
At his press conference today, the president came refreshingly (although just a tad belatedly) clean about the fact that Iraq played no part whatsoever in the Sept. 11 attacks. Watch it.
A howler from Bush: “Nobodys ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack.” OK, maybe not in those words, but how ‘bout in these?
Crooks and Liars:
Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are not happy campers today thats for sure. He admits he was wrong about WMDs in Iraq and now this.
QUESTION: A lot of the consequences you mentioned for pulling out seem like maybe they never would have been there if we hadnt gone in. How do you square all of that?
BUSH: I square it because imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein, who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who had relations with Zarqawi.
You know, Ive heard this theory about, you know, everything was just fine until we arrived [in Iraq] and you know, the stir-up-the-hornets-nest theory. It just doesnt hold water, as far as Im concerned.
The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East. They were
QUESTION: What did Iraqi have to do with that?
BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?
QUESTION: The attacks upon the World Trade Center.
BUSH: Nothing. . . . .Except for its part of and nobodys ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a Iraq the lesson of September the 11th is: Take threats before they fully materialize…
From ThinkProgress
Although Bush acknowledged that Iraq played no role in the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, he reaffirmed his decision to invade Iraq because “the best way to defeat resentment is through hope, and the best way to do hope is through a form of government.” Got it?
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |