LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

With Libya, Sec. Gates Puts His Foot Down

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Mar 31, 2011
DOD / Petty Officer 1st Class Chad J. McNeeley

There’s a lot of talk coming out of Washington, but Defense Secretary Robert Gates assured Congress on Thursday that the Pentagon’s mission in Libya is “much more limited” than regime change and said American troops would not be sent to the country, even in a training capacity, “as long as I’m in this job.”  —PZS

The Christian Science Monitor:

The US military will not provide any troops on the ground in Libya, either to aid operations or to train the rebels, Secretary Gates assured lawmakers. “Not as long as I’m in this job.”

That said, he conceded that rebels could use some help if they hope to overthrow Col. Qaddafi. “What the opposition needs is some training, some command and control, and some organization,” Gates said. “It’s pretty much a pickup ballgame at this point.”

But that training will not come from US troops, Gates stressed repeatedly in his testimony before the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. NATO allies could take this role, he suggested. “Frankly, there are many countries that can do that,” he said.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By John Poole, April 1, 2011 at 9:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think the no fly “thingie” has moved from protecting the threatened civilians in
Benghazi to protecting the oil fields in eastern Libya. The debate about whether
to arm the so called rebels is only to figure out what they might need to be an
effective security guard force to protect the oil fields. The plan all along was to
take possession of the oil fields. This empire does indeed have “humanitarian”
impulses but only for the global plutocracy which has become accustomed to
having the fossil fuel resources to keep their hot tubs very comfy.
  By the way I was in Libya last summer. My son was the ARSO at the American
embassy in Tripoli. He and his wife are back safe in DC thankfully. It was one
strange experience.

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, April 1, 2011 at 7:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr.Gates said “Libya is “much more limited” than regime change and said American troops would not be sent to the country, even in a training capacity, “as long as I’m in this job.” 
  Now correct me if I’m wrong,but didn’t he announce just recently that he is leaving his job soon????I guess we’ll see troops in Libya and Gates on Dancing with the Stars…

Report this
getreal1's avatar

By getreal1, March 31, 2011 at 11:56 pm Link to this comment

The rebels, whoever they are, have done just fine without training. All they need is the continued air support of the coalition forces. The Libyan army cannot resupply itself and will eventually run out of munitions and be forced to decide that it’s not worth giving up their lives for a thuggish dictator. It’s their civil war.

Report this

By glider, March 31, 2011 at 11:55 pm Link to this comment

Semantic games.  The specification here is “troops”, as in we have pulled our “combat troops” out of Iraq.  “Troops” are so yesterday, Gates is a Republican and is into the privatization of our wars.  Follow his future career in the field.

Report this

By Steve E, March 31, 2011 at 7:03 pm Link to this comment

I guess your on the way out the door Robert, leave your resignation with the
secretary. I don’t see Britain or Italy doing any training in the near future.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.