LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Holiday Scheer! Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
November 29, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Fred Branfman on 'The Making of an Elder Culture'

China Sets Its Greenhouse Gas Target

Global Markets Hit by Dubai's Debt Crisis

Polls Show Conservative Ahead as Honduras Vote Nears

Monsanto Dominance Prompts Antitrust Inquiry

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Last Dance in Havana

Last Dance in Havana

By Eugene Robinson
$19.95

more items

 
Truthdig Podcast

Imaginary Weapons

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Oct 30, 2007
Pentagon building

James Harris and Josh Scheer

Truthdig speaks with Sharon Weinberger, whose book “Imaginary Weapons” looks into why the Pentagon has spent billions of dollars on fantastical weapons programs, some of which defy the laws of physics.

Subscribe to Truthdig Podcasts

Subscribe directly:
iTunes

If you don't have iTunes,
copy this address:


Visit the Podcast Archives

Click here for a transcript of this podcast.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Craig, November 20, 2007 at 12:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is completely off topic, but…

The difference in volume between the interviewer and the guest on this recording makes it difficult to listen to this clip on speakers. Having to turn down the volume everytime the interviewer asks a question and back up to hear the guest made me just turn it off, eventually.

The percieved difference in volume is less on headphones, which is the cause of the imbalance in the first place. If producers would simply remix the clip with a limiter, or by “normalizing” the lower volume in a digital audio editing program, the problem would be solved.

I only bring it up because the audience would be increased by taking the relatively little time to do this, and god knows progressive voices need all the amplification they can get.

Report this

By Claire M., November 1, 2007 at 8:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is the same thing at play with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signing into law faulty gun microchip technology against the advice of his own advisers, including liberals at UCLA, who indicated this technology does not work—and there is no guarantee that it will work.  But it sounds good to the ignorant, and appeases a group of stridently hysterical people on a mission, so it’s great political fodder. It’s all for appearances.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.