Basis of Domestic Surveillance Was ‘Flawed,’ Report Finds
Posted on Jul 10, 2009
Former President Bush’s infamous warrant-free domestic surveillance plan, instituted after 9/11 to monitor potentially suspicious communication between parties within and outside of the U.S., has deservedly gotten a bad rap—and it’s about to get worse, thanks to a congressionally mandated report released Friday.
The report, though not critical of the program’s objectives, sharply criticizes the legal advice provided to the White House by the Justice Department.
Among other things, the report cites a Justice Department conclusion that “it was extraordinary and inappropriate that a single DOJ attorney, John Yoo, was relied upon to conduct the initial legal assessment” of the surveillance program.
“The lack of oversight and review of Yoo’s work ... contributed to a legal analysis of the [program] that at a minimum was factually flawed,” it says.
The report says Yoo largely circumvented both his boss, Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, and Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Yoo, the man: Once again, former DOJ legal adviser John Yoo is at the center of a Bush-era controversy.