![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Jabari Asim: Racial and Sexual PoliticsPosted on Oct 29, 2006By Jabari Asim WASHINGTON—I remember my first time. I was 18. There were a lot of other folks doing it in the same room, no doubt experiencing that same mixture of excitement and trepidation I felt. And, like any young, vulnerable person, I was consumed by troubling questions: What if I made the wrong choice? What if it wasn’t all it was cracked up to be? Would I respect myself in the morning? I’m talking about voting, of course. You probably already knew this if you’ve seen those televised public service announcements featuring actresses such as Angie Harmon and Felicity Huffman. The “My First Time’’ spots, aimed at motivating single women voters, were produced by a nonpartisan group called “Women’s Voices. Women Vote.” In the segments, actresses talk about casting ballots with the kind of come-hither candor not usually associated with going to the polls. “It’s kind of personal,’’ says Harmon during her spot. You get the impression she doesn’t really want to talk about it, but then you discover she’s just being coy. “I did a lot of research on positions that I liked,’’ she goes on to say, presumably so she wouldn’t just hop into bed, so to speak, with the first candidate who came along. Huffman and the other performers confess to feeling “pretty,” “sexy” and “grown up” after voting. The announcements, visible on YouTube and at the organization’s website, www.wvwv.org, send what first appears to be an oddly confusing message. What are their intended viewers supposed to learn from watching them? That they can hook up at the polls? Not quite, according to the website: “Saw the ad? Now take action!” Visitors are informed that “in 2004, nearly 20 million unmarried women did not cast ballots on Election Day,” before being urged: “Don’t let it happen again!” Ah, you gotta love those exclamation points. But maybe the conflation of sex and voting is not so weird after all. Voting is a form of exercising one’s power as a citizen of our fair republic. Sex is never far from our notions of power—nor from the corridors of power, as pols of various persuasions manage to demonstrate with some regularity. Still, suggestively blending the two remains a curious way of encouraging people to do their civic duty. A couple of years ago the hip-hop entrepreneur P. Diddy urged young people to “vote or die.” These “Women’s Voices. Women Vote.’’ ads seem to invite people to vote and get ... lucky. Despite the civic boosterism of the spots, they seem close in spirit to those late-night commercials aimed at lonely men. You know, the ones with the fetching femme fatales: “Looking for a friend? Call me.” The tawdry aura of those commercials reared its ugly head in a recent GOP ad aimed at Harold Ford Jr., a Tennessee Democrat whose principal claim to fame until recently was winning his House seat the old-fashioned way: He inherited it. But now the younger Ford is threatening to take a Senate seat that once was regarded as safely in the GOP column. He’s also an African-American in the South, a region that has declined to show much support for Senate candidates like him in the nearly 130 years since the end of Reconstruction. But Ford, an opponent of same-sex marriage, late-term abortions and other progressive priorities, cannot be tarred as a typical namby-pamby liberal. All of this makes Republicans nervous, which probably explains the vicious television ad, which has been pulled from the airwaves but is still accessible on YouTube. It concludes with a white woman mentioning that she met Ford at a party hosted by Playboy magazine. She beams an insinuating glance at the camera while urging the candidate to get in touch. “Harold, call me,’’ she coos. If manipulating the white South’s historical distaste for interracial couplings isn’t an example of extreme campaigning, then consider this ad running in two dozen congressional districts. The commercial, allegedly designed to turn African-Americans away from the Democrats, features two black men discussing that party’s support of a woman’s right to choose. “If you make a little mistake with one of your ‘hos,’ you’ll want to dispose of that problem tout de suite, no questions asked,” one man advises. But the other is unpersuaded. “That’s too cold. I don’t snuff my own seed,” he replies. Ready with a comeback, the first man suggests, “Maybe you do have a reason to vote Republican.” Sure, campaign strategists have stooped to ever-lower of depths of tastelessness and insult. But it’s not the first time. Jabari Asim’s e-mail address is asimj(at symbol)washpost.com. Previous item: Andy Borowitz: Bush Proposes Making Illegal Immigrants 'Guest Voters' Next item: Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Looking Past One-Party Rule Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Valerie, November 1, 2006 at 7:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I registered to vote 33 years ago. For most of that time, I was a single woman. During that time, I failed to vote in one election.
Report thisBy Sexy Senior Citizen, October 31, 2006 at 1:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Re: Comment #35176 by Sally A. Bridges on 10/30
Sally, you speak of sex as tawdry. Perhaps it is for you if your hormones are not quite normal. Try to vote without sex. It only lasts one generation. You may get several votes in, but you will get no babies out. Soon grandmothers and grandfathers would disappear. Candidates would disappear, as would Presidents and Congressmen and even Congresswomen, who don’t have sex. Kings, Queens and Jelly Beans would all be passé. If all the inventors and entrepreneurs should decide that sex was too tawdry for decent people, there would soon be no TV, automobiles or overpriced boats. Business would come to a screeching and we would never have to worry again about global warming or endangered species. It would cure man’s war making, his lying, and cheating heart.
Why don’t you package it as Nosexatol and take it every day for the rest of your life. Politicians would stop sexing things up and then sexing the voters.
Report thisBy Michele S., October 30, 2006 at 4:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I disagree with Jabari Asim. I was scared and excited and single and female the first time I voted as a college student in 1976. No one had ever told me how to vote, and I don’t mean for whom, I mean the method. I didn’t know if there would be big machines with levers or contraptions that I wouldn’t know how to use. I was afraid of being humiliated. It was absolutely similar to thinking about having sex for the first time.
Single women tend not to vote. The strategy to make voting sexy (and safe) could be exactly the right way to get more women to the polls. The message of this spot is “don’t be afraid”. It couldn’t be more different from the “be very afraid”, racially exploitive ads Jabari Asim sites.
Report thisBy Sally A. Bridges, October 30, 2006 at 1:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
When parties resort to this level of sleaze, you know that they are desperate. It’s hard to believe that anyone could be taken in by such tactics, but many people are. This also proves that these people believe that sex is the answer to everything these days. I think we all need to get our minds out from between our legs and start to look at things in a less tawdry way. We are literally made to believe that everything is related to being sexual beings, first, and cerebral beings, second. I’m afraid that is one of the tools that the elite power structure on this planet is using. If they can appeal to our basest instincts, then they can control our thinking. The only tactic that is more powerful is fear. Hegel had it right: Set up the opposing forces and those who are pulling the strings will gain thier ends.
Report this