|
|||
|
Marie Cocco: Last Refuge of the RepublicansPosted on Oct 16, 2006By Marie Cocco WASHINGTON—Time to talk taxes. Where else could congressional Republicans possibly find refuge? Not in talking about Iraq. Not, in the aftermath of the Mark Foley scandal, in gay-bashing. Perhaps not even in the Medicare prescription drug program, since millions of elderly beneficiaries are now smack in the middle of the “doughnut hole’’ that keeps them paying monthly premiums while they receive no coverage until they spend thousands in out-of-pocket costs for medicine. So it’s back to basics. Or, as President Bush crisply puts it, “The Democrats will raise taxes. ... They’re going to raise them on whoever they can raise them on.’‘ It’s true that Democrats have made their distaste for the Bush tax cuts well known. In particular, they think it would be a breathtaking folly—another one, that is—to extend the cuts beyond their current expiration dates. Making permanent the tax cuts enacted since 2001 would have a direct cost of $2.8 trillion over the next decade. Adding interest costs on the ballooning national debt puts the price tag at $3.3 trillion, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank that relies on data from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. This is about three times what it would take to fix the entire 75-year shortfall in Social Security that the president has said he’s so concerned about. Advertisement One result is that we’re now waging wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and putting the tab on a credit card. The $432 billion appropriated for these two conflicts since 2001 will be due one day—paid for by future taxpayers who will be living in a world that will be gripped, no doubt, by new and different threats. So, if some Democratic candidate for Congress stood up somewhere and said: “Yes, I think there should be a tax hike to pay for these wars so that the children of the veterans and the orphans of those who’ve fallen aren’t burdened with our unpaid bills,’’ would a Republican opponent attack? Probably. As a group, Republicans take great comfort in knowing they haven’t been forced to choose. They’ve enacted a vast new Medicare benefit but they’ve not been forced to cut other programs or raise anyone’s taxes to pay for it. They’ve handed the Pentagon everything it desires, and not groused much at the obscene waste uncovered in audits of the reconstruction boondoggle in Iraq. It is always Christmas for someone on Capitol Hill, whether it’s big energy companies extracting this or that tax break or brazen lobbyists who write their industries a check by literally writing self-dealing language into legislation. Somewhere along the line, though, the public seems to have become queasy. The average person can’t comprehend why we can lavish billions of tax benefits on stock investors, but can’t build levees to protect New Orleans. No one can quite figure out why we still have to shed our shoes at the airport, when we still haven’t come up with the money to inspect checked luggage for bombs. The public understands that to govern is to choose. The White House and its Republican helpmates thought they could slip out from under this maxim, and for a while they did. One reason they return now to the tried and true theme about tax-raising Democrats is that they know congressional Democrats will, if they take control, force some hard choices. And given a choice between protecting millionaires and protecting Medicare, which side would the public choose? This really is the fundamental problem confronting Republicans as the Nov. 7 elections approach. It is not just that they’ve governed badly, endorsing without much inquiry just about any wrongheaded White House initiative. It’s that they’ve refused to make choices—to govern—at all. Previous item: Andy Borowitz: Mel Gibson Acquires Nuclear Weapon Next item: Jabari Asim: Marriage, Hip-Hop Style CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By John C. Bonser, October 17, 2006 at 3:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The GOP was seduced by a group that places much more emphasis on ideology than facts. We have no idea as to how badly they have damaged our nation.
Report thisBy felicity, October 17, 2006 at 1:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Will Democrats rise to the occasion? The Republican message, perhaps their only message, will be Democrats will raise your taxes.
Have Democratic operatives figured out that to combat this slogan they must offer the voters an alternative. Democrats will stop the give-away to the rich, legislate tax cuts for child-care costs, lower interest rates on college tuition loans, to mention a few. It is so simple a message, but depending on Democrats to deliver it seems, at this point, a pie in the sky.
Report thisBy omfg, October 17, 2006 at 11:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
they have destroyed decades of progressive reforms and set this country back 200 years.
Worse, they have destroyed everything the United States ever stood for.
Face it. This country will never recover from the damage. I predict ultimately, the union will gradually break up and we will see the rebirth of uber-local government…at the micro level.
This society will require re-definition and re-building from the ground up if humans are ever to survive.
Report thisBy bb, October 17, 2006 at 11:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Deep Shit rabblerouzer (above)
Congratulations! I am copying and printing your comments onto fine paper, framing it and putting it in a conspicuous place on my wall!
Greater truth was never spoken—every word of it!
From an old, old, woman who loves the truth!
Report thisBy OCPatriot, October 17, 2006 at 8:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush and his Administration now have demonstrated and instituted the worst of all liberal traits. The first is their “spend and spend” policies, with no end in sight as our President promises aid to Lebanon, with no respect for the conservative philosophy of reducing our debt, not increasing it. I suggest that “spend and spend” is more liberal than tax and spend. And make no mention of the fact that our government, under this Administration, has created the largest deficit ever and the most debt, ever. For holders of assets, such as myself, this “spend and spend” policy (in pursuit of the “Bush doctrine”) will mean that our government issued bonds will be worth less and less, and this will drag our economy down and make us vulnerable to holders of these bonds, such as the Chinese. Putting the war expenses on a credit card further hides the growing debt. Taxes also get pushed down to state and local governments as they struggle to pay for needed programs, let alone pork. The other area that you haven’t mentioned, in which Bush and his Administration is incontestably “liberal” is in his unfettered growth of government; it cannot be contested that our government is now the biggest it has ever been. This is very liberal, I’m afraid “big government” is now a hallmark of a Republican administration; I never thought I’d see a “spend and spend” and “create Big Government” Republican administration. A good friend, a staunch capitalist, recently wrote me: “At heart I am a liberterian. I think Bush is Lyndon Johnson Jr. guns & butter.. The only voices I hear in Congress for more financial responsibility are from a minority of the Republicans, nothing from the Democrats. I do agree power corrupts.
Report thisI dont like deficet spending either by individuals or by governments. Deficet spending almosts always weakens the borrower in the long run.”
By KISS, October 17, 2006 at 6:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Oh Marie, They have made choices, albeit all the wrong choices. They have feathered their nests quite nicely, along with their rich brethren. Why would someone like me, on Medicare and at poverty level, be helped when that yacht could be a nice tax write off for one of the wealthy? While I may have a couple of bucks for a political contribution, nowhere could I be of significants as the one who pony’s up a few hundred thousand. It’s called priorities.
Report thisBy rabblerowzer, October 17, 2006 at 5:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Deep Shit
Even if Democrats take control of Congress in 06 and the Whitehouse in 08, nobody in their right mind will be singing Happy days are here again, for decades. I hope all Americans have supercharged their endurance batteries enough during our six year corruption binge to climb out of the Death Valley sized pit we have stumbled into. The last six years have been a gentle breeze compared to the economic typhoons looming in our future.
We are up to our nose in a cesspool with no courageous, wise and willing leaders ready to plunge in and save us. Even if such leaders were to emerge and tell us the truth, they would be stoned to death by voters unwilling to accept the truth. We are a credit card, bum check passing society about to receive notification from our creditors marked Insufficient Funds.
Our great, great grandchildren might be able to save us if we raised the minimum wage to a thousand dollars an hour, but barring that, were in Deep Shit.
Report this