Corporate media plays to ignorance, using ignorance like a fine instrument, working on emotions and fears, Limbaugh and counter parts, taking Wrights comments and making them newspeak using the ignorant is the best and necessary tool used to keep the masses dumbed down. 

Our schools seem to be going in the same direction.  In order to control the teeming masses, they must be kept ignorant and not so teeming. Entertain them with pablum on the media, cut funds for schools. Education should be for the elite.

Keep the truth well hidden, let people live and think they should fear, fear itself, keep the anointed, religions as one part of the foundation, building on hate and differences.  Unity of the people could take power and control from the special ones. 

Wright is a great point to keep the necessary hate smoldering, keep it going, keep the difference front of everyones nose.  Let the people vote against themselves again.

For those willing to mix a bit of TRUTH with their ‘religion’… (something the Rev Jeremiah Wright committed..ALAS...it is a felony!)…

Have a read…

The Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright and the Audacity of Truth
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Saturday 22 March 2008

Over the past week or so, mainstream media have turned much of their attention to the fiery sermons of the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright. Dr. Wright is pastor to Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois) and his family. He was also, until recently, pastor of the Trinity United Church of Christ of Chicago.

Most of the discussion and commentary about Dr. Wright’s sermons have come from a predominantly white media. The points of discussion have centered on what they consider to be the “vile, racist and un-American things” said by Dr. Wright. Very few, if any, of the discussions have focused on the historical basis and accuracy of what Dr. Wright actually said.

The major problem with the discussions is they have been largely one-sided. The media have used the imagery of Dr. Wright, clad in African garb, shouting in the cadence of an old-time fire and brimstone minister and playing to the camera as a scare tactic. Has this become the “Willie Hortonization” of Senator Barack Obama?

The reporting and commentary on Dr. Wright’s words have been presented from the perspective of people who either have no appreciation for the African-American historical experience or a personal agenda when it comes to presenting these issues.

Read on...(it’s lengthy but educational)

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032208F.shtml

(FYI..posted elsewhere, just because it IS so educational)

When I first became aware of this story, it was because of an in depth analysis by Rush Limbaugh.

Rush was playing the man’s sermons over and over again, and pointing out the juicy points. Taking great pains to examine them in detail. From his unique perspective.

Obviously, we can expect more of this if Obama is nominated, along with in depth interviews of every teacher he’s had from kindergarten forward, and specials on the life story of every one of his relatives to second cousin.

To the Neo-con’s hope must represent a very dangerous thing.

How can a predominantly black church be described as separatist and hateful, Shockley asks, when it is part of an overwhelmingly white denomination...?”

Interesting point for a change, Shockley, and perhaps you would like to consider something else that is happening too?

White people are currently exhorting a ‘separatist’ Tibet and expressing their endemic ‘hatred’ of all things Chinese and supposedly supporting Tibetan Buddhists by dishonest and biased media reports (USA + Germany), violent demonstration and malicious screaming or ignorant outbursts on the internet.

In the past, Tibetans have hopelessly confused religion and nationality. It now works to their disadvantage just as it has done with Israel and the Jews. The problem for Westerners is their own fantasies when confronting all of that and they in turn have become hopelessly confused by their wilfully ignoring the history.

With all things religious, they veil a deeply felt need to be part of a group and, sadly, to commune with the group but not the deity the ‘followers’ presume to worship. That is also a racial phenomenon and it was not by coincidence that the church manipulated or was manipulated to ever more un-Christian crusades.

But it is a mistake to think that Christianity is a “white denomination” or at least, religion. Palestine is West ASIA, not somewhere in Europe and that is where Jesus taught and was murdered for his troubles , according to the story. The wisdom he taught flowed from further East, not from the Jews.

But white people think of their religion as “white” and “European” despite all that. They have usurped Christianity and Jesus for their own ends. The latest “crusade” into Iraq and Afghanistan rather proves that Americans and Europeans have nor more regard for the real teachings of Jesus than they did 1,000 years ago.

So, finally, when ARE you going to free yourselves from a slavery religion, Shockley? You really do have to establish your own church and trace your chosen religion back to its real roots in Asia and East Africa in order to find the REAL Jesus. No white person will ever help you do that.

Historically the prophetic tradition has been to call for repentance and change of direction.  Fundamentalistic, revivalistic backgrounds are filled with prophetic style evangelistic messages, painting the reality of eternal salvation or damnation, and calling for personal repentance and commitment to Jesus Christ.  A 2nd form of this prophetic tradition is to speak truth to power, and calls for changes in the direction not only of an individual but of a society and nation.  The language is also couched in the judgment of blessing of God, but the timeframe for opportunity is shortened, and current events illustrate the call for repenetance.  Dr. King combined the biblical and evangelistic style of preaching with a social prophetic style of speaking truth to power.  The years following saw the social preachers, leaning less on the biblical prophetic language and drawing more on the language of politics and psychology, while the personal evangelistic style became increasingly focused on individual sins within society - abortion, sexcual immorality, preceived threats to family, and worst of all humanisn. 

Dr. Wright, is that strange blend of pastor, who preaches evangelisticly a message of eternal consequense and personal responsibility, while also speaking prophetically within a social context.  He offers grace and hope for the sinner, but a warning of judgment of sinful institutions and established practices. The sinner is welcomed, while powers enabeling poverty, racism, militarism, perverted patriotism, and global greed are attacked.  After generations of having these messages separated into “liberal” and “Conservative” camps and being able to choose, Dr. Wright assalts our sensibilities with the reality of a both/and or neither. 

Power brokers within the church will obviously be offended by Dr. Wright, as will political leaders.  Barack even distancing himself from some of the language of prophetic warning.  It’s a lot easier to preach prophetically, than to govern prophetically. 

Thank you for the discussion.  Hopefully local pastors who have easily repeated slogans in touch with their religious spokesman, will now seriously wrestle with real answers to local situations. They need to work to create a middle where truth and understanding sheds light and gives direction.  We know both ends, left and right will harden their positions.  Let’s be sure that in the middle there is a large enough core to offer hope and possibility.