president during time of war and further that Congress had authorized warrantless spying when giving the president the authority to invade Afghanistan. Strange, so few who voted for invading Afghanistan recall having warrantless spying in mind. One problem of legal logic is to “define war.” We have not been attacked by another nation—in fact, we were clearly the aggressors against Iraq. We were attacked by a private group of ideological zealots led by a Saudi millionaire. This war—against no nation, flag or territory—can presumably last indefinitely, like our wars against drugs and crime. Barbara Jordan observed: “[Impeachment] is designed to ‘bridle’ the executive if he engages in excesses…. The Framers confined in the Congress the power, if need be, to remove the president in order to strike a delicate balance between a president swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive…. ‘A president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the Constitution.’ ” Nixon was accused, among other things, of misuse of the CIA. I highly recommend James Risen’s new book, “State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration.” Risen is the New York Times reporter who broke the story of the National Security Agency spying scandal. “In public life, as in kindergarten, the all-important word is no. We are living with the consequences of the inability to say no to the president’s war of choice with Iraq, and we shall soon see how Congress and the courts will respond to the latest challenge from the White House—the claim by President Bush that he has the right to ignore FISA’s prohibition of government intrusion on the private communications of Americans without a court order and his repeated statements that he intends to go right on doing it.” The time is coming when someone will have to say no. Sadly, I have a vision of the impeachment panel, and I see Tom DeLay in the seat once occupied by the great Barbara Jordan. Previous item: Cartoon Protests Stoked by Dictators Next item: An Olympic Athlete With No Tragic History? That Won't Do! Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Tomack, February 16, 2006 at 12:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Molly, you knock my socks off. Please, never stop writing because we need every ounce of reason we can get—and more importantly, deliver to the American public. We must hope beyond hope that every once in a while a fence sitter will read words like these and jump to the side of REASON.
Barry, (#3818) I have been “preaching” the same message for so long my friends and family finish my sentences. Well said.
Impeachment deserved? Yes. Will it happen? No. Why? Not because we are ashamed, but because the current admin and party rule amounts to the largest, best organized, and most Intent criminal organization ever assembled in the history of human-kind. To some I may overstate, to my ears I underrate.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, February 16, 2006 at 2:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Petty-minded Bush and Cheney should be sent back to school so they can learn the wisdom of heavyweight Americans like Benjamin Franklin who warned, “They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Report thisOn the other hand, James Madison understood how seductive the claims of national security could be, pointing out that wartime is “the true nurse of executive aggrandizement.” Bush-Cheney are claiming “more power than King George III had at the time of the Revolution,” as Bruce Fein asserted recently.
The war in Iraq and Afghanistan was about Bush-Cheney self-aggrandazement. And since 9/11 was the justification for these wars, the question should be asked, “Who stood to benefit most from 9/11?” I believe that 9/11 was staged by Bush & gang! Let’s remember that 9/11 was not fully investigated. The atmosphere of fear created by this tragic event, still casts a heavy smokescreen over the whole episode.
By Barrie Johnson, February 15, 2006 at 1:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
30 odd years ago there was a distinct separation of church and state. today, there is not. beginning in the early 1970s organized religion led the faithful into the republican party. [look up “THE GOOD NEWS”] the faithful are unable to question their leadership(that would be like questioning god) and so vote a straight republican ticket against their own best interests. effectively god joined the republican party and who can vote against god. the republican base is 3 part; the rich who vote on money issues, the religious who vote on religious issues and the patriot rednecks who vote for their assault rifles. each is a single issue tunnel visioned voter. deadly dangerous to a democracy. the outpouring of religious emotion coupled with an endless money supply is enough to defeat any attempt to restore moderation in this country. I fear for the future of our country. Barrie Johnson .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Report thisBy Amanda Williams, February 15, 2006 at 12:03 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We’re stuck with 2 parties. The Republicans follow Cheney/Bush like horny dogs after a bitch. The Democrats have rolled over and are playing dead. What’s left? Any aging hippies ready to hit the streets again? Power to the People before we ALL wind up in Gitmo!
Report thisBy G. Anderson, February 12, 2006 at 10:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Molly, Molly, Molly, you’ve got guts…of this I have no doubt. Yes, as you succinctly pointed out, our attorney general is a “pimpsqueak”, a tiny man, whose ability to prevaricate seems to be his only skill.
That he’s of the same stature of president Bush is no surprise. For, how could any of Bush’s “little men”, rise to a level higher than, the great imposter himself - Mr. Bush.
All this adminstration can do,from Cheny on down, is try to buy time for themselves, via stonewalling, in the hope that, their plan for a new America succeeds, before anyone can do anything about it.
By then American will not be the place of freedom, and of giants like Sam Irvin, and Barbara Jordan.. But of little men with little rules, and big lies, used to rationalise the fruits of their policies.
Report thisBy poboxgz@yahoo.com, February 11, 2006 at 9:57 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I think the reason so few have come forward for impeachment is the deep sense of shame we all feel for not having thrown the rogue out a whole lot sooner!
Report thisKeep the faith, Molly.
By Pat, February 10, 2006 at 10:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The most significant way America can reduce international tensions and reduce fear of terrorism is to promote bilateral support for immediately removing Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzalez, ..... from paid government responsibilities.
Rapid removal of these evil-doers is the only sign America can give the world that we are serious about reducing international war and terrorism.
Compelling justifications for immediate removal include illegal invasions, torture, corporate corruption, tax cuts for the rich, degraded public education, sale of government responsibility to lobbists, treason through outing our own undercover agents, patronage for incompetents at Homeland Security with disasterous results, lying to grand juries and the legislature, domestic wiretapping & surveillance, massive national debt, decreased quality of life and for preying on the prejude of ignorant, naive supporters for blind support and selfishly causing them to betray the basic values of their Savior.
Report thisBy gary johnson, February 10, 2006 at 12:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Molly Ivins once again proves there is hope for journalism in this country. If the wimps in Congress can’t bring themselves to do the right thing and proceed with impeachment hearings, they only cement their place in history as the representatives who allowed a piece of work like George W to trample the Constitution without first even reading it.
Report thisBy Don Albert, February 10, 2006 at 12:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Regarding government wiretapping:
It seems to me that if Democrates are perceived as being weak on national security,it follows that wiretapping the DNC headquarters and any other entity supporting Democratic candidates for political office would be justified to insure national security.
Report thisBy Randolph Nesbitt, February 10, 2006 at 12:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Please don’t stop saying the I-word. Perhaps it will catch on. Who knows. Stranger things have happened. 2 planes slammed into the World Trade Center Twin Towers and brought them down contrary to all the laws of physics. A man stole the presidency two times in a row. Congress gave one man the power to take the U.S. into war. The U.S. attacked a nation based upon lies. The Attorney General lies to Congress. The media reports what the President’s minions want to be reported. If the President wakes up in the middle of the night and God speaks to him and tells him you are an enemy combatant you will be picked up and whisked away without rights and more than likely taken to another country that has no problem torturing for profit. So who knows. . . stranger things.
Please see some of my poetry at the Poets Against the War website:
Report thishttp://www.poetsagainstthewar.org/displaypoem.asp?AuthorID=7345#453081571
(this one is especially pertinent regarding impeachment - I’m still allowed to dream aren’t I? or has that freedom been taken away?)
By Carol Rose, February 10, 2006 at 12:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Molly - once again you bring the light of sanity into the murky depths. America owes all honest journalists a huge debt, and someday I hope to see you, and many deserving others getting your Nobels and Pulitzers on stories written about this administration and it’s “war”. Keep on diggin’, girl!!!
Report thisBy Jerry Bartron, February 9, 2006 at 9:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Thank you Molly Ivins. Keep up your great work.
Report this