|
|||
|
Ellen Goodman: A Lousy Way to Win Back CongressPosted on Oct 5, 2006BOSTON—If I had my druthers, this election would have turned on the war in Iraq. I hoped that when the voters finally got it, “it’’ would have been the disaster that’s turned this war zone into a recruiting ground for terrorists. Instead we have the self-described party of family values caught enabling or at least ignoring a sick puppy of a congressman, Mark Foley, who was sex-talking electronically to teenage pages. Instead we have Speaker Dennis Hastert dismissing such an exchange as merely “over-friendly’’ and White House press secretary Tony Snow describing the messages as “naughty.’’ We even have right-wing webmaster Matt Drudge blaming the teenagers themselves as “16- and 17-year-old beasts.’’ This scandal is what has registered on the political Richter scale. This is what voters are asking their representatives about. Well, I wouldn’t have chosen to play on this field, but I will take it. The late political scientist James David Barber once said that nobody understands the word “deficit,’’ but everyone understands the word “adultery.’’ Maybe nobody knows what to think about solving the problem of Iraq, but they know what to think about the Florida congressman, Maf54, instant-messaging a teenage page: “how’s my favorite young stud doing?’’ This scandal keeps adding up to the same punch line: You can’t make this stuff up. A 52-year-old co-chair of the Congressional Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus turns up on ABC News sounding like one of the creeps who populate sweeps week on “To Catch a Predator.’’ A politician who testified in Congress that sex offenders “prey on our children like animals’’ is revealed chatting about a teen getting “horny.’’ Advertisement Remember the last presidential campaign, when the religious right claimed the “values voters’’ as their own? Having insisted that values were partisan, the same Republicans are whining that value-busting is nonpartisan. This scandal, said brother Jeb Bush, “has nothing to do with Republican or Democrat. It’s just wrong.’’ Indeed in a dizzying move, the right-wing spinmeisters are trying to blame Foley’s pathological follies on “political correctness.’’ The ever-agile Newt Gingrich was first to suggest that Hastert held back from chastising Foley out of fear he’d be “accused of gay-bashing’’ because Foley was long assumed to be gay. Who knew that Hastert was a closet liberal? Next, after days of stunned silence, the religious right also found its familiar voice. They chimed in to blame, yes, “tolerance.’’ Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council accused “a society that rejects sexual restraints in the name of diversity’’ and a Republican leadership that puts “political correctness ... ahead of protecting children.’’ Said Perkins, “when we hold up tolerance and diversity ... this is what you end up getting.’’ Who would have dreamed that the same party that ran the 2004 campaign as a crusade against gay marriage would suffer from an overdose of acceptance for homosexuality? Is it any wonder that in all this confusion a Fox News screenshot misidentified Foley as a Democrat? As for Mark Foley himself? This is a man with one foot in the closet, a man who only publicly acknowledged his sexuality this week from a rehab facility and through a lawyer. For over a decade Foley dodged questions about being gay, describing them as “revolting and unforgivable.’’ Now he says he was abused as a child by a clergyman. Can it be that the problem behind his double life was too much tolerance and diversity? I remember when Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania blamed the Catholic priest pedophilia scandal on the blueness of Boston, “a seat of academic, political, and cultural liberalism in America.’’ You can no more label homosexuals as predators than you can label milkmen as murderers of Amish schoolgirls. But you can try. The Republicans have been all too successful in getting a hold on the language and politics of values. There isn’t a parent is this country who doesn’t wince at and worry about the sexualization of children all over the culture, from the clothing racks to the Internet. But the right has grabbed onto the free-floating anxiety and attached it to everything on their agenda from abstinence-only education to the dismissal of a Texas teacher for taking her kids to a museum that had nude statues. Now we are beginning to get “it.’’ The self-proclaimed party of moral values can’t keep its own House in order. The Republicans in charge of too much for too long have one value they now hold above all others: staying in power. Got it? Well, that’s a start. Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman(at symbol)globe.com. Previous item: Marie Cocco: Foley's a Sideshow Next item: Joe Conason: The Gang That Couldn't Talk Straight CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By David Teachout, October 11, 2006 at 9:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I worry for democracy when people begin ceasing to care how power is gained. And no, I’m not talking about republicans.
The Mark Foley scandal is horrible, the Iraq occupation is horrific, the denial of our basic liberties is despicable and the slow movement towards fascism is deplorable. But what does it all matter if the underlying ideology that supports all this isn’t brought into public awareness and criticised?
What does it mean when democrats are incapable of winning the minds of the public on the basis of their ideas and instead must wait till republicans so screw up and the public simply considers the other choice as being “can’t do much worse”?
Focusing on gaining “control” of congress by any means necessary is exactly the type of thinking that democrats ascribe to the republicans and yet they do it themselves. Is it any wonder that the two parties are considered by many to be two sides of the same coin?
Report thisBy Mad As Hell, October 8, 2006 at 5:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
THIS is a lousy way to win back the House? Why?
Today, I watched Fox/Pravda until my stomach turned. They were CLEARLY trying on a “news” format to try to position it that the Republicans weren’t in the hole they are in, that the Democrats were too shrill on Foleygate, and it was nothing but the usual Fox propaganda.
Then, on CNN, Cong. Patrick McHenry (the opposite of Patrick Henry) was asked by Wolf Blitzer if he had ANY proof of the allegations he was tossing around, that the Dems knew about Foley and waited to use it on the GOP. McHenry responded “Do you have any proof they DIDN’T?”
Nope. I also don’t have any proof that a giant invisible Snoopy float isn’t magically affecting the Brazilian sugar crop.
Only a Hondo or a Big Al would buy into such a stupid (and despicable) argument. Charlie Wrangel was chuckling trying to keep from leaping TOO quick to land a sleep-inducing hay-maker!
Even that spineless, ball-less shill Blitzer is finally growing a set. As the GOP comes up with wilder and wilder ways to try to spin this Foley mess, it’s becoming TRULY bizarre. Where is the Congressman who will stand up and say “Hey, we screwed up BIG time. We’ll get rid of our leaders who didn’t do the right thing, and make sure it doesn’t happen again.” Dead silence.
All the Dems need is a TV ad that says: “Had enough yet?”
Report thisBy Anjinsan, October 7, 2006 at 5:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Foley scandel is now being used as a distraction from the real issues.
War, Constitutional Rights, and fiscal responsability.
This election hasn’t turned yet.
Report thisA formidable opponent has not yet been defeated.
Don’t count your chickens, guard the henhouse….
By Dave Summers, M.D., October 6, 2006 at 10:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
First of The Bill of Rights: “Congress [and the Executive & Judicial
Report thisBranches] shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion…” But George W. Bush, America’s first religious, aka
Republican, Party & all other “wolves in sheepskin” who cluelessly
wish to theocratize/annihilate our Democracy _ “the last best hope
of earth” - are both ignorant & contmptuous of this foremost
guarantee of freedom of conscience. While exploiting “the opium
of the people” they also destroy moral values, science, reason,
common sense and what was once America’s world respect &
proud heritage. “The first requisite of the happiness of the
people is the abolition of religion” (from a 19th c. descendant of a
a long line of rabbis; and 21st c. America surely needs his advice).
By Michael Murry, October 6, 2006 at 12:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
George Orwell did the definitive take on all this puritanical sexual repression crap in his novel 1984. In one scene he has Julia, Winston Smith’s paramour, describe “sex gone sour,” the bottled up natural joy that Big Brother forces underground so that all the frustration results in fuming fascists “waving flags and marching up and down.”
Religious puritanical sexual repression has created more perverts than tolerance and openness ever have or ever will. “Values America” has once again become a sick adolescent joke. Too bad for all the dead and maimed Iraqis, Afghans, and American GIs. Letting these corrupt Republican creeps into power has to rank as the stupidest thing Americans have ever done.
Report thisBy yours truly, October 5, 2006 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes, we the people didn’t invent this Foley folly, it was handed to us. And it’s not our fault that what he did just happens to evoke universal outrage. And yes they can blame everything on us liberals and even claim that it was our loosy-goosy society that made them do it, Foley his child molesting and Hastert & accomplices their subsequent cover-up. None of their shananigans will work, though. Not this time. That’s because we’re down to what’s fundamental now, and what could be more fundamental than the protection of one’s child from sexual predators. It’s a survival thing, no doubt.
Report this.
By Druthers, October 5, 2006 at 9:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I fully agree, they are power-mad and they have a program. The problem is that the program is for them, not for the country or the American people.
Report thisFor those who imagine the world if filled with “loving mommies and daddies, they had better take a good look into the eyes of Bush and Cheney—remember Putin? Behind those Republican eyeballs are dollar bills, huge stacks of dollar bills, tax-free, customs free, and morality free.
By Mad As Hell, October 5, 2006 at 2:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t care WHAT it takes to get these bastards out of power.
They have totally corrupted our government, poisoned our environment, sold our economic power abroad, reintroduced racism as a political concept, and voted to end our sacred liberties.
If it takes a sex scandal to anger the voters enough to get rid of them, so be it.
Is it as important as the PROOF that Rice lied under oath? Or that Mad King George ignored and DESTROYED anyone who showed up with facts that proved the Iraq invasion was unjustified and doomed to failure? Or that George Allen was and still is a racist and deserves to be tossed from the Senate? Or that for the FIRST time more of our money is going off-shore to pay off interest than is coming in from foreign investments? Or that 800 years of Habeas Corpus has been abandoned to the discretionary judgement of Mad King George and his band of Merrie Fascists?
No, it is NOT as important as all that. But if it’s the match that starts the fire that cleanses us of all this filth, I’m all for it!
It reveals, as Ellen says, the pure, total and perfect corruption of the ruling Republicans. Power comes first, last, always.
OK, it IS more important than whether or not Roger Clemens and Andy Petite used steroids or not.
Report this