Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 1, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Hydropower Illuminates a Piece of History






Truthdig Bazaar
The Fire Next Time

The Fire Next Time

By James Baldwin

Speechwright

Speechwright

By William F. Gavin

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Wisconsin Recount a Mess

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 4, 2011
WxMom (CC-BY-SA)

Brad Friedman has taken an exhaustive look at Wisconsin’s Supreme Court recount—a race that held national interest before dropping off the radar—and determined that officials are working without transparency, using flawed techniques and posting false information.  —PZS

Brad Blog:

Where Minnesota’s post-election hand count of the 2008 U.S. Senate election between then Sen. Norm Coleman and now Sen. Al Franken was, as we wrote at the UK’s Guardian at the time, “one of the longest and most transparent election hand-counts in the history of the US,” Wisconsin has made it extremely difficult (putting it nicely) to know what the hell is actually going on in their statewide “recount” of the April 5th, 2011 state Supreme Court election between Justice David Prosser and Asst. Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg.

Where Minnesota’s chief election official, Sec. of State Mark Ritchie, oversaw a process to ensure that updated and accurate numbers were easily tracked and transparently shared with the media on a daily basis, Wisconsin’s chief election authority, their Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.), has posted (and even sometimes removed) confusing, misleading, and unclear updates, often with inaccurate information, on various schedules, and frequently with little or no explanation for wholesale changes and deletion of data.

Where Minnesota counted every vote by hand with full public scrutiny, including photographs and video cameras, Wisconsin is tabulating ballots, often by the same oft-failed, easily-manipulated computer systems that counted them in the first place, behind barriers that preclude broad public oversight, under an agreement between both campaigns which disallows the use of video cameras by observers.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By CaptRon, May 5, 2011 at 10:27 am Link to this comment

The longer this is stalled out helps limit Walker’s pillage if nothing else. The time for retaliation by recall looms ever closer and if their legislators can be recalled and changed positively it can make Walker a lame duck nearly. Always hoping for the best to watch this crook squirm. Crook because he took money to do it.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, May 5, 2011 at 2:38 am Link to this comment

Republicans and numbers is like oil and water!

Report this

By Scarlett, May 4, 2011 at 11:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

^^^ In the last election here in Colorado, upwards of
1500 people who voted found not even to be residents of
State.  Guess what party…?

Report this

By purplewolf, May 4, 2011 at 8:45 pm Link to this comment

Bet the repukelican comes out the winner, just as with G.W.‘s stolen elections. They are dishonest and never play by the law and rules as they are above the law. Don’t thin k so, just ask them.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.