LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
July 25, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * Six Little Words

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Nikki Keddie on Iran

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar
The Media Monopoly

The Media Monopoly

By Ben Bagdikian
$12.92

more items

 
Reports

Exit Howard Stern, Enter Possibility

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 9, 2006

By James Harris

Ever since he announced his departure from the terrestrial radio world, Howard Stern has been on a very public crusade against alleged censorship by the company that employed him, Infinity Broadcasting, and by the Federal Communications Commission. Now, Stern insists that he wants to operate in a world free of restrictions on what the FCC considers indecent speech. As Stern debuts his program on Sirius Satellite Radio this week the hype will end and the real drama will unfold. Stern’s personal vendetta against two organizations may wake up radio audiences nationwide to the fact that terrestrial radio is more boring and unoriginal than ever and may popularize the previously unthinkable: paid radio.

If you haven’t heard, there’s a new technology on the block. Sirius and XM are competing satellite radio companies, with a combined total of more than 200 channels of talk and music that aren’t regulated by the FCC (a government organization aimed at regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable). Howard Stern isn’t the only guy with a show. There are other major players who think satellite radio isn’t just the flavor of the month. The NBA, the NFL and Major League Baseball all have deals with Sirius. Martha Stewart has a show. Rapper Eminem is on too. NPR and Disney both provide content to the network. You can even hear Oscar hopeful Philip Seymour Hoffman rock to the tune of “Sawbones.”

It’s another delivery system for content, and that content could have a huge impact. Many have said satellite radio is to terrestrial radio what cable was to regular TV. The analogy is a good one in that Sirius and XM managed to duck the censorship tape of the lately eager-to-ban-everything FCC. In a December 2004 ruling the FCC said “it will not extend rules prohibiting obscene and offensive programming on the public airwaves to satellite, or paid, radio.” CNN reported that “the FCC signal came in the form of a letter ... that declined a request by a Los Angeles radio station owner to amend satellite radio licensing rules to include an obscenity provision.” The station owner, Saul Levine, filed the petition with the FCC after hearing Stern’s pledges to (1) leave his then-employer, Infinity Broadcasting, (2) stick it to radio group Clear Channel, and (3) flourish on satellite waves that would be as free as the summer of love. 

So enters the rest of the world on a drama, already in progress, that promises mudslinging, name-calling and numerous mentions of the word censorship. Stern has willingly cut his listener base by 80% and moved to a technology platform about which few Americans are aware. 

He has come a long way since being fired from his college station for an allegedly racist skit, leaving a Washington, D.C., station after a dispute over show content, and being fired from a New York station for what has become known as classic Stern material. Throughout fines, suspensions and firings, Stern has managed to build a media empire over the past 20 years. His potty-mouth radio antics grew his audience to over 12 million daily listeners and banked Infinity Broadcasting, the distributor of the show, about $100 million per year. 

As of Jan. 9, 2006, Sirius will write Stern a $100-million check each year for the next five years. Stern’s promise: He will deliver an increasing number of subscribers to the growing satellite network. Since the announcement of his move to Sirius in October 2004, Sirius has jumped from 600,000 to 3 million subscribers and XM, which had been well ahead in subscription numbers, has seemingly stood still.

The early projections suggest that Stern might be able to deliver on his promise. Mel Karmazin, Sirius CEO and former Viacom president, believes that Stern will be the talent that leads the satellite network out of debt and into the black. 

The potential for Stern to freely entertain his audience is splendid, but the opportunity for media consumers to engage in an introspective evaluation of American media is far more important. Stern’s departure from his radio throne forces a necessary question about modern media, Clear Channel and Infinity Broadcasting in particular: Does commercial radio choke the life and creativity out of content? 

Stern’s program is by no means an example of what is good and right in media, or for that matter stimulating, thoughtful content. In fact, many consider Stern’s mouth to be the most vile to ever have spit on a radio microphone. However, his sometimes racist and usually raunchy humor is no more objectively “obscene” than other content that routinely dominates the airwaves.

On CNN’s “Larry King Live,” Stern said “we no longer have to sit and worry about programming to the masses. FCC. We don’t care! Religious right. Government interference, gone.” Stern’s comment to King spoke volumes about some of the more practical concerns I have about the regulation of traditional radio. In 2004, Clear Channel took it upon itself—some said in an attempt to please the conservatives—to remove Stern from its stations. Clear Channel CEO John Hogan said at that time: “Clear Channel drew a line in the sand today with regard to protecting our listeners from indecent content and Howard Stern’s show blew right through it. It was vulgar, offensive, and insulting, not just to women and African-Americans but to anyone with a sense of common decency.”

How big was that “line in the sand”?

In that same year Clear Channel radio stations nationwide gave thousands of spins to the song “Get Low” by Lil’ Jon & the Eastside Boyz. It was a Southern rap hit that swept the nation thanks in large part to radio groups like Clear Channel and Infinity. The lyrics?  Simply mind-numbing. 

To the window, to the wall,
To the sweat drop down my balls
To all these bitches crawl…
Now give me my doe back and go get ya friend
Stupid bitch standing there while I’m drinking my hen

Of course while playing “Get Low” radio stations used the appropriate bleeps and censoring devices when those nasty little words that shouldn’t be heard on radio waves came up, but how well does the bleep function work when my 8-year-old niece asks me, “What are balls?”

I use these lyrics only to ask how it’s possible for Clear Channel—and other broadcasters—to exclude one clearly raunchy act (Stern) and permit an equally if not more horrific set of song lyrics? Or how the FCC can ignore clearly offensive music pumped into the minds of school-aged children on public radio waves but spend countless hours chasing down a shock jock for saying “blowjob”?  I consider the two equally offensive, but the FCC’s witch-hunting tactics have thrown everyone into a frenzy of uncertainty.

It’s my hope that through Stern’s railing against Clear Channel, Infinity and the FCC audiences will see that to the FCC and companies like Clear Channel it’s not what you say but who’s saying what to whom. It seems fine that rapper Snoop Dogg can say bitch as many times as he wants as long as his audience isn’t too rich or too big. There seems to be no consistency in what’s acceptable, and that’s not fair to Stern or to the public.

You may hate Howard Stern for being indecent or racist or tasteless but I hate regulatory commissions that fail to clearly define acceptability and find it permissible to silence anyone or anything that doesn’t fit into a make-it-up-as-you-go-along handbook on decency. Current regulations standing, satellite will provide a much needed shelter from the whim of the FCC and make the government-controlled commission reconsider its rules for policing content.

Being that I work for both traditional and satellite radio, lately friends and family have asked me whether Howard Stern can make satellite radio mainstream. To them and to you I say that I hope he can. 

Stern’s exit gave a much needed push to terrestrial radio; now execs who have been comfortable using one man to program eight radio stations must try to maintain—maybe win over—an audience that now has a choice in what it will listen to on the way to work. Stern’s very public move to Sirius has spread the word to the world about the technology, and I must guess that’s what Karmazin is rooting for. Sirius won’t be the lone beneficiary, for I believe that the competitor, XM, will benefit from the buzz as well. Stern has brought an idea, satellite radio, to the masses—something he’s very good at doing. So will satellite radio become mainstream? Maybe not as mainstream as Jessica Simpson, but it will certainly affect the mainstream’s bottom line—and that just might be enough. Infinity Broadcasting has already responded to Stern’s exodus with its “FREE-FM” campaign, which was launched this month and is hosted by former “Love Lines” funny man Adam Corolla. After listening for a week, I can’t help but think: The FREE-FM morning show campaign against the $12.95-a-month subscription fee that Sirius charges sounds a lot like “The Howard Stern Show.” Surprising? No. But perhaps it’s just the start of a series of coming changes for radio networks.

Now that Stern has “birthed” Sirius, the masses can, for a monthly fee, tune in to unregulated, raunchy-as-it-wants-to-be radio content. It is my hope that satellite radio not only becomes another viable means to deliver content but that it encourages the masses to demand more from the media and from themselves. If people embrace media such as the Internet and satellite—outlets not entirely beholden to advertisers—we all might get a glimpse of what Neo saw in “The Matrix”: a world free of boundaries. As Stern said, “you can download it [up to 125 channels of music and talk programming], you can carry it with you. The show all the time, uncensored, less commercial time—this technology is going to blow people away.”

Stern makes a good point; radio network chiefs should think about it, get together and draft a memo that starts something like this:

Sirius competition expected.  Keep the ideas fresh and coming fast.

Some Useful Links

  • History of the FCC
  • About the Sat Casters: Sirius and XM
  • CNN: Stern Free to Be Raunchy on Sirius

  • Correction: This article stated that Major League Baseball signed a contract with Sirius, this was incorrect. Major League Baseball broadcasts on XM radio. The NHL has a deal with Sirius. (Thank you to our readers for pointing this out.)

    Email Newsletter

    Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

    Previous item: Allen's Auteur Dilemma

    Next item: Betraying the Reagan Revolution

    Jump to Comments

    Advertisement


    Elsewhere: .

    Comments

    Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

    By Susan Block, January 14, 2006 at 5:07 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    What do Howard Stern and Muqtada al-Sadr have in common? Both were censored by the US government, Stern for “indecency,” Sadr for “insurgency.” The “in” words.

    Both are charismatic egomaniacs revered by loads of young, testosterone-pumping guys who, for various reasons, don’t get laid enough. Both haven’t been taken too seriously by their professional peers. Now, thanks to the brass-knuckled hand of American expurgation, both are enjoying the dubious honor of being living martyrs in their respective cultures. Censorship works in mysterious ways…

    Report this

    By Avery Thomas, January 12, 2006 at 9:58 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Actually, if you change something for good, typically that means the change will be long standing, not necessarily “good” as in “good vs. evil.” Sarcasm is only good when it makes sense Steven.

    Anyway, I have listened to Stern a lot this week.  I like the direction of his show, but I must disagree with the evaluation of Adam Carolla’s show.  It is formatted very much like Stern’s, but I would be less than honest if I said he wasn’t funny.  Perhaps Stern’s departure might encourage other radio companies to do more in the way of promoting young talent and in shuffling new voices onto the airwaves?

    Report this

    By Dalton, January 12, 2006 at 8:12 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Maybe it would do well to remember what a very wise man said about profanity:  “Foul language is the pitiful attempt of a feeble mind to express itself forcefully.”

    Perhaps it can also be said by extension that foul language is most likely to find listeners among the feeble-minded.

    Report this

    By Steven Domingos, January 11, 2006 at 1:42 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I apologise, but I have to point out about the essay’s capsule:

    “Howard Stern’s move to Sirius just might change the radio business for good. But will the change be for the better? James Harris reports.”

    I get to ask a funny question, you see: Will a change for good be better? It’s silly to point out, I know, but there you have it.

    Report this

    By Just Jim, January 11, 2006 at 10:27 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I,m a communications professional, having spent over 35 years in public relations, and a liberal.
    I appreciate Howard Stern breaking down some language barriers, like Lenny Bruce did back in the 60’s.  I just don’t think that the continuous use of raunchy, crude language contributes any value to our society, and that primal language elevates people’s humanity and life condition.  It’s too bad that so many people feel the need to spend precious time to be mired in primordial mud of shock radio than spending that time to cultivate a higher life condition.  It’s no wonder that this country’s society has reverted back to the Dark Ages.

    Report this

    By R. A. Earl, January 10, 2006 at 9:23 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Censorship is far more ugly and dangerous than ANYTHING Stern can spew.

    The obvious and profound HYPOCRISY that infects the American psyche astonishes me. I can’t believe there are so many ready to scream FREEDOM, FREEDOM, FREEDOM… and then fight to be first to condemn, censor, regulate, control and intimidate ANYTHING or ANYONE they decide to demonize and eschew, which is anything that doesn’t fit with their Disney-esque, Ozzie & Harriet image they have of their society and culture.

    Where else but America could a person with a mouth full of shit get paid $100,000,000 a year to spit it all over anyone dumb enough to listen?

    Report this

    By david simpson, January 10, 2006 at 11:25 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Great article. We would all be better served if the FCC were closed down. At least then there would be no pretense of regulation. It is scandalous - indeed immoral - what the FCC has permitted to transpire.

    Report this

    By Mark Overton, January 10, 2006 at 11:00 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I am the biggest Stern fan ever and a proud Sirius user.

    I like that this article talks plainly and truthfully about the mundane and unoriginal nature of “traditional” radio.  Most radio heads think Sirius is a threat.  I think it’s long overdue competition for stations that have given us mostly garbage for the past couple of years.

    Report this

    By Stephen Revere, January 9, 2006 at 11:50 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I wonder if we can get Sirius to carry “Democracy Now!” too. smile

    Report this

    By Kevin, January 9, 2006 at 4:11 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Just to mention:
    “The NBA, the NFL and Major League Baseball all have deals with Sirius.”

    I don’t know about the others, but I do know that MLB has its deal with XM, not Sirius.

    Report this

    By John Bridges, January 9, 2006 at 3:06 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    The article points to many of the problems I see with, not only radio, but TV as well.  I am afraid to let my daughter watch TV for fear that she will see something that kids just shouldn’t see. 

    It goes without saying that I would never let her listen to Stern.  But the author makes a good point in saying the Stern is just the tip of the iceberg.  The song lyrics mentioned in this article are abhorrent and I cannot believe they play that kind of music on the radio.

    I guess the world is moving too fast for me. 

    Any thoughts on whether satellite is a good buy right now?

    Report this

    Add Your Comment

    Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
    are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






    Notify you when others comment on this article?


    Are you a human?
    Retype the word you see here.


    Please read and abide by our comment policy.
    By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

    Newsletter

    Get Truthdig in your inbox

    Privacy Policy

     
    Click here to advertise with Truthdig
     

     
    Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
    Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.